2000055 sspppeeeccciiiaaalll eeddduuucccaaatttiiiooonnn lre report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 ages 6-21...

29
2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 S S S P P P E E E C C C I I I A A A L L L E E E D D D U U U C C C A A A T T T I I I O O O N N N E E E N N N R R R O O O L L L L L L M M M E E E N N N T T T A A A N N N A A A L L L Y Y Y S S S I I I S S S - - - R R R E E E P P P O O O R R R T T T December 2006 Compiled by The Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Upload: others

Post on 11-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

222000000555 SSSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN EEENNNRRROOOLLLLLLMMMEEENNNTTT AAANNNAAALLLYYYSSSIIISSS ---

RRREEEPPPOOORRRTTT

December 2006

Compiled by

The Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Page 2: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

222000000555 SSSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN EEENNNRRROOOLLLLLLMMMEEENNNTTT AAANNNAAALLLYYYSSSIIISSS

Report

The following pages represent a composite presentation of student enrollment data in 54 of the Collaborative’s member school districts. The data are those submitted to their respective state departments of education and/or the Federal Office of Special Education Programs as part of the districts’ annual reporting requirements. The member school district’s special education placement data is presented in the following tables:

2005 K-12 Special Education Enrollment sorted by city 2005 K-12 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2005 Preschool Special Education Enrollment 1998-2005 Comparison of K-12 Special Education Enrollment

National and state-by-state special education enrollment data for the 2004-2005 school year can be viewed, along with other special education related data, at http://www.ideadata.org. The data, detailed in the following tables, are included to provide a frame of reference for member school districts:

2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state

Within each table, the column labels refer to the following definitions determined by the Federal guidelines:

Full Inclusion Program includes students who receive services outside the general education classroom for less than 21% of the time. This may include students with disabilities placed in: public preschools, head start, child care, nursery school facilities, or other community-based settings with Special Education provided outside of the regular class for less than 21% of the time; separate school/early childhood combinations; regular class with special/related services provided outside the regular class for less than 21% of the time; home-schooled and receiving Special Education services outside the general education classroom for less than 21% of the time; students in a correctional facility/DYS/DSS and receiving Special Education services outside the general education classroom for less than 21% of the time; or collaborative programs within a public school building that provide educational services primarily to students with disabilities. Partial Inclusion Program includes students who receive special education and related services outside of the regular classroom for at least 21 percent but no more than 60 percent of the school day. This may include students placed in: public preschools, head start, child care, nursery school facilities, or other community-based settings with special education provided outside of the regular class for 21% to 60% of the time; regular classes with special education provided outside of the regular

Page 3: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

class for 21% to 60% of the time; home-schooled and receiving Special Education services outside the general education classroom for at least 21% and no more than 60% of the time; students in a correctional facility/DYS/DSS and receiving Special Education services outside the general education classroom for at least 21% and not more than 60% of the time; or collaborative programs within a public school building that provide educational services primarily to students with disabilities. Substantially Separate Classroom includes students who receive special education and related services outside the regular class for more than 60 percent of the school day. This category may include students placed in: public preschools, head start, child care, nursery school facilities, or other community-based settings with special education provided outside of the regular class for more than 60% of the time; regular classes with special education provided outside of the regular class for more than 60% of the time; self-contained special classrooms for more than 60% of the time with instruction in a regular class; home-schooled and receiving Special Education services outside the general education classroom for more than 60% of the time; students in a correctional facility/DYS/DSS and receiving Special Education services outside the general education classroom for more than 60% of the time; or collaborative programs within a public school building that provide educational services primarily to students with disabilities. Separate Day School includes students who receive special education and related services in a public or private separate day school The private separate facility must be a special education program located in a building or facility outside of the general education environment that provides educational services primarily to students with disabilities is approved under 603 CMR 28.09. Residential School includes students who receive special education and related services, at public expense, in a public or a private residential facility. The residential facility must be a special education program located in a building or facility outside of the general education environment that provides educational services primarily to students with disabilities and is approved under 603 CMR 28.09. Homebound / Hospital environment includes students who are at home or in a hospital pursuant to doctors' orders and who are receiving all of their special education and related services in the principal residence of the students' family or caregivers or at hospital facilities.

The purpose in collecting, organizing, and presenting these data is to provide Collaborative members an opportunity to compare their own district’s special education enrollment and placement patterns with those of other urban school districts across the country. Such quantitative comparisons contribute to the kind of self-analysis that the Collaborative is dedicated to promote within and across its member districts.

December 2006

Page 4: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

222000000555 KKK---111222 SSSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN

EEENNNRRROOOLLLLLLMMMEEENNNTTT DDDAAATTTAAA

Sorted by City

Page 5: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment AnalysisDecember 2005

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

City State Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

Akron, OH OH 27,289 4,373 16.02% 1,431 32.72% 1,708 39.06% 1,052 24.06% 142 3.25% 35 0.80% 5 0.11%

Arlington, VA VA 18,333 2,652 14.47% 1,413 53.28% 762 28.73% 401 15.12% 48 1.81% 20 0.75% 8 0.30%

Atlanta, GA GA 49,734 4,742 9.53% 2,442 51.50% 867 18.28% 1,141 24.06% 8 0.17% - 0.00% 6 0.13%

Atlantic City, NJ NJ 7,900 953 12.06% 221 23.19% 371 38.93% 232 24.34% 119 12.49% 3 0.31% 7 0.73%

Austin, TX TX 81,155 9,382 11.56% 5,125 54.63% 2,758 29.40% 1,367 14.57% 66 0.70% - 0.00% 66 0.70%

Brockton, MA MA 15,884 2,170 13.66% 1,309 60.32% 254 11.71% 481 22.17% 64 2.95% 60 2.76% 2 0.09%

Buffalo, NY NY 36,706 9,423 25.67% 5,276 55.99% 1,215 12.89% 2,164 22.97% 406 4.31% 362 3.84% - 0.00%

Calgary, AB (Canada) AB 96,931 17,132 17.67% 13,128 76.63% - 0.00% 3,065 17.89% 921 5.38% - 0.00% 18 0.11%

Central Falls, RI RI 3,424 891 26.02% 397 44.56% 203 22.78% 216 24.24% 58 6.51% 11 1.23% 6 0.67%

Chicago, IL IL 424,000 50,585 11.93% 20,247 40.03% 14,011 27.70% 13,382 26.45% 2,870 5.67% 75 0.15% - 0.00%

Chicago Heights, IL (Flossmoor) IL 2,669 269 10.08% 175 65.06% 30 11.15% 62 23.05% 2 0.74% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Chicopee, MA MA 7,532 1,048 13.91% 443 42.27% 182 17.37% 373 35.59% 33 3.15% 13 1.24% 4 0.38%

Cincinnati, OH OH 35,563 6,753 18.99% 2,891 42.81% 1,757 26.02% 1,413 20.92% 503 7.45% 71 1.05% 118 1.75%

Clark County, NV NV 294,271 28,208 9.59% 14,150 50.16% 9,334 33.09% 4,163 14.76% 482 1.71% - 0.00% 79 0.28%

Denver, CO CO 73,018 8,871 12.15% 5,876 66.24% 1,413 15.93% 1,029 11.60% 494 5.57% - 0.00% 59 0.67%

Detroit, MI MI 131,643 19,124 14.53% 5,318 27.81% 1,998 10.45% 9,983 52.20% 1,824 9.54% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Evanston, IL IL 6,629 1,024 15.45% 603 58.89% 197 19.24% 169 16.50% 25 2.44% 30 2.93% - 0.00%

Everett, MA MA 5,347 834 15.60% 373 44.72% 214 25.66% 132 15.83% 100 11.99% 14 1.68% 1 0.12%

Fitchburg, MA MA 5,682 1,078 18.97% 776 71.99% - 0.00% 220 20.41% 79 7.33% 2 0.19% 1 0.09%

Greenville, SC SC 64,992 11,059 17.02% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Hartford, CT CT 24,435 3,855 15.78% 2,382 61.79% 459 11.91% 593 15.38% 160 4.15% 261 6.77% - 0.00%

Houston, TX TX 210,292 16,839 8.01% 6,284 37.32% 6,810 40.44% 3,414 20.27% 195 1.16% 19 0.11% 117 0.69%

Indianapolis, IN IN 39,311 6,435 16.37% 3,565 55.40% 1,217 18.91% 1,357 21.09% 21 0.33% 137 2.13% 138 2.14%

Indianapolis, IN (Washington Township) IN 10,202 1,337 13.11% 914 68.36% 295 22.06% 116 8.68% 6 0.45% - 0.00% 6 0.45%

1

Page 6: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment AnalysisDecember 2005

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

City State Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

Inkster, MI MI 1,500 356 23.73% 219 61.52% 63 17.70% 30 8.43% 43 12.08% 1 0.28% - 0.00%

Jersey City, NJ NJ 31,263 4,110 13.15% 1,368 33.28% 1,358 33.04% 1,155 28.10% 215 5.23% 1 0.02% 13 0.32%

Kalamazoo, MI MI 10,432 1,326 12.71% 509 38.39% 535 40.35% 192 14.48% 90 6.79% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Katy, TX TX 52,800 2,362 4.47% 839 35.52% 1,016 43.01% 491 20.79% - 0.00% - 0.00% 16 0.68%

Long Beach, CA CA 93,589 6,516 6.96% 3,522 54.05% 345 5.29% 2,443 37.49% 91 1.40% 101 1.55% 14 0.21%

Los Angeles, CA CA 727,319 77,722 10.69% 37,095 47.73% 11,719 15.08% 21,672 27.88% 6,491 8.35% 606 0.78% 139 0.18%

Madison, WI WI 24,561 4,127 16.80% 2,804 67.94% 767 18.58% 551 13.35% - 0.00% 5 0.12% - 0.00%

Memphis, TN TN 125,322 13,443 10.73% 5,914 43.99% 4,502 33.49% 2,856 21.25% 89 0.66% 21 0.16% 61 0.45%

Miami, FL (Miami Dade) FL 358,545 39,769 11.09% 16,057 40.38% 11,323 28.47% 11,786 29.64% 120 0.30% 25 0.06% 458 1.15%

New Bedford, MA MA 13,352 2,447 18.33% 1,470 60.07% 565 23.09% 284 11.61% 122 4.99% 4 0.16% 2 0.08%

Newport, RI RI 2,500 634 25.36% 463 73.00% 139 22.00% - 0.00% 13 2.00% 8 1.28% - 0.00%

Passaic, NJ NJ 13,510 2,436 18.03% 803 32.96% 465 19.09% 609 25.00% 532 21.84% 2 0.08% 25 1.03%

