20080521 - san diego reader - gghcdc mad

8/2/2019 20080521 - San Diego Reader - Gghcdc Mad

1/15

MAD Gets IrateBy Dorian Hargrove| Published W ednesday, May 21, 2008

TEXT SIZE: A | A | ASUBSCRIBE TO THIS COLUMN

MORE DORIAN HARGROVE MORE GOLDEN HILL

MORE NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS SEND LETTER TO THE EDITORSEND TO A FRIEND SUBSCRIBE TO THIS COLUMN

PRINTER FRIENDLY

At the Greater Golden Hill Maintenance Assessment District (MAD) meeting

on May 19th, most of the members spent the entire 90 minutes in protest to

the hiring of a project manager without their consent. Some members on the

MAD Advisory Committee -- in charge of overseeing and implementingmaintenance projects in the areas of South Park and Golden Hil l -- were

upset with the Greater Golden Hill Community Development Committees

(GGHCDC) decision to hire a person for the full-time position without their

knowledge, despite being given a number of applications to review.

The infighting amongst the board members started with the announcement of

the new employee, Im happy to announce that Alia Kananis first day will be

on May 21st, Laura Stangel , MAD board member whom also serves on the

GGHCDC, said at the meeting. She has a Bachelors in Environmental

Studies and a Masters from SDSU and Im sure she will make a great addition

to the team.

Well, how much are you paying her? MAD committee member Bill Hilsdorf

asked. You hire someone and you dont know what you are paying her? Ive

been negotiating deals for 40 years and Im very pissed off that I was shut out

of this process.

Hilsdorf wasnt the only one upset. All but three members appeared frustrated

about the process and confused as to their overall responsibilities as board

members.

Im disgusted by how this whole process went on behind our backs, said

board member Lisa Vella . And Im totally embarrassed th at other people

knew that someone was hired before I did, and I sit on the board!

The debate was so contentious that chair of the committee, David Skillman

implemented the Roberts Rule of Orders- a formal method to conducting

meetings where each person speaks when called on and only have three

minutes to respond.

The debate lasted so long-one member actually got up and left the meeting-

that several pending items to be reviewed by the board were postponed until

the next meeting. The board, however, did reach a solution. A motion was

made at the end of the meeting to establish more communication between the

MAD Advisory Board and the Community Development Committee, although,

no specific details regarding how that would occur were given.

MADs next meeting will be in two weeks to discuss more possible solutions.

The meetings are open to the public and are l isted on the Greater Golden Hill

Community Development Committees website- www.goldenhillcdc.org-

under the Clean, Green and Safe link.

COMMENTS

#1.

LookAway, good job of looking out for the community's interests.

These so-called public interest organizations in San Diego inevitably

STORIES GOLDEN HILL | NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS

Diego Reader | MAD Gets Irate http://www.sandiegoreader.com/news/2008/may/21/mad-g

10/31/2011 1


2/15

turn into slush funds for the well-connected. They ought to be

abolished.

Look at how CCDC has betrayed the citizens of San Diego, foisting the

high costs of John Moores private ballpork and a disastrous condo-

bubble on us all , diverting the tax dollars into the pockets of their

friends, and stripping away badly needed infrastructure investments.

Yes, th ey power wash the sidewalks, but underneath the sewers and

water pipes are ancient. Little Italy's ArtWalk was flooded, forcing the

artists to scramble to save their work but golly those sidewalks and

trash cans sure are pretty. The phrase "putting lipstick on a pig" comesto mind.

Meanwhile, the homeless population continues to grow, traffic gets

worse, while our public transit is expensive, slow, sometimes dangerous,

and very poorly designed. Yet the poobahs in charge are well-paid and

insulated from any criticism of their many self-serving mistakes.

The residents of Golden Hill should be offered a petition to abolish this

organization before it wastes any more money.

If you like, feel free to use w w w .ch a n gesa n di ego.or g to draft the

petition and allow the citizens to comment. Then I'll be willing to help

you go door to door and collect signa tures.

