2-4 sun datacenter_efficiency session

8/8/2019 2-4 Sun Datacenter_efficiency Session

1/28

Improving DatacenterEfficiency

Nagaraj SRegional ManagerSystems BusinessSun Microsystems India Pvt Ltd

1


2/28


3/28

3

Agenda

Trends in Today's Market

Rethinking Processors

Rethinking Storage Rethinking Servers


4/28

4

The IT Dilemma

I want newservices quicklyBusiness Needs

Financial Needs

Operational Needs

I want to reduce

my power bill

I'm running out of space, powerand cooling capacity


5/28

5

Demand and Capacity are Colliding...

Demand Users

Services Access

Power Costs

Space Heat

2003 2005 NextGeneration

40 120

800Watts perSquare Foot

...and datacenters are right in the MIDDLE!

Datacenter


6/28

6

Rack Density Increasing

28x2U Servers2kW Heat Load

42x1U Servers6kW Heat Load

6 BladeCenters24kW Heat Load

6 BladeCenters30kW Heat Load

Source: Emerson Network Power/Liebert

2000 2002 2005 2008


7/287

Not Enough Cooling for High Loads

Source: Uptime Institute


8/288

Not Enough Space

Tier1-Tier3 ECO Datacentersat US & International Ports

Capacity: 4000 racks and over

350 Sun Modular Datacenters 75MW of power, free cooling

from ocean water

Six months time to market,

up to 40% less thantraditional build

At the end of a dockinstead of the end of a street


9/289

The Opportunity

Cut Energy

Costs in Half

Increase

UtilizationLevels to asHigh as 85%

Improve Space

Efficiencyby 2x


10/2810

Strategy: Addresses Energy Efficiency

Power savings can be addressed in many different ways

Cooling Efficiency

Power Efficiency/DistributionStorage Efficiency

Turn on CPU Power Management

Match Infrastructure to SLAs

Retire Unused Systems

Power Efficient Systems forNew Deployments

Technology Refresh

Optimize System Utilization:

Consolidation/ Virtualization/Workload Mgmt

More Efficient Applications

30%-50%

20%-40%20%-75%

5%-40%

20%-30%

50%-100%

40%-60%

50%-80%

50%-80%

50%-95%

5%-30%

5%-25%5%-20%

5%-15%

10%-15%

5%-10%

10%-30%

30%-50%

30%-60%

30%-70%

Point Projects Entire DC

Authority to

Change Top 10 Strategies Potential Independent Energy Savings

BUControl

IT/DCContro

l


11/2811

Strategy: Addresses Energy Efficiency

Power savings can be addressed in many different ways

Cooling Efficiency

Power Efficiency/DistributionStorage Efficiency

Turn on CPU Power Management

Match Infrastructure to SLAs

Retire Unused Systems

Power Efficient Systems forNew Deployments

Technology Refresh

Optimize System Utilization:

Consolidation/ Virtualization/Workload Mgmt

More Efficient Applications

30%-50%

20%-40%20%-75%

5%-40%

20%-30%

50%-100%

40%-60%

50%-80%

50%-80%

50%-95%

5%-30%

5%-25%5%-20%

5%-15%

10%-15%

5%-10%

10%-30%

30%-50%

30%-60%

30%-70%

Point Projects Entire DC

Authority

to Change Top 10 Strategies Potential Independent Energy Savings

BUControl

IT/DCContro

l


12/2812

Why Applications Dont PerformWaiting for DATA Memory can't keep up

RelativePerforman

ce

1990 1995 20051980 1985 2000

2x EverySix Years

2x EveryTwo Years

Gap

CPU Frequency

DRAM Speeds

10000

1000

100

10

1


13/2813

Single ThreadedPerformance

Single Threading

Thread

Memory Latency Compute

Time

HURRYUP ANDWAIT!

C C C

Typical ProcessorUtilization:1525%

M M M

Up to 85% Cycles Waiting for Memory


14/2814

Single ThreadedPerformance Chip Multi-threaded

(CMT) Performance

The Power of Chip Multi-ThreadingCoolThreads !!! UltraSPARC T1 & T2

Processor Utilization:Up to 85%

Thread 1

Memory Latency Compute

Time

Thread 2

Thread 3

Thread 4

C C CM M M

C C CM M M

C C CM M M

C C CM M M


15/2815

Lowest Wattage per Thread and Core

2nd Gen. Opteron Xeon 5300 POWER6 UltraSPARC T2

Threads per CPU 2 4 4 64

Watts per thread 60 30 33 1.5Cores per CPU 2 4 2 8

Watts per core 60 30 65 12

10 GbE* N/A N/A N/A Integrated

Crypto accelerator* N/A N/A N/A Integrated

PCI-Express* N/A N/A N/A IntegratedWattage 119 120 130 94

*Additional wattsrequired

22 22 22 0

Total wattage 141 142 152 94


16/2816

Innovation Never Stops


17/2817

Why Applications Dont PerformWaiting for DATA HDDs can't keep up

Todays Multi-Core,Multi-Socketapplication server design areincreasingly held back by slowstorage