Philadelphia, PA PA 228,903 35,063 15.32% 15,707 44.80% 11,798 33.65% 7,514 21.43% 17 0.05% 10 0.03% 17 0.05%

Pittsburgh, PA PA 34,418 8,722 25.34% 4,397 50.41% 3,459 39.66% 465 5.33% 686 7.87% 1 0.01% - 0.00%

Portland, OR OR 45,563 6,576 14.43% 4,759 72.37% 739 11.24% 843 12.82% 206 3.13% 10 0.15% 19 0.29%

Racine, WI WI 21,393 3,225 15.08% 1,240 38.45% 1,425 44.19% 553 17.15% - 0.00% 6 0.19% 1 0.03%

Rockland, MD (Montgomery) MD 139,387 15,757 11.30% 8,990 57.05% 2,452 15.56% 3,256 20.66% 1,016 6.45% 19 0.12% 24 0.15%

Round Rock, TX TX 37,786 3,439 9.10% 2,196 63.86% 837 24.34% 366 10.64% 12 0.35% - 0.00% 28 0.81%

Salem, MA MA 4,774 910 19.06% 384 42.20% 222 24.40% 163 17.91% 129 14.18% 11 1.21% 1 0.11%

San Antonio, TX (Northside) TX 77,978 9,956 12.77% 6,832 68.62% 1,657 16.64% 1,201 12.06% 171 1.72% 58 0.58% 37 0.37%

San Diego, CA CA 134,930 14,265 10.57% 10,689 74.93% 629 4.41% 2,271 15.92% 629 4.41% 12 0.08% 35 0.25%

South Bend, IN IN 22,100 4,014 18.16% 1,441 35.90% 944 23.52% 1,581 39.39% 4 0.10% 35 0.87% 9 0.22%

Springfield, MA MA 25,810 5,256 20.36% 1,255 23.88% 1,852 35.24% 1,722 32.76% 398 7.57% 17 0.32% 12 0.23%

Tampa, FL (Hillsborough) FL 193,631 28,064 14.49% 16,540 58.94% 4,766 16.98% 5,330 18.99% 1,185 4.22% 4 0.01% 239 0.85%

Tempe, AZ (Kyrene) AZ 18,774 1,721 9.17% 952 55.32% 576 33.47% 183 10.63% 8 0.46% - 0.00% 2 0.12%

2

Page 7: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment AnalysisDecember 2005

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

City State Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

Waukegan, IL IL 16,253 2,055 12.64% 814 39.61% 412 20.05% 744 36.20% 43 2.09% 41 2.00% 1 0.05%

Webster, MA MA 1,984 308 15.52% 218 70.78% 31 10.06% 26 8.44% 29 9.42% 4 1.30% - 0.00%

Worcester, MA MA 24,950 4,425 17.74% 1,737 39.25% 1,222 27.62% 1,064 24.05% 364 8.23% 35 0.79% 3 0.07%

Yonkers, NY NY 26,220 3,630 13.84% 1,632 44.96% 38 1.05% 1,706 47.00% 221 6.09% 21 0.58% 12 0.33%

St. Thomas, VI VI 16,823 1,539 9.15% 624 40.55% 487 31.64% 386 25.08% 14 0.91% 25 1.62% 3 0.19%

Collaborative Totals 4,199,312 513,210 12.22% 246,209 47.97% 112,398 21.90% 117,968 22.99% 21,564 4.20% 2,196 0.43% 1,812 0.35%

Collaborative Averages 9,504 14.71% 4,645 49.93% 2,121 22.12% 2,226 20.49% 407 4.45% 41 0.75% 34 0.33%

3

Page 8: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

222000000555 KKK---111222 SSSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN

EEENNNRRROOOLLLLLLMMMEEENNNTTT DDDAAATTTAAA

Sorted by State

Page 9: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment AnalysisDecember 2005

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

Calgary, AB (Canada) 96,931 17,132 17.67% 13,128 76.63% - 0.00% 3,065 17.89% 921 5.38% - 0.00% 18 0.11%

Tempe, AZ (Kyrene) 18,774 1,721 9.17% 952 55.32% 576 33.47% 183 10.63% 8 0.46% - 0.00% 2 0.12%

Long Beach, CA 93,589 6,516 6.96% 3,522 54.05% 345 5.29% 2,443 37.49% 91 1.40% 101 1.55% 14 0.21%

Los Angeles, CA 727,319 77,722 10.69% 37,095 47.73% 11,719 15.08% 21,672 27.88% 6,491 8.35% 606 0.78% 139 0.18%

San Diego, CA 134,930 14,265 10.57% 10,689 74.93% 629 4.41% 2,271 15.92% 629 4.41% 12 0.08% 35 0.25%

Denver, CO 73,018 8,871 12.15% 5,876 66.24% 1,413 15.93% 1,029 11.60% 494 5.57% - 0.00% 59 0.67%

Hartford, CT 24,435 3,855 15.78% 2,382 61.79% 459 11.91% 593 15.38% 160 4.15% 261 6.77% - 0.00%

Miami, FL (Miami Dade) 358,545 39,769 11.09% 16,057 40.38% 11,323 28.47% 11,786 29.64% 120 0.30% 25 0.06% 458 1.15%

Tampa, FL (Hillsborough) 193,631 28,064 14.49% 16,540 58.94% 4,766 16.98% 5,330 18.99% 1,185 4.22% 4 0.01% 239 0.85%

Atlanta, GA 49,734 4,742 9.53% 2,442 51.50% 867 18.28% 1,141 24.06% 8 0.17% - 0.00% 6 0.13%

Chicago Heights, IL (Flossmoor) 2,669 269 10.08% 175 65.06% 30 11.15% 62 23.05% 2 0.74% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Chicago, IL 424,000 50,585 11.93% 20,247 40.03% 14,011 27.70% 13,382 26.45% 2,870 5.67% 75 0.15% - 0.00%

Evanston, IL 6,629 1,024 15.45% 603 58.89% 197 19.24% 169 16.50% 25 2.44% 30 2.93% - 0.00%

Waukegan, IL 16,253 2,055 12.64% 814 39.61% 412 20.05% 744 36.20% 43 2.09% 41 2.00% 1 0.05%

Indianapolis, IN 39,311 6,435 16.37% 3,565 55.40% 1,217 18.91% 1,357 21.09% 21 0.33% 137 2.13% 138 2.14%

Indianapolis, IN (Washington Township) 10,202 1,337 13.11% 914 68.36% 295 22.06% 116 8.68% 6 0.45% - 0.00% 6 0.45%

South Bend, IN 22,100 4,014 18.16% 1,441 35.90% 944 23.52% 1,581 39.39% 4 0.10% 35 0.87% 9 0.22%

Brockton, MA 15,884 2,170 13.66% 1,309 60.32% 254 11.71% 481 22.17% 64 2.95% 60 2.76% 2 0.09%

Chicopee, MA 7,532 1,048 13.91% 443 42.27% 182 17.37% 373 35.59% 33 3.15% 13 1.24% 4 0.38%

Everett, MA 5,347 834 15.60% 373 44.72% 214 25.66% 132 15.83% 100 11.99% 14 1.68% 1 0.12%

Fitchburg, MA 5,682 1,078 18.97% 776 71.99% - 0.00% 220 20.41% 79 7.33% 2 0.19% 1 0.09%

New Bedford, MA 13,352 2,447 18.33% 1,470 60.07% 565 23.09% 284 11.61% 122 4.99% 4 0.16% 2 0.08%

Salem, MA 4,774 910 19.06% 384 42.20% 222 24.40% 163 17.91% 129 14.18% 11 1.21% 1 0.11%

1

Page 10: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment AnalysisDecember 2005

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

Springfield, MA 25,810 5,256 20.36% 1,255 23.88% 1,852 35.24% 1,722 32.76% 398 7.57% 17 0.32% 12 0.23%

Webster, MA 1,984 308 15.52% 218 70.78% 31 10.06% 26 8.44% 29 9.42% 4 1.30% - 0.00%

Worcester, MA 24,950 4,425 17.74% 1,737 39.25% 1,222 27.62% 1,064 24.05% 364 8.23% 35 0.79% 3 0.07%

Rockland, MD (Montgomery) 139,387 15,757 11.30% 8,990 57.05% 2,452 15.56% 3,256 20.66% 1,016 6.45% 19 0.12% 24 0.15%

Detroit, MI 131,643 19,124 14.53% 5,318 27.81% 1,998 10.45% 9,983 52.20% 1,824 9.54% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Inkster, MI 1,500 356 23.73% 219 61.52% 63 17.70% 30 8.43% 43 12.08% 1 0.28% - 0.00%

Kalamazoo, MI 10,432 1,326 12.71% 509 38.39% 535 40.35% 192 14.48% 90 6.79% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Atlantic City, NJ 7,900 953 12.06% 221 23.19% 371 38.93% 232 24.34% 119 12.49% 3 0.31% 7 0.73%

Jersey City, NJ 31,263 4,110 13.15% 1,368 33.28% 1,358 33.04% 1,155 28.10% 215 5.23% 1 0.02% 13 0.32%

Passaic, NJ 13,510 2,436 18.03% 803 32.96% 465 19.09% 609 25.00% 532 21.84% 2 0.08% 25 1.03%

Clark County, NV 294,271 28,208 9.59% 14,150 50.16% 9,334 33.09% 4,163 14.76% 482 1.71% - 0.00% 79 0.28%

Buffalo, NY 36,706 9,423 25.67% 5,276 55.99% 1,215 12.89% 2,164 22.97% 406 4.31% 362 3.84% - 0.00%

Yonkers, NY 26,220 3,630 13.84% 1,632 44.96% 38 1.05% 1,706 47.00% 221 6.09% 21 0.58% 12 0.33%

Akron, OH 27,289 4,373 16.02% 1,431 32.72% 1,708 39.06% 1,052 24.06% 142 3.25% 35 0.80% 5 0.11%

Cincinnati, OH 35,563 6,753 18.99% 2,891 42.81% 1,757 26.02% 1,413 20.92% 503 7.45% 71 1.05% 118 1.75%

Portland, OR 45,563 6,576 14.43% 4,759 72.37% 739 11.24% 843 12.82% 206 3.13% 10 0.15% 19 0.29%

Philadelphia, PA 228,903 35,063 15.32% 15,707 44.80% 11,798 33.65% 7,514 21.43% 17 0.05% 10 0.03% 17 0.05%

Pittsburgh, PA 34,418 8,722 25.34% 4,397 50.41% 3,459 39.66% 465 5.33% 686 7.87% 1 0.01% - 0.00%

Central Falls, RI 3,424 891 26.02% 397 44.56% 203 22.78% 216 24.24% 58 6.51% 11 1.23% 6 0.67%

