2010-2011 campus improvement plan - landry

8/6/2019 2010-2011 Campus Improvement Plan - Landry

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/2010-2011-campus-improvement-plan-landry 1/13



Campus Improvement Plan 2010-2011

2

CIC MEMBERS

Name Position Years

Served

Signature

Lance Hamlin Principal 4 Lance Hamlin

Jennifer Bordelon Kindergarten Teacher 1

Stacey Whitehead First Grade Teacher 2 Stacey Whitehead

Sheba George Second Grade Teacher 1

Lisa Burns Third Grade Teacher 2 Lisa Burns

Trenise Sholes Fourth Grade Teacher 1

Rolanda Williams Fifth Grade Teacher 2 Rolanda WilliamsJade Melton Specials Teacher 1

Marilyn Rivera Counselor 3 Marilyn Rivera

Elizabeth Shileds Special Education 1

Anne Barnhill ESL – Instructional Facilitator 3 Anne Barnhill

Sanil Sheriff ELA Instructional Facilitator 3 Sanil Sheriff

Mr. Craddock Parent 1

Mrs. Craddock Business Partner 1




3

PLANNING PROCESS

Needs Assessment

The Campus Improvement Council is composed of representative professional staff, parents of students enrolled at the campus,business representatives and community members. The Campus Improvement Council establishes and reviews campus educationalplans, goals, performance objectives, and major classroom instructional programs. An annual Campus Improvement Plan guides thiswork. The Campus Improvement Plan is based on a comprehensive needs assessment which includes student achievementindicators, disaggregated by all student groups served by the campus. Additional factors such as school processes (e.g., attendance,graduation, tardies, discipline referrals, teacher absences), perception (e.g., staff, parent and community surveys), and demographics

(e.g., enrollment trends, staff turnover) are to be considered.

The Campus Improvement Plan is to include (TEC Chapter 11, subchapter F, section 11.253):1. Assessment of academic achievement for each student using the student achievement indicator system.2. Set campus performance objectives based on the student achievement indicator system, including objectives for special needs

populations, including students in special education.3. Identification of how campus goals will be met for each student.4. Identification of resources needed to implement the plan.

5. Identification of staff needed to implement the plan.6. Timelines for reaching goals.7. Periodic, measureable progress toward the performance objectives.8. Goals and methods for violence prevention and intervention on campus.9. Program for encouraging parental involvement.10. Goals and objectives for a coordinated health program (elementary and middle schools) which is based on student fitness data,

student academic performance data, student attendance rates, percentage of students who are educationally disadvantaged thatensures that students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity.

Annual analysis of the plan and review of various assessment data are used to determine objectives that address campusgoals. Specific strategies and action steps are developed to address these objectives. This process ensures a commitment toexcellence and a resolve to provide the best instructional plan for every student.




4

Campuses receiving Title 1 funds must address Title 1 targets in campus plans and indicate where Title 1funds will be spent.

Title I --Targeted Assisted ( TA )Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program

TA 1. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standardsTA 2. Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planningTA 3. Methods and strategies based on scientifically based researchTA 4. TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programsTA 5. Highly qualified teachersTA 6. Professional DevelopmentTA 7. Increase Parental InvolvementTA 8. Coordination of federal, state, and local services

Title I -- School-wide Components (TS)TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessmentTS 2. School-wide reform strategiesTS 3. Highly qualified teachersTS 4. Professional developmentTS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high need schools

TS 6. Parental involvementTS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programsTS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessmentsTS 9. Students’ difficulties identified on a timely basisTS10.Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services




5

The Goal of C-FB ISD is high achievement for all students.

Supporting Objective 1: Continuously increase student achievementA. TEA Recognized/Exemplary DistrictB. Recognized/Exemplary SchoolsC. Adequately Yearly Progress (AYP)D. Achievement GapE. Special PopulationsF. TAKS Commended Scores (all students)G. Higher Education Readiness Component (TSI) (EXIT Scores)

H. SATI. PSAT/NMSQTJ. Advanced PlacementK. Graduation Data

Supporting Objective 2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staffA. Out of School SuspensionsB. DAEP PlacementsC. Attendance Rate

Supporting Objective 3: Continuously increase operational effectivenessA. Financial Integrity Rating System in Texas (School FIRST)B. Increase percentage of operating expenditures expended for instructionC. Fund balance as a percentage of the total expenditure budget excluding TIF and Chapter 41 paymentsD. Kilowatt hour per sq. ft. usageE. Overtime hoursF. Highly Qualified Teachers

G. Teacher Classroom Attendance RateH. All Staff Attendance RateI. Teacher Turnover RateJ. Availability of Critical Technology Systems

Supporting Objective 4: Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school systemA. Parent Survey - Achieving Quality TogetherB. Stakeholder Survey (to be developed)

C. Staff Survey (to be developed)




6

SMART GOALS

RESULTSGOAL

Should identifywhat is desired

in terms ofperformanceafter, or as a

result of, puttingnew processes

in place orimprovingexisting

processes.

