2011-12-23 rothstein scott pm

123
7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614 (954) 525- 2221 United Reporting, Inc. Page 107 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: 09-34791-RBR Chapter 11 ________________________________________________________ In Re: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A. Herb Stettin, Chapter 11 Trustee Plaintiff, vs. RL Pearson and Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation, Defendant. ________________________________________________________ DEPOSITION OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN Volume II of II Taken on behalf of the Chapter 11 Trustee DATE TAKEN: Friday, December 23, 2011 TIME: 10:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m. PLACE: James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building 99 Northeast Fourth Street Courtroom 11-3 Miami, Florida 33128 Examination of the witness taken before: Terri Wright United Reporting, Inc. 1218 Southeast Third Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954)525-2221

Upload: matthendley

Post on 03-Oct-2014

511 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 107

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: 09-34791-RBR Chapter 11 ________________________________________________________

In Re: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A.

Herb Stettin, Chapter 11 Trustee Plaintiff,

vs.

RL Pearson and Associates, Inc., a Florida corporation,

Defendant.________________________________________________________

DEPOSITION OF

SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN

Volume II of II

Taken on behalf of the Chapter 11 Trustee

DATE TAKEN: Friday, December 23, 2011 TIME: 10:30 a.m. - 12:45 p.m. PLACE: James Lawrence King Federal Justice Building 99 Northeast Fourth Street Courtroom 11-3 Miami, Florida 33128

Examination of the witness taken before:

Terri Wright United Reporting, Inc. 1218 Southeast Third Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954)525-2221

Page 2: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 108

1 APPEARANCES FOR SCOTT ROTHSTEIN:

2 LAW OFFICE OF MARC S. NURIK 1 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700

3 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 BY: MARC S. NURIK, ESQUIRE

4APPEARANCES FOR THE CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE,

5 HERBERT STETTIN:

6 BERGER SINGERMAN 350 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000

7 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 BY: CHARLES H. LICHTMAN, ESQUIRE

8 GENOVESE, JOBLOVE & BATTISTA, P.A.

9 100 Southeast 2nd Street, Suite 4400 Miami, Florida 33131

10 By: JOHN. H. GENOVESE, ESQUIRE DAVID C. CIMO, ESQUIRE

11 THERESA M.B. VAN VLIET, ESQUIRE JESUS SUAREZ, ESQUIRE

12APPEARANCES FOR RAZORBACK:

13 CONRAD & SCHERER, LLP

14 633 South Federal Highway, Eighth Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33302

15 BY: WILLIAM R. SCHERER, ESQUIRE ERIC RAYMAN, ESQUIRE

16 IVAN J. KOPAS, ESQUIRE

17 KOZYAK, TROPIN & THROCKMORTON, P.A. 2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard, Ninth Floor

18 Coral Gables, Florida 33134 BY: HARLEY S. TROPIN, ESQUIRE

19APPEARANCES FOR THE US GOVERNMENT:

20 500 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700

21 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394 BY: LAWRENCE LAVECCHIO, ESQUIRE

22

23

24

25

Page 3: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 109

1 APPEARANCES FOR PLATINUM PARTNERS VALUE ARBITRAGE CENTURION STRUCTURED GROWTH, LLC:

2 GOLDSTEIN, TANEN & TRENCH, P.A.

3 One Biscayne Tower, Suite 3700 Two South Biscayne Boulevard

4 Miami, Florida 33131 By: SUSAN E. TRENCH, ESQUIRE

5 CURTIS, MALLET-PREVOST, COLD & MOSLE LLP

6 101 Park Avenue New York, NY 10178-0061

7 BY: ELIOT LAUER, ESQUIRE GABRIEL HERTZBERG, ESQUIRE

8APPEARANCES FOR LEVINSON'S JEWELERS:

9 KOPELOWITZ OSTROW FERGUSON WEISELBERG KEECHL

10 200 Southwest 1st Avenue, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 333012073

11 BY: JAN ATLAS, ESQUIRE BART A. HOUSTON, ESQUIRE

12APPEARANCES FOR THE COMMITTEE OF

13 UNSECURED CREDITORS:

14 AKERMAN, SENTERFITT One Southeast Third Avenue, 25th Floor

15 Miami, Florida 33131-1704 BY: MICHAEL GOLDBERG, ESQUIRE

16 JONATHAN S. ROBBINS, ESQUIRE

17 APPEARANCES FOR T.D. BANK:

18 GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A. 401 East Las Olas Blvd, Suite 2000

19 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 BY: HOLLY SKOLNICK, ESQUIRE

20 DONNA EVANS, ESQUIRE MARK P. SCHNAPP, ESQUIE

21APPEARANCES FOR RLI ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY,

22 COLUMBIA INC. & ZURICH INSURANCE:

23 CLAUSIN MILLER One Chase Manhattan Plaza, 39th Floor

24 New York, New York 10005 BY: SCOTT L. SCHMOOKLER, ESQUIRE

25

Page 4: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 110

1 APPEARANCES FOR FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY:

2 ALEX HOFRICHTER, P.A. 1430 South Dixie Highway, Suite 204

3 Coral Gables, Florida 331463127 BY: ALEX HOFRICHTER, ESQUIRE

4APPEARANCES FOR MORSES:

5 TRIPP SCOTT, P.A.

6 110 Southeast Sixth Street, 15th Floor Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

7 By: JOHN M. MULLIN, ESQUIRE GEORGE WALKER, ESQUIRE

8 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERTA DEUTSCH

9 2499 Glades Road, Suite 110 Boca Raton, Floridan 33431

10 BY: ROBERTA M. DEUTSCH, ESQUIRE

11 APPEARANCES FOR EMESS CAPITAL, LLC:

12 KLUGER KAPLAN SILVERMAN, KATZEN & LEVINE, PL 201 South Biscayne Boulevard, 17th Floor

13 Miami, Florida 331314 BY: CASEY H. CUSICK, ESQUIRE

14APPEARANCES FOR ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE:

15 MILLS PASKERT DIVERS P.A.

16 100 North Tampa Street, Suite 2010 Tampa, Florida 336025145

17 BY: JAMES A. BLACK, JR., ESQUIRE

18 APPEARANCES FOR ROSANNE CARETSKY:

19 BILLING COCHRAN LYLES 515 East Las Olas Blvd, 6th Floor

20 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 333012296 BY: TUCKER CRAIG, ESQUIRE

21 DANIEL S. GELBER, ESQUIRE

22 APPEARANCES FOR FEPICT, MS GROUP:

23 NYSTROM, BECKMAN & PARIS One Marina Park Drive, 15th Floor

24 Boston, MA 02210 BY: JACK SEIGAL, ESQUIRE

25

Page 5: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 111

1 APPEARANCES FOR MICHAEL SZANFRANKSI:

2 LYDECKER, DIAZ 1221 Brickell Avenue, 19th Floor

3 Miami, Florida 33131 BY: CHRISTOPHER G. BERGA, ESQUIRE

4 MIGUEL J. CHAMORRO, ESQUIRE

5 APPEARANCES FOR GIBRALTAR:

6 STEARNS WEAVER MILLER, et al. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200

7 Miami, Florida 331301545 BY: MARY BARZEE-FLORES, ESQ.

8 MATTHEW DATES, ESQUIRE

9 APPEARANCES FOR FRANK PREVE:

10 PODHURST ORSEK 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800

11 Miami, Florida 331301720 BY: RAMON A. RASCO, ESQUIRE

12APPEARANCES FOR FRANK SPINOSA:

13 SCHLESINGER AND COTZEN, P.L.

14 799 Brickell Plaza, Suite 700 Miami, Florida 33131

15 BY: MICHAEL J. SCHLESINGER, ESQUIRE and MICHAEL COTZEN, ESQUIRE

16 SAMUEL J. RABIN, JR., P.A.

17 SAMUEL J. RABIN, JR., ESQUIRE 799 Brickell Plaza

18 Suite 606 Miami, Florida 33131

19APPEARANCES FOR MURRAY HUBERFELD AND DAVID BODNER & MARK

20 NORDLICHT:

21 HARVEY WERBLOWSKY, ESQUIRE

22

23

24

25

Page 6: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 112

1 EXAMINATION INDEX

2 PAGESCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN

3 CONTINUED DIRECT BY MR. LICHTMAN 113

4 CROSS BY MR. FERGUSON 124 CROSS BY MR. HOUSTON 197 197

5

6 EXHIBIT INDEX

7 PAGETRUSTEE'S

8 10 E-mail dated 5/14/09 113

9 11 E-mail dated 10/29/11 116

10 12 E-mail dated 6/19/09 119

11 13 E-mail dated 6/22/09 120

12 14 E-mail dated 6/23/09 122

13 15 E-mail dated 9/15/09 123

14 16 E-mail dated 10/28/09 150

15 17 E-mail dated 8/14/09 169

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 7: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 113

1 CONTINUED QUESTIONING

2 (Whereupon, Trustee's Exhibit No. 10 was marked

3 for identification.)

4 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

5 Q Back on the record.

6 Mr. Rothstein, I am showing you what's been

7 marked as Exhibit 10. It's an e-mail from Boden to

8 himself and you dated May 14, 2009. Do you see that?

9 A Hold on a second.

10 Q I really need you to just focus on the first

11 page of the e-mail.

12 A Okay.

13 Q If you take a look at the middle section of the

14 page, it's an e-mail from Boden to you of May 13, the

15 day before. You see that?

16 A I've seen this before, yes, sir.

17 Q Now, just read to yourself or you can read out

18 loud, I don't care, the first paragraph.

19 A Of David's e-mail to me?

20 Q Yes. The May 13, in the middle of the page.

21 A Okay. Here we go. Deal is 800k, ROI 400k paid

22 over five months. Deal is papered at 900k to JCVV

23 Investments, LLC, a Delaware liability company. The

24 difference is being paid to R.L. Pearson and Associates.

25 Q What does that tell you?

Page 8: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 114

1 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

2 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

3 Q What did you understand from that?

4 MR. HOUSTON: Same objection.

5 THE WITNESS: That he had sold a deal where

6 JCVV Investments were the investor and the R.L.

7 Pearson and Associates was taking $100,000.

8 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

9 Q How do you come to the conclusion that

10 Mr. Pearson was taking a $100,000?

11 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

12 THE WITNESS: Because they took - the deal was

13 800, 400. They wanted the paper to reflect 900,000

14 and they wanted that difference paid to R.L.

15 Pearson and Associates.

16 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

17 Q Do you know if that fact was disclosed to JCVV

18 Investments, meaning the $100,000 that Pearson was

19 getting?

20 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

21 THE WITNESS: I don't believe it ever was. In

22 reviewing the e-mail traffic, there was what I'll

23 call a CYA letter created from the fake plaintiff

24 that Boden and Pearson created, that was a fake

25 plaintiff letter saying that she agreed to give the

Page 9: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 115

1 $100,000 to R.L. Pearson.

2 But in reviewing e-mail traffic recently over

3 the last several weeks, it's clear from the traffic

4 that that was just a CYA letter that was put in the

5 file. That was never actually furnished as part of

6 the deal packets to the investors.

7 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

8 Q Of course there was no real investor?

9 A No, there's a real investor.

10 Q Excuse me, I mean a real plaintiff.

11 A No, no real plaintiff.

12 Q At the top of the e-mail it says: Deal needs

13 to be papered at the 910k. I went off the earlier

14 version Richie had sent but it is 910k, not 900k. Do

15 you see that?

16 A Yes.

17 Q What does that tell you?

18 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

19 THE WITNESS: They're changing it again.

20 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

21 Q Okay. To do what?

22 A To increase their take by another $10,000 from

23 the investor.

24 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

25 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

Page 10: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 116

1 Q I'm going to jump out of sequence because we're

2 getting short on time and there are some exhibits I

3 really want to get in the record. Forgive me for that.

4 Okay.

5 I would like for you to take a look at

6 Exhibit 11, which is dated October 29, 2009, at the

7 top. It's from David Boden to yourself. Do you see

8 that?

9 A I do.

10 (Whereupon, Trustee's Exhibit No. 11 was marked

11 for identification.)

12 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

13 Q And October 29th was probably your last day

14 before you left for Morocco; is that a fair statement?

15 A No. I was in Morocco.

16 Q You were in Morocco by then?

17 A I was.

18 Q Okay. Are you familiar with this e-mail?

19 A I am.

20 Q Tell me what your understanding of this e-mail

21 was trying to generally relate to.

22 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

23 MR. LICHTMAN: Hearsay?

24 MR. HOUSTON: Yes.

25 THE WITNESS: It's more of the insanity that

Page 11: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 117

1 was going on as I was scrambling around in Morocco

2 to decide what to do with myself.

3 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

4 Q Okay. You'll see this pertains to Pearson and

5 Boden and the sub-Ponzi. What was the relationship of

6 this document?

7 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

8 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

9 Q Did you understand my question?

10 A Yeah, I had asked, much as I did with other

11 investors, I was trying to figure out how much money I

12 would need to put together to make the investors whole

13 not including their fake interest payments. And David's

14 writing to me and telling me how much is due each of the

15 people.

16 Q At the third entry down you'll see an entry of

17 October 29, 2009, 3:01 p.m. You write this to Boden.

18 It says, Subject, data request. Do you see that?

19 A I do.

20 Q Would you read that for the record.

21 A Thanks, love ya, Scott. Rich better hope I fix

22 this or his little profit scheme will be public, not

23 good.

24 Q Who do you mean by Rich?

25 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

Page 12: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 118

1 THE WITNESS: Richard Pearson.

2 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

3 Q What do you mean by when you said, Rich better

4 hope I fix this or his little profit scheme will be

5 public, not good?

6 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

7 THE WITNESS: The additional funds he was

8 stealing from the investors with Boden, and by

9 increasing the deal amounts.

10 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

11 Q And when Boden wrote back to you, it looks

12 like -- Well, 15:02, I don't know because of the time

13 zone change the way it worked on your Blackberry or

14 whatever you were faxing from - Boden wrote back to

15 you: How was the progress? I'm fixing, going.

16 Do you know what Boden meant by that?

17 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

18 THE WITNESS: I don't know what he was thinking

19 at the moment, probably very concerned that I was

20 not in the country anymore and wanted to know what

21 I was doing to make everything better.

22 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

23 Q Did you --

24 A I'm guessing what was going on in his head at

25 the time.

Page 13: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 119

1 Q Did you speak with Boden once you left the

2 country?

3 A I don't have an independent recollection

4 whether I did one way or the other. You have to check

5 my cell phone records.

6 Q You wrote back: Medium to poor.

7 Do you see that?

8 A Yes.

9 Q He wrote, Let me know if I can help?

10 A Yes.

11 Q Did you ever call on him to help you anymore?

12 A I don't know if I ever called him at all to

13 help him. And I don't recall whether I wrote to him or

14 not. You have to look at the traffic.

15 Q Would it be a fair statement that from the time

16 you left Morocco, to the best of your recollection, you

17 had no communications with him even to present day?

18 A From the time that I left for Morocco to right

19 now, to the best of my recollection, I've had -- I can

20 tell you from the time I came back from Morocco I've had

21 absolutely no contact with him other than this e-mail

22 traffic. I don't know if I had any other contact with

23 him while I was actually in Morocco.

24 (Whereupon, Trustee's Exhibit No. 12 was marked

25 for identification.)

Page 14: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 120

1 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

2 Q Showing what's been marked as Exhibit 12, it's

3 an e-mail dated June 19, 2009. It's actually an e-mail

4 chain from June 18. The bottom are actually other

5 days. I want you to just focus on the first page.

6 A Okay.

7 Q The e-mail that you wrote to Boden of June 19,

8 3:01 p.m., do you see that?

9 A Yes.

10 Q This is backwards, it's fund 250, get back 375

11 in three months. No one is going to fund 125 and make

12 250. Is he high?

13 Do you know what that pertains to?

14 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

15 THE WITNESS: I don't remember. It appears to

16 be just a screw up in signals on deals.

17 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

18 Q Take a look at the top portion. Does that

19 refresh your recollection?

20 A He's -- it's just correcting of a deal.

21 (Trustee's Exhibit No. 13 was marked for

22 identification.)

23 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

24 Q Okay. Showing you Exhibit 13, June 22, 2009,

25 is from Boden to you. In the middle portion is the

Page 15: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 121

1 e-mail from before.

2 A Okay.

3 Q You just saw Exhibit 12, which is that middle

4 section?

5 A Right.

6 Q Exhibit 13, the top portion of the e-mail

7 says: These guys are here at 11, fund 300, get back 375

8 in three months, difference is fee to Pearson.

9 Do you know what that means?

10 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

11 THE WITNESS: It's the bump. It's from the 250

12 to 300, they are increasing the deal amount to

13 steal the money from the investor.

14 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

15 Q If you could be more specific what you're

16 saying there.

17 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

18 THE WITNESS: Yes. The deal was out there at

19 fund 250, get back 375. On this deal they changed

20 it to fund 300, get back 375. So they increased it

21 by $50,000.

22 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

23 Q What was your understanding of where the

24 $50,000 went?

25 A It was going to Pearson.

Page 16: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 122

1 Q How do you know that?

2 A Because we sent it to him and they told me to

3 send it to him.

4 (Trustee's Exhibit No. 14 was marked for

5 identification.)

6 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

7 Q Let's do this quick. Take a look at

8 Exhibit 14. You don't have to worry about the second

9 page. It's an e-mail dated June 23 from you to Boden

10 regarding the Houtkin deal.

11 A Yes.

12 Q The paragraph says: David, give me the exact

13 terms of the deal as Rich wants them papered. If he is

14 asking the deal to be funded at 700k over, I need to

15 reduce the ROI by that number; otherwise, I am paying

16 the 700k back twice, once to Rich and once to the

17 funder.

18 Explain what you meant there.

19 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

20 THE WITNESS: I don't really recall. It looks

21 like the way that he's trying to restructure the

22 deal to take his money would have ended up costing

23 me money as opposed to making money for the Ponzi

24 scheme.

25 MR. LICHTMAN: Because we're running out of

Page 17: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 123

1 time, we're going to take time for us to swamp out

2 positions. I'm going to stop after this next

3 exhibit.

4 (Whereupon, Trustee's Exhibit No. 15 was marked

5 for identification.)

6 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

7 Q This is 15. Showing you what's been marked as

8 Exhibit 15, it's an e-mail from Boden to Debra and you

9 regarding new deal. If you would read into the record

10 the e-mail.

11 A Yes. It says: New deal, Platinum Estates

12 Incorporated -- It's from David Boden to Debra and I.

13 Platinum Estates Incorporated, party to P6 documents, is

14 taking another deal. It is the 800k, ROI of 600k in

15 four months. The deal should be papered at 1 million

16 with ROI of 400k and fee to R.L. Pearson to 200k.

17 Q Stop there. What are those two sentences --

18 what do those two sentence tell you?

19 A Tells me that David and Richard have increased

20 the funding amount for their funding source by $200,000

21 so that they can steal the money.

22 Q And then if you would read the last sentence,

23 starting with, "please."

24 A Please use the same documents from P6 except

25 that this is a whistle blower case, not sexual

Page 18: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 124

1 harassment for purposes of the settlement agreement.

2 Q Doesn't that tell you when you see Boden write

3 to you that this is a whistle blower case, not a sexual

4 harassment case, that he affirmatively knew that that

5 could not be a real case?

6 MR. HOUSTON: Objection.

7 THE WITNESS: Yes.

8 BY MR. LICHTMAN:

9 Q Okay. Is there --

10 A That's what it says to me.

11 Q Anything else you would like to expand on that

12 answer?

13 MR. HOUSTON: Same objection.

14 THE WITNESS: No. He's changing the kind of

15 case it is. Without seeing the paperwork I can't

16 tell you anything else. Since he's using the same

17 deal as another deal, changing the type of case it

18 is, it seems to scream that he knows that this is

19 fake.

20 MR. LICHTMAN: Okay. I'm done a couple minutes

21 early so we can switch out and keep moving.

22 CROSS EXAMINATION

23 BY MR. FERGUSON:

24 Q Scott, how are you doing?

25 A Good, David.

Page 19: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 125

1 Q I want to pick up with this Exhibit 15 that we

2 left off with.

3 A Hang on a second.

4 Q Sure.

5 A Got it.

6 Q Is Richard Pearson on that?

7 A No, sir.

8 Q And it's coming from your right-hand guy who

9 helped you work this scam and particularly paper the

10 files; is that right?

11 A Yes. David was integrally involved in the

12 Ponzi and he ran the sub-Ponzi with Mr. Pearson.

13 Q And he was your right-hand guy long before

14 Pearson came along; is that right?

15 A He was.

16 Q In fact, Pearson comes along in April of '09

17 and lasts until you flee to Morocco the end of October;

18 is that right?

19 A Yes.

20 Q So, he literally walked into this the last six

21 months of the scheme imploding?

22 A Yes.

23 Q And when you met him to talk about funding in

24 April, I'm assuming because you said you were lying to

25 him in the beginning, you didn't disclose to him,

Page 20: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 126

1 Welcome to a Ponzi scheme, We're in full alarm, all -

2 it's melt-down and we need your money. You didn't

3 introduce him to the scheme like that?

4 A No, I didn't introduce anyone to the scheme

5 that way.

6 Q Understood. And that Exhibit 15, that

7 Exhibit 15, Scott, you don't know as you sit here today

8 whether Pearson knew of the contents of that e-mail

9 between you and Boden, do you?

10 A I know he had to have been given the

11 documents. I can't tell you whether he read them.

12 Q I'm talking about the contents of the e-mail

13 itself.

14 A I have no way of knowing one way or the other.

15 Q When Boden, your right-hand guy, who's

16 intimately familiar with the deal flow and the paperwork

17 says, We're going to use the same as the prior deal but

18 this one is whistle blower, not sexual harassment, you

19 don't know if Pearson was aware of that communication to

20 you?

21 A I do not know that, no, sir.

22 Q And also you talked about these plaintiff

23 letters. What I understand is, was there -- was a

24 document generated purporting to authorize fees taken by

25 Pearson and Boden, the plaintiff was authorizing fees in

Page 21: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 127

1 in certain instances; is that right?

2 A There was no plaintiff. They --

3 Q Purporting to --

4 A They were -- yes. That the plaintiff was

5 purportedly authorizing a fee to R.L. Pearson.

6 Q And that document, to your knowledge, was

7 created by Boden; is that right?

8 A I don't know which one of them created it. I

9 would certainly imagine, David, that it was Mr. Boden.

10 Q Probably in RRA's office on your server?

11 A Yes, I'm certain the records would show that.

12 Q Do you have any knowledge that Pearson, as you

13 sit here today, that Pearson knew that the client

14 authorizations of the fee were false?

15 A Say that again.

16 Q Do you have any knowledge as you sit here today

17 that Pearson knew for a fact there were no plaintiffs?

18 A I never told him there were no real

19 plaintiffs. I never said, Rich, there's no real

20 plaintiffs.

21 Q In fact, I'm going to show you an e-mail in a

22 minute at the end when you're in Morocco where you're

23 still telling him to be cool and talking about

24 plaintiffs, that you don't want to lose plaintiffs.

