2014-15...highly qualified, effective faculty and staff direction four home, school, community...

1

2014-15

Socorro Independent School DistrictLeading • Inspiring • Innovating

Socorro Independent School District

Community Engagement Survey

2

Introduction 4

District Rating 5

Elementary Schools 6

PK-8 Schools 14

Middle Schools 16

High Schools 19

Alternative Schools 22

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey 23

Table of Contents

3

Angelica RodriguezBoard President

Paul GuerraTrustee

Antonio ‘Tony’ AyubBoard Vice President

Gary GandaraBoard Secretary

Cynthia Ann NajeraTrustee

Michael A. NajeraTrustee

Hector F. GonzalezTrustee

Socorro ISD Board of Trustees - 2015 Region 19 Board of the YearThe Socorro ISD Board of Trustees consists of seven elected citizens who work with community leaders, families, and educators to develop sound educational policies that support student achievement and ensure the solvency of the district. They are a strong and cohesive team that helps the district continuously set and achieve new levels of excellence. Five of the trustees represent single-member districts and two are elected at-large.

VisionTomorrow’s Leaders Learning Today

MissionThe mission of the Socorro Independent School District is to optimize our students’ academic, artistic, athletic, and interpersonal skills.

SISD Strategic PlanSISD’s Strategic Plan guides the day-to-day work of Team SISD in order to meet the district’s overarching goal of ensuring 100 percent of students graduate from high school prepared for the college and career of their choice. The plan was developed to move the district forward while meeting the needs of SISD’s students, parents and broader community, and serves as the pathways to success while focusing on improving academic achievement of all students. SISD’s Strategic Plan includes five directions:

Direction OneSafe and Supportive Learning Environment

Direction TwoCollege and Career Readiness

Direction ThreeHighly Qualified, Effective Faculty and Staff

Direction FourHome, School, Community Partnerships

Direction FiveAccountability For ALL

4

Socorro Independent School District is committed to maintaining strong home, school and community partnerships in order to increase student academic and behavioral achievement. In accordance with Texas Education Code (TEC) § 39.545(a), SISD self-evaluated and assigned performance ratings for community and student engagement indicators based on results from the 2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey.

The survey results for the district and for each campus in SISD are available in the links above and at right. Also available in the document is a sample of the survey that was completed by each campus.

SISD formulated a committee of district personnel* in order to review and revise the criteria used last year. The Texas Association of School Administrators provided school districts guidance and possible criteria to develop the survey, which SISD took into consideration when developing the survey. The SISD staff members reviewed all of the criteria to ensure it was relevant and could be used to improve the district’s performance.

Once the survey was revised, administrators received a link via Survey Monkey to access and complete with their School Improvement Teams (SIT). All schools were surveyed in the nine areas listed below:

1. Fine Arts2. Wellness and Physical Education3. Community and parental involvement4. 21st Century workforce development program5. Second language acquisition program6. Digital learning environment7. Dropout prevention strategies8. Educational programs for GT students9. Compliance with statutory reporting and policy requirements

The campuses then assigned a rating of 1 = Unacceptable, 2 = Acceptable, 3 = Recognized, or 4 = Exemplary for each of the areas, except for area nine (compliance), which received a rating of either Yes or No.

If you have any questions regarding the survey or you would like to be on the committee to develop additional questions for the nine areas on the SISD Community Engagement Survey for the 2015-2016 school year, please contact the Department of State and Federal Programs’ Assistant Director, Fernie Vasquez, at [email protected] or at (915) 937-1600.

SISD always encourages parents and community members to get involved, and appreciates your continued support in helping the district realize its vision of Tomorrow’s Leaders Learning Today.

*The staff members who participated in the development of the SISD Community Engagement Survey were: Fine Arts – Don Rominsky, Bilingual Education Department – Jennifer Davila, Department of State and Federal Programs – Maria Arias and Fernie Vasquez, Guidance and Counseling – Tammi Mackeben, Career and Technology Education (CTE) – George Thomas, Athletics Department – Dan Ferguson, Advanced Academic Gifted and Talented Program – Rosario Flores, Technology Services Department – Miguel Moreno and Hector Reyna, Department of Research and Evaluation – Kelly McBain, Nurse Manager – Rebecca Madrid, Child Nutritional Services – Shelley Chenausky.

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey

5

District ResultsSOCORRO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Fine Arts Recognized

Second Language Acquisition Recognized

Community and Parental Involvement Recognized

Wellness and Physical Education Recognized

Gifted and Talented Recognized

Dropout Prevention Recognized

Digital Learning Recognized

Compliance Yes

21st Century Workforce Recognized

Overall Results Recognized

6

Elementary SchoolsBENITO MARTINEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Fine Arts Acceptable



Wellness and Physical Education Exemplary




Compliance Yes

21st Century Workforce Acceptable


CAMPESTRE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized

Second Language Acquisition Exemplary

Community and Parental Involvement Exemplary


Gifted and Talented Exemplary

Dropout Prevention Exemplary


Compliance Yes

21st Century Workforce Exemplary

Overall Results Exemplary

CHESTER E. JORDAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



n Americas Boundary n Eastlake Boundary n El Dorado Boundary n Montwood Boundary n Socorro Boundary

7

Elementary SchoolsDR. SUE SHOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



ELFIDA P. CHAVEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



ESCONTRIAS EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTERFine Arts Recognized






Digital Learning Acceptable

Compliance Yes




8

Elementary SchoolsESCONTRIAS/KEYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



H.D. HILLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



HELEN BALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable




Gifted and Talented Acceptable



Compliance Yes




9

Elementary SchoolsHORIZON HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



HUECO ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized






Digital Learning Exemplary

Compliance Yes



HURSHEL ANTWINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes




10

Elementary SchoolsJAMES P. BUTLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



LOMA VERDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



LUJAN-CHAVEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




11

Elementary SchoolsMISSION RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



MYRTLE COOPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



O’SHEA KELEHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




12

Elementary SchoolsROBERT R. ROJAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



SGT. ROBERTO ITUARTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



SIERRA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




13

Elementary SchoolsVISTA DEL SOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes




14

PK-8 SchoolsBILL SYBERT SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



DESERT WIND SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



ERNESTO SERNA SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes




15

PK-8 SchoolsJANE A. HAMBRIC SCHOOL




Wellness and Physical Education Acceptable




Compliance Yes


Overall Results Acceptable

JOHN DRUGAN SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



PASO DEL NORTE SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable

Second Language Acquisition Acceptable




Dropout Prevention Acceptable


Compliance Yes




16

Middle SchoolsCAPT. WALTER E. CLARKE MIDDLE








Compliance Yes



COL. JOHN O. ENSOR MIDDLEFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



MONTWOOD MIDDLEFine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes




17

Middle SchoolsSALVADOR H. SANCHEZ MIDDLE








Compliance Yes



SOCORRO MIDDLEFine Arts Acceptable





Dropout Prevention Acceptable


Compliance Yes



SPC. RAFAEL HERNANDO III MIDDLEFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




18

Middle SchoolsSSG. MANUEL PUENTES MIDDLE








Compliance Yes



SUN RIDGE MIDDLEFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



WILLIAM D. SLIDER MIDDLEFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes




19

High SchoolsAMERICAS HIGH SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



EASTLAKE HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



EL DORADO 9TH GRADE ACADEMYFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes




20

High SchoolsEL DORADO HIGH SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



MISSION EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



MONTWOOD HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




21

High SchoolsOPTIONS HIGH SCHOOL

Fine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes



SOCORRO HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes




22

Alternative SchoolsKEYS ACADEMY

Fine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes




23

Page 1

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey

1. Please Select Campus:

2. Special Events or Cultural opportunity participation. Ex. guest speakers, artists or musicians/field trips for cultural development (All levels)

3. Exhibition / Performance opportunities (All levels) Performance Measure

4. Participation of students in fine art courses, classes. (middle schools and high schools only)

5. Percent of students continuing Fine Arts compared to preceding year. (middle schools and high schools only)

Fine Arts

*Please Select

Campus 6

*Unacceptable Less than the acceptable

number of opportunities

Acceptable 3 opportunities

Recognized 4 opportunities

Exemplary 5 opportunities

N/A

Performance Measure nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

*

Unacceptable Less than the acceptable

number of opportunities

Acceptable Primary 5 Elementary 7

Middle School 8 High School 12

opportunities

Recognized Primary 10 Elementary 14 Middle School 16

High School 24 opportunities

Exemplary Primary 15 Elementary 21 Middle School 24

High School 36 opportunities

N/A


*

Unacceptable Less than 30% of students

are enrolled in fine arts courses / classes.

Acceptable 30% to 59% of students are enrolled in fine arts

courses / classes.

Recognized 60% to 69% of students

enrolled in fine arts courses / classes.

Exemplary 70% or more of students

enrolled in fine arts courses / classes.

N/A


*Unacceptable Less than 50% of students are continuing Fine

Arts

Acceptable 51% 69 % of students are

continuing Fine Arts

Recognized 70%80% of students are

continuing Fine Arts

Exemplary Greater than 80% of students are continuing Fine

Arts

N/A


24

Page 2

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey6. Participation in UIL or district supported competition opportunities. TMEA All Region

Band/Choir/Orchestra Visual Arts VASE Regional Competition. (middle schools and high schools only)

7. Fine Arts UIL or district supported competition outcome group. (middle schools and high schools only)

8. Fine Arts UIL or district supported competition outcome individual. (high schools only)

*

Unacceptable Less than 20% participation of Fine Arts students in

competition.

Acceptable 20% to 49% participation of Fine Arts students in

competition.

Recognized 50 to 65% participation of Fine Arts students in

competition.

Exemplary More than 65% participation of Fine Arts students in

competition.

N/A


*

Unacceptable Did not participate in UIL Fine

Arts Competition

Acceptable All Participating groups

received performance ratings of Average,

Excellent or Superior

Recognized All Participating groups

received performance ratings of Excellent or

Superior

Exemplary All Participating groups

received performance ratings of Superior

N/A


*

Unacceptable Did not participate in UIL Fine

Arts Competition

Acceptable 12 or more students earned

district acknowledgement

Recognized 10 or more students earned

regional/area acknowledgement

Exemplary 2 or more students qualified for

state N/A


25

Page 3


1. Percent of ELL students participating in extracurricular activities. (All levels)

2. Open House opportunities for parents of ELL students. (All levels)

3. Tutoring opportunities for ELL students. (All levels)

4. Utilizing sheltered instruction ELPS strategies within instruction. (All levels)

5. Availability of language tools for students. (All levels)

6. LPAC meetings and documentation in compliance. (All levels)

Second Language Acquisition Survey

*Unacceptable 010%

of ELL students participating in school

activities

Acceptable 1120% of ELL students

participating in school activities

Recognized 2130% of ELL students

participating in school activities

Exemplary Greater than 31% of ELL

students participating in school activities

N/A


*Unacceptable Open

houses are not planned for ELL

students/parents

Acceptable 1 open houses is planned for ELL students/parents

Recognized 2 open houses are planned for ELL students/parents

Exemplary Greater than 3 open houses are

planned for ELL students/parents

N/A


*Unacceptable

Tutoring is not offered at campus

Acceptable 13 tutorials are offered to

ELL students on campus

Recognized 45 tutorials are offered to

ELL students on campus

Exemplary More than 6 tutorials are offered

to ELL students on campus

N/A


*Unacceptable

Teachers do not utilize sheltered instructional

strategies

Acceptable Teachers utilize sheltered

instructional strategies for 1 day of the week

Recognized Teachers utilize sheltered

instructional strategies for 2 days of the week

Exemplary Teachers utilize sheltered

instructional strategies for 3 or more days of

the week

N/A


*Unacceptable

Language tools are not provided for students

Acceptable Language tools are made

available for students in at least one content

area

Recognized Language tools are made available for

students in at least two content areas

Exemplary Language tools are made

available for students in at least three or more content areas

N/A


*Unacceptable LPACs are not held at campus and documentation is

not in order

Acceptable LPACs are held once a

semester and documentation is

somewhat in order

Recognized LPACs are held once a month and documentation is generally kept in order

Exemplary LPACs are held once a month and more often when items need to be addressed;

documentation is always in order and in

compliance

N/A


26

Page 4


1. Distribution of District Parental Involvement Policy. (All levels)

2. Distribution of Campus Parental Involvement Policy. (All levels)

3. Distribution and collection of Student/Parent/Teacher Compacts to all parents with required signatures (All levels)

4. A survey regarding available parenting classes and workshops was provided to parents. (All levels)

5. Provided notice to parents of students in testing grade levels of State STAAR requirements and expectations. (All levels)

