2) and v´eronique farra 1) ivan pˇsenˇc´ık
TRANSCRIPT
Approximate traveltimes of waves propagatingin laterally varying layered anisotropi media
Ivan Psencık1) and Veronique Farra2)
1) Institute of Geophysics, Acad. Sci. Praha, Czech Republic
2) Institut de Physique du Globe, Paris, France
14th IWSA, Perth 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
OutlineIntrodu tionFirst-order ommon S-wave ray tra ingApproximate S-wave traveltime formulaeTransformation of rst-order slowness ve torsat an interfa e (Snell's law)
OutlineIntrodu tionFirst-order ommon S-wave ray tra ingApproximate S-wave traveltime formulaeTransformation of rst-order slowness ve torsat an interfa e (Snell's law)Numeri al examples
OutlineIntrodu tionFirst-order ommon S-wave ray tra ingApproximate S-wave traveltime formulaeTransformation of rst-order slowness ve torsat an interfa e (Snell's law)Numeri al examplesCon lusions
Introdu tiontraveltimes important in migration and tomography
standard ”anisotropic” ray tracers for S waves
Introdu tiontraveltimes important in migration and tomography
standard ”anisotropic” ray tracers for S waves
- break down in weakly anisotropic media
and in vicinities of singularities
Introdu tiontraveltimes important in migration and tomography
standard ”anisotropic” ray tracers for S waves
- break down in weakly anisotropic media
and in vicinities of singularities
- do not work in isotropic media
Introdu tiontraveltimes important in migration and tomography
standard ”anisotropic” ray tracers for S waves
- break down in weakly anisotropic media
and in vicinities of singularities
- do not work in isotropic media
- generate number of multiple reflections,
which may exceed acceptable limit
Introdu tionSolution: use of common S-wave ray concept
(Bakker, 2002; Klimes, 2006; Farra & Psencık, 2008)
Introdu tionSolution: use of common S-wave ray concept
(Bakker, 2002; Klimes, 2006; Farra & Psencık, 2008)
- common ray - artificial trajectory approximating rays
of S1 and S2 waves
Introdu tionSolution: use of common S-wave ray concept
(Bakker, 2002; Klimes, 2006; Farra & Psencık, 2008)
- common ray - artificial trajectory approximating rays
of S1 and S2 waves
- traveltimes of S1 and S2 waves evaluated by quadratures
along the common ray
Introdu tionSolution: use of common S-wave ray concept
(Bakker, 2002; Klimes, 2006; Farra & Psencık, 2008)
- common ray - artificial trajectory approximating rays
of S1 and S2 waves
- traveltimes of S1 and S2 waves evaluated by quadratures
along the common ray
- at interfaces, slowness vectors of generated waves determined
by solving 4th-degree polynomial equation
First-order ommon S-wave ray tra ing
dxi/dτ = 12∂G[M]/∂pi , dpi/dτ = −1
2∂G[M]/∂xi
xi - coordinates of the first-order ray Ω
pi - components of the first-order slowness vector p
τ - first-order traveltime
G[M](x,p) - S-wave first-order mean eigenvalue
G[M](x,p) = 12[G
(1)S1(x,p) + G
(1)S2(x,p)]
G(1)SI (x,p) - S-wave first-order eigenvalues of Christoffel matrix Γ
Eikonal equation: G[M](x,p) = 1
Approximate S-wave traveltime formulae
τS1,S2(τ, τ0) = τ [M](τ, τ0) + ∆τ [M](τ, τ0) + ∆τS1,S2(τ, τ0)
τ [M](τ, τ0) - first-order traveltime between τ0 and τ on common ray
∆τ [M](τ, τ0) - ”averaging” correction of first-order traveltime
∆τ [M] = 14
∫ ττ0
(B213 + B2
23)/(B33 − 1)dτ
∆τS1,S2(τ, τ0) - ”separation” traveltime correction
∆τS1,S2 = ∓14
∫ ττ0
√
(M11 − M22)2 + 4M 212dτ
Approximate S-wave traveltime formulae
Bmn = Bmn(x,p) = Γik(x,p)e[m]i (x)e
[n]k (x)
Γik - elements of Christoffel matrix Γ
e[m] - triplet of orthonormal vectors
e[3] = c[M]p, e[1], e[2] arbitrarily in the plane ⊥ e[3]
c[M] - common S-wave phase velocity
MMN = MMN(x,p) = BMN − BM3BN3/(B33 − 1)
Transformation of rst-order slowness ve torsat an interfa e (Snell's law)
pGi = pi − (pkNk)Ni + ξGNi
p - first-order common S-wave slowness vector of incident wave
pG - first-order common S-wave slowness vector of generated wave
N - normal to the interface, ξG = pGk Nk
pGi − (pG
k Nk)Ni = pi − (pkNk)Ni - Snell’s law
Transformation of rst-order slowness ve torsat an interfa e (Snell's law)
pGi = pi − (pkNk)Ni + ξNi
G[M](x,pG) = 1 - eikonal equation
G[M](ξ) = 1 - polynomial equation of 4th degree for ξ
Iterative solution(Dehghan et al., 2007)
ξj = ξj−1 − [G[M](pj−1m ) − 1]/[Nk
∂G[M]
∂pk(pj−1
m )]
ξ0 - in reference isotropic medium
Numeri al examples (Klimes & Bulant, 2004)HTI rotated by 45 degrees0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 0 .
