14 inpro infrastructure presentation final3(슬라이드 노트 kepco
TRANSCRIPT
2
3
ü Completion ofKori #1 (1978)
ü Completion of theFirst OPR1000 (1995)
üExport to UAE (2009)üFirst APR1400 is
under construction(2014)
4
■ : Nuclear■ : Coal■ : Oil■ : LNG■ : Hydro■ : Renewable
Installed Capacity(31.Dec. 2013)
86.2GW
20.7GW
25.5GW5GW
22.7GW
6.3GW6GW
5
Considering energy security, environment protection
and industrial competitiveness, share of nuclear
energy will gradually increase to 29% in 2035- The 2nd Master Plan for National Energy (Jan. 2014)
147GW
0
50
100
150
2024 2035
[Effective Capacity by Year in Korea]6
28% 29%
36GW 43GW
129GW147GW
7
Act
Enforcement Decree
Enforcement Regulations(Prime Minister’s Regulation)
8
Enforcement Regulations(Prime Minister’s Regulation)
Technical Standards (NSSC Regulations)
Regulatory StandardsRegulatory Guidelines
Guideline for Safety Review & InspectionIndustrial Code and Standards
[Legal and Regulatory Structure]
PresidentPresident
Prime Minister
Other Government Ministries
Ministry of Trade,Industry and Energy
Ministry of science,ICT and Future Planning
National Assembly
Nuclear Safety and Security commissionNuclearSafetyRegulation
Other Government Ministries
Ministry of Trade,Industry and Energy
Ministry of science,ICT and Future Planning
KINS, KINACNuclear industry Nuclear Research
and Development
NuclearSafetyRegulation
NSSC (Nuclear Safety and Security Commission)-Regulatory enforcement authority-Independent, stand-alone, vice minister-level government agency
KINS (Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety) −Quasi-government agency, entirely dedicated to nuclear safety regulation
KINAC (Korea Institute of Nuclear Nonproliferation and Control) −Quasi-government agency, for maintaining the efficient implementation of safeguards, export/import controls and
securities related to nuclear facilities and materials
Government Organizations concerning Nuclear Energy
9
Nuclear Safety & SecurityCommission(NSSC)
TechnicalCommittee
Nuclear Industries(KEPCO, KHNP, etc)
Technical ExpertOrganizations
(KINS & KINAC)
Conduct Review, Inspection andRequest Additional information
Submit Information andImplementation Results
10
[General Structure of Nuclear Regulation & Licensing]
5 6 7 8 9
■ : Private■ : Public
Unit : Billion $
R&D 1.0 Bil. $
Capital 2.6 Bil. $
Fuel 0.9 Bil. $
O&M 1.4 Bil. $
5.3 5.4
4.0 4.3
6.7
7.8 8.1 8.3 8.0
0 1 2 3 4 5
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
11
[Total Investment Trend in Nuclear Sector between ‘03~’12]
O&M 1.4 Bil. $
Radiation 0.1 Bil. $
Waste 0.65Bil.$
Labor 0.5 Bil. $
Others 0.85Bil.$
Investment (2012)
3.24.0 4.3
100
120
140 Unit : GW ■ : Others ■ : Nuclear ■ : Peak Demand
100GW
126GW 130GW 131GW
0
20
40
60
80
100
2015 2020 2025 2027
12
[Expansion Plan and Peak Demand by Year]
100GW
25GW 30GW 36GW 36GW25% 24% 28% 27%
13
Health, Safety and Security, Engineering & Cost, Environmental Factors, etc., all are considered and scrutinized during Siting.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Trade, Industry & Energy Committee
OverseasProject
EquipmentManufacturing
Design &Engineering
Operation &Management
Korea’s Wholehearted Commitment &
Support for Nuclear Power
Trade, Industry & Energy Committee Nuclear
Fuel ConstructionMaintenance& Services
R&D PublicAcceptance
RadwasteManagement
Education &R&D
ExportControl
Nuclear Safety
Nuclear Medical
KoreanNuclearSociety
Women Interested in Nuclear
The KoreanSociety forNondestructiveTesting
Korea AtomicIndustrialForum
KoreaCoatingExpertsSociety14
Korea’s Wholehearted Commitment &
Support for Nuclear Power
Security of Energy Supply
StimulatingAll Industries
Reduction in GHG Emmissions
• Power Source Covering Base Load
• High Capacity Factor(Over 80%)
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
'08 '10 '12 '13
■ Total ■ Nuclear(108 KWh)
36% 31% 30% 27%
Contribution to Economic Growth
StimulatingAll Industries
Reduction in GHG Emmissions
Added Value
• Power Source Covering Base Load
• High Capacity Factor(Over 80%)
• Heavy industry • Construction• OA System• I&C System• Medicine, etc.
