185 leeds parade, orange · 4.1 car parking ... 4.4 delivery and servicing ... food outlet, and...
TRANSCRIPT
Prepared for:
Jasbe Petroleum Group
3 December 2019
The Transport Planning Partnership
185 Leeds Parade, Orange
Traffic Impact Assessment
185 Leeds Parade, Orange
Traffic Impact Assessment
Client: Jasbe Petroleum Group
Version: V05
Date: 3 December 2019
TTPP Reference:18161
Quality Record
Version Date Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by Signature
V01 14/08/2019 Clinton Cheung,
Oasika Faiz Oasika Faiz Ken Hollyoak Ken Hollyoak
V02 19/08/2019 Oasika Faiz Oasika Faiz Ken Hollyoak Ken Hollyoak
V03 2/09/2019 Oasika Faiz Oasika Faiz Ken Hollyoak Ken Hollyoak
V04 4/09/2019 Oasika Faiz Oasika Faiz Ken Hollyoak Ken Hollyoak
V05 03/12/2019 Oasika Faiz Oasika Faiz Ken Hollyoak
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1
2 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Site Description ................................................................................................................. 2
2.2 Abutting Road Network ................................................................................................... 3
2.2.1 Leeds Parade ............................................................................................................ 4
2.2.2 Northern Distributor Road ........................................................................................ 4
2.3 Pedestrian and Cyclist Infrastructure ............................................................................. 4
2.4 Public Transport Facilities ................................................................................................. 5
3 Proposed Development ............................................................................................................. 6
3.1 Proposal Description ........................................................................................................ 6
3.2 Vehicle Access ................................................................................................................. 7
4 Parking Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 8
4.1 Car Parking ........................................................................................................................ 8
4.2 Drive-way Queueing Area .............................................................................................. 8
4.3 Accessible Parking Requirements .................................................................................. 9
4.4 Delivery and Servicing ..................................................................................................... 9
4.5 Car Parking Layout ........................................................................................................... 9
5 Traffic Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 10
5.1 Traffic Generation .......................................................................................................... 10
5.1.1 Fast Food Services .................................................................................................. 10
5.1.2 Service Station ......................................................................................................... 10
5.1.3 Summary .................................................................................................................. 12
5.2 Background Traffic Growth ........................................................................................... 13
5.3 Traffic Impact .................................................................................................................. 13
5.3.1 Traffic Distribution .................................................................................................... 13
5.3.2 Intersection Modelling Criteria .............................................................................. 14
5.3.3 Modelling Results ..................................................................................................... 15
6 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 16
Tables
Table 4.1: Car Parking Assessment ...................................................................................................... 8
Table 5.1: Service Station Traffic Generation ................................................................................... 12
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA ii
Table 5.2: Traffic Generation Summary ............................................................................................ 12
Table 5.3: Traffic Volumes per Hour ................................................................................................... 13
Table 5.4: Level of Service Criteria for Intersection Operation ...................................................... 15
Table 5.5: Intersection Operation – Year 2028 with Development ............................................... 15
Figures
Figure 2.1: Site Location ........................................................................................................................ 2
Figure 2.2: Indicative Site Boundary .................................................................................................... 3
Figure 2.3: Cycleway Map ................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 3.1: Proposed Site Layout ......................................................................................................... 6
Figure 3.2: New Access Road Connection ........................................................................................ 7
Figure 5.1: Morning Peak Hour Trips vs Number of Pumps .............................................................. 11
Figure 5.2: Evening Peak Hour Trips vs Number Pumps ................................................................... 11
Figure 5.3: Northern Distributor Road – Site Access Volumes ......................................................... 14
Figure 5.4: Leeds Parade – Site Access Volumes ............................................................................ 14
APPENDICES
A. SITE LAYOUT PLAN
B. SWEPT PATHS
C. SIDRA OUTPUTS
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 1
1 Introduction
This traffic impact assessment report relates to a proposed service station, drive-through fast
food outlet, and convenience store with associated car parking at 185 Leeds Parade,
Orange, NSW. A development application (DA) is to be lodged with Orange City Council
seeking approval for the proposed development.
The Transport Planning Partnership (TTPP) Pty Ltd has prepared this report on behalf of Jasbe
Petroleum Group to accompany the DA.
This report assesses the traffic and parking implications of the proposed development and is
set out as follows:
▪ Chapter 2 discusses the existing conditions including a description of the subject site
▪ Chapter 3 provides a brief description of the proposed development
▪ Chapter 4 assesses the proposed on-site parking provision and internal layout
▪ Chapter 5 examines the traffic generation and its impact, and
▪ Chapter 6 presents the conclusions of the assessment.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 2
2 Existing Conditions
2.1 Site Description
The subject site is located at 185 Leeds Parade, Orange and is currently a greenfield site. The
site has frontages along Northern Distributor Road and Leeds Parade along its northern and
eastern boundaries respectively.
A locality map of the subject site is provided in Figure 2.1 and the indicative site boundary is
shown in Figure 2.2.
Figure 2.1: Site Location
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 3
Figure 2.2: Indicative Site Boundary
It is noted that the site is part of a wider development encompassing two stages, with the
subject development forming Stage 1. The Stage 2 site is under development and subject to
a separate DA.
Land uses surrounding the subject site is comprised of industrial/ commercial uses to the east
along Northern Distributor Road, while the surrounding areas are generally low density
residential.
2.2 Abutting Road Network
The subject site is bounded by Leeds Parade to the east and Northern Distributor Road to the
north. A brief description of these roads is provided below.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 4
2.2.1 Leeds Parade
Leeds Parade is a two-way road supporting a carriageway of approximately 7.5m wide, with
one lane in either direction. Leeds Parade is generally aligned in a north south direction and
provides connectivity to Northern Distributor Road via a roundabout intersection at the north-
east corner of the site. The posted speed limit is 50km/h. No kerbside parking is permitted on
either side of the road.
