2009 ohio river basin landcover comparison

58
Huntington District US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Land Cover Comparison Using GIS Joe Trimboli, MS, CFM Community Planner Huntington District 17 August 2009 …...and lots of SQL

Upload: bzjoe

Post on 24-Jun-2015

285 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation given at 2009 Ohio Floodplain Managers Conference and Poster displayed at Hanover College Rivers Institute Conference

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®

Land Cover Comparison Using GIS

Joe Trimboli, MS, CFM Community Planner Huntington District 17 August 2009

…...and lots of SQL

Page 2: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Land Cover Comparison

Need for Comparison Ohio River Basin Comprehensive Report Study

(ORBCRS) www.orboutreach.com

Page 3: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Page 4: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Land Cover Comparison Goals

Identifies land use changes in the Ohio River Basin

Incorporate map set into MapRecon portion of study Create access table that links to HUC8 watershed for

map creation Create map for each land cover classification

Page 5: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Data

Sources National Land Cover Datasets of 1992 and 2001 Downloaded from USGS

Used seamless server Template Selection Best meta data available

USGS Watershed Layer (CORPSMAP) CorpsMap is the USACE nationwide enterprise GIS

implementation Data source for many federal agencies

Page 6: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Data Preparation

Created mosaic raster layer using ArcMap 9.2 for each data set, 1992 and 2001 (6 template areas)

Created raster of HUC8 watersheds Insured all raster’s had same projection

Matched land cover projection Converted HUC8 data to match land cover data

Insured all raster's had same cell size Defined HUC8 raster layer to match land cover cell size

Page 7: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

HUC8 raster file reprojected and with matching cell size to land cover layers

Page 8: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Process Verification

Used various processes Evaluated data numerous times Different tools Different ways

Model Creation Spatial Analyst Tools > Combine

Page 9: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Model creation proved to be awkward and time consuming based on existing knowledge

Page 10: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Found Combine tool while researching process

Page 11: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Combine

Creates new raster layer Combines multiple layers

Intersecting raster cell values Creates Discrete properties table NOT Floating Point

Page 12: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Adds columns' in attribute table that correspond to each raster layer

Page 13: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Data Check: Identify point

on map Open

Attributes Table

Scroll to matching pixel value

Verify layers and column names

Page 14: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Export all attribute tables to Microsoft Access

Page 15: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Microsoft Access (SQL)

Format of Personnel Geospatial Database Manipulates tables Ability to create and manipulate data Non-spatial Tables Creation custom queries

Page 16: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Tables

Page 17: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Land Cover Comparison Goals

Identifies land use changes in the Ohio River Basin

Incorporate map set into MapRecon portion of study Create access table that links to HUC8 watershed for

map creation Create map for each land cover classification

Page 18: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Comparable Study

Page 19: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

USGS Data Research

Page 20: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

NLCD 1992-2001 Anderson Level I Cross-walk Table

Page 21: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Crosswalk Table Creation

Page 22: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Original Class Values from Raster Layer

Page 23: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Cross walk tables

Create tables from original raster layer table and corresponding USGS modified Anderson Level I table information. Created new Description.

Page 24: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Unique Anderson Class Table

Page 25: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Unique Anderson Class Table - Update

Page 26: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Unique Anderson Class Table - Update

Page 27: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Class Table Importance

There must be the same number of classes in each comparison year for a DIRECT comparison Not an issue at the larger Ohio River Basin level Not an issue at smaller area comparisons Issue at the HUC8 scale of comparison

Page 28: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Make Table Query

Page 29: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

HUCAnderson with Combine1

Each Cell with HUC8 value code, and original class codes of 1992 and 2001 land cover

Each HUC8 watershed with total cell count and new class codes

Page 30: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Reclass Query Design

All like values are linked between tables

Page 31: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Reclass Query Results 1992

Page 32: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Reclass Query Results 2001

Page 33: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Time to Merge Tables

Page 34: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Initial Merge Results

Page 35: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Initial Merge Results

How do you calculate change percentage and map it?

Page 36: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

SQL Formulas

Page 37: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

SQL Formulas

1992 & 2001 IIf(IsNull([1992reclass!COUNT]),0,[1992reclass!COUNT]) ChangeRatio: IIf([1992]=0,([2001]/HUCAnderson!Total),[2001]/[1992]) Percentage: IIf([2001]>[1992],[changeratio]*100,[changeratio]*-100)

Page 38: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Results

Page 39: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Almost There…

Page 40: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Single Class Queries

Page 41: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Single Class Queries

Page 42: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Final Goal

Page 43: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Final Goal

Page 44: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Page 45: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Page 46: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Page 47: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Page 48: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Page 49: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Page 50: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Accuracy Concerns – 1992 Original

Page 51: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Accuracy Concerns - 2001

Page 52: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Accuracy Concerns – 1992 modified

Page 53: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Resulting Hypothesis

The land cover change from different sources is outside the 9% standard distribution curve of the percent change (location quotients) of the watersheds. The 90% represents the difference of equipment and seasonal variation.

Page 54: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Land Cover Comparison

1992 and 2001 land cover data was downloaded from the USGS National Map Seamless Server and reclassified based on the USGS Anderson Level I cross walk table. Both layers were then combined using ESRI ArcView and the supporting tables exported to Microsoft Access. The tables were then manipulated to extract the location quotients (LQ) for each class and joined based on HUC8 values. A HUC8 class table was created that insured a direct comparison of 7 classes.

Page 55: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Poster

A poster was from ESRI ArcMap with charts created in Microsoft Excel. Two large panels represent the Anderson Level I classified land cover for the project area. Small 7 map panels, one for each land classification,were mapped based on the standard deviation (StdDev) of the location quotients calculated in Microsoft Access. The StdDev values of the LQ’s within the 95% range were then mapped hollow. The charts reflect the raw LQ values crossing at the value of one.

Page 56: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Page 57: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Questions

?

Page 58: 2009 Ohio River Basin Landcover Comparison

Huntington District

Internet Atlas

Ohio River Comprehensive Reconnaissance Study (ORBCRS)

http://www.tinyurl.com/orbmaps

http://www.lrh.usace.army.mil/silver_jackets/ORB/thu

mb.html

http://www.lrh.usace.army.mil/silver_jackets/ORB/2009HanoverLandCoverPoster2009.pdf