1q20 presentation 2019 (new)...bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was usd 31 mill, a...

25
Third quarter presentation 2020 November 5, 2020

Upload: others

Post on 02-Jan-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Third quarter presentation 2020

November 5, 2020

Page 2: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Agenda• Highlights

• Financials

• Operational review/Strategy

• Prospects and Market update

Page 3: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Highlights

“3Q20 was impacted by seasonality and a high number of drydockings. We aresatisfied with our ability to continue to report positive results in this challengingenvironment. We keep renewing contract rates at higher rates, which is anencouraging sign. We have taken further steps to consolidate the chemical tankermarket by establishing a new coated pool which will further strengthen ouroperational platform in a capital efficient way. We expect 4Q20 results to be in linewith 3Q20".

Kristian Mørch, CEO Odfjell SE

Key figures, USD mill

31. Proportional consolidation method

Another quarter with positive results despite a seasonally slower market, a high number of drydockings and an unclear macro environment

EBITDA of USD 72 mill, compared with USD 82 mill in 2Q20

EBITDA of USD 64 mill from Odfjell Tankers, compared to USD 74 mill 2Q20

EBITDA of USD 8 mill from Odfjell Terminals, same as 2Q20

Net result was USD 4 mill compared to USD 31 mill last quarter

Adjusted for non-recurring items, net results were USD 5 mill in 3Q20 compared to adjusted net results of USD 17 mill last quarter

COA rate renewals were up 4.5% in 3Q20 and continue the firming trend

COA coverage normalized at 50% in 3Q20, compared to 35% in 2Q20

We have set ambitious targets to reduce our carbon intensity by 50% by 2030 compared to 2008 levels and have a climate neutral fleet from 2050. Both targets go beyond targets set by IMO

Subsequent events

We have established a new pool for coated IMO2 chemical tankers, initially adding 6 vessels, and we are actively working on a further expansion of the pool

(USD mill, unaudited) 4Q19 1Q20 2Q20 3Q20 3Q19 FY19

Odfjell Tankers 215.6 240.2 234.6 229.7 214.2 871.3

Odfjell Terminals 18.0 17.5 16.0 16.3 16.4 69.8

Revenues* 235.3 259.3 252.4 247.7 232.7 949.5

Odfjell Tankers 50.1 57.9 73.9 63.6 44.7 184.4

Odfjell Terminals 7.8 8.1 7.6 7.8 6.0 26.7

EBITDA* 58.0 66.3 81.9 71.7 51.4 213.4

EBIT 11.7 24.3 49.7 27.1 25.9 59.0

Net result (10.0) (4.4) 30.9 3.9 (1.1) (36.6)

EPS** — (0.06) 0.39 0.05 (0.01) (0.47)

ROE*** (5.6 %) (0.5 %) 13.6 % 3.5 % (7.6 %) (6.4 %)

ROCE*** 2.8 % 5.1 % 8.2 % 5.4 % 2.7 % 2.8 %*Includes figures from Odfjell Gas** Based on 78.8 million outstanding shares*** Ratios are annualised

Page 4: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Agenda• Highlights

• Financials

• Operational review/Strategy

• Prospects and Market update

Page 5: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Key quarterly deviations:

Timecharter revenues reduced driven by lower spot rates compared to the previous quarter

Higher operating expenses and depreciation driven by newbuilding deliveries

Changes in net finance driven by reduced mark-to-market value of our financial derivative portfolio

Odfjell Terminals revenues improved slightly driven by a rebound in activity following reduced throughput in 2Q20

Odfjell Terminals net profit of USD 1.5 mill. Adjusted for depreciation of excess values net of deferred tax, net result was USD 3.2 mill

Adjusted for non-recurring items related to M-t-M valuation of derivatives, adjusted net result for the group was USD 5 mill compared to adjusted net result of USD 17 mill previous quarter

USD mill Tankers Terminals Total*

2Q20 3Q20 2Q20 3Q20 2Q20 3Q20

Gross revenues 234.6 229.7 16.0 16.3 1.8 1.7

Voyage expenses (76.9) (80.6) — — (77.8) (81.3)