6. Provided notice to parents of Highly Qualified Teachers. (All levels)

Community and Parental Involvement

*Unacceptable Less than 70% of parents

received policy

Acceptable 7179% of parents received policy

Recognized 8089% of parents received

policy

Exemplary 90100% of parents received

policyN/A


nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj


received policy

Acceptable 7179% of parents received policy



policyN/A




received compact

Acceptable 70 to 79% of parents received

compact

Recognized 80 to 89% of parents

received compact


compactN/A




received survey

Acceptable 70 to 79% of parents received

survey


survey


surveyN/A




received notice

Acceptable 70 79% of parents received

notice


notice


noticeN/A




received notice

Acceptable 7079% of parents received notice


notice


noticeN/A



27

Page 5

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey7. Campus convened Title I, Annual Meeting with parents. (All levels)

8. Held a parent/teacher conference during 1st and 2nd semester. (All levels)

9. Offered workshops and trainings for parents on literacy, technology, bullying prevention and student achievement. (All levels)

10. Communicated with parents of participating children regarding school and parent program information or activities in language they understand. (All levels)

*Unacceptable Did not

convene a Title I Annual meeting

Acceptable N/ARecognized Held one

annual meeting Exemplary Held two annual

meetings


nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

*Unacceptable Did not

hold any parent/teacher

conference

Acceptable Held 1 parent/teacher

conference

Recognized Held 2 parent/teacher

conference

Exemplary Held 3 or more parent/teacher

conference N/A



*Unacceptable Held 8 workshops throughout

the year

Acceptable Held 16 workshops throughout

the year

Recognized Held 20 workshops throughout

the year

Exemplary Held 28 workshops throughout

the yearN/A



*Unacceptable Less than 70% of parents receive information

Acceptable 7079% of parents receive

information

Recognized 8089% of parents receive

information

Exemplary 90100% of parents receive

informationN/A



28

Page 6


1. Middle school and /or high school students are taught sexuality curriculum. (middle schools and high schools only)

2. School gyms is accessible and supervised during lunch. (middle schools and high schools only)

3. Campus staff follows up on all bullying incidents and reports to ensure student safety. (All levels)

4. Before and after school programs are offered that contain physical activity. (All levels)

5. Physical education students are not removed from class for tutorial sessions. (All levels)

Wellness & Physical Ed.

*Unacceptable Less than 89% of students are taught sexuality curriculum in school.

Acceptable 9094%% of students are taught sexuality curriculum in

school

Recognized 9599% of students are taught sexuality curriculum in

school

Exemplary 100% of students are taught

sexuality curriculum in school

N/A


*Unacceptable School

gym is open and accessible 89% or less during regular school

days. (nontesting days)

Acceptable School gym is open and

accessible 9094% during regular school


Recognized School gym is open and

accessible 9599% during regular school


Exemplary School gym is open and accessible 100%

during regular school days. (nontesting days)

N/A


*Unacceptable 89% or

less of incidents and reports on bullying are

followed up on

Acceptable 9094% of incidents and reports

on bullying are followed up on

Recognized 9599% of incidents and reports


Exemplary 100% of incidents and reports


N/A


*Unacceptable Before

and after school programs that contain physical activity are offered 89% of the

time or less during the school year.

Acceptable Before and after school

programs that contain physical activity are

offered 9094% of the time during the school

year.

Recognized Before and after school

programs that contain physical activity are

offered 9599% of the time during the school

year.

Exemplary Before and after school

programs that contain physical activity are offered 100% of the

time during the school year.

N/A


*Unacceptable 89% or less of students are not removed from PE for

tutorial sessions.

Acceptable 9094% of students are not

removed from PE for tutorial sessions.

Recognized 9499% of students are not


Exemplary 100% of students are never


N/A


29

Page 7

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey6. Students participate in at least 20 minutes of unstructured recess in addition to 30

minutes daily physical education. (elementary schools only)

7. Physical education activity and/or recess is not withheld from a student as punishment. (All levels)

8. All paraprofessionals in physical education are certified. (elementary and middle schools only)

9. PE classes are monitored to maintain the state mandate of 45:1 adulttostudent ratio. (All levels)

*Unacceptable 89 % or

less of students participate in at least

20 minutes of unstructured recess in

addition to 30 minutes daily physical

education

Acceptable 9094% of students participate in at least 20 minutes of unstructured recess in


education

Recognized 9599% of students participate in at least 20 minutes of unstructured recess

in addition to 30 minutes daily physical

education

Exemplary 100% of students participate in at least 20 minutes of unstructured recess in


education

N/A


*Unacceptable 89% or less of students do not

have Physical education activity

and/or recess withheld from them as punishment.

Acceptable 9094% of students do not have Physical education

activity and/or recess withheld from them as

punishment.

Recognized 9599% of students do not have

Physical education activity and/or recess

withheld from them as punishment.

Exemplary 100% of students do not have Physical education

activity and/or recess withheld from them as

punishment.

N/A


*Unacceptable 89% and below of para

professionals in physical education are

certified

Acceptable 9094% of paraprofessionals in

physical education are certified

Recognized 9599% of paraprofessionals in physical education are

certified

Exemplary 100% of paraprofessionals in

physical education are certified

N/A


*Unacceptable 89% or less of all PE classes

are monitored to maintain the state

mandate of 45:1 adulttostudent ratio.

Acceptable 9094% of PE classes are

monitored to maintain the state mandate of 45:1 adulttostudent

ratio.

Recognized 9599% of PE classes are


ratio.

Exemplary 100% of PE classes are


ratio.

N/A


30

Page 8

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey10. Physical education classes offer safe and enjoyable activities for all students

including students with special needs. (All levels)

11. Students have fun in physical education and physical activities. (All levels)

12. Teachers attend professional development in physical education and/or health education. (All levels)

13. Students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at least 50% of class time. (All levels)


less of Physical education classes offer

safe and enjoyable activities for all

students including students with special

needs

Acceptable 9094% of Physical education

classes offer safe and enjoyable activities for all students including students with special

needs

Recognized 9599% of Physical education classes offer safe and

enjoyable activities for all students including students with special

needs

Exemplary 100% of Physical education

classes offer safe and enjoyable activities for all students including students with special

needs

N/A


*Unacceptable 89% or less of students have

fun in physical education and physical

activities.

Acceptable 9094% of students have fun in

physical education and physical activities.

Recognized 9599% of students have fun in physical education and

physical activities.

Exemplary 100% of students have fun in

physical education and physical activities.

N/A



less of PE/Health teachers attend

professional development in

physical education and/or health

education

Acceptable 9094% of PE/Health teachers attend professional

development in physical education

and/or health education

Recognized 9599% of PE/Health teachers

attend professional development in

physical education and/or health

education

Exemplary 100% of PE/Health teachers attend professional

development in physical education

and/or health education

N/A



less of students participate in moderate

to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at least

50% of class time.