Fred Williams

By Fr e d _ W i l l i am s 10:39 a.m., May 23, 2008 > Report it

#2.

Come on down to the Reader launch party next Wednesday at the W

downtown. We can strategize.

Fred

By Fr e d _ W i l l i am s 11:50 a.m ., May 23, 20 08 > Report it

#3.

Three things to note about the Golden Hil l MAD meeting... First, this

committee has been charged with spending the voter approved funds on

Golden Hill Projects. They have not spent one dime on improving

Golden Hill.

Second, they have populated their meetings with procedural bather and

tail chasing. This is because many of the committee member's stated

goal is the removal of this newly created special benefit zone. People can

critize Marco as much as they like but Little Italy is a great

neighporhood as a result of has work... and Golden Hill could be thatway also were it not for the efforts the NIMBYs who have side tracked

the MAD committee.

Third, anyone who was at that committee meeting would have

witnessed a lesson in del iberate disfunction. Visit

ww w.fe a r a n d loa th in gon gold en h ill.com for a better review of the

meeting.

By k n o w n a s b e n 1:08 p.m., May 23, 2008 > Report it


10/31/2011 1


3/15

#4.

"Seedy bar and restaurant owners"? There are only a handful of people

who would fit into the category of bar and restaurant owner and to call

them seedy would seem like an unwarranted slap in the face for making

the Golden Hill area a desired San Diego attraction. Honestly, I hate

politics, but had to comment because I, as a property owner, had been

given an opportunity to vote. In having that opportunity to vote, I chose

to have the MAD formed. If there's proof in that someone had influence

of the vote, by ushering in of the votes, then please present it otherwise

you minimize the effort I made and others l ike me to vote. Are youcertain, that the CDC board members are unelected? As a member of the

community and present at a number of meetings held over at the Moose

Lodge, there seemed to be a somewhat democratic process in the

assignment of an individual to the board. The statements made above in

regards to that seem to be deceptive. It's stated that the board is

comprised of realtors, investors and developers. Can you state how many

on the board fit those categories? It would help to know since they a re

being accused of being propaganders of their own interests.

As a member of the community, I'm curious...was your na me on th e flyer

that was placed in my mailbox, that in my opinion, seemed to riddled

with scare tactics of what th e MAD would be?

- A concerned member of the Greater Golden Hill community

By s d c l i m b e r g a l 9:42 a.m., May 24, 200 8 > Report it

#5.

sdclimbergal, You didn't read the comments by LookAway very carefully.

Being familiar with the facts, I assure you that LookAway wrote nothing

that isn 't correct and documented. There is way too much to sh are with

you here to inform you, but here are some of the more entertaining and

amusing facts: Do you know that the owner of the Moose Lodge voted

against the MAD? Do you know that Hueso's brother voted against it?

Want an example of CDC propaganda? Here's one: Do you recall that

multicolor pro-MAD mailer the CDC sent out, with the photo of a

retaining wall at the end Ivy? CDC claimed that the graffiti on the wall

had been there for months and months, because the City wouldn't

respond to requests to clean it? Well, I put that to the test: I put in a

request on the City's online graffiti website and within one week the

City sent a cleaner. The City has been that good for many years, every

time we've reported graffiti. And the City blasts the graffiti off the

sidewalks instead of doing the ugly paintovers (which just provides a

canvas for new graffiti). Do you recall the graffitied street sign in the

same mailer? That sign is at the end of the street where some of the

main longtime CDC members live: they can do what we do on our street,

which is to take 3 minutes and a cloth with a li ttle mineral spirits and

wipe off the graffiti . I wash my own sidewalk, sweep my own curb, as domy neighbors. The City streetsweeper comes twice monthly and does a

great job. If the sidewalks in front of the Turf Club or Luigi's (both

buildings owned by CDC members) need washing, the owners should do

it, not me. Not you. Not the City. Just keep repeating: No to

Privatization.

By S o u t h P a r k 7:40 a.m ., May 25, 2008 > Report it

#6.