• Electricity Price(18.5%▲) VsConsumer Price (240%▲)
• Cheapest Electricity Source
※ Production Cost (2013)
Gen.(‘12)(GWh)
GHG reduction
Cost(Bil. $)
150,327 124Mil.Ton
1.4
• Nuclear Contribution
(source: White Paper on Nuclear Power Generation 2013
(source: KPX “2013 Power Market Statistics” 15
• White Paper• Safety Zone : Nuclear Energy • Safety Zone: Energy Zone
• White Paper• Safety Zone : Nuclear Energy • Safety Zone: Energy Zone
•
Safety Zone: Energy Camp• Teacher Training
Camp• Nuclear Knowl--edge Concert
• Olympiad, etc.
•
Safety Zone: Energy Camp• Teacher Training
Camp• Nuclear Knowl--edge Concert
• Olympiad, etc.
•
•Email• Newsletter• Official Website• SNS (Twitter, ..)• Nuclear HubSite “Atom Story”
•
•Email• Newsletter• Official Website• SNS (Twitter, ..)• Nuclear HubSite “Atom Story”
•
•Program informing Nuclear Policy, safety
•
•Program informing Nuclear Policy, safety
•
•Forums ofexperts andopinion leaders
• Policy of openingNPPs to the public (via Official web-site)
•
•Forums ofexperts andopinion leaders
• Policy of openingNPPs to the public (via Official web-site)
Education Program Digital PR Press & Media Others
For General Public & Residents in the Vicinity of the Facilities
Publications
16
• White Paper• Safety Zone : Nuclear Energy • Safety Zone: Energy Zone
• White Paper• Safety Zone : Nuclear Energy • Safety Zone: Energy Zone
•
Safety Zone: Energy Camp• Teacher Training
Camp• Nuclear Knowl--edge Concert
• Olympiad, etc.
•
Safety Zone: Energy Camp• Teacher Training
Camp• Nuclear Knowl--edge Concert
• Olympiad, etc.
•
•Email• Newsletter• Official Website• SNS (Twitter, ..)• Nuclear HubSite “Atom Story”
•
•Email• Newsletter• Official Website• SNS (Twitter, ..)• Nuclear HubSite “Atom Story”
•
•Program informing Nuclear Policy, safety
•
•Program informing Nuclear Policy, safety
•
•Forums ofexperts andopinion leaders
• Policy of openingNPPs to the public (via Official web-site)
•
•Forums ofexperts andopinion leaders
• Policy of openingNPPs to the public (via Official web-site)
q Deliberation on issuesq Workshops……
q Opinions are reflected in EIA
Public Hearings/Inquiries for Siting
Participation in Gov’ Meetings
17
q Nuclear Safety Committeeq Civil Environmental Monitorq Running a Hot-line
q by online or mailq The Ombudsman Systemq Panel of experts committee
Proposals and Recommendation
Participation as Local Residents
100
1. Nuclear power is Necessary
100100100
2. Increasing /maintaining NPPs
3. Nuclear as electricity source
4. Nuclear power contributes stable power supply.
■ Favorable ■ Unfavorable
0
20
40
60
80
Aug.13 Oct.13 May. 140
20
40
60
80
100
Aug.13 Oct.13 May. 140
20
40
60
80
100
Aug.13 Oct.13 May. 140
20
40
60
80
Aug.13 Oct.13 May. 14
18
Survey TargetSurvey Target General Public RespondentsRespondents 1,000~1,500
AgencyAgency• Korea Research• Korea Gallup, etc. NoteNote
• People over the age of 19• By home phone or mobile
86%84%
75%
78%75%
69%
74%70%
77%
88%90%
87%
RE
0
50
100
150
2020 2027
RE
0
50
100
150
2024 2035
19
(source: The 2nd MPNE)(source: The 6th BPE)
126W
30GW24%
131GW
36GW27%
129GW
36GW28%
147GW
43GW29%
■ : Ruling Saenuri■ : New Politics Alliance■ : Reserved■ : Justice■ : Progressive
20
RERE
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20
■ : 1st BPE (Aug. 02) ■ : 2nd BPE (Dec. 04)■ : 3rd BPE (Dec. 06)
Unit : MW 41%
31%22%
■ : Ruling Saenuri■ : New Politics Alliance■ : Reserved■ : Justice■ : Progressive
(source: Korea Gallup)
[Planned Nuclear Expansion (1st ~ 3rd BPE)] [Support Rate (1st Week . Jul. 2014)]
3%3%
■ : Design/Engineering■ : Construction■ : Manufacture■ : O&M■ : Nuclear Safety■ : R&D■ : Admin’ & Mgmt.■ : NDT, other
8,000
10,000 ■: KEPCO, KHNP ■ : Manufacture ■: Service ■ : Design ■: Construction ■ : R&D■: Other Public ■ : Trade
9.6%13.9%
21
RERE
■ : Design/Engineering■ : Construction■ : Manufacture■ : O&M■ : Nuclear Safety■ : R&D■ : Admin’ & Mgmt.■ : NDT, other
(source: The 18th Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industry in 2012)
Total28,195
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
'04 '06 '08 '10 '12(source: The 18th Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industry in 2012)
■: KEPCO, KHNP ■ : Manufacture ■: Service ■ : Design ■: Construction ■ : R&D■: Other Public ■ : Trade
14.2%
13.9%
11.8%
9.6%
21%13.6%
6.3%
8,000