Newport, RI 2,500 634 25.36% 463 73.00% 139 22.00% - 0.00% 13 2.00% 8 1.28% - 0.00%

Greenville, SC 64,992 11,059 17.02% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Memphis, TN 125,322 13,443 10.73% 5,914 43.99% 4,502 33.49% 2,856 21.25% 89 0.66% 21 0.16% 61 0.45%

Austin, TX 81,155 9,382 11.56% 5,125 54.63% 2,758 29.40% 1,367 14.57% 66 0.70% - 0.00% 66 0.70%

2

Page 11: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment AnalysisDecember 2005

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

Houston, TX 210,292 16,839 8.01% 6,284 37.32% 6,810 40.44% 3,414 20.27% 195 1.16% 19 0.11% 117 0.69%

Katy, TX 52,800 2,362 4.47% 839 35.52% 1,016 43.01% 491 20.79% - 0.00% - 0.00% 16 0.68%

Round Rock, TX 37,786 3,439 9.10% 2,196 63.86% 837 24.34% 366 10.64% 12 0.35% - 0.00% 28 0.81%

San Antonio, TX (Northside) 77,978 9,956 12.77% 6,832 68.62% 1,657 16.64% 1,201 12.06% 171 1.72% 58 0.58% 37 0.37%

Arlington, VA 18,333 2,652 14.47% 1,413 53.28% 762 28.73% 401 15.12% 48 1.81% 20 0.75% 8 0.30%

St. Thomas, VI 16,823 1,539 9.15% 624 40.55% 487 31.64% 386 25.08% 14 0.91% 25 1.62% 3 0.19%

Madison, WI 24,561 4,127 16.80% 2,804 67.94% 767 18.58% 551 13.35% - 0.00% 5 0.12% - 0.00%

Racine, WI 21,393 3,225 15.08% 1,240 38.45% 1,425 44.19% 553 17.15% - 0.00% 6 0.19% 1 0.03%

Collaborative Totals 4,199,312 513,210 12.22% 246,209 47.97% 112,398 21.90% 117,968 22.99% 21,564 4.20% 2,196 0.43% 1,812 0.35%

Collaborative Averages 9,504 14.71% 4,645 49.93% 2,121 22.12% 2,226 20.49% 407 4.45% 41 0.75% 34 0.33%

3

Page 12: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

222000000555 PPPRRREEESSSCCCHHHOOOOOOLLL SSSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN EEENNNRRROOOLLLLLLMMMEEENNNTTT DDDAAATTTAAA

Sorted by City

Page 13: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Preschool (ages 3-5) Special Education Enrollment AnalysisDecember 2005

Total Preschool SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

City State Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School School Hospital

Akron, OH OH 27,289 321 1.18% 217 67.60% 84 26.17% 16 4.98% 4 1.25% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Arlington, VA VA 18,333 330 1.80% 45 13.64% 148 44.85% 1 0.30% 30 9.09% - 0.00% 10 3.03% 96 29.09% - 0.00%

Atlanta, GA GA 49,734 278 0.56% 7 2.52% 33 11.87% 237 85.25% - 0.00% - 0.00% 1 0.36% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Atlantic City, NJ NJ 7,900 50 0.63% - 0.00% 11 22.00% - 0.00% 37 74.00% - 0.00% 2 4.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Austin, TX TX 81,155 639 0.79% 202 31.61% 50 7.82% 381 59.62% 3 0.47% - 0.00% 3 0.47% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Brockton, MA MA 15,884 124 0.78% 60 48.39% 19 15.32% 45 36.29% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Buffalo, NY NY 36,706 832 2.27% 282 33.89% 138 16.59% 321 38.58% - 0.00% - 0.00% 91 10.94% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Calgary, AB (Canada) AB 96,931 16 0.02% - 0.00% - 0.00% 16 100.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Central Falls, RI RI 3,424 64 1.87% 7 10.94% 20 31.25% 12 18.75% 1 1.56% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 24 37.50%

Chicago, IL IL 424,000 3,617 0.85% 2,092 57.84% 436 12.05% 807 22.31% 282 7.80% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Chicago Heights, IL (Flossmoor) IL 2,669 19 0.71% 7 36.84% - 0.00% 12 63.16% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Chicopee, MA MA 7,532 56 0.74% 50 89.29% 2 3.57% 4 7.14% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Cincinnati, OH OH 35,563 394 1.11% 161 40.86% 4 1.02% 200 50.76% - 0.00% 1 0.25% 28 7.11% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Clark County, NV NV 294,271 3,713 1.26% 522 14.06% 8 0.22% 2,638 71.05% 1 0.03% - 0.00% 24 0.65% 366 9.86% 154 4.15%

Denver, CO CO 73,018 500 0.68% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

Detroit, MI MI 131,643 911 0.69% 209 22.94% 573 62.90% 129 14.16% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Evanston, IL IL 6,629 141 2.13% 97 68.79% - 0.00% 34 24.11% 10 7.09% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Everett, MA MA 5,347 38 0.71% 21 55.26% 2 5.26% 15 39.47% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Fitchburg, MA MA 5,682 81 1.43% 62 76.54% - 0.00% 8 9.88% 11 13.58% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Greenville, SC SC 64,992 254 0.39% - 0.00% - 0.00% 216 85.04% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 38 14.96% - 0.00%

Hartford, CT CT 24,435 183 0.75% 137 74.86% 18 9.84% 19 10.38% 4 2.19% 1 0.55% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Houston, TX TX 210,292 562 0.27% 3 0.53% 20 3.56% 533 94.84% - 0.00% - 0.00% 6 1.07% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Indianapolis, IN IN 39,311 647 1.65% 269 41.58% 38 5.87% 208 32.15% - 0.00% - 0.00% 3 0.46% 129 19.94% - 0.00%

Indianapolis, IN (Washington Townsh IN 10,202 180 1.76% 107 59.44% 19 10.56% 32 17.78% - 0.00% - 0.00% 2 1.11% 20 11.11% - 0.00%

Inkster, MI MI 1,500 25 1.67% 9 36.00% 1 4.00% 15 60.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Jersey City, NJ NJ 31,263 224 0.72% 115 51.34% 96 42.86% - 0.00% 12 5.36% - 0.00% - 0.00% 1 0.45% - 0.00%

Kalamazoo, MI MI 10,432 220 2.11% 180 81.82% 40 18.18% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Katy, TX TX 52,800 151 0.29% 21 13.91% - 0.00% 130 86.09% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Itinerant Srvs

Outside Home

Reverse

Mainstream

1

Page 14: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Preschool (ages 3-5) Special Education Enrollment AnalysisDecember 2005

Total Preschool SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

City State Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School School Hospital

Itinerant Srvs

Outside Home

Reverse

Mainstream

Long Beach, CA CA 93,589 868 0.93% - 0.00% - 0.00% 711 81.91% 91 10.48% - 0.00% 1 0.12% - 0.00% 65 7.49%

Los Angeles, CA CA 727,319 5,960 0.82% 3,532 59.26% 1,434 24.06% 784 13.15% 195 3.27% - 0.00% 15 0.25% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Madison, WI WI 24,561 386 1.57% 191 49.48% 26 6.74% 139 36.01% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 30 7.77% - 0.00%

Memphis, TN TN 125,322 892 0.71% 181 20.29% - 0.00% 626 70.18% 7 0.78% - 0.00% 8 0.90% 69 7.74% 1 0.11%

Miami, FL (Miami Dade) FL 358,545 3,027 0.84% 576 19.03% - 0.00% 277 9.15% 11 0.36% - 0.00% 14 0.46% - 0.00% 2,149 70.99%

New Bedford, MA MA 13,352 173 1.30% 171 98.84% 1 0.58% 1 0.58% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Newport, RI RI 2,500 0.00% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Passaic, NJ NJ 13,510 211 1.56% 42 19.91% 110 52.13% 59 27.96% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Pittsburgh, PA PA 34,418 875 2.54% 449 51.31% - 0.00% 84 9.60% 13 1.49% - 0.00% - 0.00% 1 0.11% 33 3.77%

Racine, WI WI 21,393 614 2.87% - 0.00% - 0.00% 483 78.66% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 131 21.34% - 0.00%

Rockland, MD (Montgomery) MD 139,387 1,943 1.39% 121 6.23% 99 5.10% 734 37.78% 100 5.15% - 0.00% 3 0.15% 886 45.60% - 0.00%

Round Rock, TX TX 37,786 220 0.58% 70 31.82% - 0.00% 55 25.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 41 18.64% 54 24.55%

Salem, MA MA 4,774 84 1.76% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

San Antonio, TX (Northside) TX 77,978 1,040 1.33% 764 73.46% 94 9.04% 178 17.12% 1 0.10% - 0.00% 3 0.29% - 0.00% - 0.00%

San Diego, CA CA 134,930 1,512 1.12% 649 42.92% 8 0.53% 639 42.26% - 0.00% - 0.00% 12 0.79% 186 12.30% 18 1.19%

South Bend, IN IN 22,100 604 2.73% 314 51.99% 29 4.80% 24 3.97% 236 39.07% - 0.00% 1 0.17% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Springfield, MA MA 25,810 309 1.20% 295 95.47% - 0.00% 10 3.24% 2 0.65% - 0.00% 2 0.65% - 0.00% - 0.00%

Tampa, FL (Hillsborough) FL 193,631 2,038 1.05% 428 21.00% 3 0.15% 1,245 61.09% 24 1.18% - 0.00% 6 0.29% 332 16.29% - 0.00%

Tempe, AZ (Kyrene) AZ 18,774 276 1.47% - 0.00% - 0.00% 6 2.17% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 29 10.51% 241 87.32%

Waukegan, IL IL 16,253 201 1.24% 46 22.89% - 0.00% 74 36.82% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 80 39.80%

Webster, MA MA 1,984 39 1.97% 19 48.72% 1 2.56% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 19 48.72% - 0.00%

Worcester, MA MA 24,950 340 1.36% 285 83.82% 20 5.88% 8 2.35% 1 0.29% - 0.00% - 0.00% 26 7.65% - 0.00%

Yonkers, NY NY 26,220 395 1.51% 67 16.96% 91 23.04% 98 24.81% 139 35.19% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

St. Thomas, VI VI 16,823 151 0.90% 138 91.39% 3 1.99% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00% 10 6.62% - 0.00% - 0.00%

2

Page 15: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

111999999888 --- 222000000555 CCCOOOMMMPPPAAARRRIIISSSOOONNN OOOFFF KKK---111222 SSSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN EEENNNRRROOOLLLLLLMMMEEENNNTTT DDDAAATTTAAA

Sorted by City

Page 16: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment Analysis1998 - 2005 Comparison

