2006 the mitre corporation. all rights reserved ea in the federal enterprise life cycle september...

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved

EA in the Federal Enterprise Life Cycle

September 2006

Steve DeckerMITRE CorporationCenter for Enterprise Modernization


Observations

“Architecting” at the Enterprise Level of a Department / Agency is not the same as architecting at the Implementation or Operations Levels...

Enterprise Level difficulties result from...

Failure of Communication– Failure to identify Business, Investment, and Infrastructure Dimensions using

owners language vice architects language Failure of Time

– Failure to create and use separate Master Schedule “roadmaps” for Evolution of Mission Capabilities and Enablers

And last but certainly not least...

Failure to “follow the money”– Failure to identify and manage ALL funding sources necessary to deliver a

mission capability

The Identification of a Federal Enterprise Life Cycle and the addition of time and money Dimensions to a Department/Agency EA can

correct these difficulties


Architecting Levels of a Dept/Agency Enterprise

Strategic Planning, Policy

& Oversight

Implementation

Operations

24 / 7 / 365

months to years

annual milestonesEnterpriseArchitecting

SystemArchitecting

ServiceArchitecting

Mission Capability Needs

Mission Capability Delivery

Mission Capability Orchestration

Cycle times

$

t

T

$

t

T

$

t

T

PEOT

PTEO

POET

emphasis on...• Future Mission – what to do next ?

• time – priority phasing• money – priority funding

emphasis on...• Program Execution• Integration of

• People• Facilities• Systems• Support Activities

emphasis on...• Mission Execution• Orchestration of Service Capabilities

POET Priority

P oliticalO perational (mission capabilities)E conomic (time & money)T echnical (people, facilities, systems, support activities)

Architecting Level


defines

Dept / Agency “Enterprise” in Context

Government Mission

LOBs

Legislative BranchExecutive Branch

Budget

Executive Branch

Departments / Agencies / Org’s

OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

PRM

divided into

allocated across

drives

implemented into

measured results

satisfies

Mission & BusinessResults Area inputs

Process & ActivitiesArea inputs

Technology Areainputs

authorizes prioritizes

allocated across

divided into

that fund

influences

TRM

* all $$ - Capital & Non-Capital

improvementopportunities(all levels)

Funding Lines*

that satisfies the mission

Services to Citizens

DRMBRM

SRMvocabulary for Mission Capabilities

Line

of S

ight

Workforce

Installations(Facilities, etc.)

Services(Systems, etc.)

SupportProducts

Measurement Indicators

Customer Results Areainputs

Dept / Agency Missions

Dept / Agency Mission Enablers


How to Achieve Balance across the Enterprise?

defines

DRM

Government Mission

LOBs

BRM

SRM

Legislative BranchExecutive Branch

Budget

Executive Branch

Departments

Programs

Workforce

Facilities Technology

Applications

OPERATIONAL ENTERPRISE

PRM

divided into

allocated across

enabled by

drives

implemented into

measured results

satisfies

measurementinput

measurementinput

measurementinput

authorizes prioritizes

allocated across

divided into

that fund

influences

TRM

business

service

design

• Define Federal Enterprise Life Cycle to balance technology, money, and time priorities

• Expand EA Dimensions to Support FELC

The Federal Enterprise Life Cycle

Program Implementation

MissionPlanning &

Control

FinancialPlanning &

Control


Federal Enterprise Life Cycle - Defined

• Planning & Budgeting• Strategic Planning• Budget Formulation• Capital Planning• Budget Execution• Workforce Planning• Management Improvement• Budget & Performance Integration• Tax & Fiscal Policy• Enterprise Architecture

• Controls & Oversight• Corrective Action• Program Evaluation• Program Monitoring

• Internal Risk Management & Mitigation

• Contingency Planning• Continuity of Operations• Service Recovery

• Regulatory Development• Public Affairs• Legislation Relations• General Government• Revenue Collection