2.2.2 Northern Distributor Road
Along the northern frontage of the subject site, Northern Distributor Road is generally aligned
in an east-west direction supporting a carriageway of approximately 7.5m wide with one lane
in either direction. The posted speed limit is 80km/h. No kerbside parking is permitted on either
side of the road.
2.3 Pedestrian and Cyclist Infrastructure
Pedestrian facilities are provided surrounding the land boundary along the eastern and
northern frontages providing good connectivity to the residential areas situated to the west
and south of the site.
Off-road cycle facilities are provided surrounding the subject site. The local cycle network
map is displayed in Figure 2.3.
Figure 2.3: Cycleway Map
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 5
2.4 Public Transport Facilities
Public transport facilities in Orange are limited with regional train services provided at Orange
Railway Station, approximately 3km south of the site, and private bus services including route
532 and 538 which have stops within 1km from the site.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 6
3 Proposed Development
3.1 Proposal Description
The proposed development, located at 185 Leeds Parade, involves the construction of a new
service station with a fast food restaurant and an ancillary convenience store. A full
breakdown of development is as follows:
▪ site area: 21,746.2m2
▪ proposed service station convenience store: 294m2
▪ two fast food restaurants with shared seating: 274m2
▪ fuel dispensing canopy with 4.7m height clearance for light vehicles and a fuel
dispensing canopy of 5.4m height clearance for heavy vehicles
▪ light vehicle fuel dispensers with capacity for eight light vehicles
▪ heavy vehicle fuel dispensers with capacity for three heavy vehicles (up to 19m AVs)
▪ 42 car parking spaces (including 2 accessible spaces), and
▪ 9 truck parking spaces (for up to 19m AVs).
The proposed site layout is shown in Figure 3.1 and provided in Appendix A.
Figure 3.1: Proposed Site Layout
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 7
3.2 Vehicle Access
It is noted that the site is part of a wider development encompassing two stages, with the
subject development forming Stage 1. The Stage 2 site is under development will be subject
to a separate DA. Stage 2 is likely to be developed into retail and commercial land uses.
Access into the Stage 1 and Stage 2 site will be provided via a new internal access road
which will run between Northern Distributor Road and Leeds Parade as indicatively shown in
Figure 3.2.
Figure 3.2: New Access Road Connection
The internal access road is to be developed as part of the Stage 1 development and would
include a;
▪ left-in/left-out intersection at the Northern Distributor Road, with a deceleration lane
provided for vehicles turning left into the site and acceleration lane for vehicles turning
left out of the site
▪ a give-way intersection at Leeds Parade with left-in and right-in deceleration lanes into
the site.
The access road itself will have one lane in each direction.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 8
4 Parking Assessment
4.1 Car Parking
The parking requirements for the Stage 1 development have been assessed against the
Orange City Council (Council) DCP 2004. Car parking requirements are set out within Part 15
Car Parking in the Orange City Council DCP 2004.
Car parking requirements for the proposed development are summarised in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1: Car Parking Assessment
Land Use
Size
Minimum DCP Rate Parking
Requirement
Parking
Provided GFA Seats
Service Station
Work Bays [1] - - 3 spaces per
workbay 0 0
Convenience Store 294m2 - 1 space per 25m2
GFA 12 12
Fast Food
Development with on-site
seating and drive-through
facilities
274m2 60 seats 1 space per 2 seats
(internal seating) 30 30
Total 42 42
[1] No work bays are proposed
Table 4.1 indicates that the proposed development is required to provide a minimum of 42
car parking spaces including 12 spaces for the proposed service station (and convenience
store) and 30 spaces for the proposed fast food premises.
The proposed development includes a proposed parking provision of 42 car parking spaces.
The proposed car parking provision is therefore compliant with Council’s minimum parking
requirements.
4.2 Drive-way Queueing Area
The DCP stipulates that for fast food outlets with drive-through facilities are to provide a
queueing area for 5 to 12 cars measured from the pick-up point and minimum of 4 car
spaces for cars queued from the ordering point.
The proposed drive-through facility has been designed to accommodate approximately 13-
14 vehicles from the food pick up point and approximately 5-6 vehicles from the ordering
point. In addition, one waiting bay is provided for drivers whose orders have longer wait times.
Therefore, the proposed drive-through facility has satisfactory vehicle queue storage area.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 9
4.3 Accessible Parking Requirements
Council’s DCP does not stipulate specific parking rates for accessible parking spaces. The
Building Code of Australia (BCA) recommends accessible parking spaces to be provided at a
rate of 1 space for every 50 car parking spaces or part thereof. Therefore, for a provision of 42
car spaces, the development is required one accessible space inclusive. It is proposed to
provide two accessible parking spaces, which complies with BCA requirements.
4.4 Delivery and Servicing
Council’s DCP does not stipulate specific parking rates for delivery and service vehicles,
however states that “provision is to be made on-site or at a convenient location for the type
of delivery or service vehicle appropriate to the type of development”.
On this basis, one loading bay area is proposed for the development, accommodating
vehicles up to a 12.5m Heavy Rigid Vehicle.
4.5 Car Parking Layout
The service station car park and associated access arrangements have been generally
designed in accordance with Australian Standard requirements, namely AS2890:2004. The
review included assessment of the following:
▪ access arrangements
▪ car park circulation, and
▪ parking spaces and aisle dimensions
All parking spaces are to be designed as Australian Standard Class 3A car parking spaces
(which have minimum dimensions of 2.6m wide by 5.4m long with aisle width of 6.6m).
The accessible parking spaces have been designed as per AS2890.6:2009 (with dimensions of
2.4m wide by 5.4m long and an adjacent shared space of equal dimensions with bollard).
A fuel dispensing canopy of 4.7m height clearance has been provided for light vehicles and
5.4m height clearance for heavy vehicles. The internal circulation within the development has
been designed to accommodate vehicles up to and including a 19m articulated vehicle. All
service vehicles would be able to enter and exit the site in a forward direction.
