2016 12 12 soluzioni per l'esercizio flessibile dei cicli combinati - … · 2016-12-14 · h...
TRANSCRIPT
University of Genoa
Solutions for Combined Cycle FlexibilityAlessandro Sorce, Phd
Thermochemical Power Group DIME – University of Genoa (Italy)tpg.unige.it
University of Genoa
Who is speaking?
2
• PhD defense on april 2013 on “monitoring and diagnosis of energy Systems” Solide Oxide Fuel Cell Diagnosis (Genius Project) Internship c/o Power diagnostic Center di Siemens (monitoring of European and Asiatic
CCPP)
• Collaboration with Tirreno Power: Diagnostic Control Room (2013-2014) data reconciliation Algorithm: Develop and test Focus on special tasks Global Monitoring and Report system, GMR
• (2015- present) Large Size Power Plant Law for Power Plant management Environmental Impact Flexible Long term monitoring
University of Genoa
About What?
1. Large Size Heavy Duty Gas Turbine
2. HDGT Control Systems:- Control Loops and typical target- Methods for Minimum Environmental Load reduction
3. Combined Cycle Management- Start-up of the Combined Cycle
4. Maintenance cost and the Impact of Flexibilization
5. Monitoring and Diagnosis of CCPP- ST Example
3
University of Genoa
Heavy Duty Gas Turbine are exploited in electricity generation tipicallycoupled with a Steam Bottoming Cycle as a Combined Cycle
Increase of Efficiency and power output is due to the higher Turbine InletTemperature reached, combined with higher pressure ratio.
1. Heavy Duty Gas Turbine
9HA
510 MW
41.8
4
University of Genoa
5
Turbogas General Electric 9FA+eCOMPRESSORE BRUCIATORI TURBINA
Rapporto di compressione
15,4 N° camere di combustione 18 Numero di stadi 3
Numero di stadi 18N° bruciatori per ogni camera
6 Stadi rotorici raffreddati 2
Potenza assorbita 250 MW Tecnologia DLN 2.6+ Stadi statorici raffreddati 3
Temperatura aria all’uscita
390°C
Net Power Output: 261 MW (ISO)
Simple Cycle Efficiency: 37,3 % (ISO)
University of Genoa
6
Turbogas General Electric 9HA
University of Genoa
7
Turbogas Alstom GT26 - ReHeatCOMPRESSORE BRUCIATORI EV TURBINA HP
Rapporto di compressione
34 N° camere di combustione 24 Numero di stadi 1
Numero di stadi 22BRUCIATORI SEV
TURBINA LP
Numero IGV 3 N° camere di combustione 24 Numero di stadi 4
Temperatura aria all’uscita
550°C Gross Power Output 262 MW
High Turn Down Capability: 20% with respect to Base Load
Is the only ReHeated HDGT TOT 615 °C => High Steam CycleEfficiency
Blade Cooling air Temperature is reduced via Steam Cooled Heat Exchangers => Close Integration between GT and Bottoming Cycle
University of Genoa
8
AEN Turbogas GT26 - ReHeat
University of Genoa
9
AEN Turbogas GT36
University of Genoa
Potenza netta: 269 MW (ISO)
Rendimento netto in ciclo aperto: 39,6 % (ISO)
Rapporto di compressione: 17,7 (ISO)
T ingresso Turbina (TIT): 1230 °C
Numero stadi compressore: 15
Numero stadi turbina: 4
Portata metano a MAX carico: ca 19 Nm3/s
Portata dei gas di scarico: 690 kg/s
T gas di scarico (TETC): 570 °C
AE 94.3 A2 (2007)
Turbogas Ansaldo Energia AE94.3 A2
10
University of Genoa
Turbogas
Turbogas Ansaldo Energia AE94.3 AAE 94.3 A (2015)
11
University of Genoa
12
Turbogas Siemens 8000H
Gross Power Output 400 MW12
University of Genoa
In the operating range, Load control is managed by actingon both mass flow rates to control Turbine OutletTemperature (TOT). In fact even if the firingtemperature (FT) and the related Turbine InletTemperature (TIT) are more critical with respect toperformance, environmental and high temperature materialissues, the TOT is easier to measure.
2. Gas Turbine ControlGT Load Control acts over two main parameters to regulate combustion:
• m_f, fuel mass flow rate => Fuel Control Valves• m_a, air mass flow rate => HDGT – Inlet Guide Vanes
Two attributes of the Combustion can be regulated:Quantity (i.e. the amount of energy delivered)Quality (i.e. the combustion temperature)
m_a
m_f
TOT
TIT
13
University of Genoa
In general for a GT the air mass flow rate is proportional to:
• density (suction temperature and pressure)• Section flow (Inlet Guide Vanes position)• Rotational speed
The rotational speed is imposed by the grid, suctionconditions are usually related to ambient conditions:→ the only way to regulate the mass flow rate is the IGV
Inlet Guide Vanes
There are two extreme position: IGV Max - fully openIGV Min - fully closed (bounded by compressor instability issues)
GT Control: IGV, Inlet Guide Vane
14
University of GenoaGT Control: IGV e m_fuel
2. IGV_min (fully closed), increase of the TOT Temperature with the load. Reduction of the air-fuel ratio (AFR), Load Control.3. Regulating IGV, AFR is fairly constant and so TOT, Load Control4. IGV_max (fully open), a load increase (due to increase of fuel) reduces the AFR increasing TOT, until T limitation is reached, Load Control.
