1997 traffix benchmark marketing research findings presented by the marketing source, inc
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING
RESEARCH FINDINGS
Presented by
THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC
![Page 2: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Research Objectives
Identify benchmark measurements among commuters that can be used to track:
– awareness and familiarity of TRAFFIX
– support for ridesharing
– willingness to rideshare
Profile the target audience
Identify the role of employers
![Page 3: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Two Research Components
1. Commuter Study among residents in the TRAFFIX service area.
2. Employer Case Studies among targeted employers.
![Page 4: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Commuter Study
![Page 5: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Methodology
Commuter Study– Phone surveys
» 825 Southeastern Virginia commuters
» 18-65 years old
» worked at least 3 days per week outside their home
– Interview dates: July 1-15, 1997– Margin of error : +/- 3.5 percentage points.
![Page 6: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
TRAFFIX Service Area
Southside:Virginia Beach
Norfolk
Chesapeake
Portsmouth
Suffolk
Isle of Wight Co.
Southampton Co.
Franklin
Peninsula:Newport News
Hampton
York Co.
James City Co.
Gloucester Co.
King William Co.
Williamsburg
Poquoson
Essex Co.
Middlesex Co.
Mathews Co.
King & Queen Co.
West Point
Tappahannock
Urbanna
Eastern ShoreAccomack Co.
Northampton Co.
![Page 7: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Whom did we interview?
Average length of residency: 17 years.
48% male / 52% female 88% employed full-time;
12% employed part-time Average distance to work:
13 miles (one-way) Average commute time:
21 minutes (one-way) 22% are personally responsible for
dropping off/picking up children from child care.
Virginia Beach25%
Norfolk15%
Newport News/
Hampton19%
Other23%
Place of Residence Sample Characteristics
Chesapeake/Portsmouth
18%
![Page 8: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Commute to Work
What are the commuting patterns?How are residents commuting to work?
Do they believe traffic congestion is a problem?
![Page 9: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The majority of commuters work in the area where they live.
Commute Patterns:
(Work)
(Home) VA Beach Norfolk Chesapeake N. News Hampton Other Total
(Base) (207) (121) (91) (88) (69)
VA Beach 60% 26% 5% 2% 1% 6% 100%
Norfolk 9 74 3 5 2 7 100
Chesapeake 11 30 50 - - 9 100
Newport News - 8 1 61 15 15 100
Hampton 4 6 0 17 70 3 100
![Page 10: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Nearly 9 out of 10 (88%) residents drive alone for their work commute.
Drive Alone (SOV*) 88%Ride in a carpool 8Take a bus 2Ride a bike 1Ride in a vanpool <1Walk <1
SOV : Single Occupant Driver
![Page 11: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Over half of commuters agree that traffic congestion is a problem during their work commute.
“Not a problem”
(1-5 ratings)43%
“A problem”(6-10 ratings)
57%
![Page 12: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
39% of residents agree that traffic congestion is a big problem.
About 4 in 10 commuters believe there is a “big” traffic congestion problem during their work commute.
![Page 13: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Commuters in metropolitan areas are more likely
to rate traffic congestion as a “big problem”.
Traffic is a “Big Residence (Base) Problem”
Norfolk (121) 53%
VA Beach (207) 47
Newport News (88) 40
Hampton (69) 39
Chesapeake (91) 35
Other Peninsula (113) 33
Other Southside (113) 19
Eastern Shore (23)* 13
![Page 14: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Commute to Work: Findings
Most commuters travel to work in the areas where they live. However, Norfolk pulls from numerous areas; likely due to the draw of the military and downtown district.
Compared to other markets, there is a high proportion of SOV commuters.
A majority of commuters recognize that traffic is a problem.
Commuters in metropolitan areas are more likely to rate traffic congestion as a “big problem.”
![Page 15: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Attitudes about Ridesharing
What factors are important in mode choice?What are the perceived barriers and benefits of ridesharing?What’s important and believable to SOV commuters about the
benefits of ridesharing?
![Page 16: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Among commuters, travel time and flexibility are key factors in determining mode choice.
Ability to use car for work-related trips
Ability to run middayerrands/lunch
Transportation costs
Flexibility to arrive/leave whenI want
Travel time
47% 14%
46% 22%
46% 25%
64% 18%
66% 18%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Ability to use car for work-related trips
Ability to run middayerrands/lunch
Transportation costs
Flexibility to arrive/leave whenI want
Travel time
Very important Somewhat important
84%
82%
71%
68%
61%
![Page 17: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SOV drivers “believe” they need their car during
the work day.