A swept path analysis has been conducted, which demonstrates vehicle accessibility to/from
and within the site to facilitate vehicles up to and including a 19m articulated vehicle. The
swept path analysis is provided in Appendix B.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 10
5 Traffic Assessment
5.1 Traffic Generation
5.1.1 Fast Food Services
The site provides two fast food restaurants including one with a drive-through facility. Given
that the restaurants are to share seating and amenities (i.e. toilets), it is anticipated that the
fast food component of the site would operate as one, that is, share customers. On this basis,
the traffic generation of the fast food component has been estimated as a single trip
attractor instead two sites with separate customers/ trips.
Traffic generation estimates for the proposed fast food premises have been assessed using
Transport for NSW’ Draft Guide to Transport Impact Assessments (March 2018) (herein, draft
TfNSW Guide). This includes information from updated studies from those contained in the RTA
Guide to Traffic Generating Developments 2002 on service stations across New South Wales.
For fast food restaurants, the draft TfNSW Guide provides sample survey data for three fast
food chains, namely McDonalds, KFC and Hungry Jacks. As such, for the purpose of this
analysis the more conservative traffic generation estimate has been adopted for the
proposed fast food restaurant i.e. McDonalds traffic generation.
As provided in the draft TfNSW Guide, the traffic generation estimates for a McDonalds
restaurant during the road network peak for a regional area, are as follows:
▪ AM Peak: 188 vehicle trips per hour
▪ PM Peak: 183 vehicle trips per hour.
The draft TfNSW Guide indicates that 51% of the above traffic generation is passing trade for
McDonalds restaurants.
An average of 50% passing trade has been adopted for the purposes of this assessment. On
this basis, the proposed fast food restaurant is estimated to generate a net increase of 94 and
92 trips per hour into the road network during the AM and PM peak periods respectively. An
additional 94 and 92 trips per hour is anticipated to be passer by vehicles undertaking a
detour via the site.
5.1.2 Service Station
Traffic generation estimates for service stations has been referenced from Roads and
Maritime Services Trip Generation Surveys, Service Stations, Analysis Report (2013) by TEF
Consulting.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 11
The Service Station Analysis Report has been produced for the draft TfNSW guide however,
the report provides greater detail than the draft TfNSW guide. This study undertaken for Roads
and Maritime Services includes survey data for a number of service stations, with varying
services. For recent Land & Environment Court cases, TTPP has undertaken a detailed analysis
of the survey sites that include a service station plus convenience store and have excluded
any that include additional provisions such as fast food restaurants, to obtain an
understanding of the traffic generation of service stations only.
Based on this data, the relationship between the number of peak hour vehicle trips and the
number of fuel pumps was determined as shown in Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2.
Figure 5.1: Morning Peak Hour Trips vs Number of Pumps
Figure 5.2: Evening Peak Hour Trips vs Number Pumps
10. BP
6. BP
3. Caltex
4. APW
8. Caltex W/W5. 7/11
7. Caltex W/W
y = 6.8092x + 47.445
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 5 10 15 20 25
Nu
mb
er
of
Trip
s
Number of Pumps
10. BP
6. BP
3. Caltex4. APW8. Caltex W/W
5. 7/11
7. Caltex W/W
y = 2.1532x + 123.81
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 5 10 15 20 25
Nu
mb
er
of
Trip
s
Number of Pumps
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 12
Based on the regression equations obtained from the graphs in Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2, the
estimated number of trips generated by the proposed development has been assessed.
Based on a capacity of 11 pumps (for eight light vehicles and three heavy vehicles), the trip
generation of the service station is summarised in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1: Service Station Traffic Generation
Land Use Size Trip Rate Traffic Generation
AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Service Station 11 Pumps (P) 6.8092 P + 47.445 2.1532 P+ 123.81 122 147
Based on the regression formulas as calculated in Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2, it is estimated that
the proposed development could generate up to 147 vehicle trips per hour during the busiest
peak period.
Further to this, the site is located on a classified road and is therefore expected to attract a
significant proportion of passing trade i.e. traffic already on the road network passing the site.
The RMS’s Guide indicates that passing trade for service stations would typically be at least
50% although surveys undertaken by TTPP at other service stations suggest that this can be in
the order of 59-71%.
However, as a conservative analysis using the 50% figure, the proposed service station could
be expected to generate a net additional 74 trips per hour during the peak periods to the
road network (i.e. new primary trips).
5.1.3 Summary
A summary of the estimated traffic generation arising from the proposed development is
provided in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2: Traffic Generation Summary
Development Traffic Generation
Passing Trade Additional Vehicle Trips
AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Service Station 122 147 50% 61 74
Fast Food 188 183 50% 94 91
Total 310 330 - 155 165
Table 5.2 indicates that the proposed development is expected to generate a total of 310-
330 vehicles per hour during the road network peak periods. This would include a net
increase of 155-165 vehicle trips per hour to the road network.
However, the above does not take into account multi-purpose trips between the fast food
restaurant and service station, with the fast food and service station anticipated to overlap in
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 13
customers. On this basis, the above traffic generation estimate is again noted to be
conservative.
5.2 Background Traffic Growth
On the above basis, Orange City Council has provided traffic counts for the year 2018 and
forecasted traffic volumes for the year 2028 from their Strategic Traffic Model for Orange.
These volumes are summarised in Table 5.3.
Table 5.3: Traffic Volumes per Hour
Road Peak
Year 2018 Traffic Counts Year 2028 Forecast Volumes
Northbound/
Westbound
Southbound/
Eastbound Total
Northbound/
Westbound
Southbound/
Eastbound Total
Leeds
Parade
AM Peak 322 254 576 450 313 763
PM Peak 271 361 632 274 471 745
Northern
Distributor
Road
AM Peak 694 436 1130 579 780 1359
PM Peak 766 528 1294 746 691 1437
5.3 Traffic Impact
The development traffic is to access the site from Northern Distributor Road via the proposed
left-in/left-out access. Preliminary discussions with Council have resolved that a left-in/left-out
access is most appropriate intersection layout.