1. Start up Phase: GT reaches full speed no load (FSNL). Speed Control
5. Max Load OTC Control
TET = TOT
15
University of GenoaREHEAT GT control: IGV + 2 m_fuel
Regulating IGV, temperatures are controlled to follow a specific OPC (OPerationalConcept)
IGV_max Temperature increases with the Load
Maximum allowed temperature is related to the management mode selected for the machine
IGV_min Up to 10% Load, all the fuel is burned just in the EV (as in simple cycle)
IGV_min over 10% Load The temperatures at SEV inlet are enough to allow fuel auto-ignition in SEV
OPC
16
University of Genoa
HRSG materials limits the maximum TOT (TOT) ≤ 650 °C
MAX TEMPERAT. HRSGReducing the compressor inlet mass flow rate via IGV,also pressure ratio β is reduced. If the controls isdesigned to mantain a fixed TIT (Performance /Environmental Choice), it results in highertemperature at turbine outlet.
= > = ; TOT=TIT*(1/ )^(k-1)/k
Even if it will be possible to reduce furthercompressor mass flow rate without instabilityissues (stall and surge), the HRSG limit ontemperature will be reached.
GT Control in CCPP: Effects over HRSG
Which are the other limit to the TIT variation ?
17
University of Genoa
The pollutant emission if a gas fired Turbine and relevant to the local environment are :
Nitrogen Oxide, NOx, a mix of NO ed NO2which create acid rain and smog int heatmosphere; Are created by high temperaturecombustion, so related to Base Load.
Carbon monoxide (strongly correlated also toUnburned HydroCarbons, UHC), is caused bythe not complete combustion of the NaturalGas. Main cause are low temperature and lowresidence time in the combustion chamber, it ismainly related to Low Load.
TG Controls: effect on emissions
The residence time usually does not change much on part-load because the normalized flow approximately remains constant with a variable load
18
University of GenoaFlame Type
Emission Limit at Full Load:Premix Flame (NOx reduction)
Premix Lean Flame Instability (Humming)
Increasing Premix
Frequency of humming close to structuralfrequency (phisical Acceleration)
Reducing NOx
Increase CC instability
Limit to the maximum Energy to the Combustion Chamber
19
University of Genoa
Ansaldo Solution - AE94.3A2 : burners VeLoNOxTM (Very Low NOx)
24 Burners, each burner is divided into 2 burners stage:- axial (rich combustion)- diagonal (lean combustion)
• Up to 60% of GT speed the combustion ispartly Premixed and the mix is fed by theaxial burner while trough the diagonal onejust air is fed;
• From FSNL both burners are fed withpremixed air and fuel with different ratio asfunction of the load
• The MEL is limited by CO @40% of load
TG Control: Burner design -1
Load
Ramp
20
University of Genoa
PILOTRich, Higher temperatures, stability
PREMIXLean, Lower Temperature, less NoxProduction
Ansaldo Solution - V94.3A2 : bruciatori VeLoNOx (Very Low NOx)
TG Control: Burner design -1
Annular Chamber
21
University of Genoa
General Electric solution - 9FA+e: Bruciatori DLN 2.6+
18 burners, each burner is divided into 6 burner stages:• The 5 external burner stages can manage both diffusion and premix combustion• The central burner stage is fed just by premixed fuel (PM1)
• FSNL: central burner in premix while the external burners stage are in diffusion(high NOx).
• 20 % load 3 external burners switch to premix mode,• 30 % load all in premix mode (MEL).
DLN 2.6+ system, with the IBH system allows toreach a very low TG MEL (70 MW - 26% )
NOx < 30 mg/Nm3CO < 30 mg/Nm3
TG Control: Burner design -2
Load Transition Piece
Fuel nozzle
Forward can
22
University of Genoa
Alstom solution : EV + SEVThe EV burner, is a two stages lancecombustor (similar to the Siemens/Ansaldo one).The combustion system has morethan 2 free variables
TG Control: Burner design -3
SEV burner is made by alance which introduce fuel inan apt designed Combustionzone where flue gas from HPturbine flows. Thecombustion is initiated bythe autoignition of the fuel
23
University of Genoa
Acoustic instabilitiesIn lean premixed combustion systems, flows are designed to be turbulent to enhance the mixing of fuel and air. Theturbulence causes a fluctuating heat release resulting in acoustic waves travelling through the combustion chamber, arereflected at the boundaries, and travel back to the burner. There they tend to influence the flow field and close a thermo-acoustic feedback cycle, allowing combustion instabilities to develop.