Pool distribution (20.5) (21.1) — — (20.5) (21.1)

Net Timecharter Earnings (TCE) 137.2 128.0 16.0 16.3 154.1 145.3

TC expenses (9.2) (8.1) — — (9.2) (8.1)

Operating expenses** (40.4) (42.0) (6.2) (6.1) (47.1) (48.8)General and administrative expenses (13.8) (14.4) (2.2) (2.4) (15.9) (16.8)

EBITDA 73.9 63.6 7.6 7.8 81.9 71.7

Depreciation** (36.9) (38.6) (5.3) (5.4) (42.7) (44.5)

Impairment — — — — 0.1 —

Capital gain/loss 0.1 — 10.3 (0.1) 10.4 (0.1)

EBIT 37.1 25.0 12.5 2.2 49.7 27.1

Net interest expenses** (20.9) (19.9) (0.7) (0.6) (21.6) (20.7)

Other financial items 4.1 (1.3) — 0.1 4.1 (1.5)

Taxes (1.1) (1.1) (0.2) (0.3) (1.3) (1.4)

Net results 19.3 2.6 11.6 1.5 30.9 3.9

EPS 0.24 0.03 0.15 0.02 0.39 0.05

Voyage days 6,184 6,205 — — 6,184 6,205

Financials

51Proportional consolidation method *Total Includes contribution from Gas Carriers,** Includes right of use assets

Income statement1 – Odfjell Group by division

a

a

b

b

c

cd

d

e

e

f

f

Page 6: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Financials

61. Equity method

Cash position reduced following downpayment of USD 50 mill on our revolving credit facility. Available liquidity including revolver is USD 138 mill

Investments in associates and JVs includes our Equity value of Odfjell Terminals of USD 164 mill including cash of USD 47 mill and the remainder our ownership of Odfjell Gas

3Q20 equity ratio of 30% excluding debt related to right of use assets compared to 29% in 2Q20

Assets, USD mill 2Q20 3Q20

Ships and newbuilding contracts 1,459.4 1,483.5Right of use assets 276.2 261.4Investment in associates and JVs 171.8 174.4Other non-current assets/receivables 19.2 20.1Total non-current assets 1,926.6 1,939.5Cash and cash equivalent 148.4 92.4Other current assets 117.0 123.1Total current assets 265.4 215.4Total assets 2,192.0 2,154.9

Equity and liabilities, USD mill 2Q20 3Q20Total equity 549.6 560.1Non-current liabilities and derivatives 48.6 43.0Non-current interest bearing debt 972.8 1,006.7Non-current debt, right of use assets 234.2 222.3Total non-current liabilities 1,255.7 1,271.9Current portion of interest bearing debt 219.4 167.8Current debt, right of use assets 50.8 49.2Other current liabilities and derivatives 116.5 105.9Total current liabilities 386.7 322.9Total equity and liabilities 2,192.0 2,154.9

Balance sheet 30.09.20201 – Odfjell Group

Page 7: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Cash flow, USD mill 1Q20 2Q20 3Q20 FY19Net profit (4.5) 31.1 3.7 (35.9)Adjustments 41.9 32.9 38.2 147.5Change in working capital (1.5) 3.1 (10.1) (7.3)Other (4.2) (13.0) (1.7) (5.6)Cash flow from operating activities 31.7 54.1 30.1 98.7Sale of ships, property, plant and equipment 4.1 — — 2.0Investments in non-current assets (47.6) (54.4) (48.2) (146.8)Dividend/ other from investments in Associates and JV's — 1.4 — 20.7Other 2.3 1.6 (0.5) 0.8Cash flow from investing activities (41.2) (51.4) (48.7) (123.1)New interest bearing debt 71.1 61.4 127.9 369.9Repayment of interest bearing debt (27.4) (24.3) (101.7) (367.2)Payment of operational lease debt (12.1) (12.4) (13.5) (44.9)Dividends — — — —Repayment of drawing facilities — — (50.0) —Cash flow from financing activities 31.6 24.7 (37.3) (42.2)Net cash flow* 20.4 27.3 (55.9) (67.0)Opening cash and cash equivalents 100.8 121.1 148.4 167.8Closing cash and cash equivalents 121.1 148.4 92.4 100.8