5.3.1 Traffic Distribution
The proposed development traffic (Stage 1) has been distributed based on the following
assumptions:
▪ a 50% inbound/ 50% outbound split has assumed to enter and exit the site
▪ traffic has been distributed to/ from Northern Distributor Road and Leeds Parade based
on existing flows, that is, Northern Distributor Road carries on more traffic than Leeds
Parade. On the basis of the existing traffic flows, 65% of development traffic has been
assumed to arrive and depart to Northern Distributor Road.
▪ similarly, 65% of the estimated pass-by traffic is assumed to access the site via Northern
Distributor Road
▪ traffic at Leeds Parade has been distributed based on existing flows, with 60% travelling
northbound and 40% travelling southbound in the AM peak and vice versa in the PM
peak.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 14
A comparison of the forecasted volumes on Northern Distributor Road and Leeds Parade site
access points, for the Year 2028 Base (without development) and Year 2028 plus
Development is shown in Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 respectively.
Figure 5.3: Northern Distributor Road – Site Access Volumes
Figure 5.4: Leeds Parade – Site Access Volumes
5.3.2 Intersection Modelling Criteria
The site access has been assessed using SIDRA Intersection 8, a computer-based modelling
package which assesses intersection performance under prevailing traffic conditions.
SIDRA calculates intersection performance measures such as ‘average delay’ that vehicles
encounter and the level of service (LoS). SIDRA provides analysis of the operating conditions
which can be compared to the performance criteria set out in Table 5.4.
(691) 780
579 (746)
NA NA NA
NA
10 AM Peak Volumes
(10) PM Peak Volumes
Year 2028 Base
2
Site Access
Northern Distributor Rd
(691) 780
502 (664)
101 101 (107)
(107)
10 AM Peak Volumes
(10) PM Peak Volumes
Year 2028 plus Development Traffic
2
Site Access
Northern Distributor Rd
(274) 450
313 (471)
10 AM Peak Volumes
(10) PM Peak Volumes
Year 2028 Base
1
Site Access
Leeds Pde - NLeeds Pde - S
NA
NA NANA
(23) (35)
(23) 33 33 22
(262) 434
22 (35)
302 (454)
10 AM Peak Volumes
(10) PM Peak Volumes
Year 2028 plus Development Traffic
1
Site Access
Leeds Pde - NLeeds Pde - S
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 15
Table 5.4: Level of Service Criteria for Intersection Operation
Level of
Service
Average Delay
(seconds per vehicle) Traffic Signals, Roundabout Give Way and Stop Signs
A Less than 14 good operation good operation
B 15 to 28 good with acceptable delays
and spare capacity
acceptable delays and spare capacity
C 29 to 42 satisfactory satisfactory, but accident study
required
D 43 to 56 operating near capacity near capacity and accident study
required
E 57 to 70 at capacity
At signals, incidents will cause
excessive delays.
at capacity, requires other control
mode
F Greater than 71 unsatisfactory with excessive
queuing
unsatisfactory with excessive queuing;
requires other control mode
Source: Roads and Maritime Guide to Traffic Generating Developments, 2002
5.3.3 Modelling Results
The result of the SIDRA analysis of the Year 2028 with development is presented in Table 5.5
with detailed results provided in Appendix C.
Table 5.5: Intersection Operation – Year 2028 with Development
Intersection Intersection Approach
AM Peak PM Peak
Delay
(sec/veh)
Level of
Service
Delay
(sec/veh)
Level of
Service
Northern Distributor
Site Access
Northern Distributor - East 6 A 6 A
Site Access 6 A 6 A
Northern Distributor - West 0 A 0 A
Leeds Parade Site
Access
Leeds Parade – North 9 A 8 A
Site Access 15 B 15 A
Leeds Parade – South 7 A 7 A
Based on Table 5.5, the proposed site access points at Northern Distributor Road and Leeds
Parade would operate well with the proposed development traffic.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA 16
6 Conclusion
This traffic impact assessment report relates to a proposed service station, drive-through fast-
food outlet and convenience store with associated car parking at 185 Leeds Parade,
Orange. The key findings of the report are presented below.
▪ The development proposal seeks the construction of a new service station with a total of
four fuel dispensers for light vehicles (i.e. eight pumps) and heavy vehicle fuel dispensers
for three vehicles up to 19m AVs. The development also includes a drive-through fast
food outlet and parking for cars and trucks.
▪ The DCP requires the proposed development to provide 42 car parking spaces. It is
proposed to provide 42 cars spaces (including two accessible spaces) and nine truck
spaces. In addition, the driveway through fast food restaurant provides queuing room for
13-14 vehicles and is compliant with DCP requirements for driveway through facilities.
▪ The proposed parking facilities will be designed in accordance with design requirements
as set out in AS2890.
▪ Vehicle access to the development is off a new internal access road that would provide
access to a new retail and commercial precinct that includes the proposed
development as Stage 1. The internal access road is to be developed as part of the
Stage 1 development and would include a;
left-in/left-out intersection at the Northern Distributor Road, with a deceleration lane
provided for vehicles turning left into the site and acceleration lane for vehicles
turning left out of the site
a give-way intersection at Leeds Parade with left-in and right-in deceleration lanes
into the site.
▪ The proposed development is estimated to generate 310 and 330 vehicle trips per hour in
the morning and evening peak periods respectively, with a conservative volume 50%
anticipated to be pass-by trips.
▪ SIDRA Intersection modelling has been undertaken to assess the capacity of the site
access points at the Northern Distributor Road and Leeds Parade, with consideration of
background traffic growth to the year 2028. The modelling indicates that the proposed
site access points would operate well.
Overall, the traffic and parking aspects of the proposed development is considered to be
satisfactory.
