2011-09-14 risk management and operational consequences...ltc einar eliassen. 2011-09-14 risk...

35
2011-09-14 Risk Management and operational consequences 1 Ref: for example project title / unit / yyyy.mm.dd 1 2011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences LTC Einar Eliassen

Upload: others

Post on 20-Apr-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2011-09-14 Risk Management and operational consequences

    1Ref: for example project title / unit / yyyy.mm.dd 12011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    LTC Einar Eliassen

  • 22011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

  • PRESENTATION AIM

    The overall aim of this presentation is to contribute to effective risk management during operations.

    32011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    during operations.

  • SCOPE• Explain the principles of Risk

    Management (RM).• Describe the RM cycle.• Understand the RM ‘rules’.

    42011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    • Understand the RM ‘rules’.• Describe important inputs to assess risk

    “on the road”/traffic safety.• Understand consequences of inadequate

    RM

  • AGENDA• INTRODUCTION.• RISK MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES.• RISK MANAGEMENT CYCLE “THE FIVE STEPS”

    – IDENTIFY RISKS– ASSESS RISKS

    52011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    – ASSESS RISKS– DEVELOP PLANS– IMPLEMENT CONTROLS– MONITOR SITUATION.

    • RISK MANAGEMENT RULES.• ASSESSING RISKS IN TRAFFIC,

    CONSEQUENCES OF INADEQUATE RM• SUMMARY.

  • BACKGROUND - MODEL

    Management

    Foundation

    for

    errors

    Mistakes/

    errors

    Organizational

    factors

    Individual / team actions

    BarriersWork tasks procedures

    62011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    decisions

    Organizational

    processes

    Foundation

    for

    violation

    of rules

    Violation of

    rules

    Protective systems/equip-ment etc.

    Maintenance, org, facilities

    Recourses, knowledge/skills, latent errors

  • SAFETY ROLE IN RISK MANAGEMENT

    • It is usually the responsibility of the G3 or S3 to integrate risk management procedures into every operation.

    • It is a five step process which starts in the

    72011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    • It is a five step process which starts in the planning phase and continues through the process.

    • It is the commander’s responsibilities to execute your risk management activities.

  • SAFETY ROLE IN RISK MANAGEMENT

    Commanders:

    • Ensure battle operating systems function to standard in order to prevent human error, material failures, and reduce adverse.

    82011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    failures, and reduce adverse.

    • Environmental effects.• Establish risk management policy with realistic

    objectives and priorities.

    • Ensure integration of risk management into plans and execution of all operations.

  • SAFETY ROLE IN RISK MANAGEMENT• Make risk decisions at the appropriate level.• Select and enforce control measures for the most

    severe and probable hazards.

    • Evaluate the effects of control measures in reducing

    92011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    • Evaluate the effects of control measures in reducing risks.

    • Determine the effectiveness of control measures and make necessary changes to guidance and controls. ensure that changes are fed back to subordinates as guidance for future missions and SOP’s.

  • SAFETY ROLE IN RISK MANAGEMENTThe unit safety officers responsibility is to:• Assist unit personnel in the conduct of risk

    management.

    • Conduct training in the practice of risk

    102011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    • Conduct training in the practice of risk management.

    • Review risk management applications for lessons learned and improvements.

  • 112011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    DON’T TAKE

    UNNECESSARY

    CHANCES

  • 122011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

  • WHY RISK ASSESSMENT?

    132011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

  • PRINCIPLES (1)

    What is Risk Management? • Risk Management is a logic-based, common

    sense approach to– making decisions regarding the occurrence and

    142011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    – making decisions regarding the occurrence and possible outcomes of future adverse events.

    • Useful decision tool

  • PRINCIPLES (2)

    Why use Risk Management?• It promotes a proactive approach to managing

    risks rather than a reactive response or crisis/consequence management.

    152011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    • Risk Management enables key decision makers to maximise operational capabilities while minimising the risk to the success of the operation

    • Should be driven by the situation NOT the individual!

  • PRINCIPLES (3)

    When to use Risk Management?

    • Whenever the consequence of failure or risk to individuals is unacceptable.

    162011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    Risk Management is not a science; it does not provi de leaders with a precise course of action but it is however a n important decision support tool that can be fully integrated into standard planning procedures.

    individuals is unacceptable.• Singular unusual, complex or dangerous event?• Dangerous or complex process or activity that extends

    over a long period of time.

  • THE CHALLENGING BALANCE

    172011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    SafetyRisk

    Risk assessments

    Standards, manuals, regulations, rules, SOPs etc

  • THE RISK MANAGEMENT CYCLE

    Identify Risks

    (STEP 1) Assess Monitor

    182011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    Assess Risks

    (STEP 2)

    Develop Plans

    (STEP 3)

    Implement Controls(STEP 4)

    Monitor Situation(STEP 5)

  • STEP 1 – IDENTIFY RISKS

    Techniques:

    Key decision makers and participants must look to i dentify any events or conditions that may impact and reduce the capabi lity to accomplish the assigned tasks or that might impair or prevent the desired objectives being reached

    192011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    • Brainstorming• Risk Interviews• Expert Opinion• Historical Analysis• Personal Experience• Wide level of input• Common understanding of

    issues

  • STEP 2 – ASSESS RISKS (1)

    Mishap probabilityLikely Probably May Unlikely

    4 3 2 1

    EXAMPLE

    202011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    4 3 2 1

    Severity

    Critical 4 EXTREME HIGH MED

    Serious 3 HIGH MED MED

    Moderate 2 HIGH MEDLOW

    Minor 1 MED MED

  • STEP 2 – ASSESS RISKS (2)

    Decide the scores then rate the Risks as follows:• GREENGREEN – The risk is manageable within current means and capabilities, no further action required.