10,000 ■ : Permanent■ : Temporary
25,000
30,000 ■ : Permanent■ : Temporary32% 32% 91%
RERE
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
20s 30s 40s 50s 60s0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
▲ ★ ● Total
▲ : KEPCO, KHNP ★ : Manufacture, construction● : R&D, Other Public Sector
(source: The 18th Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industry in 2012) (source: The 18th Survey on the Status of Nuclear Industry in 2012)
22
15%20%
1%
98%
2%
89%
11%82%
18%
9%
KAERI(Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
Nuclear Training & Education Center(NTC)
KEPCOKEPCO International Nuclear Graduate School(KINGS)- Master’s /Doctoral Courses
KINS(Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety)International Nuclear Safety School(INSS)
KHNPKHNP Nuclear Power Education InstituteNuclear Site Training Center (4facilities)
[Institute / Academy] [Utility/Industry/Association]
23
Universities14 Universities with Nuclear related Dept.5 Universities with Energy related Dept.45 Universities with Radiology Dept.11 Research Institutes
KINAC(Korea Institute of Nuclear Non-proliferation & Control) International Nuclear Non-proliferation & Security Academy(INSA)
KNA (Korea Nuclear Association for International Cooperation)Human Resource Development Center
KPS (Korea Plant Service & Engineering Co.)
Nuclear Maintenance Training Center
KINS(Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety)International Nuclear Safety School(INSS)
KHNPKHNP Nuclear Power Education InstituteNuclear Site Training Center (4facilities)
Effective Education
System in Place
Other Advanced & Optimized Process•Steel Deck Plate Method•Automatic Welding of RC Loop•Concurrent Installation of RC Loop Pipe & RV Internals
•Shortened Post-tensioning Period•3D CAD Models for Construction•4D Simulation, etc.
Pre-fabrication & Modularization•Reinforcing Bar of Basement•RCB Exterior Wall 3-tiered CLP Module•MSIV Room Piping & Valve•MCR Ceiling Structural Steel, etc.•Installing 1or2 Pieces-dome Liner Plate•MCR Ceiling Structural Steel
Reducing
Construction Period
Personnel needed
Other Advanced & Optimized Process•Steel Deck Plate Method•Automatic Welding of RC Loop•Concurrent Installation of RC Loop Pipe & RV Internals
•Shortened Post-tensioning Period•3D CAD Models for Construction•4D Simulation, etc.
Pre-fabrication & Modularization•Reinforcing Bar of Basement•RCB Exterior Wall 3-tiered CLP Module•MSIV Room Piping & Valve•MCR Ceiling Structural Steel, etc.•Installing 1or2 Pieces-dome Liner Plate•MCR Ceiling Structural Steel
Reducing
Construction Period
Personnel needed
24
Government MinistriesGovernment Ministries(MOTIE / MOFAT / MSIP)(MOTIE / MOFAT / MSIP)
Material Program(IAEA, OECD/NEA)
• Technical Cooperation• Cooperative Research Program•Joint Collaborative Project
Regional Program(RCA, FNCA)
• Nuclear Community for TechnicalExchange in Asia
Bilateral Program(US, Japan, France, etc.)
• Peaceful Usage of Nuclear Power• Exchange of Policy and Technical Issue
Government MinistriesGovernment Ministries(MOTIE / MOFAT / MSIP)(MOTIE / MOFAT / MSIP)
Utility, Industry
Technical Exchange Program(WANO, INPO)
• Self-Assessment of Nuclear Industry
• Sharing Operating Experience• Technical Exchange Visit
Exchange of Technical Information
(WNA, NEI, etc.)
• Exchange of the Technical Information• Participating in Meetings/ Workshop
Benchmarking Training, etc.(Other Countries, Organizations)
• Contribution to NPP developmentthrough training, technical visit, etc.
• University• R & D• Reg. body• Utilities
25[Regional & International Arrangement in Korea]
26
Korea has achieved comprehensive nuclear infrastructure for efficient construction & safe operation
through steady nuclear expansion
Korean nuclear infrastructure is adequate when assessed by INPRO Methodology, which results from;
§ Strong commitment from the Korean Government§ Continuing NPP construction§ Consistent R&D
27
UR2. Industrial& Economic
UR4. Human
Resources
UR3. Political
Support & Public
Acceptance
UR5. Minimization of Infrastructure
UR6. Regional &
InternationalArrangement
UR1. Legal & Institutional
Korean nuclear infrastructure is adequate when assessed by INPRO Methodology, which results from;
§ Strong commitment from the Korean Government§ Continuing NPP construction§ Consistent R&D
28