10/31/2011 1


4/15

sdclimbergal, One more thing: you might be interested in a really cool

article by Sara Reistad-Long that a ppeared in the NY Times on May 20

2008 ("Older Brain Really May Be a Wiser Brain"), based on research

and studies reported in Progress in Brain Research. For those older,

longtime residents of South Park who have watched the CDC scheme

and try the same things over many years, the propaganda and

pied-piper smiley false reality that the CDC presented to achieve their

goal of controlling a private tax honey pot are all too familiar. Those

older and wiser property owners are not distracted by the propaganda,

but absorb it and parse it for what it means. The fresh young faces th atthe old CDC people install to persuade young people like you are a

transparent distraction. With age, if you are bright enough, you usually

get interested enough in politics to know what you are really voting for.

By S o u t h P a r k 8:31 a.m., May 25, 2008 > Report it

#7.

I am irate! WHY THE HELL ARE MY STREETS NOT CLEAN YET!!!!

A year ago we voted as homeowners in support of a management

assessment district for Golden Hill. I am irate over what the advisoryboard has been doing for Golden Hill , NOTHING. This is NOT what I

voted or paid for and I'm tired of waiting for results!!

To this day we continue to walk past our schools looking at gang graffiti,

we continue to see trash blowing down our streets, and we continue to

wish our sidewalks in better repair.

The money that Golden Hil lers have put aside is NOT city money and it

sure the hell does not belong to the advisory board!!! This money is for

the use of OUR community and only our community. The residents

voted for this and it's time for results!! The funds th at have been

accumulated must be used for the common good of Golden Hill. MAD

needs to start working now!!

It is unfortunate that we currently have a VERY FEW people in GoldenHill who are trying to derail and negatively influence the advisory board

and MAD program. These few are playing to a special interest and are

discarding the votes of the majority of homeowners in Golden Hill who

support MAD.

I support Golden Hill, and I support MAD.

By L o v e _ T h a t _ G o ld e n _ H i ll 11:31 p.m., May 25, 200 8 > Report it

#8.

Love: When the smoke in your head clears, you might check the facts:

the City did not sign the legal contract with the CDC, so that they could

access our tax dollars, until April 2008, a full year after the 2007/2008

tax dollars were in the coffers. You should complain to the City, if you

aren't happy. The MAD Oversight Committee, elected by the

community, has no responsiblility for the failure of the City and the

CDC to enter into a contract.

Also: Our residential streets are swept twice monthly by the City; so,

what are you talking about, dirty streets? The streets are cracked and

potholed, of course, but the assessment dollars can never be legally

spent on that sort of infrastructure repair. So, I guess you will be thrilled

when some privvate company is handed our tax dollars to clean an

already clean but very broken street or sidewalk. Totally crazy, but so is


10/31/2011 1


5/15

the tone of your crazy comment.

By S o u t h P a r k 12:34 p.m., May 26, 200 8 > Report it

#9.

As is typical in this city, the assessment is levied for one purpose, and

then diverted to another.

Remember when CCDC was set up? It was to prevent the revitalization

of downtown from taking tax revenue away from other neighborhoods.

Well, the exact opposite has happened. Projects like the ballpark come

directly out of the general fund, reducing money available for police,

fire, parks, or pensions. Similarly, Little Italy uses its money to benefit

local businesses with various events and special cleanings, trashcans,

and even chairs on the street.

Meanwhile, crucial infrastructure is ignored in Little Italy. That's why

ArtWalk ended this year with a water main break that flooded the entire

event.

So the Golden Hills or Grantville plan may look good on paper now, but

inevitably it will be manipulated by well-paid insiders. Everyone willpay, but only the few will ever benefit.

This is why I now think ALL these special assessment districts have to

be closely exa mined, and in many cases disbanded. What purpose they

once served is no longer being served, and the money has been taken

away from the public and stashed in private pockets.

Best,

Fred Williams

By Fr e d _ W i l l i am s 2:38 p.m., May 26, 2008 > Report it

#10.