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Year City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

2005 Akron, OH 27,289 4,373 16.02% 1,431 32.72% 1,708 39.06% 1,052 24.06% 142 3.25% 35 0.80% 5 0.11%

2004 Akron, OH 27,501 4,173 15.17% 1,308 31.34% 1,466 35.13% 1,203 28.83% 138 3.31% 55 1.32% 3 0.07%

2002 Akron, OH 29,481 4,188 14.21% 1,465 34.98% 1,056 25.21% 1,431 34.17% 124 2.96% 70 1.67% 42 1.00%

2000 Akron, OH 30,245 3,997 13.22% 1,759 44.01% 1,899 47.51% 257 6.43% 68 1.70% 3 0.08% 11 0.28%

1999 Akron, OH 31,725 3,864 12.18% 1,570 40.63% 1,186 30.69% 992 25.67% 82 2.12% 2 0.05% 32 0.83%

2005 Atlanta, GA 49,734 4,742 9.53% 2,442 51.50% 867 18.28% 1,141 24.06% 8 0.17% - 0.00% 6 0.13%

2004 Atlanta, GA 48,698 4,489 9.22% 1,966 43.80% 933 20.78% 1,528 34.04% 58 1.29% - 0.00% 4 0.09%

1998 Atlanta, GA 58,796 4,903 8.34% 1,462 29.82% 765 15.60% 2,262 46.14% 1 0.02% 66 1.35% 3 0.06%

2005 Austin, TX 81,155 9,382 11.56% 5,125 54.63% 2,758 29.40% 1,367 14.57% 66 0.70% - 0.00% 66 0.70%

2004 Austin, TX 79,950 9,453 11.82% 4,599 48.65% 3,041 32.17% 1,643 17.38% 73 0.77% - 0.00% 97 1.03%

1999 Austin, TX 77,711 9,458 12.17% 1,101 11.64% 4,313 45.60% - 0.00% - 0.00% 666 7.04% 43 0.45%

1998 Austin, TX 77,200 9,416 12.17% 1,010 11.64% 5,358 56.90% 2,836 30.12% 118 1.25% - 0.00% 94 1.00%

2005 Brockton, MA 15,884 2,170 13.66% 1,309 60.32% 254 11.71% 481 22.17% 64 2.95% 60 2.76% 2 0.09%

2004 Brockton, MA 16,684 1,982 11.88% 945 47.68% 581 29.31% 323 16.30% 123 6.21% 9 0.45% 1 0.05%

2003 Brockton, MA 16,576 1,940 11.70% 397 20.46% 1,072 55.26% 320 16.49% 85 4.38% 64 3.30% 2 0.10%

2002 Brockton, MA 16,779 2,042 12.17% 1,266 62.00% 305 14.94% 337 16.50% 116 5.68% 11 0.54% 7 0.34%

2001 Brockton, MA 16,936 2,027 11.97% 1,198 59.10% 332 16.38% 347 17.12% 81 4.00% 66 3.26% 3 0.15%

2000 Brockton, MA 16,882 2,374 14.06% 302 12.72% 1,557 65.59% 377 15.88% 127 5.35% 9 0.38% 2 0.08%

1999 Brockton, MA 16,833 2,541 15.10% 1,674 65.88% 254 10.00% 352 13.85% 139 5.47% 8 0.31% 3 0.12%

2005 Buffalo, NY 36,706 9,423 25.67% 5,276 55.99% 1,215 12.89% 2,164 22.97% 406 4.31% 362 3.84% - 0.00%

2004 Buffalo, NY 38,495 9,289 24.13% 5,120 55.12% 1,281 13.79% 2,116 22.78% 405 4.36% 367 3.95% - 0.00%

2005 Calgary, AB (Canada) 96,931 17,132 17.67% 13,128 76.63% - 0.00% 3,065 17.89% 921 5.38% - 0.00% 18 0.11%

2004 Calgary, AB (Canada) 95,622 17,264 18.05% 13,416 77.71% - 0.00% 2,950 17.09% 831 4.81% 50 0.29% 17 0.10%

2005 Chicago, IL 424,000 50,585 11.93% 20,247 40.03% 14,011 27.70% 13,382 26.45% 2,870 5.67% 75 0.15% - 0.00%

2004 Chicago, IL 482,020 51,860 10.76% 19,052 36.74% 13,912 26.83% 15,505 29.90% 3,290 6.34% 101 0.19% - 0.00%

2001 Chicago, IL 348,079 53,020 15.23% 19,281 36.37% 13,530 25.52% 16,600 31.31% 3,550 6.70% 37 0.07% 31 0.06%

2000 Chicago, IL 445,344 52,021 11.68% 18,888 36.31% 13,352 25.67% 15,884 30.53% 3,719 7.15% 178 0.34% -

1999 Chicago, IL 432,000 52,741 12.21% 19,841 37.62% 12,668 24.02% 16,387 31.07% 3,845 7.29% 16 0.03% -

1998 Chicago, IL 445,503 54,140 12.15% 7,317 13.51% 21,548 39.80% 19,238 35.53% 4,459 8.24% 59 0.11% 1,519 2.81%

2005 Chicago Heights, IL (Flossmoor) 2,669 269 10.08% 175 65.06% 30 11.15% 62 23.05% 2 0.74% - 0.00% - 0.00%

2002 Chicago Heights, IL (Flossmoor) 2,642 259 9.80% 148 57.14% 47 18.15% 34 13.13% 28 10.81% 2 0.77% - 0.00%

2001 Chicago Heights, IL (Flossmoor) 2,589 320 12.36% 178 55.63% 100 31.25% 17 5.31% 23 7.19% 1 0.31% 1 0.31%

1

Page 17: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment Analysis1998 - 2005 Comparison

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Year City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

2005 Chicopee, MA 7,532 1,048 13.91% 443 42.27% 182 17.37% 373 35.59% 33 3.15% 13 1.24% 4 0.38%

2004 Chicopee, MA 4,643 1,093 23.54% 438 40.07% 242 22.14% 352 32.20% 50 4.57% 7 0.64% 4 0.37%

2003 Chicopee, MA 7,273 1,032 14.19% 393 38.08% 262 25.39% 297 28.78% 62 6.01% 12 1.16% 6 0.58%

2001 Chicopee, MA 7,923 1,065 13.44% 774 72.68% - 189 17.75% 96 9.01% 6 0.56% -

2000 Chicopee, MA 7,895 1,207 15.29% 483 40.02% 298 24.69% 199 16.49% 129 10.69% 14 1.16% 8 0.66%

1999 Chicopee, MA 7,895 1,372 17.38% 309 22.52% 443 32.29% 386 28.13% 108 7.87% 17 1.24% N/A

2005 Cincinnati, OH 35,563 6,753 18.99% 2,891 42.81% 1,757 26.02% 1,413 20.92% 503 7.45% 71 1.05% 118 1.75%

2004 Cincinnati, OH 36,818 7,249 19.69% 2,835 39.11% 2,189 30.20% 1,546 21.33% 489 6.75% 56 0.77% 134 1.85%

2003 Cincinnati, OH 39,304 6,609 16.82% 2,181 33.00% 2,218 33.56% 1,631 24.68% 471 7.13% 7 0.11% 101 1.53%

2002 Cincinnati, OH 41,656 7,032 16.88% 2,184 31.06% 2,487 35.37% 1,956 27.82% 314 4.47% 7 0.10% 84 1.19%

2000 Cincinnati, OH 43,788 6,827 15.59% 2,119 31.04% 1,975 28.93% 2,119 31.04% 109 1.60% 12 0.18% 74 1.08%

2005 Clark County, NV 294,271 28,208 9.59% 14,150 50.16% 9,334 33.09% 4,163 14.76% 482 1.71% - 0.00% 79 0.28%

2004 Clark County, NV 280,834 27,558 9.81% 12,875 46.72% 10,053 36.48% 4,041 14.66% 497 1.80% - 0.00% 92 0.33%

2003 Clark County, NV 268,111 26,338 9.82% 11,362 43.14% 10,551 40.06% 3,833 14.55% 507 1.92% - 85 0.32%

2002 Clark County, NV 254,471 24,491 9.62% 10,307 42.08% 9,965 40.69% 3,500 14.29% 508 2.07% - 211 0.86%

2001 Clark County, NV 244,628 23,075 9.43% 9,668 41.90% 9,449 40.95% 3,195 13.85% 528 2.29% 1 0.00% 214 0.93%

2000 Clark County, NV 231,347 22,529 9.74% 9,557 42.42% 9,359 41.54% 3,026 13.43% 514 2.28% 1 0.00% 72 0.32%

1999 Clark County, NV 217,139 22,569 10.39% 8,756 38.80% 7,651 33.90% 5,385 23.86% 553 2.45% - 224 0.99%

1998 Clark County, NV 203,777 20,573 10.10% 7,373 35.84% 8,052 39.14% 4,532 22.03% 560 2.72% - 56 0.27%

2005 Denver, CO 73,018 8,871 12.15% 5,876 66.24% 1,413 15.93% 1,029 11.60% 494 5.57% - 0.00% 59 0.67%

2003 Denver, CO 71,617 8,522 11.90% 6,195 72.69% 1,564 18.35% 279 3.27% 297 3.49% 152 1.78% 35 0.41%

1999 Denver, CO 71,205 7,934 11.14% 4,254 53.62% 1,746 22.01% 1,150 14.49% 125 1.58% 214 2.70% 57 0.72%

1998 Denver, CO 69,577 8,152 11.14% 4,275 53.62% 1,937 23.76% 1,126 13.81% 160 1.96% 171 2.10% 71 0.87%

2005 Detroit, MI 131,643 19,124 14.53% 5,318 27.81% 1,998 10.45% 9,983 52.20% 1,824 9.54% - 0.00% - 0.00%

1999 Detroit, MI 167,455 13,032 7.78% 606 4.65% 2,124 16.30% 8,577 65.81% 1,593 12.22% - 0.00% 132 1.01%

2005 Evanston, IL 6,629 1,024 15.45% 603 58.89% 197 19.24% 169 16.50% 25 2.44% 30 2.93% - 0.00%

2004 Evanston, IL 6,721 1,142 16.99% 676 59.19% 202 17.69% 186 16.29% 52 4.55% 26 2.28% - 0.00%

2005 Fitchburg, MA 5,682 1,078 18.97% 776 71.99% - 0.00% 220 20.41% 79 7.33% 2 0.19% 1 0.09%

2003 Fitchburg, MA 5,865 905 15.43% 232 25.64% 385 42.54% 218 24.09% 60 6.63% 8 0.88% 2 0.22%

2000 Fitchburg, MA 6,362 943 14.82% 36 3.82% 586 62.14% 188 19.94% 40 4.24% 18 1.91% 4 0.42%

2005 Greenville, SC 64,992 11,059 17.02% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%

2004 Greenville, SC 63,964 10,146 15.86% 5,055 49.82% 2,294 22.61% 2,385 23.51% 218 2.15% 1 0.01% 193 1.90%

2002 Greenville, SC 60,782 9,609 15.81% 2,344 24.39% 4,255 44.28% 2,714 28.24% 180 1.87% 5 0.05% 111 1.16%

2001 Greenville, SC 59,946 10,197 17.01% 2,784 27.30% 4,157 40.77% 2,978 29.20% 223 2.19% 6 0.06% 49 0.48%

2000 Greenville, SC 59,763 9,144 15.30% 2,283 24.97% 3,836 41.95% 2,796 30.58% 185 2.02% 7 0.08% 37 0.40%

2

Page 18: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment Analysis1998 - 2005 Comparison

