2009 changes in california discovery rules the california electronic discovery act batya swenson...
TRANSCRIPT
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY
RULESThe California Electronic Discovery Act
Batya Swenson
E-discovery Task Force
BACKGROUND
• Federal courts and 20+ states have already codified discovery rules for electronically stored information (“ESI”)
• ~95% of all business data
• 100 billion
California’s E-Discovery Rules
• Let’s just call it the EDA for now (Electronic Discovery Act)
• The EDA modifies existing discovery provisions to specifically account for ESI discovery
• EDA's provisions set out the manner for requesting, responding to and producing ESI, including subpoenas for ESI.
Been there….
• Since 2006, federal courts have specifically addressed the discovery of ESI
• EDA is similar to the federal rules
• EDA establishes ESI’s importance in state court litigation
THE EDA
• Why is it important to you?
• What key concepts may affect you?
• What’s new and different?
WINNING CASE AND AVOIDING SANCTIONS
• Attorney is often an outsider and needs your help– New client, New department, New type of case– Gathering evidence, imposing hold, responding to discovery
• Sanctions mandatory as always for discovery abuses– No more excuses for failure to manage and preserve ESI – Monetary, Evidence, Issue Sanctions
• NEW - Safe Harbor Rule – Does not avoid preservation obligation– Routine, good faith operations of IT systems – Retention policy/program
• Discrepancy or consistency in implementation? – Corruption of data
PARTIES MUST ACT EARLYTO AVOID LOST ESI
• Not a new concept in discovery but more developed and codified with respect to application to ESI
• Where Records Managers are most likely very involved
• Preservation Obligation – “Reasonable anticipation of litigation”– What does this mean? Claims; Demand letters; Complaint– Who decides if the obligation has been triggered?– Be proactive – no sanctions for too much care and attention
• Litigation Holds – Initial Analysis (Relevant ESI/Custodians/Sources/BackUp/Retention Program)– Implementation – Who’s the point person– Communication and Buy In – Confirmation by staff– Oversight – Duration of litigation– Attorney’s Role – As required by courts
NEW - FORM OF PRODUCTION• Form of ESI identified in discovery
Result: requests more sophisticated requests in state court matters
• RESPONSESAs requested OR Ordinarily maintained & reasonably
usable
• OBJECTIONS: “must identify the types or categories of sources of ESI that it asserts are not reasonably accessible”
NEW - EARLY MEET AND CONFER REQUIREMENT
• Pre-CMC Meet and Confer Conference Topics– Preservation – Form(s)– Timing– Scope – Privilege (Clawback Agreement)– Confidentiality (Protective Order)– Cost allocation– Catch-all; Discovery plan (Phased)
NEW - THE STANDARDWHAT COUNSEL WILL FACE IN A DISCOVERY MOTION
• NOT REASONABLY ACCESSIBLE – BURDEN OF PROOF• “UNDUE BURDEN OR COST”: BALANCING TEST
– Less expensive, more convenient source– Unreasonably cumulative or duplicative– Ample opportunity to obtain the information through discovery– Burden/expense v. benefit
• amount in controversy• parties’ relative resources • importance of the issues in the litigation• importance of the requested discovery in resolving the issues
• YOUR ROLE– Helping counsel gather the facts– Tracking investment of staff time and other hard expenses– Declaration under penalty of perjury – PMK Depositions
• COURT CAN ORDER PRODUCTION BUT REALLOCATE COSTS
NEW - SUBPOENAS
• Issuing party must take reasonable steps to avoid undue burden or expense on non-party
• Similar rules in terms of form apply• Responses in requested form• Burden still on objecting party on issue of
reasonable accessibility• Court can order production but reallocate costs
– Track expenses
BEST PRACTICESFOR RECORDS MANAGERS
• Will vary with size and type of organization– subpoenas, repeat litigation, other responsible staff and support
• Implement retention policy if it exists– consult with counsel about the policy or writing one
• Inform yourself of IT structure, data management and destruction processes
• Educate and assist counsel • Act early and stay invested when a matter arises• Understand scope of matter, key players & potential
exposures• Communicate with internal case contact, IT and/or
attorney • Monitor implementation of hold internally
EXAMPLES
• Back-up tape recycled and Inbox of former employee lost
• Key employee laptop hard drive not searched
• Text Messages not captured
• Automatic email deletion program