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA Appendix A
Appendix A
Site Layout Plan
PROPOSED CONCRETE KERB TONEW LANDSCAPED AREA, TYPICAL
NEW CONCRETE FORECOURTAND DRIVEWAYS
4x NEW MPD DISPENSERS
NEW CROSSING
LOW LEVEL LANDSCAPING
L E
E D
S
P
A R
A D
E
3060
0
O/A
CAN
OPY
SITEEXIT
NEWLANDSCAPING
NEWLANDSCAPING
NEWLANDSCAPING
NEWLANDSCAPING
NEWLANDSCAPING
NEW
LAN
DSC
APIN
GWASTE
PLANT ROOM
1
5
9
15
3827
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9SITEENTRY
4500
7200
7200
7200
4500
SITE BOUNDARY
SITE BOUNDARY
SITE BOUNDARY
EXISTING FOOT PATH
1000
0SETB
ACK
2600TYP.
5400
TYP.
2400
2400
4463
0 O
/A B
UIL
DIN
G E
XTER
NAL
NEWCONCRETEFORECOURT
NEW CONCRETETRUCK PARKING
8000 O/ACANOPY
SITE IDSIGN
PROPOSED FUEL DISPENSING CANOPYWITH 4.7m CLEAR HEIGHT UNDERSIDE
PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW VENTS
NEWLANDSCAPING
SITE BOUNDARY
PROPOSED 3x 90kL COMPARTMENTEDUNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS
PROPOSED LOCATION OF NEW AIR /WATER POINT AND SIGN
UNDERCANOPY DRAINAGE TOENGINEERS DETAILS TYPICAL
PROPOSEDCARPARK
PROPOSEDTRUCK CANOPY
NEW TRUCKPARKING
1709
5 FR
OM
BOU
ND
ARY
CO
RN
ER
16565 0/A BUILDING
4947
0 M
IN.
10
NEW
L
AND
SCAP
ING
COLCOL
COLCOL
COLCOL
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW
KER
B
NEW
KER
B
NEW KERB
UADF
UADF
UADF
UADF
NEW
KER
B
NEW
KER
B
6
ICE
113°27'25" 64.795
118°02'30" 64.795
140°38'20" 35.355
154°10'35"
35.355
167°42'45"
35.355
181°15'00"
35.36
188°01'05"
22.075
193°33'35" 47.32
127°06'10" 35.355
MECHANICAL PLANT
MECHANICAL PLANT
3.0
3.0
1.51.5
1.51.5
PP
PP
PP
PP
OR
DER
POIN
T
LOADING /UNLOADINGAREA
BOL
BOL
NEW LOW LEVEL AUSTRALIANNATIVE PLANTS & PINE BARKMULCH
ENTR
YEN
TRY
DRIVETHRUENTRY
PROPOSED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDENTRY SIGNS
COLCOL
COL
COLCOL
COLCOLCOL
COL
COL
STAGE 1 DEVELOPED AREA INCLUDINGENTRY / EXIT ROAD WORKS
CH
ANG
E O
F G
RAD
E
14700 TANK FARM
1000
0SE
TBAC
K
1237
5TA
NK
FAR
M36
575
MIN
.
5400
SITE BOUNDARY
21,600 LITRE SPEL PURACEPTOR TOENGINEERS DETAILS
FL
PROPOSED ADF DISPENSING CANOPYWITH 5.4m CLEAR HEIGHT UNDERSIDE
2250
0 O
/A T
RU
CK
CAN
OPY
1500
6500
6500
6500
4 x NEW ADF DISPENSERS
25752850 2575
26000 TYP.
4000 TYP.27
508850 O/ACANOPY
350018503500
14075 DRIVEWAY
7850
30755 ℄
℄
SITEEXIT
NEW KERB
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
PROPOSED WASTE AREA FORFAST FOOD & RETAIL OUTLET
ORDER POINT AWNING
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
WAITINGBAY
16 22 23
39
42
276756000
1500
PICK UP/PAY POINT AWNING OVER
PROPOSED FAST FOOD ANDRETAIL OUTLET
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWERLINES TO BE RELOCATED
NEW GREASE ARRESTOR TOENGINEERS DETAILS
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
PROPOSED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDEXIT SIGNS
PROPOSED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDEXIT SIGNS
EXISTING CONCRETE FOOT PATH
PROPOSED 12m HIGH INTERNALLYILLUMINATED DOUBLE-SIDED SITE IDSIGN REFER DA01 SIGN 01
PROPOSED FUEL FILL POINTS
TURNINGBAY
38215
61730
22m 26
CAR
PAR
KIN
G
CAR
PAR
KIN
G
CAR PARKING
CAR PARKING
NEWLANDSCAPING
PROPOSEDCAR CANOPY
4624
0 M
IN.
1000
0 M
IN.
3315
0 M
IN.
3684
0 M
IN.
N O R T H E R N D I S T R I B U T O R R O A D
PP
PP
PP
PP
PP
OR
DER
POIN
T
12m HIGHINTERNALLYILLUMINATEDSITE ID SIGNAGE
GROUND LEVEL
SITE
BO
UN
DAR
Y
LED ILLUMINATEDPRICE NUMBERS
1200
0 O
/A
N O
R T
H E
R N
D
I S
T R
I B
U T
O R
R
O A
D
4000
450
ByAmendmentDateNo
RevisionDrawing No
A1 Scale A3 Scale Date DrawnProject
Client Drawing Title
ST LEONARDS NSW 2065
ABN 21 096 632 450
TELEPHONE:FACSIMILE:
www.mchp.com.au
SUITE 5, 38-46 ALBANY ST
02 9436 222202 9439 1340
JASBE PETROLEUM
PROPOSED SERVICE STATION + FAST FOOD LOT 4 DP 1185665 & LOT 5 DP 1065309185 LEEDS PARADEORANGE, NSW 2800
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
18-076 DA01 F
1:400 HALF A1 SCALE 16.04.2019 PP
A 03.05.2019 PRELIMINARY ISSUE PPB 24.05.2019 FLOOR PLAN REVISED PPC 28.05.2019 NOTES REVISED PPD 02.09.2019 REVISED ENTRY AND PARKING PPE 20.11.2019 REVISED ROAD AND SITE LAYOUT PPF 03.12.2019 REVISED CARPARK AS PER CONSULTANT COMMENTS PPFOR DEVELOPMENT
APPROVAL
0
metres
4 8 20 40
FAST FOODUSER 2
A1 SCALE: 1:400PROPOSED SITE PLAN
A1 SCALE: NTSKEY PLAN
N O R T H E R N D I S T R I B U T O R R O A D
L E
E D
S P
A R
A D
E
SITE BOUNDARY
SITE
BO
UN
DAR
Y
SITE
BO
UN
DAR
Y
SITE BOUNDARY
EXISTINGROUNDABOUT
FASTFOODUSER 1
TOTAL 708.5 m²
STAGE 1
TOTAL SITE AREA - 12.088 haSTAGE 1 DEVELOPED AREA - 21898 sqm approx.
