2 homeostasis in arabidopsis thaliana · 2/26/2016 · 5 121 contains a hemerythrin domain (hhe)...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Two bHLH Transcription Factors, bHLH34 and bHLH104, Regulate Iron 1
Homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana 2
Xiaoli Li1,2, Huimin Zhang1,2, Qin Ai2,3, Gang Liang2*, Diqiu Yu2* 3 1School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 4
Hefei, Anhui 230027, China 5
2Key Laboratory of Tropical Plant Resources and Sustainable Use, 6
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China 7 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 8
9
*Corresponding author: 10
Dr. Gang Liang ( [email protected]) 11
Dr. Diqiu Yu ([email protected]) 12
13
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS 14
X.L., G.L, and D.Y. designed the study. X.L., H.Z., Q.A., and G.L. performed 15
research. X.L., H.Z., G.L., and D.Y. analyzed data. G.L. wrote the article. X.L., 16
G.L., H.Z., Q.A. and D.Y. revised the article. All authors read and approved 17
the final manuscript. 18
19
FUNDING 20
This work was supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of 21
CAS, Candidates of the Young and Middle Aged Academic Leaders of 22
Yunnan Province [2015HB095] and the program for Innovative Research 23
Team of Yunnan Province [ 2014HC017]. 24
25
Short title: 26
bHLH34 and bHLH104 Regulate Iron Homeostasis 27
One sentence summary 28
bHLH34 and bHLH10 positively regulate Fe homeostasis by directly 29
activating the transcription of Ib subgroup bHLH genes, bHLH38/39/100/101. 30
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on February 26, 2016, as DOI:10.1104/pp.15.01827
Copyright 2016 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
ABSTRACT 31
32
Regulation of iron (Fe) homeostasis is critical for plant survival. Although the 33
systems responsible for reduction, uptake and translocation of Fe have been 34
described, the molecular mechanism by which plants sense Fe status and 35
coordinate the expression of Fe deficiency responsive genes is largely 36
unknown. Here, we report that two basic helix-loop-helix-type transcription 37
factors, bHLH34 and bHLH104, positively regulate Fe homeostasis. 38
Loss-of-function of bHLH34 and bHLH104 causes the disruption of Fe 39
deficiency response and the reduction of Fe content, whereas their 40
overexpression plants constitutively promote the expression of Fe deficiency 41
responsive genes and Fe accumulation. Further analysis indicates that 42
bHLH34 and bHLH104 directly activate the transcription of Ib subgroup bHLH 43
genes, bHLH38/39/100/101. Moreover, overexpression of bHLH101 partially 44
rescues the Fe deficiency phenotypes of bhlh34bhlh104 double mutants. 45
Further investigation suggests that bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105 (ILR3) 46
function as homodimers or heterodimers to non-redundantly regulate Fe 47
homeostasis. This work reveals that plants have evolved complex molecular 48
mechanisms to regulate Fe deficiency response genes to adapt to Fe 49
deficiency conditions. 50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
INTRODUCTION 61
62
Iron (Fe) is of particular importance as a cofactor for a wide variety of proteins 63
in living organisms. In humans, Fe deficiency is one of the major reasons for 64
anemia. A plant diet is a major resource for human; thus it is important to 65
clarify the mechanisms of Fe homeostasis in plants. Fe is an indispensable 66
micronutrient for plant growth and development, and is involved in many 67
cellular functions, including chlorophyll biosynthesis, photosynthesis, and 68
respiration (Hänschand Mendel, 2009). Therefore, a decrease in Fe uptake 69
directly affects crop yield and crop quality. Plants take up Fe from the soil, 70
where Fe availability is limited as its major form is as insoluble ferric 71
hydroxides, especially in calcareous soils which make up one-third of the 72
world’s cultivated areas. 73
To cope with low Fe environments, higher plants have evolved two major 74
strategies for Fe acquisition. Non-graminaceous plants employ a reduction 75
strategy (strategy I), which involves three stages in low Fe conditions. The 76
acidification of soil by protons extruded by H+-ATPases and phenolic 77
compounds makes Fe(III) more soluble (Santi and Schmidt, 2009; Kobayashi 78
and Nishizawa, 2012). The ferric chelate reductase activity of FERRIC 79
REDUCTION OXIDASE 2 (FRO2) is induced by low Fe; this enzyme reduces 80
Fe(III) to Fe(II) (Robinson et al., 1999). The Fe(II) is then transported into 81
roots by the major Fe transporter of plant roots, IRON-REGULATED 82
TRANSPORTER 1 (IRT1) (Eide et al., 1996; Henriques et al., 2002; Varotto et 83
al., 2002; Vert et al., 2002). In contrast, graminaceous plants use a 84
chelation-based strategy (strategy II) (Walker and Connolly, 2008; Morrissey 85
and Guerinot, 2009). These plants release mugineic acid family 86
phytosiderophores, which have high affinity for Fe(III) and efficiently bind 87
Fe(III) in the rhizosphere. The resulting chelate complexes are then 88
transported into plant roots via a specific transport system (Mori, 1999). 89
Transcriptional regulation of genes involved in Fe uptake under Fe-deficient 90
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
conditions is intensively controlled by plants. In the past decade, several 91
bHLH proteins have been identified as regulators of Fe deficiency response. 92
The bHLH protein, tomato FER, was the first characterized to control Fe 93
deficiency responses, and its mutant failed to activate Fe acquisition strategy 94
I (Ling et al., 2002). FE-DEFICIENCY INDUCED TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 95
(FIT), a homolog of FER in Arabidopsis thaliana, is required for proper 96
regulation of ferric chelate reductase activity and Fe transport into the plant 97
root, and its mutation was lethal when plants were grown in normal soils 98
(Colangelo and Guerinot, 2004; Jakoby et al., 2004; Yuan et al, 2005). 99
However, overexpression of FIT is not sufficient to constitutively induce the 100
expression of its target genes, such as IRT1 and FRO2, in normal growth 101
conditions. In fact, FIT is dually regulated by Fe starvation. At the 102
transcriptional level, FIT is induced by Fe deficiency (Colangelo and Guerinot, 103
2004; Jakoby et al., 2004; Yuan et al., 2005). At the post-transcriptional level, 104
FIT is actively destabilized and degraded by the 26S proteasome during Fe 105
limitation (Meiser et al., 2011; Sivitz et al., 2011). In addition, FIT can form a 106
heterodimer with members of the Ib subgroup of bHLH proteins 107
(bHLH38/39/100/101) to constitutively activate the transcription of IRT1 and 108
FRO2 (Yuan et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2013). Both FIT and 109
bHLH38/39/100/101 function as positive regulators. In contrast, POPEYE 110
(PYE) was identified as playing a negative role in Fe deficiency response in 111
Arabidopsis thaliana (Long et al., 2010). PYE transcript levels were elevated 112
when plants were subjected to low Fe conditions. Chip-on-chip experiments 113
revealed that PYE directly targets several genes involved in metal 114
homeostasis, such as NICOTIANAMINE SYNTHASE 4 (NAS4), FRO3, and 115
ZINC INDUCED FACILITATOR 1 (ZIF1). In a pye-1 mutant, the expression of 116
these target genes is significantly upregulated in Fe-deficient conditions, 117
suggesting that PYE functions as a negative regulator. 118
It is unclear how plants perceive Fe status and transmit signals to 119
downstream pathways. In mammals, FBXL5 functions as an Fe sensor, and 120
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
contains a hemerythrin domain (HHE) for Fe binding and an F-box domain for 121
ubiquitination and degradation of IRP2. The latter governs cellular Fe 122
homeostasis by regulation of translation and stability of mRNAs involved in 123
Fe homeostasis (Salahudeen et al., 2009; Vashisht et al., 2009). Interestingly, 124
two different groups (Kobayashi et al., 2013; Selote et al., 2015) confirmed 125
that Arabidopsis thaliana BRUTUS (BTS) and its rice orthologs, 126
HAEMERYTHRIN MOTIF-CONTAINING REALLY INTERESTING NEW 127
GENE (RING) AND ZINC-FINGER PROTEIN 1 (HRZ1) and HRZ2, possess 128
HHE domains for binding Fe. Although they lack an F-box domain similar to 129
that in FBXL5, BTS and HRZ1/2 have RING domains that can mediate the 130
ubiquitination reaction. Functional analysis revealed that BTS and HRZ1/2 131
negatively regulate Fe deficiency response in plants. Given that BTS and 132
HRZ1/2 are structurally and functionally similar to FBXL5, they are thought to 133
be potential Fe sensors in plants. Although no substrates for HRZ1/2 have 134
been found, it is established that BTS interacts with three PYE-like proteins 135
(bHLH104, bHLH105/ILR3, and bHLH115) and facilitates 26S 136
proteasome-mediated degradation of bHLH105/IAA-LEUCINE RESISTANT3 137
(ILR3) and bHLH115 in the absence of Fe in vitro (Selote et al., 2015). 138
Recently, Zhang et al. (2015) revealed that bHLH104 and bHLH105 positively 139
regulate Fe homeostasis by directly activating transcription of 140
bHLH38/39/100/101 and PYE. Further investigation is required to explore the 141
functions of the other PYE-like proteins. 142
Here, through screening regulators upstream of bHLH101, we identified 143
bHLH transcription factor bHLH34, a homolog of bHLH104 in Arabidopsis 144
thaliana. Mutational analysis suggests that bHLH34 and bHLH104 positively 145
regulate Fe deficiency response. Further analysis reveals that both bHLH34 146
and bHLH104 directly activate the transcription of bHLH38/39/100/101. In 147
