2008 epsc - accident avoidance

22
Tel: +44 1492 879813 Mob: +44 7984 284642 [email protected] www.andybrazier.co.uk Accident Avoidance

Upload: andy-brazier

Post on 12-Apr-2017

274 views

Category:

Engineering


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Tel: +44 1492 879813 Mob: +44 7984 284642

[email protected]

Accident Avoidance

Page 2: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Learning about accidents

Companies cannot learn everything from their own accidents and incidents

Not many significant eventsLimited resources to investigateInternal mindsetLook at one incident at a time

But don’t always learn from others’ misfortuneDifferent hazard, equipment, controls etc.Skim through the headlines onlyFocus on the last big one.

Page 3: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

BP Texas CityProcess industry has, quite rightly, looked carefully at this accidentIt seemed as if, to some people, the causes were novel and unheard of in the industryI believe the reports actually reflect the current consensus of what causes major accidents.

Page 4: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Previous study

Analysis of major accident reportsPhD in mid 90’s

Published inquiries go far beyond in-house investigationsRecurring findings

One or more ‘fatal errors’Conditions that made the error likelySystem failures contributing to the accident’s likelihood and consequenceAll accidents preceded by similar near missesManagement did not recognise the warning signs.

Page 5: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

My aim here

Not look at accidents in isolationIdentify recurring themesSelect accidents that provide the best illustration of an issueProvide a list of factors that all organisations should look out for.

Page 6: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Piper Alpha

Permit to work failuresWell established systemCompliantNot working in practice

Page 7: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Procedures are essential but…

It is easy to be reassured that written systems and procedures are being usedNo news is good news?

People think they are following the procedure but have not actually understood what is requiredPeople think the procedure is only a guidePeople daren’t say they don’t follow the procedure

Assume people will adapt & take short cutsAudit what people do, not just the paper.

Page 8: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Chernobyl

Communication failuresManagement secretive about design weaknessesOperators did not challenge instructions.

Page 9: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Error is a natural part of communication

It is not what you say, it is what people think you mean

Some messages are taken literallyOther times people ‘read between the lines’

If people are not told about problemsThey will make the wrong decisionsWill not understand why they need to follow procedures

More/better communication is required when unusual events are happening.

Page 10: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Clapham Junction

Technician errorsHighly trainedExperienced.

Page 11: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Training ≠ Competence

Training courses have limited impactMost learning is achieved ‘on the job’

Needs to be plannedTrainees need to be supervised

Time served does not replace the need for competence assessmentCompetent people still make mistakes

Given more complex and demanding tasksIndispensable means less able to take a break.

Page 12: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Herald of Free Enterprise

Door left openShip’s Master did not knowVulnerable design

Page 13: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Layers of protection

UnderstandHow many? Are they independent?

Don’t assume they will workAlways obtain positive indications of operation

Make sure people understand their safety responsibilitiesLearn from near misses

Not just failures, but also what prevented an accidentIf you don’t act, people will assume all is safe.

Page 14: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Bhopal

Methyl IsocyanteRunaway reactionUnable to contain vapours

Page 15: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Reduced throughput does not mean reduced risk

Delaying maintenanceReduced budget or staffPeople get used to systems being inoperable

People are more interested in plants that make moneyHigh rate is more likely to be steady state.

Page 16: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Mexico City

Fractured pipeSlow responseToo late to prevent escalation

Page 17: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Detect → Diagnose → Respond

Have to succeed in all three stagesAND not OR gate logic

Prompt alarmsCompetent people

Plant knowledge and understandingDecision making

ResourcesPeopleEquipment.

Page 18: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

BP Texas City

People in the wrong place at the wrong timeTrailers in plant areaArea not cleared during start up

Slow to raise the alarmA good safety record has its downside.

Page 19: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Generic Learning

Big accidents start smallAccidents occur most during unusual circumstancesIf you haven’t got it, it can’t hurt youKeep people away from hazardsWritten systems & procedures provide poor risk controlMost learning is on the jobError is a natural part of communicationPeople who are tired make more mistakesSafety devices can create complacencyDon’t assume safety devices are working.

Page 20: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Generic Learning (cont.)

Everyone needs to act if they know something is unsafe You need to challenge your emergency arrangementsPeople must be prepared to raise the alarmAnyone who may have to deal with the consequences of an accident has to know what they are dealing withMake sure you learn from near missesAll incidents have multiple causes and this should be seen in your investigationsDon’t overlook sabotageNon-operational parts of the business can be hazardousDon’t believe your safety is good (enough).

Page 21: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance

Conclusions

Before major accidents most managers didn’t have particular concerns about safety

Not perfect, but did not foresee the riskReassured that systems were in place without having good evidence that they were effectiveOnly heard or listened to good news

The biggest risks occur because of the errors and poor judgements made by those managers

High reliability organisations expect failures High reliability organisations expect failures and so work hard to avoid themand so work hard to avoid them

Page 22: 2008 epsc - accident avoidance