BUILDING FOOTPRINT - 708.5 m²
1
2
3
4
50,000
40,000
30,000
60,000
PROPOSED TANK SCHEDULE
TANK PRODUCT LITRES DESCRIPTION
E10
NEW 90kL DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUNDFUEL TANK
Ad BLUE
PULP95
ULT98
NEW 90kL DOUBLE WALL UNDERGROUNDFUEL TANK
PUMP
CAR CANOPY 1/2, 3/4, 5/6, 7/8
DISPENSER SCHEDULE
PULP/E10/UADF/ULT
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION8 HOSE WAYNE5000 DISPENSERS
TRUCK CANOPY 9/14 UADF/Ad BLUE 2 & 4 HOSEDISPENSERS
5 90,000UADF NEW 90kL UNDERGROUND FUEL TANK
AREAS + PARKING
CAR PARKING: 42 SPACES(INCLUDING 2 ACC. SPACES)
TRUCK PARKING: 9 SPACES
FSL 884.00
LOT 4DP 1185665 AND
LOT 5 DP 1065309TOTAL SITE AREA
12.088 ha
LOT 4DP 1185665 AND
LOT 5 DP 1065309TOTAL SITE AREA
12.088 ha
OSD
AREA
PROPOSEDSERVICESTATION
CONVENIENCESTORE
LEGENDBOL BOLLARD STEELCOL COLUMN TO ENGINEERS DETAILSFL FLOOD LIGHT
INTERNALLY ILLUMINATEDSITE ID SIGN 01SCALE 1:100
01-
H:\M
CHP\
Jasb
e Petr
oleum
\Ora
nge\S
ervic
e Cen
tre an
d Mult
i Use
rs\20
19 D
A\Dr
awing
s\18-
076 D
A01 F
.dwg,
3/12/2
019 4
:40:16
PM,
cadfi
ve, A
utoCA
D PD
F (H
igh Q
uality
Prin
t).pc
3, IS
O ful
l blee
d A3 (
420.0
0 x 29
7.00 M
M), 1
:2
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA Appendix B
Appendix B
Swept Paths
L E
E D
S
P
A R
A D
E
3060
0
O/A
CAN
OPY
4500
7200
7200
7200
4500
1000
0SETB
ACK
2600TYP.
5400
TYP.
2400
2400
4463
0 O
/A B
UIL
DIN
G E
XTER
NAL
8000 O/ACANOPY
1709
5 FR
OM
BOU
ND
ARY
CO
RN
ER
16565 0/A BUILDING
4947
0 M
IN.
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW
KER
B
NEW
KER
B
NEW KERB
UADF
UADF
UADF
UADF
NEW
KER
B
NEW
KER
B
ICE
113°27'25" 64.795
118°02'30" 64.795
140°38'20" 35.355
154°10'35"
35.355
167°42'45"
35.355
181°15'00"
35.36
188°01'05"
22.075
127°06'10" 35.355
MECHANICAL PLANT
MECHANICAL PLANT
3.0
3.0
1.51.5
1.51.5
PP
PP
PP
PP
OR
DER
POIN
T
BOL
BOL
ENTR
YEN
TRY
COL
COL
COLCOL
COLCOL
COLCOL
COLCOL
14700 TANK FARM
1000
0SE
TBAC
K
1237
5TA
NK
FAR
M36
575
MIN
.
5400
2250
0 O
/A T
RU
CK
CAN
OPY
1500
6500
6500
6500
25752850 2575
26000 TYP.
4000 TYP.
2750
8850 O/ACANOPY
350018503500
14075 DRIVEWAY
7850
NEW KERB
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
276756000
1500
38215
61730
22m
4624
0 M
IN.
1000
0 M
IN.
3315
0 M
IN.
3684
0 M
IN.
N O R T H E R N D I S T R I B U T O R R O A DB-Double (25.0m)
B-Double (25.0m)
B-Double (25.0m)
B-Double (25.0m)B-Double (25.0m)
B-Double (25.0m)
B-Double (25.0m)
B-Double (25.0m)B-Double (25.0m)B-Double (25.0m)
B-Double (25.0m)
B-Double (25.0m)B-Double (25.0m)
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M
2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M
DATE STAMP
PROJECT No. REV.
TITLE
REV. DESCRIPTION APP'D DATECHECK DWG No.PROJECTDRAWN
SCALE
FIGURE 1
03 DECEMBER 2019
18161 1:700 @A3 A
185 LEEDS ROAD, ORANGE
SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS25m B-DOUBLE
A ISSUE FOR DISCUSSION KM OF KH 03/12/1918161CAD005
File
nam
e: 1
8161
CAD
005-
CAR
PAR
K R
EVIE
W-1
9120
3.dw
gD
ate:
3 D
ecem
ber 2
019
By: K
arl.m
agis
trado
KEY:
Wheel path
Body envelope
300mm clearance
Forward Reverse
1250010860
6210
Max 72° HorizMax 6° Vert
8100 1300 1300 1600
Max 72° HorizMax 6° Vert
6800 1300 1300560
46001000 3350 1300
B-Double (25.0m)Overall Length 25000mmOverall Width 2500mmOverall Body Height 4300mmMin Body Ground Clearance 540mmTrack Width 2500mmLock-to-lock time 6.00sCurb to Curb Turning Radius 15000mm
3060
0
O/A
CAN
OPY
4500
7200
7200
7200
4500
5400
TYP.
