12/07/20101 bidder’s conference call: arra early on ® electronic enhancement to individualized...

29
12/07/2010 1 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top Grant Michigan Department of Education Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Barb Schinderle, Consultant Lisa Wasacz, Consultant

Upload: morris-heath

Post on 30-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

12/07/2010 1

Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On®

Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant andClimb to the Top Grant

Michigan Department of EducationOffice of Early Childhood Education and Family ServicesBarb Schinderle, ConsultantLisa Wasacz, Consultant

212/07/2010

Purpose of Conference Call

Introduce the availability of two ARRA grants: EE-IFSP and Climb to the Top

Introduce the expectations of the proposed activities

Outline the required elements for development of a proposal

312/07/2010

Logistics

This Technical Assistance workshop is covering two Requests for Proposals (RFPs) - one for Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) and one focused on improving family outcomes titled Climb to the Top

412/07/2010

Board Approved Criteria forCompetitive Early On Grants Criteria was approved by the State Board of

Education on December 8, 2010 Adopt scientifically based practices to

ensure the delivery of quality early intervention services, including service coordination and evaluations and assessments using the latest best practices based on peer-reviewed research

Establish data systems and use data to inform decisions and improve delivery of services

512/07/2010

Board Approved Criteria forCompetitive Early On Grants Increase Early Intervention Services

provider effectiveness and reduce shortages of personnel in key areas such as speech/language, occupational, and physical therapy

Improve outcomes for all infants and toddlers with disabilities, particularly in the areas of positive social emotional skills; the acquisition of, and use of, knowledge and skills; and the use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

612/07/2010

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Both the EE-IFSP and the Climb to

the Top grants will be awarded under Part C of IDEA, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds

The following four (4) ARRA principles will apply to both grants

712/07/2010

Four Principles of ARRA Spend funds quickly to save and

create jobs Improve student achievement through

school improvement and reform Ensure transparency, reporting, and

accountability Invest one-time ARRA funds

thoughtfully to minimize the “funding cliff”

812/07/2010

Applications will be reviewed for the following: Strategies and proposals that adhere to the

four reform areas of ARRA funding Capacity to complete proposed activities

within the allowed time period Feasibility to replicate the activities across

the state The potential impact on the early childhood

system for infants and toddlers The sustainability of the proposed

innovation

912/07/2010

Anticipated Timeline for both RFPs

RFPs Announced- December 2, 2010 TA Webinar- December 7, 2010 Applications due- January 13, 2011 Review session- February 3, 2011 Recommendations forwarded

to State Superintendent- February 4, 2011 Letters to all by- February 18, 2011 Grant services begin- February 21, 2011 Ending date of grant- September 30,

2011

12/07/2010 10

Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP)

Voluntary – Competitive – ARRA Grant

1112/07/2010

Eligible Applicants

Non profit or for-profit agencies Intermediate school districts Institutions of higher education Eligible local partnerships

1212/07/2010

Grant Purpose To develop or expand upon an

existing electronic IFSP to align data and paperwork while providing for stronger coordination across systems

The EE-IFSP will serve to help coordinate data collection of the eight (8) results and compliance indicators for Early On to meet federal requirements set forth in the SPP/APR

1312/07/2010

Anticipated Outcomes Consistent and accurate data collection of

the eight (8) Part C indicators An integrated system to help with

duplication of effort within the various systems

This data system should build upon and sync to grantee’s own data system at their local level

The EE-IFSP grantee will share and present the developed system at the 2011 Early On Conference and System Update meetings after completion

1412/07/2010

Application Review Process

Scored according to rubrics Maximum score 110 points

100 points possible for rubric 10 possible points for voluntary 2 page narrative

Individual review and team consensus on recommendation Rank order according to score Verbal presentation may be requested MDE reserves the right to negotiate final agreement

1512/07/2010

Funds

Total funds available are $650,000 Applicants may request support for

proposed activities, up to the maximum grant amount of $650,000

1612/07/2010

Application Components

Application cover sheet Assurances and Certifications Project Abstract (project

description, key personnel, commitment and capacity) – one page only

Project Implementation Plan Budget Summary and Detail Narrative – voluntary 2 page limit

1712/07/2010

Rubric Consists of 10 Criteria Capacity 15 points ARRA principles 15 points Evidence of efficiency 15 points Data system components 25 points Confidentiality maintained 10 points Sustainability of system 5 points Potential impact to Early On 5 points Parents incorporated 5 points ReImagine district 3 points Model can be replicated 2 points

1812/07/2010

Narrative Component - Voluntary Potential to earn 10 points – not

considered in rubric 2 pages maximum Address key area(s) of the EE-IFSP

grant criteria is considered to be a critical aspect of the success of this project but has not been addressed

Clearly identify this section separately

12/07/2010 19

Climb to the Top

Voluntary – Competitive – ARRA Grant

2012/07/2010

Eligible Applicants

State partnering agencies Intermediate school districts Institutions of higher education Eligible local partnerships

2112/07/2010

Grant Purpose

To develop and share activities designed to improve Family Outcomes as stated in the SPP/APR, Indicator 4 for Part C

Share activities statewide with local service areas to help families: better understand their rights effectively communicate their children’s

needs children develop and learn

2212/07/2010

Anticipated Outcomes Activities would improve family outcomes When appropriate, activities tied to

Michigan’s SPP/APR for Indicator 4 Share activities with MDE to make

available to all local early intervention programs

Grantee(s) share and present the developed activities/strategies at the 2011 Early On Conference and System Update meetings after completion

2312/07/2010

Application Review Process

Scored according to rubrics Maximum score 100 points Individual review and team consensus on

recommendation Rank order according to score Verbal presentation may be requested MDE reserves the right to negotiate final

agreement

2412/07/2010

Funds

Total funds available are $100,000 Applicants may request support for

proposed activities, up to the maximum grant amount of $100,000

2512/07/2010

Application Forms

Application cover sheet Assurances and Certifications Project Abstract (project

description, key personnel, commitment and capacity) – one page only

Project Implementation Plan Budget Summary and Detail Narrative – 2 page maximum

2612/07/2010

Rubric Consists of 9 Criteria

Capacity 15 points Activities to improve family outcomes 20 points ARRA principles 15 points Activities tied to Indicator 4 10 points Latest research and data employed 10 points Activities can be replicated 10 points Potential impact to Early On 10 points Parents incorporated 7 points ReImagine district 3 points

2712/07/2010

Narrative Component

Two pages maximum, addressing the following key areas:Explain activities to be developed

including additional information not included in the Project Implementation Plan

Address parent involvementInclude past family outcome activities so

reviewers can determine capacity to complete proposed activities

2812/07/2010

Application Checklist

Is the application in a font no smaller than 10 point? Is the Application Cover sheet signed by the authorized

signatory? Is the Budget Summary signed by the authorized signatories? Are the forms and Project Abstract completed and bound to the

original and ALL seven copies in the following order? Application Cover sheet (page 1 of application) Assurances and Certifications (pages 1a through 1d of

application) Project Abstract (page 2 of application) Project Implementation Plan (page 3 of application) Budget Budget Summary (page 4 of application) Budget Detail Relevant support documents

12/07/2010 29

Questions?Barb Schinderle

[email protected]

Lisa Wasacz

[email protected]

517-241-4520