2008 ashp summer meeting seattle, washington educational ... · 2008 ashp summer meeting seattle,...
TRANSCRIPT
2008 ASHP Summer Meeting Seattle, Washington
Educational Session Abstracts
121 Complying with USP <797>: hoods, isolators, and cleanrooms Kilgore, K.M. The CPI Group, 3333 S Bannock St #740, Englewood, CO 80110, USA. Email: [email protected] Wagner, J.T. Abstract: Standards and regulations give guidance for accomplishing a necessary task but still leave enough flexibility to accommodate different operations. In the case of USP chapter <797>, this flexibility has resulted in different interpretations regarding cleanroom facilities. This presentation will share experiences from early attempts to design and build compliant sterile compounding facilities. Explore the various aspects of engineering controls from the following perspectives:
a. What the standards say b. Good examples of compliance a. Look at multiple effective interpretations of each relevant
section b. Bad examples of compliance a. Look at multiple effective interpretations of each relevant
section c. What type of guidance does an architect need
Learning Objectives:
1. Understand the meaning behind the facility requirements in USP Chapter <797>.
2. Develop strategies for compliance based on both positive and negative experiences of past projects.
3. Communicate effectively with the project architects and engineers. Self-Assessment Questions:
1. (True or False) USP recommends that engineering controls used for hazardous drug compounding be vented to the inside environment.
2. For a Class II Type A2 cabinet to be used for processing drugs that volatilize, what must be done?
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
2008 ASHP Summer Meeting Seattle, Washington
Educational Session Abstracts
a. Use more efficient HEPA filters for the supply air b. Vent the BSC to the outside atmosphere to the outside via a
canopy connection c. Vent the BSC back into the room after HEPA filtration d. Only use the BSC when the front sash is fully closed
3. From the list below, check the cabinet that is NOT a recommended engineering control. a. Class II Type B2 BSC b. Class III BSC c. Compounding Aseptic Containment Isolators d. Class II A1
4. (True or False) The B2 is a non-recirculating, externally vented unidirectional airflow device that provides an ISO class 5 environment.
5. What is typical cleanroom temperature range? (What is typical cleanroom temperature range?) a. 66º F to 69º F b. 66º F to 70º F c. 66º F to 72º F d. 60º F to 69º F
6. (True or False) The facility design should ensure the ability to get components into the primary engineering control, without introducing contamination into the Direct Compounding Area.
7. (True or False) Wipes are often chosen over electric dryers, because of the extensive drying time required for dryers that are designed to reduce contamination.
8. Cleanroom walls are either epoxy coated gypsum board or _________ made of cleanroom compatible materials. a. Non-coated b. Interlocking Panels c. Free-standing Panels d. Interlocking Sheetrock
Answers: 1. False; 2. b; 3. d; 4. True; 5. c; 6. True; 7. True; 8. b
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Complying with USP <797>: Hoods, Isolators, and Cleanrooms
Jim Wagner •President, Controlled Environment Consulting
Karl Kilgore AIA, NCARB, President, The CPI Group
Eric Kastango •President, Clinical IQ
Disclaimers
“Although I am a member of the USP Sterile Compounding Committee, I am speaking in my individual capacity and not as a member of the Committee or as a USP representative. The views and opinions presented are entirely my own. They do not necessarily reflect the views of USP, ASHP or any other organization, nor should they be construed as an official explanation or interpretation of <797>.” James Wagner
“I am speaking in my individual capacity. The views and opinionspresented are entirely my own. They do not necessarily reflect the views of USP, ASHP or any other organization, nor should they be construed as an official explanation or interpretation of <797>.” Karl Kilgore
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Session objectives
Explain the meaning behind the facility requirements of <797>Develop strategies for compliance that deliver a functional solutionDescribe how to communicate effectively with engineers and architectsExplain how to use performance criteria to hold the design and construction team accountable
Hierarchy
Means to an End
Design criteria important but not as important as the functionality of the operation
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Hoods, Isolators, and Cleanrooms: Case Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
Starting point
•Anchor Points
• Existing Building
• Central Ante-room
• Minimal Water and Drains
Hoods, Isolators, and Cleanrooms: Case Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
FLOOR PLAN
CONSIDERATIONS
•Product Flow
•People Flow
•Work Flow
•Sterile Environments
•Efficiency
•Standards
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Hoods, Isolators, and Cleanrooms: Case Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
CLEAN ROOM FLOOR PLAN
CONSIDERATIONS
•Work Flow
•Strengths
•Problems
Hoods, Isolators, and Cleanrooms: Case Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
AIR FLOW DIAGRAM
CONSIDERATIONS
•Supply
•Return
•First Air
•Problems
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