2400
2400
16565 0/A BUILDING
4947
0 M
IN.
COLCOL
COLCOL
COLCOL
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW
KER
B
UADF
UADF
NEW
KER
B
NEW
KER
B
ICE
140°38'20" 35.355
MECHANICAL PLANT
MECHANICAL PLANT
3.0
3.0
1.51.5
1.51.5
OR
DER
POIN
TBOL
BOL
ENTR
YEN
TRY
COL
COL
COL
COLCOL
COL
COLCOL
14700 TANK FARM
1237
5TA
NK
FAR
M36
575
MIN
.
5400
2250
0 O
/A T
RU
CK
CAN
OPY
1500
6500
6500
8850 O/ACANOPY
350018503500
14075 DRIVEWAY
PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
276756000
38215
61730
22m
4624
0 M
IN.
3315
0 M
IN.
3684
0 M
IN.
B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)
B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)
B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)
B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)
B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M
2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M
DATE STAMP
PROJECT No. REV.
TITLE
REV. DESCRIPTION APP'D DATECHECK DWG No.PROJECTDRAWN
SCALE
FIGURE 2
03 DECEMBER 2019
18161 1:400 @A3 A
185 LEEDS ROAD, ORANGE
SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS5.2m B99 VEHICLE
A ISSUE FOR DISCUSSION KM OF KH 03/12/1918161CAD005
File
nam
e: 1
8161
CAD
005-
CAR
PAR
K R
EVIE
W-1
9120
3.dw
gD
ate:
3 D
ecem
ber 2
019
By: K
arl.m
agis
trado
KEY:
Wheel path
Body envelope
300mm clearance
Forward Reverse
5200
950 3050
B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)Overall Length 5200mmOverall Width 1940mmOverall Body Height 1878mmMin Body Ground Clearance 272mmTrack Width 1840mmLock-to-lock time 4.00sCurb to Curb Turning Radius 6250mm
3060
0
O/A
CAN
OPY
4500
7200
7200
7200
4500
5400
TYP.
2400
2400
16565 0/A BUILDING
4947
0 M
IN.
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW
KER
B
UADF
UADF
ICE
MECHANICAL PLANT
MECHANICAL PLANT
1.51.5
1.51.5
BOL
BOL
ENTR
YEN
TRY
COL
COL
COLCOL
COLCOL
COLCOL
14700 TANK FARM
1237
5TA
NK
FAR
M36
575
MIN
.
5400
2250
0 O
/A T
RU
CK
CAN
OPY
1500
6500
6500
8850 O/ACANOPY
350018503500
14075 DRIVEWAY
NEW KERB
276756000
38215
61730
22m
3315
0 M
IN.
3684
0 M
IN.
HRV - Heavy Rigid Vehicle
HRV - Heavy Rigid Vehicle
HRV - Heavy Rigid Vehicle
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M
2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M
3060
0
O/A
CAN
OPY
4500
7200
7200
7200
4500
5400
TYP.
2400
2400
16565 0/A BUILDING
4947
0 M
IN.
COLCOL
COLCOL
COLCOL
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW KERB
NEW
KER
B
UADF
UADF
ICE
MECHANICAL PLANT
MECHANICAL PLANT
1.51.5
1.51.5
BOL
BOL
ENTR
YEN
TRY
COL
COL
COLCOL
COLCOL
COLCOL
14700 TANK FARM
1237
5TA
NK
FAR
M36
575
MIN
.
5400
2250
0 O
/A T
RU
CK
CAN
OPY
1500
6500
6500
8850 O/ACANOPY
350018503500
14075 DRIVEWAY
NEW KERB
276756000
38215
61730
22m
3315
0 M
IN.
3684
0 M
IN.
HRV - Heavy Rigid VehicleHRV - Heavy Rigid VehicleHRV - Heavy Rigid Vehicle
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M
2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M
2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M 2.6M
DATE STAMP
PROJECT No. REV.
TITLE
REV. DESCRIPTION APP'D DATECHECK DWG No.PROJECTDRAWN
SCALE
FIGURE 3
03 DECEMBER 2019
18161 1:400 @A3 A
185 LEEDS ROAD, ORANGE
SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS12.5m HEAVY RIGID VEHICLE - LOADING/UNLOADING AREA
A ISSUE FOR DISCUSSION KM OF KH 03/12/1918161CAD005
File
nam
e: 1
8161
CAD
005-
CAR
PAR
K R
EVIE
W-1
9120
3.dw
gD
ate:
3 D
ecem
ber 2
019
By: K
arl.m
agis
trado
VEHICLE ENTERING
KEY:
Wheel path
Body envelope
300mm clearance
Forward Reverse
12500
2400 5900 1400
HRV - Heavy Rigid VehicleOverall Length 12500mmOverall Width 2500mmOverall Body Height 4300mmMin Body Ground Clearance 417mmTrack Width 2500mmLock-to-lock time 6.00sCurb to Curb Turning Radius 12500mm
VEHICLE EXITING
18161-R01V05-191203 TIA Appendix B
Appendix C
SIDRA Outputs
MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: 101 [2028 AM Leeds Parade]
Site Category: -Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - VehiclesDemand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov
ID Turn Deg.
