2015 Staff Development Day

Matrix of Services

Sharon Rodgers Laura Schneiderman

August 19th, 2015

Lake County Schools

Vision StatementA dynamic, progressive and collaborative learning community embracing change and

diversity where every student will graduate with the skills needed to succeed in postsecondary education and the workplace.

Mission StatementThe mission of the Lake County Schools is to provide every student with individual

opportunities to excel.

We Believe:Education is the foundation for everyone’s future.

Education is a lifelong process.All students can learn.

Students should be civic-minded and embrace future roles in the community.Parents/guardians, community, and schools are partners in a student’s education.

Providing a safe, resource-filled learning environment is essential.Students will graduate prepared for work and postsecondary education.

Summarizing Activity

Complete a Matrix of Services document

Au

gu

st

19

, 2

01

5

Learning Goal: Gain knowledge of the ESE/FEFP Matrix of Services process and the ability to appropriately complete the Matrix of Services for student funding

Pre-Test

Matrix of Services PowerPoint

Complete Sample Matrix

Post-Test

Feedback

Staff Development Day

Standards: Not ApplicableDomain 1:Domain 2: Domain 3:

Objective: To accurately complete a Matrix of Services for student funding

Essential Question: How does one appropriately complete the Matrix of Services?

Vocabulary: ESE, FEFP, Matrix of Services, IEP, Domains, Levels, caret

Agenda

Learning Goal & Scale

Learning Goal:Participants will be able to identify and complete the essential parts of a standard based lesson plan given a standard.

Score

4.0

• Given a standard, the participants will be able to • Differentiate Instruction for all participants (ELL, ESE, High Performing and Low Performing Participants).• After implementation of a lesson participant will be able to reflect on the plan based on assessment data.

3.5 In addition to score 3.0 performance, in-depth inferences and applications with partial success

Score

3.0

The participant, without major errors or omissions, will understand and/or be able to: • Participants will be able to develop a comprehensive standards-based lesson plan by:

• Deconstructing the standard(s) with an understanding of the appropriate assessment level using Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.

• Selecting formative and summative assessments that aligns with the given standard and to ensure students’ understanding.

• Scaffolding (break the lesson into digestible and progressively more complex chunks) lessons based on a given standard.

2.5 No major errors or omissions regarding 2.0 content and partial knowledge of the 3.0 content

Score

2.0

There are no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes. The participant will be able to:• Differentiate between formative and summative assessment.• Understand the different components of a lesson plan

1.5 Partial knowledge of the score 2.0 content, but major errors or omissions regarding score 3.0 content

Score

1.0

With help, a partial understanding of some of the simpler details and processes and some of the more complex ideas and processes. The student can:• Can locate and identify the standard for a given unit in the curriculum blueprint and/or http://cpalms.org.• Given a standard participant will be able to read the coding of a standard.• Identify the different components of a lesson plan.

0.5 With help, a partial understanding of the score 2.0 content, but not the score of 3.0 content

Score 0 Even with help, no understanding or skill demonstrated.

Sample

Please remember to complete

the evaluation in

True North Logic (TNL)

when you have access.