2 poks in natural science ”what we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”what...

18
2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is ”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists: claims accepted as knowlege in one context, and unacceptable in another.

Upload: corey-douglas

Post on 16-Jan-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

2 PoKs in natural science

• ”What we know something to be”

is not necessarily the same as

”What it is”.

• Influence of social-cultural context

on scientists: claims accepted as knowlege in one context, and

unacceptable in another.

Page 2: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

What carries genetic information?What is its structure?

• Late 1800s: DNA (de-oxyribose nucleic acid) found in the nucleus (together with proteins).

• Is DNA the hereditary material? (maybe proteins are?)

• What is the structure of DNA?

Page 3: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

The structure of DNA

Evidence from:• Biochemistry: phosphate groups, water, 4

different nitrogenous bases in equal ratios (Chargaff):

Adenine, Thymine

Cytosine, Guanine

Page 4: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

Physics, X-Ray diffraction images: a helical structure (Pauling – nobel laureate – 3

helices).

Page 5: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

Watson & Crick (in 1959)

Page 6: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

W & C present a first model

• Watson had listened to a presentation by Rosalind Franklin in which she estimated the amount of water based on her X-Ray diffraction patterns. They then built a model and presented it for peer review.

• But Watson did not take notes, remembered incorrectly, and when Franklin saw the model, her comments falsified it immediately.

• 1953: a revised model ..

Page 7: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:
Page 8: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

The original model (1953)

Page 9: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

DNA structure

Page 10: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:
Page 11: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

Biochemistry: bases in equal ratios

W & C: what can this mean?

Page 12: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

Ce n est pas un pipe ..

Page 13: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

The map is not the territory,the thing is not the thing named.

Bateson

Methods of verification .. The inevitability of uncertainty

Page 14: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

T. S. Eliot, The Hollow Men

Between the idea and the reality;

between the motion and the act,

Falls the shadow.

Between the conception and the creation;

between the emotion and the response,

Falls the shadow.

Page 15: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

Binomial system of nomenclature

• Carolus Linneaus (1707-1778).

• Kingdom (Animalia), Phylum (Vertebrata), Class (Mammalia), Order (Primates)

(genus) Homo, (species) sapiens

While modified, remains the standard over 200 yrs.

Page 16: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

Humans classified into sub-groups:

• Within Homo sapiens Linneaus proposed four taxa: americanus, asiaticus, africanus, europeanus, each race with characteristics endemic to individuals belonging to it:

Native Americans: reddish, stubborn, anger easily.

Africans: black, relaxed, negligent.

Asians: yellow, avaricious, easily distracted.

Europeans: white, gentle, and inventive.

Page 17: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

Linneaus now regarded as a father of scientific racism; subspecies (race) rejected.

Page 18: 2 PoKs in natural science ”What we know something to be” is not necessarily the same as ”What it is”. Influence of social-cultural context on scientists:

J. Marks, U. Calif. (1999) personal.uncc.edu/.../aaa/marksaaa99.htm

• “The claim that we are apes is not a fact of nature, but an artifact of the way we organize and divide nature”.

• “As a consequence, that claim has a lot more to do with the work of Durkheim and Mauss than with Darwin and Huxley. This is an obvious site for a biological anthropology – a field both anthropologically-informed and biologically meaningful. And it’s vacant at the moment. “