1may 14, 2014 uncertainties in projections of ozone- depleting substances and alternatives guus...
TRANSCRIPT
1 May 14, 2014
Uncertainties in projections of ozone-depleting substances and alternatives
Guus Velders
The Netherlands
(RIVM)
2 Guus Velders
Focus on Ozone-Depleting Substances
● Projections of gases controlled by the Montreal Protocol– CFCs, halons, HCFCs, carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, CH3Br
● Projections for WMO assessments: – Made by 2D and 3D models– Policy options/scenarios often with box model
● Equivalent Effective Stratospheric Chlorine (EESC)
– Index for stratospheric chlorine and bromine and their ability to destroy ozone
– Uncertainties mostly not taken into account
● Uncertainties are important for these projections
3 Guus Velders
Comprehensive uncertainty analyses
● EESC calculation using baseline production of ODSs from WMO(2011)● Same box model as in WMO(2011) used
● Uncertainties applied to 1σ . – Lifetimes of all ODSs from SPARC (2013): 12-33%– Production (past from UNEP) and future: 5%– Banks from TEAP: 10%, 20%– Emission factors: 10%, 20%– Fractional release values: 10%, 20%– Alpha (efficiency of Br compared to Cl): 25%– Age-of-air (vertical transport): 0.3 yr– Observed mixing ratios (as constraint): 0.1 ppt– Surface factor: 3%
Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis
4 Guus Velders
Range in future mixing ratios
● Lifetimes and uncertainties from SPARC (2013)– Most likely and possible uncertainty ranges (1σ)– CFC-11: 52 yr 11% or 22%– CFC-12: 102 yr 8% or 15%– HCFC-22: 12 yr 16%– Halon-1211: 16 yr 33%– Halon-1301: 72 yr 9% or 13%
● Data before 2010 constrained by observations
● Mixing ratio range (95% conf.) 2050– ±35 ppt for CFC-11– ±48 ppt for CFC-12
5 Guus Velders
Range in future EESC levels
● Uncertainties applied to lifetimes (of all ODSs) only
● EESC (mixing ratios) before 2010 constraint by observations
● Range in EESC levels– Mean: 1200 ppt in 2050– Range 1050-1350 ppt
● EESC return to 1980 levels– Mid-latitudes: 2048
● Range 2040 to 2061
– Antarctic: 2075● Range 2062 to 2101
6 Guus Velders
ODSs contributing most to EESC uncertainty
● EESC return to pre-1980 levels● Largest contributions from CFC-11
and Halon-1211
● Correlations between uncertainties taken into account:
CFCs, CCl4, Halon-1301:
– Species mainly removed by photolysis in stratosphere
HCFCs, methyl chloroform, Halon-1211, CH3Cl, CH3Br:
– Species mainly removed by OH in troposphere
● Correlations increase total uncertainty
7 Guus Velders
Range in future EESC levels: all uncertainties
● Uncertainties applied to all parameters and all ODSs
● EESC return to 1980 levels– Mid-latitudes: 2048
● Range 2039 to 2064
– Antarctic: 2075● Range 2061 to 2105
● Ranges only slightly larger than with uncertainties in lifetimes only
● Lower range: equal to zero emissions scenario
● Upper range: 12 times total projected HCFC emissions (2014-2050)
8 Guus Velders
Parameters contributing most to EESC uncertainty
● Uncertainties applied to all parameters● Ranges in year of return to pre-1980
levels
● Largest contributions– Uncertainties in lifetimes
● Other contributions from– Age-of-air– Fractional release values– Bromine efficiency (alpha)
● Atmospheric burden much larger than current banks
– Factor of 4 for CFC-11– Factor of 30 for CFC-12
9 Guus Velders
Uncertainties in ODP-weighted emissions
● ODPs also have uncertainties– CFCs: 30-35%– HCFCs: 55-70%– Halons: 60-90%
● Large contributions again from uncertainties in lifetimes
● Peak emission– Mean: 1.3 MtCFC-11-eq/yr– Range 0.9 to 1.8 MtCFC-11-eq/yr
● Total uncertainties (95% conf.) of 20% to more than 40%
10 Guus Velders
Other factors also affect future ozone layer
● Non-Montreal Protocol related changes also important
● Increases in other gases: CO2, CH4, N2O:– Changes through chemical reactions: HOx, HCl, NOx, ClONO2
– Changes through temperature and dynamics of the atmosphere● Changes in emissions of very short lives species (VSLS)● Also potential effects from:
– Rockets– Aircraft– Volcanoes– Geoengineering– Biofuels– etc.
Picture NOAA/ESRL
Mt Pinatubo
11 Guus Velders
Uncertainties in GWP-weighted emissions and RF
● Uncertainties can also be translated to climate metrics: GWP and RF
● Additional uncertainties from radiative efficiency and CO2 forcing
● Uncertainties: 20-40% 10-30%
12 Guus Velders
Uncertainties in scenarios of ODS alternatives
● Alternatives used for ozone-depleting substances
– Hydrocarbons, CO2, NH3
– Alternative technologies: Mineral wool, etc.– HFCs with long lifetimes:
HFC-134a, HFC-125, HFC-143a, etc.
– HFCs with short lifetimes: HFC-1234yf, HFC-1234ze, etc.
● Uncertainties in HFCs lifetimes ~20%● Scenario uncertainty more important
● If current HFC mix (lifetime 15 yr) were replaced by HFCs with lifetimes less 1 month forcing in 2050 less than current HFC forcing
Velders et al. Science (2012)
13 Guus Velders
Changes in types of applications: CFCs vs HFCs
● CFCs (1980s) used in very emissive applications– Spray cans, chemical cleaning– Release within a year
● HFCs used mostly in slow release applications– Refrigeration, AC: release from 1 – 10 yr– Foams: release > 10 yr
Velders et al. (20124)
14 Guus Velders
Role of the banks increases for HFCs
● Banks: HFCs present in equipment: refrigerators, AC, foams, etc.
● Bank about 7 times annual emission
● Phaseout in 2020 instead of 2050– Avoided emission: 91-146 GtCO2-eq
– Avoided bank: 39- 64 GtCO2-eq
Banks: climate change commitment
● Choices:– Bank collection, destruction: difficult/costly– Avoid the buildup of the bank: early
phaseout
15 Guus Velders
● Uncertainties in lifetimes most important for EESC projections– Scenario uncertainty more important for ODS alternatives
● Growing importance of HFC banks for climate change
Work performed in close collaboration withJohn Daniel (NOAA, USA)
Thank you for your attention
References: - Velders and Daniel, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2014- Velders, Solomon and Danel, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2014
Conclusions