SatnAverage
Delay Level ofService
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Aver. No.Cycles
AverageSpeed Total HV Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m km/hNorthEast: Leeds Parade8 T1 318 8.0 0.173 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.99 R2 23 1.0 0.028 9.3 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.49 0.70 0.49 50.6Approach 341 7.5 0.173 0.6 NA 0.1 0.7 0.03 0.05 0.03 76.8
NorthWest: Proposed Road10 L2 23 1.0 0.029 6.9 LOS A 0.1 0.7 0.46 0.64 0.46 50.312 R2 35 1.0 0.110 14.9 LOS B 0.4 2.7 0.73 0.88 0.73 45.7Approach 58 1.0 0.110 11.7 LOS A 0.4 2.7 0.62 0.78 0.62 47.4
SouthWest: Leeds Parade1 L2 35 1.0 0.019 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.63 0.00 64.42 T1 457 8.0 0.246 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.9Approach 492 7.5 0.246 0.5 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.04 0.00 78.4
All Vehicles 891 7.1 0.246 1.3 NA 0.4 2.7 0.05 0.09 0.05 74.4
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (RTA NSW). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement.Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delayis not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements.SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.
SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TTPP - THE TRANSPORT PLANNING PARTNERSHIP | Processed: Monday, 19 August 2019 3:41:46 PMProject: X:\18161 185 Leeds Road, Orange NSW Jasbe Petroleum\07 Modelling Files\18161-Proposed Northern Distributor Access-190814.sip8
MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: 101 [2028 AM Peak - Northern Distributor Rd-Site Access]
Year 2028 plus Development TrafficAM PeakSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - VehiclesDemand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov
ID Turn Deg.
SatnAverage
Delay Level ofService
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Aver. No.Cycles
AverageSpeed Total HV Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m km/hSouth: Site Access1 L2 106 1.0 0.058 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 0.00 54.9Approach 106 1.0 0.058 5.6 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 0.00 54.9
East: Northern Distributor Rd - E4 L2 106 1.0 0.058 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 0.00 54.95 T1 557 8.0 0.300 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 663 6.9 0.300 0.9 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.08 0.00 59.0
West: Northern Distributor Rd - W11 T1 821 8.0 0.443 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 821 8.0 0.443 0.1 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9
All Vehicles 1591 7.1 0.443 0.8 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.07 0.00 59.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (RTA NSW). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement.Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delayis not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements.SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.
SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TTPP - THE TRANSPORT PLANNING PARTNERSHIP | Processed: Monday, 19 August 2019 3:41:46 PMProject: X:\18161 185 Leeds Road, Orange NSW Jasbe Petroleum\07 Modelling Files\18161-Proposed Northern Distributor Access-190814.sip8
MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: 101 [2028 PM Leeds Parade]
Site Category: -Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - VehiclesDemand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov
ID Turn Deg.
SatnAverage
Delay Level ofService
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Aver. No.Cycles
AverageSpeed Total HV Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m km/hNorthEast: Leeds Parade8 T1 478 8.0 0.260 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.99 R2 37 1.0 0.035 8.1 LOS A 0.1 1.0 0.38 0.64 0.38 51.4Approach 515 7.5 0.260 0.6 NA 0.1 1.0 0.03 0.05 0.03 76.7
NorthWest: Proposed Road10 L2 37 1.0 0.037 5.8 LOS A 0.1 0.9 0.35 0.57 0.35 51.012 R2 24 1.0 0.076 14.5 LOS A 0.3 1.8 0.72 0.87 0.72 46.0Approach 61 1.0 0.076 9.2 LOS A 0.3 1.8 0.50 0.69 0.50 48.8
SouthWest: Leeds Parade1 L2 24 1.0 0.013 7.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.63 0.00 64.42 T1 276 8.0 0.149 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.9Approach 300 7.4 0.149 0.6 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.05 0.00 78.3
All Vehicles 876 7.0 0.260 1.2 NA 0.3 1.8 0.05 0.09 0.05 74.0
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (RTA NSW). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement.Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delayis not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements.SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.
SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TTPP - THE TRANSPORT PLANNING PARTNERSHIP | Processed: Monday, 19 August 2019 3:41:47 PMProject: X:\18161 185 Leeds Road, Orange NSW Jasbe Petroleum\07 Modelling Files\18161-Proposed Northern Distributor Access-190814.sip8
MOVEMENT SUMMARYSite: 101 [2028 PM Peak - Northern Distributor Rd-Site Access]
Year 2028 plus Development TrafficPM PeakSite Category: (None)Giveway / Yield (Two-Way)
Movement Performance - VehiclesDemand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov
ID Turn Deg.
SatnAverage
Delay Level ofService
Prop. Queued
Effective Stop Rate
Aver. No.Cycles
AverageSpeed Total HV Vehicles Distance
veh/h % v/c sec veh m km/hSouth: Site Access1 L2 113 1.0 0.061 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 0.00 54.9Approach 113 1.0 0.061 5.6 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 0.00 54.9
East: Northern Distributor Rd - E4 L2 113 1.0 0.061 5.6 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.53 0.00 54.95 T1 728 8.0 0.393 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 841 7.1 0.393 0.8 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.07 0.00 59.2
West: Northern Distributor Rd - W11 T1 727 8.0 0.392 0.1 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9Approach 727 8.0 0.392 0.1 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.9
All Vehicles 1681 7.1 0.393 0.8 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.07 0.00 59.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay (RTA NSW). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay per movement.Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all vehicle movements.NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delayis not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements.SIDRA Standard Delay Model is used. Control Delay includes Geometric Delay.Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation.
SIDRA INTERSECTION 8.0 | Copyright © 2000-2019 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.comOrganisation: TTPP - THE TRANSPORT PLANNING PARTNERSHIP | Processed: Monday, 19 August 2019 3:41:46 PMProject: X:\18161 185 Leeds Road, Orange NSW Jasbe Petroleum\07 Modelling Files\18161-Proposed Northern Distributor Access-190814.sip8
The Transport Planning Partnership
Suite 402 Level 4, 22 Atchison Street
St Leonards NSW 2065
P.O. Box 237
St Leonards NSW 1590
02 8437 7800
www.ttpp.net.au