SouthPark, thank you for the reference to the NY Times article and

pointing me in the right direction. There is a lot to be said about the

experiences we go through and the experiences from which we learn...or

hopefully learn. I further went on to look into Shel ley H. Carson's

publication from June 2006, Mindfulness and Self-Acceptance in the

Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, whose work

was cited in that article. It makes a good read, especial ly on the topic of

the Mindfulness of Mistakes (p. 35):"...making mistakes is an indicator

that one is willing to engage with the environment and try things even

when the outcome is uncertain" and "[t]he mindful a pproach to past

mistakes is to look at them from multiple perspectives and find theperspective that provides either new knowledge, motivation for change,

and/or an opportunity to teach others a valuable lesson." This leads me

to the following questions: now that the MAD has come to fruition - why

does the goal exist to dissolve or petition against it by opponents of the

MAD who always had the idea it was wrong (in other words, a mistake)?

Why cant I, as a Golden Hill community member (wh o happens to be

keen on the neighborhood), or my neighbors with young children,

simply see the benefits of a clean, green and safe community, for which

an assessment district given a budget, ha s the objective to provide,

regardless of the political ties and what not? If the community worked

hard to provide a slate of unbiased candidates for the MAD who

subsequently were voted onto the MAD, shouldnt those "unbiased"


10/31/2011 1


6/15


7/15

bunch of NIMBYs! The MAD Advisory board is just that; ADVISORY! It

sounds like if it doesn't happen to your satisfaction, it sucks. Keep

complaining until no one wants to work with you. No wonder Golden

hill is what it is...slowly moving into gentrification, but you can still get

heroin. Instead of attacking the GGHCDC why don't you put some of

your people together and start your own CDC? Running a nonprofit is

hard work, harder than running a business. Complaining that your skill

set (Hilsdale)was not tapped is dumb...did anyone know you had that

skill set? Or are you just a legend that all are supposed to treat like some

oracle? ? As far a advisory groups go, they are just that, ADVISORY! The

CDC is a legally l iable entity, and an advisory group is not. Get over it

and quit trying to micro-manage. If you were thinking properly you

would work th e room to share your skil ls, contacts and IN FLUENCE the

outcomes. I am tired of advisory groups that think they are in charge, if

you are not taking personal liability, go find some solutions that reduce

liability to the CDC. Or better yet get the hell out of the way!

By a r t d o g 9:55 a.m., May 27, 200 8 > Report it

#14.

It's hard work... From what quarter of sanity and reason have I heardthat before...? The crazies, with all of their CAPS and !! ! emerge from

the tacky bars and clubs to spew out their brilliant ideas. Please note

that the advisory committee consists of a majority of CDC rah-rahs and

CDC Board members. You are way confused.

By S o u t h P a r k 10:41 a.m., May 2 7, 200 8 > Report it

#15.

Then shouldn't LookAway get the facts straight?

"The Advisory Committee was elected in a taxpayer-funded election tooversee the very tax dollars paid over as fealty to the Corporation. For

the election, members of the community worked hard to provide a slate

of unbiased candidates. The Corporation worked hard to fill the elected

seats with their candidates. The Corporation lost when there were

community candidates running aga inst their sycophants; the

Corporation won only the uncontested slots (based on type of property

owned) and thus *lost control of the committee majority*."

To make an argument on the source of my data is a mute point. I don't

believe I presented any in my last post, other than the publication you,

SouthPark, advised me to review.

By s d c l i m b e r g a l 11:09 a .m., May 27, 200 8 > Report it

#16.

Good job, you found out my email address and discovered my name and

then looked on publicly available records to find my house on the Mills

Act contact.

Placing my name a nd address on a blog is another bad form of

intimidation. In fact it is very scary tactic that someone would stoop

down so low and be so careless while remaining anonymous. (Privacy

Policy)


10/31/2011 1


8/15

My comment may not have been nice and subtle, however, it's my

opinion and I have a right to share that. As you do too. I apologize if I

came off to strong but I stand by my words and I've cooled off now.