USD 10 mill change in working capital weighing on operating cash flow, but this is expected to be reversed

Final instalment on fifth super-segregator newbuilding of USD 41 mill. Other capex amounts to USD 7 mill

Drawdown on debt for newbuilding of USD 41 mill and refinancing of vessels totalling USD 88 mill

Repaid USD 32 mill on debt facility for vessels that is now unencumbered, but will be refinanced in 4Q20. Regular amortisation amounted to USD 22 mill

Repaid USD 50 mill on our revolving credit facility

Total available cash of USD 138 mill including cash on balance and amount available under revolving credit facility

3Q20 quarterly free cash flow to equity of USD -12 mill mainly with short-term effects from working capital a main driver

* Equity method and after FX effects** Free Cash flow to equity: Excludes capex related to newbuildings and new interest bearing debt

Financials

7

17

-12

-20

0

2017

-12

-20

0

20

-5

1Q-20 2Q-20 3Q20

Quarterly Free Cash flow to equity (USD mill)

Cash flow – 30.09.20201 – Odfjell Group

a

b

c

d

a

b

d

c

e

e

f

f

Page 8: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

8

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

3Q19 1Q20

50.1USD

mill

2Q20

39.8

4Q19

40.1

33.631.1

3Q20

Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill

Bunker adjustment clauses hedged 50% of our total volumes during the quarter

We have hedged 25% of our uncovered bunker exposure for 2021 (about 12.5% total volumes) at an average price of USD 286 per tonne for VLSFO and USD 326 per tonne for MGO

Financials

Gross bunker cost 47.0 46.0 60.3 35.1 34.4Financial hedging (0.1) 0.1 - 1.4 0.6Adj. Clauses (1.7) (1.3) (4.9) 2.4 2.13rd party vessels (5.1) (4.7) (6.1) (5.3) (6.0)Net bunker cost 39.8 40.1 49.4 33.6 31.1

Bunker expenses – 30.09.2020 – Odfjell Tankers

493

267

334

417

234

305

1Q-20 2Q-20 3Q-20

Singapore Rotterdam

Average Platts 0.5% FOB Singapore & Rotterdam

Page 9: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Financials

9

16,000

18,000

20,000

22,000

24,000

2Q-181Q-18 3Q-193Q-18 4Q-18 1Q-19 3Q-202Q-19 4Q-19 1Q-20 2Q-20

Break-even (USD/Day) Long-term target rangeTCE (USD/Day)

Odfjell Tankers Break-even per day vs TCE per day (USD) Comments

Our break-even increased compared to 2Q20 mainly driven by increased amortisations related to newbuilding deliveries together with increased drydockings

TCE net of pool distribution was USD20,620 per day in 3Q20

Projected average break-even level is USD 21,400/day for 2021

We have a target to reach a break-even level between USD 18,000 and USD19,500 to ensure we can generate positive cash flow throughout market cycles

This target will be met by reducing our debt levels, optimising our debt portfolio and ensure amortisation profile match the economic lifetime of our vessels

We believe we can meet these break-even levels in 2022, but timing will be market dependent

Our TCE per day decreased during the quarter and our break-even levels increased due to increased amortisations and drydockings

Page 10: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

10

Scheduled repayments and planned refinancing, USD mill

Gross interest bearing debt ending balance, USD mill*

USD 50 mill liquidity facility is secured and will be used to redeem Jan-21 bond…

…We might consider to refinance the bond if the price is right for Odfjell

Except for the Jan-21 bond maturity, we do not have any maturing balloons before 2Q22

1 2561 081 933 791

-400-200

0200400600800

1 0001 2001 400

2020 2021 2022 2023

Repayment Planned vessel financing Ending balance year-end

0

50

100

150

200

1Q224Q20 1Q21 2Q21 4Q213Q21 2Q22 3Q22 4Q22 1Q23 2Q23

Bond Secured loansLeasing/sale-leasebackBalloon

Last newbuilding delivery and new debt concluded in October 2020

Scheduled amortisations through 2023 will bring us in the lower end of our target total debt range of USD 750 - USD 900 mill...

