7/27/2019 2013 ICIRI oral presentation criteria.pdf

1/2

Criteria for Evaluating 2013 ICIRI Oral Presentations

Well done (5) Very Good (4) to Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)

Content The content is clear andconcise and deals with an

important issue in the field ofstudy and includes

goals/motivating questions.Information is accurate.

The content providespersuasive information and

is accurate.

The content is vague inconveying a point of

view and does not createa strong sense of

purpose

The content lacks a clearpoint of view

Organization Researcher presents

information in logical,

interesting sequence whichaudience can follow.

Researcher presents

information in logical

sequence which audiencecan follow.

Audience has difficulty

following presentation

because researcherjumps around.

Audience cannot

understand presentation

because there is nosequence of information.

Subject

Knowledge

Researcher demonstrates full

knowledge (more than

required) by answering allquestions with explanations

and elaboration.

Researcher is at ease with

expected answers to all

questions, but fails toelaborate.

Researcher is

uncomfortable with

information and is ableto answer only

rudimentary questions.

Researcher does not

have grasp of

information; researchercannot answer questions

about subject.Eye Contact Researcher maintains eye

contact with audience, seldomreturning to notes.

Researcher maintains eye

contact most of the time butfrequently returns to notes.

Researcher occasionally

uses eye contact, but stillreads most of report.

Researcher reads all of

report with no eyecontact.

Elocution Researcher uses a clear voiceand correct, precise

pronunciation of terms so thatall audience members can hear

presentation.

Researchers voice is clear.Researcher pronounces

most words correctly. Mostaudience members can hear

presentation.

Researchers voice islow. Researcher

incorrectly pronouncesterms. Audience

members have difficulty

hearing presentation.

Researcher mumbles,incorrectly pronounces

terms, and speaks tooquietly for researchers in

the back of class to hear.

Graphics/PowerPointpresentation

Researcher's graphics explainand reinforce screen text andpresentation. Graphics are

clear and easy to follow. Nomisspellings or grammatical

errors

Researchers

graphics relateto text and presentation andare readable.

Researcher occasionallyuses graphics that rarelysupport text and

presentation.

Researcher usessuperfluous graphics andgraphics are difficult to

read and understand.

7/27/2019 2013 ICIRI oral presentation criteria.pdf

2/2

Scoring for 2013 ICIRI Oral Presentations

Session Date: Venue/ Session Hall: Judge:See attached sheet for instructions; use more than one line for additional comments if necessary

Score each criteria from 1-5 reflecting Excellent (5), Very Good (4), Good (3), Fair (2), Poor (1)

Presenters

Name

Content Organization Subject

Knowledge

Eye Contact Elocution Graphics/

PowerPointPresentation

TOTAL Comments