Acceptable 9094% of students participate in moderate to vigorous

physical activity (MVPA) at least 50% of

class time.

Recognized 9599% of students participate

in moderate to vigorous physical

activity (MVPA) at least 50% of class time.

Exemplary 100% of students participate in moderate to vigorous

physical activity (MVPA) at least 50% of

class time.

N/A


31

Page 9

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey14. High School students complete 1 semester (0.5 credit) of Health Education for

graduation. (high schools only)

15. High School students complete 1.5 credits of Physical Education classes for graduation. (high schools only)

16. Campus utilizes a sequential, developmentally appropriate Physical Education curriculum designed to implement the TEKS. (All levels)

17. Healthy eating is promoted to students in a variety of ways in the campus environment. (All levels)

18. Concession stands at school related events outside the school day are encouraged to provide healthy food options, offer plain water, and limit portion sizes to meet state and federal nutrition standards. (middle schools and high schools only)


less of high school students complete 1

semester (0.5 credit) of Health Education for

graduation.

Acceptable 9094% of high school students complete 1 semester (0.5 credit) of Health

Education for graduation.

Recognized 9599% of high school students complete 1 semester (0.5 credit) of Health


Exemplary 100% of high school students complete 1 semester (0.5 credit) of Health


N/A


*Unacceptable 89 % or

less of students complete 1.5 credits of

Physical Education classes for graduation.

Acceptable 9094% of students complete1.5

credits of Physical Education classes for

graduation.

Recognized 9599% of students

complete1.5 credits of Physical Education

classes for graduation.

Exemplary 100% of students complete 1.5

credits of Physical Education classes for

graduation.

N/A



less of PE/Health teachers utilizes a

sequential, developmentally

appropriate Physical Education curriculum

designed to implement the TEKS

Acceptable 9094% of PE/Health teachers

utilizes a sequential, developmentally



Recognized 9599% of PE/Health teachers utilizes a sequential,

developmentally appropriate Physical Education curriculum


Exemplary 100% of PE/Health teachers

utilizes a sequential, developmentally



N/A


*Unacceptable 0

Classroom Presentations

Acceptable 01 Classroom

Presentations

Recognized 12 Classroom

Presentations

Exemplary 2 or More Classroom

Presentations N/A


*

Unacceptable 0 Healthy options offered

Acceptable 12 Healthy options offered

Recognized 23 Healthy Options

offered

Exemplary 3 or More Healthy Options

offeredN/A


32

Page 10

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey19. Notice given regarding needed immunizations. (All levels)

20. Participation in free vaccination clinics. (All levels)

21. Campus immunization compliance rate. (All levels)

22. Coordinating flu clinics for students, staff, parents of community. (All levels)

23. School nurse participates in Campus/District safety committees. (All levels)

24. School nurse coordination of CPR training for employees who are members of the campus Emergency Response Team. (All levels)

25. Health screenings (hearing, vision, dental, spinal curvature, ancanthosis) (elementary and middle schools only)

*Unacceptable <75%

notice given to parentsAcceptable 7584%

notice given to parentsRecognized 8594%

notice given to parentsExemplary 95100%

notice given to parentsN/A


*Unacceptable <75%

notice given to parentsAcceptable 7584%

notice given to parentsRecognized 8594%

notice given to parentsExemplary 95100%

notice given to parentsN/A


*Unacceptable <75%

compliance rateAcceptable 7584%

compliance rateRecognized 8594%

compliance rateExemplary 95100%

compliance rateN/A


*Unacceptable <2 clinics per feeder

pattern

Acceptable 3 clinics per feeder pattern

Recognized 4 clinics per feeder pattern

Exemplary 5 clinics per feeder pattern

N/A


*Unacceptable Nurse participates in 1 safety

committee meeting per year

Acceptable Nurse participates in 2 or 3

safety committee meetings per year

Recognized Nurse participates in 3 or 4

safety committee meetings per year

Exemplary Nurse participates in all safety committee

meetings throughout the school year

N/A


*Unacceptable <80% of school employees on the Emergency

Response Team are CPR trained

Acceptable 8090% of school employees on

the Emergency Response Team are

CPR trained

Recognized 9195% of school employees on the Emergency


Exemplary 96100% of school employees on the Emergency


N/A


*Unacceptable <8089% of our campus students requiring

screenings are screened

Acceptable 9094% of our campus students requiring screenings

are screened

Recognized 9597% of our campus students

requiring screenings are screened

Exemplary 97100% of our campus students

requiring screenings are screened

N/A


33

Page 11

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey26. Availability of school nurses. (All levels)

27. School nurse collaborates with PE coaches & Health Teachers in the coordination of health/wellness events (health fairs, Wellness Wednesdays, Fitness Fridays, Family Fun Fitness, Health education for students, staff and parents etc.) Education on Healthy Topics: Nutrition, physical exercise, stress reduction, etc.. (All levels)

*Unacceptable <85% of the time the RN is

available during school hours

Acceptable 8590% of the time the RN is


Recognized 9198% of the time the RN is


Exemplary 99100% of the time the RN is


N/A


*

Unacceptable <2 School Health

Wellness campus events per year

Acceptable 3 School Health Wellness

campus events per year

Recognized 4 School Health Wellness

campus events per year

Exemplary 5 School Health Wellness

campus events per year N/A


34

Page 12


1. Identified GT students reflect total campus subgroups/demographics. (All levels)

2. Parents are informed of process for nomination/selection of GT students and program services. (All levels)

3. Parents of GT students are invited to district and campus information/support sessions throughout the year, at least twice at the campus (fall/spring) and bimonthly whenever possible at the district level. (All levels)

4. Campus provide a written plan to parents on how GT identified students will be served throughout the year. (All levels)

Gifted and Talented

*Unacceptable Less

than 79% of GT identified students

reflect total campus populations

Acceptable 8089% of GT identified students


Recognized 9099% of GT identified

students reflect total campus populations

Exemplary 100% of GT identified students


N/A


*Unacceptable Less than 89% of parents are informed of GT

nomination /selection

Acceptable 9094% of parents are informed of

GT nomination /selection

Recognized 9599% of parents are informed

of GT nomination /selection

Exemplary 100% of parents are informed of

GT nomination /selection

N/A


*

Unacceptable Less than 89% of GT

parents are invited to information /support

sessions throughout the year, at least twice at

the campus (fall/spring) and bimonthly

whenever possible at the district level.