In a lean premixed combustion chamber, there are always someacoustic instabilities present.These instabilities are not dangerous during normal operation.They become dangerous when the amplitude rises too much orwhen a dangerous frequency arises in the spectrum (structuralresonance)
Combustion Hummig and Acceleration Monitoring / Analysis => TG Derating or Trip
24
University of Genoa
Acoustic instabilities
25
Passive Solutions: - Humming Frequencyes <> Combustion
Chamber Frequencyes- Design for low frequency Vortex reduction- break the symmetry (e.g. CBO)
Active Solutions: to damp combustion oscillationsevery burner was fitted with a direct drive valve feed-back controlled by a pressure measurements J. Hermann, A. Orthmann, Combustion Dynamics: Application
of Active Instability Control to Heavy Duty Gas Turbines
University of GenoaPollutant Control - NOxPrimary measures: For new gas turbines, dry low NOX premix burners (DLN) are BAT. For existing gas turbines, water andsteam injection (1.7 Meuro @140MWth) or conversion to the DLN technique is BAT (2 Meuro @140MWth).
DLN burner
Secondary measures: For most gas turbines and gas engines,Selective Catalitic Reactor, SCR is also considered to be BAT.Retrofitting of an SCR system to a CCGT is technically feasiblebut is not economically justified for existing plants. This isbecause the required space in the HRSG was not foreseen inthe project and is, therefore, not available. The capital costsof an SCR for gas turbines or internal combustion engines arein the range of EUR 10 to 50/kW (based on electrical output)
26
University of Genoa
CO is a pollutant which is created only a part load. The CO limits the turndown capability of a gas based Power Plant =>Minimum Environmental Load. This aspect become crucial nowadays as a flexibility quality.
Primary measures: reduction in CO formation are achieved by Combustion Optimization (good design of the combustionequipment, optimisation of the temperature (e.g. efficient mixing of the fuel and combustion air) and residence time in thecombustion zone, and/or use of an advanced control system. just a cold spot can quench the reaction!
Calculated reaction time to achieve a CO concentration of 10ppm in a commercial gas turbine exhaust.
Secondary measures: To reduce the CO emissions, the application ofoxidation catalysts is BAT with the associated emission levels for naturalgas firing mentioned
Pollutant Control - CO
27
University of Genoa
POWER HR
TambACTCC
ISOCC CfPPP /
TambACTCC
ISOCC CfCSCSCS
TambCfCSTambCfP
Boundary Conditions: Ambient
28
The main seasonal effect over GT maximum power production isrelated to the ambient temperature.
During summer, the Capacity of a Combined Cycle can drop of more than 10%
University of Genoa
Boundary Conditions: Gas quality
29
For the gas turbine operator, the most likely issues associated with fuel composition variation areassociated with the combustion system in the gas turbine and include: high levels of pollutant emissions, especially oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide component life and integrity issues due to factors such as flame flashback and unstable combustion operability issues such as ignition problems and flame failure
[4] Brown M., Bryant N., Haynes D., Study on LNG Quality Issues, a study for the European Commission –JRC Institute for Energy prepared by Advantica Ltd., Loughborough, The UK, April 2008
Fundamental properties of the fueland air/fuel mixture are: Heat content Flame speed Autoignition temperature Autoignition delay time Flammability limits Stoichiometric flame temperature
D J Abbott , J P Bowers*, and S R James, THE IMPACT OF NATURAL GAS COMPOSITION VARIATIONS ON THE OPERATION OF GAS TURBINES FOR POWER GENERATION
Typically units are tuned to a specific heating value and there is a 5% tolerance on this design value. However, the rate of change is not allowed to exceed 0.1%/s.
University of Genoa
Boundary Conditions: Gas quality
30Riccius, Smith, Guthe, Flohr, THE GT24/26 COMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY AND HIGH HYDROCARBON (“C2+”) FUELS, GT2005-68799
higher hydrocarbons are summarized as “C2+”, which is the sum of all molefractions of hydrocarbons with more than one C-atom. At the same timetodays gas supplies may carry a large and varying content of inert gases,mainly CO2 and some N2
The higher hydrocarbons typically increase the reactivity of the fuel-air mixture which lead to increased flammability limits (often advantageous) and higher flame propagation speed cases lead to flame flashback and combustor hardware damage.
University of GenoaCCPP – Performance evolution (design)
Why 50 Hz Machine produces approx. 40% more power than the 60 Hz ones equipped with the same technology?