agreement with this, constitutive expression of bHLH101 partially 148
complements the Fe deficiency symptoms of bhlh34bhlh104 double mutants. 149
Protein interaction assays indicate that both heterodimers and homodimers 150
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
occur between bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105. These data reveal that 151
bHLH34 and bHLH104 play major roles in regulating Fe homeostasis by 152
activating the transcription of bHLH38/39/100/101 under Fe deficiency 153
conditions. 154
155
156
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
RESULTS 157
Identification of bHLH34 158
159
bHLH38/39/100/101 have been characterized as key transcription factors 160
regulating Fe-deficient response in Arabidopsis thaliana and their transcript 161
levels are also up-regulated by Fe deficiency. To identify transcription factors 162
functioning upstream of bHLH38/39/100/101, yeast one-hybrid (Y1H) 163
screening was performed using the promoter of bHLH101 as bait. From the 164
screening, we obtained nine positive colonies, three of which encoded a 165
bHLH protein, bHLH34. As a close homolog of bHLH34 (Supplemental Figure 166
1), bHLH104 has been characterized to bind the promoter of bHLH101 167
(Zhang et al., 2015). Further experiments confirmed that both bHLH34 and 168
both104, but not the other candidates, can activate the promoter of bHLH101 169
(Figure 1), which suggests that both bHLH34 and bHLH104 regulate 170
bHLH101 gene. Given that other Fe homeostasis-associated transcription 171
factors, such as bHLH38/39/100/101, FIT, PYE, MYB10/72, are induced by 172
Fe deficiency, we wanted to know whether bHLH34 and bHLH104 are also 173
responsive to Fe deficiency. Transcript abundance analysis indicated that 174
neither bHLH34 nor bHLH104 is affected by Fe deficiency (Supplemental 175
Figure 2). 176
177
bhlh34, bhlh104, and bhlh34bhlh104 Mutant Plants Display Fe 178
Deficiency Symptoms 179
180
To investigate the functions of bHLH34 and bHLH104, two T-DNA insertion 181
alleles for the bHLH34 and bHLH104 genes were obtained from The 182
Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR). bhlh34 contains a T-DNA in the 183
second exon and bhlh104 has a T-DNA insertion in the third intron (Figure 2A). 184
The homozygous lines of bhlh34 and bhlh104 were isolated by PCR, and the 185
positions of the insertions were confirmed. The loss of full-length transcripts in 186
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
the T-DNA lines were determined by RT-PCR (Figure 2B), indicating that both 187
T-DNA lines are knockout mutants. Considering their putative function 188
redundancy, we constructed bhlh34bhlh104 double mutants by crossing two 189
single knock-out mutants. When grown on Fe sufficient media, neither single 190
mutants nor double mutants showed any obvious phenotypic differences 191
compared with wild-type plants (Supplemental Figure 3). However, when they 192
were grown on Fe free media, all mutants displayed Fe-deficient symptoms 193
and the double mutants had the most severe phenotypes (Figure 2C ). 194
To further confirm the functions of bHLH34 and bHLH104, we designed an 195
artificial miRNA, amiR-bhlh34/104, which is predicted to target both bHLH34 196
and bHLH104 (Supplemental Figure 4A), and generated amiR-bhlh34/104 197
transgenic plants. qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated that both bHLH34 and 198
bHLH104 were significantly down-regulated in amiR-bhlh34/104 plants 199
(Supplemental Figure 4B). As expected, the amiR-bhlh34/104 transgenic 200
plants grown in soils showed interveinal chlorosis in leaves, which is very 201
similar to that of bhlh34bhlh104 double mutants (Figure 2D). Further 202
phenotype evaluation revealed that the root growth of amiR-bhlh34/104 203
seedlings was strongly inhibited on Fe-deficient media whereas no visible 204
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
difference was observed between amiR-bhlh34/104 and wild type plants on 205
normal media (Supplemental Figure 4C, D). These results demonstrate that 206
the amiR-bhlh34/104 plants phenocopy the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants. 207
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
208
Impaired Fe Deficiency Response by Loss-of-function of bHLH34 and 209
bHLH104 210
211
We further determined the Fe-associated phenotypes of plants grown in soils 212
containing various concentration of calcium oxide (Figure 3A), which was 213
used to produce alkaline soil in which the Fe availability was limited because 214
of decreased Fe solubility. In normal soil, no visible phenotypic difference was 215
observed between the bhlh34, bhlh104, and wild-type plants, whereas the 216
bhlh34bhlh104 double mutants had small stature and chlorotic leaves. In soil 217
supplemented with 1‰ (w/w) calcium oxide, the bhlh104 mutants showed 218
slight chlorosis. In contrast, 5‰ calcium oxide caused leaf chlorosis in all 219
three types of mutants, and seedling lethality of the bhlh34bhlh104 double 220
mutants. These data suggest that the loss-of-function of bHLH34 and 221
bHLH104 inhibits the Fe deficiency response of the bhlh34bhlh104 plants. 222
Fe is indispensable for the synthesis of chlorophyll, and Fe deficiency often 223
causes leaf chlorosis with decreased levels of chlorophyll in plants (Terry et 224
al., 1980). The significant chlorosis of the bhlh34bhlh104 double mutant 225
plants implied a decline in chlorophyll content. We measured chlorophyll 226
levels in plants grown on Fe-sufficient and -deficient media. There were no 227
significant differences under Fe-sufficient conditions. However, under 228
Fe-deficient conditions, the mutants showed significantly reduced chlorophyll 229
levels and the bhlh34bhlh104 double mutants had the lowest chlorophyll 230
levels (Supplemental Figure 5). 231
Fe reductase activity is a typical indicator of Fe deficiency. We analyzed Fe 232
reductase activity using the ferrozine assay (Yi and Guerinot, 1996). In 233
Fe-sufficient conditions, no significant difference in Fe reductase activity was 234
observed between wild-type and mutant plants. In response to Fe deficiency, 235
both wild-type and mutant plants increased their Fe reductase activity. 236
However, the Fe reductase activity of the mutant plants was significantly 237
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
lower than that of wild type, and the bhlh34bhlh104 double mutants had the 238
lowest Fe reductase activity (Figure 3B). 239
To determine whether the loss-of-function of bHLH34 and bHLH104 causes 240
altered Fe accumulation, the Fe content of wild-type and mutant 2-week-old 241
seedlings was measured. 11-day-old seedlings grown under Fe-sufficient 242
conditions were transferred to Fe-sufficient or Fe-deficient media for another 243
three days. Roots and shoots were separately harvested and used for Fe 244
content analysis. The shoots of bhlh34bhlh104 plants had 17% less Fe than 245
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
the shoots of wild-type plants under Fe sufficient conditions and 71% less Fe 246
under Fe deficient conditions (Figure 3C). Similar results were also observed 247
in the roots. The roots of bhlh34bhlh104 plants contained 10% less Fe than 248
the roots of wild-type plants under Fe sufficient conditions and 56% less Fe 249
under Fe deficient conditions (Figure 3D). These data suggest that bHLH34 250
and bHLH104 are required for maintaining Fe homeostasis in both 251
Fe-sufficient and -deficient conditions. 252
253
Fe Deficiency Responsive Genes are Down-Regulated in the bhlh34, 254
bhlh104, and bhlh34bhlh104 Mutants 255
256
To adapt to Fe-deficient conditions, plants often elevate the expression of 257
Fe-uptake associated genes. Fe deficiency-induced genes FRO2 and IRT1 258
encode two key root membrane proteins for Fe homeostasis; the former 259
converts Fe(III) to Fe (II) and the latter transports ferrous Fe from soil to root 260
(Robinson et al., 1999; Vert et al., 2002). Given the low Fe levels in the 261
bhlh34bhlh104 mutants, we wanted to know whether the expression of these 262
two Fe-uptake associated genes is altered in the mutants. In response to Fe 263
deficiency, both genes were induced in the roots of wild-type and mutant 264
plants. However, their expression levels were low in the mutants compared 265
with wild type under both Fe-sufficient and -deficient conditions (Figure 4). 266
Moreover, their expression levels in the bhlh34bhlh104 under Fe-deficient 267
conditions were close to that in the wild type in Fe-sufficient conditions. These 268
alterations suggest that there is decreased Fe uptake in the mutant plants, 269
which is in agreement with the reduction in both Fe reductase activity and Fe 270
accumulation. These data also demonstrate that bHLH34 and bHLH104 271
directly or indirectly activate the expression of FRO2 and IRT1. 272
Two MYB transcription factors, MYB10 and MYB72, were identified as Fe 273
deficiency responsive genes, which are responsible for the activation of 274
expression of the NAS4 gene in Fe-deficient conditions in Arabidopsis 275
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
thaliana (Palmer et al., 2013). Considering the fact that the bhlh34bhlh104 276
mutants display interveinal chlorosis similar to nas4x-1 mutants (Klatte et al., 277
2009), we asked whether these two MYB genes are affected in the 278
bhlh34bhlh104 mutants. As expected, compared with wild type, the mutants 279
show considerably down-regulated transcript abundance of MYB10 and 280
MYB72 regardless of whether Fe is deficient or not (Figure 4), suggesting that 281
