2011 03 16 the physics of wind park optimization...wind energy generation is based on momentum...
TRANSCRIPT
The Physics of Wind Park OptimizationThe Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Stefan Emeis
INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Atmospheric Environmental Research
Stefan [email protected]
INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATE RESEARCH, Atmospheric Environmental Research
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Research Center of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu
Photo: Vattenfall/C. Steiness
Energy from the wind
3116 3
21
2716 AvP
227
P power W air density kg m-3
A rotor area m2
v wind speed m s-1 but is it this simple? …
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
2 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
16/27 Betz’ factor -
M t l i l h ff ti tiMeteorological phenomena effecting energy generation from the wind (yields and loads)
phenomenon effect on yield effect on loadsphenomenon effect on yield effect on loads
vertical wind profile increase with increase withgrowing hub height growing hub heightgrowing hub height growing hub height
shear layers (inversions) differential loads
low-level jets nocturnal maxima nocturnal maxima
extreme winds shut-down of turbines extreme loads,extreme winds shut down of turbines extreme loads,immediate damages
turbulence intensity higher yields higher loadsy g y greduced wake lengths
turbulence profile with height differential loads
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
3 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
day
Nocturnal low-level jet (LLJ) and turning of wind direction with height(northern hemisphere)
dayL
CCwell-mixedboundarylayer
HPP CC
layerFF
nightL
frictional
stable HPP CC force
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
4 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
surface layer
LLJ
26 June 2005Paris, Ch. de Gaulle airport
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
5 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
SODAR measurements
frequency of LLJ over Hanoverfor 20 months in the years2001 to 2003
total is 23.17% of all nights
circulation types:
BM ridge over Central EuropeHB high over British IslesHB high over British IslesHM high over Central Europe...
HFZ high over Scandinavia HNFA high over North Atlantic ...
“efficiency” of a circulation typeto produce a LLJ over Hanoverfor 20 months in the years
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
6 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
2001 to 2003
10 min extreme wind speed at FINO1
18
20
10 min extreme wind speed at FINO1
y = 0.4961x - 5.9433R2 = 0.9881
12
14
16
8
10
12
ln(p
))
2
4
6
-ln(-l
v(90)50-year event
4
-2
01-year event1-month eventRayleigh_44Weibull_k 2.05_C 10.3
-6
-4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
v90 10-minute average (m/s)
_ _Linear (extrapolation [>18m/s])
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
7 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
v90_10 minute average (m/s)
1 sec extreme wind speed at FINO1
18
20
1 sec extreme wind speed at FINO1
y = 0.3614x - 4.4466R2 = 0.9854
14
16
18
10
12
ln(p
))
4
6
8
-ln(-
0
2
4 v90_1s50-year event1-year event1-month event
-20 10 20 30 40 50 60
v90 1-second gust (m/s)
Linear (v90_1s)
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
8 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
v90_1-second gust (m/s)
extreme winds shut-down of turbines extreme loads,immediate damagesimmediate damages
This turbine has been damagedby gale force winds in NorthernGermany in February 2011
forecasts of extreme windditi i t tconditions important
Photo: dpa, Hamburger Abendblatt, February 6, 2011http://www.abendblatt.de/region/article1778907/Niedersachsen-duchgewirbelt-Feuerwehr-im-Dauereinsatz.html
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
9 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
Wind parks
what happens when turbines are close together? …
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
10 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization16.03..2011
wake formation behind a wind turbine
less wind speed- less wind speedahead of the next turbine in a wind park
- more turbulence
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
11 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Photo: Vattenfall/C. Steiness
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
12
source: http://www.4coffshore.com/offshorewind/
16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Wind energy generation is based on momentum (energy) extraction from the air
momentum extraction decelerates the windmomentum extraction decelerates the wind
(1) wind park efficiency depends on the equilibrium wind speed ( ) p y p q pin the interior of the park
- equilibrium between extraction and re-supply of momentum
(2) wind park wakes influence other wind parks downstream
- wake length is inversely proportional to the momentum re-supply
for wind park design it is important to know:1) the magnitude of wind speed reduction in the park interior2) the length of wakes
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
13
2) the length of wakes
16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
1) the magnitude of wind speed reduction in the park interior
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
14 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
15 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
basic idea of the analytical model
reduction of windspeed in the park interior
hhteff
uuzuuc
0*2
(calculation of theequilibrium conditionfor the momentum fluxes) extraction = re-supply from above
mff z
turbine flux-gradient-relationshipd fand surface
drag
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
16
Emeis, S., 2010: A simple analytical wind park model considering atmospheric stability. Wind Energy, 13, 459-469.