Rotational force depend on squared rotational speed => 3600^2/3000^2=1.4460 Hz machine size must be ca 40% smaller than the 50 Hz
31
University of GenoaCCPP – Performance evolution
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015
LHV
Effic
ienc
y [%
]
I - CCPP [18] UK - CCPP [19] UK+IE - NGPP [20]
D - NGPP [20] FR - NGPP [20] DK+FI+SE -NGPP [20]
[18]AEEGSI, Relazione 24 Giugno 2016, 339/2016/l/efr; http://www.autorita.energia.it/it/docs/16/339-16.htm
[19]Departement of Energy & Climate Change, DIGEST OF UNITED KINGDOM ENERGY STATISTICS 2015
[20]Ecofys, International comparison of fossil power efficiency and CO2 intensity - Update 2014 Final Report
These operating efficiencies are yearly averages and cover the full range of different situations that may affect efficiency, e.g. different load modes and factors, different cooling systems, different ages or climatic conditions
LCP BREF, DRAFT 06 2016
32
University of GenoaBoundary Conditions:Electrical Market
33
Power market evolution is heavily impacting thermal generation: load factor reduction, number of start up increase, with a direct effect on the profitability of these Assets, often leading to mothballing or closure of these plants. Some Gas Assets will be able to survive via more flexibility : in terms of minimum load, ramp rates, start up time… which can lead to ancillary services revenues. Gas units needed for the security of the system will require the introduction of a sustainable capacity remuneration mechanism.
Wim BroosSVP Thermal Fleet Management
University of Genoa380 MW CCPP: Operating Data
121115
91
152
168
5 97
3
3 65
1
2 82
7
1 56
2
1 51
1
0
1 000
2 000
3 000
4 000
5 000
6 000
7 000
8 000
9 000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Operating hours [h]
Star
t-up
[n°]
Flexibility operation data 2009 - 2013Start up [n°] Operating hours [h] Poly. (Operating hours [h])
34
University of Genoa
UCTE Handbook: “Ancillary services” are all services which support elementary functions of electric power system and they are supplied by subjects dealing of production, control and transmission of electric power.
Ancillary Services are: • frequency control;
• reactive power and voltage control;
Part of those services are mandatory, other are offered on a special market (Mercato dei Servizi di Dispacciamento, MSD), where Active power is «payd as bid», on the base of the TSO (Transmission System Operator) indications.
Ancillary Services – MSD
35
University of Genoa
Flexibility: Solution for CCPP
36
University of GenoaReduce Minimum Environmental Load: To compete on the electricity market an high turn down capability is mandatory (T.D. < 40% B.L.),
the limit is related to Gas Turbine to maintain a minimum fuel/air ratio avoiding CO production.The Minimum Environmental Load, for the gas turbine is tipically located close to the IGV full closed position,minimum air mass flow rate.
GT solutions to reduce the air taking part to combustion:• IGV extra closure• Compressor recirculation (Inlet bleed heating – anti icing)• Reduction of compressor inlet density (inlet heating)• Optimized burner design (staged combustion)• Combustion chamber by-pass (through Blow-off / cooling air valves)
other solutions:• CO Catalyst
37
University of Genoa
IGV Extra Closure
Through the IGV extra closure it’s possible to reduce the minimum air mass flow rate to the combustionchamber resulting in higher combustion temperatures at lower load, avoiding CO formation.
Minimizing the MEL: IGV position
Power reduction Impact on Efficiency
-11% - 2.5%
TETC = TOTCO CO
before
after
38
University of GenoaMinimizing the MEL: By-passing Burner
An optimization of the minimum load performance can be obtained by reducing the mass flow rate entering the combustion chamber through:- Regulating Blow-off valves: discharging mass flow directly to the HRSG diffusor (MEL -12%)- Regulating Cooling valves: increasing the air mass flow rate fed to cool the 2° and 3° vanes (MEL -4%)
Blow-off Valves
Cooling Valves
39
University of Genoa
GE solution: IBH Valves, Inlet Bleed Heating
A mass flow rate up to 5% of the air is recirculated to thecompressor inlet to:
• Avoid Ice formation when the inlet temperature is very low• Control the surge margin• Extend premix combustion to lower load
Low MEL: Recirculating compressor
Power reduction Impact on Efficiency
-22% -10%
40
University of Genoa
The Inlet Bleed Heating (IBH) reduce the mass flow rate of the air entering the combustionchamber thanks to:
- direct effect, the spilled mass flow rate (-5%)- indirect effect, the decrease of the air density at compressor inlet (-7%) .
Hp: Turbine Inlet Temperature constant (air/fuel ratio constant)
Compressor discharge mass flow recirculationLow MEL: Recirculating compressor
IBH CLOSED IBH OPEN (5% recirculated mass flow)
Air to the compressor % 100% 93% (+20°C CIT)
Compression Power MW 120 117
Flows to the burners % 100% 88%
Espansion Power MW 240 211
GT Net Power MW 120 94 (-22%)
GT Fuel Power % 100% 85% (+20°C CDT)
GT efficiency % 28 % 25 % (-10%)
41
University of Genoa
Inlet Heating:MEL reduction and part load efficiency
An optimization of the part load performance can be obtained increasing the inlet temperature by the means ofan heat exchanger. The effect is the reduction of the off-design condition (higher efficiency) during part load,while maintaining the same power production. Moreover this solution help to decrease the MEL.
