2011 12 science initiative

26
Rationale and Implementation Plan for Providing Two Science Program Options SCUCISD Secondary Science Coordinator

Upload: michaeltmary

Post on 25-Jun-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2011 12 science initiative

Rationale and Implementation Plan for Providing Two Science

Program OptionsSCUCISD Secondary Science

Coordinator

Page 2: 2011 12 science initiative

The Biology-Chemistry-Physics Sequence

• Recommendation from the Committee of 10 in 1893

• Science not a “core subject” (3 R’s). Typically only one year required.

• U.S. Largely aggregate at the time • Biology was zoology and botany and only

trained students to observe and describe characteristics of plants and animals

• Biology didn’t require lab equipment

Page 3: 2011 12 science initiative

117 years later…

• Biology is no longer based on physical characteristics

• Since the discovery of DNA in the 1950s, biology has become increasingly chemistry-based.

• Technology and advances in equipment have introduced more complex topics into biology such as cell structures, enzymes and reactions

• Biology has become more abstract and depends on key concepts from physics and chemistry.

Page 4: 2011 12 science initiative

The Physics-Chemistry-Biology Sequence

• Gaining popularity since the 80s, mainly in private and magnet schools. More public schools began using model in 90s & 00s.

• Supported by groups such as the NSTA and AAPT

• Strongly supported by BSCS Cornerstone to Capstone Approach (BSCS developed the 5E model of instruction)

Page 5: 2011 12 science initiative

Advantages of Bio-Chem-Phys Sequence

• Historical- generations of students have followed this model

• No changes needed to personnel, curriculum, etc.

Page 6: 2011 12 science initiative

Advantages of Phys-Chem-Bio Sequence

• Physics deals with concepts students can experience (more concrete)

• Physics teaches HOW science works and empowers predictions

• Allows for inquiry based teaching• Less safety risks• Help students understand science as a

coherent body of knowledge and understanding by learning science from the concrete to the abstract

Page 7: 2011 12 science initiative

Problems Identified with Bio-Chem-Phys Sequence

• Has produced marginal results in the district, the state, and the nation

• Asks students to learn abstract concepts before understanding the underlying concrete concepts

• Does not allow for vertical alignment between the courses.

Page 8: 2011 12 science initiative

Where are we?SCIENCE GR. 8 GR. 10 GR. 11 District

All Students 83 83 96 88

African American 77 74 96 85

Hispanic 78 77 92 84

White 87 88 98 92

Economically Disadvantaged 69 72 90 79

*Limited English Proficient 29 38 86 61

*Special Education 44 46 65 59

Source: Texas Education Agency Accountability Report July 2010

Page 9: 2011 12 science initiative

Where are we?SCIENCE % Commended 2008 2009

All Students 27 32

African American 17 22

Hispanic 21 23

White 33 40

Economically Disadvantaged 18 21

*Limited English Proficient 8 5

*Special Education 11 14

Source: Texas Education Agency 08-09 AEIS Report Nov 2009

Page 10: 2011 12 science initiative

TAKS/STAAR Transition

% Met Standard- Science TAKS (2002-2010)

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

SCUCISD State

SCUC

State

Bio 31 31

Chem

22 23

Phys 31 28

Avg EOC Raw Score 2010

Source: T.E.A. 2003 -2010 Accountability Reports and E.O.C. distribution Report 2010

Page 11: 2011 12 science initiative

Problems Identified with the Phys-Chem-Bio Sequence

• Lack of math sophistication of ninth graders– Changes in the physics TEKS

1998 TEKS 2010 TEKSSuggested prerequisites: one unit of high school science, Algebra I, and completion of or concurrent enrollment in a second year of mathematics. This course is recommended for students in Grades 10, 11, or 12.

Suggested prerequisite: Algebra I or concurrent enrollment in Algebra I. This course is recommended for students in grades 9, 10, 11, or 12.

