2009 03 24 lunchtalk

41
1 The I ntention Economy: What Happens When Customers Get Real Power 24 March 2008, Berkman Lunch Thing

Upload: doc-searls

Post on 08-Jul-2015

524 views

Category:

Business


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Doc's lunch talk at Harvard's Berkman Center. Link here: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/luncheon/2009/03/searls

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

1

The Intention Economy:

What Happens WhenCustomers Get Real Power

24 March 2008, Berkman Lunch Thing

Page 2: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Problem Example: People vs. Comcast

• 13 August 2007: Mona Shaw hammers her local Comcast office. Literally.

• 8 January 2008: “Comcast CEO Roberts Pitches CES on 100 Mbps Cable and Project Infinity” by Rob Beschizza in Wired.

• 25 January 2008: “ Comcast, Please Stop Bugging Me For Money I Don't Owe You” by Rob Beschizza in Wired.

2

The real problem: Comcast can’t fix itself alone. Nobody on the sell-side can.

Page 3: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Another Problem: Loyalty Cards

Loyalty cards are the Green Stamps of our time.Worse, they leverage something that’s broken about e-

commerce…— That you have to become a “member” and “sign in” to buy

anything.They inconvenience the customer and cause friction at every

point.And they are actually stupid about the most essential data.

3

Page 4: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Case in point: the Harvard Coop

Nice place. Loved shopping there.Until I got tired of paying +10% for not

belonging.4

Page 5: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Joining any loyalty program

is a pain in the butt.

I failed the first few times I tried filling it out. 5

Page 6: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Now I’m a member. Which means I have to

care about this:Why should I have

to fill all this junk out?

… over and over, for every “relationship”?

Because they aren’t my “relationshps.” They’re my data in somebody else’s base.

6

Page 7: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Another failure:Donating money to

WMBR.

What I like

7

Page 8: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

How? Where?

8

Page 9: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Umm…

9

Page 10: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

So, how about…

10

Page 11: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Okay, I give up.

11

Page 12: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

And another: WUMB

12

Page 13: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Bring on the friction!

13

Page 14: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Aye, we hardly knew ye.

14

Page 15: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

The problem in all these cases is Customer Relationship

Management

It’s not really about relating.It’s about marketing. It’s to you, not with

you. 15

Page 16: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

CRM is a $12 Billion business…

… that doesn’t work.Except by its own metrics.Which barely include you.

Which is why Mona obeyed Howard Beale.

16

Page 17: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

17

The problem is that most big business still thinks the best customer is a

captive one.

That’s why they “acquire,” “manage,” “control” and otherwise “own” creatures they call “consumers.”

And that’s why…

Page 18: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

18

A “free market” is still “your choice of captor.”

Even though the Net is now in the middle of everything.

Page 19: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

19

We have to prove that a free customer is more valuable

than a captive one.

That’s what VRM is all about.VRM is Vendor Relationship Management.

Page 20: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

20

VRM is how customers,anywhere in the long tail…

…can create and manage real relationships with vendors.

Or with any organization.

Page 21: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

21

VRM is the reciprocal of CRM.

VRMCRM

It will provide ways for customers to drive vendors...

And not just to be driven by them.With VRM we can relate for real.

Page 22: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

22

With VRM, the individual is the point of integration for his or

her own data.

… and the point of origination for what’s done with it.

Page 23: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

23

We have an activeand growing community

— with hotbeds in Europe & North America

Page 24: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

24

VRM is an open source project.

There are already over hall a million open source code bases out there to work with.

We’re using some of those, and making a few more.

Page 25: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

25

Page 26: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

26

Here is someof what we want VRM to

do.

Page 27: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

27

Manage our own health care data.

This is a tall order, and very long term. But there are some great people (especially

around here) working on, for example, personal health records (PHRs).

Page 28: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

28

Issue a “personal RFP”to whole markets, on the fly.

For example, send a message saying you need a 200w 220->110 converter

in Amsterdam on a Sunday afternoon…— without giving any more than the required

information.

Page 29: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

29

Assert useful Terms of Service.

Instead of this jive:

You agree we aren't liable for annoying interruptions caused by you; or a third party, buildings, hills, network congestion, rye whiskey falling sickness or unexpected acts of God or man, and will save harmless rotary lyrfmstrdl detections of bargas overload prevention, or in the event of random siding management retrenchments, or Elvis leaving the building. Unattended overseas submissions in saved mail hazard functions will be subject to bad weather or sneeze funneling through contractor felch reform blister pack truncation, or for the duration of the remaining unintended contractual subsequent lost or expired obligations, except in the state of Michigan at night. We also save ourselves and close relatives harmless from anything we don't control; including clear weather and oddball acts of random gods. You also agree we are not liable for missed garments, body parts, or voice mails, even if you have saved them. Nothing we say or mumble here is trustworthy or true, or meant for any purpose other than to feed the fears of our legal department, which has no other reason to live. Whether for reasons of drugs, hormones, gas or mood, we may terminate this agreement with cheeful impunity, and there’s not a damn thing you can do about it.

Accept.

Page 30: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

30

Create a new business modelfor free media.

(one that ’isn t advertising)

Free media include…Non-commercial broadcasting

Blogs, podcastsMusic…

Anything that’s either free on purpose or too easy to “steal.”

Starting with public media.

Page 31: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

31

The model is called PayChoice.

It will be based on the ability of individuals to…

pay as much as they wantfor whatever they want

whenever they wantwherever they want

on their terms as well as those of sellers.

Here’s where we plan to see it first:

Page 32: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

32

VRM will inform CRM.

Listeners and viewers will bear their end of the relationship burden

with stations.Relationship can be enlarged to mean far more, and include far

more.

Page 33: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

33

Relating will have its own symbol:

We call it the “r-button.”It says,

“I want to pay…what I want.” And/or,

“I want to relate…on my terms…

and not just yours.”“This is my code’s way

of letting your code know that.Even if you’re not listening.

Yet.”Its how VRM meets CRM.

Page 34: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

34

The r-buttoncan represent different

states:For example…Intention to buy (and/or to

relate).Intention to sell, but also to relate

on your (the buyer’s) terms, as well as your own.

Existing relationship — which can be viewed and unpacked on either side.

Among others. This is still wide open.

Page 35: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

35

Here are a few ways it might look:

(Note: These are old drafts.)

Page 36: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Back to the title question:

What happens w hen cus tomers get ?real pow er

36

Page 37: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Customers will get their own pricing guns.

They won’t be able to price everything.But the seller won’t be the only one holding

these things.37

Page 38: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Customers and Vendors will both get to wear

matching rings.

Or magnets.Whatever we call them, “relationship” will be

a fact…… rather than marketing jive.

38

Page 39: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

The Intention Economywill get real.

It will be based on what customers actuallyw ant .

Rather than the “attention economy” of guess ing what customers want.

… or “driving” customers to want stuff. 39

Page 40: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

The advertising bubblewill burst.

No, advertising won’t go away. We’ll always need some.

It just won’t be the communications method of first resort.

Or the only business model that comes to mind.

40

Page 41: 2009 03 24 Lunchtalk

Cluetrain will finally be right.

So let’s talk.41