This upgrade requires the installation of and air water Heat exchanger in the filter house resulting in anaddictional pressure drops at GT inlet
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Impa
ct o
n ef
ficie
ncy
[%]
Load / Base Load ISO20°C (+5°C) 25°C (+10°C) 30°C(+15°C) 35°C (+20°C)
GT inlet temperature
42
University of Genoa
Shutting Down SEV Alstom Based –Combined Cycle can reach a VeryLow Load (20% ca), no reheat Cycle
TG Control: Burner design
43
Combustors are gradually shut-down, which can lead to not uniform discharge temperature distribution
University of GenoaMinimizing the MEL: CO catalyst Flue gas post processing:A grid composed by platinum to be introduced in HRSG, oxidizes CO to CO2 with an efficiency higher than 95%
The CO catalyst allows the reduction of the MEL of 25% withoutadditional impact over the GT off-design
there are still knowledge gaps in how to apply CO catalyst in practice,how to assess and follow up their performances and what are theCAPEX and OPEX versus the flexibility gains.
44
University of Genoa
Case Study: flexibility in the electrical market: start up cost Vs production revenues
Typical Price Profile of the Day Ahead Italian market
Daily Cycling is mandatory
45
University of Genoa
Case Study: flexibility in the electrical market: start up cost vs production revenues (Base Load)
CCPP #1 CCPP #2 CCPP #3Gas cost during Start up euro 12000 8000 6500
Energy produced during start-up MWh 50 40 30Power Base Load MW 385 385 385
eta base load % 56 56 56Specific cost Base Load euro/MWh 59.1 59.1 59.1
CCPP#3: 2 start-up / day
46
University of Genoa
Case Study: flexibility in the electrical market: start up cost vs production revenues (Base Load)
CCPP #3 CCPP #3 MEL CCPP #3 PmaxGas cost during Start up euro 6500 6500 6500
Energy produced during start-up MWh 30 30 30Power Base Load MW 385 385 420
MEL MW 175 140 175
47
University of Genoa
4. Combined Cycle Management
48
Combined Cycle Power Plant management have to take intoaccount: the market price of the electricity the variability of the fuel cost, the cost of start-up maneuver the cost of maintenance
In particular nowadays, in Europe: More Renewables drives the need for CCPP flexibility CCPP’s have to change load faster Daily start-up and even double daily start-ups Faster Start -up times Required
Main interest on:- Reduction of time and costs
of the plant start-up- Evaluation of the cycling
impact (maintenance costs)- Extended long term
monitoring condition
University of Genoa
CCPP start-up
Start up maneuvers affects thick components which operates at high temperature, due to thermo-mechanic fatigue, mainly:- Steam Turbine Rotor - High Pressure Drum
The are systems which cap the run up velocity to avoid exceeding the “permissible” thermal stress:- Rotor Stress Evaluator - Boiler Stress Evaluator
49
University of Genoa
Start-up Efficiency Impact
50
Taking into account the start-up, the efficiency drops from 54.7 to 53.6
• The primary energy burnt during anaverage start-up is ca 1900000 MJ(48300 Sm3 di gas) with an electricalproduction of 185 MWh
• This electrical production has quite noimpact with respect to economical gain
• During a typical daily 15 h Loadprofile, 4775 MWh are produced withan average gas consumption of31.500.000 MJ. CSN = 6583 kJ/KWh(eta=54.7)
• Taking into account the start-up theCSN rise up to 6714 kJ/kWh (eta=53.6)
University of GenoaCombined Cycle Start-up Potential Saving
51
Potential to save time by: 1.Decrease/cancel HRSG purging time 2.Increase HRSG pressurization ramp rate 3.Anticipating steam turbine start-up 4.Increasing steam turbine ramp up rate5.GT load strategy: increase load as quick as possible to reach quicker Pmin (context of tertiary reserve) Potential to save fuel by: 1.Keeping installation as hot as possible during shutdown 2.Decreasing/cancelling HRSG purging time 3.Increasing HRSG pressurization ramp rate 4.Anticipating steam turbine start-up 5.Increasing steam turbine start-up ramp up rate 6.GT load st-up strategy: wait for steam turbine start-up before to increase the GT load
1) HRSG Purge (Blow off open –Electrical Drive)2) Ligth on3) GT speed Ramp (Blow off open – Mixed Gas/Electrical Drive)4) Syncronization (Blow-off Closed – Gas Drive)5) GT Load Ramp
1 2
FSNL
3
4
5
University of Genoa
Purge Time Reduction
52
Two Standards Apply:- API 616 Gas Turbines for the Petroleum, Chemical, and Gas Industry Services
Purge 3 - 5 the volume of the exhaust system (generic)- NFPA 85 (National Fire Protection Association) Boiler and Combustion Systems Hazards Code
(Specific for the HRSG) Purge prior to the lightoff of the combustion turbine shall be accomplished by atleast five volume changes and for a duration of not less than 5 minutes.This volume shall be calculated based on the following:(1) The combustion turbine operating at full load with no supplementary HRSG firing(2) The volume from the combustion turbine inlet to the portion of the HRSG or other combustion turbine exhaust systems where the combustion turbine exhaust gas temperature is reduced to at least 56°C (100°F) below the lowest autoignition temperature of the fuel(s) for which the system has been designed
In no case shall the volume in 8.8.4.2.1.2(2) be less than the volume of the HRSG enclosure between the combustion turbine outlet and the outlet of the first evaporator section in the HRSG.
