2013 accountability ratings for nisd september 9, 2013
TRANSCRIPT
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD
September 9, 2013
Performance Index System
• Comprised of 4 Indexes• Each Index is scored from 0-100• No single rating as of 2013
– Each Index is a separate rating
Additional Information
• ELL/LEP– 2013 ELL students are excluded
completely if they have been in US schools three years or less.
• Retest Results– EOC retest and SSI 1st and 2nd
administration results are included in all index calculations.
2013 Northwest ISD Accountability Rating (Met
Standard in All 4 Index Standards)
Index
1: St
uden
t Ach
ievem
ent (T
arge
t=50
)
Index
2: St
uden
t Pro
gres
s (Ta
rget=21
)
Index
3: Clos
ing Pe
rform
ance
Gap
s (Ta
rget=55
)
Index
4: Po
stsec
onda
ry Rea
dines
s (Ta
rget=75
)0
20406080
100
NISD Scores
NISD Scores
Index 1
Student Achievement Student performance based on satisfactory student
achievement across all subjects for all students
Student Group: All Students onlyMinimum Size Criteria: None
Target: • 50 for campuses and districts; • NISD: 87
NISD Student Achievement Table: All NISD Students
NISD Student Performance
Reading Mathematics
Writing Science Social Studies
% at Phase-in 1 Level II or above
90% 87% 74% 92% 89%
# at Phase-in 1 Level II or above
10,361 9,971 3,997 5,427 4,260
Total number of Tests
11,542 11,440 5,389 5,874 4,781
Index 2
Student ProgressMeasure of actual student growth independent of overall achievement
levels for race/ethnicity student groups, student with disabilities served by special education, and English Language Learners
Subjects: Reading and Mathematics; Writing for available grades
Student Groups: 10 which include All students, ELL, Sped, Af. Am. , Am. Ind., Asian, Hispanic, Pac. Isl., White, Two or More Races
Minimum Size Criteria: • All Students > 10• Race/Ethnicity, ELL, Sped > 25
Index 2
Methodology: 1. For each student group, the % of students at the growth level on
the assessment is multiplied by the weight for that growth level – each subject• One point for each % of student at the Met growth level• Two points for each % of students at the Exceeded growth
level2. Combine all subjects and points for a final index score
Target: • High Schools > 17• Middle Schools > 29• Elementary Schools > 30 • District > 21 • NISD: 36
Index 3
Closing Performance GapsMethodology: Each subject contributes points from each student group:
• One point for each % of tests that meet Phase-In I Level II Performance and above
1. Combine all subjects and points for a final index score
Target: • Index Score of 55 for campuses and districts• NISD: 82
Index 4
Postsecondary ReadinessPurpose is to emphasize the
importance for students to receive a high school diploma that provides the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training
programs, or the military; and the role of the elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school.
Index 4
Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation rates from either the 4-Year or 5-Year Graduation rate
Methodology: 3 Step Process1. Determine the number of students who completed High School (graduated) in 4 years
(2012):• RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups
2. Determine the number of students who completed High School (graduated) in 5 years (2011):• RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups
3. Compare 4 & 5 year graduation rate. Determine which group size is greater.
4. If a campus does not have a four or five year graduation rate, the high school dropout rate is used instead.• RHSP/DAP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups
Target: • Index Score of 75 • NISD: 86
2013 Ratings Criteria
• Transition year – Ratings criteria and targets designed to apply to 2013 only.
• Rating Labels– Met Standard– Met Alternative Standard– Improvement Required (Did not meet 1 or more index targets)
– Not Rated– Not Rated: Data Integrity Issues
• Ratings Criteria – Campuses and districts must meet the Accountability Targets in all indexes for which they have performance data to receive a Met Standard.
• 24 schools met standard• 1 Improvement Required• Denton Creek is not rated – TJJD Facility
Steele Accelerated High School
0
30
60
90
NISD Scores
NISD Scores
SAHS = 87
SAHS=24
SAHS =83
SAHS=58
2013 Distinctions
Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are eligible for the following distinction designations in 2013.
• Top 25%: Student Progress• Academic Achievement: Reading/ELA• Academic Achievement: Mathematics
Distinctions
Top 25%: Student Progress– Based on performance on Index 2: Student Progress.
Campuses that are in the top quartile of their campus comparison group in performance on Index 2
– Campus Comparison Group: 40 campuses across the state that look demographically similar based on:• School Type: Elementary, Middle, High• Numbers of students enrolled• Percentage of English Language Learners• Percentage of economically disadvantaged students• Mobility Rate of studentsEach campus has a unique group of 40. No two campuses has an identical group.
NISD Schools with Top 25% Student Progress
• Hatfield Elementary School• Nance Elementary School• Hughes Elementary School
Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Reading/ELA
Schools needed to be in quartile 1 of their comparison campuses in 2 of the following:• Greater Than Expected Student Growth
in Reading/ELA• Grade 3 Reading Performance • Grade 4 Writing Performance • Grade 7 Writing Performance • Grade 8 Reading Performance • Overall Attendance Rate
NISD Schools with Reading/ELA Distinctions
• Medlin Middle School• Tidwell Middle School
Academic Achievement Distinction Designation Mathematics
Schools needed to be in quartile 1 of their comparison campuses in 2 of the following:• Greater Than Expected Student
Growth in Mathematics• Grade 5 Mathematics Performance • Algebra I by Grade 8 - Participation• Algebra I by Grade 8 - Performance • Overall Attendance Rate
NISD Schools with Mathematics Distinctions
• Chisholm Trail Middle School• Hatfield Elementary School