2008 commercial gso demand forecast may 2008 chris kunstadter gwynne shotwell comstac technology...
TRANSCRIPT
2008 Commercial GSO Demand
Forecast
May 2008Chris KunstadterGwynne Shotwell
COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working [email protected]
Cover art by John Sloan/FAA
2008 Summary
Methodology / Realization Factor
Trends – Mass / Transponders
Operator Assessment
Macro Economics
Summary
2COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
2008 GSO Summary
2008-2017 commercial GSO satellite and launch demand forecast increased by 1 from 2007
Average 21.8
Average 16.2
3COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Report History
• Commercial GSO launch demand forecast Updated annually since 1993 Methodology has been consistent over time, with ongoing
enhancements to reflect industry evolution
• Update this year - smallest mass class was < 2,200 kg, now < 2,500 kg
10-year forecast horizon (2008-2017)
• 2008 report updates Realization factor Growth in satellite mass and transponders per satellite Industry developments that may affect demand Respondents’ views on factors affecting demand
4COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Working Group Participation
Gwynne Shotwell SpaceX(2008 GSO Forecast Chair)
Beth King Lockheed Martin(2007 GSO Forecast Chair)
Dr. Alexander Liang Aerospace Corp.(T&IWG Chair)
John Sloan FAA AST
Darren Chambo Lockheed Martin
Lisa Hague Aerospace Corp.
Doug Howe / Josef Lore Boeing
Veronica Johnson / Greg Caudel ULA
David Keslow Orbital
Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance
Joanna Malvino / Bill Hayes /Kathy Shockey / Tom Monroe SS/L
Jennifer Miceli Tecolote Research / USAF / SMC / MV
Chris O’Connell Sea Launch
Chris Sanders P&W Rocketdyne
5COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Forecast Data Request
• Ten-year GSO satellite launch demand requested from 92 organizations worldwide
• 29 inputs received (versus 22 last year) Comprehensive
• 6 US and 3 international satellite manufacturers / launch service providers (same as 2007)
Individual
• 20 demand inputs from satellite operators (increased from 13 last year)
• Questionnaire on factors affecting market demand 18 satellite operators responded to questions on how
various factors affected their plans to procure new satellites
• Up from 12 respondents in 2007
6COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Forecast Methodology
• Near-term (2008-2010) mission model “Bottoms-up” by identified satellite Timing and likelihood of launches assessed
• Long-term (2011-2017) demand forecast Average of comprehensive domestic forecasts by mass
categories International input used as a cross check
• Only “addressable” commercial GSO satellites Defined as those open for internationally competitive launch
service procurement 2008 addressable launches includes the first Long March
launch (Palapa D) defined as addressable since 1997
7COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Satellite and Launch Demand Forecast
Large increase in near-term demand from the 2007 forecast
8COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Historical Forecast Comparison
2008 near-term forecast higher than 4 of 5 most recent forecasts
9COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
• The GSO forecast projects demand for satellite launches
• Several factors can affect the execution of a scheduled launch in a given year
Satellite issues Launch vehicle issues Manifesting & scheduling issues Funding Weather Regulatory delays
• A “realization factor” is based on an analysis of historical forecast vs. actual satellite launches for the first and second year of the forecast
No change in this methodology from last year 2007 actuals fell within realization range
Satellite Launch “Realization” vs. Demand
10COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
2007 Actual Satellites vs. Forecasted Demand
Reason for delay Planned Actual
23 18
Launch vehicle (3)• Thor 5, AMC 14 and Thuraya 3
Satellite / launch vehicle (1)• ICO-GEO 1
Satellite (1)• Star One C2
78% actual vs. forecast
Realization factor predicted 15-19 launches
11COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Forecast With Realization
Since implementation of the realization factor, actual number of satellites launched has fallen within adjusted band
12COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Forecast By Satellite Mass Class
Forecast indicates stability in satellites to be launched in two highest mass classes
Smallest satellite class increases in the near term, then decreases and stabilizes
13COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Total and Average Satellite Mass Launched
Average satellite mass stabilizing at ~4,200 kg after peak of 4,500 kg in 2005
14COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Spacecraft Trends: Transponders
Slight drop in average transponders launched per yearAn increase is expected in 2009
15COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Satellite Operator Assessment
Significant Negative Impact
Some Negative Impact
No Effect
Some Positive Impact
Significant Positive Impact
Compared to 2007
Regional or global economic conditions 0% 33% 39% 28% 0%
Demand for satellite services 6% 11% 28% 33% 22%
Ability to compete with terrestrial services 6% 22% 61% 11% 0%
Availability of financing 11% 17% 44% 22% 6%
Availability of affordable insurance 0% 17% 56% 28% 0%
Consolidation of service providers 0% 6% 94% 0% 0%
Increasing satellite life times 0% 17% 72% 11% 0%
Availability of satellite systems that meet your requirements 0% 6% 44% 39% 11%
Reliability of satellite systems 0% 17% 44% 39% 0%
Availability of launch vehicles that meet your requirements 0% 11% 50% 33% 6%
Reliability of launch systems 0% 22% 39% 39% 0%
Ability to obtain required export licenses 6% 17% 56% 22% 0%
Ability to obtain required operating licenses 6% 22% 61% 11% 0%
16COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Satellite Operator Assessment
• Only two areas are more negative than in last year’s survey Ability to compete with terrestrial services Ability to get required licensing
• Remaining are more positive than last year Economic conditions had less negative impact (watch item for next year) Demand for services Availability of financing Availability of affordable insurance (watch item for next year) Availability / reliability of launch vehicles Consolidation of service providers Increasing satellite lifetimes Availability of satellite systems to meet requirements Reliability of satellite systems Availability & reliability of launchers Ability to obtain required export licensing
17COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group2008 Commercial GSO Launch Demand Forecast 5/16/2008
Summary of Findings
• 2008 GSO demand forecast 2008-2017 average annual satellite demand of 21.8 per year (increase by 1
from 2007 forecast) 2008-2017 average annual launch demand of 16.2 per year (increase by 1
from 2007 forecast) 2008 satellite demand of 27, with a realization between 17 and 22
• More positive outlook from respondents than in 2007 Ability to compete with terrestrial services and licensing are the only areas
more negative than last year
• Growth in demand in coming years could be helped by DARS & MSS growth Hosted payloads New commercial launch competitors
• Economic conditions and recent launch failures may impact results in 2008-2009