API 616 NFPA85HRSG + Camino HRSG + Camino Fino a EVA AP
Purge Volume m3 8400 8400 3280portata d'aria m3/s 41.5 41.5 41.5n. ricambio volumi # 3 5 5tempo PURGE min 10.1 16.9 6.6
Purge Credit isanother HW SW option to skippurge time
University of GenoaSt-Up: FSNL Behaviour
53
Gruppo TG1 (MW) TG2 (MW) TV (MW) CCGT (MW)GE in 1+1 70 - 72 142GE in 2+1 70 70 140 280AEN in 1+1 146 - 70 216AEN in 2+1 146 146 150 442
Minimo TecnicoGradiente di
Carico TG (MW/min)
Tempo per il massimo
carico (min)
AEN 6.5 -13 40 - 20
GE 20 13
University of GenoaSt-Up: 2+1 AEN/Siemens (Hot Pressurized)HRSG PURGING
FLAME ON TG1
FLAME ON TG2
Minimo tecnico
Full load
Total Time= 65 minutes
54
University of GenoaSt-Up: 2+1 GE (Warm)HRSG PURGING FLAME ON
Minimo tecnico
Tempo complessivo= 85 minuti
55
University of GenoaGT behaviour impact over Start-up Costs
exhaust temperature @ partial load Higher exhaust temperature at FSNL/lower load HRSG pressurization with lower gas consumptionspeed up and load up gradients reduce start up time and cost
Start up cost of 2 differentUnits:
• Unit 1 gas turbine TETC480°C @FSNL
• Unit 2 gas turbine TETC480°C@80MW 0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
0 20 40 60 80St
art-
up C
ost [
euro
]
Electricity price [euro/MWh]
UNIT 1
UNIT 2
56
University of GenoaGT Control: IGV e m_fuel – OPFLex VLP
Allows independent control of load and exhaust temperature withinthe gas turbine boundaries … true GT flexibility product• Simple interfaces for integrating into existing plant operation• Requires OpFlex AutoTune to manage combustor operability
57
Temperature matching with the bottoming Cycle Stand Still Temperature
Dr. Artur Ulbrich, Andy Jones, Christian Schäferkordt, Stuart Simpson, Increasingcompetitiveness of CCGT plants in a dynamic market: An owner´s approach
University of Genoa
58
GT Control: IGV e m_fuel – OPFLex VLP
Dr. Artur Ulbrich, Andy Jones, Christian Schäferkordt, Stuart Simpson, Increasingcompetitiveness of CCGT plants in a dynamic market: An owner´s approach
University of Genoa
59
GT Control: IGV e m_fuel – OPFLex VLP
Dr. Artur Ulbrich, Andy Jones, Christian Schäferkordt, Stuart Simpson, Increasingcompetitiveness of CCGT plants in a dynamic market: An owner´s approach
University of Genoa
Pressurization gradient for Drum-type HRSG 6/8 °C of Tsat/min, to be monitored with BSE (Boiler
Stress Evaluator)
Length of main steam piping Important design impact – length between bypass
and ST
Drains design Drains review to reduce the main steam piping
warming time
St-Up: Bottoming Cycle Limitations
Once trough Benson Boiler, is an option for start up not constrained by the Drum thickness
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
HP
DRU
M P
ress
ure
[bar
]
minutes
BSE compliant Pressure Ramps
P Drum HP ini 0 bar P Drum HP ini 6 barP Drum HP ini 12 bar P Drum HP ini 20 bar
Minimum HP ST pressure
University of GenoaReduce cost of Start-up: ST characteristicSpeed up available @ lower pressure Steam Turbine with direct connection from the HP/IP body to condenser during start up
allow a wide range of speed up pressure (anti-Ventilation Valve).Lower weight of the rotor Impulse design steam turbine allows faster load up due to lower rotor weight and
dimension.