Acceptable 9094% of GT parents are invited to information /support sessions throughout the year, at least twice at



Recognized 9599% of GT parents are

invited to information /support

sessions throughout the year, at least twice at



Exemplary 100% of GT parents are invited to information /support sessions throughout the year, at least twice at



N/A


*Unacceptable Less

than 89% of parents of GT students receive a

written plan on how GT identified students will be provided services throughout the year.

Acceptable 9094% of parents of GT students receive a written plan on how GT identified

students will be provided services

throughout the year.

Recognized 9599% of parents of GT

students receive a written plan on how GT identified students will be provided services throughout the year.

Exemplary 100% of parents of GT students receive a written plan on how GT identified

students will be provided services

throughout the year.

N/A


35

Page 13

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey5. GT identified students are provided opportunities to work together as a group, work

with other students, and work independently during the school day. (All levels)

6. Learning opportunities are provided for all GT identified students which may include pull out programs, GT classes, and/or out of school options. For Secondary only: dual credit, PreAP, AP, Pre IB, IB, out of school options or GT classes. (All levels)

7. GT identified students are provided opportunities to participate in competitions such as Academic UIL, Academic Decathlon, History Day, Team Quest, Destination Imagination and other competitions as well as field trips throughout the school year. (All levels)

*Unacceptable Less

than 89% of GT students are provided

the opportunity to work together as a group,

work with other students and work

independently during the school day.

Acceptable 9094% of GT students are

provided the opportunity to work

together as a group, work with other students

and work independently during

the school day.

Recognized 9599% of GT students are




the school day.

Exemplary 100% of GT students are




the school day.

N/A


Unacceptable Less than 89% of GT identified students are provided

learning opportunities which may include pull out

programs, GT classes, and/or out of school options. For

Secondary only: dual credit, PreAP, AP, Pre IB, IB, out

of school options or GT classes.

Acceptable 9094% of GT identified students are

provided learning opportunities which may

include pull out programs, GT classes, and/or out of

school options. For Secondary only: dual credit, PreAP, AP, Pre IB, IB, out


Recognized 9599% of GT identified students are





Exemplary 100% of GT identified students are





Performance Measure nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj nmlkj

Unacceptable Less than 89% GT

identified students are provided opportunities

to participate in competitions such as

Academic UIL, Academic Decathlon,

History Day, Team Quest, Destination

Imagination and other competitions as well as

field trips throughout the school year.

Acceptable 9094% GT identified students

are provided opportunities to participate in

competitions such as Academic UIL,

Academic Decathlon, History Day, Team Quest, Destination

Imagination and other competitions as well as

field trips throughout the school year.

Recognized 9599% GT identified students

are provided opportunities to

participate in competitions such as



Imagination and other competitions as well as field trips throughout

the school year.

Exemplary 100% GT identified students are provided opportunities

to participate in competitions such as



Imagination and other competitions as well as field trips throughout

the school year.

N/A


36

Page 14

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey8. GT Identified students participate in Texas Performance Standards Projects and/or

other approved projects. (All levels)

9. Teachers who provide services for GT students have received 30 hours of professional development in Gifted and Talented Education within the 1st semester. (All levels)

*Unacceptable Less

than 89% of GT Identified students

participate in Texas Performance Standards

Projects and/or other approved projects.

Acceptable 9094% of GT Identified students

participate in Texas Performance Standards

Projects and/or other approved projects.

Recognized 9599% of GT Identified

students participate in Texas Performance Standards Projects

and/or other approved projects.

Exemplary 100% of GT Identified students participate in Texas

Performance Standards Projects and/or other

approved projects.

N/A


*

Unacceptable Less than 79 %Teachers

who provide services for GT students have received 30 hours of

professional development in Gifted

and Talented Education within the

1st semester.

Acceptable 8089 %Teachers who provide

services for GT students have received 30 hours

of professional development in Gifted


1st semester.

Recognized 9099 %Teachers who provide




1st semester.

Exemplary 100 %Teachers who provide




1st semester.

N/A


37

Page 15


1. Provide students with safe learning environment. (All levels)

2. Campus provides tutorial services for students whose grade in a subject for a reporting period is lower than the equivalent of 70 on a scale of 100 to attend tutorials. (All levels)

3. Community collaboration exist through partnerships with colleges and universities in the El Paso area. (All levels)

4. Number of students participating in the CHAMPS Mentoring Program. (All levels)

5. Campus provides intensive afterschool opportunities (including mornings and Saturdays) in the areas of Math and Science. (All levels)

Dropout Prevention

*Unacceptable Less than 70% of students

feel safe at school

Acceptable 7180% of students feel safe at

school

Recognized 8189% of students feel safe at

school

Exemplary 90100% of students feel safe at

schoolN/A


*

Unacceptable 84% and below of students who receive notice for

tutoring services attend.

Acceptable 8589% of students who receive

notice for tutoring services attend.

Recognized 9096% of students who receive


Exemplary 97100% of students who receive


N/A


*

Unacceptable No partnerships exist with all local colleges and universities in the El

Paso Area

Acceptable Proposals are in progress to

create partnerships with all local colleges and universities in the El

Paso Area

Recognized Few partnerships exist with all local colleges and universities in the El

Paso Area

Exemplary Partnerships exist with all local colleges and universities in the El

Paso Area

N/A


*Unacceptable

Campus does not offer the CHAMPS

Mentoring Program

Acceptable Campus has 05 mentees

Recognized Campus has 5 20 mentees

Exemplary Campus has 2050 mentees

N/A


*Unacceptable 84%

and below of students who receive notice for

tutoring services attend.

Acceptable 8589% of students who receive


Recognized 9096% of students who receive


Exemplary 97100% of students who receive


N/A


38

Page 16

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey6. Student Goal Setting. (All levels)

7. RTI, SSI and 504 plans. (All levels)

8. Campus attendance rate. (All levels)

9. Campus will implement Generation Texas Week to include at least two of the following: guest speakers, presentations and display of diplomas, regalia, colleges and universities. (All levels)

*Unacceptable Less than 70% of students completed SMART

goals

Acceptable 7080% of students completed

SMART goals

Recognized 8199% of students completed

SMART goals

Exemplary 100% of students set SMART

goalsN/A


*Unacceptable 69%

and below of documentation and implementation in

place

Acceptable 7079 % of documentation and

implementation in place

Recognized 8089 %of documentation and


Exemplary 90100% of documentation and


N/A


*Unacceptable

Attendance rate at 94% or lower

Acceptable Attendance rate at 95

96%

Recognized Attendance rate at

96.196.9%

Exemplary Attendance rate at

97% or higherN/A


*

Unacceptable Generation Texas

Week not implemented.