bHLH34 and bHLH104 positively regulate the transcription of MYB10 and 282
MYB72. 283
The well-known transcription factors for Fe homeostasis in Arabidopsis 284
thaliana are four Ib subgroup bHLH transcription factors (bHLH38/39/100/101) 285
and another bHLH transcription factor, FIT, all of which are induced by Fe 286
deficiency (Colangelo and Guerinot, 2004; Wang et al., 2007). Each of 287
bHLH38/39/100/101 can interact with FIT to regulate the expression of Fe 288
uptake-associated genes (Yuan et al, 2008; Wang et al., 2013). To determine 289
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
the position of bHLH34 and bHLH104 in Fe signaling pathways, it is 290
necessary to investigate their regulatory relationship with these bHLH 291
transcription factors. Gene expression analysis revealed that 292
bHLH38/39/100/101 were strongly down-regulated in the bhlh34bhlh104 293
mutants under both Fe-sufficient and -deficient conditions, whereas FIT was 294
moderately decreased (Figure 4). These data imply that bHLH34 and 295
bHLH104 act upstream of bHLH38/39/100/101 and FIT. 296
In addition, we also determined the expression of genes that are involved in 297
Fe distribution in plants, finding that NAS2, NAS4, ZIF1, FRD3, OPT3 and 298
PYE were down-regulated in the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants in response to Fe 299
deficiency (Supplemental Figure 6). Taken together, our data suggest that 300
bHLH34 and bHLH104 positively regulate Fe deficiency response. 301
302
Overexpression of bHLH34 and bHLH104 Activates Fe Deficiency 303
Response 304
305
Considering the inhibited Fe deficiency response caused by loss-of-function 306
of bHLH34 and bHLH104, we asked whether elevated expression of bHLH34 307
and bHLH104 would enhance the Fe deficiency response. First, we 308
performed complementation assays. ProbHLH34:Myc-bHLH34 and 309
ProbHLH104:Myc-bHLH104 constructs were introduced into the bhlh34 and 310
bhlh104 mutants, respectively. When grown on Fe deficiency media, both 311
ProbHLH34:Myc-bHLH34/bhlh34 and ProbHLH104:Myc-bHLH104/bhlh104 plants 312
were comparable with wild type plants (Supplemental Figure 7), suggesting 313
the both mutants were rescued. Next, we constructed transgenic plants 314
expressing Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34 and Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104. When grown in 315
normal soils, about 10% of Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34 and 33% of 316
Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104 T0 transgenic plants displayed visible phenotypes 317
(small rosettes and leaf necrosis) (Figure 5A) and no visible phenotype was 318
observed for the other transgenic plants. We further assessed the root 319
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
phenotypes of T1 plants when grown on Fe deficiency media, finding that the 320
progenies of T0 plants with visible phenotypes produced short roots whereas 321
the root length of the other progenies was similar to that of wild type plants 322
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
(Figure 5B). In contrast, no visible phenotypes were observed between wild 323
type and transgenic plants when grown on Fe sufficient media for ten days 324
(Supplemental Figure 8A). The determination of transgene abundance 325
revealed that the transgenic plants with visible phenotypes have significantly 326
higher transgene levels than those without visible phenotypes (Figure 5C; 327
Supplemental Figure 8B) suggesting that the visible phenotypes are closely 328
associated with the transgene levels. For the further investigation, 329
Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34#3 and Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104#5 were chosen as 330
representatives of plants with visible phenotypes and Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34#7 331
and Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104#9 as representatives of plants without visible 332
phenotypes. 333
Given that the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants contain less Fe than wild type, we 334
asked whether overexpression transgenic plants accumulate more Fe than 335
wild type. The leaves of four-week-old plants grown in normal soil were used 336
for Fe concentration determination. As expected, overexpression plants have 337
higher Fe content than wild type, and the Fe concentration is particularly high 338
in Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34#3 and Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104#5 plants (Figure 5D). In 339
contrast, the concentration of Mn, Cu and Zn in overexpression plants is 340
comparable to that in wild type (Supplemental Figure 9). These data imply 341
that the visible phenotypes may be linked with the high transgene abundance 342
and high Fe concentration. 343
Correspondingly, we examined the transcript abundance of Fe deficiency 344
responsive genes. In contrast to the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants, overexpression 345
plants constitutively activate FIT, bHLH38/39/100/101, MYB10/72, IRT1, and 346
FRO2 (Figure 6), as well as NAS2, NAS4, ZIF1, FRD3, OPT3 and PYE 347
(Supplemental figure 10). These data suggest that bHLH34 and bHLH104 348
positively regulate Fe deficiency response. 349
350
bHLH34 and bHLH104 Directly Regulate Transcription of 351
bHLH38/39/100/101 352
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
353
Although bHLH38/39/100/101 and FIT are the major regulators of Fe 354
homeostasis, their transcripts are still up-regulated in response to Fe 355
deficiency. This implies that unidentified transcription factors activate their 356
transcription in Fe-deficient conditions. Our yeast one-hybrid assays indicated 357
that bHLH34 and bHLH104 can bind to the promoter of bHLH101. 358
Considering the fact that the transcript abundance of bHLH38/39/100/101 359
and FIT is decreased in the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants, we proposed that 360
bHLH38/39/100/101 and FIT are the direct target genes of bHLH34 and 361
bHLH104. To confirm this hypothesis, we designed a reporter-effector 362
transient expression assay system (Figure 7A; Supplemental figure 11A). The 363
promoter of bHLH101 was fused with the GFP reporter gene containing a 364
nuclear localization sequence (NLS) for construction of the reporter 365
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
expression cassette, ProbHLH101:NLS-GFP. For the construction of effectors, 366
bHLH34 and bHLH104 were fused with the CaMV 35S promoter to form 367
Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34 and Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104. When the 368
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
ProbHLH101:NLS-GFP reporter was separately co-expressed with the empty 369
vector (the backbone vector of Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34 and 370
Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104), only a weak GFP signal was observed (Figure 7B). In 371
contrast, the Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34 or Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104 effectors 372
dramatically enhanced the GFP signal of the ProbHLH101:NLS-GFP reporter. To 373
confirm the activation specificity, we also constructed a Pro35S:Myc-MYC2 374
effector. MYC2 is a bHLH transcription factor with transcription activation 375
activity (Fernández-Calvo et al., 2011). Co-expression assays indicated that 376
use of the Pro35S:Myc-MYC2 resulted in as low a GFP signal as was observed 377
for the empty vector (Figure 7B). We further quantified the GFP transcript 378
levels, which showed that the GFP mRNA abundance was considerably 379
increased when Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34 or Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104 effectors were 380
co-expressed with ProbHLH101:NLS-GFP (Figure 7C). Correspondingly, we 381
also constructed ProbHLH38:NLS-GFP, ProbHLH39:NLS-GFP, 382
ProbHLH100:NLS-GFP, and ProFIT:NLS-GFP reporters, finding that 383
Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34 and Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104 activated ProbHLH38:NLS-GFP, 384
ProbHLH39:NLS-GFP, and ProbHLH100:NLS-GFP, but not ProFIT:NLS-GFP 385
(Supplemental figure 11B). These data suggest that both bHLH34 and 386
bHLH104 specifically activate the transcription of bHLH38/39/100/101. 387
388
Overexpression of bHLH101 Partially Rescues bhlh34bhlh104 Mutants 389
Previous studies have confirmed that the FRO2 and IRT1 genes are 390
regulated directly by bHLH38/39/100/101and their expression is drastically 391
decreased in a bHLH39, bHLH100, and bHLH101 triple knockout mutant 392
(Yuan et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2013). Thus, we speculated that the inability 393
of bhlh34bhlh104 to induce bHLH38/39/100/101 is the primary reason for the 394
Fe deficiency symptoms and the reduced expression of FRO2 and IRT1 in 395
the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants. It was expected that elevated expression of 396
bHLH38/39/100/101 would cure or relieve the Fe deficiency symptoms. 397
Because of the functional redundancy of bHLH38/39/100/101 (Wang et al., 398
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
20
2013), we selected bHLH101 as a representative. We employed the CaMV 399
35S promoter to drive the expression of bHLH101. The Pro35S:bHLH101 400
cascade was introduced into the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants by Agrobacterium. 401
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
21
Of the 78 transgenic plants screened, 42 showed significant relief of the leaf 402