61
University of Genoa
Start up are classified on the base of the initial conditions of the bottoming Cycle when the start up maneuver is initiated:• Steam Turbine Metal Temperature ( Rotor centre or first vane);• High Pressure Drum Pressure
Start –Up Type Stand Still (h) HP DrumPressure (bar)
T RotorCentre(°C)
Gradiente giri TV(rpm/min)
Full Speed time (min)
Cold t>64 p<2 < 150 75 40
Warm 16<t<64 p<12 150 < T < 370 150 20
Hot t<16 p<12 T > 370 300 10
Hot pressurized t<16 p>12 T > 370 300 10
Some times to avoid cold start up conditions (below theductile to brittle transition temperature) auxiliary steam isused to mantain the rotor in warm conditions
62
To mantain HRSG temperature, the flue gas stack damper isclose after shut down.
GT flue Gs Temperature
Main Steam Steam Temperature
ST Metal Temperature
Temperature Mismatch < 50 K (stress reduction)
St-Up: Bottoming Cycle Initial Conditions
University of Genoa
63
St-Up: Bottoming Cycle Initial Conditions
University of GenoaRotor Stress Evaluator (RSE)
The Rotor Stress Evaluator (RSE) is the system which limits the gradient of ST and GT load in order to reduce the fatigue on the components
1. Basing on temperature measurement representative of the rotor surface (Starting Probe), Temperature distribution is calculated
2. If Relative Comparative stress exceed a threshold, a load reduction is triggered for the GT.
-RSE give no information about start up impact on the residual steam turbine life (Damage Calculation),
-the definition of “Permissible” is not clear
64
University of GenoaStress Evaluation and Low Cycle Fatigue
The stresses in the rotor are produced by:- temperature gradients in the material (Thermal
Stress),- the centrifugal force, - the pressure.
Thermal Stress
the main contributor: about the 95% of the overall stress during start up transient
66
University of GenoaWarm Start-up (T_initial =345°C )
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000
100
200
300
400
500
600
POW
ER [M
W]
TIME [min]
TEM
PERA
TURE
[°C]
Surface Temperature Mean Temperature Center TemperatureTurbogas Power Steam Turbine Power
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
100
TIME [min]
STR
ESS
[M
Pa]
Radial StressCircumferential StressAxial Stress
66
University of Genoa
Start Up Downtime
[ h ]
Initial Rotor
Temperature
[°C ]
Mean Gradient
[°C/h ]
Temperature
Variation
[°C ]
Maximum
Number of
Cycles
Specific Life
Consumption
[%]
Warm 40 345 255 170 3300 0.03
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000
100
200
300
400
TIME [min]
ST
RE
SS
[M
Pa]
SurfaceCenter
Warm Start-up (T_initial =345°C )
- During the shut down thermal stress not exceed 40 Mpa- Considering as fatiguing cycle the stresses caused by start up and shut down, a fully-reversed loading condition is not
got. Therefore it is possible to consider a zero-max-zero profile loading condition and neglect shut down impact over LCF
67
University of GenoaCLE Curves – HP Rotor
such curves allows to:
knowing in advance the reduction ofturbine's life connected to a givenmaneuver or gradient of temperaturechangemaking choices on the reduction of
warm up and load times, and then onthe increase of temperature gradientsthat the rotor will have to endurechoosing whether to sacrifice some of
the useful life of the rotor to gaingreater operating flexibility
CLE= f(total range of Temp [°C]; Temp gradient [°C/h])
68
University of GenoaCurve CLE – HP Rotor
HOT6 h SS
Ti = 450 °CN > 100000
HOT18 h SS
Ti = 394 °CN = 14000
WARM40 h SS
Ti = 345 °CN = 3300
COLD144 h SS
Ti = 150 °CN = 600
COLD240 h SSTi = 90 °CN = 600
69
University of GenoaST Yearly Life Consumption EstimationBasing on operating conditione the average yearly start-up related life consumptionwas evaluated
Miner-Robinson rule was use to combine LCF Life Expenditure and creep effect due to high temperature normal operation (creep-rupture life 300,000 h ).
low cycle fatigue a yearly consumption 5.05% (as in table 4)Creep yearly Life Consumption 1% (3000 Operating Hours /Year)Total Yearly Life Consumption 6.05%
17 years until defects nucleation
70
University of Genoa
6h/d 10h/d
14h/d
24h 2/7
24h 5/7 Weekly
MontlhyQuarterly
TGATGB
TGC
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
STAR
TS
EQUIVALENT OPERATIVE HOURSProfili di carico Cycling Limit Limiti per la manutenzione
Maintenance Cost in CCPP
71
The LTSA, Long Term Service Agreement, offers to the power plant owner a series of planned maintenance outages. Interval between outages is defined on the base of the operating duty of the machine (load profile)
FH/avv_lim=31.7
Usually Equivalent Operative Hours,EOH , are use to taking intoaccount the impact of start-up (1 start- up = 10 Fired Hours) and this was used to evaluate maintenance costs over the MaintenceInterval (e.g. 25000 EOH) (hourly cost approach) (ca 180eur/h).