I am not ashamed to say my home is on the Mills Act. I would not have

been able to afford Golden Hill otherwise. Particular right now. I'm a

full time student at City College working on an Ethnic Studies degree

dreaming to become a teacher. As for work, I work at a self dog wash.

My spouse was recently laid off from his job and no work appears to be

available locally. Economic times are hard.

When I first moved to Golden Hill my house was a mess , bars on

windows, security l ights surrounding, and mold eating away the floors.

The garage was in complete disrepair. We have seen what happens to

homes like these if it was not for historic districts and the Mills Act.

People get desperate and they sell their homes to gas stations (shell on

Broadway) or tear them down and create "Mc Mansions" or they build

undesirable condos.

Every last wednesday of every month we have a tour group. The tour

group is made up of seniors who once lived and stil l live in Golden

Hill/South Park. They love the fact that we invite them into our home

religiously. Every month we sh ow them the projects we are working on

and give them the history of the home (we have a lot of wonderful

information). They also share their many stories with us about growing

up in Golden Hill/South Park. Never do we hide from them the fact that

this house is on the Mills Act.

I'm running out of time to finish this comment. I have a fence waiting to

be built in the backyard. So i must shorten this before the sun comes

out. I see it peeking behind the clouds.

As you can see we are very busy people and we ca re very much about

Golden Hill. To call the police every time we have a problem is difficult,

expensive, and time consuming for the city, the police dept, and us.

When we as a community could do everything ourselves.

I support Golden Hill and I support MAD.

Shawn Freeman

By L o v e _ T h a t _ G o ld e n _ H i ll 11:26 a.m ., May 2 7, 2008 > Report it

#17.

I appreciate the spell correction (typos are a fact of life and easily

happen when multi-tasking), but that does nothing to clarify what is

fact and what is fiction.

By s d c l i m b e r g a l 11:28 a.m ., May 2 8, 200 8 > Report it

#18.

sdclimbergal, Last word: it's "moot" not "mute."

Mute is what the oligarchists prefer of their minions. Moot is a legal

term referring to a motion or case, as practiced in a Democracy.

Love, Love your new tone, glad you are so busy. But you aren't serious,

are you? You think the assessment taxes can be spent on a private

militia to protect you, because "To call the police every time we have a

problem is difficult, expensive, and time consuming for the city, the

police dept, and us."? Are you serious? Better buy a gun and build that


10/31/2011 1


9/15

fence with broken glass on top, because if you are too busy to work with

the good police force we all support and admire, then you are on your

own. When I first moved here in the 80s, there was a meth house

nearby. I worked intensely with the police, spent huge amounts of my

time collecting data and making reports, for at least a year, and the

police knew just what to do to resolve the problem. And according to the

rules of a Democracy. That's why we pool our tax dollars into the

General Fund, so that we won't need militias and little mafias running

around on behalf of private enterprises. If you want that kind of

craziness, you should volunteer for duty in Baghdad, today. Might solve

the unemployment problem for you and your spouse.

Jeesh!

By S o u t h P a r k 11:18 a.m ., May 28 , 2008 > Report it

#19.

What are you talking about #25? Guns?? Who is talking about guns?

Did you not read my blogs?

I like how you have nothing to say about your friend stealing my email

address tracking me down and publicly outing my name and street. All

the while a privacy policy sits at the end of this page.

P.S.

Thanks for your work in the 80's. I really mean that.

By L o v e _ T h a t _ G o ld e n _ H i ll 5:51 p.m., May 28 , 2008 > Report it

#20.

Comment removed by website administrator.

#21.


#22.


You must be a registered member to post comments.

Not a member? Sign up h er e !

Log in to comment

Username:

Password:

Login Forgotten your password?

