2013 nasa cipair summer research internship program electrical engineering group marissa buell,...
TRANSCRIPT
1
2013 NASA CIPAIR SUMMER RESEARCH INTERNSHIP PROGRAMELECTRICAL ENGINEERING GROUP
M A R I S S A B U E L L , N E H A D D A B A B O , R E N E F I G U E R O A , P E T E R M O A L A
OPTIMIZING A WIRELESSLY POWERED AC-DC BOOSTER FOR BIOMEDICAL IMPLANTS
Supervised by SFSU Student Kang Bai and SFSU Advisor Dr. Hao Jiang
2
BIOMEDICAL IMPLANTS
• Cardiac pacemakers
and defibrillators
• Neurological
stimulators
• Muscle Stimulators
• Cochlear implants
• Monitoring devices
• Drug pumpshttp://www.dvclub.info/il-pacemaker-biologico-tutto-naturale/
3
BIOMEDICAL IMPLANTS
•Medical implant batteries require replacement every 5-10 years• Effective power storage requires a larger battery• Increased risk with multiple surgeries
4
BIOMEDICAL IMPLANTS
• Cost of surgery for replacement ranges from $2000-$45,000+
• Insurance companies do not always cover replacement costs• “She (Plaintiff Paige Riley) alleges that Blue Cross &
Blue Shield of Mississippi refused to cover an operation to replace the batteries of a stomach-pain device she had surgically implanted in 2005. As a result, Riley had to fork over the $43,364.27 in cash”
http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/23/hmo-medical-implants-business-health-care-batteries.html
5
THE WIRELESS SOLUTION
• Wireless power transfer for charging of Internal Medical Devices (IMDs) decreases the need for periodic, invasive surgery.
• Dramatically reduces battery size
• Currently, San Francisco State University has developed the most efficient AC-DC Booster• An open circuit input voltage of 200mV yields an output
voltage of 5V
6
CIPAIR PROGRAM GOAL
• Optimize, miniaturize, and redesign the circuit by
removing jumper wires and extrinsic components
• Minimize parasitic capacitance, inductance and
resistance
• LT SPICE software—used to simulate testing.
• Printed Circuit Board (PC Board)—used to perform testing experimentally. Simulation cannot account for parasitic aspects, so the usage of a PC Board is mandatory to attain realistic results.
7
TRANSFERRING WIRELESS POWER
• Time varying magnetic field induces an electric current in the receiver coil
Faraday’s Law
Self Induction
SETUP• Alternating current passing
through the transmitter coil induces an electromagnetic field.
Baker, et al., "Feedback analysis and design of RF power links for low-power bionic systems." Biomedical Circuits and Systems, IEEE Trans. on 1(1): 28-38.
8
AC-DC BOOST CONVERTEROPERATING PRINCIPLE
How does 200mV become 5V?
• Switch is thrown open, large voltage drop occurs across the
other circuit components.
• The coil experiences an abrupt, large decrease in current, generating a
large voltage
• With the switch open, the coil provides the load with the voltage
10
FULL WAVE RECTIFIER
• Transforms input AC voltage to output DC voltage required to charge the battery
• Uses two diodes and two MOSFET transistors to avoid the large turn on voltage
14
Signal Coil
Analog Signal Conditioning
Power Coil
AC-DC Boost Converter
Transmitter Coil
Receiver Coil composed of two
coils
DC Output
15
SIGNAL CONDITIONER
• Receives and cleans the the input frequency signal for use by the microcontroller, which converts the analog signal to the digital
17
Analog Signal Conditioning
Logic Control Circuit
Signal Coil
Power Coil
AC-DC Boost Converter
Transmitter Coil
DC Output
18
MICROCONTROLLER
• Small CPU that controls the switch’s on and off time• Uses input signal from the auxiliary coil to control
when switch opens and closes • The switch regulates the current passing through
through the circuit
19
CURRENT SETUP
• Uses a transmitter coil to wireless transfer power• Allows for high frequency input and an
adjustable waveform
Why do we want an adjustable waveform and high frequency input?
Higher frequency input allows for a higher duty cycle
20
THE SQUARE WAVE ADVANTAGE
Allows us to increase current input—greater duty cycle, less wasted current
• After full-wave rectification, square wave maintains nice steady output line.