25 So, to be clear, you never dropped the veil to

Page 22: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 128

1 Pearson and said there are no plaintiffs?

2 A I never said to Pearson directly, There are no

3 plaintiffs. There were loads of indications there were

4 no plaintiffs.

5 Q But you can't testify --

6 A I never said that -- so we're clear,

7 Mr. Ferguson - the only reason I'm not calling you David

8 back is because we're talking about David Boden, and I

9 don't want you to suddenly get arrested.

10 Q Fair enough. I'll stick with my last name.

11 But it's fine if you call me David. I'm sure

12 the record will be clear. I'm here right now for this

13 purpose only.

14 A I didn't say to very many people who ultimately

15 were involved, There are no plaintiffs. As a matter of

16 fact, the only person I remember using those exact words

17 were was Michael Szafranski.

18 Q Understood. What I'm trying to determine right

19 now, looking at Exhibit 15, as you sit here today,

20 there's no way for you to testify that you were aware

21 that Richard Pearson knew there were no plaintiffs?

22 A That's a different question. I can absolutely

23 testify that he knew there were no real plaintiffs.

24 Q How did he know?

25 A He knew there was no money in the bank

Page 23: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 129

1 accounts.

2 Q Pearson did?

3 A Pearson knew.

4 Q How did he know that? I have to go with you

5 point by point.

6 A Because Boden was talking to him about the fact

7 that money needed to be transferred at the last minute

8 to fund these deals.

9 Q But, when Boden is telling him that, are you

10 witnessing him telling him that?

11 A Not all the time, no, sir.

12 Q How do you know Pearson doesn't take that to

13 mean that an account needs money moved into it as

14 opposed to this thing is a Ponzi scheme and there are no

15 plaintiffs?

16 A Let me give you some direct examples, it will

17 be easier, instead of talking in generalities.

18 Rich is asking me questions from time to time

19 about wanting to see plaintiffs. I'm saying, You have

20 to talk to Boden. Okay. He says to Boden in front of

21 me at Bova, one time we were just down there hanging

22 out - you certainly don't have the kind of foot traffic

23 in your office - he was joking - have the foot traffic

24 in your office that you would for all these deals. I

25 brushed it off. I tried not to engage in it. Probably

Page 24: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 130

1 the most telling thing --

2 Q I want to get to the most telling thing. Stop

3 right there at that point.

4 A Sure.

5 Q You're at Bova. He's questioning the foot

6 traffic. Are you taking that to mean that he knows that

7 there are no plaintiffs or is he inquiring, Where are

8 they?

9 A No. It was joking.

10 Q But, are you purporting to know at that moment

11 that that statement was a revelation by him to you that

12 he was aware that there are are no plaintiffs as opposed

13 to questioning?

14 A The revelation was when I was scolding him

15 about the lies he was telling the investors. When he

16 told his investors that we had this Big Four accounting

17 firm checking it out. And I had to yell at him saying,

18 You're running the risk of blowing this whole thing up.

19 Stop lying to bring these people in. We have enough

20 issues. You're just increasing potential increased due

21 diligence. When I found out he was saying that he had

22 access to our banking information --

23 Q 24 hour --

24 A 24 hour access, something along those lines.

25 Q Who did he say that to?

Page 25: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 131

1 A I don't recall. It's in the e-mail traffic.

2 Q Do you know whether or not he believed that

3 Boden did have access to those accounts 24 hours? Do

4 you know one way or the other?

5 A I have no way of knowing that, no.

6 Q Is it possible that he thought Boden did have

7 access to those balances 24 hours a day?

8 A It is possible.

9 Q Boden was making money off of what you're

10 calling and Chuck is calling the Pearson/Boden

11 sub-Ponzi; is that right?

12 A Yes.

13 Q To be clear, a Ponzi scheme is in broad terms

14 getting new investors, using their money to pay old

15 investors what you promised them, correct?

16 A Yes.

17 Q Without disclosing to any of the investors that

18 that's what you're doing?

19 A Correct.

20 Q When is the first time you ever heard the term

21 sub-Ponzi? Did you hear it prior to any conversation

22 with Chuck Lichtman or reading the Complaint against

23 David Boden, if you read it?

24 A I did.

25 Q When is the first time you heard it?

Page 26: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 132

1 A In conversations I had with someone else.

2 Q Okay.

3 A Two years ago.

4 Q And to be clear, Pearson and Boden to the

5 extent that any investors came in through them, they did

6 not control those investors' funds, Pearson or Boden,

7 you took control of it?

8 A I had ultimate control. Boden had access.

9 Q Boden had access to all of this information for

10 the entire Ponzi scheme from you, didn't he?

11 A The bulk of it, sure.

12 Q But, it's not as if there was a Ponzi scheme

13 being run by Boden and Pearson by which their investors'

14 money was coming in to pay their old investors' money?

15 A Can you say that again.

16 MR. LICHTMAN: Form.

17 BY MR. FERGUSON:

18 Q It's not as if Pearson and Boden had a pool of

19 money by which they controlled and they could pay their

20 old investors with their new investors' money?

21 A No. Their money, their Ponzi money was

22 commingled with all the other Ponzi money.

23 Q And used just like all other investors in this

24 Ponzi scheme; is that right?

25 A Yes.

Page 27: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 133

1 Q So, really when you're characterizing their

2 involvement in this as a sub-ponzi and going along with

3 that characterization, it's not based on the payment of

4 old investors with new investors' money, which is the

5 classic definition of a Ponzi, it's based upon your

6 characterization of their front-end work bringing the

7 money in?

8 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

9 THE WITNESS: It's really -- here's the problem

10 you're going to have. You weren't here for all the

11 testimony.

12 BY MR. FERGUSON:

13 Q Unfortunately, I've read every word of it.

14 I'll do my best to recall.

15 A The way most people who eventually knew this

16 was a scam knew was through continued interaction and

17 seeing the signs. Seeing the things and noticing the

18 things did not exist.

19 One of the most telling things with Pearson

20 was - and this is -- here's the thing, if Pearson was a

21 dummy, which he's not, he's a bright guy, I understand

22 the argument you're making.

23 But think about it this way, this is the big

24 tell, I'm sending him a deal to be papered by some

25 allegedly international or national defendant. They

Page 28: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 134

1 agree to the deal. Within hours all the paperwork is

2 done, executed by the plaintiff, executed by the

3 defendant, redacted and forwarded to Mr. Pearson for

4 sending to his clients, and it happens over and over

5 again. It's a physical impossibility.

6 You and I both know you can't - it just doesn't

7 happen that way. That documents - especially documents

8 of that nature - all get done. He's redoing the

9 amounts.

10 Let's assume he has a legitimate argument for

11 redoing the funding amount, that he's just going to

12 claim that's just some fee that he was taking and he

13 considered it a commission to himself. Well, anyone

14 with even a quarter of a brain would know that I would

15 have to get the real plaintiff, if one existed, to agree

16 to that. When did that happen?

17 They actually told me to take that money. And

18 then in that one e-mail we saw, they increased it again

19 and they changed it to 900 and then they changed it to

20 910,000 --

21 Q Scott --

22 MR. NURIK: Let him finish.

23 THE WITNESS: That's okay.

24 BY MR. FERGUSON:

25 Q We're going into a narrative.

Page 29: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 135

1 A Go ahead.

2 Q Again, though, there were times when a sense of

3 urgency would be communicated to Pearson. I'm going to

4 lose plaintiffs. We have plaintiffs here. This deal

5 needs to go through today. That was part of the scheme;

6 is that right?

7 A I talked to everyone, people in the know and

8 people who were completely innocent. I tried to

9 communicate with everyone the same way in my e-mail

10 traffic.

11 Q And since Boden is controlling your documents,

12 not just for Pearson deals, but all of them, you don't

13 expect that Pearson was coming to your office and

14 getting those deal packets ready, do you?

15 MR.LICHTMAN: Objection to the form.

16 THE WITNESS: No. Boden was only controlling

17 the documents for the Boden/Pearson deal. He

18 wasn't controlling all the documents. That was me,

19 Deb, and other people, Preve.

20 BY MR. FERGUSON:

21 Q Let's back up for a second. When you first

22 encounter Pearson, he's in your building totally

23 unrelated to RRA, right?

24 A Yes.

25 Q In fact, you came to do some legal work for

Page 30: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 136

1 him. You came to his office with a crew of

2 well-respected lawyers to assist him in sending out a

3 letter that he needed to send to the west coast of

4 Florida on an emergency bases to extend a contract.

5 Does that ring a bell?

6 A Yes, Boden had brought him in as a client.

7 Q And at that time you're aware he had what

8 appeared to be some legitimate business deals,

9 refinancing the Las Olas River House for about $6

10 million?

11 A Yes, they appeared to be legitimate to me, yes.

12 Q When he first comes across your radar screen,

13 he appears to be a legitimate businessman with money

14 himself or access to money; fair enough?

15 A Yes.

16 Q A perfect plug-in to your operation?

17 A Yes, sir.

18 Q Fair enough?

19 A Yes, sir.

20 Q In fact, he does come to plug in at the perfect

21 time when you're in an implosion mode in April of '09;

22 correct?

23 A He definitely helped, yes.

24 Q Do you recall how the conversation you had with

25 Boden where we're switching now from Pearson,

Page 31: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 137

1 businessman in building, client of RRA, to a possible

2 investor or source of funds for this operation; do you

3 know when that occurred?

4 A I do not.

5 Q Sometime though around April '09; is that

6 right?

7 A That sounds about right.

8 Q Now, if Pearson were to say that when he

9 brought this up to Boden, because he heard about the

10 opportunity from a third party, Boden acted like he knew

11 nothing about it. Do you know if that's true or not?

12 A Say that again, please.

13 Q Pearson claims that he became alerted to you as

14 something other than a lawyer with a large large law

15 firm in his building and a possible investment

16 opportunity because a third party asked him if he knew

17 about it and showed him some paperwork. Did you ever

18 hear that?

19 A I did.

20 Q And then he in turn showed it to Boden in his

21 office in your building, Pearson's office, and asked

22 about it?

23 A I do recall that, yes, sir.

24 Q According to Pearson at that moment Boden acted

25 like he knew nothing about it but was going to go check

Page 32: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 138

1 with you. Do you know if that occurred?

2 A I have no idea whether it occurred.

3 Q When Boden came to you and said Pearson might

4 be a source of money, did he tell you either way how he

5 reacted to Pearson's questioning about the possible

6 opportunity?

7 A He didn't tell me how he had reacted to the

8 questioning. He asked me what I wanted to do. And I

9 said something to the effect that I don't want anymore

10 small investors at this moment. I'm having enough

11 trouble with what I'm dealing with. That's when David

12 first told me that he was a player.

13 Q Pearson's a player?

14 A I already knew Boden was A player; so, yes,

15 Pearson was a player.

16 Q At that time if Boden had feigned to not know

17 anything about these investments, he would have been

18 lying to Richard Pearson?

19 A Yes, sir.

20 Q Because he, in fact, drafted the Brauser

21 settlement months prior, Boden?

22 A He assisted me in drafting it, yes, sir.

23 Q The scheme was up and running and he was

24 already your right-hand man, Boden, April of '09?

25 A He was my right hand -- he was absolutely my

Page 33: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 139

1 right-hand man. And for the life of me, I can't recall

2 specifically whether he helped me with the Brauser

3 settlement. I seem to remember talking to him about it.

4 Q I did read in your testimony, I know it's been

5 a long 10 days, but you said he had a substantial hand

6 in drafting that document.

7 A My recollection is that he did. I just,

8 without seeing all the e-mail traffic, David, I can't

9 tell you.

10 Q Fair enough. To be clear, as of April, '09,

11 Boden knew full well that there were investments

12 purportedly involving plaintiffs funding?

13 A That's true.

14 Q Earlier you testified when asked how Boden had

15 to know, and I took notes, you said that Boden knows

16 there are no plaintiffs.

17 A Correct.

18 Q He knows there are no defendants.

19 A That's correct.

20 Q The paperwork turned around without appearance

21 of plaintiffs.

22 A Correct.

23 Q No conflict searches?

24 A Correct.

25 Q No files in your office?

Page 34: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 140

1 A Correct.

2 Q No clients coming out of your office?

3 A Correct.

4 Q And no money from legit big defendants?

5 A That's correct.

6 Q Well, now I'm going to go back down that list

7 in reverse order.

8 No money from legit big defendants. Pearson

9 would never have had any way to know that one way or

10 another unless somebody told him, right?

11 A I don't know what he knew in that regard or

12 whether he had access to that.

13 Q He wouldn't have known that there were no

14 conflict searches because he's not an RRA lawyer, he

15 would never be in those --

16 A Again, I can't tell you if he did or not. I

17 can't tell you if him and Boden had these discussions or

18 not.

19 Q I'm going to grant you that if Boden told him

20 all of this, that he would know that; but you don't know

21 whether Boden told him of all these discrepancies or

22 not?

23 A I don't. But you're asking, "he had no way of

24 knowing," and that's not true because he was, to my

25 knowledge from my observation, in bed with Boden.

Page 35: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 141

1 Q Fair enough. But to be clear, when conflict

2 searches went out internally at RRA, Boden wouldn't have

3 been in that loop, so he would have no personal

4 knowledge -- I'm sorry. Pearson wouldn't have been in

5 that loop and would have no personal knowledge of the

6 conflict search activity of RRA absent someone telling

7 him?

8 A I didn't tell him. That I can tell you.

9 Q And you don't know if Boden did?

10 A I have no way of knowing one way or the other.

11 Q What's the proximity of Pearson's office to

12 your office? What floor were you on?

13 A 15, 16 and 22. My office was on 16.

14 Q What floor was Pearson on?

15 A I don't remember.

16 Q How much square footage approximately did you

17 have in the building?

18 A We had a lot. Tens of thousands of square

19 feet.

20 Q Is it fair to say that Pearson wouldn't have

21 been in a position to accurately monitor the foot

22 traffic of individuals in and out of your three floors

23 in that building?

24 A Well, here's the thing, at the time that

25 documents were allegedly being executed, Pearson was

Page 36: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 142

1 frequently in our offices. He was sitting with Boden.

2 So they're sitting in there working a deal, talking to

3 the investor, whatever it is they're doing. I'm seeing

4 him in there. And then documents are coming from

5 Boden's office going to Deb, and shortly thereafter

6 documents going out of Deb's office back into where

7 Pearson and Boden are sitting.

8 So, yes, he would have been in a position to

9 monitor the defendant flying in on a spaceship or the

10 plaintiff suddenly appearing in my office.

11 Q How would he know that they are in another

12 office within one of your three floors and that they are

13 signing? Because this was told to him, that he could

14 never meet or know who the plaintiffs were; is that

15 right? You wouldn't let him meet the plaintiffs, right?

16 MR. LICHTMAN: Object to the form.

17 THE WITNESS: Originally I told him when I was

18 telling him that everything was real, I told him

19 everything is confidential.

20 What Boden told him, again, I wasn't privy to

21 that unless I was sitting in on the conversation.

22 BY MR. FERGUSON:

23 Q But, when he asked to meet the plaintiffs, you

24 flat out told him no and told him to speak to Boden?

25 A Yes.

Page 37: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 143

1 Q Do you know what --

2 A I didn't say no. I said, "Speak to Boden."

3 Q Well, you didn't say yes; you just said, "Speak

4 to Boden"?

5 A Yes.

6 Q Do you know what Boden told him about the

7 reason why he couldn't meet the plaintiffs if that

8 discussion occurred?

9 A I do not.

10 Q Debra, she never took direction from Richard

11 Pearson, did she?

12 A There was some e-mails from Pearson to Deb or

13 maybe from Pearson to Irene, to one or both. So you'd

14 have to look at the e-mail traffic. But there were

15 definitely e-mails from Mr. Pearson to Deb or Irene or

16 both with instructions to do certain things.

17 Q Could Pearson instruct Irene to effectuate a

18 wire?

19 A He attempted to instruct her to initiate a

20 wire.

21 Q Did he have any control --

22 A But she's not going to do it without speaking

23 to me or Boden first.

24 Q Did Pearson have the ability to generate any

25 documents for this deal without Boden?

Page 38: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 144

1 A You'd have to look at his computer.

2 Q Do you know if Pearson generated any paperwork

3 as opposed to Boden doing it all?

4 A I don't. You'd have to check his computer.

5 Q Boden certainly had the ability and knowledge

6 to do it all for both of them, didn't he?

7 A He did, and he had Deb to assist him.

8 Q Do you know whether Boden ever disclosed to

9 Pearson that any of these documents were phony, directly

10 told him that?

11 A The normal documents, no. The finders fee

12 letter, yes.

13 Q Again, the finders fee letter, is that the one

14 that's signed by the purported plaintiffs?

15 A Yes.

16 Q And what hand did he have in those? Explain

17 that.

18 A If Pearson wanted to bump the deals, they

19 bumped the deals. That was Pearson's suggestion to bump

20 the deals.

21 Q And were you there when he suggested it?

22 A No. I got e-mails. There were e-mail traffic

23 that he's on saying saying Rich wants this papered at...

24 Q But, how do you know that he was aware, or

25 maybe you don't, that that document, the plaintiff's

Page 39: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 145

1 letter, was not legitimate?

2 A Very easily. Because if this was legitimate,

3 the e-mails and the instructions from Pearson would have

4 been either to David or to me, Please contact the

5 plaintiff and see if the plaintiff is willing to

6 authorize a finders fee to us in the amount of such and

7 such.

8 They can't just tell me literally, Take a deal

9 and move it from 800 to 900 and expect every single time

10 you do it to have no push back from the plaintiff,

11 plaintiff is just going to agree to it.

12 Q How do you know that he wasn't told by the

13 general counsel of your firm, your right-hand man, your

14 inside guy, Boden, that if they wanted more money Boden

15 was going to handle that and he could get it done and

16 get that document signed?

17 A Because as I testified on direct examination, I

18 directly told Richard Pearson, "Why don't you just

19 increase your finders fee, your internal commission, the

20 thing you're disclosing to them in your PPM? Why are

21 you doing it using this other source? You're adding too

22 many things into the mix."

23 And it was around the same time as the

24 conversations I had with him about the Big Four

25 accounting firm and the access to the on-line banking.

Page 40: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 146

1 Q But if he was in the know at this point, why

2 would he bother to need a plaintiff's -- why would he

3 care if there was a document in the file, of all things,

4 from a non-existent plaintiff authorizing a fee if he

5 was in the know? Couldn't he just say to you, Scott,

6 change the terms of this deal and bump it up a hundred

7 more K because I want it and I've got to split it with

8 your guy?

9 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

10 THE WITNESS: No, because he was doing CYA

11 documents. That's like saying, Why do we need any

12 of these documents? If the parties aren't seeing

13 them, why do we need to create unredacted

14 documents? Why do you need to have deal files?

15 Why do you need to have fake wire documents?

16 BY MR. FERGUSON:

17 Q I thought you said he was a bright guy.

18 MR. LICHTMAN: Are you finished?

19 THE WITNESS: Very bright.

20 BY MR. FERGUSON:

21 Q If he's a bright guy and he wants a CYA letter

22 from a non-existent plaintiff in the file, what good is

23 that going to do? That's like holding a newspaper up in

24 front of a machine gun. What would that document

25 accomplish in this scheme if he was in the know?

Page 41: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 147

1 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

2 THE WITNESS: If you look at the files, his

3 files, you'll see that he never took that document

4 and did anything with it. He stuck it in the

5 file. He was CYA'ing himself.

6 He increased the deal. Do you realize just by

7 the very nature of what he was doing he was lying

8 to his investor. He told his investor that this is

9 the way that deal was being offered, when it was

10 not. He was then instructing us, not asking, paper

11 the deal at this amount.

12 No real investment anywhere on the planet works

13 that way. It just doesn't work that way. You know

14 that and I know that, and Pearson absolutely knew

15 that.

16 BY MR. FERGUSON:

17 Q You're now getting inside of his head and

18 you're saying you know what he is thinking as opposed to

19 if he thought that there were plaintiffs and that Boden,

20 your general counsel, was getting them to authorize

21 money off of their side.

22 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

23 THE WITNESS: There's no e-mail traffic asking

24 Boden to get authorization from anyone. There's

25 nothing where he ever talked to Boden ever, or me

Page 42: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 148

1 for that matter, saying, Do you think we could bump

2 the deals?

3 I mean, if this is a real investment, a bright

4 guy like Pearson is going to know before you change

5 something in some of these deals by $200,000, you

6 might want to clue somebody in.

7 No. He's just automatically doing it. Paper

8 it this amount. Paper it that amount. Reduce the

9 ROI to this. Increase the ROI to that. The same

10 deal over and over and over again, plaintiff after

11 plaintiff. It makes no sense.

12 BY MR. FERGUSON:

13 Q Let me ask you this because I need to focus.

14 You know, if I had all day I could probably go into a

15 lot more than I'm going to be able to. And I understand

16 the "should have known" concept, and there's plenty of

17 us here that understand should have known and if it

18 requires standing up in front of a jury and a judge

19 they're going to make their case.

20 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

21 Is that a question?

22 MR. FERGUSON: It's coming. I promise.

23 BY MR. FERGUSON:

24 Q What I really want to focus on, though, is the

25 answers to my question when I'm asking about whether you

Page 43: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 149

1 know that he knew something or was told something. And

2 if you want to layer in there what he should have known,

3 I understand.

4 A I got you. Now I understand

5 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

6 THE WITNESS: Let's just say this, all right.

7 BY MR. FERGUSON:

8 Q Sure.

9 A During the course of this Ponzi scheme over

10 five years and change, I had almost no conversations

11 where I said, Oh, you are now aware of the fraud. I had

12 badges, to use a legal term, badges of fraud. I had

13 people cloaked with the indicia of fraud. It was clear

14 to me that they knew what was going on. That is how I

15 knew that they could be trusted with additional

16 information.

17 That is how I ultimately knew that David and

18 Richard could be trusted to run this, what's now been

19 called a sub-Ponzi.

20 If you match what I did with him to everything

21 I did with every other co-conspirator, you'll see that

22 it matches exactly. If you're going to ask me the

23 question, David, did I tell Richard it was a fraud, the

24 answer is no.

25 MR. FERGUSON: I'd like to mark an e-mail

Page 44: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 150

1 here. What exhibit are we up to, Chuck?

2 MR. LICHTMAN: I think it's 16.

3 THE WITNESS: The last exhibit was 15.

4 MR. LICHTMAN: 16 is next.

5 (Whereupon, Pearson's Exhibit No. 16 was marked

6 for identification.)

7 BY MR. FERGUSON:

8 Q Have you seen this before?

9 A Let me read it. Give me one second.

10 Q Sure.

11 A Okay. I recall this.

12 Q And as is typical with all the e-mails, the top

13 e-mail is the last one.

14 A Sure.

15 Q And that's from you to Richard and cc David

16 Boden; is that right?

17 A The top one?

18 Q Yes, sir.

19 A The top one is from me to Rich in response to

20 his e-mail below.

21 Q October 28th you're in Morocco at this point;

22 is that right?