...Timing is however, contingent on the market development

Financials

Debt development – Corporate and chemical tankers

* Nominal bank, lease and bond debt. Bond debt swapped to USD

Page 11: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Financials

Assuming annualized 2020 results in the years to come – We will succeed on our de-leveraging strategy which will considerably strengthen our leverage profile

2.5x

3.0x

3.5x

2020 20222021

4.2x

2023

NIBD/EBITDA Debt target range

NIBD/EBITDA development based on annualized 2020 EBITDA and current debt repayment schedule Observations

With the latest newbuilding delivered in October, our deleveraging strategy will become more visible

Our current gross debt balance will be reduced by USD 465 mill by 2023 solely based on scheduled amortizations of USD 644 mill and an estimated new debt of USD221 mill refinanced

This would take us within our debt level targets and considerably strengthen our leverage profile

Our target is to reach a gross debt level between USD 750 mill and USD 900 mill.

This target would yield a NIBD/EBITDA of 2.4x -2.9x based on annualised 2020 EBITDA and our 3Q20 cash position

* NIBD includes all outstanding debt and reflects end-year balance as highlighted on page 9. Cash position is assumed in line with 3Q2011

Page 12: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Agenda• Highlights

• Financials

• Operational review/Strategy

• Prospects and Market update

Page 13: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

COA coverage Adaptable TC fleet Cargo flexibilityGlobal platform1 Ship Management

0

20

40

60

19’15’

50%56%

16’ 17’ 18’ 20’

58% 60%53%

43%

05

1015202530

4Q-19

4Q-17

4Q-18

TC-in vessels Pool vessels

13

Our activities may appear unaffected by the ongoing pandemic but in reality, this has been the ultimate test of the strength of our platform and our crew

1/3 of our crew is currently overdue and 126 has served 10 months or more

Maritime personnel has worked from home since March with poor internet connectivity, closed embassies for visa applications, unreasonable port states across the globe, severe lack of flights, community lockdowns by governments, heavily increased response time from relevant authorities, extensive quarantine arrangements, covid testing of crew before onboarding among others

Ships needed to be diverted to non-planned ports for crew changes impacting costs and customers. We have performed 13 dockings, however with severe challenges bringing in spare parts and service personnel to supervise dockings

Onboard repairs increasingly conducted by our experienced crew, with remote shore support. We benefit from a loyal crew pool with many being with us of Odfjell for more than 25 years

2 3 54

59

36

15

7 63

11 m10 m 12 m 13 m 14 m 15 m

Onboard crew reached 10 months and up

Key challenges under the pandemic from a ship management perspective:

Record low on accidents with no LTI’s since Aug-19

All-time high vetting performance

Our predictably KPI to customers remains strong despite the many challenges

Operational review/Strategy

Months

Key obstacles needed to be tackled: Despite these challenges, we are:

Page 14: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

61% 60% 59% 55% 55%

35%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

4Q192Q18 3Q18 2Q19 3Q194Q18 1Q19 1Q20 2Q20

50% 52% 51%

3Q20

50%

COA coverage Average

Operational review/Strategy

14

COA coverage

Spot fixtures

Future development

Renewals

Contract volumes normalised during the quarter

Mainly driven by a normalisation of cargo flow after an extraordinary 2Q

Our stance to not renew COA rates at unsustainable levels remains

Average COA rate renewals in 3Q20 was up 4.5% on average

We reduced our exposure to weakening CPP and Vegoil spot trades

Spot markets for chemicals weakened, but activity levels remains decent

We expect COA volumes to remain stable going forward

The vast majority of our COAs are up for renewal during 4Q20

3,1 3,3 3,3 3,1 3,2 3,0 2,93,2 3,2 3,1

0,40,5 0,5

0,5 0,50,4 0,4

0,5 0,6 0,7

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

4,5

4Q182Q18 2Q193Q18 3Q191Q19 4Q19 1Q20 2Q20

3,53,8 3,73,8

3,63,83,7

3,4 3,3

3Q20

3,8

Volumes carried by Pool tonnage Odfjell volumes

Odfjell Tankers

COA liftings(%)