-------% Important------Factors that play a role Alternatein mode choice SOV drivers mode users Difference(Base) (730) (95)
Travel time to work 84% 87% -3
Commuting costs 72% 74% -2
Flexibility to arrive/leave 84% 71% +13work when you want
Ability to leave work to 68% 56% +12run personal errands/lunch
Use car for work-related trips 64% 43% +21
![Page 18: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Most commuters agree that ridesharing helps the environment and lowers transportation costs.
Residents who share a ride to work...
13% 9%
18% 9%
23% 18%
27% 14%
58% 15%
59% 14%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
"5" (Strongly Agree) "4" Ratings22%
73%
73%
help the environment
lower their transportationcosts
are more likely to arriveat work on time
are less stressed at work
get to work faster
are more productive at work
27%
41%
41%
![Page 19: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Drive-alone commuters need to be educated
about the benefits of ridesharing.
-------% who agree------Those who share a ride Alternateto work… SOV drivers mode users Difference(Base) (730) (95)
have lower transportation 73% 73% 0 costs
help the environment 72 78 -6
are less stressed at work 39 48 -9
get to work faster 26 39 -13
are more productive 19 35 -16at workare more likely to arrive 39 55 -16at work on time
![Page 20: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
What’s important AND believable to SOV drivers?
Among SOV drivers, saving money is both important and a believable benefit of ridesharing.
Yet, while a majority (84%) of SOV commuters say that commute time is also important in their mode choice, only 26% believe that ridesharing saves time.
Save time
Savemoney
26%
84%
73%
72%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Save time
Savemoney
Importance
Believability
![Page 21: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The number one barrier to ridesharing among SOV drivers is not knowing anyone to share a ride with.
![Page 22: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Why do you not share a ride to work? (SOV drivers)
Don’t know anyone to 43%share a ride with
Inconvenient21%
Inflexible schedule20%
Need my vehicle during12%the day
Like freedom/solitude 9%
Have a short commute 6%
![Page 23: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Attitudes about Ridesharing: Findings
SOV commuters want the flexibility to arrive and leave work when they want.
A number of commuters believe that they need their car for mid-day and work-related trips.
SOV drivers believe that ridesharing saves money and helps the environment, but they are not convinced of the other benefits of sharing a ride to work.
Reducing transportation costs is both an important factor and a “believable” benefit of ridesharing.
The number one reason for not ridesharing is “ not knowing anyone to share a ride with”.
![Page 24: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Identifying the Target Audience
Who is already using alternate modes?Who are the SOV commuters who are most likely to try ridesharing?
What is the alternate mode preferred?How do incentives affect willingness to use alternate modes?
![Page 25: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
One in ten (12%) commuters are already using alternate modes.
Drive alone88%
Alternate mode users12%
• be more likely to rate traffic congestion as a “big” problem (50% vs. 37%)
• have longer commute times and distances.
• have lower annual household incomes.
• be less likely to hold managerial/administrative occupations.
Current alternate mode users tend to ...
![Page 26: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Among alternate mode users, the primary motive to rideshare is saving money.
Why do you share a ride to work? (alternate mode users)
Save money 38%
Do not have a car 19%
Enjoy the company of others 17%
Saves time 13%
Avoid traffic congestion 6%
Reduce wear/tear on car 5%
Use HOV lanes 4%
![Page 27: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
About one-fifth (19%) of SOV commuters are at least somewhat likely to occasionally use an alternate mode.
Very likely6%
Not very likely33%
Somewhat likely13%
Not at all likely49%
Those who are likely to occasionally use an alternate mode tend to …
• be more likely to live or work in Norfolk.
• have lived in the area a shorter period of time.
• believe that ridesharing reduces stress and travel costs and increases job productivity.
• be more likely to have seen advertising promoting ridesharing.
SOV Commuters
![Page 28: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Incentives significantly heighten interest in ridesharing among many SOV commuters.
Ridematching
Reserved parking
Guaranteed Ride
Employer subsidies
Base SOV interest
19% 13%
22% 10%
21% 13%
30% 15%
6% 13%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Ridematching
Reserved parking
Guaranteed Ride
Employer subsidies
Base SOV interest
"5" (Very willing) "4" Ratings
32%
45%
32%
34%
19%
Percent SOV drivers willing to occasionally use alternate modes
![Page 29: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Incentives will likely increase the frequency of ridesharing among current alternate mode users.
Ridematching
Guaranteed Ride
Reserved parking
Employer subsidies
35% 15%
39% 14%
41% 12%
53% 16%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Ridematching
Guaranteed Ride
Reserved parking
Employer subsidies
"5" (Very willing) "4" Ratings
53%
69%
50%
53%
Percent alternate mode users willing to rideshare more frequently
![Page 30: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Employer-sponsored programs significantly boost willingness to try alternate modes.
