20 techupdate uv rg 1208uv controls. several manufacturers had new software versions to monitor the...

3
WATER QUALITY PRODUCTS 20 U ltraviolet (UV) technology is used in water and beverage bot- tling, generally under the clas- sification of “polisher,” as a secondary or tertiary treatment. It is accepted for posi- tive effects in reducing microbes without chemicals or disinfection byproducts; however, because it has no residual or dipstick measurement, laboratory effec- tiveness was extrapolated to the plant with few specific standards. During the late 1990s, it was discovered that UV could inactivate Cryptosporidium at low doses, and con- cern about disinfection byproducts spurred studies on what design and operational factors impacted UV effec- tiveness. As an instantaneous process, dose distribution is key because an overdose in one area cannot compen- sate for an underdose in another. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reacted to these devel- opments by investing nearly six years studying how to regulate and use UV. Working together, environmentalists, engineers, microbiologists, chemists, municipal water professionals, regulators and public health officials examined the European validation testing processes. Based on a dose measuring process called biodosimetry, Germans validated a sin- gle disinfection dose number—40—for all operating conditions based on “the Germicidal wavelength,” 253.7. They chartered extensive studies and eventually proved that uneven dose distribution, UV transmittance of the water and sensor performance play critical roles in reactor effectiveness and might not show up in a simple validation protocol, especially if there was no operational follow-through. The EPA’s stakeholder input process developed a consensus around UV—a key step toward fitting it into a U.S. drinking water framework. It was decided that: • UV is a powerful disinfectant when engineered properly; • Measuring and validating UV dose requires detailed protocols and standards that consider hydraulics, fouling and nonuniform lamp aging and mercury lamp breakage; • A single wavelength standard is the easiest to use but not all organisms respond uniformly to monochromatic UV; and • To protect public health, operational and maintenance standards must be established. Regulating UV This consensus became the foundation of the EPA’s regulatory scheme. Because UV could be a solution to Cryptosporidium and Giardia as well as a nonchemical, no-disinfection-byproduct alternative to chlorine and ozone, the EPA protocol Table 1. Summary of LT2ESWTR Validation Requirements REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS CITATION Validated operating conditions must include Flow rate UV intensity as measured by a UV sensor UV lamp status 40 CFR 141.720 (d)(2) Validation testing must include 1 Full-scale testing of a reactor that confirms uniformly to the UV reactors used by the water system Inactivation of a test mircoorganism whose dose-response characteristics have been qualified with a low-pressure mercury vapor lamp 40 CFR 141.720 (d)(2)(ii) Validation testing must account for UV absorbance of the water Lamp fouling and aging Measurement uncertainty of on-line sensors UV dose distributions arising from the velocity profiles through the reactor Failure of UV lamps or other critical components Inlet and outlet piping or channel configurations of the UV reactor 40 CFR 141.720 (d)(2)(i) 1 The state may approve an alternative approach to validation testing. By Phyllis Posy the new UV New EPA guidelines on UV help bottlers achieve microbial control tech update 20_TechUpdate_UV_RG_1208.indd 20 20_TechUpdate_UV_RG_1208.indd 20 11/14/08 2:36:44 PM 11/14/08 2:36:44 PM

Upload: others

Post on 25-Mar-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 20 TechUpdate UV RG 1208UV controls. Several manufacturers had new software versions to monitor the UV disinfection process. Hydro-optic UV dis-infection provides specifics about the

WATER QUALITY PRODUCTS20

Ultraviolet (UV) technology is used in water and beverage bot-tling, generally under the clas-

sification of “polisher,” as a secondary or tertiary treatment. It is accepted for posi-tive effects in reducing microbes without chemicals or disinfection byproducts; however, because it has no residual or dipstick measurement, laboratory effec-tiveness was extrapolated to the plant with few specific standards.

During the late 1990s, it was discovered that UV could inactivate Cryptosporidium at low doses, and con-cern about disinfection byproducts spurred studies on what design and operational factors impacted UV effec-tiveness. As an instantaneous process, dose distribution is key because an overdose in one area cannot compen-sate for an underdose in another.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reacted to these devel-opments by investing nearly six years studying how to regulate and use UV. Working together, environmentalists, engineers, microbiologists, chemists, municipal water professionals, regulators and public health officials examined the European validation testing processes. Based on a dose measuring process called biodosimetry, Germans validated a sin-gle disinfection dose number—40—for all operating conditions based on “the

Germicidal wavelength,” 253.7. They chartered extensive studies and eventually proved that uneven dose distribution, UV transmittance of the water and sensor performance play critical roles in reactor effectiveness and might not show up in a simple validation protocol, especially if there was no operational follow-through.

