2015 sba water quality - california department of … sba...• lyda s. hakes, pe...

28
2014-2015 SBA Water Quality Lyda S. Hakes, ACWD Brian Keil, Zone 7 Laura Young, SCVWD 1

Upload: dangtu

Post on 01-May-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

2014-2015 SBA Water Quality

Lyda S. Hakes, ACWD

Brian Keil, Zone 7

Laura Young, SCVWD

1

South Bay Aqueduct

2

• State Water Project

fed by two sources o Delta

o Lake Del Valle

• 10.8 miles of canal

• 32.1 miles of pipeline

• 1.8 miles of tunnel

• Max annual

allocation o Zone 7: 80,619 AFA

o ACWD: 42,000 AFA

o SCVWD: 100,000 AFA

• Lifeline to the Bay

Area

ACWD

Zone 7

SCVWD

SF Bay

SBA Treatment Plant Processes

3

Zone 7 Water

Agency

Alameda

County

Water

District

Santa Clara Valley

Water District

Process DVWTP PPWTP WTP2 PWTP RWTP

Coagulant Ferric Ferric Ferric Alum Alum

Filtration Conv UF, Conv Conv Conv Conv

Preozone ✓

Intermediate

Ozone ✓

Chlorine ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Chloramine ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

PAC

Adsorption ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

Bromide, ug/L

4

BrO3, TTHMs

2014 2015

TOC, mg/L

5

TTHMs

2014 2015

Electrical Conductivity, μS/cm

6

Upper SMCL

Rec. SMCL

Short-term SMCL

2,200

2014 2015

T&O

7

2014 2015

Algae

8

Filter Cloggers

DWR’s SBA Algae Report

2014 2015

Cyanotoxins

9

DWR’s Delta Cyanotoxins Report

Challenging Water!

10

Bromide

TOC

EC

Algae

SBA-wide Tools

• Request Copper

Sulfate Treatment

+ Controls algal biomass in canals

- Can result in treatment impacts

(short-term)

- Requires GW recharge off-line

• Request Blend from

Lake Del Valle

+ Improves quality & treatability

- Requires balancing of interests

11

Water Quality

Water Supply

Recreation Emergency/ Operational

Storage

Lake Del Valle, Typical operating range: 25,000 to 40,000 AF

ACWD’s WTP2 Process Control Options

Ozone Ferric pH Pre-chlor Flow rate

TOC -- -- --

Bromide -- --

Algae -- --

T&O -- -- --

Turbidity -- --

DRAWBACKS & IMPACTS

BrO3, $$$ $$$, Solids, Color,

Caustic, Coagulation

$$$, Caustic,

Coagulation

$ $$$, Production,

supply optimization

12

ACWD’s Treated Water Quality

…with effort! • Increased chemical

dosages o Ferric, ozone, chlorine, caustic &

CO2

• Cautious bromate control

• Elevated T&O complaints

in July 2014

• Highest-ever ozone

demand in April 2015

• Major filtration challenges

with ozone outage

13

We are managing…

• Bromate o RAA = 2.12 ug/L

• TTHMs o Leaving WTP2 avg = 29 ug/L,

max = 43 ug/L

• T&O o Minimal complaints

• Filtration rates o Consistent with ozone on-line

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

UF

RV

(g

al/s

f)

F1-Poor

F3-Best

F8-Avg

6-yr (2006-2011) average UFRV = 7004 gal/sf

2-yr (2012-2013) average UFRV = 3742 gal/sf

• UFRVs before and during drought conditions

• 6 year bench mark from 2006-2011 for “normal

years”

• 2 year benchmark from 2012-13 for “drought years”

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Ru

n T

ime

(hrs

)

F1-

Poor

F3-Best

F8-Avg

Extremely short filter runs (< 10 hours) in some months.

Significant performance limiting factor requiring constant backwashing of filters.

TOC

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

2

4

6

8

May

-11

Au

g-1

1

No

v-1

1

Feb

-12

May

-12

Au

g-1

2

No

v-1

2

Feb

-13

May

-13

Au

g-1

3

No

v-1

3

Feb

-14

May

-14

Au

g-1

4

No

v-1

4

Feb

-15

May

-15

Au

g-1

5

FeC

l3 (

mg

/L)

TO

C/D

OC

(m

g/L

)

DV Inlet TOC Treated Water TOC FeCl3-Con Time period of UFRV < 6-yr average

Elevated levels of TOC have negative impact on filter performance.

Increased coagulant dose (ferric chloride) greatly improved filter UFRVs ◦ Increased sludge production

• Elevated EC also negatively affecting coagulation and filter performance

o EC range “pre-drought” ~100 uS to ~750 uS

o EC range “drought-period” ~250 uS to ~950 uS

EC

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

May

-11

Au

g-1

1

No

v-1

1

Feb

-12

May

-12

Au

g-1

2

No

v-1

2

Feb

-13

May

-13

Au

g-1

3

No

v-1

3

Feb

-14

May

-14

Au

g-1

4

No

v-1

4

Feb

-15

May

-15

Au

g-1

5

EC

(u

S)

Time period of UFRV < 6-yr average

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

May

-11

Au

g-1

1

No

v-1

1

Feb

-12

May

-12

Au

g-1

2

No

v-1

2

Feb

-13

May

-13

Au

g-1

3

No

v-1

3

Feb

-14

May

-14

Au

g-1

4

No

v-1

4

Feb

-15

May

-15

Au

g-1

5

Ch

lori

de

(pp

m)

Cl Time period of UFRV < 6-yr average

Elevated Chloride levels ◦ Cl range “pre-drought” 15 ppm to 120 ppm ◦ Cl range “drought-period” 25 ppm to 160 ppm

Chloride

Algal Growth

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

0

200

400

600

800

May

-11

Au

g-1

1

No

v-1

1

Feb

-12

May

-12

Au

g-1

2

No

v-1

2

Feb

-13

May

-13

Au

g-1

3

No

v-1

3

Feb

-14

May

-14

Au

g-1

4

No

v-1

4

Feb

-15

May

-15

Au

g-1

5

Alg

al B

iom

ass

(m

g/m

3),

Tem

per

atu

re x

100

0 (d

eg C

)

Flu

ore

scen

ce

DV-Fluor DV7 BiomassTime period of UFRV < 6-yr average

Increased Algal Growth in SBA during the drought

SCVWD

20

SCVWD

21

SCVWD

22

SCVWD

23

SCVWD

SCVWD

SCVWD

SCVWD

Questions? • Lyda S. Hakes, PE

[email protected]

510-668-6515

• Brian Keil

[email protected]

925-454-5769

• Laura Young

[email protected]

408-630-2461

28