chlorosis symptom. Transcript level analysis indicated that bHLH101 was 403
constitutively overexpressed in the bhlh34bhlh104/Pro35S:bHLH101 plants 404
(Supplemental figure 12A). The T2 generation plants from two different 405
transgenic lines, bhlh34bhlh104/Pro35S:bHLH101#1 and 406
bhlh34bhlh104/Pro35S:bHLH101#11, were used for further analyses. When 407
grown for 10 days on Fe-deficient media, these two lines displayed significant 408
growth advantages compared with the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants (Figure 8A), 409
including increased root length and chlorophyll content (Figure 8B,C). We 410
further assessed the expression of IRT1, FRO2, MYB10 and MYB72, finding 411
that IRT1 and FRO2, but not FIT, MYB10 or MYB72, were elevated in the two 412
transgenic lines exposed to Fe-deficient conditions compared with the 413
bhlh34bhlh104 mutants (Figure 8D; Supplemental figure 12B-D). These data 414
reveal that the overexpression of bHLH101 partially rescues the 415
bhlh34bhlh104 mutants. 416
417
bHLH34 Can Physically Interacts with bHLH104 418
419
bHLH34 and bHLH104 belong to the IVc bHLH subgroup (Heim et al., 2003). 420
A typical feature of bHLH proteins is the formation of homodimers or 421
heterodimers. To investigate the potential interaction between bHLH34 and 422
bHLH104, we conducted yeast-two-hybrid assays (Figure 9A). When 423
full-length bHLH34 was fused with the BD domain of GAL4 in vector pGBK-T7, 424
it showed strong autoactivation activity. In contrast, the C-terminal truncated 425
versions containing the bHLH domain (bHLH34C) displayed no autoactivation 426
activity; this form was used in the subsequent yeast-two-hybrid assays. 427
Protein interaction test in yeast indicated that bHLH34C can interact with 428
bHLH104. 429
Next, we employed bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) 430
assays to confirm their interaction in plant cells. bHLH34 and bHLH104 were 431
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
22
fused with the N-terminal fragment (nYFP) and C-terminal fragment (cYFP) of 432
YFP, respectively. When bHLH34-nYFP was transiently co-expressed with 433
bHLH104-cYFP, strong YFP fluorescence was visible in the nucleus of 434
epidermal cells in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves whereas no YFP 435
fluorescence was detected in negative controls (bHLH34-nYFP co-expressed 436
with cYFP, or nYFP co-expressed with bHLH104-cYFP) (Figure 9B). 437
To further confirm whether bHLH34 and bHLH104 form a protein complex 438
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
23
in plant cells, we performed co-immunoprecipitation assays (Figure9C). 439
bHLH34 and bHLH104 were transiently co-expressed in tobacco leaves. The 440
total proteins were incubated with Flag antibody and A/G-agarose beads and 441
then separated on SDS-PAGE for immunoblotting with Myc antibody. In 442
agreement with the results from BiFC, bHLH34 and bHLH104 were present in 443
the same protein complex. Taken together, these data suggest that bHLH34 444
could physically interact with bHLH104. 445
446
Interaction between bHLH34/ bHLH104 and bHLH105 447
448
This work confirms the interaction between bHLH34 and bHLH104. Recent 449
study suggested that bHLH104 interacts with bHLH105 and modulates Fe 450
homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana (Zhang et al., 2015). Considering that 451
these three proteins share the same target genes (bHLH38/39/100/101), and 452
their overexpressors up-regulate the same Fe-deficiency responsive genes, 453
we proposed that they function as heterodimers. To investigate our 454
hypothesis, yeast-two-hybrid assays were performed. As shown in Figure 455
10A, each of these three proteins can interact with itself and the other two 456
proteins, implying that they function as homodimers or heterodimers. 457
To further investigate their genetic interactions, we further produced two 458
double mutants, bhlh34bhlh105 and bhlh104bhlh105. We tried to generate 459
bhlh34bhlh104bhlh105 triple mutants but failed. Then, we evaluated the 460
Fe-deficiency tolerance ability of various mutants. We found that under Fe 461
deficiency conditions both bhlh34bhlh105 and bhlh104bhlhl105 double 462
mutants displayed the enhanced Fe-deficiency symptoms (shorter roots) 463
compared with the three single mutants (Figure 10B). The expression of 464
Fe-deficiency responsive genes was lower in the bhlh34bhlh105 and 465
bhlh104bhlhl105 double mutants than in the three single mutants 466
(Supplemental figure 13). All these data suggest that bHLH34, bHLH104 and 467
bHLH105 play non-redundant but additive roles in modulating Fe 468
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
24
homeostasis. 469
Given their similar molecular functions, we wanted to know whether the 470
expression patterns of these three genes are different. We constructed 471
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
25
ProbHLH34:GUS, ProbHLH104:GUS and ProbHLH105:GUS transgenic plants. 472
Although different expression strength was observed, bHLH34, bHLH104 and 473
bHLH105 have similar tissue-specific expression patterns in rosette leaves, 474
cauline leaves, stems and siliques, but not in flowers(Supplemental figure 475
14A). When seedlings were further analyzed by microscope, all plants 476
contained GUS staining in the pericycle of root maturation zone and veins of 477
leaves (Figure 11). ProbHLH105:GUS was detected in the elongation zone of 478
root tips and early lateral roots whereas ProbHLH34:GUS and ProbHLH104:GUS 479
were not observed. In contrast, ProbHLH34:GUS and ProbHLH104:GUS were 480
detected in the hypocotyls whereas ProbHLH105:GUS was not. The difference 481
of tissue-specific expression patterns may explain the functional 482
non-redundancy between bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105. In addition, 483
GUS staining of seedlings exposed to Fe-sufficient and Fe-deficient 484
conditions suggests that their promoter activity is stable irrespective of the Fe 485
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
26
status (Supplemental figure 14B). 486
487
DISSCUSSION 488
489
Fe is indispensable for plant growth and development. Fe deficiency often 490
causes delayed growth and reduced photosynthesis, and hence decreased 491
crop yields. When suffering from a Fe-deficient environment, plants can 492
sense external Fe status and employ transcription factors and intricate 493
mechanisms to regulate the expression of Fe-uptake-associated genes, 494
which then facilitate Fe influx from soils to meet the internal demands of the 495
plant. However, excess Fe is toxic to plant cells owing to the generation of 496
hydroxyl radicals by the Fenton reaction (Thomine and Vert, 2013). Therefore, 497
it is crucial to maintain Fe homeostasis in plants. Plants have evolved 498
sophisticated regulatory mechanisms to maintain Fe homeostasis. It is well 499
known that bHLH38/39/100/101 and FIT have synergistic effects on the 500
regulation of Fe deficiency responses. Their co-overexpression constitutively 501
activates Fe acquisition strategy I in Arabidopsis thaliana. It is noteworthy that, 502
like other Fe deficiency responsive genes, bHLH38/39/100/101 and FIT are 503
induced by Fe deficiency. Thus, to reveal how bHLH38/39/100/101 and FIT 504
are activated in Fe-deficient conditions would provide insights into the 505
mechanism that plants employ to maintain Fe homeostasis. Here, we 506
characterized that both bHLH34 and bHLH104 activate the transcription of 507
bHLH38/39/100/101 and they non-redundantly regulate Fe deficiency 508
responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. 509
bHLH34 was identified by screening proteins that bound to the promoter of 510
the bHLH101 gene. The bhlh34, bhlh104, and bhlh34bhlh104 mutants display 511
sensitivity to Fe deficiency, including reduced root length, chlorotic leaves, 512
and decreased ferric-chelate reductase activity (Figure 2C; Figure 3 B). 513
Correspondingly, amiR-bhlh34/104 plants show phenotypes similar to those 514
of bhlh34bhlh104 mutants (Figure 2D; Supplemental Figure 3D). These data 515
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
27
indicate that loss-of-function of bHLH34 and bHLH104 causes sensitivity to 516
Fe deficiency. Fe deficiency sensitivity can be caused by limited Fe uptake or 517
disrupted Fe distribution. For example, irt1, frd1, and fit mutants display 518
severe Fe deficiency sensitivity because of Fe uptake limitation (Robinson et 519
al., 1999; Vert et al., 2002; Colangelo and Guerinot, 2004). In contrast, frd3 520
and opt3 mutation enhances Fe deficiency sensitivity by disrupting Fe 521
translocation (Durrett et al., 2007; Zhai et al., 2014). The determination of Fe 522
concentration confirms that the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants contain less Fe than 523
wild-type plants in both Fe-sufficient and -deficient conditions (Figure 3C, D), 524
suggesting that limited Fe uptake contributes to the Fe deficiency sensitivity 525
of the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants. We also observed that new leaves of 526
bhlh34bhlh104 mutants are yellower than old leaves (Figure 2D), whereas 527
the opposite phenomenon occurs in the bHLH34 and bHLH104 528
overexpression plants (Figure 5A), implying that bHLH34 and bHLH104 may 529
interrupt Fe distribution between leaves. 530
Fe deficiency responsive genes, including IRT1 and FRO2, MYB10/72, FIT 531
and bHLH38/39/100/101, are repressed in the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants 532
(Figure 4), indicating that the loss-of-function of bHLH34 and bHLH104 533