The EPA’s stakeholder input process developed a consensus around UV—a key step toward fitting it into a U.S. drinking water framework. It was decided that: • UV is a powerful disinfectant when engineered properly; • Measuring and validating UV dose requires detailed protocols and standards that consider hydraulics, fouling and nonuniform lamp aging and mercury lamp breakage; • A single wavelength standard is the easiest to use but not all organisms respond uniformly to monochromatic UV; and • To protect public health, operational and maintenance standards must be established.

Regulating UVThis consensus became the foundation

of the EPA’s regulatory scheme. Because UV could be a solution to Cryptosporidium and Giardia as well as a nonchemical, no-disinfection-byproduct altern ative to chlorine and ozone, the EPA protocol

Table 1. Summary of LT2ESWTR Validation Requirements

REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONS CITATION

Validated operating conditions must include • Flow rate • UV intensity as measured by a UV sensor • UV lamp status

40 CFR 141.720 (d)(2)

Validation testing must include 1

• Full-scale testing of a reactor that confirms uniformly to the UV reactors used by the water system • Inactivation of a test mircoorganism whose dose-response characteristics have been qualified with a low-pressure mercury vapor lamp

40 CFR 141.720 (d)(2)(ii)

Validation testing must account for

• UV absorbance of the water • Lamp fouling and aging • Measurement uncertainty of on-line sensors • UV dose distributions arising from the velocity profiles through the reactor • Failure of UV lamps or other critical components • Inlet and outlet piping or channel configurations of the UV reactor

40 CFR 141.720 (d)(2)(i)

1 The state may approve an alternative approach to validation testing.

By Phyllis Posy

the new

UVNew EPA guidelines on

UV help bottlers achieve microbial control

tech update

20_TechUpdate_UV_RG_1208.indd 2020_TechUpdate_UV_RG_1208.indd 20 11/14/08 2:36:44 PM11/14/08 2:36:44 PM

Page 2: 20 TechUpdate UV RG 1208UV controls. Several manufacturers had new software versions to monitor the UV disinfection process. Hydro-optic UV dis-infection provides specifics about the

212008-2009 REFERENCE GUIDE

validates more than one dose level and verifies operational integrity on a continuous basis.

The final UV Disinfection Guidance Manual (Nov. 2006) requires 95% of the water delivered to customers be dis-infected to the validated dose based on a thorough full-scale validation, and that monthly reports comply with monitoring, reporting and sensor calibration require-ments and proper system maintenance.

All aspects—including lamp aging, fouling patters, sensor drift and dose distribution—are cov-ered by the detailed EPA validation protocol and regulatory monitor-ing regime. The EPA provides both a Setpoint Approach, which alarms when a set point is not achieved, and a Calculated Dose Approach, which provides a specific dose number at any point. There are two aspects: • Biodosimetry determines the actual reactor dose based on a microbe challenge test. A validation factor discounts the dose for various types of uncertainty associated with the specific reactor characteristics and operations. This process determines the permitted operational envelope of UVT, flow and UV intensity. • Technical and functional testing of the components, which may trigger additional discounting factors.

Thus, when the EPA says a reac-tor must produce a specific dose to achieve a particular disinfection credit (e.g., a dose of 12 mJ/cm² for 3-log Crypto treatment), it means the dose after all discount factors have been applied.

The EPA grandfathers the German validated dose of 40 mJ/cm² to be equiv-alent to 3-log Crypto treatment (EPA validated dose of 12 mJ/cm²). The EPA only allows virus credit for reactors validated under the EPA protocol that achieves the required dose. So while the Europeans set their dose of 40 mJ/cm² to include some general safety factors, the EPA dose calculation uses specific validation factors to discount an individ-ual reactor based on performance.

Innovation & the IndustryWhile the EPA validation has

spurred technological developments write in 751

At AdEdge, we’re not only proud of the proven long-lasting performance of ourwater treatment systems featuring AdEdge Bayoxide® E33 and AD26™media, we’re proud of the proven long lasting performance of our company.No other company specializing in arsenic removal technology has been in busi-ness longer than AdEdge. No other company has more arsenic removal systemsinstalled across North America than AdEdge. When you need to count on a sys-tem and the company that supports it, Get AdEdge...because experience counts!

Our media lasts longer than our competitors do.

