2013 physica
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 2013 Physica
1/5
This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text.
Download details:
This content was downloaded by: dramican
IP Address: 79.101.164.228
This content was downloaded on 15/11/2013 at 17:43
Please note that terms and conditions apply.
Artificial neural networks for processing fluorescence spectroscopy data in skin cancer
diagnostics
View the table of contents for this issue, or go to thejournal homepagefor more
2013 Phys. Scr. 2013 014057
(http://iopscience.iop.org/1402-4896/2013/T157/014057)
ome Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_10/iopscience.iop.org/page/termshttp://iopscience.iop.org/1402-4896/2013/T157http://iopscience.iop.org/1402-4896http://iopscience.iop.org/http://iopscience.iop.org/searchhttp://iopscience.iop.org/collectionshttp://iopscience.iop.org/journalshttp://iopscience.iop.org/page/aboutioppublishinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/contacthttp://iopscience.iop.org/myiopsciencehttp://iopscience.iop.org/myiopsciencehttp://iopscience.iop.org/contacthttp://iopscience.iop.org/page/aboutioppublishinghttp://iopscience.iop.org/journalshttp://iopscience.iop.org/collectionshttp://iopscience.iop.org/searchhttp://iopscience.iop.org/http://iopscience.iop.org/1402-4896http://iopscience.iop.org/1402-4896/2013/T157http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_10/iopscience.iop.org/page/terms -
8/12/2019 2013 Physica
2/5
IOP PUBLISHING PHYSICASCRIPTA
Phys. Scr.T157(2013) 014057 (4pp) doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T157/014057
Artificial neural networks for processing
fluorescence spectroscopy data in skincancer diagnostics
L Lenhardt, I Zekovic, T Dramicanin and M D Dramicanin
Institute for Nuclear Sciences Vinca, University of Belgrade, PO Box 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia
E-mail:[email protected]
Received 25 August 2012
Accepted for publication 14 January 2013
Published 15 November 2013
Online atstacks.iop.org/PhysScr/T157/014057
Abstract
Over the years various optical spectroscopic techniques have been widely used as diagnostic
tools in the discrimination of many types of malignant diseases. Recently, synchronous
fluorescent spectroscopy (SFS) coupled with chemometrics has been applied in cancer
diagnostics. The SFS method involves simultaneous scanning of both emission and excitation
wavelengths while keeping the interval of wavelengths (constant-wavelength mode) or
frequencies (constant-energy mode) between them constant. This method is fast, relatively
inexpensive, sensitive and non-invasive. Total synchronous fluorescence spectra of normal
skin, nevus and melanoma samples were used as input for training of artificial neural
networks. Two different types of artificial neural networks were trained, the self-organizing
map and the feed-forward neural network. Histopathology results of investigated skin sampleswere used as the gold standard for network output. Based on the obtained classification
success rate of neural networks, we concluded that both networks provided high sensitivity
with classification errors between 2 and 4%.
PACS numbers: 87.19.xj, 87.64.K, 87.64.kv
1. Introduction
Skin cancer is one of the most common malignancies
worldwide. Late detection delivers high mortality rates, but
if diagnosed in the early stages it is one of the most treatableforms of cancer. Taking this problem into account, developingnew methods for cancer diagnosis is of crucial significance.In the last few decades, in the field of cancer diagnostics,fluorescence spectroscopy has proven to be a very promising
technique (Alfano et al 1987,Sterenborg et al 1994,Palmeret al2003).
Human tissues are a complex mixture of differentmolecules and some of these molecules, called endogenousfluorophores, have the ability to absorb and emit light ofdifferent wavelengths. The concentration and distribution ofvarious fluorophores in the skin such as nicotinamide adenine
dinucleotide (NADH), flavine adenine dinucleotide (FAD),
keratin, collagen, elastin, amino acids, lipids and porphyrinsare the fundamentals for discrimination between cancer andnormal tissue by fluorescence spectroscopy. In recent years ithas been shown that synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy
(SFS) can be successfully used in cancer detection (Vo-Dinh2000, Vengadesan et al 2002, Dramicanin et al 2005,2006, 2011). This method involves simultaneous scanningof both emission and excitation wavelengths while keeping
the interval of wavelengths (constant-wavelength mode) orfrequencies (constant-energy mode) between them constant.The advantage of a synchronous spectrum over ordinaryemission spectra is that it often has more features andprovides more information. The obtained data are usuallyhighly correlated with subtle differences between abnormaland normal tissues, and for this purpose artificial neuralnetworks (ANN) can be very useful for building a diagnosticmodel. ANN is an adaptive system that modifies structurebased on input findings to generate robust output. The benefitof this method is its consistency and objectivity due tolack of human fatigue and bias. In this paper, two differenttypes of ANN were trained, the self-organizing map (SOM)
and the feed-forward neural network. SOM is one of themost popular neural networks that convert high-dimensionalnonlinear statistical relationships into simple geometricrelationships in an unsupervised way (Kohonen 2001).