impairs the transduction of Fe deficiency response signaling. Although bhlh34 534
and bhlh104 mutants display reduced activation of Fe deficiency responsive 535
genes, the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants have the strongest inhibitory effect on the 536
Fe deficiency responsive genes. When either ProbHLH34:Myc-bHLH34 or 537
ProbHLH104:Myc-bHLH104 was introduced into bhlh34bhlh104 double mutants, 538
the Fe-deficiency symptoms of bhlh34bhlh104 were partially rescued 539
(Supplemental figure 15). These data suggest that bHLH34 and bHLH104 540
have non-redundant functions under Fe-deficient conditions. In contrary to 541
bhlh34 and bhlh104 mutants, bHLH34 and bHLH104 overexpression plants 542
activate the expression of Fe deficiency responsive genes (Figure 6). In 543
agreement with this, Fe is over accumulated in the overexpression plants 544
(Figure 5D). Taken together, our data suggest that bHLH34 and bHLH104 act 545
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
28
as positive regulators in Fe-deficiency response signaling. 546
The bhlh34bhlh104 mutants displayed enhanced Fe-deficiency sensitivity. 547
However, unexpectedly, we found that about 10% of Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34 and 548
30% of Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104 plants showed the short roots on Fe-deficient 549
media although they accumulated high Fe content and activated Fe 550
deficiency responsive genes including bHLH38/39/100/101, MYB10/72, 551
FRO2, IRT1 and so on. In fact, similar observations were made for a pye-1 552
mutant which up-regulates Fe deficiency responsive genes and accumulates 553
excessive Fe, but displays short roots under Fe deficiency conditions (Long et 554
al., 2010). NAS4 and ZIF1 are significantly up-regulated in the bHLH34 and 555
bHLH104 overexpression plants and particular high when overexpression 556
plants were subjected to Fe deficiency conditions (Supplemental figure 10). It 557
is noteworthy that NAS4 and ZIF1 are directly negatively regulated by PYE 558
(Long et al., 2010). As a negative regulator in Fe homeostasis, PYE is also a 559
direct target of bHLH104 and bHLH105 (Zhang et al., 2015). Our results 560
suggest that PYE is positively regulated by bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105. 561
The expression analysis of NAS4 and ZIF1 between bhlh34bhlhl104 and 562
pye-1 mutants (Supplemental Figure 16) indicates that NAS4 and ZIF1 are 563
positively and negatively regulated by bHLH34/bHLH104 and PYE, 564
respectively. Plants have evolved this mechanism to fine-tune the Fe 565
homeostasis. 566
Recently, Zhang et al. (2015) revealed that overexpression of bHLH104 567
and bHLH105 activates the Fe deficiency responsive genes and 568
overaccumulation of Fe. However, the Fe deficiency sensitivity of our 569
overexpression plants is completely different from the results from Zhang et al. 570
(2015), who confirmed that bHLH104 overexpression plants produced longer 571
roots than wild type on Fe deficient media. They used Pro35S:bHLH104-GFP 572
as an overexpression construct whereas we used Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104. To 573
investigate whether the C-terminal fused GFP affects the function of bHLH34 574
or bHLH104, we constructed Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34-GFP and 575
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
29
Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104-GFP transgenic plants. No visible phenotype was found 576
in all Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34-GFP and Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104-GFP transgenic 577
plants compared with wild type when plants were grown in normal soils. In 578
agreement with the results from Zhang et al., about 70% of these GFP fusion 579
transgenic plants produced significantly longer roots than wild type on Fe 580
deficient media (Supplemental Figure 17A). The expression of Fe-deficiency 581
responsive genes in GFP fusion transgenic plants with longer roots is 582
significantly lower than that in Myc fusion transgenic plants with shorter roots, 583
but comparable with the Myc fusion transgenic plants with normal roots 584
(Supplemental Figure 17B). It is noteworthy that the overexpression plants 585
with visible phenotypes have extremely high transgene levels compared with 586
overexpressors with invisible phenotypes (Figure 5C; Supplemental Figure 587
8B). Therefore, it is likely that the extremely high expression of transgene 588
caused abnormal regulation of Fe-uptake-associated genes and Fe overload. 589
In any case, it is an efficient approach to generate Fe deficiency tolerant 590
plants by constitutively expressing bHLH34 or bHLH104 with a C-terminal 591
fused with a GFP gene. 592
Under both Fe-sufficient and -deficient conditions, the transcript levels of 593
bHLH38/39/100/101 are always lower in the bhlh34, bhlh104, and 594
bhlh34bhlh104 mutants than in wild-type plants (Figure 4). Transient 595
expression assays reveal that both bHLH34 and bHLH104 activate the 596
promoters of bHLH38/39/100/101 (Figure 7B, C; Supplemental figure 11). 597
These data suggest that bHLH34 and bHLH104 directly and positively 598
regulate the transcription of bHLH38/39/100/101. In agreement with our 599
results, Zhang et al. (2015) showed the direct regulation of 600
bHLH38/39/100/101 by bHLH104. bHLH38/39/100/101 are strongly induced 601
when wild-type plants are exposed to Fe-deficient conditions. However, it is 602
worth noting that, in some mutants where Fe homeostasis is disrupted, such 603
as irt1, frd1, frd3, and fit, bHLH38/39/100/101 transcript abundance is 604
increased even under Fe-sufficient conditions compared with wild-type plants 605
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
30
(Wang et al., 2007). The fact that Fe deficiency responsive genes are 606
regulated by internal Fe demand via shoot-to-root signaling was previously 607
demonstrated (Grusak and Pezehgi, 1996; Vert et al., 2003). Interestingly, 608
although the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants have lower Fe content than wild-type 609
plants, the induction of bHLH38/39/100/101 by Fe deficiency is strongly 610
inhibited in the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants, suggesting that the transcriptional 611
activation of bHLH38/39/100/101 by internal Fe demand is largely dependent 612
on bHLH34 and bHLH104. 613
It has been confirmed that bHLH38/39/100/101 have redundant functions in 614
Fe deficiency response (Yuan et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2013). Our 615
experiments indicate that constitutive expression of bHLH101 partially 616
rescued the severe Fe deficiency symptoms of bhlh34bhlh104 mutants 617
(Figure 8), implying that regulation of bHLH38/39/100/101 by bHLH34 and 618
bHLH104 is required for Fe homeostasis. Because of the imperfect 619
complementation by overexpression of bHLH101, it is possible that the 620
ectopic expression of bHLH101 caused ectopic expression of its target genes, 621
which then led to the abnormal Fe distribution, or that bHLH34 and bHLH104 622
also regulate other genes that are involved in Fe homeostasis but are not 623
regulated by bHLH101. In fact, we found that the induction of FIT, MYB10, 624
and MYB72 by Fe deficiency is not rescued in 625
bhlh34bhlh104/Pro35S:bHLH101#1 and bhlh34bhlh104/Pro35S:bHLH101#11 626
plants (Supplemental figure 12). It has been reported that MYB10 and MYB72 627
are required for growth in Fe-limiting conditions by directly regulating the 628
expression of NAS4 (Palmer et al., 2013). NAS genes are responsible for the 629
synthesis of nicotianamine, which plays a role in intercellular and intracellular 630
distribution of Fe (Takahashi et al., 2003; Klatte et al., 2009). Therefore, the 631
elevated expression of bHLH101 may only rescue the Fe uptake phenotype, 632
but not the Fe distribution phenotype, in the bhlh34bhlh104 mutants. The 633
transcript abundance of bHLH34 and bHLH104 is not induced by Fe 634
deficiency (Supplemental Figure 2), which implies that they may be regulated 635
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
31
at the post-transcription level because their target genes are up-regulated by 636
Fe deficiency. To further analyze their protein stability and screen their 637
interaction partners will provide insights into their regulation mechanisms 638
under Fe deficiency conditions. The stronger Fe-deficiency symptoms of 639
double mutants than single mutants suggest that bHLH34, bHLH104 and 640
bHLH105 play non-redundant roles in regulating Fe homeostasis. We also 641
observed differential expression patterns among ProbHLH34:GUS, 642
ProbHLH104:GUS and ProbHLH105:GUS, which might explain the non-redundant 643
roles. 644
A putative Fe deficiency responsive signaling pathway was shown in Figure 645
12. BTS is considered a potential Fe sensor because its structure, its ability to 646
bind Fe, and its capacity to catalyze ubiquitination are similar to the 647
mammalian Fe sensor FBXL5 (Kobayashi et al., 2013; Selote et al., 2015). 648
BTS is induced and its product is stabilized by Fe deficiency; however, it has 649
been confirmed to negatively regulate Fe homeostasis (Long et al, 2010; 650
Selote et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). Long et al. (2010) confirmed that 651
bHLH104 and bHLH105, but not bHLH34, interacts with BTS in yeast. 652
Although its interaction with BTS, bHLH104 protein is not affected by BTS 653
(Selote et al., 2015). bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105 function as 654
homodimers or heterodimers. It is likely that the interaction of BTS with 655
