2-3 deductive reasoning. a mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your...

15
2-3 Deductive Reasoning

Upload: silas-wiggins

Post on 18-Jan-2018

225 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

2-3 Deductive Reasoning A doctor will use deductive reasoning to diagnose a patient.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

2-3 Deductive Reasoning

Page 2: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

2-3 Deductive Reasoning

A mechanic uses deductivereasoning to determine whatis wrong with your car.

Page 3: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

2-3 Deductive Reasoning

A doctor will use deductive reasoning to diagnose apatient.

Page 4: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

2-3 Deductive Reasoning

A lawyer uses deductive reasoningto build a case.

Page 5: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

2-3 Deductive Reasoning

A construction foreman usesdeductive reasoning to determinewhat materials are needed ata work site.

Page 6: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

2-3 Deductive Reasoning

And of course adetective uses deductive reasoning to solve crimes.

Page 7: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

Deductive Reasoning

The process of reasoning logically from a givenStatement to a conclusion. AKA logical reasoning.

Page 8: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

Deductive Reasoning

There are two laws used in logical reasoning:

LAW OF DETACHMENT

LAW OF SYLLOGISM

Page 9: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

Deductive ReasoningLAW OF DETACHMENT

This law states that if a conditional statement is true, andIts hypothesis is true, then its conclusion is true.

Example: If it is raining outside, then I will use my umbrella.

It is raining outsideWhat can you conclude?

I will use my umbrella.

If p q is a true statement and p is true,Then q is true.

Page 10: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

Deductive Reasoning

LAW OF DETACHMENT

More examples:

If Taylor and Nick make the softball teamThen they will get new hats.

Nick and Taylor made theSoftball team.

What can we conclude?

Taylor and Nick get a new hat.

Page 11: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

Deductive Reasoning

LAW OF SYLLOGISM

This law of deductive reasoning allows you to make aConclusion if the following are true:

The conclusion of one true conditional statement is theSame as the hypothesis of another true statement.

Page 12: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

Deductive Reasoning

LAW OF SYLLOGISM

If Tony goes to the movies, then he will eat popcorn.

If Tony eats popcorn, he will get indigestion.

Conclusion: If Tony goes to the movies, then he will getIndigestion.

If p q and q r are true statements, then p r is a true statement

Page 13: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car
Page 14: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

Deductive Reasoning

LAW OF SYLLOGISM

Example: If it rains outside, the walkway will get wet.

If the walkway is wet, the walkway will be slippery.

What can we conclude from the Law of Syllogism?

If it is raining, the walkway will be slippery.

Page 15: 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. A mechanic uses deductive reasoning to determine what is wrong with your car

Can you use Law of detachment?

If a person lives in Omaha, then, he or she lives in Nebraska.

Tamika lives in Omaha

Yes, we could use detachment to determine the conclusion

Tamika lives in Nebraska.