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Year City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

2005 Houston, TX 210,292 16,839 8.01% 6,284 37.32% 6,810 40.44% 3,414 20.27% 195 1.16% 19 0.11% 117 0.69%

2003 Houston, TX 211,499 17,266 8.16% 6,825 39.53% 6,563 38.01% 3,437 19.91% 173 1.00% 47 0.27% 221 1.28%

2002 Houston, TX 212,018 17,255 8.14% 6,618 38.35% 6,647 38.52% 3,450 19.99% 217 1.26% 50 0.29% 273 1.58%

2001 Houston, TX 215,000 17,485 8.13% 6,929 39.63% 6,659 38.08% 3,473 19.86% 132 0.75% 39 0.22% 253 1.45%

2000 Houston, TX 210,000 18,358 8.74% 3,549 19.33% 9,403 51.22% 4,806 26.18% - 9 0.05% 255 1.39%

1998 Houston, TX 208,621 21,069 10.10% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

2005 Indianapolis, IN 39,311 6,435 16.37% 3,565 55.40% 1,217 18.91% 1,357 21.09% 21 0.33% 137 2.13% 138 2.14%

2001 Indianapolis, IN 41,087 6,790 16.53% 3,490 51.40% 995 14.65% 2,117 31.18% 14 0.21% 109 1.61% 65 0.96%

2000 Indianapolis, IN 24,734 2,488 10.06% 523 21.02% 997 40.07% 449 18.05% 6 0.24% 5 0.20% 8 0.32%

2005 Indianapolis, IN (Washington Township) 10,202 1,337 13.11% 914 68.36% 295 22.06% 116 8.68% 6 0.45% - 0.00% 6 0.45%

2004 Indianapolis, IN (Washington Township) 10,100 1,254 12.42% 855 68.18% 273 21.77% 104 8.29% 2 0.16% 20 1.59% - 0.00%

2002 Indianapolis, IN (Washington Township) 10,500 1,325 12.62% 947 71.47% 231 17.43% 119 8.98% 5 0.38% 19 1.43% 4 0.30%

2005 Jersey City, NJ 31,263 4,110 13.15% 1,368 33.28% 1,358 33.04% 1,155 28.10% 215 5.23% 1 0.02% 13 0.32%

2004 Jersey City, NJ 31,063 3,855 12.41% 1,270 32.94% 1,196 31.02% 1,282 33.26% 94 2.44% 1 0.03% 12 0.31%

2003 Jersey City, NJ 30,646 4,089 13.34% 1,120 27.39% 1,347 32.94% 1,372 33.55% 222 5.43% 8 0.20% 9 0.22%

2002 Jersey City, NJ 31,284 4,839 15.47% 1,010 20.87% 1,432 29.59% 2,133 44.08% 225 4.65% 23 0.48% 16 0.33%

2001 Jersey City, NJ 31,251 5,301 16.96% 774 14.60% 1,188 22.41% 2,934 55.35% 360 6.79% 1 0.02% 44 0.83%

2000 Jersey City, NJ 31,323 5,469 17.46% 768 14.04% 1,244 22.75% 3,071 56.15% 348 6.36% 1 0.02% 37 0.68%

1999 Jersey City, NJ 31,574 4,467 14.15% 567 12.69% 753 16.86% 2,819 63.11% 309 6.92% 1 0.02% 18 0.40%

1998 Jersey City, NJ 32,525 4,356 13.39% 597 13.71% 558 12.81% 2,486 57.07% 467 10.72% 1 0.02% 18 0.41%

2005 Kalamazoo, MI 10,962 1,498 13.67% 703 46.93% 692 46.19% 10 0.67% 91 6.07% - 2 0.13%

2004 Kalamazoo, MI 10,419 1,343 12.89% 477 35.52% 523 38.94% 243 18.09% 100 7.45% - 0.00% 0.00%

2003 Kalamazoo, MI 10,962 1,498 13.67% 703 46.93% 692 46.19% 10 0.67% 91 6.07% - 2 0.13%

2002 Kalamazoo, MI 11,188 1,565 13.99% 591 37.76% 870 55.59% 15 0.96% 89 5.69% - -

2001 Kalamazoo, MI 11,200 1,295 11.56% 495 38.22% 722 55.75% 24 1.85% 21 1.62% 32 2.47% 1 0.08%

2000 Kalamazoo, MI 11,245 1,473 13.10% 1,259 85.47% 90 6.11% 25 1.70% 99 6.72% - -

2005 Long Beach, CA 95,302 6,813 7.15% 3,517 51.62% 490 7.19% 2,549 37.41% 120 1.76% 115 1.69% 22 0.32%

2004 Long Beach, CA 95,302 6,813 7.15% 3,517 51.62% 490 7.19% 2,549 37.41% 120 1.76% 115 1.69% 22 0.32%

2000 Long Beach, CA 95,590 6,527 6.83% 3,156 48.35% 1,450 22.22% 1,808 27.70% 11 0.17% 93 1.42% 9 0.14%

1999 Long Beach, CA 91,723 6,663 7.26% 1,776 26.65% 2,508 37.64% 2,160 32.42% - 156 2.34% 31 0.47%

2005 Los Angeles, CA 727,319 77,722 10.69% 37,095 47.73% 11,719 15.08% 21,672 27.88% 6,491 8.35% 606 0.78% 139 0.18%

2004 Los Angeles, CA 741,201 77,478 10.45% 31,356 40.47% 13,784 17.79% 24,625 31.78% 7,380 9.53% 170 0.22% 163 0.21%

2003 Los Angeles, CA 743,087 79,383 10.68% 30,859 38.87% 13,134 16.55% 27,796 35.02% 7,191 9.06% 82 0.10% 321 0.40%

2002 Los Angeles, CA 746,831 80,174 10.74% 11,278 14.07% 31,544 39.34% 29,383 36.65% 7,769 9.69% - 200 0.25%

2001 Los Angeles, CA 736,675 80,083 10.87% 12,394 15.48% 31,073 38.80% 28,772 35.93% 7,558 9.44% - 286 0.36%

2000 Los Angeles, CA 722,727 74,033 10.24% 10,827 14.62% 29,667 40.07% 27,385 36.99% 5,899 7.97% - 255 0.34%

1998 Los Angeles, CA 697,143 78,983 11.33% 16,757 21.22% 29,447 37.28% 25,178 31.88% 4,473 5.66% 807 1.02% 121 0.15%

3

Page 19: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment Analysis1998 - 2005 Comparison

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Year City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

2005 Madison, WI 24,561 4,127 16.80% 2,804 67.94% 767 18.58% 551 13.35% - 0.00% 5 0.12% - 0.00%

2001 Madison, WI 24,995 4,208 16.84% 4,171 99.12% - - 10 0.24% 27 0.64% -

2000 Madison, WI 25,160 4,080 16.22% 4,026 98.68% - - 9 0.22% 45 1.10% -

1999 Madison, WI 24,998 4,142 16.57% 3,926 94.79% 20 0.48% 162 3.91% 6 0.14% 23 0.56% 5 0.12%

2005 Memphis, TN 125,322 13,443 10.73% 5,914 43.99% 4,502 33.49% 2,856 21.25% 89 0.66% 21 0.16% 61 0.45%

2004 Memphis, TN 123,998 13,162 10.61% 5,422 41.19% 5,052 38.38% 2,444 18.57% 187 1.42% 20 0.15% 37 0.28%

2002 Memphis, TN 116,648 12,212 10.47% 4,463 36.55% 3,884 31.80% 3,680 30.13% 69 0.57% 15 0.12% 101 0.83%

2001 Memphis, TN 118,000 11,738 9.95% 4,487 38.23% 3,683 31.38% 3,250 27.69% 173 1.47% 16 0.14% 129 1.10%

2000 Memphis, TN 119,000 13,669 11.49% 5,151 37.68% 3,649 26.70% 3,066 22.43% - 10 0.07% -

1998 Memphis, TN 112,064 12,555 11.20% 3,772 30.04% 4,420 35.21% 3,738 29.77% 222 1.77% 5 0.04% 398 3.17%

2005 Miami, FL (Miami-Dade County) 358,545 39,769 11.09% 16,057 40.38% 11,323 28.47% 11,786 29.64% 120 0.30% 25 0.06% 458 1.15%

2004 Miami, FL (Miami-Dade County) 365,456 39,548 10.82% 14,348 36.28% 12,000 30.34% 13,200 33.38% - 0.00% - 0.00% - 0.00%

2003 Miami, FL (Miami-Dade County) 338,417 43,339 12.81% 11,268 26.00% 14,735 34.00% 16,469 38.00% 520 1.20% 43 0.10% 217 0.50%

2002 Miami, FL (Miami-Dade County) 371,483 39,836 10.72% 7,926 19.90% 16,714 41.96% 14,510 36.42% 191 0.48% 16 0.04% 479 1.20%

2001 Miami, FL (Miami-Dade County) 370,000 38,640 10.44% 7,856 20.33% 15,760 40.79% 14,428 37.34% 167 0.43% 29 0.08% 400 1.04%