0031-8949/13/014057+04$33.00 1 2013 The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Printed in the UK
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T157/014057mailto:[email protected]://stacks.iop.org/PhysScr/T157/014057http://stacks.iop.org/PhysScr/T157/014057mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T157/014057 -
8/12/2019 2013 Physica
3/5
Phys. Scr.T157(2013) 014057 L Lenhardtet al
Figure 1. Total synchronous fluorescence spectra of different skin sample types: (a) melanoma, (b) nevus and (c) normal skin.
Unlike SOM, the feed-forward neural network is trained in
a supervised way with prior knowledge of a samples group
membership by data entering at the inputs passing through
layers of neurons until it arrives at the outputs without any
feedback information between layers (Jiang et al 2003).
ANN are often trained to be further used as classification
models (Rhee et al 2005, Dramicanin et al 2009). The aim
of this work was to investigate the possibility of building a
skin cancer diagnostic method by training ANN using total
fluorescence spectra of different types of skin lesions.
2. Materials and methods
Synchronous fluorescence spectra of 50 skin samples (12
melanoma, 18 nevus and 20 normal skin samples) were
measured ex vivo using a fluorescence spectrophotometer
(Perkin Elmer LS45) in constant-wavelength mode. The
spectra were collected at a scan rate of 200 nm min1 in the
excitation range from 330 to 550 nm and the wavelength
offset range from 30 to 120 nm and automatically
normalized to excitation by the instrument. Samples were
obtained from human patients soon after surgical resection,
histopathologically identified and then measured by the
instrument at room temperature. In order to reduce the
dimensionality of obtained spectra, principal component
analysis (PCA) was applied. For training, calculated PCA
components were introduced in SOM and the feed-forward
neural network. To assess classification error, they were tested
with new samples unknown to both ANN.
3. Results and discussion
Figure 1 presents total synchronous fluorescence spectra in
the form of contour diagrams of different skin samples:
normal skin, nevus and melanoma. Emission patterns
reflect the specificity of endogenous fluorophores and their
microenvironments in skin. It can be clearly seen that the main
differences in the fluorescence of skin lesions are observable
in several spectral regions. The first region spans the excitation
wavelength from 330 to 400 nm and the synchronous interval
from 30 to 55 nm. Structural proteins of the extracellular
matrix, collagen and elastin have maximum excitation in this
region (Ramanujam 2000). The second and third spectralregions cover the excitation wavelength interval from 430 to
480 nm, 350 to 400nm and the synchronous interval from
30 to 50 nm, 65 to 90 nm, respectively. Fluorescence of
Figure 2. Synchronous fluorescence spectra taken at = 70nmof melanoma (full line), normal skin (dash line) and nevus (dot line)samples.
these regions originates from several fluorophores like the
co-enzymes NADH and FAD.A skin cancer diagnostic method based on measurement
of SFS and a classification model built using two different
ANN was developed in several steps. First reduction of
dimensionality was necessary due to the large size of gathered
SFS. For that purpose PCA was applied on SFS data
and a five-component PCA model was acquired. PCA is
an unsupervised statistical method used to distinguish and
identify patterns in data and express them in such a manner
as to point out their similarities and differences. This method
transforms a number of possibly correlated variables into
a smaller number of uncorrelated variables called principal
components, which account for most of the variance in theobserved variables. This allowed us to explore our data and
to determine for which wavelength offset value () best
separation between groups was achieved. After examining the
results of PCA, it was concluded that the best differentiation
between classes is for = 70 nm, figure2.In figure3 one
can see an obvious distinction between classes. Taking this
into consideration, 25 samples PCA scores for = 70nm
were used to train SOM and the feed-forward neural network.
In order to enlarge the number of samples for ANN training,
we created a normally distributed set of data based on the
mean value and standard deviation of 25 samples used for
training. With a new data set of 2000 samples we trained both
ANN.SOM learns to group data based on similarity and
topology, and as a result it assigns the same indices to each
class. It is used for reduction of dimensionality and clustering
2
-
8/12/2019 2013 Physica
4/5
Phys. Scr.T157(2013) 014057 L Lenhardtet al
Figure 3. PCA scores obtained from SFS data taken at = 70nmof melanoma, normal skin and nevus samples.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the SOM architecture.
data. We introduced a 2000 5 matrix (2000 samples and 5
parameters describing every sample) to SOM with 3 neurons
(size 1 3), figure4,and started training with 150 iterations.
Through all this, SOM did not have any information about the
samples group membership (unsupervised learning). When
trained, SOM was tested with 25 new samples unknown to
the network and the classification error was acquired. This
process of SOM training and testing was repeated several
times, every time using a different combination of data for
training and testing. Doing this we obtained a more accurate
efficiency overview of this method.
