15.369 corporate entrepreneurship: strategies for
TRANSCRIPT
MIT OpenCourseWareht______________tp://ocw.mit.edu
15.369 Corporate Entrepreneurship: Strategies for Technology-Based New Business Development Fall 2007
For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: ________________http://ocw.mit.edu/te___rms.
Corporate Venture CapitalStudy Project
Dr. Andrew Wang, NIST/ATPDr. Val Livada, MIT Sloan
Study TeamIan MacMillian Wharton School of Business
Edward Roberts Sloan School of Management
Val Livada Sloan School of Management
Andrew Wang National Institute of Standards and Technology
Objectives
Create knowledge base of CVC best-practicesStrategy and structureManagement and processOutcomes and metrics
Assess funding landscape for early-stage technology
Assess interaction between large and small companies in the innovation ecosystem
Primary source data
Qualitative interviews30 companies
Survey of CVCs48 CVC respondents
Case studyCVC and stakeholders
Survey RespondentsAir ProductsApplied MaterialsAscension HealthAstraZenecaBASFBDBlueCrossChevronDisneyDowDuchossoisDuPontEastmanEasenergyGenzymeGlaxoSmithKlineHondaIBMIn-Q-TelKodakLillyMichelin
MicrosoftMitsubishi PharmaMotorolaNECNokiaNovartisPanasonicPhilipsSAPSiemensSilicon Valley BankSouthern California GasSunTakedaTELUSTexas InstrumentsTurner BroadcastingTycoUnileverUPSVisa
Survey Data
1 1
2
1
4
5
3
8
6
8
1
2
3 3
02
46
8N
umbe
r
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005Year
CVC Organizations - Year Established
Survey Data
65%
35%
NoYes
Independent Subsidiary Company
63%
38%
Discretionary FundDedicated Fund
Type of Capitalization
CVC Organizational Form
Survey Data
102
03
23
212
510
2
0 5 10Number of CVCs
CVC Reporting Relationship - 1
CEO
CFO
CTO
Corporate - Strategy/Development
Corporate - Finance
Corporate - R&D
Business Unit - Head
Business Unit - Strategy/Development
Business Unit - Finance
Business Unit - R&D
Other
Survey Data
65%
15%
21%
CorporateBusiness UnitOther
Company Organization
8%
29%
23%
19%
21%
ExecutiveStrategy/DevelopmentFinance
R&DOther
Company Function
CVC Reporting Relationship - 2
Survey Data
73%
27%
NoYes
Other CVC Units at Company
69%
31%
NoYes
CVC Engage in Internal Venturing
69%
31%
NoYes
CVC Invest in Spin-Outs
CVC and Corporate Venturing
Survey Data
17%
83%
NoYes
Corporate
73%
27%
NoYes
Business Units
96%
4%
NoYes
External Investors
CVC Source of Capital
Survey Data
15%
15%
50%
21%
StrategicFinancialStrategic w/FinancialFinancial w/Strategic
CVC Investment Philosophy
Survey Data
8%
38%40%
15%Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Seek new directions
6%
25%
17%
52%
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Support existing businesses
15%
31%54%
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Provide window on new technology
4%
38%
31%
27% Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Provide window on new markets
10%
33%
31%
25% Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Develop new products
65%
29%
6%Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Improve manufacturing processes
CVC Strategic Aims
Survey Data
10%
6%
4%
19%
21%
40%
$0
Less than $1M
$1M to $3M
$3M to $5M
$5M to $10M
$10M to $20M
Over $20M
Direct Investments
40%
2%8%
13%
17%
17%
4%
$0
Less than $1M
$1M to $3M
$3M to $5M
$5M to $10M
$10M to $20M
Over $20M
Limited Partner Investments
CVC Investments - Total Amount 2004-2006
Survey Data
13%
10%
23%35%
15%4%
0
1 to 3
4 to 6
7 to 15
16 to 30
More than 30
CVC Direct Investments - Total Number 2004-2006
Survey Data
29
8
4
1 1
010
2030
Num
ber
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0Share of Investments (2004-2006) - Concept Stage
CVC Organizations - Concept Stage Investments 2004-2006
Survey Data
16
9
6
3
54
1
05
1015
Num
ber
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0Share of Investments (2004-2006) - Outside of USA
CVC Organizations - Non-U.S. Investments 2004-2006
Survey Data
17
1
5
7
43
23
1
4
05
1015
2025
3035
Num
ber o
f CVC
s
0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1Share of Outside Hires
Hired from Outside Parent Company34
4
1
3 3
1 1
05
1015
2025
3035
Num
ber o
f CVC
s