2000 Miami, FL (Miami-Dade County) 368,285 38,367 10.42% 8,065 21.02% N/A N/A 140 0.36% 23 0.06% 387 1.01%

1998 Miami, FL (Miami-Dade County) 345,861 37,589 10.87% N/A N/A N/A 612 1.63% 46 0.12% 258 0.69%

2005 New Bedford, MA 13,352 2,447 18.33% 1,470 60.07% 565 23.09% 284 11.61% 122 4.99% 4 0.16% 2 0.08%

2004 New Bedford, MA 14,334 2,434 16.98% 1,346 55.30% 366 15.04% 558 22.93% 159 6.53% 5 0.21% - 0.00%

2003 New Bedford, MA 14,665 2,409 16.43% 529 21.96% 1,096 45.50% 580 24.08% 187 7.76% 13 0.54% 4 0.17%

2002 New Bedford, MA 15,052 2,324 15.44% 1,258 54.13% 368 15.83% 513 22.07% 171 7.36% 9 0.39% 5 0.22%

2001 New Bedford, MA 15,043 2,350 15.62% 435 18.51% 1,273 54.17% 535 22.77% 88 3.74% 13 0.55% 6 0.26%

2000 New Bedford, MA 14,605 2,556 17.50% 428 16.74% 1,284 50.23% 457 17.88% 71 2.78% 10 0.39% 6 0.23%

1999 New Bedford, MA 14,490 2,330 16.08% 356 15.28% 1,351 57.98% 441 18.93% 141 6.05% 12 0.52% 29 1.24%

1998 New Bedford, MA 14,683 2,351 16.01% 286 12.17% 1,158 49.26% 562 23.90% 52 2.21% 14 0.60% 9 0.38%

2005 Newport, RI 2,500 634 25.36% 463 73.00% 139 22.00% - 0.00% 13 2.00% 8 1.28% - 0.00%

2003 Newport, RI 2,799 657 23.47% 403 61.34% 79 12.02% 118 17.96% 43 6.54% 6 0.91% 8 1.22%

2005 Philadelphia, PA 228,903 35,063 15.32% 15,707 44.80% 11,798 33.65% 7,514 21.43% 17 0.05% 10 0.03% 17 0.05%

2004 Philadelphia, PA 217,405 26,797 12.33% 6,973 26.02% 10,654 39.76% 8,139 30.37% 972 3.63% 38 0.14% 21 0.08%

2003 Philadelphia, PA 211,845 25,756 12.16% 6,930 26.91% 8,657 33.61% 9,273 36.00% 711 2.76% 157 0.61% 28 0.11%

2000 Philadelphia, PA 200,860 23,073 11.49% 5,701 24.71% 3,460 15.00% 12,907 55.94% 1,000 4.33% 5 0.02% 19 0.08%

4

Page 20: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment Analysis1998 - 2005 Comparison

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Year City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

2005 Pittsburgh, PA 34,418 8,722 25.34% 4,397 50.41% 3,459 39.66% 465 5.33% 686 7.87% 1 0.01% - 0.00%

2004 Pittsburgh, PA 33,905 6,613 19.50% 3,291 49.77% 1,785 26.99% 615 9.30% 922 13.94% - 0.00% - 0.00%

2003 Pittsburgh, PA 38,500 6,896 17.91% 2,341 33.95% 2,765 40.10% 883 12.80% 903 13.09% - 4 0.06%

2002 Pittsburgh, PA 36,000 6,757 18.77% 2,222 32.88% 3,690 54.61% 9 0.13% 809 11.97% 25 0.37% 2 0.03%

2001 Pittsburgh, PA 39,100 6,233 15.94% 2,352 37.73% 2,617 41.99% 498 7.99% 764 12.26% - 2 0.03%

2000 Pittsburgh, PA 38,846 6,437 16.57% 3,873 60.17% 1,633 25.37% 419 6.51% 504 7.83% - -

1999 Pittsburgh, PA 39,603 6,228 15.73% 2,682 43.06% 2,225 35.73% 317 5.09% 1,000 16.06% - 4 0.06%

2005 Portland, OR 45,563 6,576 14.43% 4,759 72.37% 739 11.24% 843 12.82% 206 3.13% 10 0.15% 19 0.29%

2003 Portland, OR 48,029 6,330 13.18% 4,218 66.64% 548 8.66% 1,201 18.97% 229 3.62% 117 1.85% 17 0.27%

2002 Portland, OR 52,969 6,585 12.43% 3,859 58.60% 720 10.93% 1,550 23.54% 407 6.18% 25 0.38% 24 0.36%

2005 Racine, WI 21,393 3,225 15.08% 1,240 38.45% 1,425 44.19% 553 17.15% - 0.00% 6 0.19% 1 0.03%

2004 Racine, WI 21,219 3,225 15.20% 1,082 33.55% 1,516 47.01% 622 19.29% - 0.00% 3 0.09% 2 0.06%

2005 Rockville, MD (Montgomery) 139,387 15,757 11.30% 8,990 57.05% 2,452 15.56% 3,256 20.66% 1,016 6.45% 19 0.12% 24 0.15%

2004 Rockville, MD (Montgomery) 139,337 15,768 11.32% 8,421 53.41% 2,800 17.76% 3,392 21.51% 1,108 7.03% 16 0.10% 31 0.20%

2002 Rockville, MD (Montgomery) 138,891 15,329 11.04% 6,709 43.77% 2,847 18.57% 4,629 30.20% 1,038 6.77% 79 0.52% 27 0.18%

2001 Rockville, MD (Montgomery) 136,832 14,902 10.89% 5,835 39.16% 3,101 20.81% 4,794 32.17% 1,062 7.13% 75 0.50% 35 0.23%

2000 Rockville, MD (Montgomery) 134,308 15,537 11.57% 5,642 36.31% 3,155 20.31% 4,933 31.75% 1,106 7.12% 81 0.52% 56 0.36%

1999 Rockville, MD (Montgomery) 130,180 16,227 12.47% 6,597 40.65% 2,930 18.06% 5,429 33.46% 872 5.37% 90 0.55% 16 0.10%

2005 Salem, MA 4,774 910 19.06% 384 42.20% 222 24.40% 163 17.91% 129 14.18% 11 1.21% 1 0.11%

2003 Salem, MA 4,967 836 16.83% 266 31.82% 315 37.68% 165 19.74% 84 10.05% 6 0.72% -

2005 San Antonio, TX (Northside) 77,978 9,956 12.77% 6,832 68.62% 1,657 16.64% 1,201 12.06% 171 1.72% 58 0.58% 37 0.37%

2004 San Antonio, TX (Northside) 74,649 10,046 13.46% 5,608 55.82% 2,984 29.70% 1,192 11.87% 143 1.42% 43 0.43% 76 0.76%

2003 San Antonio, TX (Northside) 71,798 10,669 14.86% 5,342 50.07% 1,637 15.34% 1,287 12.06% 160 1.50% 47 0.44% 86 0.81%

2002 San Antonio, TX (Northside) 70,010 8,516 12.16% 3,056 35.89% 3,488 40.96% 1,716 20.15% 180 2.11% - 76 0.89%

2001 San Antonio, TX (Northside) 66,000 9,655 14.63% 6,478 67.09% 1,727 17.89% 1,063 11.01% 293 3.03% 34 0.35% 60 0.62%

2000 San Antonio, TX (Northside) 63,917 9,152 14.32% 4,635 50.64% 1,125 12.29% 1,849 20.20% 269 2.94% - 54 0.59%

1999 San Antonio, TX (Northside) 62,439 9,644 15.45% 5,019 52.04% 2,255 23.38% 2,000 20.74% 269 2.79% 1 0.01% 100 1.04%

1998 San Antonio, TX (Northside) 61,000 9,385 15.39% 3,529 37.60% 2,113 22.51% 1,601 17.06% 264 2.81% 1 0.01% 88 0.94%

2005 San Diego, CA 134,930 14,265 10.57% 10,689 74.93% 629 4.41% 2,271 15.92% 629 4.41% 12 0.08% 35 0.25%

2004 San Diego, CA 136,347 15,140 11.10% 9,143 60.39% 1,399 9.24% 3,901 25.77% 633 4.18% 35 0.23% 29 0.19%

2002 San Diego, CA 141,463 15,946 11.27% 3,738 23.44% 6,546 41.05% 4,937 30.96% 604 3.79% 93 0.58% 28 0.18%

2000 San Diego, CA 140,656 14,503 10.31% 3,278 22.60% 5,959 41.09% 4,501 31.03% 678 4.67% 39 0.27% 48 0.33%

1999 San Diego, CA 136,778 14,947 10.93% 3,268 21.86% 5,762 38.55% 5,149 34.45% 664 4.44% 23 0.15% 81 0.54%

1998 San Diego, CA 138,356 14,033 10.14% 8,417 59.98% 1,449 10.33% 3,578 25.50% 120 0.86% - 43 0.31%

5

Page 21: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

K-12 Special Education Enrollment Analysis1998 - 2005 Comparison

Total K-12 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Year City Enrollment Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