Sign up

Your e -mail: Signup


10/31/2011 1


10/15

April 24, 2012

Maintenance Assessment District (MAD)Business Improvement District (BID)

South Park Neighborhood Association (SPNA)Golden Hill Neighborhood Association (GHNA)

Golden Hill Community Association (GHCA)Greater Golden Hill Planning CommitteeFriends of Balboa Park & Golf Course

Anti-MAD Community Volunteers

Verses

City of San DiegoGrater Golden Hill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC)

These documents are related to an ongoing 17 years conflict between the Citizens

(Property owners) of the communities of SOUTH PARKand GOLDEN HILL, of SanDiego, California, battling against the employees of the City of San Diego, and the GreaterGolden Hill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC) who dishonestly andmaliciously caused the illegal establishment of a Maintenance Assessment District over themajority objections of the Citizens [property owners]. This to specifically provide fundingand support with additional property assessments (taxes/fees) to be provided revenue to aprivet membership corporation (GGHCDC).

In 2012 the battle is continuing although the Citizens clearly and decisively won every courtcase, which ORERED a Writ of Mandate, vacating the unconstitutional and illegalgovernmental actions/proclamations establishing the Grater Golden Hill Maintenance

Assessment District (GGHMAD) for the benefit of and administration by the Greater GoldenHill Community Development Corporation (GGHCDC). As of today the City employees arecontinuing the Battle and are refusing to return the stolen monies by the government to theproperty owners.

These Documents are provided to CITIZENS to assists you in fighting the tyranny of ourGovernments uncaring Politicians, and their dishonest, officious, manipulative, bullingBureaucrats. They were obtained and provided from many sources and volunteers towhom we shall never forget their goodwill and good-works.

I recommend you to first review the following document repaired by community volunteers

to better understand what has transpired to this point in time:

20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.pdf

I also would recommend that you contact the following Anti-MAD Points of Contact:

www.goldenhillmad.blogspot.commadmatters@cox.netwww.madenoughyet.com


11/15

INDEX [LIST] OF RELATEDDOCUMENTS & PUBLICATIONS

19720000 - Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972.pdf19890000 - MAP - South Park & Golden Hill.pdf

19940000 - GGHCDC Revitalization Project.pdf19951010 - GHCDC Excutive Director Report.pdf19951010 - GHCDC Revitalization Plan Community.pdf19951019 - GHCDC Boad Directors.pdf19951024 - South Park Association 01.pdf19970000 - CA Gov. Code section 53753.pdf19970000 - TAX Right to Vote Proposition 218.pdf19970609 - MAD City Resolution 288830 MAD Ballot.pdf19980608 - SD MAD MuniCode.pdf

20000614 - MAD local-light mad.pdf20000628 - GGHCDC Board Agenda.pdf20000810 - GGHCDC MAD Misc Docs.pdf20000810 - MAD GGHCDC - Kessler Letter.pdf20000901 - GGHCDC MAD Hal Tyvoll Protest Flier - Tovel.pdf20010213 - CDC Newsletter.pdf20010305 - GGHCDC MAD Reminder Letter.pdf20010330 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf20010401 - MAD GGHCDC Status Report.pdf20010401 - MAD SD Park Dept.pdf

20010403 - MAD GGHCDC Status Letter.pdf20010412 - MAD GGHCDC Letter.pdf20010425 - GHHCDC NewCity 01-10.pdf20010425 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf20010600 - GGHCDC MAD Newletter.pdf20010608 - CMADJuneNewsletter2001.pdf20010613 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Councilmember.pdf20010623 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Mayor.pdf20010710 - MAD GGHCDC Letter - Atkins.pdf

20020108 - MAD SD Process Ord1975.pdf20020108 - The MAD Process.pdf20020313 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf20020430 - GGHCDC $150 Council Agenda.pdf20021021 - BID GGHCDC.pdf20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Business Districts.pdf20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Community Center.pdf20021029 - GH Planning Committee - GGHCDC Joint Committees.pdf20030500 - SD Code MAD Lighting.pdf


12/15

20040000 - SD Policy#100-21 MAD Formations.pdf20040913 - MAD Formation Handout.pdf20040913 - San Diego MAD Formation Handout.pdf20050000 - MAD BUDGETS 2004-8 v6_cedadmin.pdf20050425 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf20050622 - MAD SD Self-ManagedMAD-CityFY2006Budget.pdf20060000 - GHCDC BoardRooster.pdf