16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
solution of the analytical model
momentum extraction by the turbines
surface roughnessy
reduction of wind
surface roughness
thermal layering of the PBL
turbine-induced turbulence
speed in the park interior(calculation of theequilibrium conditionfor the momentum fluxes):
hs
mizh cTf ,2,
hsizh
tR,2,
teff
mizh cTf 2,
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
17
16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Emeis, S., 2010: A simple analytical wind park model considering atmospheric stability. Wind Energy, 13, 459-469.
reduction of wind speed in the park interior
mean turbine distance:mean turbine distance:10 rotor diameters
turbine-induced turbulence 10.1%
mean turbine distance:8 rotor diameters8 rotor diameters
turbine-induced turbulence 12.6%
mean turbine distance:6 rotor diameters
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
18 16.03..2011
6 rotor diameters
turbine-induced turbulence 16.8%
Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
reduction of wind power in the park interior
mean turbine distance:mean turbine distance:10 rotor diameters
turbine-induced turbulence 10.1%
mean turbine distance:8 rotor diameters8 rotor diameters
turbine-induced turbulence 12.6%
mean turbine distance:6 rotor diameters
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
19 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
6 rotor diameters
turbine-induced turbulence 16.8%
reduction of wind power in the park interiormeasurements at Nysted wind park (Baltic sea)
Barthelmie R, Frandsen ST, Rethore PE, Jensen L., 2007:Analysis of atmospheric impacts on the developmentof wind turbine wakes at the Nysted wind farm.Proceedings of the European Offshore Wind Conference
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
20
Proceedings of the European Offshore Wind Conference, Berlin 4.-6.12.2007.
16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Optimization of turbine density in a wind parkOptimization of turbine density in a wind park
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
21 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
2) the length of wakes
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
22 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
23 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
basic idea of the analytical modelanalytical model
zuu speed-up of wind speed downstreamof a wind park:
)( 02*
hnhhn uu
zzu
tu
speed-up = re-supply from above
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
24
Emeis, S., 2010: A simple analytical wind park model considering atmospheric stability. Wind Energy, 13, 459-469.
16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
solution of the analytical model
momentum extraction by the turbines
surface roughness
speed-up of wind speed downstream
thermal layering of the PBL
turbine-induced turbulence
speed downstreamof a wind park:
t )( atuu
utu
R hnhnn
exp11
)( 0
uu hh 00
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
25 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Emeis, S., 2010: A simple analytical wind park model considering atmospheric stability. Wind Energy, 13, 459-469.
recovery of wind speed (left) and power (right) behind a wind park, mean turbine density: 8 rotor diameters
onshore (z0 = 1.0 m) – offshore (z0 = 0.0001 m)
unstable (h/L * = -1) – neutral – stable (h/L* = 1)
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
26 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
speed-up of wind speed behind the wind parkmeasurements (Envisat, SAR) at Horns Rev ( 4 km x 5 km)
~20 kmhttp://www.hornsrev.dk/nyheder/brochurer/Horns_Rev_TY.pdf
25. 02. 2003
© ERS SAR/Risø
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
27
© ERS SAR/Risøhttp://galathea3.emu.dk/satelliteeye/projekter/wind/back_uk.html
16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Conclusions 1:
ti l i d fil i t tvertical wind profile important
higher hub heights lead to more power output nocturnal low level jet frequency influences overall power output nocturnal low-level jet frequency influences overall power output for large turbines (hub height more than 80-90 m), logarithmic or power
wind profiles are too simple, turning of the wind becomes important, too
extreme winds important
shut down of turbines shut down of turbines
turbulence important
higher power output higher loads reduced wake effects
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
28 16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Conclusions 2 (wind parks):
wind speed reduction: offshore stronger than onshore
(partial) compensation of higher offshore wind speed offshore requires a larger distance between turbines
larger harvest from wind parks during unstable stratification
offshore: annual cycle of energy production offshore: annual cycle of energy production onshore: diurnal cycle of energy production
offshore wake length is several times larger than onshoreoffshore wake length is several times larger than onshore
offshore requires larger distances between wind parks
but, analytical model is strongly simplified
only for rough estimation, exact simulations with numerical models
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
29
y g ,necessary
16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
l ti f k l dexplanation of wake clouds: mixing fog
12. 02. 2008Photo: Vattenfall/C. Steiness
air directly over the water: 5°C, more than 99% relative humidityair at hub height: -1°C, more than 99% relative humidity
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
30
after mixing: 2°C, above 101% humidity clouds16.03..2011 Prof. Dr. Stefan Emeis – The Physics of Wind Park Optimization
Thank you for your attention
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research –Atmospheric Environmental Research
31