23 A Correct.

24 Q What day did you leave, the 27th, Tuesday?

25 A I think the 27th, yeah.

Page 45: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 151

1 Q You tell Richard in response to his e-mail

2 below that you've had a major breach in confidentiality

3 and to chill.

4 This e-mail seems a little different than the

5 communication that you had with Boden in which my client

6 wasn't cc'ed where you're communicating with Boden about

7 what it's going to take to pay everybody off.

8 A This is my CYA letter in response to what's

9 below, which is clearly Mr. Pearson's, Uh-oh, what am I

10 going to do. Let me start covering my ass letter. It's

11 the most detailed e-mail he'd ever sent me.

12 Q And you are confident that he didn't mean

13 anything that he wrote in that e-mail to you below?

14 A Say that again.

15 Q You're confident that this is nothing more than

16 a CYA letter and my client didn't legitimately mean

17 everything that he said in that e-mail to you?

18 A The part where he says he's really concerned, I

19 think that that's true.

20 Q Why are you --

21 A He hasn't received payments. That is true.

22 MR. NURIK: Let him finish.

23 BY MR. FERGUSON:

24 Q I'm not asking for you to go through the entire

25 e-mail.

Page 46: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 152

1 A Oh, okay.

2 Q I'm just asking you if you believe it's true

3 or -- if he believed it's true or not.

4 A I believe that parts of it are true, and I

5 believe that at this point in time he knew he was

6 involved in a fraud and that he was freaking out as many

7 people were.

8 Q What is the purpose of your response basically

9 appearing to reply as if this is still a legitimate

10 operation with a breach of confidentiality? Why did you

11 do that?

12 A This is exactly the same way I responded to a

13 lot of people. I provided e-mails to them that I was

14 deeming to be something that they could use in the

15 future or that comported with the story that I was

16 telling other people that I was corresponding with.

17 Q For what purpose? Why didn't you just tell him

18 it's over?

19 A I didn't tell anyone that, I don't think. I

20 don't recall telling anyone it's over until a day or two

21 after this. I would have to look at the all the e-mail

22 traffic, but I was in no shape to make a judgment one

23 way or the other.

24 I mean, if you look, I mean it's clear from the

25 amount of money and everything else that Szafranski was

Page 47: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 153

1 involved in it, that Szafranski was involved. I wrote

2 similar e-mails to Szafranski back and forth. I wrote

3 similar e-mails to Preve.

4 Q Are you doing Richard a favor by responding in

5 this vein as opposed to candidly, in your mind, when you

6 sent this back?

7 A I don't know if I'm doing him a favor or not.

8 Q But, according to you, you were playing along

9 with his CYA communication?

10 A Almost everybody that wrote me at this point in

11 time an e-mail where they were purportedly stating that

12 they were innocent when I knew they weren't, I responded

13 in the same vein. Why I did it? I can't tell you.

14 Q Because, frankly, this wouldn't cover anyone's

15 "A" in light of what you knew about the bottom of the

16 operation. An e-mail like this is going to do no good.

17 A Well, it would actually because it did, to a

18 limited extent, for other people I sent it to. They

19 were utilizing what I was sending to tell the innocent

20 investors the story line as to what was occurring.

21 I mean, I think it was clear to all of the

22 people that were involved that this thing had exploded.

23 You find out that I'm outside the country. There's

24 potentially some problems. And you'll see people all of

25 a sudden writing very, very strict business-like

Page 48: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 154

1 e-mails, people that were never writing me e-mails like

2 this before are all of a sudden writing me these very

3 business-like, very strict, very detailed,

4 detail-oriented e-mails as opposed to Mr. Pearson's

5 other e-mails that were just like, increase this deal by

6 this one much and send the 100 grand or 200 grand to RL

7 Pearson & Company.

8 This draft is different, I think you'd agree,

9 between this e-mail and my normal e-mail traffic with

10 Richard.

11 Q Yes, I'll agree. But, Scott, this is the first

12 time you've hopped a plane to Morocco with a bag of

13 money and you weren't there to answer questions. I

14 mean, candidly at this point in time nothing like this

15 had ever occurred in this investment scheme.

16 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

17 BY MR. FERGUSON:

18 Q Correct, this was markedly different? Wouldn't

19 you expect when you jump on a private plane and leave

20 the country that you're now going to get e-mails from

21 people that are markedly different than when the deals

22 were flowing?

23 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form, compound.

24 It's like four questions.

25 BY MR. FERGUSON:

Page 49: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 155

1 Q Go ahead and answer.

2 A I would suspect that with someone like Pearson

3 who probably was having somewhere close to a heart

4 attack when he realized I had left the country, that he

5 was going to do everything humanly possible to avoid

6 going to jail.

7 The way I view these e-mails, having had a lot

8 of time to read them and reflect on them, is that these

9 e-mails by my co-conspirators were nothing more than

10 their equivalent of my getting on a jet and going to

11 Morocco. It was their method of fleeing.

12 Q At this time, the day after you left, it seems

13 from some of the e-mail traffic, even the e-mail to

14 Boden, that you were still hopeful that you could

15 salvage this, correct? The first day after you left you

16 hadn't thrown in the towel yet for sure.

17 A Oh, no. I had actually thrown in the towel. I

18 was scrambling to try to figure out what the heck to

19 do. The only way I really, and it was kind of crazy,

20 the only way I really thought I could be rescued was if

21 George Levin somehow was convinced to do a raise that

22 would have returned the principles at least to these

23 people.

24 But I knew no matter what that if I returned to

25 the United States I was going to prison.

Page 50: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 156

1 Q But, you still, particularly early after your

2 departure, had the hope that some money could be plugged

3 in and somehow right the ship. And George was one of

4 your potential sources for that; is that correct?

5 A I don't think you can use the word hope with

6 anything related to me from the moment I stepped on that

7 plane and left the country. I was beyond despondent,

8 so...

9 Q You're telling Richard to hang in there, be

10 quiet, chill out. And clearly if he did, then your

11 hopes were that you could get more money from his

12 investors in addition to whatever you could marshal from

13 Levin or anyone else?

14 A No, no. I wasn't expecting to get anymore

15 money from any investors. The only person I would have

16 taken any money from at that point in time was someone I

17 perceived to be in the know, at least to some extent,

18 who was trying to bail out the innocent investors.

19 Q And George isn't in that basket in your mind?

20 A Preve is in that basket.

21 Q But that's a no for George?

22 A I still never made my mind up as to George.

23 Q Fair enough. So in your mind, though, Richard

24 Pearson was a co-conspirator?

25 A In my mind?

Page 51: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 157

1 Q Yes.

2 A Yes.

3 Q List all the reasons why in your mind he was a

4 co-conspirator.

5 A You have to give me all the e-mail traffic

6 between me and him. I mean, I could take a stab at it.

7 Q Take a stab at what you know without looking at

8 external documents or e-mail traffic.

9 A To the best of my recollection?

10 Q Yes, sir.

11 A He lied to his investors to lure them in. He

12 changed deal amounts to my knowledge without any

13 indication that there really needed to be any approval,

14 conversation with, discussion, consent from a plaintiff

15 that did not exist.

16 He created fake CYA finder fees letters along

17 with David Boden to allow him to steal money from his

18 own investors.

19 He lied to his investors about due diligence

20 that he did. If this was a real investment he would

21 have done real due diligence, would have created an

22 investment packet or an addendum to his PPM using that

23 due diligence and given it to them. That in and of

24 itself was a crime.

25 He lied to his investors about his access to

Page 52: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 158

1 view account balances.

2 He was in my office often enough when deal

3 documents were being completed that he should have seen

4 that there was nobody doing anything.

5 Moreover, on that same point, he had early on

6 asked to see plaintiffs, and I had told him

7 specifically, "Talk to Dave Boden."

8 If he didn't know that this was a fraud, on the

9 days when he was in David Boden's office and documents

10 were on their way back to him, all he had to do was make

11 some attempt, even sit in the waiting room, to see if

12 anyone ever showed up to do anything, to sign anything.

13 Q You had back doors to your office, though.

14 There were multiple entrances to your office. I've been

15 there before. Could you say that someone could sit with

16 confidence in your lobby and know that they witnessed

17 everyone that came in and out of your three floors,

18 including your own private chamber in the back?

19 A Sure, because clients and defendants only came

20 in through the front door. They couldn't get in any

21 other doors.

22 Q I don't --

23 MR. LICHTMAN: I don't think he finished his

24 answer.

25 MR. FERGUSON: He might not have. But I'm

Page 53: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 159

1 sorry, Chuck. I've got two hours, and I'm going to

2 have to jump in on a narrative.

3 If he needs to stop me from doing so, I will

4 work with you, Scott. But I normally would never

5 do that.

6 THE WITNESS: Let me --

7 BY MR. FERGUSON:

8 Q Go ahead.

9 A Do you have another question before I

10 continue?

11 Q My question is, if someone legitimately

12 believes that these were sensitive plaintiff

13 confidentiality plaintiff issues, how do you know they

14 wouldn't assume that the plaintiff would come in through

15 the back door that led to your office through the

16 private elevator that no one could see?

17 If he was aware that the office was set up that

18 way, isn't it possible that he reasonably believed they

19 were just being brought in and out through one of the

20 "bat cave" exit or whatever way to get into your office?

21 A Richard spent plenty of time in our office. He

22 knew how the building was set up with the private

23 entrances and the like. There's no way for anyone to

24 get in that office unless he believed that someone came

25 up and did like a secret knock, and then I miraculously

Page 54: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 160

1 or someone else miraculously heard the secret knock,

2 because that door was kind of far away from everything,

3 came up and then went to that door.

4 So if you want to take it to its most

5 illogical, he could believe anything. He could have

6 believed that there was some kind of transporter beam

7 that I transported all these people into my office. I

8 don't know what he believed.

9 I can tell you what he could have tried to do.

10 Very frequently in this particular fraud you can tell

11 what people know, not only by what they did and didn't

12 do, but what - excuse me - not by what they did do, but

13 by what they didn't do.

14 Q Due diligence?

15 A Not just due diligence. It's just there was a

16 point in time --

17 Q I haven't asked -- you're now responding to a

18 question I didn't ask.

19 A No, no, no. I'm still going through the list

20 of things.

21 Q Let's go through the list.

22 A He asked David Boden at one point in time

23 something that I actually hadn't even thought of

24 covering the bases on. It became a concern to me later,

25 was that he asked David Boden to get copies of either

Page 55: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 161

1 the driver's license or the Passport of the plaintiff.

2 This was early on.

3 And I actually thought that was a great due

4 diligence question. We couldn't provide it to him

5 obviously because we didn't have it. We never attempted

6 to provide it to him and he never sought to see it

7 again.

8 Q Who did he ask, David Boden?

9 A David Boden and me.

10 Q Do you know if he ever followed up to David

11 about that?

12 A To my knowledge, no. David would have come

13 running to me if he had asked him for something like

14 that. He didn't need to ask. He knew it was all a

15 fraud.

16 Q How do you know David would have come running

17 to you as opposed to just saying, No, we just can't do

18 that because of confidentiality and it's not going to

19 happen?

20 A Think about this. When he said it to me, he

21 said, Just cross out -- he said, cross out the name,

22 cross out the address. Block out -- he even said at one

23 point in time when we were joking around, he said, block

24 out the eyes, you know, like they do on those websites.

25 He said, Block out the eyes. I just want to see that a

Page 56: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 162

1 real person exists.

2 Q But if he knew that this was false, then why

3 wouldn't he say, Go ahead and make those up just like

4 the, according to you, that he knew the plaintiffs'

5 authorizations and the fees were just a CYA document?

6 If he was aware that this was a scam, why was he asking

7 for those documents? Let me finish.

8 A Go ahead.

9 Q Why was he asking for those documents and why

10 wouldn't he just ask you if he thought he needed them to

11 just cook them up like everything else you did?

12 A You just made my point. He did ask me for

13 those documents early on. That's how the conversation

14 came up.

15 Q But he never got them?

16 A That's right. And then as time went on he

17 stopped. That's normally what people did. Szafranski

18 started doing semi real due diligence in the beginning.

19 Preve and Levin did semi real due diligence in the

20 beginning. And then as they knew it was a fraud -- He's

21 got all the indicators of someone that's cloaked with

22 these badges of fraud, that he knew what was going on,

23 because he goes from doing -- and his due diligence was

24 always weak except that one good question that he

25 asked.

Page 57: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 163

1 But he went from asking to all of a sudden

2 funding more and more and more, bigger and more frequent

3 deals, and his due diligence is going the other way.

4 Whereas, the Von Allmens, the Coquinas --

5 Q But I --

6 A Let me finish.

7 Q Finish, but I need for get my questions asked.

8 A The Von Allmens, and Coquinas, the more money -

9 the AJ Clockwork people - the more deals, the bigger

10 deals they funded, the more due diligence they did, not

11 the less.

12 Q I want to address this point of due diligence.

13 Are you aware that Richard Pearson was not expected by

14 any of his investors to do due diligence for them, and,

15 in fact, they hired companies to do due diligence, the

16 investors that he brought in, Merrill Lynch?

17 A I don't know if I knew that one way or the

18 other.

19 Q Are you aware of a single investor that came in

20 through what you are referring to as the Boden/Pearson

21 sub-Ponzi that relied upon or expected Richard Pearson

22 to do any due diligence for them as you sit here today?

23 A I don't know one way the other.

24 Q Same question, same investors, are you aware of

25 any not having their own professional lawyers and

Page 58: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 164

1 accountants to do the due diligence?

2 A I'm not aware of it. And here's the problem

3 with that. All these people you're saying were supposed

4 to do the due diligence, no one did anything.

5 Q Again, that may be the case.

6 A Well, if Pearson --

7 Q I want an answer.

8 A Isn't he going to ask these people, okay, I

9 hired you -- you're saying they hired Merrill Lynch to

10 do due diligence. Okay, Merrill Lynch, what did you

11 find? Nothing, we didn't do anything.

12 Q Scott, in fairness, I'm asking you, Did you

13 understand that the investors that came in through

14 Pearson weren't looking to him to do due diligence?

15 And now you're asking me a question back as to

16 whether he rode over and oversaw the due diligence

17 team.

18 Can you identify a single investor that relied

19 upon Richard Pearson to do due diligence?

20 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

21 THE WITNESS: I don't know one way or the

22 other.

23 BY MR. FERGUSON:

24 Q Do you know of a single investor that was not

25 told by Pearson and/or Boden that they would be getting

Page 59: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 165

1 fees out of this deal?

2 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection, foundation.

3 THE WITNESS: I have to look at the e-mail

4 traffic. I don't recall one way or the other.

5 But, you know what, you can't really make the

6 argument you're making because --

7 BY MR. FERGUSON:

8 Q Well, Scott, I'm not --

9 A Richard --

10 Q No, no. Scott --

11 A Hold on a minute. I want to answer the due

12 diligence question.

13 Richard did do - attempt to do, through David

14 early on, partial due diligence because he was

15 forwarding these questions to David.

16 Q Before he brought investors?

17 A Before, during, after, I don't know.

18 Q But, before he brought investors you were lying

19 to him. You already said in the beginning you lied to

20 him?

21 A Absolutely.

22 Q And David lied to him?

23 A I assume he did, yes.

24 Q So he's asking questions before he brings

25 investors in, and he's being lied to. So at least at

Page 60: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 166

1 that point in time he's certainly not a co-conspirator.

2 He might be doing an inadequate job of asking questions,

3 but he's not a co-conspirator?

4 A At that point in time, no.

5 Q When did he cross the line?

6 A I don't remember the exact time. It was around

7 the time that David started doing all the deals himself

8 with Deb without my involvement.

9 Q A month or two months into it?

10 A I don't recall. We have to sit and look at all

11 this paperwork to determine exactly.

12 Q And David made a substantial amount of money

13 off the investors that came in through what you're

14 calling the Boden/Pearson sub-Ponzi, correct?

15 A Yes. But not as much as Mr. Pearson.

16 Q But he had a strong financial incentive to make

17 sure that the Pearson deal flow continued?

18 A Yes, but not as much as Mr. Pearson did.

19 Q And you testified that that wing of the Ponzi

20 was sort of up and running without much of your

21 oversight; is that correct?

22 A That is correct.

23 Q In fairness, though, isn't that just a

24 circumstance because you're now focused on the big funds

25 due to the April '09 almost catastrophic implosion and

Page 61: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 167

1 your attention is diverted elsewhere?

2 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

3 THE WITNESS: It was a function of that

4 combined with the fact that they were totally

5 capable of running their portion of the scheme by

6 themselves. It was the first time that it ever

7 happened. They were actually doing the entire

8 thing all by themselves with very little input from

9 me.

10 BY MR. FERGUSON:

11 Q But that has nothing to do with Richard

12 Pearson. It's not like Richard Pearson told you, Go

13 focus on these large hedge finds and David and I are

14 going to run our own operation. You never had that

15 discussion.

16 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

17 THE WITNESS: No, I did not.

18 BY MR. FERGUSON:

19 Q In fact, when you first met with Pearson you

20 told him part of the lie. You told him that you were

21 dissatisfied with Banyon and that you were looking for a

22 new reliable funding source and hoped he could fill

23 those shoes?

24 A I think I said I was dissatisfied with the New

25 York hedge funds.

Page 62: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 168

1 Q Okay. Sorry.

2 A That's okay.

3 Q I did see an e-mail, and you're right, that's

4 what it said. You were welcoming him as your hopeful

5 new reliable source of funds.

6 A Yes.

7 Q The PPM that you showed him from Banyon, that

8 was version 3 with edits from Preve, you testified that

9 they were going to do their own PPM, Pearson and Boden.

10 Did they?

11 A Ultimately I don't recall seeing a final

12 product, so I don't know whether they did or not. They

13 did do some kind of confidential settlement funding

14 packet that I saw.

15 Q When you say "they," you can't testify with any

16 accuracy what percentage of effort between Boden and

17 Pearson was dedicated to that packet, could you?

18 A No. But I did see it for the first time in

19 Mr. Pearson's office.

20 Q But for all you know it was completely

21 generated by Boden?

22 A Could have been completely generated by

23 anybody.

24 Q But most likely Boden at least had a hand in

25 it; is that correct?

Page 63: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 169

1 A That's my best guess.

2 (Whereupon, Pearson's Exhibit No. 17 was marked

3 for identification.)

4 BY MR. FERGUSON:

5 Q I'm going to ask you to take a look at one more

6 e-mail. This will be 17. I apologize. It's been

7 highlighted by someone long before I got hold of it.

8 And it's a little difficult to read, but I think if

9 you'll bear with me we can get what I need out of the

10 document.

11 A Okay.

12 Q Whenever you're ready, Scott.

13 A I'm ready.

14 Q This is a pretty short one page e-mail chain.

15 Have you seen this chain before?

16 A I have.

17 Q At the bottom of the document there's an e-mail

18 from you. And, again, I know it's hard to read, but

19 I'll try to drawn your attention to what I'm talking

20 about. It's an e-mail from you to Richard on August 1,

21 2009.

22 So he's been involved -- April he starts to

23 negotiate with you about being a new reliable funding

24 source, correct? By May there's deal flow from him,

25 correct?

Page 64: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 170

1 A Yes.

2 Q So April, May, June, July, August. He's five

3 months in and we're getting towards the end of the

4 operation; is that fair to say?

5 A Yes.

6 Q And that bottom e-mail says, We need to try to

7 fund 10 million deals this coming week to avoid losing

8 plaintiffs.

9 A Yes.

10 Q If Richard Pearson is your co-conspirator and

11 he knows there's no plaintiffs, why bother to say that?

12 A Okay. Maybe you missed it when you were

13 reading all those transcripts. But that is exactly the

14 Ponzi-speak that once someone was involved that I used

15 with everybody. People who, you sitting here today,

16 clearly know were involved like a Mike Szafranski, a

17 Frank Preve, a David Boden who you're clearly saying was

18 involved and snowed your client, they all got similar

19 e-mails.

20 Q Let me just interrupt to be clear.

21 A They all got similar e-mails.

22 Q Scott, I'm not saying that David Boden knew. I

23 don't know if he knew. I'm just here to find out what

24 you know. That may be the case. It may not be the

25 case. I want it clear I'm not testifying. And I really

Page 65: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 171

1 am not the one to ask. I've got my own views of

2 everything. But I'm an advocate here. So I just want

3 the record clear that I'm not saying that.

4 A Okay. Regardless, this is nothing more than

5 Ponzi speak. The record is full of e-mails to people

6 who are clearly part of the fraud, clearly

7 co-conspirators, where I used very similar language.

8 This is not exculpatory in any fashion.

9 Q Let's go back up to the middle. There's a

10 highlight section here. And it's from Richard to you.

11 I'm sorry. Again, from you to Richard, same day about

12 40 minutes later. "Just spoke Debra. She will have

13 most of the clients signed up over the weekend."

14 A Yes.

15 Q Why waste precious time this late in the game

16 telling him anything of that nature other than to

17 comfort him and make him believe, because you were lying

18 to him; isn't this still you lying to him?

19 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

20 THE WITNESS: No, not at this point in time.

21 This is just more of the same nonsense that we were

22 doing back and forth with all the people that were

23 involved. It never changed.

24 Just because Preve liked to send me e-mails

25 that were inculpatory for him, didn't mean that I

Page 66: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 172

1 was going to join in the fun with anybody.

2 I tried very hard. And the e-mails will bear

3 me out, to keep the same methodology, the same

4 language, the same Ponzi-speak over and over and

5 over again.

6 I don't think I ever wrote an e-mail to anyone

7 where I said, Hey, I need money for my fraud. It's

8 just not the way I would write.

9 BY MR. FERGUSON:

10 Q Well, you're speculating that Pearson knew

11 there were no clients because of what he should have

12 known, fair enough?

13 A I am making an informed decision based upon

14 every single thing that I know about what was going on.

15 Q And I accept that as opposed to that you've got

16 some document or evidence or a conversation where he

17 looked at you and said, Scott, I am aware there's no

18 plaintiffs. I don't care.

19 A I told you he and I never had a discussion

20 where we said, Hey, how's the fraud going? Or he never

21 said to me, Scott, I know this is a fraud.

22 Q But, if you're wrong about what he knew and

23 maybe he should have sat in your lobby and seen the

24 plaintiffs coming or not coming and going, but if you're

25 wrong about that, then as of August 14th he could

Page 67: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 173

1 reasonably believe that you have clients that are coming

2 in over the weekend to sign based on this e-mail?

3 A And based upon my knowledge of everything that

4 I knew about Pearson at that point in time, as we've

5 already gone over and over, he knew what was going on.

6 I mean, by August of '09 I had a pretty good feel for

7 who knew and who didn't know.

8 Q Let's talk about your mental state in August

9 of '09. I mean, for the life of me, I can't imagine

10 what you were going through. How are you sure your

11 assessments of everyone around you and who was tainted

12 and who wasn't is accurate based upon your predicament?

13 MR. LICHTMAN: Object to form.

14 THE WITNESS: Unfortunately for me because of

15 the way I was functioning at that point in time, if

16 anything, David, my awareness was heightened. I

17 was on a full alert. Okay?