2005 South Bend, IN 22,100 4,014 18.16% 1,441 35.90% 944 23.52% 1,581 39.39% 4 0.10% 35 0.87% 9 0.22%

2004 South Bend, IN 22,140 4,446 20.08% 2,118 47.64% 946 21.28% 1,276 28.70% 27 0.61% 64 1.44% 15 0.34%

2003 South Bend, IN 21,981 4,419 20.10% 2,040 46.16% 1,007 22.79% 1,250 28.29% 34 0.77% 75 1.70% 13 0.29%

2002 South Bend, IN 21,059 4,542 21.57% 2,425 53.39% 1,170 25.76% 880 19.37% 31 0.68% 28 0.62% 8 0.18%

2001 South Bend, IN 21,362 4,487 21.00% 2,427 54.09% 927 20.66% 1,021 22.75% 12 0.27% 86 1.92% 14 0.31%

1999 South Bend, IN 27,395 5,320 19.42% 2,105 39.57% 558 10.49% 1,579 29.68% - 11 0.21% 60 1.13%

1998 South Bend, IN 20,950 3,730 17.80% 1,940 52.01% 588 15.76% 1,465 39.28% - 18 0.48% 5 0.13%

2005 Springfield, MA 25,810 5,256 20.36% 1,255 23.88% 1,852 35.24% 1,722 32.76% 398 7.57% 17 0.32% 12 0.23%

2004 Springfield, MA 26,111 5,092 19.50% 1,045 20.52% 1,879 36.90% 1,745 34.27% 384 7.54% 26 0.51% 13 0.26%

2003 Springfield, MA 26,566 4,896 18.43% 782 15.97% 2,009 41.03% 1,672 34.15% 387 7.90% 40 0.82% 6 0.12%

2002 Springfield, MA 27,124 4,814 17.75% 1,756 36.48% 1,295 26.90% 1,446 30.04% 287 5.96% 24 0.50% 6 0.12%

2001 Springfield, MA 26,774 4,573 17.08% 674 14.74% 1,153 25.21% 1,137 24.86% 1,202 26.28% 407 8.90% -

2000 Springfield, MA 26,503 5,236 19.76% 849 16.21% 1,438 27.46% 1,170 22.35% 1,419 27.10% 338 6.46% 22 0.42%

1999 Springfield, MA 25,918 5,658 21.83% 2,388 42.21% 1,082 19.12% 1,287 22.75% 357 6.31% 19 0.34% 97 1.71%

1998 Springfield, MA 25,582 5,181 20.25% 860 16.60% 2,245 43.33% 1,205 23.26% 292 5.64% 21 0.41% 116 2.24%

2005 Tempe, AZ (Kyrene) 18,774 1,721 9.17% 952 55.32% 576 33.47% 183 10.63% 8 0.46% - 0.00% 2 0.12%

2004 Tempe, AZ (Kyrene) 18,840 1,494 7.93% 719 48.13% 568 38.02% 193 12.92% 13 0.87% - 0.00% 1 0.07%

2005 Webster, MA 1,984 308 15.52% 218 70.78% 31 10.06% 26 8.44% 29 9.42% 4 1.30% - 0.00%

2004 Webster, MA 1,960 307 15.66% 202 65.80% 38 12.38% 29 9.45% 35 11.40% 3 0.98% - 0.00%

2003 Webster, MA 1,965 335 17.05% 219 65.37% 49 14.63% 32 9.55% 32 9.55% 3 0.90% -

2002 Webster, MA 1,945 323 16.61% 210 65.02% 31 9.60% 47 14.55% 31 9.60% 4 1.24% -

2005 Worcester, MA 24,950 4,425 17.74% 1,737 39.25% 1,222 27.62% 1,064 24.05% 364 8.23% 35 0.79% 3 0.07%

2004 Worcester, MA 25,500 4,725 18.53% 1,649 34.90% 1,570 33.23% 1,062 22.48% 408 8.63% 35 0.74% 5 0.11%

2003 Worcester, MA 25,449 4,144 16.28% 610 14.72% 2,447 59.05% 761 18.36% 277 6.68% 45 1.09% 4 0.10%

2002 Worcester, MA 26,247 4,219 16.07% 2,401 56.91% 780 18.49% 720 17.07% 203 4.81% 100 2.37% 15 0.36%

2001 Worcester, MA 25,893 3,832 14.80% 2,058 53.71% 758 19.78% 665 17.35% 233 6.08% 116 3.03% 2 0.05%

2000 Worcester, MA 25,828 3,543 13.72% 508 14.34% 2,089 58.96% 621 17.53% 264 7.45% 19 0.54% 42 1.19%

1999 Worcester, MA 25,518 4,057 15.90% 2,012 49.59% 686 16.91% 683 16.84% 341 8.41% 23 0.57% 44 1.08%

1998 Worcester, MA 25,412 4,479 17.63% 2,577 57.54% 588 13.13% 887 19.80% 85 1.90% 20 0.45% 35 0.78%

2005 Yonkers, NY 26,220 3,630 13.84% 1,632 44.96% 38 1.05% 1,706 47.00% 221 6.09% 21 0.58% 12 0.33%

2004 Yonkers, NY 25,546 3,498 13.69% 1,560 44.60% 21 0.60% 1,681 48.06% 216 6.17% 16 0.46% 4 0.11%

2002 Yonkers, NY 26,432 3,434 12.99% 1,033 30.08% 717 20.88% 1,391 40.51% 243 7.08% 18 0.52% 32 0.93%

2001 Yonkers, NY 26,542 3,505 13.21% 1,017 29.02% 623 17.77% 1,572 44.85% 243 6.93% 18 0.51% 32 0.91%

2000 Yonkers, NY 25,598 3,675 14.36% 865 23.54% 334 9.09% 2,181 59.35% 221 6.01% 10 0.27% 64 1.74%

1999 Yonkers, NY 25,935 3,865 14.90% 1,069 27.66% N/A 1,971 51.00% 473 12.24% 9 0.23% 87 2.25%

6

Page 22: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

222000000444––– 222000000555 AAAGGGEEESSS 666–––222111

SSSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN EEENNNRRROOOLLLLLLMMMEEENNNTTT DDDAAATTTAAA

Sorted by State

Source: Special Education Enrollment data from IDEA

http://www.ideadata.org

Page 23: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Ages 6 - 21 Special Education Enrollment Analysis2004-2005

6-21 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility Hospital

Alabama 84,417 56,600 67.05% 19,896 23.57% 5,584 6.61% 1,170 1.39% 883 1.05% 284 0.34%

Alaska 15,915 8,806 55.33% 4,654 29.24% 2,158 13.56% 234 1.47% 33 0.21% 30 0.19%

Arizona 110,442 55,774 50.50% 32,828 29.72% 19,003 17.21% 2,442 2.21% 127 0.11% 268 0.24%

Arkansas 57,028 27,561 48.33% 21,079 36.96% 6,907 12.11% 718 1.26% 535 0.94% 228 0.40%

California 609,665 307,289 50.40% 128,663 21.10% 147,369 24.17% 19,793 3.25% 3,946 0.65% 2,605 0.43%

Colorado 72,958 51,092 70.03% 12,507 17.14% 6,169 8.46% 1,530 2.10% 1,148 1.57% 512 0.70%

Connecticut 64,087 41,792 65.21% 13,075 20.40% 4,909 7.66% 3,266 5.10% 934 1.46% 111 0.17%

Delaware 16,784 8,350 49.75% 4,226 25.18% 3,383 20.16% 676 4.03% 124 0.74%

District of Columbia 11,578 2,652 22.91% 3,815 32.95% 2,096 18.10% 2,825 24.40%

Florida 364,566 198,750 54.52% 70,585 19.36% 84,469 23.17% 7,139 1.96% 939 0.26% 2,684 0.74%

Georgia 176,868 95,592 54.05% 43,774 24.75% 34,209 19.34% 1,668 0.94% 1,318 0.75% 307 0.17%

Hawaii 19,540 4,463 22.84% 8,019 41.04% 6,555 33.55% 320 1.64% 105 0.54% 78 0.40%

Idaho 24,978 15,933 63.79% 6,655 26.64% 2,001 8.01% 247 0.99% 72 0.29% 70 0.28%

Illinois 287,990 142,163 49.36% 74,446 25.85% 54,534 18.94% 15,658 5.44% 785 0.27% 404 0.14%

Indiana 158,598 97,877 61.71% 33,961 21.41% 22,604 14.25% 1,402 0.88% 1,786 1.13%

Iowa 66,339 32,681 49.26% 23,686 35.70% 7,213 10.87% 1,926 2.90% 737 1.11% 96 0.14%

Kansas 56,328 33,513 59.50% 16,678 29.61% 4,692 8.33% 1,037 1.84% 283 0.50% 125 0.22%

Kentucky 87,481 56,280 64.33% 19,588 22.39% 9,716 11.11% 739 0.84% 449 0.51% 709 0.81%

Louisiana 79,856 46,688 58.47% 18,544 23.22% 13,067 16.36% 684 0.86% 208 0.26% 603 0.76%

Maine 32,174 18,376 57.11% 9,069 28.19% 3,593 11.17% 830 2.58% 183 0.57% 123 0.38%

State

Special Education Enrollment Data from IDEA - http://www.ideadata.org 1

Page 24: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Ages 6 - 21 Special Education Enrollment Analysis2004-2005

6-21 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility HospitalState

Maryland 98,811 58,953 59.66% 15,441 15.63% 16,630 16.83% 7,146 7.23% 308 0.31% 333 0.34%

Massachusetts 147,459 72,654 49.27% 41,945 28.45% 23,006 15.60% 8,252 5.60% 1,425 0.97% 177 0.12%

Michigan 219,317 118,455 54.01% 50,334 22.95% 39,182 17.87% 9,981 4.55% 1,064 0.49% 301 0.14%

Minnesota 103,109 62,277 60.40% 25,701 24.93% 10,248 9.94% 4,086 3.96% 561 0.54% 236 0.23%

Mississippi 59,780 32,728 54.75% 13,060 21.85% 12,803 21.42% 698 1.17% 291 0.49% 200 0.33%

Missouri 127,936 73,430 57.40% 35,439 27.70% 14,373 11.23% 4,029 3.15% 0.00% 658 0.51%

Montana 17,334 8,785 50.68% 6,269 36.17% 1,928 11.12% 107 0.62% 216 1.25% 29 0.17%

Nebraska 40,574 27,449 67.65% 7,977 19.66% 2,943 7.25% 1,842 4.54% 168 0.41% 195 0.48%

Nevada 42,302 23,972 56.67% 11,703 27.67% 5,870 13.88% 652 1.54% 98 0.23%

New Hampshire 28,880 22,024 76.26% 4,670 16.17% 932 3.23% 782 2.71% 426 1.48% 46 0.16%

New Jersey 230,056 105,932 46.05% 64,305 27.95% 38,367 16.68% 19,777 8.60% 526 0.23% 1,149 0.50%

New Mexico 43,881 21,817 49.72% 12,691 28.92% 8,451 19.26% 299 0.68% 335 0.76% 269 0.61%

New York 389,125 212,129 54.51% 50,808 13.06% 99,283 25.51% 20,444 5.25% 4,452 1.14% 2,009 0.52%

North Carolina 172,277 106,050 61.56% 33,320 19.34% 28,985 16.82% 2,198 1.28% 680 0.39% 1,044 0.61%

North Dakota 12,363 9,720 78.62% 1,892 15.30% 487 3.94% 116 0.94% 135 1.09% 13 0.11%

Ohio 243,745 122,025 50.06% 73,939 30.33% 36,225 14.86% 7,665 3.14% 2,213 0.91% 1,678 0.69%

Oklahoma 88,452 43,580 49.27% 34,658 39.18% 8,584 9.70% 682 0.77% 485 0.55% 463 0.52%

Oregon 71,517 50,487 70.59% 11,352 15.87% 8,103 11.33% 1,026 1.43% 375 0.52% 174 0.24%

Pennsylvania 262,769 122,230 46.52% 90,990 34.63% 37,883 14.42% 9,393 3.57% 1,786 0.68% 487 0.19%

Rhode Island 27,866 17,917 64.30% 3,606 12.94% 5,091 18.27% 867 3.11% 231 0.83% 85 0.31%

Special Education Enrollment Data from IDEA - http://www.ideadata.org 2

Page 25: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Ages 6 - 21 Special Education Enrollment Analysis2004-2005

6-21 SPED Full Inclusion Partial Inclusion Substantially Separate Separate Day Residential Home or

Enrollment (less than 21%) (21-60%) (more than 60%) School Facility HospitalState

South Carolina 98,616 50,602 51.31% 23,671 24.00% 22,051 22.36% 786 0.80% 468 0.47% 1,038 1.05%

South Dakota 14,884 9,638 64.75% 3,709 24.92% 976 6.56% 264 1.77% 267 1.79% 30 0.20%

Tennessee 108,114 57,818 53.48% 32,370 29.94% 15,879 14.69% 966 0.89% 257 0.24% 824 0.76%

Texas 467,169 261,545 55.99% 140,767 30.13% 58,920 12.61% 2,434 0.52% 564 0.12% 2,939 0.63%

Utah 53,073 25,845 48.70% 17,526 33.02% 7,809 14.71% 1,729 3.26% 160 0.30%

Vermont 12,361 9,617 77.80% 951 7.69% 1,058 8.56% 577 4.67% 133 1.08%

Virginia 157,160 88,252 56.15% 40,384 25.70% 22,583 14.37% 3,914 2.49% 935 0.59% 1,092 0.69%

Washington 111,069 54,356 48.94% 39,849 35.88% 15,653 14.09% 815 0.73% 243 0.22% 153 0.14%

West Virginia 43,844 26,624 60.72% 12,548 28.62% 3,897 8.89% 61 0.14% 275 0.63% 439 1.00%

Wisconsin 113,999 57,941 50.83% 40,627 35.64% 13,807 12.11% 1,183 1.04% 245 0.21% 196 0.17%

Wyoming 9,823 5,484 55.83% 3,182 32.39% 853 8.68% 65 0.66% 191 1.94% 48 0.49%

United States* 6,015,257 3,262,568 54.24% 1,511,432 25.13% 1,003,091 16.68% 177,140 2.94% 33,726 0.56% 25,924 0.43%

* 50 states and Washington D.C

Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), OMB# 1820-0517:

"Part B, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Implementation of FAPE Requirements," 2005. Data updated as of July 17, 2006.