Feed-forward networks, figure5,contain series of layers.
The first layer gets network input data, and each subsequent
layer is connected to the previous layer while the final layer
gives network output. They are usually used for input to output
mapping. We used the feed-forward network with one hidden
layer to build a classification model by giving it as input the
2000 5 matrix, the same matrix used for SOM training, and
the matrix with information of class membership of all 2000
samples (supervised learning). The process of testing was the
same as for SOM; several models were built and tested using
different combinations of data, and the mean classification
error for all models was calculated.
Based on the obtained classification errors of neuralnetworks, we found that both networks provide high
sensitivity with classification errors between 2 and 4%. For
different input data the SOM classification error was between
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the feed-forward networkarchitecture.
2 and 3%, while for the feed-forward network it was between
3 and 4%.
4. Conclusion
In this work, we used statistical analysis and ANN to classify
data of synchronous fluorescence spectra with the aim of
developing a diagnostic method for skin cancer diagnosis. The
fluorescence spectra of three different types of skin lesions,
melanoma, nevus and normal skin, revealed differences
between them due to differences in concentration of various
fluorophores and their microenvironments. The application of
PCA provided data with enlarged variances between sample
groups. It is shown that both SOM and feed-forward neural
networks gave promising results with a 9698% success tissueclassification rate. Moreover, the presented method is fast,
sensitive, inexpensive and non-destructive. Based on these
findings, we can conclude that SFS combined with neural
network-based classification has good potential in melanoma
diagnostics.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Serbian Ministry of Science
and Technological Development (project numbers 173049 and
45020).
References
Alfano R R, Tang G C, Pradhan A, Lam W, Choy D S J and Opher E1987 Fluorescence spectra from cancerous and normal humanbreast and lung tissuesIEEE J. Quantum Electron. 23180611
Dramicanin T, Dimitrijevic B and Dramicanin M D 2011Application of supervised self-organising maps in breastcancer diagnosis by total synchronous luminescencespectroscopyAppl. Spectrosc.652937
Dramicanin T, Dramicanin M D, Dimitrijevic B, Jokanovic V andLukic S 2006 Discrimination between normal and malignantbreast tissues by synchronous luminescence spectroscopyActaChim. Slov.534449
Dramicanin T, Dramicanin M D, Jokanovic V,Nikolic-Vukosavljevic D and Dimitrijevic B 2005Three-dimensional total synchronous luminescencespectroscopy criteria for discrimination between normal andmalignant breast tissuesPhotochem. Photobiol.8115548
3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1987.1073234http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1987.1073234http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/10-05928http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/10-05928http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/2005-02-15-RA-442http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/2005-02-15-RA-442http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/2005-02-15-RA-442http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/10-05928http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JQE.1987.1073234 -
8/12/2019 2013 Physica
5/5
Phys. Scr.T157(2013) 014057 L Lenhardtet al
Dramicanin T, Zekovic I, Dimitrijevic B, Ribar S andDramicanin M D 2009 Optical biopsy method for breastcancer diagnosis based on artificial neural networkclassification of fluorescence landscape dataActa Phys. Pol. A1166902
Jiang X and Wah A H K S 2003 Constructing and trainingfeed-forward neural networks for pattern classificationPatternRecognit.3685367
Kohonen T 2001Self-Organizing Maps3rd edn (Berlin: Springer)Palmer G M, Keely P J, Breslin T M and Ramanujam N 2003
Autofluorescence spectroscopy of normal and malignanthuman breast cell linesPhotochem. Photobiol.784629
Ramanujam N 2000Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry(Chichester, NY: Wiley) pp 2056
Rhee J I, Lee K I, Kim C K, Yim Y S, Chung S W, Wei J andBellgardt K H 2005 Classification of two-dimensionalfluorescence spectra using self-organizing mapsBiochem. Eng. J.2213544
Sterenborg H J C M, Motamedi M, Wagner R F, Duvic M,Thomsen S and Jacques S L 1994 In vivofluorescencespectroscopy and imaging of human skin tumours Laser Med.Sci.9191201
Vengadesan N, Anbupalam T, Hemamalini S, Ebenezar J,Muthvelu K, Koteeswaran D, Aruna P R and Ganesan S C2002 Characterization of cervical normal and abnormal tissuesby synchronous luminescence spectroscopyProc. SPIE4613137
Vo-Dinh T 2000 Principle of synchronous luminescence (SL)technique for biomedical diagnosticsProc. SPIE3911429
4
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00087-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00087-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078%3C0462:ASONAM%3E2.0.CO;2http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078%3C0462:ASONAM%3E2.0.CO;2http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2004.09.008http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2004.09.008http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02590223http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02590223http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02590223http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2004.09.008http://dx.doi.org/10.1562/0031-8655(2003)078%3C0462:ASONAM%3E2.0.CO;2http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00087-0