18 Remember, I was trying to pull literally over

19 $100 million out of Mr. Scherer's clients. I was

20 in full on. Don't do business with anyone who's

21 going to detect. Do business with the people that

22 you can fool in

23 pull-as-much-money-out-as-fast-as-you-can mode. I

24 didn't have time to screw around with someone who

25 may or may not have known.

Page 68: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 174

1 BY MR. FERGUSON:

2 Q You're still screwing around with people who

3 didn't know and people who may or may not have known and

4 people who did know, according to your testimony.

5 A You have to understand this. When I say "screw

6 around," I mean, I couldn't be bothered with the in

7 betweens. There were the people who knew, the people

8 who didn't know.

9 If Pearson was giving me a hard time, if

10 Pearson gave me any indication that he was going to blow

11 this thing up, I would have bailed on the relationship

12 with him.

13 But he was in the know. He was in David's

14 pocket. They were working together. They were lying to

15 investors. They had every indication of carrying on a

16 major fraud on investors.

17 Q How did they lie to investors exactly?

18 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

19 THE WITNESS: Understanding that they knew what

20 was going on and they lied about the existence of

21 plaintiffs. They lied about the existence of

22 defendants. They lied about access to bank

23 accounts. They lied about the amounts of the

24 deals. They changed amounts of the deals without

25 contacting any plaintiffs, without even asking for

Page 69: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 175

1 plaintiffs to be contacted to agree to these

2 things. They lied about money being in the bank

3 that wasn't there.

4 Richard lied about investing money in deals

5 when he didn't really invest money in any deals.

6 BY MR. FERGUSON:

7 Q How would Richard know if money is in the bank

8 or not? Wasn't it Boden that had access to that

9 information?

10 A You're asking me to use my total field of

11 knowledge. Again, I wasn't in there with David. I can

12 only tell you what I know from what I observed. Those

13 are my observations.

14 Q Did Richard have access to the phony TD Bank

15 website that you could pull up from your office on your

16 computer?

17 A Only if David took him into my office or I took

18 him in.

19 Q Could he get in there himself?

20 A No, sir.

21 Q Do you know if he ever did get in there

22 himself?

23 A No, he didn't. I have no knowledge one way or

24 the other, but I can't imagine he would break into my

25 office.

Page 70: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 176

1 Q Do you have any knowledge that he knew that

2 that was a bogus website with phony balances?

3 A I don't know for certain. No, sir.

4 Q The Spinosa cover letter, Caretsky cover

5 letter, fake bank statement shows that were put on at

6 branches, according to you, do you know if my client

7 knew that was occurring and that they were false?

8 MR. SCHLESINGER: Objection to form.

9 THE WITNESS: I don't know one way or the

10 other.

11 BY MR. FERGUSON:

12 Q You've alleged that Spinosa was an assistant or

13 assisted you knowingly in this; is that correct?

14 A I have.

15 MR. SCHLESINGER: Objection to the form.

16 BY MR. FERGUSON:

17 Q You testified -- sorry.

18 A I have testified that Spinosa was involved in a

19 very specific portion of it to a very specific extent,

20 not that he knew that it was a Ponzi scheme or anything

21 like that. I did not get into that with Mr. Spinosa

22 ever.

23 Q Understood. Just so we're clear, Richard

24 Pearson didn't know anything about what Spinosa was

25 helping you do; he didn't know that that was happening

Page 71: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 177

1 or that Spinosa was on board?

2 A I never had that conversation with him, no.

3 Q Okay.

4 A What he knew, you're going to have to talk to

5 him and David Boden.

6 MR. FERGUSON: We're going to need to take a

7 two minute break.

8 (Thereupon, a short break was taken.)

9 BY MR. FERGUSON:

10 Q Scott, we saw some e-mails where it looked like

11 a deal that had been touted months prior gets sold a

12 couple months later, two and-a-half months later?

13 A Yes.

14 Q Do you know whether my client noticed that,

15 whether he was aware of that?

16 A I have no way of knowing that one way or the

17 other except to look at e-mail traffic.

18 Q Fair enough. And to be clear, my client wasn't

19 a lawyer, correct, he was a businessman?

20 A He was not a lawyer. No, sir.

21 Q Is it possible that if he did key in on the

22 fact that there's a deal that was touted two and-a-half

23 months ago that's now being sold, that he just thought

24 it hadn't been picked up?

25 A I don't want to guess as to what he may or may

Page 72: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 178

1 not be have been thinking.

2 Q I'm going to say you probably think it's

3 unlikely. I'm just asking you, is it possible?

4 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

5 THE WITNESS: I would be guessing, but it is

6 certainly possible that he didn't look. It doesn't

7 make any sense to me, but it's possible.

8 BY MR. FERGUSON:

9 Q My question is, is it possible that he did

10 notice that that was a deal that had been touted as

11 available two and-a-half months ago, but that it hadn't

12 been picked up, and it's just now being sold for the

13 first time?

14 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

15 THE WITNESS: I'd be guessing. My best guess

16 is I suspect it's possible. He was a bright guy.

17 I don't know how he would have missed that, but

18 anything is possible, I suppose.

19 Q You understand that bright guy argument sort of

20 collides with itself when you're dealing with someone

21 involved in this thing, and according to you knowingly

22 involved in it, how bright could someone really be if

23 that's the case?

24 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

25 A It does collide with itself.

Page 73: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 179

1 Q Are you aware of any illegal activity that my

2 client engaged in other than bringing investors to your

3 Ponzi scheme?

4 A Only what he told me.

5 Q What did he tell you?

6 A He told me that he had hidden a substantial

7 amount of money in a UBS account to avoid paying taxes

8 in the United States.

9 Q Did he tell you how much money?

10 A No.

11 Q Take me back to that conversation to the best

12 you can, where did it occur?

13 A The first time it occurred we were in his

14 office.

15 Q Who was there?

16 A Me and David Boden.

17 Q And just an approximate time frame if you can

18 backdating it from October at the end.

19 A I can't. You would have to look at -- there

20 were letters that he had received or something, some

21 indication or messages he had gotten from the lawyer

22 that he had handling the UBS problem with the IRS or the

23 government.

24 Q Do you know who that lawyer was?

25 A I don't recall.

Page 74: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 180

1 Q What did he tell you about this situation?

2 A What did Pearson tell me?

3 Q Yes, sir.

4 A He wanted to know if there was anything I could

5 do to help him.

6 Q Did he tell you how much money?

7 A I don't recall.

8 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

9 Q Did he tell you --

10 A It was in the millions of dollars.

11 Q Did he tell you over what period of time this

12 occurred?

13 A No, he just told me his name popped up on some

14 disclosures that UBS had made to the United States

15 government and that he needed to settle it or risk going

16 to jail.

17 Q What was your response?

18 A I told him to talk to David about it.

19 Q Did he do so?

20 A I don't know one way or the other. David was

21 there during this conversation the first time we talked

22 about it.

23 Q Did the conversation proceed any further at

24 that juncture or did you move onto other topics?

25 A I don't recall one way or the other.

Page 75: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 181

1 Q You said that from your testimony it appeared

2 that there was more than one time this was brought up.

3 Was there another time?

4 A There was because there were a few times when

5 Richard, to me, when we were having business

6 conversations not regarding this, not regarding the

7 Ponzi scheme, he was trying to get me involved in some

8 other business deals he wanted me to fund, some deal

9 with the Florida Panthers, that he seemed extremely

10 distracted.

11 And I asked him in a concerned way if he was

12 all right. And he kept telling me, no, he was under

13 tremendous pressure on this UBS thing, he was very

14 concerned about it, and that's the extent of the

15 conversations we had.

16 Q Where was that, that conversation?

17 A One of the conversations occurred in Bova. One

18 of the conversations occurred in my car, we were driving

19 out to the Bank Atlantic Center to go meet with, I

20 forget the guy's name, he was one of the major players

21 in the Florida Panthers.

22 Q Now, this is a time when you need millions of

23 dollars and you have a money source client telling you

24 that he has millions of dollars offshore in a UBS

25 account, did you make a play for that money?

Page 76: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 182

1 A I had been trying to get him -- not that

2 specific money, no. I had been trying to get Richard to

3 invest from the very beginning.

4 Q But you didn't seize upon this conversation

5 where he revealed multimillions of dollars offshore as

6 an opportunity to try to convince him to maybe move it

7 to you?

8 A No.

9 Q Why not?

10 A That time he and I had this conversation it was

11 clear to me he was only going to use other people's

12 money.

13 Q Other than the conversation with you and Boden

14 present, was there any other time that it was discussed

15 in the presence of others, others being in addition to

16 you or Boden?

17 A I don't recall who else we spoke about it in

18 front of, we may have spoke to Carl Linder, Denis

19 Kleinfeld about it because they were familiar with

20 offshore issues.

21 Q Do you know if you did speak to either one of

22 them about this offshore issue?

23 A I recall speaking to one or both of them. I

24 don't remember whether Pearson was there during the

25 conversation or not.

Page 77: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 183

1 Q What was discussed with them if you recall?

2 A I wanted to know if they had any familiarity

3 with the UBS issue. That I had a client friend who had

4 an issue with money in one of the offshore accounts that

5 the government was saying that he needed to pay taxes

6 on.

7 Q What was their response?

8 A I don't recall one way or the other.

9 Q Did anyone from your firm endeavor to help him

10 with this problem that he reported to you?

11 A You have to check, the best thing to do would

12 be to check the e-mail traffic of Carl Linder and Denis

13 Kleinfeld, because that's who I would have referred him

14 to. I seem to have a recollection of him meeting with

15 them to discuss the issue.

16 Q Was that after you directed them to -- you

17 directed him to them and you believe they might have

18 met, did you have any other conversations with Pearson

19 about it?

20 A Just give me one second.

21 Q Of course.

22 A Not that I recall.

23 Q Any other illegal activity that my client

24 engaged in that you're aware of, putting aside the Ponzi

25 scheme, putting aside the purported UBS problem that he

Page 78: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 184

1 related to you, anything else?

2 A Well, this is additional illegal activity but

3 it's kind of tied to the Ponzi scheme, do you want it?

4 Q Yes, sir.

5 A At one point in time there was actually an

6 additional time that I had to, for lack of a better

7 term, yell at him about what he was telling people. He

8 had told one of the investors who then sought to confirm

9 through Mr. Boden and I that he had $11 million invested

10 with us. I can't remember who the hell he told it to

11 but I went through the roof because they wanted me to

12 confirm it. I was like, What are you doing, why are you

13 telling people these things when you don't need to go

14 that far to sell the product?

15 Okay. He just said, It came out when I was

16 talking to them, you know, I told them I had money in,

17 they wanted to make sure I had skin in the game.

18 I told him, You should really knock it off

19 because this thing is going to explode if he keeps

20 making promises and telling people things that are

21 impossible for us to establish. We have to start

22 creating more fake documents, it's not a smart idea when

23 we were in the middle of a fraud to keep adding to the

24 fraud. I was creating enough problems for all of us.

25 Q Do you have any idea which investor that was

Page 79: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 185

1 that he would have made that representation to?

2 A You can figure it out, yeah, there's e-mail

3 traffic detailing him telling them.

4 Q Your recollection is it was one investor, not

5 more?

6 A Could have been more. Let me tell you there

7 are clear e-mails between Pearson, Boden, investors and

8 from investor to investor, clearly establishing that

9 Pearson told an investor he had 11 million invested in

10 these deals. There are e-mails establishing also both

11 of the other things. There are e-mails between

12 investors where they're talking about the fact that

13 Pearson had said this entire thing has been fully

14 audited, and there are audited financials, it's been

15 audited by a Big Four. That's clearly back and forth

16 between investors about what Pearson told them and also

17 that he had access to the banking.

18 So, there are e-mails clearly establishing all

19 of those what I'll call badges of fraud.

20 Q The access to the banking though, as far as he

21 knew, Boden did have access to the banking through your

22 office?

23 A To the best of my knowledge, that's what he

24 knew, I'm just telling you what he told investors.

25 Q Fair enough. At the time that he made the

Page 80: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 186

1 statement that he had 11 million in the deal, do you

2 know how much money, investors he had brought to the

3 deal, had put in to the Ponzi scheme?

4 A I have no idea but the e-mail made clear he

5 wasn't talking about other investors' money. He said he

6 had 11 million in the game.

7 Q Do you know if Mr. Pearson had to personally

8 guarantee one of these deals, perhaps the first one?

9 A I don't recall.

10 Q Are you the infamous Goodfella poster from Bob

11 Norman's blog? Did you ever make a post under that name

12 after you returned from Morocco?

13 Let me back up. I think I need to rephrase the

14 question based upon the face you just made at me. You

15 are aware of Bob Norman, correct?

16 A Yes.

17 Q I won't go into the history and all of that, I

18 don't have time.

19 A I don't mind.

20 Q I know you don't, I just can't use my time that

21 way.

22 Did you ever post in there under a pseudonym in

23 the form topics comments section to any of his pieces?

24 MR. LaVECCHIO: One moment.

25 MR. FERGUSON: Certainly.

Page 81: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 187

1 MR. LaVECCHIO: I'm interposing an objection.

2 Privilege.

3 Q Fair enough.

4 Did you ever make any posts in Bob Norman's

5 blog about Richard Pearson and David Boden? I don't

6 want to know about anybody else in the context of any

7 posts you made after coming back from Morocco.

8 A I don't have a recollection one way or the

9 other.

10 Q Were you angry at David Boden when you left for

11 Morocco?

12 A No, sir.

13 Q Were you angry at Richard Pearson?

14 A I'm still not angry with him today.

15 Q Did Richard Pearson ever cross you or scam you

16 in any way?

17 A To my knowledge?

18 Q Yes, sir.

19 A No.

20 Q I know you were asked before about an

21 encounter, you were having lunch with Pearson, I believe

22 it was Tuesday, I'm sorry, with Spinosa at Bova, that

23 would have been the day you left, did you in fact have

24 lunch with Spinosa at Bova the day you left for

25 Morocco?

Page 82: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 188

1 A I believe I did, yes.

2 Q When you were having lunch with him had you

3 already planned to leave the country?

4 A Yes.

5 Q What was the purpose of your lunch with Spinosa

6 that day if you recall?

7 A I don't recall.

8 Q Could you describe your condition during that

9 lunch?

10 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

11 Q Your mental condition?

12 A Frazzled probably.

13 Q Do you remember what you talked about with

14 Spinosa?

15 A Not a clue.

16 Q Did you in any way let him know that directly

17 or indirectly that you were leaving the country?

18 A I may have told him I was traveling but I

19 certainly didn't him I was fleeing the country.

20 Q Do you recall Richard Pearson walking up to you

21 during that lunch?

22 A I have a vague recollection of it.

23 Q Did he confront you about anything to your

24 recollection?

25 A You know, there are stories saying that he did,

Page 83: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 189

1 I just don't have a recollection of him confronting me.

2 It wasn't Pearson's way especially in front of someone

3 else for him to do that. And there's e-mail traffic in

4 an e-mail, actually the e-mail you showed me that's

5 actually referring to him meeting him.

6 And it just says, You introduced me to Frank

7 yesterday. That's the October - that's Exhibit 16,

8 October 28th, Wednesday. It says: Also you introduced

9 me to Frank yesterday and I'd like the opportunity once

10 we've set up the locked accounts to visit a branch with

11 him and confirm balances.

12 It certainly doesn't sound like a follow-up

13 e-mail after having confronted me because I have to tell

14 you, I don't have a recollection one way or the other.

15 Q But when you walked away from that lunch where

16 he references that he was introduced to Spinosa, Spinosa

17 didn't know you were fleeing the country, he just

18 thought you were traveling?

19 A I don't even know if he knew I was traveling.

20 Q And there's no way Richard would have known

21 that you had left the country when he sent that e-mail?

22 A I don't know what he knew when he sent the

23 e-mail.

24 Q Do you have any knowledge that my client was

25 aware that you were out of the country in Morocco when

Page 84: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 190

1 he sent that e-mail to you?

2 A I do not know one way or the other. Best thing

3 to do is to check the e-mail traffic between Boden and

4 him.

5 Q When was the last time you saw Richard

6 Pearson?

7 A It would have had to have been that day in Bova

8 when I was eating lunch with Mr. Spinosa.

9 Q You have mentioned that Boden and Pearson

10 changed deal documents. I know we've talked about the

11 client fee letter. Other than that, what other

12 documents were changed? And you talked about some

13 terms, but I'm talking now about the specific documents,

14 what other documents were changed or different for

15 Pearson and Boden as opposed to the others?

16 A It was just terms in the documents.

17 Q Give me a second.

18 Do you have an understanding of the total

19 amount of money that Pearson's investors, I'll say

20 Pearson and Boden, that the investors that you put under

21 that umbrella, what the total number was?

22 A I don't have a recollection.

23 Q Give me one second.

24 A Sure.

25 Q What's the first date in your mind that you

Page 85: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 191

1 crossed over into criminality? And if it's not the

2 Ponzi scheme - I remember reading your testimony about

3 you went to law school, never had trouble with law

4 enforcement before this?

5 A That's correct.

6 Q And I've read your testimony about how it

7 began. Is this the first time you were engaged in

8 criminal conduct or was there any criminal conduct as a

9 lawyer prior to the Ponzi scheme starting?

10 A I think that if you go back and examine all my

11 relationships that there were various things at law

12 firms that I worked for, Philips, Eisinger firm is a

13 great example, where there were elements of criminality

14 exhibited by myself and by my partners. Because you

15 have to include in that any lawyer who takes cash from a

16 client and doesn't declare it, it's a criminal act. We

17 know it goes on but it's a criminal act.

18 Even adjusting a bill to include 10 minutes of

19 time that you didn't really spend, that's a crime.

20 Q And putting it in the mail would be mail fraud;

21 is that right?

22 A From the firm, right.

23 Q Sorry, I had to.

24 A I mean seriously, when you examine your life in

25 a manner, you know I've had a tremendous amount of

Page 86: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 192

1 introspection over the last two years. And when you

2 examine - to me - the legal profession as a whole, and

3 that's not to cast an aspersion on the legal profession

4 as a whole, it's to cast an aspersion on the fact that

5 there are, unfortunately, in what otherwise really I

6 truly believe is a noble profession, there's just so

7 much room for bad.

8 And so many people, unfortunately, for no

9 reason at all than a little bit of greed do some really

10 bad things.

11 When you look back on the scope of my crime and

12 see how many lawyers and ultimately law enforcement,

13 politicians and members of the judiciary were involved

14 with things, it's mind numbing.

15 So, to the extent did I take cash from a client

16 way back when with other partners and lawyers and not

17 declare it, sure.

18 Q How about anything where you took cash from

19 clients or anything like that? Did that start at RRA

20 with the Ponzi scheme getting underway?

21 A I'd have to sit and go back through other

22 firms, like the Philips Eisinger firm, and see what was

23 going on back then.

24 Q Understood.

25 A I mean you just -- there are so many different

Page 87: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 193

1 levels of potential fraud that, looking back and

2 introspection, lawyers who are otherwise very, very good

3 and decent people did very stupid things.

4 Q I have to, as an advocate for my client, pry

5 into another area.

6 A Pry anywhere you want. I'm an open book in

7 case you couldn't tell.

8 MR. NURIK: I might have some issues with that

9 but....

10 Q Particularly the last six months, which is most

11 important from my perspective for my job here, you had

12 to have been under an extreme amount of pressure. How

13 were you able to keep all of the balls in the air? I

14 mean you individually, I know you've got people helping

15 you, but how were you able to keep track of all of these

16 threads and these stories? How? Were you overwhelmed?

17 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

18 A Of course I was overwhelmed.

19 Q Stressed?

20 A Very.

21 Q Were you sleeping well?

22 A Sometimes, sometimes not. I don't think you

23 ever sleep well when you're engaged in anything of this

24 magnitude.

25 Q Did you have to take drugs during that period

Page 88: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 194

1 of time?

2 A I drank, I ate Xanax.

3 Q You know where I'm going with this, this is no

4 secret, I'm trying to find out how that might have

5 impacted your assessment of people and events. How

6 often did you drink during the last six months?

7 A Every day.

8 Q How much would you consume in a day?

9 A Depended on the day.

10 Q I know you like martinis, what else were you

11 drinking?

12 A That's my basic drink, vodka.

13 Q The Xanax, how often would you use Xanax?

14 A Xanax was in the mornings. I took a quarter of

15 a milligram every morning. Sometimes I'd take a quarter

16 of a milligram at night to go to sleep. I wasn't -- I

17 couldn't function without taking it in the morning

18 because I had been taking it for so many years. Even at

19 that very low dosage if you don't take it it has a

20 withdrawal effect. It's a very addicting drug. But I

21 never - I never took too many of them. I think taking

22 Xanax at all over a long period of time is addictive so

23 it's not a great idea.

24 Q Any other drugs in addition to Xanax or was

25 that it?

Page 89: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 195

1 A I smoked pot on occasion on a couple of

2 weekends but I wasn't a big pot smoker, I was a drinker.

3 Q I can't imagine a big pot smoker would be

4 successful at this operation.

5 A You'd actually be amazed how many people at my

6 firm could not function without smoking pot.

7 Q I don't want to be the guy to go into that. I

8 don't want an answer or anymore information. I don't

9 want to go down that path.

10 A Okay.

11 Q So, cocaine --

12 A No.

13 Q -- was that ever used?

14 A In college.

15 Q Understood. I'm going to ask that we take a 10

16 minute break so my partner and I can get everything

17 ready to finish it up.

18 (Thereupon, a short break was taken.)

19 BY MR. FERGUSON:

20 Q Are you ready?

21 A I am, sir.

22 Q I don't have much more. My partner has just a

23 couple questions for you.

24 A Okay.

25 Q My client tells me that any money he did

Page 90: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 196

1 receive from this would have either been in wire or

2 check, that he was never given cash; is that correct?

3 A That's correct.

4 Q Okay.

5 A Not by me.

6 Q There was also in looking at the e-mail traffic

7 April of '09 before his deal flow starts, it looks like

8 there was some discussion about exclusivity where my

9 client at least thought he was going to have an

10 opportunity to be the exclusive provider of investors.

11 Do you recall that?

12 A I have a vague recollection of doing it.

13 Q I saw that there were two checks paid to him

14 for $110,000 during that time before investor one

15 begins. My client tells me that that was payment for

16 exclusivity. Do you recall that?

17 A That I would pay him for exclusivity?

18 Q At the beginning.

19 A That doesn't make any sense.

20 Q At the beginning that he got a retainer

21 agreement cut into two checks and this was before he had

22 any investors come in.

23 A David, to tell you for certain, I'd need to see

24 the e-mail traffic especially between me and Boden right

25 around that time period because I don't recall that.

Page 91: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 197

1 MR. FERGUSON: Fair enough. I want to thank

2 you for your time, Scott.

3 CROSS EXAMINATION

4 BY MR. HOUSTON:

5 Q Scott, do you recall during the 2004

6 Examination a colloquy between yourself and Mr. Lichtman

7 concerning your motivation for truthfulness?