bHLH104 competitively interferes with the formation of dimers, which then 656
affects regulation of downstream genes, such as bHLH38/39/100/101 and 657
PYE. FIT interacts with bHLH38/39/100/101 to activate the expression of 658
IRT1 and FRO2. PYE functions as the negative regulator of ZIF1 and NAS4. 659
MYB10 and MYB72 function redundantly to regulate Fe homeostasis by the 660
direct activation of NAS4. The induction of MYB10/72 by Fe deficiency is 661
partially dependent of FIT; and bHLH34/104/105 are required for the 662
induction of FIT and MYB10/72. It is worth mentioning that the model has no 663
spatial dimension; it reflects interactions globally but is not applicable in any 664
particular cell type because the expression patterns of the different players do 665
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
32
not always overlap. Future research should aim at identifying the distinct 666
modules that are active in the root cortex and epidermis, in the root stele and 667
in various leaf cell types. 668
669
670
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
33
METHODS 671
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions 672
The Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 was used as the wild type in 673
this study. The T-DNA insertion lines for bHLH34 (CS411089), bHLH104 674
(Salk_099496C) and bHLH105 (Salk_043690C) were confirmed using PCR 675
with a T-DNA primer and gene-specific primers (Supplemental Table 1). pye-1 676
was described previously (Long et al., 2010). Plants were grown in long 677
photoperiods (16 hour light/8 hour dark) or in short photoperiods (8 hour 678
light/16 hour dark) at 22°C. Surface sterilized seeds were stratified at 4°C for 679
2 to 4 d before being planted on media. Fe-sufficient (+Fe) media is half 680
Murashige and Skoog (MS) media with 1%sucrose, 0.8% agar, and 0.1 mM 681
FeEDTA. Fe deficient (–Fe) media is the same without FeEDTA. 682
683
Plasmid Construction 684
Standard molecular biology techniques were used for the cloning procedures. 685
Genomic DNA from genomic was used as the template for amplification of the 686
upstream regulatory promoter sequence for ProbHLH34:GUS, ProbHLH104:GUS , 687
ProbHLH105:GUS, ProFIT:NLS-GFP, ProbHLH38:NLS-GFP, ProbHLH39:NLS-GFP, 688
ProbHLH100:NLS-GFP and ProbHLH101:NLS-GFP. The NLS sequence was 689
amplified from the pGADT7 plasmid. For Pro35S:Flag-bHLH34, 690
Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34, Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104, Pro35S:bHLH101, 691
Pro35S:Myc-GUS and Pro35S:Myc-MYC2, the corresponding cds sequences 692
were inserted between the CaMV35S promoter and polyA of the binary vector 693
pOCA30. The amiR-bhlh34/104 was integrated into the MIR319a backbone 694
and the construction strategy was described previously (Liang et al., 2012). 695
Primers used for these constructs were listed in Supplemental Table 1. 696
Arabidopsis thaliana transformation was conducted by the floral dip method 697
(Clough and Bent, 1998). Transgenic plants were selected with the use of 50 698
μg/mL kanamycin. 699
700
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
34
Histochemical GUS staining 701
The whole seedlings were immersed immediately in 1.5 ml staining solution 702
containing 0.5 mg/mL 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-b-D-glucuronide (X-gluc, 703
Sigma) in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) in a microfuge tube. The 704
reaction was performed in the dark at 37°C until a blue indigo color appeared. 705
After the reaction, seedlings were rinsed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer 706
(pH 7.3). The samples were then rinsed twice in 70% ethanol to remove 707
chlorophylls. 708
709
Fe Concentration Measurement 710
To determine Fe content, 11-day-old seedlings grown on +Fe media were 711
transferred to +Fe or –Fe media for 3 days. The shoots and roots were 712
separately harvested and used for Fe measurement. Leaves of 4-week-old 713
plants grown in normal soils were used for measurement of Fe content. About 714
100mg dry weight for roots or shoots was used as one sample and three 715
samples were used in each independent experiment. Fe content analysis was 716
performed using inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy. 717
718
Ferric Chelate Reductase Assays 719
Ferric chelate reductase assays were performed as previously described (Yi 720
and Guerinot, 1996). Briefly, ten intact plants for each genotype were 721
pretreated for 30 min in plastic vessels with 4 mL half-strength MS solution 722
without micronutrients (pH 5.5) and then soaked into 4 mL Fe(III) reduction 723
assay solution [half-strength MS without micronutrients, 0.1 mM Fe(III)-EDTA, 724
and 0.3 mM ferrozine, pH adjusted to 5.0 with KOH] for 30 min in darkness. 725
An identical assay solution containing no plants was used as a blank. The 726
purple-colored Fe(II)-ferrozine complex was quantified at 562nm . 727
728
Chlorophyll Measurement 729
Chlorophyll content was measured in 2-week-old plants grown on 730
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
35
Fe-sufficiency and Fe deficiency media. All leaves are collected and ground 731
to powder in liquid nitrogen. The powder was resuspended in 80% acetone 732
on ice and centrifuged at 10,000g at 4°C, for 5 min. Chlorophyll 733
concentrations were calculated from spectroscopy absorbance 734
measurements at 663.2, 646.8, and 470 nm (Lichtenthaler, 1987). 735
736
Gene Expression Analysis 737
One micrograms total RNA extracted using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) was 738
used for oligo(dT)18 primed cDNA synthesis according to the reverse 739
transcription protocol (Fermentas). The resulting cDNA was subjected to 740
relative quantitative PCR using a SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM kit (TaKaRa) on a 741
Roche LightCycler 480 real-time PCR machine, according to the 742
manufacturer’s instructions. ACTIN2 (ACT2) was amplified as an internal 743
control, and gene copy number was normalized to that of ACT2. For the 744
quantification of each gene, at least three biological repeats were used. Each 745
biological repeat contained three technical replicates. One representative 746
result from one biological repeat was shown. The statistic significance 747
analysis was performed by student’s t test. The qRT-PCR primers were listed 748
in Supplemental Table 1. 749
750
Yeast Assays 751
For Y1H assay, the Matchmaker Gold Yeast One-Hybrid Library Screening 752
System (Clontech) was used. The pAbAi vector harboring 1000bp sequence 753
upstream bHLH101 gene was integrated into the genome of yeast strain 754
Y1HGold followed by selection on synthetic dextrose media agar plates 755
without uracil (SD/-Ura). We screened an Arabidopsis thaliana equalized 756
full-length cDNA library on synthetic dextrose media without Leu 757
supplemented with 100 ng/mL Aureobasidin A (AbA) (SD/-Leu/AbA). The AbA 758
resistance is activated by prey proteins that specifically interact with the bait 759
sequence. Candidate cDNA-harboring vectors were amplified and isolated 760
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
36
via Escherichia coli. The sequence of each candidate was analyzed with the 761
help of the TAIR database. 762
For Y2H assay, the C-terminal truncated bHLH34C and bHLH104C 763
containing the bHLH domain and full-length bHLH105 cDNAs were cloned 764
into pGBKT7, and the full-length cDNAs of bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105 765
were cloned into pGADT7. Growth was determined as described in the Yeast 766
Two-Hybrid System User Manual (Clontech). Primers used for the vector 767
construction were listed in Supplemental Table 1. Experiments were repeated 768
three times. 769
770
Transient Expression Assays 771
Plasmids were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105. 772
Agrobacterial cells were infiltrated into leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana by 773
the infiltration buffer (0.2 mM acetosyringone, 10 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM MES, 774
PH5.6). For BiFC assay, equal volumes of an Agrobacterium culture were 775
mixed before infiltration into N. benthamiana leaves. After infiltration, YFP and 776
DAPI fluorescence were observed under a confocal laser scanning 777
microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). For transcription activation assay, the 778
final OD600 value was, 0.1 (an internal control; Pro35S:Myc-GUS), 0.5 779
(reporter) and 0.5 (effector). After infiltration, plants were placed in dark at 780
24°C for 48 h before RNA extraction. The transcript abundance of GFP was 781
normalized to GUS. 782
783
CoIP Assay 784
Flag-bHLH34 and Myc-bHLH104 (or Myc-GUS) were transiently 785
co-expressed in N. benthamiana leaves. Infected leaves were harvested 48 h 786
after infiltration and used for protein extraction. Flag-fused bHLH34 was 787
immunoprecipitated using Flag antibody and the coimmunoprecipitated 788
proteins were then detected using Myc antibody. 789
790
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
37
Accession Numbers 791
Sequence data from this article can be found in the Arabidopsis Genome 792
Initiative or GenBank/EMBL databases under the following accession 793
numbers: bHLH34 (At3g23210), bHLH104 (At4g14410), bHLH105 794
(At5g54680), bHLH38(At3g56970), bHLH39 (At3g56980), bHLH100 795
(At2g41240), bHLH101(At5g04150), FIT (At2g28160), MYB10 (At3g12820), 796
MYB72 (At1g56160), FRO2 (At1g01580), IRT1 (At4g19690), NAS2 797
(At5g56080), NAS4 (At1g56430), ZIF1 (At5g13740), FRD3 (At3g08040), 798