Odfjell Tankers volume

development(Mill tonnes)

COA volumes normalized in 3Q20 – COA rates keeps being renewed at increased levels and our stance to not renew COAs at unsustainable levels remains

Page 15: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

13 modern pool vessels

We took delivery of one super-segregator newbuilding in August, and the delivery of the last newbuilding was concluded in end-October

We have no capital commitments for chemical tankers beyond 2020 and fleet renewals are limited to three 25,000 dwt stainless steel tankers as right of use assets

Other chemical tanker investments for 2021 is USD 6 mill mainly related to ballast water treatment systems and investments to improve the efficiency on our vessels

We expect the average annual docking capitalization to be about USD 15 million in the years ahead

15

Financials

We have completed the largest fleet renewal program in the history of Odfjell –We now have the most energy efficient fleet in the industry and zero capex outstanding for growth

Aug-19

Bow Orion Bow Olympus

Nov-19

Bow Explorer

Aug-20

Bow Odyssey Bow Optima Bow Excellence

Apr-20 Oct-20Jan-20

Bow PersistentBow Performer

Bow Platinum

Bow Prosper

Bow Precision Bow NeonBow Titanium Bow PalladiumBow Tungsten

Jun-20Feb-20

Oct-18

Jan-19

Jan-18 Jul-17Aug-17Mar-18May-18

Bow Gemini

Nov-18

Bow Aquarius

Dec-18

Bow Capricorn

Apr-18

Bow Hercules

Jan-18

+ 24 re-deliveries & sales-19 vessels delivered+

Page 16: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

16

20

16

12

8

4

00 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

MOL

Ultratank

SC ShippingHansa

Core deep sea fleet (Current operated fleet and order book), # of vessels

Average fleet age, Years

Ace

Zodiac

GSB Tankers

Fairfield

Bahri

MTMMIino

Navig8

WomarStolt-Nielsen

WilmarIMC/Aurora

Dorval

Stolt + 5 CTG

Odfjell

Size: Fleet size, DWT

Operated fleet and order book, rebased to December 20211

Source: Odfjell Fleet OverviewCore deep sea defined as: more than 15 tanks, average CBM/tank less than 3000, IMO 2 capacity and is considered a “core chemical operator”. Not accounting for scraping

Our fleet renewal program and our consolidation efforts have given us a leading position in our markets

We have established one chemical tanker MR pool

Navig8 Chemical Tankers will contribute with six chemical MR tankers and Odfjell will contribute with six of our coated MR vessels

By this, Odfjell contributes to further consolidate the chemical tanker market in a capital efficient way

The growing presence will improve our customer service, fleet flexibility and increase our presence in the commodity chemical market

The vessels joining our pools are young and efficient vessels that further reduces the average age of our fleet and improves our competitiveness

We are actively working on further expansion of the pool

CTG exited their investment in the chemical tanker market and vessels were acquired by Stolt-Nielsen

Operational review/Strategy

Page 17: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Stable results compared to previous quarter

The terminals are following local regulations and guidelines with respect to Covid-19, and all terminals are operating at normal capacity

Underlying demand for storage continues to be strong with average commercially occupancy of 99% for the quarter

Activity levels is rebounding with average total number of handlings up by 16% compared to 2Q20

We are putting back into service the refurbished tanks at Bay 17 on schedule in 4Q20

We are progressing towards FID on the Bay 13 expansion project in Houston that is planned to come on stream in 2022. This will include additional storage capacity for specialty chemicals, catering to truck, rail, ship and barge modalities

All near-term capex, including Bay 13, will be funded locally in the Odfjell Terminals US joint venture

Planned expansion capex for Odfjell Terminals is USD 48 mill of which the majority relates to our Houston terminal, where expansion of Bay-13 has been added to our plan. Planned maintenance capex amounts to USD 37 mill, but this also includes maintenance that will improve efficiencies and operations at our terminals.