SMARTGOAL

Goal shouldbe Strategicand specific,Measurable,Attainable,Results-

based, andTime-bound.

INDICATORStandards and

objectives (weak areasfor students)

MEASURESTools we’ll use todetermine wherestudents are nowand whether they

are improving.

TARGETSThe attainable

performance level we

would like to see.

Remember . . . The one accomplishment that would foster longer-range actions would be a goal worthy of commitment.

- Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline (1990)

90% of allsubgroups

will meetor exceedthestandardforpassingMathTAKS

By the end ofthe schoolyear, studentswill self-

select/developappropriateproblemsolvingstrategies inorder to passMath TAKS.

Objective 6Mathematical

Processes

WeeklyTEKS Boxesassessment

District UnitAssessments

UPS Check / weekly

Classroomdiscussions

Objective 2Probability /

statistics

Objective 1Number

operations

Objective 3Geometry / spatial

reasoning

90% of allstudents will passthe TEKS Boxassessments

90% of allstudents will passthe unit assessments

90% or moreof all studentsmeet orexceed TAKSpassing standard




7

Name of CampusCampus Goals & Objectives

2010 TAKS, PARTICIPATION, & ATTENDANCE DATA2011 GOALS

All Students African American Hispanic White Special EdEconomicallyDisadvantaged

LEP

INDICATOR2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

2010Data

2011Goal

Reading/English Language Arts 93 95 91 95 89 93 95 100 77 80 90 95 86 90

Mathematics 90 95 83 90 93 95 100 100 86 90 85 90 100 100

Writing 93 95 91 95 90 95 100 100 60 70 92 95 * *

Science 94 95 89 93 100 100 100 100 * * 90 95 * *

Social Studies

All Tests

Graduation 2009

Graduation 2010 Goal

Participation: Reading/Language Arts 100 100

Participation: Math 100 100

Attendance 96.5 100

SMART GOALS (Example)

90% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS ReadingObj. 1 – Basic Understanding

85% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing TAKS Math

Obj. 1 – Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative Reasoning Obj. 6 – Mathematical Processes and Tools




8

Tom Landry

Campus Goals

2010 Percentage of Commended Students

2011 Goals

All Students African American Hispanic White

INDICATORCam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Cam-pus

StateDiff.

from

state

2011Goal

Reading/English

Language Arts41 35 + 50 32 25 + 40 33 28 + 40 52 48 + 60

Mathematics 39 37 + 50 30 23 + 40 25 31 - 40 43 47 - 60

Writing 32 30 + 50 20 21 - 40 30 25 + 40 71 38 + 80

Science 39 44 - 50 29 28 + 40 50 36 + 60 50 59 - 60

Social Studies

Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged LEP

INDICATORCam-

pus State

Diff.from

state

2011

Goal

Cam-

pus State

Diff.from

state

2011

Goal

Cam-

pus State

Diff.from

state

2011

Goal

Reading/EnglishLanguage Arts

8 17 - 25 33 26 + 40 50 23 + 60

Mathematics 13 17 - 25 31 28 + 40 63 25 + 70

Writing * 11 * 25 21 22 - 40 * 20 * 50

Science * 24 * 25 29 33 - 40 * 20 * 50

Social Studies




9

Tom Landry2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #1: Continuously increase student achievement

Campus Focus # 1 Criteria for Success Performance Measure

90% of all subgroups will meet or exceed the standard for passing D,EMath TAKS 2011

5% increase in commended on TAKS in all areas F

Campus Rating if Exemplary for 2011 B,C

Improve StudentAchievement

Campus Focus #2 Criteria for Success Performance Measure85% students in grades K-4 will be reading on level by May 2011 D

Minimum of 50% of 5th

students will meet target growth in reading as D

measured by Spring 2011

Increase number of students

reading on level in K-5

Campus Focus #3 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureLandry students will increase their HFZ by 3% in two assessments areas: D

Curl-ups and sit & reach.

Improve student achievement

on two fitnessgramassessments




10

Tom Landry

2010-11 Campus Focus

District Supporting Objective #2: Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Campus Focus # 4 Criteria for Success Performance Measure15% reduction in the number of office referrals from 2009-10 A,BImprove School Climate

Campus Focus # Criteria for Success Performance Measure

Campus Focus #? Criteria for Success Performance Measure




11

Tom Landry


District Supporting Objective #3: Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Campus Focus #5 Criteria for Success Performance Measure15% reduction in the number of overtime hours for our building compared to E

2009-2010

Reduce the number of over-time hours of

paraprofessional

Campus Focus #6 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureCampus-wide discussions, book study on what makes an effective teacher F

effective

Improve understanding of teacher effectiveness





12

Tom Landry


District Supporting Objective #4: Continuously stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Campus Focus #7 Criteria for Success Performance MeasureIncrease PTA membership by 20% from 2009-2010 A

Increase number of parent volunteers A

Increase parent-community survey effectiveness by 10% A

Improve ParentalInvolvement



2010-2011 campus improvement plan - landry

Documents