8 A Do I recall it in detail, no. I recall the

9 conversation, yes.

10 Q Okay. You recall that he asked you if you had

11 a motivation for being truthful during these

12 proceedings. Do you recall that?

13 A I do.

14 Q Do you recall that you answered that something

15 to the effect that if you expect to get out of prison

16 before you're 85 that you would have to be truthful in

17 all respects?

18 A I said if I don't want to die in prison that I

19 must be truthful.

20 Q And can I take that to mean that you expect if

21 you're truthful that there may be some reduction in your

22 sentence?

23 A As I've testified many times I hope to get a

24 reduction, yes.

25 Q Do you know what Rule 35 is?

Page 92: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 198

1 A I do, yes, I've testified about it extensively

2 over the last two weeks.

3 Q I have read that testimony but appreciate this

4 is a separate transcript, I'm not using those

5 transcripts so --

6 MR. LICHTMAN: I'd be happy to stipulate if you

7 wish to you can.

8 MR. HOUSTON: I would prefer to ask him myself

9 since it's short.

10 BY MR. HOUSTON:

11 Q What do you understand Rule 35 to be?

12 A It is a motion that can be filed only by the

13 government upon their decision that all of my

14 cooperation constitutes substantial assistance in the

15 investigation or prosecution of criminal cases.

16 Q And is it your further understanding that

17 motion has to be filed within one year after your

18 sentencing?

19 A It's two different things, for my cooperation

20 prior to sentencing a motion needed to be filed between

21 the time that I was sentenced and one year. For all my

22 other cooperation, no.

23 Q Are you in fact aware that the government has

24 filed such a motion with the District Court?

25 A I am.

Page 93: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 199

1 Q And you've read that motion?

2 A I just read it actually the other day. I'm not

3 sure if I ever got a copy of it before that, I did hear

4 it was filed.

5 Q And it's your understanding that that's the

6 sole vehicle available to you today to achieve a

7 downward departure in your sentence; is that correct?

8 A I don't know if they call it a downward

9 departure but, yes, the sole vehicle as I understand it

10 is a Rule 35 reduction for substantial assistance.

11 Q Perhaps I should have used the word downward

12 adjustment. Are you more comfortable with that?

13 A Yes, a reduction in my sentence.

14 Q I assume you're not looking for an upward

15 increase in your sentence, right, so it has to be

16 downward?

17 A Yes.

18 Q Besides Mr. Nurik, have you had discussions

19 with anybody concerning the extent of your cooperation

20 in order to hopefully achieve a downward adjustment?

21 A Other than chatter with the people that I live

22 with, no.

23 Q And by that you mean people that are

24 incarcerated wherever you're incarcerated from time to

25 time?

Page 94: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 200

1 A Yes.

2 Q So you've not had that conversation with

3 Mr. Stettin in any respect?

4 A No, sir.

5 Q You've not had that conversation with any of

6 Mr. Stettin's professionals?

7 A No, sir.

8 Q Do you have any belief that if your assistance

9 and testimony during these last 10 days brings in more

10 money to the bankruptcy estate, that counts in

11 connection with your Rule 35 proceeding?

12 A I don't know whether it does or not. I would

13 tell you I've tried to look it up and see, but I do not

14 know whether it does or does not. The way I read Rule

15 35 is it is substantial assistance in an investigation

16 or prosecution of criminal matters.

17 Q And when you say you looked it up, does that

18 mean that you have some, in some fashion you have

19 resources, legal research resources available to you

20 wherever you are?

21 A Yes, as I testified previously I have access to

22 Lexis.

23 Q And so you've undertaken some of that research

24 on your own as opposed to asking your Counsel's advice?

25 MR. NURIK: I'm going to interpose an objection

Page 95: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 201

1 as to attorney/client privilege.

2 MR. HOUSTON: About whether he's done his own

3 research, you consider to be privileged?

4 MR. NURIK: No, but that's not your question.

5 MR. HOUSTON: I'll repeat it again, Marc.

6 BY MR. HOUSTON:

7 Q And your testimony is that you've done your own

8 legal research as opposed to seeking your Counsel's

9 legal advice?

10 MR. NURIK: I have a problem with that. Why

11 don't you just ask him if he's done his own

12 research, period? I don't have a problem with

13 that.

14 Q Have you done your own research, including any

15 research that may have been given to you by your lawyer?

16 A Including research he gave me?

17 MR. HOUSTON: That's what I tried to avoid,

18 Marc.

19 MR. NURIK: No, if you just ask him if

20 separately he's done his own research.

21 BY MR. HOUSTON:

22 Q Got it.

23 A Is that the question now, have I done my own

24 research?

25 Q Yes, sir.

Page 96: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 202

1 A Yes.

2 Q Have you come to some conclusions on whether

3 assisting the Trustee and bringing more funds into the

4 estate will count in your Rule 35 proceedings for a

5 downward adjustment?

6 A Yes.

7 Q What is your conclusion?

8 A It will not.

9 Q So, in other words, your honest and truthful -

10 at least in your understanding and your conclusion -

11 your honest and truthful testimony during these last 10

12 days of these proceedings will not benefit you by

13 achieving a downward adjustment in your sentence?

14 A It will benefit me, but I have no expectation

15 that it is going to assist me in the downward

16 departure.

17 Q So what's the benefit?

18 A I made a promise when I came back that I would

19 make sure the investors got back as much of their money

20 as possible. I want to see them all made whole, the

21 innocent investors. That's the benefit to me.

22 Q So the promise you're talking about that you

23 made was the promise that was widely publicized in the

24 blogs and the papers when you turned from Morocco?

25 A Well, I made the promise to myself and to my

Page 97: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 203

1 wife when I got back. And I verbalized the promise I

2 believe on TV when I first got back.

3 Q Okay. So then your testimony is, or your

4 understanding is that your truthfulness is being true to

5 that promise as opposed to thinking this truthful

6 assistance will contribute towards your downward

7 adjustment of your sentence; is that correct?

8 A No. Let me see if I can help you with this.

9 Q Please do.

10 A Because it's all scrambled up.

11 Q Yes.

12 A I made a conscious decision upon my final

13 decision to step back on that plane and come back here

14 and turn myself in, that I was never going to lie

15 again. I have destroyed everything that I hold near and

16 dear. I'm not talking about material things, I'm

17 talking about my family, my children, close friends, I

18 destroyed them. Good people. I destroyed lawyers in my

19 law firm, beautiful people who did not deserve the hell

20 that I brought down on them. And I just won't lie, I

21 just won't, not for any purpose, not for anyone.

22 Q So, is it your belief that the testimony you've

23 given the last 10 days has helped those people that you

24 caused such pain and misery to?

25 A No, I don't think it's helping them at all. I

Page 98: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 204

1 think just the fact that I am a better person helps

2 them.

3 Q Well, but you said that you're not going to lie

4 anymore because you hurt so many people and you don't

5 want to hurt people by lying again. Is that what you

6 said?

7 A I tried to explain my mind-set to you as to how

8 I'm functioning now as a human being as opposed to the

9 less than likeable person I was before I came back. And

10 I made a decision that I would not lie. Additionally,

11 if I lie here, regardless of whether this goes to my

12 Rule 35 or not, I am certain the government will not

13 give me a Rule 35. I have no motivation to lie at all.

14 None.

15 Q During the course of the Ponzi scheme did you

16 lie to investors?

17 A Oh, yes, make no mistake about it. You have

18 night and day. During the course of that Ponzi scheme I

19 lied to everyone including family.

20 Q Did you lie to bankers?

21 A I did.

22 Q Did you lie to your law partners?

23 A I did.

24 Q Did you lie to associates in your law firm?

25 A I did.

Page 99: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 205

1 Q Did you lie to your wife?

2 A I did.

3 Q Did you lie to your daughter?

4 A I did.

5 Q Your daughter's mother?

6 A I did.

7 Q Your parents?

8 A I did.

9 Q Judges?

10 A I did.

11 Q Police authorities?

12 A Some, yes.

13 Q And when I say lie I mean omissions to tell

14 them that you were conducting a fraudulent scheme would

15 be included as well, same answer?

16 A Yes. I, understanding that there were a lot of

17 co-conspirators in all of those facets, I lied to a lot

18 of very good, decent, innocent people.

19 Q And did you also lie during the course of your

20 early legal career as you discussed with Mr. Ferguson to

21 clients and others that were involved?

22 A I'm sure I did.

23 Q And it is your understanding that if you lie

24 concerning civil matters that gets held against you in

25 your Rule 35 proceedings?

Page 100: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 206

1 A I'm under oath.

2 Q Understood.

3 A Yes. I think it would be held against me at

4 every level. It would destroy my credibility. It would

5 destroy my credibility if I'm going to testify in

6 criminal cases.

7 Q So then is your testimony that your motivation

8 for not lying is it will affect your credibility in the

9 criminal cases which will credit against your Rule 35

10 proceeding?

11 A My motivation for not wanting to ever lie again

12 is a decision I made for myself, coupled with the fact

13 that if I lie during the course of any of these

14 proceedings, under oath or not, I will die in prison.

15 Q Now, isn't it more accurate to say that if

16 you're caught lying or proven to be lying during this

17 testimony that you will die in prison?

18 A No.

19 Q In other words, let's take an example

20 hypothetically where you say you had a conversation with

21 one person and you told them something and the only two

22 witnesses to that conversation are you and them. It's

23 unlikely you're going to get caught in that lie, is that

24 a fair enough statement?

25 A I haven't lied so I'm not going to get caught

Page 101: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 207

1 because there's no lie.

2 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

3 MR. SCHERER: Object.

4 Q Well, I'm asking hypothetically right now not

5 factually, so denying that you lied is not appropriate.

6 MR. LICHTMAN: Objection to form.

7 A I don't even understand the question.

8 Q You don't understand the question if you --

9 A I don't understand what you're trying to get

10 at.

11 MR. LICHTMAN: I don't understand the question.

12 Q I do. Scott, let me ask it a different way so

13 that you can understand.

14 A Sure.

15 Q Hypothetically, if you were to lie about a

16 conversation that you had with one other person or a

17 transaction with one other person, who is going to be

18 able to verify that you're lying?

19 A I have no idea.

20 MR. HOUSTON: Okay. I have nothing further.

21 Thanks.

22 MR. LICHTMAN: I have no further questions.

23 Before the transcript closes I would like to thank

24 the two Court Reporters who have worked very, very

25 diligently for the last two weeks, happy holidays

Page 102: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 208

1 to you.

2 COURT REPORTER: Thank you.

3 MR. LICHTMAN: Thank you to Mr. LaVecchio and

4 the U.S. Attorney's Office who made sure that we

5 can now spend Christmas with our families, because

6 then we did not have to stay in a flea bag hotel,

7 God knows where.

8 And to especially the marshals who have been

9 extremely accommodating the last two weeks, thank

10 you.

11 To all of you happy holidays. I think we're

12 done.

13 (Thereupon, the deposition was concluded at

14 12:45 p.m.)

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 103: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 209

1 C E R T I F I C A T E

2

3 STATE OF FLORIDA )

4 COUNTY OF BROWARD )

5

6 I hereby certify that I have read the foregoing

7 deposition by me given, and that the statements

8 contained herein are true and correct to the best of my

9 knowledge and belief, with the exception of any

10 corrections or notations made on the errata sheet, if

11 one was executed.

12 Dated this ____ day of ____________ , 2011.

13

14

15 _________________________________ SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 104: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 210

1 E R R A T A S H E E T

2 IN RE: HERBERT STETTIN -V- RICHARD L. PEARSON, ETC.

3 DEPOSITION OF: SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN

4 TAKEN: December 23, 2011

5 DO NOT WRITE ON TRANSCRIPT - ENTER CHANGES HERE

6 PAGE # LINE # CHANGE REASON _____________________________________________________

7 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

8 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

9 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

10 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

11 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

12 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

13 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

14 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

15 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

16 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

17 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

18 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

19 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________

20 _____________________________________________________Please forward the original signed errata sheet to this

21 office so that copies may be distributed to all parties.

22 Under penalty of perjury, I declare that I have read my deposition and that it is true and correct subject to

23 any changes in form or substance entered here.

24 DATE:_______SIGNATURE OF DEPONENT____________________

25

Page 105: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 211

1 STATE OF FLORIDA )

2 COUNTY OF BROWARD )

3

4

5 I, the undersigned authority, certify that the

6 Aforementioned witness personally appeared before me and

7 was duly sworn.

8

9 WITNESS my hand and official seal this 2e day

10 of December, 2011.

11

12

13

14 _________________________________ Terri L. Wright

15 Notary Public - State of Florida Commission No: DD 963327

16 Expiration Date: April 30, 2014

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 106: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 212

1 C E R T I F I C A T E

2

3 STATE OF FLORIDA )

4 COUNTY OF BROWARD )

5 I, Terri L. Wright, Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at Large, do hereby certify that

6 the aforementioned witness was by me first duly sworn to testify the whole truth; that I was authorized to and

7 did report said deposition in stenotype; and that the foregoing pages are a true and correct transcription of

8 my shorthand notes of said deposition.

9 I further certify that the said deposition was taken at the time and place hereinabove set forth and

10 that the taking of said deposition was commenced and completed as hereinabove set out.

11 I further certify that I am not attorney or

12 counsel of any of the parties, nor am I a relative or employee of any attorney or counsel of any party

13 connected with this action, nor am I interested in the action.

14 The foregoing certification of this transcript

15 does not apply to any reproduction of the same by any means unless under the direct control and/or direction

16 of the certifying reporter.

17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23 day of December, 2011.

18

19 ________________________________

20 Terri L. Wright Notary Public - State of Florida

21 Commission No: DD 963327 Expiration Date: April 30, 2014

22

23

24

25

Page 107: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

7f69ef9a-6fa8-4cf9-b84c-e81962c14614

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 213

1 UNITED REPORTING, INC. 1218 East 3rd Avenue

2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954) 525-2221

3

4 MARC S. NURIK, ESQUIREOne East Broward Boulevard, #700

5 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

6SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN

7

8 RE: HERBERT STETTIN -V- RICHARD L. PEARSON

9Dear Mr. Rothstein:

10 Please take notice that on December 23, 2011,

11 you gave your deposition in the above-referred matter. At that time, you did not waive your signature. It is

12 now necessary that you sign your deposition.

13 If you do not read and sign the deposition within thirty (30) days, the original which has already been

14 forwarded to the ordering attorney, may be filed with the Clerk of the Court. If you wish to waive your

15 signature, sign your name in the blank at the bottom of this letter and return it to us.

16 Very truly yours,

17 United Reporting, Inc.

18 TERRI L. WRIGHT

19 Court Reporter - Notary Public

20 I do hereby waive my signature.

21________________________________

22 SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN

23

24

25

Page 108: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 214

Aability 143:24 144:5able 148:15 193:13

193:15 207:18abovereferred

213:11absent 141:6absolutely 119:21

128:22 138:25147:14 165:21

accept 172:15access 130:22,24

131:3,7 132:8,9136:14 140:12145:25 157:25174:22 175:8,14185:17,20,21200:21

accommodating208:9

accomplish 146:25account 129:13

158:1 179:7181:25

accountants 164:1accounting 130:16

145:25accounts 129:1

131:3 174:23183:4 189:10

accuracy 168:16accurate 173:12

206:15accurately 141:21achieve 199:6,20achieving 202:13act 191:16,17acted 137:10,24action 212:13,13activity 141:6 179:1

183:23 184:2addendum 157:22addicting 194:20addictive 194:22adding 145:21

184:23addition 156:12

182:15 194:24additional 118:7

149:15 184:2,6additionally 204:10address 161:22

163:12adjusting 191:18adjustment 199:12

199:20 202:5,13203:7

adler 107:4advice 200:24 201:9advocate 171:2

193:4affect 206:8affirmatively 124:4aforementioned

211:6 212:6ago 132:3 177:23

178:11agree 134:1,15

145:11 154:8,11175:1

agreed 114:25agreement 124:1

196:21ahead 135:1 155:1

159:8 162:3,8air 193:13aj 163:9akerman 109:14al 111:6alarm 126:1alert 173:17alerted 137:13alex 110:2,3alleged 176:12allegedly 133:25

141:25allmens 163:4,8allow 157:17amazed 195:5amount 121:12

123:20 134:11145:6 147:11148:8,8 152:25166:12 179:7190:19 191:25193:12

amounts 118:9134:9 157:12174:23,24

andahalf 177:12,22178:11

angry 187:10,13,14answer 124:12

149:24 154:13155:1 158:24164:7 165:11195:8 205:15

answered 197:14answers 148:25anybody 168:23

172:1 187:6199:19

anymore 118:20119:11 138:9

156:14 195:8204:4

anyones 153:14apologize 169:6appearance 139:20appearances 108:1

108:4,12,19 109:1109:8,12,17,21110:1,4,11,14,18110:22 111:1,5,9111:12,19

appeared 136:8,11181:1 211:6

appearing 142:10152:9

appears 120:15136:13

apply 212:15appreciate 198:3appropriate 207:5approval 157:13approximate

179:17approximately

141:16april 125:16,24

136:21 137:5138:24 139:10166:25 169:22170:2 196:7211:16 212:21

arbitrage 109:1area 193:5arent 146:12argument 133:22

134:10 165:6178:19

arrested 128:9aside 183:24,25asked 117:10

137:16,21 138:8139:14 142:23158:6 160:17,22160:25 161:13162:25 163:7181:11 187:20197:10

asking 122:14129:18 140:23147:10,23 148:25151:24 152:2162:6,9 163:1164:12,15 165:24166:2 174:25175:10 178:3200:24 207:4

aspersion 192:3,4

ass 151:10assessment 194:5assessments 173:11assist 136:2 144:7

202:15assistance 198:14

199:10 200:8,15203:6

assistant 176:12assisted 138:22

176:13assisting 202:3associates 107:8

113:24 114:7,15204:24

assume 134:10159:14 165:23199:14

assuming 125:24ate 194:2atlantic 181:19atlas 109:11attack 155:4attempt 158:11

165:13attempted 143:19

161:5attention 167:1

169:19attorney 201:1

212:11,12 213:14attorneys 208:4audited 185:14,14

185:15august 169:20

170:2 172:25173:6,8

authorities 205:11authority 211:5authorization

147:24authorizations

127:14 162:5authorize 126:24

145:6 147:20authorized 212:6authorizing 126:25

127:5 146:4automatically

148:7available 178:11

199:6 200:19avenue 107:24

109:6,10,14 111:2213:1

avoid 155:5 170:7179:7 201:17

aware 126:19128:20 130:12136:7 144:24149:11 159:17162:6 163:13,19163:24 164:2172:17 177:15179:1 183:24186:15 189:25198:23

awareness 173:16

Bb 108:11back 113:5 118:11

118:14 119:6,20120:10 121:7,19121:20 122:16128:8 135:21140:6 142:6145:10 153:2,6158:10,13,18159:15 164:15171:9,22 179:11185:15 186:13187:7 191:10192:11,16,21,23193:1 202:18,19203:1,2,13,13204:9

backdating 179:18backwards 120:10bad 192:7,10badges 149:12,12

162:22 185:19bag 154:12 208:6bail 156:18bailed 174:11balances 131:7

158:1 176:2189:11

balls 193:13bank 109:17 128:25

174:22 175:2,7,14176:5 181:19

bankers 204:20banking 130:22

145:25 185:17,20185:21

bankruptcy 107:1200:10

banyon 167:21168:7

bart 109:11barzeeflores 111:7based 133:3,5

172:13 173:2,3,12

Page 109: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 215

186:14bases 136:4 160:24basic 194:12basically 152:8basket 156:19,20bat 159:20battista 108:8beam 160:6bear 169:9 172:2beautiful 203:19beckman 110:23bed 140:25began 191:7beginning 125:25

162:18,20 165:19182:3 196:18,20

begins 196:15behalf 107:16belief 200:8 203:22

209:9believe 114:21

152:2,4,5 160:5171:17 173:1183:17 187:21188:1 192:6 203:2

believed 131:2152:3 159:18,24160:6,8

believes 159:12bell 136:5benefit 202:12,14

202:17,21berga 111:3berger 108:6best 119:16,19

133:14 157:9169:1 178:15179:11 183:11185:23 190:2209:8

better 117:21 118:3118:21 184:6204:1

betweens 174:7beyond 156:7big 130:16 133:23

140:4,8 145:24166:24 185:15195:2,3

bigger 163:2,9bill 191:18billing 110:19biscayne 109:3,3

110:12bit 192:9black 110:17blackberry 118:13

blank 213:15block 161:22,23,25blog 186:11 187:5blogs 202:24blow 174:10blower 123:25

124:3 126:18blowing 130:18blvd 109:18 110:19board 177:1bob 186:10,15

187:4boca 110:9boden 113:7,14

114:24 116:7117:5,17 118:8,11118:14,16 119:1120:7,25 122:9123:8,12 124:2126:9,15,25 127:7127:9 128:8 129:6129:9,20,20 131:3131:6,9,10,23132:4,6,8,9,13,18135:11,16,17136:6,25 137:9,10137:20,24 138:3138:14,16,21,24139:11,14,15140:17,19,21,25141:2,9 142:1,7142:20,24 143:2,4143:6,23,25 144:3144:5,8 145:14,14147:19,24,25150:16 151:5,6155:14 157:17158:7 160:22,25161:8,9 163:20164:25 166:14168:9,16,21,24170:17,22 175:8177:5 179:16182:13,16 184:9185:7,21 187:5,10190:3,9,15,20196:24

bodens 142:5 158:9bodner 111:19bogus 176:2book 193:6boston 110:24bother 146:2

170:11bothered 174:6bottom 120:4

153:15 169:17

170:6 213:15boulevard 108:2,6

108:17,20 109:3110:12 213:4

bova 129:21 130:5181:17 187:22,24190:7

brain 134:14branch 189:10branches 176:6brauser 138:20

139:2breach 151:2

152:10break 175:24 177:7

177:8 195:16,18brickell 111:2,14,17bright 133:21

146:17,19,21148:3 178:16,19178:22

bring 130:19bringing 133:6

179:2 202:3brings 165:24 200:9broad 131:13brought 136:6

137:9 159:19163:16 165:16,18181:2 186:2203:20

broward 108:2,20209:4 211:2 212:4213:4

brushed 129:25building 107:19

135:22 137:1,15137:21 141:17,23159:22

bulk 132:11bump 121:11

144:18,19 146:6148:1

bumped 144:19business 136:8

173:20,21 181:5,8businesslike 153:25

154:3businessman

136:13 137:1177:19

Cc 108:10 209:1,1

212:1,1call 114:23 119:11

128:11 185:19

199:8called 119:12

149:19calling 128:7

131:10,10 166:14candidly 153:5

154:14cant 124:15 126:11

128:5 134:6 139:1139:8 140:16,17145:8 153:13161:17 165:5168:15 173:9175:24 179:19184:10 186:20195:3

capable 167:5capital 110:11car 181:18care 113:18 146:3

172:18career 205:20caretsky 110:18

176:4carl 182:18 183:12carrying 174:15case 107:2 123:25

124:3,4,5,15,17148:19 164:5170:24,25 178:23193:7

cases 198:15 206:6206:9

casey 110:13cash 191:15 192:15

192:18 196:2cast 192:3,4catastrophic 166:25caught 206:16,23

206:25caused 203:24cave 159:20cc 150:15cced 151:6cell 119:5center 181:19centurion 109:1certain 127:1,11