Acceptable Generation Texas

Week implemented with less than two of

the items.

Recognized Generation Texas

Week implemented with two of the items.

Exemplary Generation Texas

Week implemented with more than two of

the items.

N/A


39

Page 17

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey10. Campus will implement school counseling core curriculum lessons (lessons in the

classroom for all students) in the classroom based on academic, personal social and career areas. (All levels)

11. Campus will implement career day based on the five endorsements. (elementary and middle schools only)

12. Percent of referrals to Special Education which have gone through a robust RTI process. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable SCCC: HS 0% MS 0% and

EL 0% of time allotted.

Acceptable SCCC: HS 19%; MS 119%; EL 1

29%

Recognized SSCC HS 1014%; MS 2024%; EL 3044% of

allotted time.

Exemplary School counseling core

curriculum (SCCC) lessons were presented High School 1525%

of the total time allotted; Middle

School 2535% of total time allotted; and Elementary 3545% of total time allotted (time allotted = 6 hrs. per day x 5 days per week x 36 weeks per

year=1,080 hours per year)

N/A


*

Unacceptable Career day was not

implemented.

Acceptable Career day was implemented with 13 endorsements

represented.

Recognized Career day was implemented with at least 4 of the

endorsements represented.

Exemplary Career day was implemented and

there were presentations, speakers,

etc. based on all five endorsements.

N/A


*Unacceptable 069% of referrals have been

through the RTI process

Acceptable 7089% of referrals have been


Recognized 9094% of referrals have been


Exemplary 95100% of referrals have been


N/A


40

Page 18

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey13. Utilizing the 6 different coteaching models. (All levels)

14. Tutoring opportunities for SPED students. (All levels)

15. Provide students who have not performed satisfactorily on STAAR or endofcourse (EOC) assessment with accelerated instruction. (All levels)

16. Number of high school seniors completing their FAFSA application. (high schools only)

17. Number of high school seniors completing their Apply Texas application. (high schools only)

*

Unacceptable Special Ed./General Ed. coteachers only utilize the one teach, one assist model of co

teaching

Acceptable Special Ed./General Ed. coteachers only utilize the team teaching

model of coteaching

Recognized Special Ed./General Ed. co

teachers mostly utilize at least 34 coteach

situations.

Exemplary Special Ed/General Ed. Co

teachers mostly utilize parallel, station,

alternative, and team teaching within coteach settings and

avoid using 1 teach, 1 assist and 1 teach, 1

observe.

N/A


*Unacceptable

Tutoring is not offered at the campus

Acceptable 12 tutorials are offered to

SPED students on campus

Recognized 34 tutorials are offered to

SPED students on campus

Exemplary SPED students are routinely included in at least 5 tutoring opportunities

N/A


*Unacceptable Less than 70% of students receive accelerated

instruction

Acceptable 71 80% of students receive

accelerated instruction

Recognized 8190% of students receive

accelerated instruction

Exemplary 91100% of students receive

accelerated instruction N/A


*Unacceptable 59% or less of students have

completed the FAFSA application process

Acceptable 6069% of students have


Recognized 7079% of students have


Exemplary 80% or more of students have completed the FAFSA

application process

N/A


*Unacceptable Less than 90% of students have completed the

Apply Texas application

Acceptable 9094% of students have

completed the Apply Texas application

Recognized 9599% of students have


Exemplary 100% of students have


N/A


41

Page 19

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey18. Participation by FLS/PAS students in Community Based Instruction. (middle schools

and high schools only)

19. Annual IEP goals and objectives are updated every nine weeks and provided to the parent and/or adult student. (All levels)

20. CTED Program participation by SPED students receiving modified/alternative instruction. (high schools only)

*Unacceptable

FLS/PAS students participate in CBI

activities less than 5 times per year.

Acceptable FLS/PAS students participate in

CBI activities at least 68 times per year.

Recognized FLS/PAS students participate in

CBI activities at least 911 times per year.

Exemplary FLS/PAS students participate in

CBI activities more than 12 times per year.

N/A


*Unacceptable Less than 70% of annual

IEP goals and objectives are updated.

Acceptable 7090% of annual IEP goals and objectives are updated

Recognized 9095% of annual IEP goals and objectives are

updated

Exemplary 95%100% of annual IEP goals and objectives are

updated

N/A


*Unacceptable SPED

students receiving modified/alternative

instruction (who are not already participating in

CTE programs) participate in CTED programs aligned to

postsecondary employment goals at a rate of less than 70%.

Acceptable SPED students receiving

modified/alternative instruction (who are not already participating in


postsecondary employment goals at a

rate of 70%90%

Recognized SPED students receiving




rate of 90%95%

Exemplary SPED students receiving




rate of 95% to 100%

N/A


42

Page 20


1. Educator Preparation and Development. (All levels)

2. Teaching and Learning. (All levels)

3. Infrastructure for Technology. (All levels)

Digital Learning

*Unacceptable

Campus average for Educator Preparation and Development on

the Texas STaR Chart is at Early Tech Level.

Acceptable Campus average for Educator

Preparation and Development on the

Texas STaR Chart is at Developing Tech

Level.

Recognized Campus average for Educator


Texas STaR Chart is at Advanced Tech Level.

Exemplary Campus average for Educator


Texas STaR Chart is at Target Tech Level.

N/A


*Unacceptable

Campus average for Teaching and

Learning on the Texas STaR Chart is at Early

Tech Level.

Acceptable Campus average for Teaching and Learning on the


Level.

Recognized Campus average for Teaching and Learning on the


Exemplary Campus average for Teaching and Learning on the


N/A


*Unacceptable

Campus average for Infrastructure for

Technology on the Texas STaR Chart is at

Early Tech Level.

Acceptable Campus average for

Infrastructure for Technology on the


Level.

Recognized Campus average for



Exemplary Campus average for



N/A


43

Page 21

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey4. Digital/Distance Learning. (high schools utilizing Compass Learning for credit

recovery only)

5. Student Technology Competencies. (middle schools only)

*Unacceptable Less than 80% of students

successfully completing courses for original credit in a digital

environment.

Acceptable 80% 89% of students


environment.

Recognized 90% 94% of students


environment.

Exemplary More than 95% of students


environment.

N/A


*Unacceptable Less than 70% of students meet or exceed the

Proficient Level of the Technology Applications Assessment.