0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1Share of Temporary Assignments
Temporary Assignment from Parent Company
Senior Personnel - Sourcing
Survey Data
2%11%
34%53%
1 to 2 years
2 to 3 years
3 to 5 years
5 years or more
Senior Personnel - Expected Job Tenure
Survey Data
2%
98%
No
Yes
Salary
15%
85%
No
Yes
Bonus
88%
13%
No
Yes
Bonus similar to Carried Interest
79%
21%
No
Yes
Carried Interest
Senior Personnel - Compensation
Survey Data
20%
18%
31%
31%
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
CVC Investment Sponsor - R&D or Business Unit
Survey Data
52%39%
7%2%
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Angel Investors
20%
50%
26%4%
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Other CVCs
4%6%
38%51%
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Independent VCs
15%
28%
33%
24%
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Direct Company Solicitation
9%
30%
32%
30%
Not important
Somewhat important
Very important
Extremely important
Parent Company Business Units
Investment Sourcing
Survey Data
2%11%
23%
64%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Due Diligence - Utilize Personnel from Parent Company
Survey Data
45%
23%
25%
7%
NeverSometimesFrequentlyAlways
Voting Board Member
7%
18%
29%
47%
NeverSometimesFrequentlyAlways
Non-Voting Board Observer
CVC Representation on Portfolio Company Board
Survey Data
17%
83%
No
Yes
Attendance at Board Meetings
29%
71%
No
Yes
Written Reports from Management
31%
69%
No
Yes
Phone Calls with Technical Management
19%
81%
No
Yes
Phone Calls with Business Management
35%
65%
No
Yes
Regular Site Visits
56%44% No
Yes
Feedback from Parent Company Groups
92%
8%No
Yes
Other
Communication with Portfolio Companies
Survey Data
4%18%
56%
22%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Scientific Support
20%
38%
31%
11%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Engineering Support
14%
39%41%
7%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Management Support
11%
33%40%
16%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Marketing Support
39%
30%
27%3%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Other Commercialization Support
Provide Support to Portfolio Companies
Survey Data
14%
45%
41%
Not at allSmall extentModerate extentLarge extent
Access to Customers
11%
27%
43%
18%
Not at allSmall extentModerate extentLarge extent
Access to Suppliers
7%
59%
34%
Not at allSmall extentModerate extentLarge extent
Access to Partners
Provide Access for Portfolio Companies
Survey Data
13%
42%20%
18%
2%4%
0
1 to 3
4 to 6
7 to 15
16 to 30
More than 30
From CVC Direct Investments 2004-2006New Collaborations with Portfolio Companies
Survey Data
26%
74%
No
Yes
R&D Collaboration
81%
19%
No
Yes
Manufacturing Collaboration
45%55%
No
Yes
Licensing Collaboration
45%55%
No
Yes
Sales Collaboration
73%
27%
No
Yes
Other Collaboration
Types of Collaboration with Portfolio Companies
Survey Data
2% 15%
41%
41%Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Senior Management
4%
24%
47%
24%Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Technical Operations
2%
30%
46%
22%Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Business Operations
56%22%
11%11%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Other
Perceptions of CVC Value Contribution - Key Stakeholders
Survey Data
24%
28%
35%
13%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
CVC Activity Metrics
17%
15%
37%
30%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
CVC Output Metrics
CVC Performance Metrics - 1
Survey Data
9%
13%
31%
47%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Overall Financial Performanceof CVC Portfolio
9%
38%
33%
20%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
Specific Company Performancein CVC Portfolio
7%
24%
22%
48%
Not at all
Small extent
Moderate extent
Large extent
CVC Value Contributionto Parent Company
CVC Performance Metrics - 2
Survey Data
16%
14%
57%
5%9%
Increased significantlyIncreased moderatelyStayed about the sameDecreased moderatelyDecreased significantly
Past Funding 2004-2006
24%
43%
24%
9%
Increase significantlyIncrease moderatelyStay about the sameDecrease moderatelyDecrease significantly
Future Investment 2007-2009
CVC Trends