When requesting data, the serverspends most of its time waitingfor storage

Application performance remainsluggish regardless of the Server

CPU horsepower The traditional remedy of adding

more expensive DRAM may nolonger suffice as data sets doubleevery 2 years


18/2818

CPU to Storage DiscontinuityThe number of HDDs needed to keep up


19/2819

New Server Memory/Storage Hierarchy


20/28

20

Enterprise SSD> 7,000 Write IOPS> 35,000 Read IOPS> 32GB> ~3W

$ per IOPS: 0.04

Enterprise HDD> 180 Write IOPS> 320 Read IOPS> 300 GB> ~18W

$ per IOPS: 2.43

Cost Effective PerformanceSSDs are 70X more cost effective


21/28

21

Hybrid Storage Pool EconomicsRight-Size Performance & Capacity

1/10ththeCost

1/5ththePower


22/28

22

ZFS Turbo Charges ApplicationsThe Hybrid Storage Pool Data Management

ZFS automatically :> Writes new data to a very fast SSD

pool (ZIL)

> Determines data access patternsand stores frequently accesseddata in the L2ARC

>Bundles IO into sequential lazywrites for more efficient use of lowcost mechanical disks


23/28

23

Systems & StorageProcessor & Desktop

Sun Innovation:Driving Efficiency at Every Level

Datacenter

VIRTUALIZATION


24/28

24

Policy-Based Data

ManagementHighly ScalableArchitecture

Tape-StackingFunctionality

DisasterRecovery Utility

What Can We Offer ?

Hard Partitions Virtual Machines OS Virtualization Virtual Tape Virtual Disk

Systems

OS

AppCalendarServer

WebServer

IdentityServer

AppServer

Database Back Up Archive DBBusiness

Apps

Mainframe / Open Systems Mainframe / Open Systems

Database

Multiple OSs Single OS

Trend to Flexibility Trend to Isolation

Scalable, low overhead

Single OS to manage

Divides system andapp administration

Fine grainedresource management

Ability to live migrate

Ability to run differentOS versions and types

De-couples OS and HWversions

Systems

AppMailServer

WebServer

FileServer Back Up Archive DB

BusinessApps

Multiple OSs Single OS

Universal Volume Manager

(UVM)Tiered Storage Manager

(TSM)

Virtual Partition Manager(VPM)

Dynamic Provisioning

Hard Partitions Virtual Machines OS Virtualization Virtual Tape Virtual Disk

Increases Utilization Levels Up to 85%

Very high RAS

Very scalable

Mature technology

Ability to run differentOS versions


25/28

25

Offerings from SunSun Servers

Sun SPARCEnterprise Servers

CoolThreads Servers x64/x86 Servers

Most powerful, robust, mission-critical virtualization servers

High performance per watt

Dynamic Domains

Solaris ContainersImprove security

Integrated, open sourcevirtualization Logical Domains

Solaris Containers

Record-breaking performance

Breakthrough energy and spaceefficiency

Save on CAPex and Opex

Available in racks/blades

Most powerful, scalable,virtualized designs

Efficient Chassis Designs

Choice of hypervisor and OS

allows for investment protectionWindowsLinuxSolaris Solaris ContainersxVM ServerVMware


26/28

26

Offerings from SunSun Storage

Primary Storage Tape LibrariesVirtual Tape

Consolidate management ofall heterogeneous storage

Greater utilization throughthin provisioning and virtualvolumes

Simplified configurationmanagement andtroubleshooting via CommonArray Manager (CAM)

Improved reliable backupcompletions via VTL

Greater efficiencies with tapeprocessing via VSM

Better tape utilization andmanagement ease

Lower TCO, higher ROI

Capacity on demand via tapethin provisioning

Easy creation of logical library,drives, and media for testing

Aids in compliance

Share tape library amongstmultiple backup applications andUNIX, Windows, AS/400,mainframe


27/28

SPARC and Solaris Systems#1 in Key Benchmarks

#1 in OLTP Database: TPC-C #1 in Java Applications : SPECjAppServer, SPECjbb2005 #1 in Web/Network: SPECweb #1 in Oracle BI EE #1 in Oracle Hyperion #1 in PeopleSoft Payroll #1 in Siebel CRM #1 in SAP ERP (using the Oracle Database)


28/28

Nagaraj [email protected]

2-4 sun datacenter_efficiency session

Documents