Acceptable 70% 80% of students meet

or exceed the Proficient Level of the

Technology Applications Assessment.

Recognized 81% 90% of students meet



Exemplary More than 90% of students meet



N/A


44

Page 22


1. The Campus Improvement Plan has a complete Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) in narrative format that includes an Introduction, a Summary, and clearly identifies and explains the campus' strengths and improvement needs for each long range goal. (All levels)

2. The Campus Improvement Plan contains objectives for each long range goal that are specific, measurable, attainable, resultsoriented, and timebased. (All levels)

3. All 10 Components of a Title I School wide Program, as per No Child Left Behind, are addressed within the framework of the Campus Improvement Plan (PreK/K Transition applies only to schools with PreK and Kinder students). (All levels)

4. Within each strategy in the Campus Improvement Plan, only titles (no names) of individuals are listed in the "Persons Responsible" column. (All levels)

5. Within each strategy in the Campus Improvement Plan, one or more time descriptions that signify when a strategy will occur have been identified (daily, weekly, monthly, etc.) (All levels)

Compliance

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

45

Page 23

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey6. Within each strategy in the Campus Improvement Plan, a funding source (Title I, State

Compensatory Education, Title III, etc.) and an estimated dollar amount of what has been/will be spent on the strategy have been designated. (All levels)

7. Within the Campus Improvement Plan, strategies appear that describe the roles of campus personnel that are paid with state and/or federal funds (Title I, State Compensatory Education, Title III, etc.). These strategies clearly identify a funding source, FTE numbers, and dollar amounts. (All levels)

8. The Campus Improvement Plan includes CNA narrative information, objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to ensure students safety. (All levels)

9. The Campus Improvement Plan includes CNA narrative information, objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to improve student performance. (All levels)

10. The Campus Improvement Plan includes CNA narrative information, objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to provide professional development to faculty and staff. (All levels)

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

46

Page 24

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey11. The Campus Improvement Plan includes CNA narrative information, objectives, and

strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to improve parent and community involvement in the education of students. (All levels)

12. The Campus Improvement Plan includes CNA narrative information, objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to enhance faculty and staff accountability with regard to student performance. (All levels)

13. Distribution of Agricultural Survey is given to parents yearly. (All levels)

14. Students and parents notified of STAAR results within 10 days of receipt. (All levels)

15. Health screenings are made available on campus (hearing, vision, dental, spinal curvature) (All levels)

16. Home language surveys are collected for every student. (All levels)

*

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

47

Page 25

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey17. Conducted annual evaluation of District/Campus Parental Involvement Policy with

the involvement of parents. (All levels)

18. TEAprepared School Report Cards are made available for parents to access. (All levels)

19. A disciplinary alternative education program (DAEP (KEYS)) shall be supported by the district. (All levels)

20. A TEA approved Coordinated School Health program is implemented in all grade levels. (All levels)

21. Faculty and staff is highly qualified. (All levels)

22. Social Work Program offered through Communities in Schools (CIS). (All levels)

*

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

48

Page 26

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey23. Notices of required notice/postings to website are carried out in a timely manner. (All

levels)

24. Teachers who provide instruction to Gifted and Talented students have received 30 hours of professional development in Gifted and Talented education. (All levels)

25. Teachers who have received 30 hours of professional development in Gifted and Talented education and who provide instruction to Gifted and Talented students receive 6 hours annually of professional development related to Gifted and Talented Education. (All levels)

26. Campus host yearly showcases to demonstrate projects and performances completed by GT Students throughout the year. (All levels)

27. Board approved policies are followed to support GT programs and students. (All levels)

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

49

Page 27

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey28. Administrators and Counselors who have authority over service decisions for Gifted

and Talented Students are required a minimum of 6 hours of professional development in the area of Nature and Needs of GT students. (All levels)

29. Annual IEP goals and objectives are updated every nine weeks and provided to the parent and/or adult student. (All levels)

30. Professional development opportunities were provided to teachers in the areas of sheltered instruction and ELPS. (All levels)

31. Bilingual/ESL teachers received training for ESL academies focused on English acquisition. (All levels)

32. Percent of students reaching Advanced High on TELPAS composite score is equal or above state average. (All levels)

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

50

Page 28

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey33. Online courses for high school credit recovery are offered through (Compass

Learning) (middle schools and high schools only)

34. Campus provides instructional support for ELL students in order to reduce the levels of risk in PBMAS. (All levels)

35. Social Work Program offered through Communities in Schools (CIS). (All levels)

36. Office of Civil Rights (OCR) compliance report is completed. (All levels)

37. School Improvement Audits are made available to parents. (All levels)

38. Adhere to compliance with State required safety plans. (All levels)

*

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

51

Page 29

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey39. Reporting compliance related to NCLB, FIRST Rating, PBMAS, PEIMS,

transportation is carried out in a timely manner. (All levels)

40. Staff evaluations are completed by district or campus deadline. (All levels)

41. Number of State Testing irregularities are reported immediately to district testing coordinators and are reported to TEA in a timely manner. (All levels)

42. All physical education teachers are certified in physical education. (All levels)

43. Elementary school students are provided TEKS based health education instruction. (elementary schools only)

44. High school students are taught P.A.P.A. (Parenting and Paternity Awareness) (high schools only)

*

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

52

Page 30

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey45. Students participate in at least 30 minutes per day of TEKS based physical

education. (All levels)

46. The student to teacher ratio in each class is no more than 45:1 OR if higher, a safety plan is provided. (All levels)

47. Students participate in 30 minutes per day or 135 minutes per week of physical education or structured moderate to vigorous physical activity for four semesters out of six semesters in grades 678. (middle schools only)

48. High school students participating in an approved substitution activity for PE credit participate in at least 100 minutes per 5day school week at a moderate to vigorous physical activity level (state approved substitutions: athletics, marching band, cheerleading, drill team, JROTC, approved offcampus physical activity) (high schools only)

49. Fitness assessment using FITNESSGRAM is conducted at least once per school year for students in grades 312 receiving credit for physical education. (All levels)

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

53

Page 31

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey50. Fitness assessment scores are shared with parents upon request. (All levels)

51. Fitness assessment student scores are reported to TEA on time. (All levels)

52. Teachers are certified in AED, CPR, and First Aid. (All levels)

53. A TEA approved Coordinate School Health program is implemented in all k8 schools. (elementary and middle schools only)

54. A TEA approved Coordinate School Health program is implemented in all k8 schools. (elementary and middle schools only)