143:16 176:3196:23 204:12

certainly 127:9129:22 144:5166:1 178:6186:25 188:19189:12

certification 212:14certify 209:6 211:5

212:5,9,11certifying 212:16chain 120:4 169:14

169:15chamber 158:18chamorro 111:4change 118:13

146:6 148:4149:10 210:6

changed 121:19134:19,19 157:12171:23 174:24190:10,12,14

changes 210:5,23changing 115:19

124:14,17chapter 107:2,5,16

108:4characterization

133:3,6characterizing

133:1charles 108:7chase 109:23chatter 199:21check 119:4 137:25

144:4 183:11,12190:3 196:2

checking 130:17checks 196:13,21children 203:17chill 151:3 156:10christmas 208:5christopher 111:3chuck 131:10,22

150:1 159:1cimo 108:10circumstance

166:24civil 205:24claim 134:12claims 137:13classic 133:5clausin 109:23clear 115:3 127:25

128:6,12 131:13132:4 139:10141:1 149:13152:24 153:21170:20,25 171:3176:23 177:18182:11 185:7186:4

clearly 151:9156:10 170:16,17171:6,6 185:8,15185:18

Page 110: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 216

clerk 213:14client 127:13 136:6

137:1 151:5,16170:18 176:6177:14,18 179:2181:23 183:3,23189:24 190:11191:16 192:15193:4 195:25196:9,15 201:1

clients 134:4 140:2158:19 171:13172:11 173:1,19192:19 205:21

cloaked 149:13162:21

clockwork 163:9close 155:3 203:17closes 207:23clue 148:6 188:15coast 136:3cocaine 195:11cochran 110:19coconspirator

149:21 156:24157:4 166:1,3170:10

coconspirators155:9 171:7205:17

cold 109:5college 195:14collide 178:25collides 178:20colloquy 197:6columbia 109:22combined 167:4come 114:9 136:20

159:14 161:12,16196:22 202:2203:13

comes 125:16136:12

comfort 171:17comfortable 199:12coming 125:8

132:14 135:13140:2 142:4148:22 170:7172:24,24 173:1187:7

commenced 212:10comments 186:23commingled 132:22commission 134:13

145:19 211:15212:21

committee 109:12communicate 135:9communicated

135:3communicating

151:6communication

126:19 151:5153:9

communications119:17

companies 163:15company 109:21

110:1 113:23154:7

complaint 131:22completed 158:3

212:10completely 135:8

168:20,22comported 152:15compound 154:23computer 144:1,4

175:16concept 148:16concern 160:24concerned 118:19

151:18 181:11,14concerning 197:7

199:19 205:24concluded 208:13conclusion 114:9

202:7,10conclusions 202:2condition 188:8,11conduct 191:8,8conducting 205:14confidence 158:16confident 151:12,15confidential 142:19

168:13confidentiality

151:2 152:10159:13 161:18

confirm 184:8,12189:11

conflict 139:23140:14 141:1,6

confront 188:23confronted 189:13confronting 189:1connected 212:13connection 200:11conrad 108:13conscious 203:12consent 157:14consider 201:3

considered 134:13constitutes 198:14consume 194:8contact 119:21,22

145:4contacted 175:1contacting 174:25contained 209:8contents 126:8,12context 187:6continue 159:10continued 112:3

113:1 133:16166:17

contract 136:4contribute 203:6control 132:6,7,8

143:21 212:15controlled 132:19controlling 135:11

135:16,18conversation

131:21 136:24142:21 157:14162:13 172:16177:2 179:11180:21,23 181:16182:4,10,13,25197:9 200:2,5206:20,22 207:16

conversations132:1 145:24149:10 181:6,15181:17,18 183:18

convince 182:6convinced 155:21cook 162:11cool 127:23cooperation 198:14

198:19,22 199:19copies 160:25

210:21copy 199:3coquinas 163:4,8coral 108:18 110:3corporation 107:9correct 131:15,19

136:22 139:17,19139:22,24 140:1,3140:5 150:23154:18 155:15156:4 166:14,21166:22 168:25169:24,25 176:13177:19 186:15191:5 196:2,3199:7 203:7 209:8

210:22 212:7correcting 120:20corrections 209:10corresponding

152:16costing 122:22cotzen 111:13,15couldnt 143:7 146:5

158:20 161:4174:6 193:7194:17

counsel 145:13147:20 212:12,12

counsels 200:24201:8

count 202:4country 118:20

119:2 153:23154:20 155:4156:7 188:3,17,19189:17,21,25

counts 200:10county 209:4 211:2

212:4couple 124:20

177:12 195:1,23coupled 206:12course 115:8 149:9

183:21 193:18204:15,18 205:19206:13

court 107:1 198:24207:24 208:2213:14,19

courtroom 107:20cover 153:14 176:4

176:4covering 151:10

160:24craig 110:20crazy 155:19create 146:13created 114:23,24

127:7,8 157:16,21creating 184:22,24credibility 206:4,5

206:8credit 206:9creditors 109:13crew 136:1crime 157:24

191:19 192:11criminal 191:8,8,16

191:17 198:15200:16 206:6,9

criminality 191:1191:13

cross 112:4,4124:22 161:21,21161:22 166:5187:15 197:3

crossed 191:1curtis 109:5cusick 110:13cut 196:21cya 114:23 115:4

146:10,21 151:8151:16 153:9157:16 162:5

cyaing 147:5

Dd 109:17daniel 110:21data 117:18date 107:17 190:25

210:24 211:16212:21

dated 112:8,9,10,11112:12,13,14,15113:8 116:6 120:3122:9 209:12

dates 111:8daughter 205:3daughters 205:5dave 158:7david 108:10

111:19 116:7122:12 123:12,19124:25 125:11127:9 128:7,8,11131:23 138:11139:8 145:4149:17,23 150:15157:17 158:9160:22,25 161:8,9161:10,12,16165:13,15,22166:7,12 167:13170:17,22 173:16175:11,17 177:5179:16 180:18,20187:5,10 196:23

davids 113:19117:13 174:13

day 113:15 116:13119:17 131:7148:14 150:24152:20 155:12,15171:11 187:23,24188:6 190:7 194:7194:8,9 199:2204:18 209:12211:9 212:17

Page 111: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 217

days 120:5 139:5158:9 200:9202:12 203:23213:13

dd 211:15 212:21de 108:17deal 113:21,22

114:5,12 115:6,12118:9 120:20121:12,18,19122:10,13,14,22123:9,11,14,15124:17,17 126:16126:17 133:24134:1 135:4,14,17142:2 143:25145:8 146:6,14147:6,9,11 148:10154:5 157:12158:2 165:1166:17 169:24177:11,22 178:10181:8 186:1,3190:10 196:7

dealing 138:11178:20

deals 120:16 129:8129:24 135:12136:8 144:18,19144:20 148:2,5154:21 163:3,9,10166:7 170:7174:24,24 175:4,5181:8 185:10186:8

dear 203:16 213:9deb 135:19 142:5

143:12,15 144:7166:8

debra 123:8,12143:10 171:12

debs 142:6december 107:17

210:4 211:10212:17 213:10

decent 193:3 205:18decide 117:2decision 172:13

198:13 203:12,13204:10 206:12

declare 191:16192:17 210:22

dedicated 168:17deeming 152:14defendant 107:10

133:25 134:3142:9

defendants 139:18140:4,8 158:19174:22

definitely 136:23143:15

definition 133:5delaware 113:23denis 182:18 183:12denying 207:5departure 156:2

199:7,9 202:16depended 194:9deponent 210:24deposition 107:12

208:13 209:7210:3,22 212:7,8212:9,10 213:11213:12,13

describe 188:8deserve 203:19despondent 156:7destroy 206:4,5destroyed 203:15

203:18,18detail 197:8detailed 151:11

154:3detailing 185:3detailoriented

154:4detect 173:21determine 128:18

166:11deutsch 110:8,10diaz 111:2didnt 125:25 126:2

126:4 128:14132:10 138:7141:8 143:2,3144:6 151:12,16152:17,19 158:8160:11,13,18161:5,14 164:11171:25 173:7,24174:3,8 175:5,23176:24,25 178:6182:4 188:19189:17 191:19

die 197:18 206:14206:17

difference 113:24114:14 121:8

different 128:22151:4 154:8,18,21190:14 192:25198:19 207:12

difficult 169:8

diligence 130:21157:19,21,23160:14,15 161:4162:18,19,23163:3,10,12,14,15163:22 164:1,4,10164:14,16,19165:12,14

diligently 207:25direct 112:3 129:16

145:17 212:15directed 183:16,17direction 143:10

212:15directly 128:2 144:9

145:18 188:16disclose 125:25disclosed 114:17

144:8disclosing 131:17

145:20disclosures 180:14discrepancies

140:21discuss 183:15discussed 182:14

183:1 205:20discussion 143:8

157:14 167:15172:19 196:8

discussions 140:17199:18

dissatisfied 167:21167:24

distracted 181:10distributed 210:21district 107:1

198:24divers 110:15diverted 167:1dixie 110:2document 117:6

126:24 127:6139:6 144:25145:16 146:3,24147:3 162:5169:10,17 172:16

documents 123:13123:24 126:11134:7,7 135:11,17135:18 141:25142:4,6 143:25144:9,11 146:11146:12,14,15157:8 158:3,9162:7,9,13 184:22190:10,12,13,14

190:16doesnt 124:2 129:12

134:6 147:13178:6 189:12191:16 196:19

doing 118:21124:24 131:18142:3 144:3145:21 146:10147:7 148:7 153:4153:7 158:4 159:3162:18,23 166:2,7167:7 171:22184:12 196:12

dollars 180:10181:23,24 182:5

donna 109:20dont 113:18 114:21

118:12,18 119:3119:12,13,22120:15 122:8,20126:7,19 127:8,24128:9 129:22131:1 135:12138:9 140:11,20140:23 141:9,15144:4,25 145:18152:19,20 153:7156:5 158:22,23160:8 163:17,23164:21 165:4,17166:6,10 168:11168:12 170:23172:6,18 173:20176:3,9 177:25178:17 179:25180:7,20,25182:17,24 183:8184:13 186:9,18186:19,20 187:5,8188:7 189:1,14,19189:22 190:22193:22 194:19195:7,8,8,22196:25 197:18199:8 200:12201:11,12 203:25204:4 207:7,8,9207:11

door 158:20 159:15160:2,3

doors 158:13,21dosage 194:19downward 199:7,8

199:11,16,20202:5,13,15 203:6

draft 154:8

drafted 138:20drafting 138:22

139:6drank 194:2drawn 169:19drink 194:6,12drinker 195:2drinking 194:11drive 110:23drivers 161:1driving 181:18dropped 127:25drug 194:20drugs 193:25

194:24due 117:14 130:20

157:19,21,23160:14,15 161:3162:18,19,23163:3,10,12,14,15163:22 164:1,4,10164:14,16,19165:11,14 166:25

duly 211:7 212:6dummy 133:21

Ee 109:4 209:1,1

210:1,1,1 212:1,1earlier 115:13

139:14early 124:21 156:1

158:5 161:2162:13 165:14205:20

easier 129:17easily 145:2east 108:2,6,20

109:18 110:19213:1,4

eating 190:8edits 168:8effect 138:9 194:20

197:15effectuate 143:17effort 168:16eighth 108:14eisinger 191:12

192:22either 138:4 145:4

160:25 182:21196:1

elements 191:13elevator 159:16eliot 109:7email 112:8,9,10,11

112:12,13,14,15

Page 112: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 218

113:7,11,14,19114:22 115:2,12116:18,20 119:21120:3,3,7 121:1,6122:9 123:8,10126:8,12 127:21131:1 134:18135:9 139:8143:14 144:22147:23 149:25150:13,20 151:1,4151:11,13,17,25152:21 153:11,16154:9,9 155:13,13157:5,8 165:3168:3 169:6,14,17169:20 170:6172:6 173:2177:17 183:12185:2 186:4 189:3189:4,4,13,21,23190:1,3 196:6,24

emails 143:12,15144:22 145:3150:12 152:13153:2,3 154:1,1,4154:5,20 155:7,9170:19,21 171:5171:24 172:2177:10 185:7,10185:11,18

emergency 136:4emess 110:11employee 212:12encounter 135:22

187:21endeavor 183:9ended 122:22enforcement 191:4

192:12engage 129:25engaged 179:2

183:24 191:7193:23

enter 210:5entered 210:23entire 132:10

151:24 167:7185:13

entrances 158:14159:23

entry 117:16,16equivalent 155:10eric 108:15errata 209:10

210:20especially 134:7

189:2 196:24208:8

esq 111:7esquie 109:20esquire 108:3,7,10

108:10,11,11,15108:15,16,18,21109:4,7,7,11,11109:15,16,19,20109:24 110:3,7,7110:10,13,17,20110:21,24 111:3,4111:8,11,15,15,17111:21 213:4

establish 184:21establishing 185:8

185:10,18estate 200:10 202:4estates 123:11,13et 111:6evans 109:20events 194:5eventually 133:15everybody 151:7

153:10 170:15evidence 172:16exact 122:12 128:16

166:6exactly 149:22

152:12 166:11170:13 174:17

examination 107:22112:1 124:22145:17 197:3,6

examine 191:10,24192:2

example 191:13206:19

examples 129:16exception 209:9exclusive 196:10exclusivity 196:8,16

196:17exculpatory 171:8excuse 115:10

160:12executed 134:2,2

141:25 209:11exhibit 112:6 113:2

113:7 116:6,10119:24 120:2,21120:24 121:3,6122:4,8 123:3,4,8125:1 126:6,7128:19 150:1,3,5169:2 189:7

exhibited 191:14

exhibits 116:2exist 133:18 157:15existed 134:15existence 174:20,21exists 162:1exit 159:20expand 124:11expect 135:13 145:9

154:19 197:15,20expectation 202:14expected 163:13,21expecting 156:14expiration 211:16

212:21explain 122:18

144:16 204:7explode 184:19exploded 153:22extend 136:4extensively 198:1extent 132:5 153:18

156:17 176:19181:14 192:15199:19

external 157:8extreme 193:12extremely 181:9

208:9eyes 161:24,25

Ff 209:1 212:1face 186:14facets 205:17fact 114:17 125:16

127:17,21 128:16129:6 135:25136:20 138:20163:15 167:4,19177:22 185:12187:23 192:4198:23 204:1206:12

factually 207:5fair 116:14 119:15

128:10 136:14,18139:10 141:1,20156:23 170:4172:12 177:18185:25 187:3197:1 206:24

fairness 164:12166:23

fake 114:23,24117:13 124:19146:15 157:16176:5 184:22

false 127:14 162:2176:7

familiar 116:18126:16 182:19

familiarity 183:2families 208:5family 203:17

204:19far 160:2 184:14

185:20fashion 171:8

200:18favor 153:4,7faxing 118:14federal 107:18

108:14 110:1fee 121:8 123:16

127:5,14 134:12144:11,13 145:6145:19 146:4190:11

feel 173:6fees 126:24,25

157:16 162:5165:1

feet 141:19feigned 138:16fepict 110:22ferguson 109:9

112:4 124:23128:7 132:17133:12 134:24135:20 142:22146:16,20 147:16148:12,22,23149:7,25 150:7151:23 154:17,25158:25 159:7164:23 165:7167:10,18 169:4172:9 174:1 175:6176:11,16 177:6,9178:8 186:25195:19 197:1205:20

field 175:10figure 117:11

155:18 185:2file 115:5 146:3,22

147:5filed 198:12,17,20

198:24 199:4213:14

files 125:10 139:25146:14 147:2,3

fill 167:22final 168:11 203:12

financial 166:16financials 185:14find 153:23 164:11

170:23 194:4finder 157:16finders 144:11,13

145:6,19finds 167:13fine 128:11finish 134:22

151:22 162:7163:6,7 195:17

finished 146:18158:23

fire 110:14firm 130:17 137:15

145:13,25 183:9191:12,22 192:22195:6 203:19204:24

firms 191:12 192:22first 113:10,18

120:5 131:20,25135:21 136:12138:12 143:23154:11 155:15167:6,19 168:18178:13 179:13180:21 186:8190:25 191:7203:2 212:6

five 113:22 149:10170:2

fix 117:21 118:4fixing 118:15fl 213:5flagler 111:6,10flat 142:24flea 208:6flee 125:17fleeing 155:11

188:19 189:17floor 108:14,17

109:14,23 110:6110:12,19,23111:2 141:12,14

floors 141:22142:12 158:17

florida 107:1,9,20107:24 108:3,7,9108:14,18,21109:4,10,15,19110:3,6,13,16,20111:3,7,11,14,18136:4 181:9,21209:3 211:1,15212:3,5,20 213:2

Page 113: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 219

floridan 110:9flow 126:16 166:17

169:24 196:7flowing 154:22flying 142:9focus 113:10 120:5

148:13,24 167:13focused 166:24followed 161:10followup 189:12fool 173:22foot 129:22,23

130:5 141:21footage 141:16foregoing 209:6

212:7,14forget 181:20forgive 116:3form 132:16 133:8

135:15 142:16146:9 147:1,22148:20 149:5154:16,23 164:20167:2,16 171:19173:13 174:18176:8,15 178:4,14178:24 180:8186:23 188:10193:17 207:2,6210:23

fort 107:24 108:3,7108:14,21 109:10109:19 110:6,20213:2,5

forth 153:2 171:22185:15 212:9

forward 210:20forwarded 134:3

213:14forwarding 165:15found 130:21foundation 165:2four 123:15 130:16

145:24 154:24185:15

fourth 107:19frame 179:17frank 111:9,12

170:17 189:6,9frankly 153:14fraud 149:11,12,13

149:23 152:6158:8 160:10161:15 162:20,22171:6 172:7,20,21174:16 184:23,24185:19 191:20

193:1fraudulent 205:14frazzled 188:12freaking 152:6frequent 163:2frequently 142:1

160:10friday 107:17friend 183:3friends 203:17front 129:20 146:24

148:18 158:20182:18 189:2

frontend 133:6full 126:1 139:11

171:5 173:17,20fully 185:13fun 172:1function 167:3

194:17 195:6functioning 173:15

204:8fund 120:10,11

121:7,19,20 129:8170:7 181:8

funded 122:14163:10

funder 122:17funding 123:20,20

125:23 134:11139:12 163:2167:22 168:13169:23

funds 118:7 132:6137:2 166:24167:25 168:5202:3

furnished 115:5further 180:23

198:16 207:20,22212:9,11

future 152:15

Gg 111:3gables 108:18 110:3gabriel 109:7game 171:15 184:17

186:6gelber 110:21general 145:13

147:20generalities 129:17generally 116:21generate 143:24generated 126:24

144:2 168:21,22

genovese 108:8,10george 110:7

155:21 156:3,19156:21,22

getting 114:19116:2 131:14135:14 147:17,20155:10 164:25170:3 192:20

gibraltar 111:5give 114:25 122:12

129:16 150:9157:5 183:20190:17,23 204:13

given 126:10 157:23196:2 201:15203:23 209:7

giving 174:9glades 110:9go 113:21 129:4

135:1,5 137:25140:6 148:14151:24 155:1159:8 160:21162:3,8 167:12171:9 181:19184:13 186:17191:10 192:21194:16 195:7,9

god 208:7goes 162:23 191:17

204:11going 116:1 117:1

118:15,24 120:11121:25 123:1,2126:17 127:21133:2,10 134:11134:25 135:3137:25 140:6,19142:5,6 143:22145:11,15 146:23148:4,15,19149:14,22 151:7151:10 153:16154:20 155:5,6,10155:25 159:1160:19 161:18162:22 163:3164:8 167:14168:9 169:5 172:1172:14,20,24173:5,10,21174:10,20 177:4,6178:2 180:15182:11 184:19192:23 194:3195:15 196:9

200:25 202:15203:14 204:3206:5,23,25207:17

goldberg 109:15goldstein 109:2good 117:23 118:5

124:25 146:22153:16 162:24173:6 193:2203:18 205:18

goodfella 186:10gotten 179:21government 108:19

179:23 180:15183:5 198:13,23204:12

grand 154:6,6grant 140:19great 161:3 191:13

194:23greed 192:9greenberg 109:18group 110:22growth 109:1guarantee 186:8guess 169:1 177:25

178:15guessing 118:24

178:5,15gun 146:24guy 125:8,13

126:15 133:21145:14 146:8,17146:21 148:4178:16,19 195:7

guys 121:7 181:20

Hh 108:7,10 110:13

210:1hadnt 155:16

160:23 177:24178:11

hand 138:25 139:5144:16 168:24211:9 212:17

handle 145:15handling 179:22hang 125:3 156:9hanging 129:21happen 134:7,16

161:19happened 167:7happening 176:25happens 134:4happy 198:6 207:25

208:11harassment 124:1,4

126:18hard 169:18 172:2

174:9harley 108:18harvey 111:21hasnt 151:21havent 160:17

206:25head 118:24 147:17hear 131:21 137:18

199:3heard 131:20,25

137:9 160:1hearsay 116:23heart 155:3heck 155:18hed 151:11hedge 167:13,25heightened 173:16held 205:24 206:3hell 184:10 203:19help 119:9,11,13

180:5 183:9 203:8helped 125:9

136:23 139:2203:23

helping 176:25193:14 203:25

helps 204:1herb 107:5herbert 108:5 210:2

213:8hereinabove 212:9

212:10heres 133:9,20

141:24 164:2hereunto 212:17hertzberg 109:7hes 120:20 122:21

124:14,16 130:5133:21,21 134:8134:11 135:22140:14 144:23146:21 148:7151:18 162:20165:24,25 166:1,3169:22 170:2201:2,11,20

hey 172:7,20hidden 179:6high 120:12highlight 171:10highlighted 169:7highway 108:14

110:2

Page 114: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 220

hired 163:15 164:9164:9

history 186:17hofrichter 110:2,3hold 113:9 165:11

169:7 203:15holding 146:23holidays 207:25

208:11holly 109:19honest 202:9,11hope 117:21 118:4

156:2,5 197:23hoped 167:22hopeful 155:14

168:4hopefully 199:20hopes 156:11hopped 154:12hotel 208:6hour 130:23,24hours 131:3,7 134:1

159:1house 136:9houston 109:11

112:4 114:1,4,11114:20 115:18,24116:22,24 117:7117:25 118:6,17120:14 121:10,17122:19 124:6,13197:4 198:8,10201:2,5,6,17,21207:20

houtkin 122:10hows 172:20huberfeld 111:19human 204:8humanly 155:5hundred 146:6hurt 204:4,5hypothetically