20060311 - MAD Court Rulling Greene.pdf20060318 - GHCDC ActionPlan.pdf20060401 - GGHCDC strategicPlan2006.pdf20060600 - GGHCDC eLetter3_06.pdf20060601 - SD Block Grants amendfyar07.pdf20060627 - MAD Council Meeting pmfinal.pdf20061200 - MAD FUNDING SIDEWALKS pmpchap7.pdf20070000 - FY08 MAD 06v3revenue.pdf20070000 - San Diego CityBEAT - poochPolitics.pdf20070101 - GGHCDC Self History.pdf

20070300 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Survey.pdf20070300 - MAD North Park AER.pdf20070400 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report-NO APPENDIX.pdf20070400 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report.pdf20070400 - SD Developemnet services.pdf20070401 - GGHCDC MAD Tony Atkins News.pdf20070406 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf20070423 - GHCDC MAD Request Council Agenda JUNE 2007.pdf20070511 - City San Diego City GGHCDC MAD - Ohedia.pdf

20070521 - Hal Tyvoll MAD Ltr to Council.pdf20070600 - GHCDC City Grants FY07.pdf20070600 - MAD City FY08v3 CIP Budget.pdf20070607 - Plan Group juneagenda.pdf20070608 - MAD GGHCDC Letter 01 - Mayor.pdf20070608 - MAD GGHCDC Letter 02 - Aguirre.pdf20070609 - GGHCDC Meeting.pdf20070612 - Council Agenda - GHCDC MAD1.pdf20070615 - GGHCDC MAD cert of mailing_1.pdf20070615 - GGHCDC MAD cert of mailing_2.pdf

20070616 - MAD GGHCDC SD City Flier.pdf20070617 - NP News- GHCDC MAD SD CITY Advertisement.pdf20070618 - GGHCDC MAD SD City Ballot.pdf20070618 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Letter.pdf20070619 - GHCDC MAD - SD City Opposition Consultant.pdf20070621 - Citizen No GGHCDC MAD Ltr to James T. Waring.pdf20070630 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report-02not complete.pdf20070701 - No GGHCDC MAD Flier.pdf20070702 - Citizen No GGHCDC MAD Ltr to Toni Atkins.pdf


13/15

20070702 - GHCDC MAD SD CITY Flier.pdf20070702 - Toni Atkins Leter.pdf20070706 - Dear Neighbor Letter - No MAD tax.pdf20070708 - MAD GGHCDC Todd Gloria TaxpayersAdvocate.org.pdf20070709 - MAD Fellow Neighbor Helpful Note.pdf20070710 - GGHCDC MAD Ben Hueso Website.pdf20070710 - GGHCDC MAD Vote No Flier.pdf

20070712 - MAD 18July07 MAD Meeting CHANGE.pdf20070712 - MAD GGHCDC City SAN Diego Parcels.pdf20070712 - NoMADTax - Gerrymandering.pdf20070716 - Neighbors Communications & Response from SD Clerk.pdf20070718 - GHCDC MAD Meeting CHANGE.pdf20070719 - SCI MAD san diego golden hill response.pdf20070723 - CA Code 549546.pdf20070723 - CA Code R28830.pdf20070723 - CA Constitution-ARTICLE 13 _Prop. 218_.pdf20070726 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf

20070726 - San Diego Reader MAD GGHCDC.pdf20070730 - MAD GGHCDC - NOT A HONEST VOTE.pdf20070800 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20070900 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20071000 - GGHCDC MAD Directory.pdf20071000 - GGHCDC MAD Oversite Committe.pdf20071100 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20071207 - GGHCDC MAD Ballots Oversite Committe.pdf20080000 - GGHCDC brochurefinal_so (3)_1.pdf

20080000 - GGHCDC MAD City Contract 2008-9.pdf20080123 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080200 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080200 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20080204 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080225 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee By Laws.pdf20080225 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080317 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080421 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080519 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf

20080519 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20080521 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20080600 - GHCDC MAD SCI Engeneers Report.pdf20080602 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080616 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080617 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20080620 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20080714 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080715 - GGHCDC MAD Notice of Inviting Bid .pdf


14/15

20080723 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20080730 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20080818 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee Procedures.pdf20080818 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20080819 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20080900 - GGHCDC MAD Newspaper.pdf20080915 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf

20080917 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20081020 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20081022 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20081112 - SD 21.reporttocitycouncilfy09.pdf20081117 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20081118 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20081215 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20081216 - MAD MAP SD City.pdf20081230 - HUD Audit - San Diego ig0991005.pdf20090105 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf

20090202 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20090302 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20090303 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20090307 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20090323 - GGHCDC MAD sidewalk repair Letter.pdf20090406 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20090504 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20090601 - GGHCDC MAD Oversight Committee.pdf20090606 - GGHCDC MAD Oversite Committe.pdf

20090629 - GGHCDC MAD Promotions Letter.pdf20090630 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT-fy092ndreprogramming.pdf20090707 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20090717 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20090814 - MAD Democratic Values and Special Assessments.pdf20090918 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20090930 - GGHCDC MAD Disband Oversight Committee Vote.pdf20100000 - FY11 SD budget MAD 14v1appendix.pdf20100203 - MAD Court Final Judgment GHAA.pdf

20100203 - MAD Court Findings Judgment GHAA.pdf20100223 - GHNA - MAD help.pdf20100324 - MAD University Avenue - uampmtgpresentation.pdf20100411 - MAD GGHCDC Illegale $732,746 Budget.pdf20100421 - San Diego Reader - CDC No Refunds.pdf20100501 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20100600 - MAD GGHCDC.pdf20100726 - fy11ao.pdf20100831 - GHHCDC Audit.pdf


15/15

20100913 - MAD VENDOR LOT SUMMARY 9958.pdf20101001 - GGHCDC MAD Annual Report 2009.pdf20101105 - GGHCDC Hotline Investigation 11-5.pdf20101110 - UTSanDiego.pdf20101120 - 25th Street Project.pdf20101201 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20110000 - MAD 25th Street.pdf

20110200 - MAD Oversight Cmte agenda-Feb 2011.pdf20110415 - GGHCDC 25thFINAL-FLYER#3.pdf20110504 - GGH CPUAC.pdf20110505 - GGHCDC 25th St Project.pdf20110510 - GGHCDC MAD Farmer's Market.pdf20110517 - SD Developemnet services.pdf20110600 - FY11 SD budget 10_37.pdf20110600 - SD Planning Groups contactlist.pdf20110604 - Fed Report CDC990-ending Aug 2010.pdf20110604 - Fed Report CDC990.pdf

20110711 - GGHCDC MAD Audit.pdf20110726 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20110900 - GHHCDC Boardmembers.pdf20110922 - COURT Appellate-Final Ruling-D057004.pdf20110922 - D057004.PDF20110922 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20111003 - Todd Gloria & David Alvarez GGH MAD D3_D8 Memo.pdf20111004 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20111006 - GGHCDC MAD BMurry email.pdf

20111014 - California Taxpayers Association - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20111014 - San Diego Uptown News - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20111020 - NP NEWS - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20111021 - San Diego Reader - GGHCDC MAD.pdf20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.pdf20111031 - GGHCDC MAD HISTORY.ppt20120000 - MAD 25th Street v3schedule1.pdf20120215 - UTSanDiego.pdf20120219 - SD Planning Groups contactlist.pdf20120312 - GGHCDC MAD City Dissolution.pdf

20120329 - Property Tax Letter 2011-12.pdf20120412 - Greater Golden Hill Planning Committee.pdf20120412 - UpTown News Artical.pdf20120419 - GGHCDC Meeting Agenda.pdf20120419 - GGHCDC WebPage.pdf20120422 - Marco LiMandri - New City America.pdf20120423 - GGHCDC MAD Trash Cans.pdf20120900 - GGH Planning.pdf