OPT3 (At5g59040) , PYE (At3g47640) and ACT2 (At3g18780). 799
800
Supplemental Data 801
Supplemental Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of bHLH proteins involved in Fe 802
homeostasis. 803
Supplemental Figure 2. Expression of bHLH34 and bHLH104 in response to 804
Fe deficiency. 805
Supplemental Figure 3. Growth status of wild-type and mutant plants. 806
Supplemental Figure 4. Analysis of amiR-bhlh34/104 and double mutant 807
plants. 808
Supplemental Figure 5.Chlorophyll content of mutant seedlings on +Fe or –809
Fe media. 810
Supplemental Figure 6. NAS2, NAS4, ZIF1, FRD3, OPT3 and PYE 811
transcript levels in various mutant plants. 812
Supplemental Figure 7. Complementation of bhlh34 and bhlh104 mutants. 813
Supplemental Figure 8. Analysis of bHLH34 and bHLH104 overexpression 814
plants. 815
Supplemental Figure 9. Concentration of other metals in overexpression 816
plants. 817
Supplemental figure 10. NAS2, NAS4, ZIF1, FRD3, OPT3 and PYE 818
transcript levels in overexpression plants. 819
Supplemental figure 11. bHLH34 and bHLH104 activate the promoter of 820
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
38
bHLH38/39/100. 821
Supplemental figure 12. Analysis of bhlh34bhlh104/Pro35S:bHLH101 Plants. 822
Supplemental figure 13. Expression of Fe-deficient responsive genes in 823
various single and double mutants. 824
Supplemental figure 14. GUS staining of ProbHLH34:GUS, ProbHLH104:GUS 825
and ProbHLH105:GUS plants. 826
Supplemental figure 15. Partially complementation of bhlh34blhlh104 827
double mutants by ProbHLH34:Myc-bHLH34 and ProbHLH104:Myc-bHLH104. 828
Supplemental figure 16. Expression of NAS4 and ZIF1 in bhlh34blhlh104 829
and pye-1 mutants. 830
Supplemental Figure 17. Phenotypes of Pro35S:Myc-bHLH34-GFP and 831
Pro35S:Myc-bHLH104-GFP plants. 832
Supplemental Table 1. Primers used in this paper. 833
834
Figure Legends 835
Figure 1. Identification of bHLH34 and bHLH104 by yeast-one-hybrid assay. 836
The promoter of bHLH101 was used as bait and bHLH34/104 as prey. 837
Representative growth status of yeast cell was shown on SD/-Leu agar media 838
with or without AbA from triplicate independent trails. 839
840
Figure 2. Characterization of various mutant plants. 841
(A) T-DNA insertion position in the corresponding gene. Closed boxes 842
indicate the coding sequence. Open boxes indicate untranslated regions. 843
Triangles indicate the position of T-DNA. 844
(B) The corresponding full-length cDNAs were amplified by RT-PCR to 845
confirm the mutants. 846
(C) 10-day-old seedlings germinated directly on -Fe media. 847
(D) Phenotypes of amiR-bhlh34/104 and bhlh34bhlh104 plants in soils. 848
4-week-old plants grown in the normal soil were shown. 849
850
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
39
Figure 3. Fe deficiency response of various mutants. 851
(A) 3-week-old plants germinated in the soil with various concentration of 852
calcium oxide. 853
(B) Iron reductase activity of plants germinated and grown on +Fe media for 854
10 days and then shifted to –Fe media for 3 days. The ferrozine assay was 855
performed, in triplicate, on 10 pooled plant roots. Significant differences from 856
the wild type are indicated by *(P < 0.05). 857
(C) and (D) Fe content of shoots and roots. Seedlings were germinated and 858
grown on +Fe media for 11 days and then shifted to +Fe or –Fe media for 3 859
days. Significant differences from the wild type are indicated by *(P < 0.05). 860
861
Figure 4. Expression of Fe deficiency responsive genes in various mutants. 862
Wild-type and mutant plants were grown on +Fe media for 10 days, then 863
transferred to +Fe or –Fe media for 3 days. RNA was prepared from root 864
tissues. The data represent means (±SD) of three technical repeats from one 865
representative experiment. Significant differences from the corresponding 866
wild type are indicated by * (P < 0.05). 867
868
Figure 5. Phenotypes of bHLH34 and bHLH104 overexpression plants. 869
(A) 4-week-old plants grown in the normal soil. 870
(B) 10-day-old seedlings grown on –Fe media. The number indicates the 871
frequency of transgenic plants with the corresponding phenotypes. 872
(C) Relative transcript levels of bHLH34 (left) and bHLH104 (right) in 873
overexpression plants. Significant differences from the wild type are indicated 874
by * (P < 0.05). 875
(D) Fe content of leaves in 4-week-old plants grown in normal soils. 876
Significant differences from the wild type are indicated by * (P < 0.05). 877
878
Figure 6. Expression of Fe deficiency responsive genes in various transgenic 879
plants. Wild-type and transgenic plants were grown on +Fe media for 10 days, 880
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
40
then transferred to +Fe or –Fe media for 3 days. RNA was prepared from root 881
tissues. The data represent means (±SD) of three technical repeats from one 882
representative experiment. Significant differences from the corresponding 883
wild type are indicated by * (P < 0.05). 884
885
Figure 7. bHLH34 and bHLH104 activate the promoter of bHLH101. 886
(A) Schematic representation of the constructs used for transient expression 887
assays. The reporter construct consists of bHLH101 promoter, NLS sequence 888
fused with GFP coding sequence, and polyA terminator. Effector constructs 889
express Myc-bHLH34, Myc-bHLH104, and Myc-MYC2 under the control of 890
the CaMV 35S promoter. 891
(B) bHLH34 and bHLH104 activate the promoter of bHLH101 in transient 892
expression assays. The results are one representative of three biological 893
repeats. 894
(C) GFP transcript abundance. In the transient assays, Pro35S:Myc-GUS was 895
expressed as a control. GFP transcript abundance was normalized to GUS 896
transcript. The value with the empty vector as an effector was set to 1. The 897
results are means (±SD) of three technical repeats from one of three 898
biological repeats. Significant differences from the empty vector are indicated 899
by * (P < 0.05). 900
901
Figure 8. Overexpression of bHLH101 partially rescues bhlh34bhlh104. 902
(A) 10-day-old seedlings grown on +Fe or –Fe media. 903
(B) Root length of seedlings on +Fe or –Fe media .Values are means (±SD) 904
of 10 plants for each genotype. 905
(C) Chlorophyll content of seedlings on +Fe or –Fe media. Significant 906
differences from the wild type are indicated by * (P < 0.05). 907
(D) Expression of IRT1 and FRO2. Plants were grown on +Fe media for 10 908
days, then transferred to +Fe or –Fe media for 3 days. RNA was prepared 909
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
41
from root tissues. Significant differences from the corresponding wild type are 910
indicated by * (P < 0.05). 911
912
Figure 9. Interaction between bHLH34 and bHLH104. 913
(A) Yeast two hybrid assays. Representative growth status of yeast cells was 914
shown on SD/-LTHA agar media. 915
(B) BiFC assays. N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with different 916
combinations of the constructs. 917
(C) CoIP assays. Total protein was immunoprecipitated using Flag antibody, 918
and co-immunoprecipitated protein was then detected using Myc antibody. 919
920
Figure 10. Interactions between bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105. 921
(A). Yeast two-hybrid assays. Interaction was indicated by the ability of cells 922
to grow on synthetic dropout medium lacking Leu/Trp/His/Ade. C-terminal 923
truncated bHLH34 and bHLH104 and full-length bHLH105 were cloned into 924
pGBKT7, and full-length cDNAs of bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105 were 925
cloned into pGADT7, respectively. 926
(B). Fe-deficiency symptoms of various single and double mutants. 927
10-day-old seedlings germinated directly on –Fe or +Fe media. 928
929
Figure 11. GUS staining of ProbHLH34:GUS, ProbHLH104:GUS and 930
ProbHLH105:GUS seedlings. Two-week-old seedlings were used for GUS 931
staining. GUS staining of the root maturation regions, early lateral roots, root 932
tips, leaves, hypocotyls, and whole seedlings was shown. ep, epidermis; c, 933
cortex; e, endodermis; p, pericycle; el, elongation region of root tip; m, 934
meristem zone of root tip. 935
936
Figure 12. Fe deficiency responsive signaling pathway. 937
Fe deficiency stabilizes the BTS protein that interacts with bHLH104 and 938
bHLH105. bHLH34, bHLH104 and bHLH105 can form homodimers or 939
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
42
heterodimers to activate the transcription of bHLH38/39/100/101 and PYE. 940
FIT interacts with bHLH38/39/100/101 to activate the transcription of FRO2 941
and IRT1. PYE regulates the expression of ZIF1 and NAS4 negatively. 942
MYB10 and MYB72 regulate the expression of NAS4 positively. The induction 943
of MYB10/72 by Fe deficiency is partially dependent of FIT; and 944
bHLH34/104/105 are required for the induction of FIT and MYB10/72. 945
946
947
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 948
We thank TAIR (The Arabidopsis Information Resource) at the Ohio State 949
University for the T-DNA insertion mutants. 950
951
952
953
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Parsed CitationsClough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. PlantJ 16: 735-743
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Colangelo EP, Guerinot ML (2004) The essential basic helix-loop-helix protein FIT1 is required for the iron deficiency response.Plant Cell 16: 3400-3412
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Durrett TP, Gassmann W, Rogers EE (2007) The FRD3-mediated efflux of citrate into the root vasculature is necessary for efficientiron translocation. Plant Physiol 144: 197-205
