2012 - progress

24
Spring 2012

Upload: hvcclibrary

Post on 13-Jul-2015

270 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: 2012 - Progress

Spring 2012

Page 2: 2012 - Progress

The Year in Review and What’s Ahead

Page 3: 2012 - Progress

Thanks to a concerted lobbying push by The HSUS and HSLF and its supporters…

Page 4: 2012 - Progress

As the first year of the 112th Congress draws to a close, let’s take stock of how animal

protection fared in 2011.

Page 5: 2012 - Progress
Page 6: 2012 - Progress

Deficit reduction was the theme this year. Nevertheless, thanks to a concerted lobbying push by The HSUS and HSLF and its

supporters, Congress approved some record-level boosts for key animal welfare programs in fiscal year 2012:

Page 7: 2012 - Progress

Almost a 20 percent jump (more than $5 million increase) in the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s annual budget to strengthen inspections

and enforcement of the Animal Welfare Act at about 12,000 sites, including puppy mills, laboratories, zoos, circuses, and other

facilities.

Page 8: 2012 - Progress

A nearly 40 percent jump ($196,000 increase) for USDA’s enforcement of the Horse Protection Act, which had been stuck at the inadequate ceiling of

$500,000 since 1976. These funds will help USDA crack down on the cruel and illegal practice of “soring” show horses, the intentional use of caustic chemicals

and sharp objects on horses’ hooves and legs to make it painful for them to step down and give them an artificial, high-stepping gait in show

competitions—in other words, deliberate infliction of severe pain in order to cheat and win prizes.

Page 9: 2012 - Progress

A 17 percent jump ($2.32 million increase) for USDA’s Investigative and Enforcement

Services, which does follow-up work on a range of cases including those under the

Animal Welfare Act and the Horse Protection

Page 10: 2012 - Progress

Maintaining $4.8 million (same as last year) for the veterinary student loan forgiveness program that helps ease the shortage of veterinarians practicing in

rural areas and in government positions (such as those overseeing humane slaughter and Animal Welfare Act rules), by forgiving student debt for those

who choose to practice in one of those underserved areas.

Page 11: 2012 - Progress

At least $20 million to help ensure implementation of labor and environmental provisions—including for wildlife protection programs—under free trade agreements with countries of

Central America, Peru, and the Dominican Republic.

Page 12: 2012 - Progress

Thanks to the work of the Center for Biological Diversity and others, $4 million to study and

combat white-nose syndrome, a lethal disease that has had a devastating impact on millions

of bats in North America.

Page 13: 2012 - Progress

In addition to funding animal welfare programs, the appropriations committees also included helpful

report language directing the federal agencies and expressing concern about a number of important

issues.

Page 14: 2012 - Progress

(Appropriations Committee Reports)

Humane Slaughter —directing USDA to ensure that funds intended to strengthen

oversight of humane handling rules are being used that way.

Page 15: 2012 - Progress

Animal Fighting —expressing strong concern and urging USDA to work with relevant

agencies to investigate and enforce laws against dogfighting and cockfighting.

Page 16: 2012 - Progress

Antibiotics in Animal Agriculture —urging the Food and Drug Administration to take several specific actions to move forward on

addressing the overuse of antibiotics in livestock for non-therapeutic purposes, a common practice on factory farms. Sen. Dianne

Feinstein, D-Calif., and Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., led efforts on this.

Page 17: 2012 - Progress

Pet Theft for Research—directing the National Institutes of Health to expedite its phase-out of Class B dealer-acquired dogs and cats in

research (such dealers obtain animals through random sources, which can include theft of family pets and fraudulent response to “free to good home” ads). Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, played the key role on

this.

Page 18: 2012 - Progress

Alternatives Development—requiring the NIH to prioritize funding for transition to computational, molecular and other non-animal tests for chemical risk assessment and

drug testing, and report to Congress on progress; also requiring the Environmental Protection Agency to move to computational toxicology and other non-animal testing for

the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program. Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif., and Sen. Harkin championed these efforts.

Page 19: 2012 - Progress

As part of the final funding bill for USDA, Congress agreed to prohibit agribusiness subsidy direct payments to millionaires (individuals or legal

entities with an average Adjusted Gross Income in excess of $1 million). Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., offered an amendment that was approved by an

overwhelming 84-15 vote.

Page 20: 2012 - Progress

An anti-wildlife rider (“extinction rider”) would have prevented the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from implementing some of

the most crucial sections of the Endangered Species Act, such as protecting any new species and designating critical habitat

for currently listed species.

Page 21: 2012 - Progress

The final funding bill for the Interior Department contained a provision barring the Bureau of Land Management from killing healthy, unadopted wild horses and burros or selling them for

slaughter, as in past years.

Page 22: 2012 - Progress

The Senate’s Defense Department authorization bill would have inadvertently eliminated a prohibition in the Uniform Code of Military

Justice against acts of bestiality by service members, as the Senate dealt with the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy. After we

contacted the key members of the House-Senate conference committee, the conferees restored the ban on bestiality.

Page 23: 2012 - Progress

The Army agreed to halt testing on monkeys of nerve agents meant to simulate a nerve gas

attack, as urged by Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md.

Page 24: 2012 - Progress

Assignment: (1) Review Class Site

(2) Read PowerPoint on Who is Responsible for Animals under New York Issues. This should be review to you from Animal Law I.

For Friday: Setbacks and Key Issues Ahead