2 . 4
2 . 2
2 . 0
QI (ANI 3%, SEPAR 1-4%)
z = 0 k m
S1
S2
P h a s e a n g l e ( d e g )
Ph
as
e v
elo
cit
y (
km
/s)
0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 0 .
3 . 0
2 . 8
2 . 6
z = 1 k m
P h a s e a n g l e ( d e g )
Numeri al examples0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6
0
- 0 . 0 5
S 1 A N D S 2 W A V E S
Q IR
el
tt
d
if.
(
%)
D e p t h ( k m )0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6
Numeri al examples (Klimes & Bulant, 2004)HTI rotated by 45 degrees0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 0 .
2 . 4
2 . 2
2 . 0
QI4 (ANI 6%, SEPAR 11-13%)
z = 0 k m
S1
S2
P h a s e a n g l e ( d e g )
Ph
as
e v
elo
cit
y (
km
/s)
0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 0 .
3 . 0
2 . 8
2 . 6
z = 1 k m
P h a s e a n g l e ( d e g )
Numeri al examples0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6
0
- 0 . 4
- 0 . 8
S 1 A N D S 2 W A V E S
Q I 4R
el
tt
d
if.
(
%)
D e p t h ( k m )0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6
Numeri al examples (Shearer & Chapman, 1989)VTI: MODEL SC1 (ANI 11%, SEPAR 0-11%)
2.2
2.25
2.3
2.35
2.4
2.45
2.5
2.55
2.6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Pha
se v
eloc
ity (
km/s
)
Phase angle (deg)
SVSH
Numeri al examples0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 6
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
S C 1 - H O M . , E X A C T ,
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 6
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
Numeri al examples0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 6
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
S C 1 - H O M . , E X A C T , A P P R .
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 6
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 6
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 6
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
Numeri al examples0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
S C G 1 - I N H O M . , E X A C T ,
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
Numeri al examples0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
S C G 1 - I N H O M . , E X A C T , A P P R .
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 8 1 . 0
0 . 5
0 . 4
0 . 3
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
Numeri al examples (Shearer & Chapman, 1989)VTI: MODEL SC4 (ANI 30%, SEPAR 0-30%)
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Pha
se v
eloc
ity (
km/s
)
Phase angle (deg)
SVSH
Numeri al examples0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 8 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 0
1 . 2
1 . 0
0 . 8
0 . 6
0 . 4
SC4
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 8 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 0
1 . 2
1 . 0
0 . 8
0 . 6
0 . 4
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
Numeri al examples0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 8 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 0
1 . 2
1 . 0
0 . 8
0 . 6
0 . 4
SC4
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 8 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 0
1 . 2
1 . 0
0 . 8
0 . 6
0 . 4
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 8 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 0
1 . 2
1 . 0
0 . 8
0 . 6
0 . 4
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
0 . 0 0 . 4 0 . 8 1 . 2 1 . 6 2 . 0
1 . 2
1 . 0
0 . 8
0 . 6
0 . 4
D E P T H I N K M
TR
AV
EL
TIM
E I
N S
EC
Con lusions- appli able to S waves in inhomogeneous isotropi ,weakly anisotropi and moderately anisotropi media- in isotropi media exa t, in anisotropi media approximate- single ommon S-wave ray ne essary for omputation oftraveltimes of S1 and S2 waves- ommon S-wave ray tra ing stable, does not ollapse anywhere- omputer time savings in omputing traveltimesof re e ted/transmitted waves- performs better in inhomogeneous media; smoothes loopsin traveltime urves