When asked if they would rideshare occasionally/more often if their employer
sponsored and supported rideshare programs, a majority (67%) of commuters indicated
they would do so.
![Page 31: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Carpools are the most attractive form of ridesharing for these SOV commuters.
Most likely Least likely to use to use
Ride in a carpool 50% 10%
Take a bus 16 50
Bike 16 3
Ride in a vanpool 7 7
Walk 7 22
Other 4 8
![Page 32: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Identifying the Target Audience: Findings
Alternate mode users tend to have longer commutes and most often say they rideshare to save money.
SOV commuters who express interest in ridesharing are more “in tune” with the benefits of sharing a ride and are more likely to report seeing advertising. They also tend to be newer to the area and more likely to live or work in the Norfolk area.
Incentives boost willingness to try ridesharing among SOV drivers, particularly those with lower incomes.
Incentives are likely to increase frequency and ultimately retention among alternate mode users.
Carpools are overwhelmingly the preferred alternate mode of choice among SOV drivers.
![Page 33: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
How do we reach the target audience?
What is the current awareness level?What is the most successful source?What should the key messages be?
![Page 34: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
One-half (54%) of commuters have seen or heard information about ridesharing or commuter services.
Other
Brochures
Newspaper
Radio
Television
Road sign
6%
4%
14%
30%
37%
41%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%
Other
Brochures
Newspaper
Radio
Television
Road sign
Source of information(among those aware)
![Page 35: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Unaided awareness of TRAFFIX is low; most likely due to the newness of the organization.
Organizations mentioned (unaided)
TRT 15%
VDOT 6%
PENTRAN 3%
TRAFFIX 2%
Others 6%
Could not recall 34%
Unaware of any 36%
Only a few (5%) commuters can recall any phone numbers of these organizations.
![Page 36: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
2% unaided awareness
13% aided awareness
Aware of
Ridesharing Aware of
Locality (Base) Info. TRAFFIXVA Beach (207) 61% 18%Hampton (69) 61 17Norfolk (121) 58 13Newport News (88) 58 21Chesapeake (91) 47 15
Overall, fifteen percent (15%) of commuters say they have heard of TRAFFIX.
![Page 37: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Media Expenditures for TRAFFIX
A/V8%
Other9%
Radio26%
Newspaper16%
P.R.4%
Television37%
Source: Hambright, Calcagno & Downing
![Page 38: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
How did commuters learn about TRAFFIX?
Radio
Television
Road sign
Newspaper
Family/friends
Brochures
Employer 2%
3%
7%
12%
20%
24%
39%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Radio
Television
Road sign
Newspaper
Family/friends
Brochures
Employer
Those who are aware of TRAFFIX most often report they learned about the organization on the radio (39%) or television (24%).
Very few commuters are learning about TRAFFIX through their employer.
![Page 39: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Among those who are aware of TRAFFIX, many are unfamiliar with the programs available.
Ridematching
Park & Ride lots
Guaranteed Ride
Express Bus service
Bus routes/schedules
Employer programs 27%
39%
39%
41%
42%
46%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Ridematching
Park & Ride lots
Guaranteed Ride
Express Bus service
Bus routes/schedules
Employer programs
% aware
![Page 40: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Reaching the Target Audience: Findings
While over half of commuters have seen or heard promotion for ridesharing, awareness levels for specific organizations are low.
Awareness levels of TRAFFIX are low; most likely due to the short time in the market and lack of a recent promotional effort.
Most of those aware of TRAFFIX identify the radio or television as the media source. This is consistent with the media plan.
Of those aware of TRAFFIX, most are unfamiliar with the services offered.
![Page 41: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Commuter StudyConclusions
![Page 42: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Conclusions: Commuter Study
The groundwork is there…. Commuters perceive a real problem with traffic in
metropolitan areas. Commuters believe that those who rideshare help the
environment and lower their transportation costs. There are signs of some willingness to change the
mode of travel; however…
Conversion of SOV drivers will be difficult.
![Page 43: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Conclusions: Commuter Study (continued)
Flexibility is very important to SOV drivers.
Drive alone commuters also believe that they need their car during the day. This may be a real or perceived need.
Time is the most important factor that SOV drivers consider in mode choice. However, they are not convinced that ridesharing saves time.
The number 1 barrier to ridesharing is, “I don’t know anyone to rideshare with.”
Commuters are not sure where to turn for help.