Operational review/Strategy

17

Our US terminals continue to perform well, and we are progressing with our expansion plans

Tank Terminals capex (Odfjell share)*

Planned expansion capex 9 19 19

Odfjell Terminals Houston expansion plans

Page 18: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Operational review/Strategy

18

ESG – We are launching new and ambitious climate targets, which goes further than IMO targets on emissions

Sustainability-linked finance framework in place. The framework is based on planned emission cuts, in-line with the sustainability-linked bond and loan principles and is supported by a 2nd party opinion

1

2

3

4

Odfjell will cut greenhouse gas emission by 50% by 2030 compared to 2008*

* Emissions based on transport work and Annual Efficiency Ration (AER)

Odfjell is dedicated to pursuing a zero-emission strategy and will only order vessels with zero-emission technology from 2030

Odfjell will have a climate neutral fleet from 2050

Odfjell will actively support initiatives to develop technology and infrastructure for zero emissions and support international regulation to drive zero emission for our industry

Page 19: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Agenda• Highlights

• Financials

• Operational review/Strategy

• Prospects and Market update

Page 20: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Chemical tanker tonne-mile demand development

20

2015

6%

1H-202014

2%

8%

2018

6%

2016

1%

2017

4%

2%

2019

2%

3Q-20 (Jul-Aug)

Source: Odfjell SE

+4%p.a.

+7%p.a.

Chemical tanker demand has remained in positive territory through 2020 except for the month of March and May

The third quarter has reflected a recovery in demand in the Atlantic hemisphere and a slowdown in the eastern hemisphere

The trend has been less volumes trading over materially longer distances as a consequence of regional differences stimulating long-haul shipments

Prospects and market update

Demand growth remains positive and appears to have bottomed out in the second quarter

+1%p.a.

Page 21: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Source:Argus, ICIS, Odfjell*Seaborne imports includes a selection of products and domestic utilisation of these respective products21

Low-cost producers are gaining market share and seaborne traded volumes are expected to grow faster than end-user demand

0510152025303540455055606570758085

1.3

0.7

1.0

0.80.9

1.4

1.11.2

1.51.61.71.81.92.02.12.22.3

Sep-20

jun-18

jan-18

jan-19

jun-19

jan-20

Feedstock prices… …Ensured US Competitiveness restored …Chinese Imports replacing Domestic production Observations

Methanol

Eth.Glycol

Styrene

Seaborne importsAverage utilsation domestic capacity

Less US & AG export capacity coming online going forward. However, last years new capacity to gain market share from high cost domestic producers is estimated to support continued higher shipping demand relative to end-user demand both in a tonne and a tonne-mile perspective

Leading to superior producer margins...US still has the most competive feedstock... And lost market share for high cost producers...

-1000

100200300

May-20Jan-20 Sep-20

USA Europe NEA

-200

0

200

400

600

Jan-20 May-20 Sep-20

-400

-200

0

200

May-20Jan-20 Sep-200

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

550

600

10/2001/20 04/20 07/20

US Ethane US NaphthaAsia Naphtha

Page 22: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Comments

Swing tonnage players has reduced its exposure in the chemical/Vegoil market so far in 2020

We are experiencing increased competition from swing players in the Middle East especially

We therefore expect some increased swing tonnage into our markets, but not to the same extent as seen in 2018/19

19,6% 20,7%

0%20%40%60%80%

100%

aug-

18

feb-

17

mai

-18

aug-

17

jan-

17

jun-

17m

ai-1

7

mar

-17

apr-1

7

feb-

20

jun-

19

jul-1

8

sep-

17

nov-

19

okt-1

7no

v-17

des-

17

mai

-20

jan-

18fe

b-18

mar

-18

apr-1

8

jun-

18

aug-

19

sep-

18ok

t-18

nov-

18de

s-18

jan-

20De

c-19

jan-

19fe

b-19

mar

-19

apr-1

9m

ai-1

9

jul-1

9

sep-

19O

ct-1

9

mar

-20

apr-2

0

jul-1

7

jun-

20ju

l-20

aug-

20se

p-20

Trading chemicals/Vegoil Trading CPP/Crude

22

Swin

g to

nnag

eFl

oatin

g st

orag

e

Prospects and market update

Ord

er a

ctiv

ity

The CPP market is currently weak and adds risk for increased swing tonnage going forward