Special Education Enrollment Data from IDEA - http://www.ideadata.org 3

Page 26: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

222000000444 --- 222000000555 AAAGGGEEESSS 333---555

SSSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN EEENNNRRROOOLLLLLLMMMEEENNNTTT DDDAAATTTAAA

Sorted by State

Source: Special Education Enrollment data from IDEA

http://www.ideadata.org

Page 27: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Ages 3 - 5 Special Education Enrollment Analysis2004 - 2005

3-5 Total Separate Residential

State Enrollment Setting SpEd Setting School Facility

Alabama 8,218 1,871 22.77% 3,040 36.99% 3,192 38.84% 24 0.29% 72 0.88%

Alaska 2,082 447 21.47% 1,021 49.04% 372 17.87% 28 1.34% 67 3.22% 131 6.29%

Arizona 14,062 4,564 32.46% 7,275 51.74% 1,670 11.88% 111 0.79% 220 1.56% 196 1.39%

Arkansas 10,286 2,268 22.05% 728 7.08% 5,303 51.56% 1,351 13.13% 474 4.61% 105 1.02%

California 66,653 21,032 31.55% 30,340 45.52% 8,486 12.73% 239 0.36% 30 0.05% 1370 2.06% 4,995 7.49% 161 0.24%

Colorado 10,540 7,394 70.15% 1,555 14.75% 682 6.47% 105 1.00% 723 6.86%

Connecticut 7,881 1,909 24.22% 1,337 16.96% 1,701 21.58% 41 0.52% 1,663 21.10% 1,217 15.44%

Delaware 2,073 1,049 50.60% 653 31.50% 110 5.31% 165 7.96% 64 3.09% 18 0.87%

District of Columbia 509 351 68.96% 0.00% 0.00%

Florida 34,350 2,887 8.40% 9,919 28.88% 19,187 55.86% 986 2.87% 125 0.36% 1,219 3.55%

Georgia 20,728 9,761 47.09% 8,712 42.03% 1,281 6.18% 234 1.13% 701 3.38%

Hawaii 2,423 239 9.86% 1,532 63.23% 630 26.00% 11 0.45% 10 0.41%

Idaho 4,043 1,068 26.42% 2,228 55.11% 239 5.91% 30 0.74% 215 5.32% 244 6.04%

Illinois 35,454 18,496 52.17% 3,410 9.62% 12,202 34.42% 1,298 3.66% 31 0.09%

Indiana 19,228 9,542 49.63% 7,691 40.00% 1,632 8.49% 260 1.35% 57 0.30%

Iowa 6,118 1,395 22.80% 2,211 36.14% 1,025 16.75% 171 2.80% 1,098 17.95% 196 3.20%

Kansas 9,267 1,647 17.77% 4,675 50.45% 1,645 17.75% 203 2.19% 906 9.78% 168 1.81%

Kentucky 21,317 8,751 41.05% 1,522 7.14% 10,845 50.87% 91 0.43% 101 0.47%

Louisiana 10,597 2,677 25.26% 2,563 24.19% 1,517 14.32% 10 0.09% 11 0.10% 319 3.01% 3,316 31.29% 184 1.74%

Maine 4,348 3,093 71.14% 608 13.98% 227 5.22% 305 7.01% 114 2.62%

Maryland 12,148 2,655 21.86% 2,633 21.67% 2,530 20.83% 388 3.19% 3,680 30.29% 149 1.23%

Massachusetts 15,195 5,835 38.40% 1,956 12.87% 7,146 47.03% 240 1.58% 14 0.09%

Early Childhood Early Childhood

Home

Reverse

Mainstream

Itinerant Srvs

Outside Home

PT Early Childhood

SpEd Setting

Special Education Enrollment Data from IDEA - http://www.ideadata.org 1

Page 28: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Ages 3 - 5 Special Education Enrollment Analysis2004 - 2005

3-5 Total Separate Residential

State Enrollment Setting SpEd Setting School Facility

Early Childhood Early Childhood

Home

Reverse

Mainstream

Itinerant Srvs

Outside Home

PT Early Childhood

SpEd Setting

Michigan 24,290 11,388 46.88% 9,755 40.16% 1,168 4.81% 213 0.88% 411 1.69% 1,342 5.52%

Minnesota 13,402 4,956 36.98% 4,605 34.36% 2,212 16.50% 568 4.24% 980 7.31% 75 0.56%

Mississippi 8,319 4,180 50.25% 2,162 25.99% 1,495 17.97% 187 2.25% 286 3.44%

Missouri 15,268 5,259 34.44% 5,107 33.45% 1,466 9.60% 218 1.43% 170 1.11% 3,047 19.96%

Montana 1,925 507 26.34% 767 39.84% 494 25.66% 7 0.36% 145 7.53%

Nebraska 4,665 2,011 43.11% 1,726 37.00% 183 3.92% 71 1.52% 672 14.41%

Nevada 5,492 574 10.45% 3,642 66.31% 185 3.37% 26 0.47% 8 0.15% 24 0.44% 835 15.20% 198 3.61%

New Hampshire 2,902 1,482 51.07% 1,251 43.11% 120 4.14% 32 1.10%

New Jersey 19,329 2,946 15.24% 9,848 50.95% 2,350 12.16% 1,710 8.85% 2,380 12.31%

New Mexico 6,441 3,312 51.42% 2,524 39.19% 122 1.89% 6 0.09% 476 7.39%

New York 58,297 25,133 43.11% 18,136 31.11% 2,608 4.47% 3,306 5.67% 8966 15.38% 147 0.25%

North Carolina 20,543 14,816 72.12% 3,069 14.94% 610 2.97% 636 3.10% 335 1.63% 1,035 5.04%

North Dakota 1,520 592 38.95% 568 37.37% 107 7.04% 29 1.91% 170 11.18% 51 3.36%

Ohio 22,702 6,019 26.51% 13,833 60.93% 683 3.01% 1,042 4.59% 447 1.97% 671 2.96%

Oklahoma 8,149 3,848 47.22% 1,333 16.36% 1,277 15.67% 41 0.50% 24 0.29% 210 2.58% 1,404 17.23% 12 0.15%

Oregon 5,859 1,485 25.35% 3,978 67.90% 167 2.85% 10 0.17% 134 2.29% 83 1.42%

Pennsylvania 25,964 12,096 46.59% 6,990 26.92% 682 2.63% 449 1.73% 11 0.04% 1353 5.21% 3,902 15.03% 481 1.85%

Rhode Island 2,815 2,351 83.52% 437 15.52% 0.00% 24 0.85%

South Carolina 11,603 2,458 21.18% 2,809 24.21% 2,240 19.31% 53 0.46% 133 1.15% 3,891 33.53%

South Dakota 2,747 289 10.52% 1,458 53.08% 931 33.89% 9 0.33% 52 1.89%

Tennessee 12,008 3,117 25.96% 6,175 51.42% 988 8.23% 192 1.60% 975 8.12% 470 3.91%

Texas 40,236 2,664 6.62% 9,310 23.14% 7,368 18.31% 33 0.08% 207 0.51% 20,622 51.25%

Special Education Enrollment Data from IDEA - http://www.ideadata.org 2

Page 29: 2000055 SSPPPEEECCCIIIAAALLL EEDDDUUUCCCAAATTTIIIOOONNN LRE report 05.pdf · 2004-2005 Ages 6-21 Special Education Enrollment sorted by state 2004-2005 Ages 3-5 Special Education

Urban Special Education Leadership Collaborative

Ages 3 - 5 Special Education Enrollment Analysis2004 - 2005

3-5 Total Separate Residential

State Enrollment Setting SpEd Setting School Facility

Early Childhood Early Childhood

Home

Reverse

Mainstream

Itinerant Srvs

Outside Home

PT Early Childhood

SpEd Setting

Utah 7,395 3,379 45.69% 1,844 24.94% 102 1.38% 557 7.53% 587 7.94% 916 12.39%

Vermont 1,556 996 64.01% 322 20.69% 92 5.91% 110 7.07% 22 1.41%

Virginia 17,480 2,688 15.38% 7,810 44.68% 1,754 10.03% 131 0.75% 13 0.07% 899 5.14% 4,157 23.78% 28 0.16%

Washington 13,429 2,609 19.43% 7,549 56.21% 1,418 10.56% 326 2.43% 1,123 8.36% 362 2.70%

West Virginia 5,833 1,774 30.41% 1,588 27.22% 1,292 22.15% 98 1.68% 1,077 18.46%

Wisconsin 16,077 2,379 14.80% 6,669 41.48% 3,236 20.13% 68 0.42% 88 0.55% 3,630 22.58%

Wyoming 2,380 1,525 64.08% 576 24.20% 173 7.27% 58 2.44% 44 1.85%

United States* 696,146 226,783 32.58% 216,584 31.11% 109,398 15.71% 18,307 2.63% 578 0.08% 216,584 31.11% 69,522 9.99% 7,651 1.10%

* 50 states and Washington D.C

Source: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Data Analysis System (DANS), OMB# 1820-0517:

"Part B, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Implementation of FAPE Requirements," 2005. Data updated as of July 17, 2006.

Special Education Enrollment Data from IDEA - http://www.ideadata.org 3