Obstacles to SOV conversion are strong:
![Page 44: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Employer Case Studies
![Page 45: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Methodology
Employer Case Studies
– In-depth telephone interviews
– 45 targeted employers for TRAFFIX
– Qualitative, not quantitative interpretation
– Interviewed policy makers
– Interview dates: July 22 - August 7, 1997
![Page 46: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Sample for Employer Case Studies
A total of 98 employer contacts were supplied by TRAFFIX. Of these...
– 45 completed the survey.
– 21 declined to participate.
– 19 were unavailable.
– 9 said company policy was set elsewhere.
– 3 businesses could not be found.
– 1 company was out of business.
![Page 47: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Among those who completed the survey, nearly a quarter have 50 or less employees.
50 or less 2451-100 13101-200 11201-500 22501 or more 29
Number of employees %
Most had been approached by TRAFFIX.
![Page 48: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Employer Findings
Are employees receptive to employer-sponsored programs? How do employers view ridesharing?
How do employers feel about offering commuter programs?What programs are being offered?
![Page 49: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Corporate philosophy
Most employers agree with the following:– The company always considers how decisions will
impact employee morale.
– Employee productivity is the company’s primary focus when making decisions.
– The company’s public image is strongly considered when determining corporate policies.
– The company believes a business that offers good benefits to its employees will maintain a more productive workforce.
![Page 50: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Perceptions about traffic congestion
The majority say that traffic congestion is a problem around their worksite.
Most agree that their business has some impact on traffic congestion in the area.
![Page 51: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Perceived benefits of ridesharing
Like commuters, employers feel that ridesharing helps the environment and lowers transportation costs.
They are not convinced that employees who use alternate modes get to work faster, are more productive at work, or make better employees.
![Page 52: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Awareness of Rideshare Organizations
A majority of businesses have seen or heard information promoting ridesharing.
Like commuters, employers cited radio and television most often as sources of this information.
As with commuters, few employers could identify any phone numbers associated with rideshare organizations.
![Page 53: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Awareness of TRAFFIX Recognition of TRAFFIX was high among the targeted employers. Employers most often cited a TRAFFIX representative as the
source for learning about the organization. Businesses interviewed believe that the primary functions of
TRAFFIX are to reduce traffic congestion and facilitate ridesharing.
The majority of companies were aware that TRAFFIX:
– conducts an employee survey.– establishes a ridematching database.– assists in the formation of carpool/vanpool programs.– does not charge for its services.
![Page 54: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Willingness to offer employer-sponsored commuter programs
Generally, employers are willing to help with their employees’ commute, but few are willing to pay for such programs.
Employers are most willing to offer:– reserved parking spaces for carpools/vanpools
– ridematching
– a guaranteed ride program
– flexible work hours
![Page 55: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Conclusions: Employer Study
Targeted employers seem to agree that traffic congestion is a problem and that their business has impact on the problem.
Employers appear to share many of the same attitudes about ridesharing as commuters.
Most of the targeted employers had been approached by TRAFFIX and were familiar with the organization.
Intent to offer commuter programs to employees is moderate.
![Page 56: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Recommendations
![Page 57: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
The goal is TRIAL.
![Page 58: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Educate commuters.
Educate commuters about...– the benefits of ridesharing (saves time, less
stress, arrive at work on time, etc.).– incentives programs that are already available
(guaranteed ride program and ridematching).
![Page 59: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Reach the target customer.
Blanket promotional efforts to the service area to increase overall awareness of TRAFFIX.
Pay special attention to commuters who…
– have lower household incomes.
– commute longer distances to work.
– live or work in Norfolk.
– are new residents (New Movers programs, utility hook-ups, new military transfers).
![Page 60: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Advertising Recommendations Promote…
– the cost savings from ridesharing.– the Guaranteed Ride program and the use of fleet cars
among large companies to address flexibility barriers.– time savings (i.e. testimonials/HOV lanes).– carpooling as the major alternate mode.– ridematching to confront the issue of “no one to
rideshare with”.– the TRAFFIX name and not the phone number.
![Page 61: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Employer Outreach Recommendations
Reconsider the way employers are targeted. Contact largest employers first and consider special targeted efforts in Norfolk.
Thorough research should be conducted on potential employers prior to approaching them.
A market plan should be developed. Encourage companies who are resistant to offer
commuter programs to “start small” in their efforts.
![Page 62: 1997 TRAFFIX BENCHMARK MARKETING RESEARCH FINDINGS Presented by THE MARKETING SOURCE, INC](https://reader034.vdocuments.net/reader034/viewer/2022051416/56649ece5503460f94bdbc1e/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Future Research
Repeat the benchmark study after a promotional campaign to see the impact of advertising.
Interview the remaining large employers, particularly those that have not yet been approached.
Conduct focus groups among employers. Omnibus study to monitor results.