The vast majority of floating storage of CPP has been unwinded…

… A recovery in demand to improve utilisation of the product tanker fleet is key to avoid accelerated competition in chemicals/vegoils

1

2

3The orderbook to fleet ratio for chemical tankers

remains close to all-time low of 5.6%Orders were placed during the quarter, but many

of the vessels are replacement tonnageUncertainty surrounding new future propulsion

system and environmental regulations keeps reducing the orderbook…

Low supply growth the next years is encouraging

The supply side continues to look favorable for the next year, and with historically low orderbook it will continue to do so for the coming years

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

0

5

10

15

20

Dec-19 Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20

Shar

e of

flee

t

Mill

dw

t

Product tankers % share of fleet

0

200

400

600

800

Jan-

97Se

p-97

May

-98

Jan-

99Se

p-99

May

-00

Jan-

01Se

p-01

May

-02

Jan-

03Se

p-03

May

-04

Jan-

05Se

p-05

May

-06

Jan-

07Se

p-07

May

-08

Jan-

09Se

p-09

May

-10

Jan-

11Se

p-11

May

-12

Jan-

13Se

p-13

May

-14

Jan-

15Se

p-15

May

-16

Jan-

17Se

p-17

May

-18

Jan-

19Se

p-19

May

-20

Kdw

t

12M rolling new orders Historical average

Page 23: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Mar

ket d

river

s

23

GDP growth expected to be weak but to recover in 2H20 and to rebound in 2021 by 5.2% (IMF)GDP

Influx of swing tonnage re-emerging on selected routes, but is not expected to reach previous peaks. Vast majority of floating storage for CPP unwinded and dependend new demand

Swing tonnage

Very limited growth in supply with an orderbook of only 5.6% which means a likely quick recovery when demand normalize

Reduced fleet

growth

Demand has continued to grow despite Covid19, albeit at a lower rate. Recovery in auto and automotive is ongoingCovid-19

Prolonged global economic slowdown – More influx of swing tonnageRisk

factors

Prospects and market update

+3%p.a.

Dependent on outcome of covid-19 for the global economy

+1%p.a. +/- Swing tonnage

Future market developments are highly dependent on the restart of the global economy following the pandemic, but fundamentals continue to look very strong

Page 24: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

We expect 4Q20 results to be in line with 3Q20

Summary and Prospects

24

A quarter with positive results despite a seasonally slower market, a high number of drydockings and an unclear macro environment

We have contributed further in the ongoing consolidation of the chemical tanker market by establishing a new pool

We have announced ambitious ESG commitments and have prepared sustainability linked framework giving us access to attractive financing

We continue to operate well despite the challenging environment

3Q20 results

Consolidation

ESG targets

Covid-19

Prospects and market update

Outlook

Page 25: 1Q20 Presentation 2019 (NEW)...Bunker costs after bunker adjustment clauses was USD 31 mill, a decrease from the previous quarter with a cost of USD 34 mill Bunker adjustment clauses

Thank you

Odfjell SEInvestor Relations & Research: Bjørn Kristian Røed | Tel: +47 40 91 98 68 | E-mail: [email protected]

Conrad Mohrs veg 29 | P.O. Box 6101 Postterminalen | Tel: +47 55 27 00 00 | E-mail: [email protected]

Investor Relations: Bjørn Kristian Røed | Tel: +47 40 91 98 68 | Email: [email protected]: Anngun Dybsland | Tel: +47 41 54 88 54 | Email: [email protected]

ODFJELL SE | Conrad Mohrs veg 29 | P.O. Box 6101 Postterminalen | 5892 Bergen | NorwayTel: +47 55 27 00 00 | Email: [email protected] | CRN: 930 192 503

Contact