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Eide D, Broderius M, Fett J, Guerinot ML (1996) A novel iron-regulated metal transporter from plants identified by functionalexpression in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 5624-5628
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Fernández-Calvo P, Chini A, Fernández-Barbero G, Chico JM, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Geerinck J, Eeckhout D, Schweizer F, Godoy M,Franco-Zorrilla JM, et al (2011) The Arabidopsis bHLH transcription factors MYC3 and MYC4 are targets of JAZ repressors and actadditively with MYC2 in the activation of jasmonate responses. Plant Cell 23: 701-715
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gamsjaeger R, Liew CK, Loughlin FE, Crossley M, Mackay JP (2007) Sticky fingers: zinc-fingers as protein-recognition motifs.Trends Biochem Sci 32: 63-70
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Grusak MA, Pezeshgi S (1996) Shoot-to-Root Signal Transmission Regulates Root Fe(III) Reductase Activity in the dgl Mutant ofPea. Plant Physiol 110: 329-334.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Gu Z, Steinmetz LM, Gu X, Scharfe C, Davis RW, Li WH (2003) Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against nullmutations. Nature 421: 63-66
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Hänsch R, Mendel RR (2009) Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl). Curr Opin Plant Biol12: 259-266
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Heim MA, Jakoby M, Werber M, Martin C, Weisshaar B, Bailey, PC (2003) The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family inplants: A genome-wide study of protein structure and functional diversity. Mol Biol.Evol 20: 735-747
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Henriques R, Jasik J, Klein M, Martinoia E, Feller U, Schell J, Pais MS, Koncz C (2002) Knock-out of Arabidopsis metal transportergene IRT1 results in iron deficiency accompanied by cell differentiation defects. Plant Mol Biol 50: 587-597
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Jakoby M, Wang HY, Reidt W, Weisshaar B, Bauer P (2004) FRU (BHLH029) is required for induction of iron mobilization genes inArabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett 577: 528-534.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Klatte M, Schuler M, Wirtz M, Fink-Straube C, Hell R, Bauer P (2009) The analysis of Arabidopsis nicotianamine synthase mutantsreveals functions for nicotianamine in seed iron loading and iron de ciency responses. Plant Physiol 150: 257-271
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Google Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kobayashi T, Nishizawa NK (2012) Iron uptake, translocation, and regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:131-152Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Kobayashi T, Nagasaka S, Senoura T, Itai RN, Nakanishi H, Nishizawa NK (2013) Iron-binding haemerythrin RING ubiquitin ligasesregulate plant iron responses and accumulation. Nat Commun 4: 2792
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Liang G, He H, Li Y, Yu D (2012) A new strategy for construction of artificial miRNA vectors in Arabidopsis. Planta 235: 1421-1429Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Lichtenthaler HK (1987) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148: 350-382Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Long TA, Tsukagoshi H, Busch W, Lahner B, Salt DE, Benfey PN (2010) The bHLH transcription factor POPEYE regulatesresponse to iron deficiency in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 22: 2219-2236
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Meiser J, Lingam S, Bauer P (2011) Posttranslational regulation of the iron deficiency basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor FITis affected by iron and nitric oxide. Plant Physiol 157: 2154-2166
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Morrissey J, Guerinot ML (2009) Iron uptake and transport in plants: the good, the bad, and the ionome. Chem Rev 109: 4553-4567Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Mori S (1999) Iron acquisition by plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2: 250-253Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Palmer CM, Hindt MN., Schmidt H, Clemens S, Guerinot ML (2013) MYB10 and MYB72 are required for growth under iron-limitingconditions. PLoS Genet 9(11): e1003953.
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Robinson NJ, Procter CM, Connolly EL, Guerinot ML (1999) A ferric-chelate reductase for iron uptake from soils. Nature 397: 694-697
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Salahudeen AA, Thompson JW, Ruiz JC, Ma HW, Kinch LN, Li Q, Grishin NV, Bruick RK (2009) An E3 ligase possessing an iron-responsive hemerythrin domain is a regulator of iron homeostasis. Science 326:722-726
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Santi S, Schmidt W (2009) Dissecting iron deficiency-induced proton extrusion in Arabidopsis roots. New Phytol 183:1072-1084Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Selote D, Samira R, Matthiadis A, Gillikin JW, Long TA (2015) Iron-binding E3 ligase mediates iron response in plants by targetingbasic helix-loop-helix transcription factors. Plant Physiol 167: 273-286
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Sivitz A, Grinvalds C, Barberon M, Curie C, Vert G (2011) Proteasome-mediated turnover of the transcriptional activator FIT isrequired for plant iron-deficiency responses. Plant J 66:1044-1052
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Takahashi M, Terada Y, Nakai I, Nakanishi H, Yoshimura E, Mori S, Nishizawa NK (2003) Role of nicotianamine in the intracellular www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
delivery of metals and plant reproductive development. Plant Cell 15:1263-1280Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Terry N (1998) Limiting factors in photosynthesis. I. Use of iron stress to control photochemical capacity in vivo. Plant Physiol 65:114-120
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Thomine S, Vert G (2013) Iron transport in plants: better be safe than sorry. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 16: 322-327Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vashisht AA, Zumbrennen KB, Huang X, Powers DN, Durazo A, Sun D, Bhaskaran N, Persson A, Uhlen M, Sangfelt O, et al (2009)Control of iron homeostasis by an iron-regulated ubiquitin ligase. Science 326: 718-721
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vert G, Grotz N, Dedaldechamp F, Gaymard F, Guerinot ML, Briat JF, Curie C (2002) IRT1, an Arabidopsis transporter essential foriron uptake from the soil and for plant growth. Plant Cell 14: 1223-1233
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Vert GA, Briat JF, Curie C (2003) Dual regulation of the Arabidopsis high-affinity root iron uptake system by local and long-distancesignals. Plant Physiol 132: 796-804
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Varotto C, Maiwald D., Pesaresi P, Jahns P, Salamini F, Leister D (2002) The metal ion transporter IRT1 is necessary for ironhomeostasis and efficient photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 31: 589-599
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang HY, Klatte M, Jakoby M, Bäumlein H, Weisshaar B, Bauer P (2007) Iron deficiency-mediated stress regulation of foursubgroup Ib BHLH genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 226: 897-908
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Wang N, Cui Y, Liu Y, Fan H, Du J, Huang Z, Yuan Y, Wu H, Ling HQ (2013) Requirement and functional redundancy of Ib subgroupbHLH proteins for iron deficiency responses and uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant 6: 503-513
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Walker EL, Connolly EL (2008) Time to pump iron: iron-deficiency-signaling mechanisms of higher plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:530-535
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yi Y, Guerinot ML (1996) Genetic evidence that induction of root Fe(III) chelate reductase activity is necessary for iron uptakeunder iron deficiency. Plant J 10: 835-844
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yuan Y, Zhang J., Wang DW, Ling HQ (2005) AtbHLH29 of Arabidopsis thaliana is a functional ortholog of tomato FER involved incontrolling iron acquisition in strategy I plants. Cell Res 15: 613-621
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Yuan Y, Wu H, Wang N, Li J, Zhao W, Du J, Wang D, Ling HQ (2008). FIT interacts with AtbHLH38 and AtbHLH39 in regulating ironuptake gene expression for iron homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Cell Res 18: 385-397
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
Zhang J, Liu B, Li M, Feng D, Jin H, Wang P, Liu J, Xiong F, Wang J, Wang HB (2015) The bHLH Transcription Factor bHLH104Interacts with IAA-LEUCINE RESISTANT3 and Modulates Iron Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27: 787-805
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from
Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Zhai Z, Gayomba SR, Jung HI, Vimalakumari NK, Piñeros M, Craft E, Rutzke MA, Danku J, Lahner B, Punshon T, et al (2014) OPT3 isa phloem-specific iron transporter that is essential for systemic iron signaling and redistribution of iron and cadmium inArabidopsis. Plant Cell 26: 2249-2264
Pubmed: Author and TitleCrossRef: Author and TitleGoogle Scholar: Author Only Title Only Author and Title
www.plantphysiol.orgon October 24, 2020 - Published by Downloaded from Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.