Dept / Agency

Services for Citizens Mode of Delivery Support Delivery of Services

Management of Gov Resources

1 2 3 4• Fiscal Mgmt

• Accounting• Budget & Finance• Payments• Collection & Receivables• Asset & Liability Mgmt• Reporting & Information

• Human Resource Mgmt• HR Strategy• Staff Acquisition• Organization & Position Mgmt• Compensation Mgmt• Benefits Mgmt• Employee Development &

Performance Mgmt• Employee Relations• Labor Relations• Separation Mgmt

• Administrative Mgmt• Information & Technology

Mgmt• System Development• Lifecycle / Change Mgmt• System Maintenance• IT Infrastructure Maintenance• Info Sys Security• Record Retention• Information Management

• Supply Chain Mgmt

Performing the Missions Allocated to the Department / Agency Operating the Department / Agency to Support Mission Performance

Same for all Agencies !!

Federal Enterprise Life Cycle

Processes

are comprised of

these BRM Sub-Functions


Enterprise Architecture Dimensions - Defined


Transition / SequencingEnterprise Roadmap

Programs, Projects

InvestmentPortfolios

Strategic PlanningInitiatives GoalsObjectives

Drivers SpecificationsExecutive OrdersPublic Law

CFRs

Workforce


SupportProducts

Mission Enablers

MissionProcesses

Business Processes

Installations(Facilities, etc.)

satisfies

These are the Business Processes - in the language of the “Operators” or “Mission Owners”

These are the financial line items - in the language of the “Budget Formulation and Execution” people

These are the physical elements that are implemented into the Operational Environment, they enable the Mission Capabilities and are funded by Portfolio Programs/Projects - described in the language of the “Operators” and “Maintainers”

These are the sequencing plans for the Mission Capabilities, Mission Enablers, and the Programs/Projects that fund them

These provide context

Mission Capabilities


EA Dimensions related to FELC Processes


Transition / SequencingEnterprise Roadmap

Programs, Projects

InvestmentPortfolios

Strategic PlanningInitiatives GoalsObjectives

Drivers SpecificationsExecutive OrdersPublic Law

CFRs

Workforce

Installations


SupportProducts

Physical

BusinessProcesses

Business Processes

CustomerResultArea

Mission &BusinessResultsArea

TechnologyResultsArea

MeasuredResults

Bud

get a

nd P

erfo

rman

ce In

tegr

atio

n - L

ine

of S

ight

Capital Planning

Budget Formulation

Budget Execution

Con

trol

s &

Ove

rsig

ht

Controls &

Oversight

Managem

ent Improvem

ent

Mission Capabilities Enablers

Man

agem

ent I

mpr

ovem

ent


Mission Capabilities are the Balancing Point for FELC

Mission Capability

~ ~~

~~

~~

~

BP x

BP y BP z

~ ~~

~~

~~

~

BP x

BP y BP z

x y

z

DataData

InternetInternet

Data

Service Interoperability

Data Interoperability

Workforce Interoperability

Human – MachineInteroperability

SystemInteroperability

Service A

Service B

Intranet

Installation C

Installation D

InitialCadre

InitialCadre

FullCapability

FullCapability

Site n

Commission

CompleteConstruction

Site Acquisition

SiteSelect

BeginConst

TRRSite

Delivery

Mis

sion

Cap

abili

ty

Serv

ices

Supp

ort P

rod.

NIDU NPCA

Initial InvestmentDecision

System xIOC

System xIOC

System xFOC

System xFOC

Inst

allti

ions

StartSelection

Wor

kfor

ce

Site 1

Site n

CAI IOC

For eachSystem

ORD

BOD

SiteAdaptSite

AdaptRule

MakingRule

MakingStandardsStandards

EquipmentCertification

DesignComplete

ISDISD

IDU PCASite 1

IDUIDU PCAPCASite 1

StartProcedures

DevelopTraining Begin Site

Training

CA

Maint.