• Sinusoidal wave requires some manipulation
21
DUTY CYCLE VS OUTPUT VOLTAGEFOR SINUSOIDAL WAVEFORM
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
1
2
3
4
5
6
DC Output (V) v.s. Duty Cycle(%)
DC Output (V)
duty cycle %
DC
Outp
ut
Volt
age (
V)
Peaks at 62%
22
Green Wave – Input AC Voltage Blue Wave – Control Signal
Square Wave78% Duty Cycle
Sinusoidal Wave62% Duty Cycle
Rising edge of control signal must be properly aligned with input AC to maximize current input
23
OUTPUT VOLTAGE VSOPEN CIRCUIT INPUT VOLTAGE
Sinusoidal WaveVout=10.9Vin
Square WaveVout=25Vin
Smaller input yields same output
26
RECREATING THE CURRENT SCHEMATIC
• Working backwards from the manufacturer’s file, the schematic for the presently utilized PC board was generated• Extra components, headers, and jumpers were
then removed Recreation of the layout
29
GENERATION OF THE LAYOUT
PLACE
• Organize the components
• Minimize parasitic aspects
COMPLETE WIRING
DESIGN RULE
CHECK (DRC)
• Ensure regulations are met
• Distance, drill hole size,
REVISE LAYOUT
SEND FORMANUFACTUR
E
33
WHAT’S NEXT?
• Manufacturing of the board takes 2 weeks
• Wind coils of different wire lengths and measure resulting inductance and resistance to minimize input voltage
• Run measurements on the old PC Board
• After receiving the new PC Board, solder components and rerun testing
34
PC BOARD MEASUREMENTS
Time On (µs)
Time Off (µs)
End of Period (µs)
Duty Cycle Output Voltage
-395.2 66.8 126.6 88.53967037
4.2449
1126.5 1592 1671.5 85.41284404
4.2611
498.1 893.3 967.1 84.26439232
4.2449
1125.9 1575.5 1665.4 83.33642261
4.2189
-424.4 2.3 122.6 78.00731261
4.013
518.56 894.04 1004.32 77.29743083
4.1612
704.51 1051.19 1160 76.11144043
5.1192
1707.5 2053 2164.1 75.66798073
5.1192
249.96 527.92 723.84 58.65619988
5.02
482.8 715.7 995 45.47051933
4.7
1003 1191.12 1522.6 36.2047729 4.1381
Data for 1.43 mH coil
35
DUTY CYCLE VS. OUTPUT VOLTAGE
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
1
2
3
4
5
6
Duty Cycle (%)
Outp
ut
Volt
age (
V)
LR=1.43mHRS=4.1Ω
Peaks at 76%
36
LOAD RESISTANCE VS. OUTPUT VOLTAGE
Load Resistance (kΩ) Output Voltage (V)
47.7 20.969
41 19.22
32.7 16.28
29.9 16.8
25.1 14.26
19.6 10.1
14.9 8.39
11.4 7.48
5.6 4.16
37
LOAD RESISTANCE VS. OUTPUT VOLTAGE
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
5
10
15
20
25
Load Resistance (kΩ)
Outp
ut
Volt
age (
V)
The output voltage is dependent on the load resistance; their relationship is somewhat linear.
38
POWER EFFICIENCY
Input Voltage (V)
Output Voltage (V)
Load Resistance (kΩ)
Power Output (mW)
Power Input (mW)
Power Efficiency (%)
0.235 4.06 27 0.611 0.003 18.1
0.235 5.12 47 0.558 0.003 16.6
0.88 15 27 8.333 0.047 17.6
0.89 20.969 47 9.355 0.048 19.4
Crude Power Efficiency for the 1.43mH coil using a 76% duty cycle.
39
OUTPUT VOLTAGE VS. FREQUENCY
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4 4.4 4.8 5.2 5.6 6 6.4 6.8 7.2 7.60
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22L=1.43mH, R=4.1Ω
L=2.46mH, R=4.3Ω
L=2.08mH, R=4.2Ω
Frequency (kH)
Outp
ut
Volt
ages (
V)
ƒ=n/τn=1,2,3,4τ=L/RS
Output voltage vs frequency for various coil sizes. An input voltage of 0.89 V is held constant at 1kHz for each coil.
40
REFERENCES
1. H. Jiang, D. Lan, D. Lin, J. Zhang, S. Liou, H. Shahnasser, M. Shen, M. Harrison, and S.Roy, “A Feed-Forward Controlled AC-DC Booster for Biomedical Implants”, in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012
2. H. Jiang, B. Lariviere, J. Zhang, S. Liou, H. Shahnasser, M. Shen, M. Harrison, and S. Roy, “A Low Switching Frequency AC-DC Boost Converter for Wireless Powered Miniaturized Implants”, 2012
3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1502062/
4. http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/23/hmo-medical-implants-business-health-care-batteries.html
5. http://www.dvclub.info/il-pacemaker-biologico-tutto-naturale/
6. http://www.atlantichealth.org/gagnon/our+services/treatment+services/cardiac+surgery/pacemaker+and+defibrillator+implantation
7. Baker, et al., "Feedback analysis and design of RF power links for low-power bionic systems." Biomedical Circuits and Systems, IEEE Trans. on 1(1): 28-38.