    212011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    capabilities, no further action required.• AMBERAMBER –– The risk is manageable within current means and capabilities, but must be continually monitored.• REDRED – The probability or the impact are too high. Action must be taken to either reduce the probability of occurrenc e or the likely impact.• BLACKBLACK – The risk has both a probability that is too high a nd impact which is too great. Action must be taken to both re duce the probability of occurrence and the likely impact.

  • 222011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

  • STEP 3 – DEVELOP PLANS (1)

    •• ELIMINATEELIMINATE – Action is taken to ensure that either the

    No operation or event will ever be risk free!Key decision makers must take steps to eliminate unnecessary risk or to at least take steps to manag e those risks that cannot be eliminated.

    232011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    •• ELIMINATEELIMINATE – Action is taken to ensure that either the risk cannot happen or if it does it has no relevant impact.

    •• REDUCEREDUCE – Action is taken to proactively reduce the probability of the risk occurring.

    •• MITIGATEMITIGATE – Action is taken by putting plans in place that will lessen the impact of the risk if it does occur.

  • STEP 3 – DEVELOP PLANS (2)•• TRANSFERTRANSFER – If possible, the risk can be transferred to

    somebody else who is better placed to either mitigate or accept the risk. Such transfer should not take place if there is NOT a confidence that the risk will be dealt with appropriately.

    242011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    •• ACCEPTACCEPT – If the risk has a low rating GREEN/AMBER it maybe possible to accept the risk and take no further action. A risk may also be accepted if the action planned required to mitigate or transfer the risk has a greater impact than if the risk actually occurred

  • STEP 4 – IMPLEMENT CONTROLS

    • Integrated into existing plans and training requirements.

    Key decision makers must establish controls that eliminate, reduce risks or mitigate their effects.

    252011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    requirements.• All staff (i.e. G-3, S-3) are aware of the

    potential risks and the control measures of risks.

    • When a countermeasure is implemented, care must be taken that new secondary risks are not created as a subsequence.

  • STEP 5 – MONITOR SITUATION

    – Enforce controls and working practices

    For successful implementation, regular reviews of t he current situation and associated risks are required .

    262011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    – Review at regular intervals or after significant events

    – Develop new plans and actions

    – Implement them!

  • Inadequate Risk Management?

    272011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

  • RISK MANAGEMENT RULES - SUMMARY

    • Integrate Risk Management into the planning process.

    • Make risk decisions at the appropriate level.

    282011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    level.• Be proactive, not reactive, communicate,

    think and plan ahead.• Accept no unnecessary risks.

  • BREAK

    292011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

  • ASSESSING RISKS – ROAD SAFETY

    • Safety management system is implemented• Use the same 5-step model as described:

    – Step 1: Identify/look for hazards.– Step 2: Decide who might be harmed.

    302011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    – Step 2: Decide who might be harmed.– Step 3: Evaluate the risk and decide whether

    existing precautions are adequate or more should be done.

    – Step 4: Record your findings.– Step 5: Review your assessment and revise it if

    necessary.

  • EVALUATE THE RISKS (1)

    • The driver– Competency -are you satisfied that your drivers

    are competent and capable of doing their work in a way that is safe for them and other soldiers, officers and civilians?

    312011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    soldiers, officers and civilians?– Training - are you satisfied that your drivers are

    properly trained?– Fitness and health - are you satisfied that your

    drivers are physically and mentally fit to drive safely and not put themselves or others at risk?

  • • The vehicle– Suitability - are you satisfied that vehicles are fit for the

    purpose for which they are used?– Condition - are you satisfied that vehicles are

    maintained in a safe and fit condition?– Safety equipment - are you satisfied that safety

    EVALUATE THE RISKS (2)

    322011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    – Safety equipment - are you satisfied that safety equipment is properly fitted and maintained?

    – Safety critical information - Are you satisfied that drivers have access to information that will help them reduce risks?

    – Ergonomic considerations - Are you satisfied that drivers’ health, and possibly safety, is not being put at risk, i.e. from inappropriate seating position or driving posture?

  • EVALUATE THE RISKS (3)• The operation

    – Routes - do you plan routes thoroughly?– Scheduling - are operations schedules, plans etc

    realistic?– Time - are you satisfied that sufficient time is allowed

    332011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    – Time - are you satisfied that sufficient time is allowed to complete operations safely?

    – Distance - are you satisfied that drivers will not be put at risk from fatigue caused by driving excessive distances without appropriate breaks?

    – Weather conditions - are you satisfied that sufficient consideration is given to adverse weather conditions, such as snow or high winds, when planning operations?

  • OPERATIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF INADEQUATE RISK MANAGEMENT

    • Accidents and mishaps will occur.• Reduced efficiency, waste of time, money and other

    resources.• Operations will fail or be unsuccessful.• Days lost due to injury or failure.

    342011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    • Days lost due to injury or failure.• Risk of work-related ill health.• Stress and reduced morale.• Increased need for investigation and paperwork.• Lost time due to work rescheduling.• Vehicles unserviceable.• Increased running costs due to inadequate driving

    standards.

  • SUMMARY• Commanders initiative and commitment!• Integrate the RM-cycle in all planning

    procedures.

    352011-09-14 Risk assessment and operational consequences

    procedures.• Train RM on appropriate levels.• Know the RM-principles and USE RM

    whenever necessary!