2012 academic achievement report
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Annual District Progress Report 2012
October 2012
Goal #1: To continually improve student growth and achievement
20 Year Historical Enrollment Data
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
182718601904187618731940201120892206227023652451
26082753
29203028
32703412
35823701
4080
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
86.7 86.6 85.4 84.181.8 81.2
78.5 76.9 76.474.2 74.1
4.6 52.8 2.2
5.8
14.5
White Black Hispanic Asian
Ethnicity Trend Data
Percent Free and Reduced Lunch
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
5.1
5.85.3
6
5.25.6
5.3 5.4
8.18.7
Percent of IEP Students
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20125
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
12 12.3
10.710
10.7
11.9
10.8
11.9 12 1211.5
Number of ELL Students
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
31
179
47
123103
88
154173
Trend Performance for All State Tests/All Grades/All Subjects
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
82 83 84 87 90 91 92 92 93 93 92.2
2012 District Assessment Results
• ISAT: Criterion Referenced Exam based upon Illinois
Learning Standards and indicators
• PSAE: Combined Work Keys and ACT Scores
• ACT: American College Testing
• AP Data: Advanced Placement
2012 ISAT Reading Performance
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th Grade
7th Grade
8th Grade
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 93 97 92 95 95 97
Reading Trends for All Students
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 96 94 9696 939695
98 9695 95 949397
92
20082009201020112012
Reading Trend Performance
6th grade 7th grade 8th grade0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10092 91
9793 91
9695 96 9696 959995 95 97
20082009201020112012
2012 ISAT Math Performance
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 96 98 95 96 95 98
Math Trend Performance
3rd grade 4th grade 5th grade0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 99 98 9597 98 9699 999496 98 9596 98 95
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Math Trend Performance
6th grade 7th grade 8th grade0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 96 94 9696 93 969598 9697 98 9796 95 98
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Science Trend Data
4th grade 7th grade0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 97
87
96 9498 9797 9796 96
20082009201020112012
2008 2009 2010 2011 201221
21.5
22
22.5
23
23.5
24
24.5
25
24.2 24.1 24
24.424.6
Composite
Class of 2012 ACT Performance
Students Meeting College Readiness Benchmarks
English Reading Math Science0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10090
75 74
5765
47 44
30
DunlapState
(24)(22)(18) (21)
ACT Trend Scores (2008/2012)
English Reading Math Science Composite21
21.5
22
22.5
23
23.5
24
24.5
25
23.9
24.224.5
23.5
24.224.5
24.8 24.6
24
24.6
20082012
2012 PSAE Performance
Reading Math Science0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
75 7880
PSAE Trend Performance
Reading Math Science0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
200720082009201020112012
7673 75 78 7580
Advanced Placement Trend Scores
AP Students AP Exams Scores of 3+0
50
100
150
200
250
108
176
74
147
237
126
2008 2012 Number of Students
No Child Left Behind (2001) requires:95% of all students in grades 3-8 and 11th grades be
assessed (District 99.5%)
Schools meet the 91% attendance rate for elementary and middle schools (District 95.7%)
High Schools meet the minimum of 82% graduation rate (District 88.6%)
All students meet the minimum AYP (85% )
All subgroups (45 students or more) meet AYP (85%)White, Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, Native
America, Multi-Racial/Ethnic, Limited English Proficient, Students with Disabilities, and Economically Disadvantaged
NCLB Adequate Yearly Progress
2012 District Performance
Reading Math0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100 92 9493 959297
7180
6774
82 87
All White AsianAfrican American IEP Low SES
AYP Minimum
How is the data used?• Continuous improvement!
• Data is reviewed by teachers/administrators to examine:▫ Student performance by school/grade level▫ Individual student performance▫ Curricular strengths/needs▫ Instructional strengths/needs
• The data is combined with other District assessments ▫ PLC teams identify students in need of additional support▫ Curriculum Council examines curricular/instructional gaps▫ Building Leadership Teams set instructional goals for the school
• Interventions are provided for students
• Curricular/Instructional changes are made as appropriate