55. Adhere to Federal and State guidelines for food served in school environment: vending machines, concessions, in the classroom etc. (All levels)

*

*

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

54

Page 32

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey56. Compliance with ageappropriate guidelines and recommendations for healthy food

and beverage choices during the regular and extended day. (All levels)

57. Elementary school competitive foods are not allowed during schools hours. (elementary schools only)

58. Compliance with USDA nutrition requirements for NSB and NSLP. (All levels)

59. Concession stands at school related events outside the school day are encouraged to provide healthy food options, offer plain water, and limit portion sizes to meet state and federal nutrition standards. (All levels)

*

*

*

*

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

Yes

nmlkj

No

nmlkj

N/A

nmlkj

55

Page 33


1. Percent of students completing CTE programs that lead to recognized certifications or licenses. (high schools only)

2. Percent of workforce articulated courses offered for students. (high schools only)

3. Percent of workforce dual credit courses offered for students. (high schools only)

4. Percent of students completing coherent sequence of CTE courses. (high schools only)

5. Percent of students participating in career assessments. (i.e. Career Cruising & College to Careers) (middle schools only)

6. Number of student centered college and career readiness enrichment opportunities (i.e. Guest Speakers, College Visits, Career Days/ Fairs, Science Fairs) (All levels)

21st Century Workforce

*Unacceptable 0 25%

of CTE graduates received certification or license or on pathway

to obtain.

Acceptable 25% to 50% of CTE graduates received certification or license or on pathway

to obtain.

Recognized 50% to 75% of CTE graduates received certifications

or licenses or on pathway to obtain.

Exemplary 75% or higher CTE graduates received certifications

or licenses or on pathway to obtain.

N/A


*Unacceptable 10% of

CTE courses are offered as articulated

or dual credit.

Acceptable 20% of CTE courses are

offered as articulated or dual credit

Recognized 30% of CTE courses are


Exemplary 40% of CTE courses are


N/A


*Unacceptable 2% Acceptable 5% Recognized 7.50% Exemplary 10% N/A


*

Unacceptable 020% of exiting 12th graders currently enrolled in a CTE workforce course

Acceptable 21% 49% of exiting 12th grades currently enrolled in a CTE workforce course

Recognized 50% 69% of exiting 12th

grades currently enrolled in a CTE workforce course

Exemplary 70% or high of exiting 12th

graders currently enrolled in a CTE workforce course

N/A


*Unacceptable Zero to

10% of exiting 8th graders have

participated in 1 or more Career Assessment.

Acceptable 11 % to 30% of exiting 8th

graders have participated in 1 or

more Career Assessments.

Recognized 31% 50: of exiting 8th graders have participated in 1

or more Career Assessments.

Exemplary 51% or high exiting 8th

graders have participated in 1 or

more Career Assessments.

N/A


*Unacceptable 0

opportunities provided annually

Acceptable 12 opportunities provided

annually

Recognized 35 opportunities provided

annually

Exemplary 6 or more opportunities provided

annuallyN/A


56

Page 34

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey7. Percent of CTE students affiliated with CTE CTSOs. (middle schools and high schools

only)

8. Percentage of CTE students participating in National Technical Honor Society. (high schools only)

9. Percentage of CTE Seniors completed college or technical school visit (Through CTE). (high schools only)

10. CTE Teacher attends Staff Development Opportunities to improve instruction, college preparedness or industry preparedness. (middle schools and high schools only)

11. CTE Teacher obtains or maintains Industry Licenses or Certifications. (middle schools and high schools only)

12. CTE maintains Student Daily Attendance. (middle schools and high schools only)

*Unacceptable 020% are actively involved in

a CTE Organization

Acceptable 2140% are actively involved in

a CTE Organization

Recognized 4050 % are actively involved in

a CTE Organization

Exemplary > 50% are actively involved in a

CTE Organization N/A


*Unacceptable 2% Acceptable 3% Recognized 4% Exemplary 5% N/A


*Unacceptable 035%

visited a college or technical school

Acceptable 3655% Recognized 5675% Exemplary 75 100% N/A


*

Unacceptable Attends an average of 1 staff

developments per year

Acceptable Attends an average of 2 staff


Recognized Attends an average of 3 staff


Exemplary Attends an average of 4 or more

staff developments per year

N/A


*Unacceptable

Average of 1 Industry License or Certification

Per Teacher

Acceptable Average of 2 Industry License or

Certification Per Teacher

Recognized Average of 3 Industry License or


Exemplary Average of 4 Industry License or


N/A


*Unacceptable Average Daily

Attendance of <90%

Acceptable Average Daily Attendance of

9094%

Recognized Average Daily Attendance of

9597%

Exemplary Average Daily Attendance of

98%100%N/A


57

Page 35

2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey2014-2015 SISD Community Engagement Survey13. Organizes and attends business and industry partner meetings. (middle schools and

high schools only)

14. Develops business and industry partners. (middle schools and high schools only)

15. Organizes community service activities. (middle schools and high schools only)

16. Students receiving EPCC Certificate Level 1 (20152016) (high schools only)



*Unacceptable <2

biyearly meeting per program

Acceptable 2 biyearly meetings per program

Recognized >2 biyearly meetings per

program

Exemplary monthly meetings per program

N/A


*Unacceptable 01

Partner per programAcceptable 23

Partners per programRecognized 45

Partners per programExemplary 6 or more partners per program

N/A


*Unacceptable 0 per

programAcceptable 1 per

programRecognized 23 per

programExemplary 4 or more

per programN/A


*Unacceptable 0

studentsAcceptable 1 to 10

studentsRecognized 1120

studentsExemplary 21+

studentsN/A


*Unacceptable 0 to 10


studentsRecognized 21 to 30


studentsN/A


*Unacceptable 0


studentsRecognized 11 to 20


studentsN/A


58

2015 Region 19 Board of the YearSocorro ISD Board of TrusteesAngelica Rodriguez - President

Antonio “Tony” Ayub - Vice PresidentGary Gandara - SecretaryHector Gonzalez - Trustee

Michael Anthony Najera - TrusteeCynthia Ann Najera - Trustee

Paul Guerra - Trustee

Superintendent of SchoolsJosé Espinoza - Ed.D.

Socorro ISD District Service Center12440 Rojas Dr. • El Paso, TX 79928Phn 915.937.0000 • www.sisd.net

The Socorro Independent School District does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age in its programs, activities or employment.

2014-15...highly qualified, effective faculty and staff direction four home, school, community...

Documents