Ops

~ ~~ ~

J AI

Commission

SiteDelivery CAI IOC ORD

J AI

Commission

IDU PCASite n

IDUIDU PCAPCASite n

StartProcedures

DevelopTraining Begin Site

Training

Site 1

~ ~~ ~

SecurityCertificationFianl Investment

Decision

Phys

ical

Infra

stru

ctur

e

FCA/PCA

Completion points for significant Support Products

Now Next Next Target

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15780.3 682.6 694.1 563.4 461.8 423.0 443.4 399.7 347.7 347.7143.3 123.4 117.4 130.8 255.8 228.7 209.7 219.8 151.6 151.6370.8 400.3 405.7 439.4 484.8 441.8 443.0 444.4 445.5 445.5387.5 374.6 365.1 367.6 367.4 384.3 394.4 406.6 420.2 420.2136.2 167.0 166.5 181.9 185.0 237.8 226.7 195.5 173.8 173.8145.4 135.4 139.4 169.8 89.4 13.1 5.4 4.4 4.5 4.549.1 47.7 30.4 23.6 6.4 6.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

435.5 459.9 478.3 520.7 555.1 586.7 610.2 623.2 648.6 648.6

2,448.0 2,391.0 2,397.0 2,397.1 2,405.6 2,321.5 2,337.7 2,293.6 2,192.0 2,192.0

0.0

500.0

1,000.0

1,500.0

2,000.0

2,500.0

3,000.0

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15

Orchestration of Capability Business Processes Synchronization of Capability Enabler Funding Sources

Sequencing of Capability EnablersInteroperability of Capability Enablers


Capturing Interrelationships is key to FELC Decision Making

Investment Portfolio

Program Line Item

Project

Workforce Installation Service Support Product

1...∞ 1...∞ 1...∞ 1...∞

1...∞

1...∞

Physical Enablers

1...∞

These are the minimum interrelationships that must be captured to answer most time, money, and mission impact “what if” questions throughout the FELC processes...

Mission Capability

1...∞

1...∞A Project must fund at least 1 Enabler

Strategic Planning Initiative

1...∞ 1...∞

Business Process

1...∞A Mission Capability must map to at least 1 Enabler

1...∞

Mission CapabilityInitiative

EnablerInitiative


Roadmaps support FELC

Capabilities

Enablers FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12

drive

FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12

Mission Capability Roadmap

VISI

ON

During the Budget Formulation Process for a Specific FY…Each Org Prioritizes and Refocuses their Strategic Initiatives – There must be 100% mapping to Initiatives

Proposed Mission Capability/Enabler

Improvement Initiatives

Enabler Roadmap

Forecast of “what to do next...”Agency

Org Org Org OrgE

nter

pris

e R

oadm

ap$ $ $ $

WorkforceInstallationsServicesSupport Products

Capability “A”

Capability “B”

Update for Approved Budget


Dimensional Interrelationships – Example

Service B

Strategy Drivers

Mission Capability n

MC n Roadmap

Project m

Project z

Building C

Building D

People M1

People M23

BPx: Access to Care

BPy: Laboratory Ops

BPz: Radiology

Sys 74Sys 32

Sys 99

Mission Capability nEnterTerm Look it up

InvestmentsBusiness

Implementation

ServicesInstallations

People

Systems

What Bus Proc are associated with “MC n”?

What Projects fund “MC n”?

What is the schedule for “MC n”?

What Infrastructure supports “MC n”?

Infrastructure Roadmap

Cluster Diagram Product


Summary / Conclusions

At the Federal Department / Agency Level...– Enterprise Architecting is really Architecting the Enterprise

Architecting the Enterprise requires understanding of time, money, and Mission Interdependencies

– Federal Enterprise Life Cycle is a useful construct for balancing enterprise interdependencies

FEA BRM defines the Business Sub-functions necessary for FELC– Mission Capabilities are a useful construct for highlighting

interdependencies to support FELC decisions Dept / Agency EAs could be expanded to support architecting at

the Enterprise level– Allows creation of new products to support

FELC processes Mission Capability definition and interdependencies

– Uses existing data sources!!


QUESTIONS ??

2006 the mitre corporation. all rights reserved ea in the federal enterprise life cycle september...

Documents