Page 12: 2011 12 science initiative

Problems Identified with the Phys-Chem-Bio Sequence

• Impact of State Assessments

– New test blueprints will emphasize the assessment of the curriculum standards that best prepare students for the next grade or course including CCRS.

– Performance standards will be set based on data from empirical studies of other state, national, and international assessments as well as on the examination of test content.

Page 13: 2011 12 science initiative

Problems Identified with the Phys-Chem-Bio Sequence

• Availability of Highly Qualified Physics Teachers

– SCUC has pool of teachers that could easily be successful teaching a ninth grade physics course.

– Professional Development Opportunities

Page 14: 2011 12 science initiative

Problems Identified with the Phys-Chem-Bio Sequence

• Lack of Appropriate Curriculum Resources

– CSCOPE– 5E Unit Maps– Other resources

Page 15: 2011 12 science initiative

Problems Identified with the Phys-Chem-Bio Sequence

• Reluctance of teachers to embrace approach

– Provide necessary and appropriate training and education to science faculty.

– Science Coordinator is trained to provide these services, as is another science teacher in the district

Page 16: 2011 12 science initiative

Research Identified Benefits of Phys-Chem-Bio Sequence

• Increased coherence across science courses

• Increased enrollment in advanced science courses (especially for minority populations and girls)

• Increased science and math achievement (state, national, and international tests)

• More positive attitude toward science

Page 17: 2011 12 science initiative

Models of Implementation (as proposed by BSCS)

•Option One: Sweeping Change

•Option Two: Permanent Two- Program Model

•Option Three: Phased in Model

Page 18: 2011 12 science initiative

Models of Implementation

•Permanent 2 Program model–SCUCISD–Offer of “choice” or “options” fits the district “customer service” initiative

–Less strain on all parties

Page 19: 2011 12 science initiative

Likely Challenges, Objections or Concerns (Based on Role)

• Parent– “Not the way I learned.”

– “Physics is hard and has too much math!!”

– “Physics has to be difficult to be real.”

– “Want my kid to be successful.”

Page 20: 2011 12 science initiative

Likely Challenges, Objections or Concerns (Based on Role)

• Teacher

– “Novel Approach”

– Wants only the best students

– Physics isn’t for everyone

Page 21: 2011 12 science initiative

Likely Challenges, Objections or Concerns (Based on Role)

• Administration and Counselors

– I’m backing my teacher since I don’t know anything about physics.

– How will this affect my scores?

Page 22: 2011 12 science initiative

Implementation Plan

• EDUCATE– Administrators and Counselors

– Teachers

– Students

– Parents

Page 23: 2011 12 science initiative

Implementation Plan

• SELECT or IDENTIFY

– Teachers

– Students• Choice• Survey, Teacher Recommendation• Data

Page 24: 2011 12 science initiative

Implementation Plan

• DESIGN and ASSESS

– Curriculum• Resources, Pacing Calendar, Unit Maps, Labs• Determining success of curriculum;

troubleshooting

– Instruction• Strategies (inquiry, modeling), Resources• Determining success of instruction;

troubleshooting

Page 25: 2011 12 science initiative

Implementation Plan

• Long Term

– What, when, and why of data collection– Chemistry elements for year 2 of plan– Biology elements for year 3 of plan– Integration with math (9th Phys-Alg I; 9th

PreAP Phys-Geometry)– Complete change over?

Page 26: 2011 12 science initiative

Resources• BSCS Cornerstone-to-Capstone Conclusion

http://www.bscs.org/library/CapstoneConclusion.pdf

• BSCS Executive Summaryhttp://www.bscs.org/library/Capstone_Exec_Summary.pdf

• http://www.physicsfirstmo.org/index.html• http://www.aapt.org/Policy/physicsfirst.cfm• T.E.A. TEKS and STAAR http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/ http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index2.aspx?id=6148• AAPT Guide to Physics First

www.aapt.org/aboutaapt/ennouncer/upload/physicsfirst.pdf