Fired Hours
Star
ts
Nowadays the maintence limit is reached on the maximum number of starts, so if the machine is operatedfor less than 31.7 hours per start-up the maintence costrelated increases (tipically up to 6000 eur )
University of GenoaMajor Factors Influencing GT Maintenance
72
Gas Turbine Hot Part, and in particular Blades andVanes, as function of operative conditions, areaffected by several wear mechanisms.
Operational ProfileAverage Fired
Hours (h)Critical Damaga
Mechanism Fired Hours to end life
Cicle to end life
Fatica CreepOss.
CiclicaQuarterly 2160 Oss Ciclica 23500 129 62 11Monthly 720 Oss Ciclica 23500 163 183 30Weekly 92 Fatica e Oss Ciclica 23500 255 1462 261Daily 10 Fatica 4100 414 13500 2400
Daily operational profile reduce the number of fired hours for maintenance interval (from 23500 to 4100) and so the time for Power Production => Maintenance Cost per hours increase of a factor 5.7
C. Rinaldi, V. Bicego, P.P Colombo, Rapporto CESI, Aprile 2004
Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine Operating and Maintenance Considerations GER-3620M (02/15)
University of GenoaMaintenance Interval
73
Different methodology to take into account the impact of Operational lifeto evaluate the Maintenance Interval :• Opzione A: Numbers of start-up and fired hours (FH) are not correlated,each one has its own threshold which triggers the Maintenance, (GeneralElectric approach);• Opzione B: Each start up cycle –or fast transient event- is counted witha number of Equivalent Operative Hours (EOH), the sum of the total EOHdepends liearly from both FH and start up numbers; (Ansaldo, Siemens,Alstom approach)• Opzione C: A more complex correlation is used (No O&M adopted it)
What are Operative Equivalent Hours (EOH)?Cyclic thermal stress due to start up and fast transient are taken into account by and equivalent amount ofEquivalent Operative Hours (=> EOH)Under normal condition 1 Fired Hours is equivalent to 1 EOH.This value is modified if aggresive fuel, higher flame temperature than standard is used.
B method will be used for following consoderationsconsiderting each start up maneuverequal to 10 EOH and each FH queal to 1 EOH. A limit to a maximum 600 start ups is added
University of GenoaEx: Maintenance Costs
74
Outages Interval [EOH]
Minor 4000
HGPI 25000
Major 50000
Running Inspection Standby Inspection Scheduled Maintenance
Maintenance Costs €
HGPI Costs 4500000
HGPI Interval 250000 EOH
EOH / Start Up 10 EOH
Hourly Maintenance Cost (eur/EOH) 180
Expected cost/St-up 1800
Numbers of start up maintenance Thrshld 6000
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000N
um. O
f Sta
rt-u
pFH
Maintenance Thresholds
University of Genoa
6h/d 10h/d
14h/d
24h 2/7 24h 5/7 Weekly
MonthlyQuarterly
TGATGB
TGC
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
Yearly Operational Profile
Profili di carico Cycling Limit Limiti per la manutenzione
Comparison of Operational Profiles
75
Operational Profiles Yearly operation Hours Yearly start-up6h/d 2106 35010h/d 3538 35314h/d 4981 355
24h 2/7 2309 4824h 5/7 6051 50
Weekly 8551 50Monthly 8541 11Quarterly 8539 3
OperationalProfiles
Maintenance IntervalFH/avv EOH / MI FH / MI
6 h/d 6 9600 360010 h/d 10 12000 600014 h/d 14 14400 8400
24 h 2/7 48 25000 2069024 h 5/7 120 25000 23077
Weekly 168 25000 23596Monthly 730 25000 24662Quarterly 2182 25000 24886
• 11,44 h for TGA;• 10.29 h for TGB;• 9.4 h for TGC.
average FH / avv:
FH/avv_lim=31.7
University of Genoa
TG: compressor efficiency
Nowadays Full load operation covers just a fraction of a CCPP life (Load Factor around 60%)To increase the range of the monitoring resultsbase lines are now created taking into account not just the full load conditions
Test
Train
η =ℎ _ − ℎ
ℎ − ℎℎ = ,
5. Flexible Monitoring of CCPP
An Hybrid, knowledge based and Data Driven model are the used to create
reference base line
The first rule of monitoring is: «make them comparable»
Several filter strategies are usuallyadopted: Steady state, full load, active auxiliaries
Such approach is applied to allthose components which
76
University of GenoaFLEXIBILITY – Process Control
77
University of GenoaOn line Performance Monitoring
78
University of Genoa
Final Summary
1. Large Size Heavy Duty Gas Turbine
2. HDGT Control Systems:- Control Loops and typical target- Methods for Minimum Environmental Load reduction
3. Combined Cycle Management- Start-up of the Combined Cycle
4. Maintenance cost and the Impact of Flexibilization
5. Monitoring and Diagnosis of CCPP- ST Example
79