206:20 207:4,15

Iid 149:25 178:15

189:9 192:21194:15 196:23198:6

idea 138:2 184:22184:25 186:4194:23 207:19

identification 113:3116:11 119:25120:22 122:5123:5 150:6 169:3

identify 164:18

ii 107:14,14ill 114:22 128:10

133:14 154:11169:19 185:19190:19 201:5

illegal 179:1 183:23184:2

illogical 160:5im 116:1 118:15,24

123:2 124:20125:24 126:12127:11,21 128:7128:11,12,18129:19 133:24135:3 138:10,11140:6,19 141:4142:3 148:15,25151:24 152:2153:7,23 158:25159:1 160:19164:2,12 165:8169:5,13,19170:22,23,25171:2,3,11 178:2178:3 185:24187:1,14,22190:13 193:6194:3,4 195:15198:4 199:2200:25 203:16,16204:8 205:22206:1,5,25 207:4

imagine 127:9173:9 175:24195:3

impacted 194:5imploding 125:21implosion 136:21

166:25important 193:11impossibility 134:5impossible 184:21inadequate 166:2incarcerated

199:24,24incentive 166:16include 191:15,18included 205:15including 117:13

158:18 201:14,16204:19

incorporated123:12,13

increase 115:22145:19 148:9154:5 199:15

increased 121:20

123:19 130:20134:18 147:6

increasing 118:9121:12 130:20

inculpatory 171:25independent 119:3index 112:1,6indication 157:13

174:10,15 179:21indications 128:3indicators 162:21indicia 149:13indirectly 188:17individually 193:14individuals 141:22infamous 186:10information 130:22

132:9 149:16175:9 195:8

informed 172:13initiate 143:19innocent 135:8

153:12,19 156:18202:21 205:18

input 167:8inquiring 130:7insanity 116:25inside 145:14

147:17instances 127:1instruct 143:17,19instructing 147:10instructions 143:16

145:3insurance 109:21

109:22 110:1integrally 125:11interaction 133:16interest 117:13interested 212:13internal 145:19internally 141:2international

133:25interpose 200:25interposing 187:1interrupt 170:20intimately 126:16introduce 126:3,4introduced 189:6,8

189:16introspection 192:1

193:2invest 175:5 182:3invested 184:9

185:9investigation

198:15 200:15investing 175:4investment 137:15

147:12 148:3154:15 157:20,22

investments 113:23114:6,18 138:17139:11

investor 114:6115:8,9,23 121:13137:2 142:3 147:8147:8 163:19164:18,24 184:25185:4,8,8,9196:14

investors 115:6117:11,12 118:8130:15,16 131:14131:15,17 132:5,6132:13,14,20,20132:23 133:4,4138:10 153:20156:12,15,18157:11,18,19,25163:14,16,24164:13 165:16,18165:25 166:13174:15,16,17179:2 184:8 185:7185:12,16,24186:2,5 190:19,20196:10,22 202:19202:21 204:16

involved 125:11128:15 152:6153:1,1,22 169:22170:14,16,18171:23 176:18178:21,22 181:7192:13 205:21

involvement 133:2166:8

involving 139:12irene 143:13,15,17irs 179:22isnt 156:19 159:18

164:8 166:23171:18 206:15

issue 182:22 183:3183:4,15

issues 130:20159:13 182:20193:8

ivan 108:16ive 113:16 119:19

119:20 133:13146:7 158:14

159:1 171:1 191:6191:25 197:23198:1 200:13

Jj 108:16 111:4,15

111:16,17jack 110:24jail 155:6 180:16james 107:18

110:17jan 109:11jcvv 113:22 114:6

114:17jesus 108:11jet 155:10jewelers 109:8job 166:2 193:11joblove 108:8john 108:10 110:7join 172:1joking 129:23 130:9

161:23jonathan 109:16jr 110:17 111:16,17judge 148:18judges 205:9judgment 152:22judiciary 192:13july 170:2jump 116:1 154:19

159:2juncture 180:24june 120:3,4,7,24

122:9 170:2jury 148:18justice 107:19

Kk 146:7kaplan 110:12katzen 110:12keechl 109:9keep 124:21 172:3

184:23 193:13,15keeps 184:19kept 181:12key 177:21kind 124:14 129:22

155:19 160:2,6168:13 184:3

king 107:18kleinfeld 182:19

183:13kluger 110:12knew 124:4 126:8

127:13,17 128:21

Page 115: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 221

128:23,25 129:3133:15,16 137:10137:16,25 138:14139:11 140:11147:14 149:1,14149:15,17 152:5153:12,15 155:24159:22 161:14162:2,4,20,22163:17 170:22,23172:10,22 173:4,5173:7 174:7,19176:1,7,20 177:4185:21,24 189:19189:22

knock 159:25 160:1184:18

know 114:17118:12,16,18,20119:9,12,22120:13 121:9122:1 126:7,10,19126:21 127:8128:24 129:4,12130:10 131:2,4134:6,14 135:7137:3,11 138:1,16139:4,15 140:9,11140:20,20 141:9142:11,14 143:1,6144:2,8,24 145:12146:1,5,25 147:13147:14,18 148:4148:14 149:1153:7 156:17157:7 158:8,16159:13 160:8,11161:10,16,24163:17,23 164:21164:24 165:5,17168:12,20 169:18170:16,23,24172:14,21 173:7174:3,4,8,13175:7,12,21 176:3176:6,9,24,25177:14 178:17179:24 180:4,20182:21 183:2184:16 186:2,7,20187:6,20 188:16188:25 189:17,19189:22 190:2,10191:17,25 193:14194:3,10 197:25199:8 200:12,14

knowing 126:14

131:5 140:24141:10 177:16

knowingly 176:13178:21

knowledge 127:6,12127:16 140:25141:4,5 144:5157:12 161:12173:3 175:11,23176:1 185:23187:17 189:24209:9

known 140:13148:16,17 149:2172:12 173:25174:3 189:20

knows 124:18 130:6139:15,18 170:11208:7

kopas 108:16kopelowitz 109:9kozyak 108:17

Ll 109:24 111:13

113:24 114:6,14115:1 123:16127:5 210:2211:14 212:5,20213:8,18

lack 184:6language 171:7

172:4large 137:14,14

167:13 212:5las 108:6 109:18

110:19 136:9lasts 125:17late 171:15lauderdale 107:24

108:3,7,14,21109:10,19 110:6110:20 213:2,5

lauer 109:7lavecchio 108:21

186:24 187:1208:3

law 108:2 110:8137:14 191:3,3,11192:12 203:19204:22,24

lawrence 107:18108:21

lawyer 137:14140:14 177:19,20179:21,24 191:9191:15 201:15

lawyers 136:2163:25 192:12,16193:2 203:18

layer 149:2leave 150:24 154:19

188:3leaving 188:17led 159:15left 116:14 119:1,16

119:18 125:2155:4,12,15 156:7187:10,23,24189:21

legal 135:25 149:12192:2,3 200:19201:8,9 205:20

legit 140:4,8legitimate 134:10

136:8,11,13 145:1145:2 152:9

legitimately 151:16159:11

leon 108:17letter 114:23,25

115:4 136:3144:12,13 145:1146:21 151:8,10151:16 176:4,5190:11 213:15

letters 126:23157:16 179:20

level 206:4levels 193:1levin 155:21 156:13

162:19levine 110:12levinsons 109:8lexis 200:22liability 113:23license 161:1lichtman 108:7

112:3 113:4 114:2114:8,16 115:7,20115:25 116:12,23117:3,8 118:2,10118:22 120:1,17120:23 121:14,22122:6,25 123:6124:8,20 131:22132:16 133:8135:15 142:16146:9,18 147:1,22148:20 149:5150:2,4 154:16,23158:23 164:20165:2 167:2,16171:19 173:13

174:18 178:4,14178:24 180:8188:10 193:17197:6 198:6 207:2207:6,11,22 208:3

lie 167:20 174:17203:14,20 204:3204:10,11,13,16204:20,22,24205:1,3,13,19,23206:11,13,23207:1,15

lied 157:11,19,25165:19,22,25174:20,21,22,23175:2,4 204:19205:17 206:25207:5

lies 130:15life 139:1 173:9

191:24light 153:15likeable 204:9liked 171:24limited 153:18linder 182:18

183:12line 153:20 166:5

210:6lines 130:24list 140:6 157:3

160:19,21literally 125:20

145:8 173:18little 117:22 118:4

151:4 167:8 169:8192:9

live 199:21llc 109:1 110:11

113:23llp 108:13 109:5loads 128:3lobby 158:16

172:23locked 189:10long 125:13 139:5

169:7 194:22look 113:13 116:5

119:14 120:18122:7 143:14144:1 147:2152:21,24 165:3166:10 169:5177:17 178:6179:19 192:11200:13

looked 172:17

177:10 200:17looking 128:19

157:7 164:14167:21 193:1196:6 199:14

looks 118:11 122:20196:7

loop 141:3,5lose 127:24 135:4losing 170:7lot 141:18 148:15

152:13 155:7205:16,17

loud 113:18love 117:21low 194:19lunch 187:21,24

188:2,5,9,21189:15 190:8

lure 157:11lydecker 111:2lying 125:24 130:19

138:18 147:7165:18 171:17,18174:14 204:5206:8,16,16207:18

lyles 110:19lynch 163:16 164:9

164:10

Mm 107:18,18 108:11

110:7,10 117:17120:8 208:14

ma 110:24machine 146:24magnitude 193:24mail 191:20,20major 151:2 174:16

181:20making 122:23

131:9 133:22165:6 172:13184:20

malletprevost109:5

man 138:24 139:1145:13

manhattan 109:23manner 191:25marc 108:2,3 201:5

201:18 213:4marina 110:23marine 110:14mark 109:20

111:19 149:25

Page 116: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 222

marked 113:2,7116:10 119:24120:2,21 122:4123:4,7 150:5169:2

markedly 154:18154:21

marshal 156:12marshals 208:8martinis 194:10mary 111:7match 149:20matches 149:22material 203:16matter 128:15

148:1 155:24213:11

matters 200:16205:24

matthew 111:8mean 115:10

117:24 118:3129:13 130:6148:3 151:12,16152:24,24 153:21154:14 157:6171:25 173:6,9174:6 191:24192:25 193:14197:20 199:23200:18 205:13

meaning 114:18means 121:9 212:15meant 118:16

122:18medium 119:6meet 142:14,15,23

143:7 181:19meeting 183:14

189:5meltdown 126:2members 192:13mental 173:8

188:11mentioned 190:9merrill 163:16

164:9,10messages 179:21met 125:23 167:19

183:18method 155:11methodology 172:3miami 107:20 108:9

109:4,15 110:13111:3,7,11,14,18

michael 109:15111:1,15,15

128:17middle 113:13,20

120:25 121:3171:9 184:23

miguel 111:4mike 170:16miller 109:23 111:6milligram 194:15

194:16million 123:15

136:10 170:7173:19 184:9185:9 186:1,6

millions 180:10181:22,24

mills 110:15mind 153:5 156:19

156:22,23,25157:3 186:19190:25 192:14

mindset 204:7minute 127:22

129:7 165:11177:7 195:16

minutes 124:20171:12 191:18

miraculously159:25 160:1

misery 203:24missed 170:12

178:17mistake 204:17mix 145:22mode 136:21

173:23moment 118:19

130:10 137:24138:10 156:6186:24

money 117:11121:13 122:22,23122:23 123:21126:2 128:25129:7,13 131:9,14132:14,14,19,20132:21,21,22133:4,7 134:17136:13,14 138:4140:4,8 145:14147:21 152:25154:13 156:2,11156:15,16 157:17163:8 166:12172:7 175:2,4,5,7179:7,9 180:6181:23,25 182:2182:12 183:4

184:16 186:2,5190:19 195:25200:10 202:19

monitor 141:21142:9

month 166:9months 113:22

120:11 121:8123:15 125:21138:21 166:9170:3 177:11,12177:12,23 178:11193:10 194:6

morning 194:15,17mornings 194:14morocco 116:14,15

116:16 117:1119:16,18,20,23125:17 127:22150:21 154:12155:11 186:12187:7,11,25189:25 202:24

morses 110:4mosle 109:5mother 205:5motion 198:12,17

198:20,24 199:1motivation 197:7

197:11 204:13206:7,11

move 145:9 180:24182:6

moved 129:13moving 124:21mullin 110:7multimillions 182:5multiple 158:14murray 111:19

Nname 128:10

161:21 180:13181:20 186:11213:15

narrative 134:25159:2

national 133:25nature 134:8 147:7

171:16near 203:15necessary 213:12need 113:10 117:12

122:14 126:2146:2,11,13,14,15148:13 161:14163:7 169:9 170:6

172:7 177:6181:22 184:13186:13 196:23

needed 129:7 136:3157:13 162:10180:15 183:5198:20

needs 115:12129:13 135:5159:3

negotiate 169:23never 115:5 127:18

127:19,25 128:2,6140:9,15 142:14143:10 147:3154:1 156:22159:4 161:5,6162:15 167:14171:23 172:19,20177:2 191:3194:21,21 196:2203:14

new 109:6,24,24123:9,11 131:14132:20 133:4167:22,24 168:5169:23

newspaper 146:23night 194:16 204:18ninth 108:17noble 192:6nonexistent 146:4

146:22nonsense 171:21nordlicht 111:20normal 144:11

154:9normally 159:4

162:17norman 186:15normans 186:11

187:4north 110:16northeast 107:19notary 211:15

212:5,20 213:19notations 209:10notes 139:15 212:8notice 178:10

213:10noticed 177:14noticing 133:17number 122:15

190:21numbing 192:14nurik 108:2,3

134:22 151:22

193:8 199:18200:25 201:4,10201:19 213:4

ny 109:6nystrom 110:23

Ooath 206:1,14object 142:16

173:13 207:3objection 114:1,4

114:11,20 115:18115:24 116:22117:7,25 118:6,17120:14 121:10,17122:19 124:6,13133:8 135:15146:9 147:1,22148:20 149:5154:16,23 164:20165:2 167:2,16171:19 174:18176:8,15 178:4,14178:24 180:8187:1 188:10193:17 200:25207:2,6

observation 140:25observations

175:13observed 175:12obviously 161:5occasion 195:1occur 179:12occurred 137:3

138:1,2 143:8154:15 179:13180:12 181:17,18

occurring 153:20176:7

october 116:6,13117:17 125:17150:21 179:18189:7,8

offered 147:9office 108:2 127:10

129:23,24 135:13136:1 137:21,21139:25 140:2141:11,12,13142:5,6,10,12158:2,9,13,14159:15,17,20,21159:24 160:7168:19 175:15,17175:25 179:14185:22 208:4

Page 117: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 223

210:21offices 110:8 142:1official 211:9offshore 181:24

182:5,20,22 183:4oh 149:11 152:1

155:17 204:17okay 113:12,21

115:21 116:4,18117:4 120:6,24121:2 124:9,20129:20 132:2134:23 150:11152:1 164:8,10168:1,2 169:11170:12 171:4173:17 177:3184:15 195:10,24196:4 197:10203:3 207:20

olas 108:6 109:18110:19 136:9

old 131:14 132:14132:20 133:4

omissions 205:13once 119:1 122:16

122:16 170:14189:9

online 145:25open 193:6operation 136:16

137:2 152:10153:16 167:14170:4 195:4

opportunity 137:10137:16 138:6182:6 189:9196:10

opposed 122:23129:14 130:12144:3 147:18153:5 154:4161:17 172:15190:15 200:24201:8 203:5 204:8

order 140:7 199:20ordering 213:14original 210:20

213:13originally 142:17orsek 111:10ostrow 109:9outside 153:23oversaw 164:16oversight 166:21overwhelmed

193:16,18

Pp 107:4,18 108:8,17

109:2,18,20 110:2110:5,15 111:13111:16 117:17120:8 208:14

p6 123:13,24packet 157:22

168:14,17packets 115:6

135:14page 112:2,7 113:11

113:14,20 120:5122:9 169:14210:6

pages 212:7paid 113:21,24

114:14 196:13pain 203:24panthers 181:9,21paper 114:13 125:9

147:10 148:7,8papered 113:22

115:13 122:13123:15 133:24144:23

papers 202:24paperwork 124:15

126:16 134:1137:17 139:20144:2 166:11

paragraph 113:18122:12

parents 205:7paris 110:23park 109:6 110:23part 115:5 135:5

151:18 167:20171:6

partial 165:14particular 160:10particularly 125:9

156:1 193:10parties 146:12

210:21 212:12partner 195:16,22partners 109:1

191:14 192:16204:22

parts 152:4party 123:13

137:10,16 212:12paskert 110:15passport 161:1path 195:9paul 110:14pay 131:14 132:14

132:19 151:7183:5 196:17

paying 122:15179:7

payment 133:3196:15

payments 117:13151:21

pearson 107:8113:24 114:7,10114:15,18,24115:1 117:4 118:1121:8,25 123:16125:6,12,14,16126:8,19,25 127:5127:12,13,17128:1,2,21 129:2129:3,12 131:10132:4,6,13,18133:19,20 134:3135:3,12,13,17,22136:25 137:8,13137:24 138:3,15138:18 140:8141:4,14,20,25142:7 143:11,12143:13,15,17,24144:2,9,18 145:3145:18 147:14148:4 154:7 155:2156:24 163:13,20163:21 164:6,14164:19,25 166:14166:15,17,18167:12,12,19168:9,17 170:10172:10 173:4174:9,10 176:24180:2 182:24183:18 185:7,9,13185:16 186:7187:5,13,15,21188:20 190:6,9,15190:20 210:2213:8

pearsons 137:21138:5,13 141:11144:19 150:5151:9 154:4168:19 169:2189:2 190:19

penalty 210:22people 117:15

128:14 130:19133:15 135:7,8,19149:13 152:7,13152:16 153:18,22

153:24 154:1,21155:23 160:7,11162:17 163:9164:3,8 170:15171:5,22 173:21174:2,3,4,7,7184:7,13,20 192:8193:3,14 194:5195:5 199:21,23203:18,19,23204:4,5 205:18

peoples 182:11perceived 156:17percentage 168:16perfect 136:16,20period 180:11

193:25 194:22196:25 201:12

perjury 210:22person 128:16

156:15 162:1204:1,9 206:21207:16,17

personal 141:3,5personally 186:7

211:6perspective 193:11pertains 117:4

120:13philips 191:12

192:22phone 119:5phony 144:9 175:14

176:2physical 134:5pick 125:1picked 177:24

178:12pieces 186:23pl 110:12place 107:18 212:9plaintiff 107:6

114:23,25 115:10115:11 126:22,25127:2,4 134:2,15142:10 145:5,5,10145:11 146:4,22148:10,11 157:14159:12,13,14161:1

plaintiffs 127:17,19127:20,24,24128:1,3,4,15,21128:23 129:15,19130:7,12 135:4,4139:12,16,21142:14,15,23

143:7 144:14,25146:2 147:19158:6 162:4 170:8170:11 172:18,24174:21,25 175:1

plane 154:12,19156:7 203:13

planet 147:12planned 188:3platinum 109:1

123:11,13play 181:25player 138:12,13,14

138:15players 181:20playing 153:8plaza 109:23 111:14

111:17please 123:23,24

137:12 145:4203:9 210:20213:10

plenty 148:16159:21

plug 136:20plugged 156:2plugin 136:16pocket 174:14podhurst 111:10point 129:5,5 130:3

146:1 150:21152:5 153:10154:14 156:16158:5 160:16,22161:23 162:12163:12 166:1,4171:20 173:4,15184:5

police 205:11politicians 192:13ponce 108:17ponzi 122:23

125:12 126:1129:14 131:13132:10,12,21,22132:24 133:5149:9 166:19171:5 176:20179:3 181:7183:24 184:3186:3 191:2,9192:20 204:15,18

ponzispeak 170:14172:4

pool 132:18poor 119:6popped 180:13

Page 118: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 224

portion 120:18,25121:6 167:5176:19

position 141:21142:8

positions 123:2possible 131:6,8

137:1,15 138:5155:5 159:18177:21 178:3,6,7178:9,16,18202:20

post 186:11,22poster 186:10posts 187:4,7pot 195:1,2,3,6potential 130:20

156:4 193:1potentially 153:24ppm 145:20 157:22

168:7,9precious 171:15predicament

173:12prefer 198:8presence 182:15present 119:17

182:14pressure 181:13

193:12pretty 169:14 173:6preve 111:9 135:19

153:3 156:20162:19 168:8170:17 171:24

previously 200:21principles 155:22prior 126:17 131:21

138:21 177:11191:9 198:20

prison 155:25197:15,18 206:14206:17

private 154:19158:18 159:16,22

privilege 187:2201:1

privileged 201:3privy 142:20probably 116:13

118:19 127:10129:25 148:14155:3 178:2188:12

problem 133:9164:2 179:22183:10,25 201:10

201:12problems 153:24

184:24proceed 180:23proceeding 200:11

206:10proceedings 197:12

202:4,12 205:25206:14

product 168:12184:14

profession 192:2,3192:6

professional 163:25professionals 200:6profit 117:22 118:4progress 118:15promise 148:22

202:18,22,23,25203:1,5

promised 131:15promises 184:20prosecution 198:15

200:16proven 206:16provide 161:4,6provided 152:13provider 196:10proximity 141:11pry 193:4,6pseudonym 186:22public 117:22 118:5

211:15 212:5,20213:19

publicized 202:23pull 173:18 175:15pullasmuchmone...

173:23purported 144:14

183:25purportedly 127:5

139:12 153:11purporting 126:24

127:3 130:10purpose 128:13

152:8,17 188:5203:21

purposes 124:1push 145:10put 115:4 117:12

176:5 186:3190:20

putting 183:24,25191:20

Qquarter 134:14

194:14,15question 117:9

128:22 148:21,25149:23 159:9,11160:18 161:4162:24 163:24164:15 165:12178:9 186:14201:4,23 207:7,8207:11

questioning 113:1130:5,13 138:5,8

questions 129:18154:13,24 163:7165:15,24 166:2195:23 207:22

quick 122:7quiet 156:10

Rr 108:15 113:24

114:6,14 115:1123:16 127:5209:1 210:1,1212:1

rabin 111:16,17radar 136:12raise 155:21ramon 111:11ran 125:12rasco 111:11raton 110:9rayman 108:15razorback 108:12reacted 138:5,7read 113:17,17

117:20 123:9,22126:11 131:23133:13 139:4150:9 155:8 169:8169:18 191:6198:3 199:1,2200:14 209:6210:22 213:13

reading 131:22170:13 191:2

ready 135:14169:12,13 195:17195:20

real 115:8,9,10,11124:5 127:18,19128:23 134:15142:18 147:12148:3 157:20,21162:1,18,19

realize 147:6realized 155:4

really 113:10 116:3122:20 133:1,9148:24 151:18155:19,20 157:13165:5 170:25175:5 178:22184:18 191:19192:5,9

reason 128:7 143:7192:9 210:6

reasonably 159:18173:1

reasons 157:3recall 119:13

122:20 131:1133:14 136:24137:23 139:1150:11 152:20165:4 166:10168:11 179:25180:7,25 182:17182:23 183:1,8,22186:9 188:6,7,20196:11,16,25197:5,8,8,10,12197:14

receive 196:1received 151:21

179:20recollection 119:3

119:16,19 120:19139:7 157:9183:14 185:4187:8 188:22,24189:1,14 190:22196:12

record 113:5 116:3117:20 123:9128:12 171:3,5

records 119:5127:11

redacted 134:3redoing 134:8,11reduce 122:15

148:8reduction 197:21

197:24 199:10,13references 189:16referred 183:13referring 163:20

189:5refinancing 136:9reflect 114:13 155:8refresh 120:19regard 140:11regarding 122:10

123:9 181:6,6

regardless 171:4204:11

relate 116:21related 156:6 184:1relationship 117:5

174:11relationships

191:11relative 212:12reliable 167:22

168:5 169:23relied 163:21

164:18remember 120:15

128:16 139:3141:15 166:6173:18 182:24184:10 188:13191:2

repeat 201:5rephrase 186:13reply 152:9report 212:7reported 183:10reporter 208:2

212:16 213:19reporters 207:24reporting 107:23

213:1,17representation

185:1reproduction

212:15request 117:18requires 148:18rescued 155:20research 200:19,23

201:3,8,12,14,15201:16,20,24

resources 200:19200:19

respect 200:3respects 197:17responded 152:12

153:12responding 153:4

160:17response 150:19

151:1,8 152:8180:17 183:7

restructure 122:21retainer 196:20return 213:15returned 155:22,24

186:12revealed 182:5revelation 130:11

Page 119: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 225

130:14reverse 140:7reviewing 114:22

115:2rich 117:21,24

118:3 122:13,16127:19 129:18144:23 150:19

richard 118:1123:19 125:6128:21 138:18143:10 145:18149:18,23 150:15151:1 153:4154:10 156:9,23159:21 163:13,21164:19 165:9,13167:11,12 169:20170:10 171:10,11175:4,7,14 176:23181:5 182:2 187:5187:13,15 188:20189:20 190:5210:2 213:8

richie 115:14right 119:18 121:5

125:10,14,18127:1,7 128:12,18130:3 131:11132:24 135:6,23137:6,7 138:25140:10 142:15,15149:6 150:16,22156:3 162:16168:3 181:12191:21,22 196:24199:15 207:4

righthand 125:8,13126:15 138:24139:1 145:13

ring 136:5risk 130:18 180:15river 136:9rl 107:8 154:6rli 109:21road 110:9robbins 109:16roberta 110:8,10rode 164:16roi 113:21 122:15

123:14,16 148:9,9roof 184:11room 158:11 192:7rosanne 110:18rosenfeldt 107:4rothstein 107:4,13

108:1 112:2 113:6

209:15 210:3213:6,9,22

rra 135:23 137:1140:14 141:2,6192:19

rras 127:10rule 197:25 198:11

199:10 200:11,14202:4 204:12,13205:25 206:9

run 132:13 149:18167:14

running 122:25130:18 138:23161:13,16 166:20167:5

Ss 108:2,3,18 109:16

110:21 208:4210:1 213:4

salvage 155:15samuel 111:16,17sat 172:23saw 121:3 134:18

168:14 177:10190:5 196:13

saying 114:25121:16 129:19130:17,21 144:23144:23 146:11147:18 148:1161:17 164:3,9170:17,22 171:3183:5 188:25

says 115:12 117:18121:7 122:12123:11 124:10126:17 129:20151:18 170:6189:6,8

scam 125:9 133:16162:6 187:15

scheme 117:22118:4 122:24125:21 126:1,3,4129:14 131:13132:10,12,24135:5 138:23146:25 149:9154:15 167:5176:20 179:3181:7 183:25184:3 186:3 191:2191:9 192:20204:15,18 205:14

scherer 108:13,15

207:3scherers 173:19schlesinger 111:13

111:15 176:8,15schmookler 109:24schnapp 109:20school 191:3scolding 130:14scope 192:11scott 107:13 108:1

109:24 110:5112:2 117:21124:24 126:7134:21 146:5154:11 159:4164:12 165:8,10169:12 170:22172:17,21 177:10197:2,5 207:12209:15 210:3213:6,22

scrambled 203:10scrambling 117:1

155:18scream 124:18screen 136:12screw 120:16

173:24 174:5screwing 174:2seal 211:9search 141:6searches 139:23

140:14 141:2second 113:9 122:8

125:3 135:21150:9 183:20190:17,23

secret 159:25 160:1194:4

section 113:13121:4 171:10186:23

see 113:8,15 115:15116:7 117:4,16,18119:7 120:8 124:2129:19 145:5147:3 149:21153:24 158:6,11159:16 161:6,25168:3,18 192:12192:22 196:23200:13 202:20203:8

seeing 124:15133:17,17 139:8142:3 146:12168:11

seeking 201:8seen 113:16 150:8

158:3 169:15172:23

seigal 110:24seize 182:4sell 184:14semi 162:18,19send 122:3 136:3

154:6 171:24sending 133:24

134:4 136:2153:19

sense 135:2 148:11178:7 196:19

sensitive 159:12sent 115:14 122:2

151:11 153:6,18189:21,22 190:1

sentence 123:18,22197:22 199:7,13199:15 202:13203:7

sentenced 198:21sentences 123:17sentencing 198:18

198:20senterfitt 109:14separate 198:4separately 201:20sequence 116:1seriously 191:24server 127:10set 159:17,22

189:10 212:9,10212:17

settle 180:15settlement 124:1

138:21 139:3168:13

sexual 123:25 124:3126:18

shape 152:22sheet 209:10 210:20shes 143:22ship 156:3shoes 167:23short 116:2 169:14

177:8 195:18198:9

shorthand 212:8shortly 142:5show 127:11,21showed 137:17,20

158:12 168:7189:4

showing 113:6

120:2,24 123:7shows 176:5side 147:21sign 158:12 173:2

213:12,13,15signals 120:16signature 210:24

213:11,15,20signed 144:14

145:16 171:13210:20

signing 142:13signs 133:17silverman 110:12similar 153:2,3

170:18,21 171:7singerman 108:6single 145:9 163:19

164:18,24 172:14sir 113:16 125:7

126:21 129:11136:17,19 137:23138:19,22 150:18157:10 175:20176:3 177:20180:3 184:4187:12,18 195:21200:4,7 201:25

sit 126:7 127:13,16128:19 158:11,15163:22 166:10192:21

sitting 142:1,2,7,21170:15

situation 180:1six 125:20 193:10

194:6sixth 110:6skin 184:17skolnick 109:19sleep 193:23 194:16sleeping 193:21small 138:10smart 184:22smoked 195:1smoker 195:2,3smoking 195:6snowed 170:18sold 114:5 177:11

177:23 178:12sole 199:6,9somebody 140:10

148:6sorry 141:4 159:1

168:1 171:11176:17 187:22191:23

Page 120: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 226

sort 166:20 178:19sought 161:6 184:8sound 189:12sounds 137:7source 123:20 137:2

138:4 145:21167:22 168:5169:24 181:23

sources 156:4south 108:14 109:3

110:2,12southeast 107:24

108:9 109:14110:6

southern 107:1southwest 109:10spaceship 142:9speak 119:1 142:24

143:2,3 171:5182:21

speaking 143:22182:23

specific 121:15176:19,19 182:2190:13

specifically 139:2158:7

speculating 172:10spend 191:19 208:5spent 159:21spinosa 111:12

176:4,12,18,21,24177:1 187:22,24188:5,14 189:16189:16 190:8

split 146:7spoke 171:12

182:17,18square 141:16,18st 110:14stab 157:6,7standing 148:18start 151:10 184:21

192:19started 162:18

166:7starting 123:23

191:9starts 169:22 196:7state 173:8 209:3

211:1,15 212:3,5212:20

statement 116:14119:15 130:11176:5 186:1206:24

statements 209:7

states 107:1 155:25179:8 180:14

stating 153:11stay 208:6steal 121:13 123:21

157:17stealing 118:8stearns 111:6stenotype 212:7step 203:13stepped 156:6stettin 107:5 108:5

200:3 210:2 213:8stettins 200:6stick 128:10stipulate 198:6stop 123:2,17 130:2

130:19 159:3stopped 162:17stories 188:25

193:16story 152:15 153:20street 107:19 108:9

110:6,16 111:6,10stressed 193:19strict 153:25 154:3strong 166:16structured 109:1stuck 147:4stupid 193:3suarez 108:11subject 117:18

210:22subponzi 117:5

125:12 131:11,21133:2 149:19163:21 166:14

substance 210:23substantial 139:5

166:12 179:6198:14 199:10200:15

successful 195:4sudden 153:25

154:2 163:1suddenly 128:9

142:10suggested 144:21suggestion 144:19suite 108:2,6,9,20

109:3,10,18 110:2110:9,16 111:6,10111:14,18

suppose 178:18supposed 164:3sure 125:4 128:11

130:4 132:11

149:8 150:10,14155:16 158:19166:17 173:10184:17 190:24192:17 199:3202:19 205:22207:14 208:4

susan 109:4suspect 155:2

178:16swamp 123:1switch 124:21switching 136:25sworn 211:7 212:6szafranski 128:17

152:25 153:1,2162:17 170:16

szanfranksi 111:1

Tt 109:17 209:1,1

210:1,1 212:1,1tainted 173:11take 113:13 115:22

116:5 120:18122:7,22 123:1129:12 134:17145:8 151:7 157:6157:7 160:4 169:5177:6 179:11192:15 193:25194:15,19 195:15197:20 206:19213:10

taken 107:16,17,22126:24 156:16177:8 195:18210:4 212:9

takes 191:15talk 125:23 129:20

158:7 173:8 177:4180:18

talked 126:22 135:7147:25 180:21188:13 190:10,12

talking 126:12127:23 128:8129:6,17 139:3142:2 169:19184:16 185:12186:5 190:13202:22 203:16,17

tampa 110:16,16tanen 109:2taxes 179:7 183:5td 175:14team 164:17

tell 113:25 115:17116:20 119:20123:18 124:2,16126:11 133:24138:4,7 139:9140:16,17 141:8,8145:8 149:23151:1 152:17,19153:13,19 160:9160:10 175:12179:5,9 180:1,2,6180:9,11 185:6189:13 193:7196:23 200:13205:13

telling 117:14127:23 129:9,10130:1,2,15 133:19141:6 142:18152:16,20 156:9171:16 181:12,23184:7,13,20 185:3185:24

tells 123:19 195:25196:15

tens 141:18term 131:20 149:12

184:7terms 122:13

131:13 146:6190:13,16

terri 107:23 211:14212:5,20 213:18

testified 139:14145:17 166:19168:8 176:17,18197:23 198:1200:21

testify 128:5,20,23168:15 206:5212:6

testifying 170:25testimony 133:11

139:4 174:4 181:1191:2,6 198:3200:9 201:7202:11 203:3,22206:7,17

thank 197:1 207:23208:2,3,9

thanks 117:21207:21

thats 124:10 128:22131:18 134:12,23137:11 138:11139:13,19 140:5140:24 144:14

146:11,23 150:15151:19 156:21162:13,16,17,21168:2,3 169:1177:23 178:23181:14 183:13185:15,23 189:4,7189:7 191:5,19192:3 194:12196:3 199:5 201:4201:17 202:21

theres 115:9 127:19128:20 147:23,24148:16 153:23159:23 169:17,24170:11 171:9172:17 177:22185:2 189:3,20192:6 207:1

theresa 108:11theyre 115:19 142:2

142:3 148:19185:12

thing 129:14 130:1130:2,18 133:20141:24 145:20153:22 167:8172:14 174:11178:21 181:13183:11 184:19185:13 190:2

things 133:17,18,19143:16 145:22146:3 160:20175:2 184:13,20185:11 191:11192:10,14 193:3198:19 203:16

think 133:23 148:1150:2,25 151:19152:19 153:21154:8 156:5158:23 161:20167:24 169:8172:6 178:2186:13 191:10193:22 194:21203:25 204:1206:3 208:11

thinking 118:18147:18 178:1203:5

third 107:24 109:14117:16 137:10,16

thirty 213:13thought 131:6

146:17 147:19

Page 121: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 227

155:20 160:23161:3 162:10177:23 189:18196:9

thousands 141:18threads 193:16three 120:11 121:8

141:22 142:12158:17

throckmorton108:17

thrown 155:16,17tied 184:3time 107:18 116:2

118:12,25 119:15119:18,20 123:1,1129:11,18,18,21131:20,25 136:7136:21 138:16141:24 145:9,23152:5 153:11154:12,14 155:8155:12 156:16159:21 160:16,22161:23 162:16166:1,4,6,7 167:6168:18 171:15,20173:4,15,24 174:9178:13 179:13,17180:11,21 181:2,3181:22 182:10,14184:5,6 185:25186:18,20 190:5191:7,19 194:1,22196:14,25 197:2198:21 199:24,25212:9 213:11

times 135:2 181:4197:23

today 126:7 127:13127:16 128:19135:5 163:22170:15 187:14199:6

told 122:2 127:18130:16 134:17138:12 140:10,19140:21 142:13,17142:18,20,24,24143:6 144:10145:12,18 147:8149:1 158:6164:25 167:12,20167:20 172:19179:4,6 180:13,18184:8,10,16,18185:9,16,24

188:18 206:21top 115:12 116:7

120:18 121:6150:12,17,19

topics 180:24186:23

total 175:10 190:18190:21

totally 135:22 167:4touted 177:11,22

178:10towel 155:16,17tower 109:3track 193:15traffic 114:22 115:2

115:3 119:14,22129:22,23 130:6131:1 135:10139:8 141:22143:14 144:22147:23 152:22154:9 155:13157:5,8 165:4177:17 183:12185:3 189:3 190:3196:6,24

transaction 207:17transcript 198:4

207:23 210:5212:14

transcription 212:7transcripts 170:13

198:5transferred 129:7transported 160:7transporter 160:6traurig 109:18traveling 188:18

189:18,19tremendous 181:13

191:25trench 109:2,4tried 129:25 135:8

160:9 172:2200:13 201:17204:7

tripp 110:5tropin 108:17,18trouble 138:11

191:3true 137:11 139:13

140:24 151:19,21152:2,3,4 203:4209:8 210:22212:7

truly 192:6 213:16trusted 149:15,18

trustee 107:5,16108:4 202:3

trustees 112:7113:2 116:10119:24 120:21122:4 123:4

truth 212:6truthful 197:11,16

197:19,21 202:9202:11 203:5

truthfulness 197:7203:4

try 155:18 169:19170:6 182:6

trying 116:21117:11 122:21128:18 156:18173:18 181:7182:1,2 194:4207:9

tucker 110:20tuesday 150:24

187:22turn 137:20 203:14turned 139:20

202:24tv 203:2twice 122:16two 109:3 123:17

123:18 132:3152:20 159:1166:9 177:7,12,22178:11 192:1196:13,21 198:2198:19 206:21207:24,25 208:9

type 124:17typical 150:12

Uu 208:4ubs 179:7,22 180:14

181:13,24 183:3183:25

uhoh 151:9ultimate 132:8ultimately 128:14

149:17 168:11192:12

umbrella 190:21undersigned 211:5understand 114:3

117:9 126:23133:21 148:15,17149:3,4 164:13174:5 178:19198:11 199:9

207:7,8,9,11,13understanding

116:20 121:23174:19 190:18198:16 199:5202:10 203:4205:16,23

understood 126:6128:18 176:23192:24 195:15206:2

undertaken 200:23underway 192:20unfortunately

133:13 173:14192:5,8

united 107:1,23155:25 179:8180:14 213:1,17

unredacted 146:13unrelated 135:23unsecured 109:13upward 199:14urgency 135:3use 123:24 126:17

149:12 152:14156:5 175:10182:11 186:20194:13

utilizing 153:19

Vv 210:2 213:8vague 188:22

196:12value 109:1van 108:11various 191:11vehicle 199:6,9veil 127:25vein 153:5,13verbalized 203:1verify 207:18version 115:14

168:8view 155:7 158:1views 171:1visit 189:10vliet 108:11vodka 194:12volume 107:14von 163:4,8vs 107:7

Ww 107:13 112:2

209:15 210:3

213:6,22waiting 158:11waive 213:11,14,20walked 125:20

189:15walker 110:7walking 188:20want 116:3 120:5

125:1 127:24128:9 130:2 138:9146:7 148:6,24149:2 160:4161:25 163:12164:7 165:11170:25 171:2177:25 184:3187:6 193:6 195:7195:8,9 197:1,18202:20 204:5

wanted 114:13,14118:20 138:8144:18 145:14180:4 181:8 183:2184:11,17

wanting 129:19206:11

wants 122:13144:23 146:21

wasnt 135:18142:20 145:12151:6 156:14173:12 175:3,8,11177:18 186:5189:2 194:16195:2

waste 171:15way 118:13 119:4

122:21 126:5,14126:14 128:20131:4,5 133:15,23134:7 135:9 138:4140:9,9,23 141:10141:10 147:9,13147:13 152:12,23155:7,19,20158:10 159:18,20159:23 163:3,17163:23 164:21165:4 172:8173:15 175:23176:9 177:16,16180:20,25 181:11183:8 186:21187:8,16 188:16189:2,14,20 190:2192:16 200:14207:12

Page 122: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 228

weak 162:24weaver 111:6website 175:15

176:2websites 161:24wednesday 189:8week 170:7weekend 171:13

173:2weekends 195:2weeks 115:3 198:2

207:25 208:9weiselberg 109:9welcome 126:1welcoming 168:4wellrespected 136:2went 115:13 121:24

141:2 160:3162:16 163:1184:11 191:3

werblowsky 111:21west 111:6,10 136:3weve 173:4 189:10

190:10whats 113:6 120:2

123:7 141:11149:18 151:8190:25 202:17

whereof 212:17whistle 123:25

124:3 126:18whos 126:15 173:20widely 202:23wife 203:1 205:1william 108:15willing 145:5wing 166:19wire 143:18,20

146:15 196:1wish 198:7 213:14withdrawal 194:20witness 107:22

114:5,12,21115:19 116:25118:1,7,18 120:15121:11,18 122:20124:7,14 133:9134:23 135:16142:17 146:10,19147:2,23 149:6150:3 159:6164:21 165:3167:3,17 171:20173:14 174:19176:9 178:5,15211:6,9 212:6,17

witnessed 158:16

witnesses 206:22witnessing 129:10wont 186:17 203:20

203:21word 133:13 156:5

199:11words 128:16 202:9

206:19work 125:9 133:6

135:25 147:13159:4

worked 118:13191:12 207:24

working 142:2174:14

works 147:12worry 122:8wouldnt 140:13

141:2,4,20 142:15153:14 154:18159:14 162:3,10

wright 107:23211:14 212:5,20213:18

write 117:17 124:2172:8 210:5

writing 117:14153:25 154:1,2

wrong 172:22,25wrote 118:11,14

119:6,9,13 120:7151:13 153:1,2,10172:6

Xxanax 194:2,13,13

194:14,22,24

Yya 117:21yeah 117:10 150:25

185:2year 198:17,21years 132:3 149:10

192:1 194:18yell 130:17 184:7yesterday 189:7,9york 109:6,24,24

167:25youd 143:13 144:1

144:4 154:8 195:5youll 117:4,16

147:3 149:21153:24 169:9

youre 121:15127:22,22 130:5130:18,20 131:9

131:18 133:1,10133:22 136:7,21140:23 145:20,21147:17,18 149:22150:21 151:6,15154:20 156:9160:17 164:3,9,15165:6 166:13,24168:3 169:12170:17 172:10,22172:24 174:2175:10 177:4178:20 183:24193:23 197:16,21199:14,24 202:22204:3 206:16,23207:9,18

youve 151:2 154:12172:15 176:12193:14 199:1200:2,5,23 201:7203:22

Zzone 118:13zurich 109:21,22

0000 114:7,10,13,18

115:1,22 121:21121:24 123:20134:20 148:5196:14

01 117:17 120:802 118:1202210 110:2409 112:8,10,11,12

112:13,14,15125:16 136:21137:5 138:24139:10 166:25173:6,9 196:7

0934791rbr 107:2

11 108:2 123:15

169:2010 107:18 112:8,9

112:14 113:2,7115:22 139:5170:7 191:18195:15 200:9202:11 203:23

100 108:9 110:16114:7,10,18 115:1154:6 173:19

1000 108:6

10005 109:24101 109:6101780061 109:611 107:2,5,16 108:4

112:9,9 116:6,10121:7 184:9 185:9186:1,6

110 110:6,9 196:14113 107:20 112:3,8116 112:9119 112:1012 107:18 112:10

119:24 120:2121:3 208:14

120 112:111200 109:101218 107:24 213:1122 112:121221 111:2123 112:13124 112:4125 120:1113 112:11 113:14,20

120:21,24 121:614 112:8,12,15

113:8 122:4,81430 110:214th 172:2515 112:13,13 118:12

123:4,7,8 125:1126:6,7 128:19141:13 150:3

150 111:6 112:1415th 110:6,2316 112:14 141:13,13

150:2,4,5 189:7169 112:1517 112:15 169:2,617th 110:1218 120:419 112:10 120:3,7197 112:4,419th 111:21st 109:10

2200 109:10 123:20

148:5 154:62000 109:182004 197:52009 113:8 116:6

117:17 120:3,24169:21

200k 123:16201 110:122010 110:162011 107:17 209:12

210:4 211:10212:17 213:10

2014 211:16 212:21204 110:222 112:11 120:24

141:132200 111:623 107:17 112:12

122:9 210:4212:17 213:10

24 130:23,24 131:3131:7

2499 110:925 111:10250 120:10,12

121:11,192525 108:1725th 109:1427th 150:24,2528 112:1428th 150:21 189:829 112:9 116:6

117:1729th 116:132e 211:92nd 108:9

33 117:17 120:8

168:830 107:18 211:16

212:21 213:13300 121:7,12,2033128 107:20331301545 111:7331301720 111:1133131 108:9 109:4

111:3,14,18331311704 109:15331314 110:1333134 108:18331463127 110:333301 108:3,7

109:19 110:6213:5

333012073 109:10333012296 110:2033302 108:1433316 107:24 213:233394 108:2133431 110:9336025145 110:1635 197:25 198:11

199:10 200:11,15202:4 204:12,13205:25 206:9

350 108:6

Page 123: 2011-12-23 Rothstein Scott PM

(954) 525- 2221United Reporting, Inc.

Page 229

3700 109:3375 120:10 121:7,19

121:2039th 109:233rd 213:1

440 171:12400 114:13400k 113:21 123:16401 109:184400 108:945 107:18 208:14

55 112:850 121:21,24500 108:20515 110:195252221 107:25

213:2

66 112:10,11,12

136:9600k 123:14606 111:18633 108:146th 110:19

7700 108:2,20 111:14

213:4700k 122:14,16799 111:14,17

88 112:15800 111:10 114:13

145:9800k 113:21 123:1485 197:16

99 112:13900 114:13 134:19

145:9900k 113:22 115:14910 134:20910k 115:13,14954 107:25 213:2963327 211:15

212:2199 107:19