Treatment Solutions for Small Water SystemsAdEdge Technologies Inc, Buford, GA

Toll Free 1.866.823.3343 678-835-0052 Fax [email protected] www.adedgetechnologies.com

and enhanced knowledge of the reliabil-ity and effectiveness of UV systems, the traditional “it-can’t-hurt” attitude has yet to be replaced by strong standards in the bottling industries.

A more knowledgeable market has spurred the development of systems that take dose distribution seriously, such as computational fluid dynamics modeling for designing reactors, dyed microspheres to measure dose distribution and hydro-optic

disinfection, which provides uniform dose distribution. The focus on dose and reactor control spurred innovations in software and user interface as well.

Recently validated based on the final EPA protocol, hydro-optic disinfection by Atlantium Technologies exemplifies this innovation. It uses a quartz reactor and fiber-optic technology to achieve a high log kill with medium-pressure mercury lights out of the water so there is no risk

20_TechUpdate_UV_RG_1208.indd 2120_TechUpdate_UV_RG_1208.indd 21 11/14/08 2:36:35 PM11/14/08 2:36:35 PM

Page 3: 20 TechUpdate UV RG 1208UV controls. Several manufacturers had new software versions to monitor the UV disinfection process. Hydro-optic UV dis-infection provides specifics about the

WATER QUALITY PRODUCTS22

tech update

LearnMore! For more information

related to this article, visit

www.wqpmag.com/lm.cfm/wq120803

For more information on this subject,

write in 1013 on the reader service card.www.shelco.com

All Stainless...All Shelco Quality. Shelco introduces the first all-Stainless-Steel high-flow filter housing to the filtration

market. The extra large housing will accept most 4 ½” diameter filter cartridges for

your extra heavy sediment applications or where high flows are required. The

all-Stainless-Steel construction offers a wide variety of fluid compatibility and higher

temperature ranges than standard polypropylene vessels. The ring nut sealing

arrangement makes for easy cartridge changes and each housing comes with a bracket

mounting kit for quick installations. The inline inlet and outlet connections make this

housing ideal for skid mounting. Available in 10”and 20” lengths, these housings are

the perfect choice when only stainless steel will do.

100 Bradley StreetMiddletown, CT860.854.6121

Process Water • Drinking Water • Waste Water • Beverages

One choice. One call.

SHELCOFILTERS

write in 776

of mercury. The inlet/outlet bells protect the hydraulic integrity of the chamber and assure that upstream or downstream hydraulic changes do not compromise reactor effectiveness. An ultrasonic clean-ing system shakes any potential deposits loose, keeping the quartz surfaces clean.

One key area of innovation has been UV controls. Several manufacturers had

new software versions to monitor the UV disinfection process. Hydro-optic UV dis-infection provides specifics about the dose, flow and UVT on a real-time basis. It obtains this data from two separate sensors per lamp, stores it in an extensive database and uses it to generate EPA reports.

Research and innovation in UV disin-fection means validated UV disinfection

systems with good dose controls, inter-nal UVT monitors and uniform dose distribution that protects the entire water treatment process and helps water bottling and beverage plants reduce chemical disinfectants. Even the traditional uses of UV, such as after reverse osmosis and for recirculat-ing finished water storage tanks, now can get improved log reductions and serious microbial control.

Bottlers who maintain a bulk chlo-rinated water supply for batching can consider eliminating the use of chlorine and instead use a properly sized EPA-validated UV system. UV can be added in-line prior to the batch tank with a continual UV recirculation loop. By eliminating the chlorine from the pro-cess, the bottler also reduces the threat of THMs in the finished product as well as maintenance issues associated with the use of granular activated car-bon (GAC), often used to remove chlo-rine. Whether it is the chlorine trickle-through, a serious breakthrough or carbon filter traps that become a new microbial haven, GAC towers can be susceptible to contamination. UV can provide an alternative, or where the GAC is removing many contaminants, a barrier against microbial risks to process and product water.

The use of UV is especially benefi-cial for bottling sensitive beverages. The use of medium-pressure UV on the rinse water supply will reduce the risk of algae contamination and control Pseudomonas, Crypto, Giardia and other microbes that are not as susceptible to chlorine, and it provides better overall microbial integ-rity of the rinse water. wqp

Phyllis Posy is vice president,

strategic services and regulatory

affairs, for Atlantium Technologies.

Posy can be reached by e-mail at

[email protected].

20_TechUpdate_UV_RG_1208.indd 2220_TechUpdate_UV_RG_1208.indd 22 11/14/08 2:35:02 PM11/14/08 2:35:02 PM