What the standards say
Primary Engineering ControlUnidirectional airflow (laminar flow)
First AirState of Control
Unidirectional airflow
The reality – make it work
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Unidirectional airflow
Points of turbulence
Airflow Diffuser
Non Unidirectional airflow
What the standards say
Certification procedures such as those outlined in CAG-003-2006 shall be performed by a qualified individual
Every 6 monthsAfter RelocationWhen AlteredAfter major service to the facility
Certification vs. ValidationUse industry based standards – not “manufacturer criteria”
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Certification
Establish “performance (acceptance) criteria”USP <797>CETA CAG-003-2006Facility design criteria
Hold Contractor/manufacturer accountable to performance criteriaPerformance criteria established by
Owner withCertifier, Architect, Engineer
Cleanroom Certification Priorities
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
What the standards say
Buffer Area parameters – non hazardousISO class 7 during dynamic operating conditions
30 HEPA filtered ACPHSupplied at the ceiling – returned low on the wall50% poss. From PEC
Segregation0.02” – 0.05”w.c. positive ≥ 40 FPM
Temperature≤20˚ C
Appropriate humidity (not specified)35% - 60%
HEPA filter integrity
What the standards say
Ante Area parametersISO class 8 - dynamic operating conditions
ISO class 7 dynamic if serving neg. press. Chemo room30 HEPA filtered ACPH for Class 7
ACPH not specified for ISO Class 8Supplied at the ceiling – returned low on wallTypically no PEC -
Segregation0.02” w.c. negative to non-hazardous buffer area0.01” w.c. positive to hazardous buffer area
Temperature ≤20˚ C
Appropriate humidity (not specified)35% - 60%
HEPA tilter integrity
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Hoods, Isolators, and Cleanrooms: Case Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
NEW PROPOSED
CLEAN ROOM FLOOR PLAN
A
CONSIDERATIONS
•Hood Placement
•Depository Room
•Accessibility (door sizes)
•Janitor’s Closet
•View Site-Lines
•Refrigerator Placement
Hoods, Isolators, and Cleanrooms: Case Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
ORIGINAL PLAN
REVISED PLAN
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Hoods, Isolators, and CleanroomsCase Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
PROPOSED CLEAN ROOM: FLOOR PLAN
A
CONSIDERATIONS
Air Return
Depository Room
First Air
Janitor’s Closet
Air Flow Section
Hoods, Isolators, and CleanroomsCase Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
PROPOSED CLEAN ROOM: FLOOR PLAN A
CONSIDERATIONS
Air ReturnDepository Room
First AirJanitor’s Closet
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Hoods, Isolators, and CleanroomsCase Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
ORIGINAL PLAN
REVISED PLAN
Hoods, Isolators, and CleanroomsCase Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
PROPOSED CLEAN ROOM: FLOOR PLAN B
CONSIDERATIONS
•Hood Placement
•Cost
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Hoods, Isolators, and CleanroomsCase Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
NEW PROPOSED CLEAN ROOM: FLOOR PLAN B
•KEY POINTS:
•Air Return
•First Air
Air flow 2 - FinalAir flow 1 - Original
Hoods, Isolators, and CleanroomsCase Study: Pharmacy Processing and Shipping Facility
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Hazardous and non hazardous small operation
Staring point
Anchor points:
•Existing conditions
• Limited space
•Exhaust
•Drains
Hoods, Isolators, and CleanroomsTypical Layout
FLOOR PLAN
CONSIDERATIONS
•Work Flow
•Air Supply
•Air Return
•Efficiency
•Square Footage Needs
•Adaptability
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
What the standards say
Buffer Area parameters – hazardous applicationsISO class 7 during dynamic operating conditions
30 HEPA filtered ACPHSupplied at the ceiling Care not to interfere with BSC
PEC externally ventedSegregation
0.01” negativeTemperature
≤20˚ CAppropriate humidity (not specified)
35% - 60%HEPA filter integrity
Storage of hazardous drugs12 ACPH, negative pressure
Facility challenges
External venting of PEC for hazardous drug applications
<797>The BSC and CACI optimally should be 100% vented to the outside.
NIOSHDo not use a ventilated cabinet that recirculates air inside the cabinet or exhausts air back into the room environment unless the hazardous drugs in use will not volatilize (evaporate) while they are being handled or after they are captured by the HEPA filter.
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Hoods, Isolators, and CleanroomsTypical Layout
FLOOR PLAN
•KEY POINTS:
•Work Flow
•Air Supply
•Air Return
•Efficiency
•Square Footage Needs
•Adaptability
Get what you paid for
This is only a partial list
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Facility challenges
Open concept cleanrooms
Must maintain ≥40 FPM across all openings
Summary
In the final analysis, an effective working environment for the purpose of patient safety is the objective. Standards compliance is simply a means to an end.
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Complying with USP <797>: Hoods, Isolators, and Cleanrooms
Jim Wagner •President, Controlled Environment Consulting
Karl Kilgore AIA, NCARB, President, The CPI Group
Erik Kastango •President, Clinical IQ
© 2008 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists