2017-18 quarter 4 academic progress report presentation to

59
2017-18 QUARTER 4 ACADEMIC PROGRESS REPORT PRESENTATION TO THE BOE SEPTEMBER 19, 2018 SCHENECTADY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Upload: others

Post on 11-Nov-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

2017-18 QUARTER 4

ACADEMIC PROGRESS REPORT

PRESENTATION TO THE BOE

SEPTEMBER 19, 2018

SCHENECTADY CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT

2

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

Summary of Data: Slide:

Fluency & Reading Levels 4

ELA Interim & New York State ELA Assessments 8

Math Interim & New York State Math Assessments 12

Additional New York State Assessments 16

Middle & High School-Level Advanced Courses 22

Report Card Achievement Data 26

June & August Grad Rates 34

Summer School Participation 37

Office of Curriculum & Instruction Areas of Priority 39

Behavior Data 42

Attendance Data 49

Office of Pupil Personnel Services 54

3

SYMBOLS USED IN TODAY’S PRESENTATION

MOVING

IN THE RIGHT

DIRECTION

PROCEEDING

WITH

CAUTION

PRIORITY AREA!

NEEDS

ATTENTION

4

End-of-Year

Fluency & Reading Levels

44

60

83

98

118

41

62

82

99

116

59

78

100

114

133

60

78

96

113

130

81

95

114

129

146

81

94

111

128

149

0

30

60

90

120

150

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade

Word

s R

ead

Corr

ect

per

Min

ute

Average Words Read Correct (WRC) per Minute by Grade Level

2016-17 to 2017-18 Comparison

2016-17 Sept

2017-18 Sept

2016-17 Nov

2017-18 Nov

2016-17 June

2017-18 June

SP

5

• WRC is a measure of fluency

• One measure used to

monitor student progress

• Any increases or decreases

between years were negligible

Fall 2016-17 to Fall 2017-18

Winter 2016-17 to Winter 2017-18

Spring 2016-17 to Spring 2017-18

Grade Level 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6

Hamilton 10

Howe 8

Keane 9

Lincoln 8

ML King 8

Paige 7

PV 4

VC 4

Woodlawn 6

Yates 6

Zoller 7

CPMS (6)

MPMS (6)

OMS (6)

2016-17 to 2017-18 Average Words Read Correct

Year to Year Comparison, Grades 2- 6, by Building

*based on AIMS Web Oral Reading

SP

6

7

KM

Average Instructional Reading Level* (IRL), by Building, Grades 7-8, Year-to-Year Comparison*based on STAR Reading criterion referenced measures

5.3

1

4.9

0

5.5

7

5.5

7

4.9

2

5.0

4

5.4

8

5.0

6

5.7

9

5.9

1

5.1

1

5.6

6

5.9

1

5.5

1

6.3

0

5.9

8

5.6

3

6.1

4

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

Central Park MS Mont Pleasant MS Oneida MS

Ave

rage

Inst

ruct

ional

Read

ing

Leve

l

2016-17 Sept 2017-18 Sept 2016-17 Feb 2017-18 Feb 2016-17 June 2017-18 June

Quarter 4 CPMS MPMS OMS

Total Tested 404 388 405

Participation 83% 83% 94%

• IRL is an estimate of the grade-level of appropriate texts that

can be used for effective instruction

• IRL Reliability ±1 Grade Level

• One measure used to monitor student progress

• Any increases or decreases between years were negligible

8

End-of-Year

ELA Interim &

NYS Assessment Data

4.6

9%

14.1

1%

6.1

0%

2.9

4%

2.8

7%

16.7

3%

5.5

6%

6.9

9%

17.0

3%

5.7

0%

11.6

8%

5.4

7%

12.7

9%

10.9

5%

4.6

3%

2.4

9%

6.9

0%

2.3

4%

7.2

0%

26.3

6%

6.7

2%

12.0

9%

16.3

5%

17.5

0%

12.5

0%

8.7

5%

7.5

2%

15.6

6%

6.4

9%

9.3

9%

18.5

8%

7.4

1%

32.4

6%

9.5

9%

14.6

7%

15.8

2%

8.9

7%

8.6

8%

12.1

5%

18.8

5%

12.6

1%

35.7

5%

12.3

0%

32.1

3%

22.00%

35.00%

19.00%

11.00% 13.00%

22.00%

13.00%

21.00%

31.00%

21.00%

28.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

HAM HOWE KEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VAN WDLN YATE ZOL

Ave

rage

Build

ing

Pro

fici

ency

2016-17 to 2017-18 ELA Interim (2-5) and NYS Exam Average Proficiency Projection (3-5)

Oct 16-17 Oct 17-18 Feb 16-17 Feb 17-18 State 16-17 State 17-18

9

Ham How Kean Linc MLK Paig PV Van Wdl Yate Zol

Total Tested (Feb Interim) 271 225 196 223 334 321 244 238 221 244 277

Participation (Feb Interim) 92% 95% 89% 95% 87% 93% 84% 93% 90% 89% 97%KM

• NYS ELA Proficiency 2016-17

• Interim Proficiency 2017-18

• Participation = Feb Interim

• NYS ELA Proficiency 2017-18

“Embargoed”

10

CP MP OMS

Total Tested (Feb Interim) 623 582 644

Participation (Feb Interim) 90% 84% 93%KM

18.7

5%

16.9

6%

15.0

8%

25.6

2%

11.1

3%

17.5

1%

22.8

3%

16.2

7%

24.8

3%

26.8

1%

22.1

6%

23.4

5%

20.00%

10.00%

19.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

CPMS MPMS ONMS

Ave

rage

Perc

ent

Pro

fici

ency

2016-17 to 2017-18 ELA Interim (6-8) and NYS Exam Average Proficiency Projection (6-8)

Oct 16-17 Oct 17-18 Feb 16-17 Feb 17-18 State 16-17 State 17-18

• NYS ELA Proficiency 2016-17

• Interim Proficiency 2017-18

• Participation = Feb Interim

• NYS ELA Proficiency 2017-18

“Embargoed”

11

Total

Tested

All Black Hispanic Asian White SWD SES Non-SES ELL

2016-17 538 179 62 142 157 99 412 141 21

2017-18 606 224 69 147 157 94 493 113 25

71.5

6%

62.5

7%

66.1

3%

73.9

4%

78.3

4%

34.3

4%

68.2

0%

78.0

1%

28.5

7%

56.2

7%

48.0

5%

56.3

4%

57.8

2%

64.6

3%

28.7

0%

53.4

0%

68.0

3%

24.0

0%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

All Black Hispanic Asian White SWD SES Non-SES ELL

Perc

ent

Pro

fici

ent

Sub-groups

2016-17 2017-18KM

ELA Common Core Regents Assessment (June Administrations Only)

2016-17 to 2017-18 Comparison

• Designed to measure students’

achievement of the Grade

11-12 Band CCLS for ELA

• Overall decrease in proficiency

• Data triangulated and

pinpointed to students and

standards

12

End-of-Year

Math Interim &

NYS Assessment Data

13

Interim Tested/Participation Ham How Kean Linc MLK Paig PV Van Wdl Yate Zol

Total Tested (Mar Interim) 201 165 161 160 253 264 200 189 165 180 180

Participation (Mar Interim) 94% 93% 93% 93% 87% 97% 94% 95% 90% 89% 91%JD

9.5

6%

17.1

4%

15.1

3%

9.8

2%

8.8

9%

25.8

8%

8.2

6%

7.6

9%

31.3

0%

12.1

2%

17.0

4%

19.6

4%

18.1

8%

11.3

2%

11.0

4%

9.0

2%

14.5

1%

7.5

8%

11.0

5%

30.3

0%

9.6

6%

38.3

8%

13.7

9%

23.6

4%

21.9

3%

10.9

1%

14.9

2%

34.3

6%

8.6

0%

9.6

0%

40.3

4%

18.8

5%

42.1

1%

11.8

8%

31.3

3%

15.4

3%

9.4

3%

9.9

6%

14.3

4%

12.5

0%

12.7

0%

41.8

2%

8.8

9%

54.1

9%

14.00%

22.00%

11.00%

7.00%

6.00%

16.00%

11.00% 8.00%

35.00%

9.00%

31.00%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

HAM HOWE KEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VAN WDLN YATE ZOL

Ave

rage

Build

ing

Pro

fici

ency

2016-17 to 2017-18 Math Interim (3-5) and NYS Exam Average Proficiency Comparison (3-5)

2016-17 Nov 2017-18 Nov 2016-17 Mar 2017-18 Mar State 16-17 State 17-18

• NYS Math Proficiency 2016-17

• Interim Proficiency 2017-18

• Participation = Mar Interim

• NYS Math Proficiency

2017-18 “Embargoed”

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA

14

Interim Tested/Participation CP MP OMS

Total Tested (Mar Interim) 548 376 482

Participation (Mar Interim) 84% 68% 75%JD

17.4

7%

5.4

7%

8.6

3%

15.1

2%

6.9

8%

10.6

0%

17.5

4%

8.6

3%

16.1

6%

16.6

1%

15.7

3%

12.3

0%

11.00%

5.00%8.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

45.00%

50.00%

CPMS MPMS ONMS

Ave

rage

Build

ing

Pro

fici

ency

Building

2016-17 to 2017-18 Math Interim (6-8) and NYS Exam Average Proficiency Comparison (6-8)

2016-17 Nov 2017-18 Nov 2016-17 Mar 2017-18 Mar State 16-17 State 17-18

• NYS Math Proficiency 2016-17

• Interim Proficiency 2017-18

• Participation = Mar Interim

• NYS Math Proficiency

2017-18 “Embargoed”

15

50.65%

84.34%

51.60%

47.19%

94.44%

79.91%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Algebra I Algebra II Geometry

Perc

ent

Pro

fici

ent

Common Core Assessments

2016-17 2017-18

Total Tested Algebra I Algebra II Geometry

2016-17 841 115 219

2017-18 924 90 214JD

Math Common Core Regents Assessments

2016-17 to 2017-18 Proficiency Comparison

• Slight decrease in Algebra I, but

increase in student test takers

• Increased # of 9th grade

students taking Geometry

• 10% increase in Algebra II,

28% in Geometry

16

Additional NYS Assessments

36%

68%

48%

58%

51%

70%

55%

60%

73%

38%

89%

41%

72%

65%

47%

54%

69%

43%

53%

77%

48%

86%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

HAM HOWE KEANE LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VAN WDLN YATE ZOLR

Ave

rage

Build

ing

Pro

fici

ency

NYS Fourth Grade Science 2016-17 to 2017-18 Comparison, by Building

2016-17 2017-18

JD

17

Ham How Kean Linc MLK Paig PV Van Wdl Yate Zol

Total Tested 2016-17 75 59 52 57 80 86 56 63 55 50 53

Total Tested 2017-18 73 50 62 57 103 72 70 70 52 69 64

• NYS Science Grade 4 – overall

increase in proficiency

• Exam not yet adapted to NGSS

• Buildings working to unpack

NGSS and integrate across

disciplines

32%

22%

37%

19%

9%

34%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

CPMS MPMS ONMS

Ave

rage

Build

ing

Pro

fici

ency

NYS Eighth Grade Science Year - to -Year Comparison by Building

2016-17 2017-18

18

CP MP OMS

Total Tested 2016-17 152 158 112

Total Tested 2017-18 162 113 111

JD

• NYS Science Grade 8 – overall decrease in proficiency

• Exam not yet adapted to NGSS

• Does not include students that were enrolled in Regents-

level Living Environment (30% of the 8th grade population)

• Increased focus on Scientific Discourse at the Middle-level

19

50.5

1%

70.3

5%

49.3

2%

42.0

5%

61.3

6%

55.0

0%

49.2

9%

70.0

4%

42.4

1%

67.9

7%

53.2

2%

72.2

2%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

Global History US History Living Environment Earth Science Chemistry Physics

Perc

ent

Pro

fici

ent

NYS Additional Regents Assessments

2016-17 to 2017-18 Comparison

2016-17 2017-18

Total

Tested

Global

History

US History Living

Environment

Earth

Science

Chemistry Physics

2016-17 687 560 805 302 220 60

2017-18 702 564 837 256 171 72KB

• Slight decreases in Living Environment, but increased # of test

takers and both have same # of students proficient

• Significant increases in Earth Science (26%) and Physics (17%)

20

100.0

0%

58.4

1%

95.5

6%

43.6

4%

8.5

7%

100.0

0%

56.2

5%

83.0

5%

34.7

6%

14.2

9%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

CPMS MPMS ONMS SCHS SCLA

Perc

ent

Pro

fici

ent

Percent Proficient on NYS Regents Exam, by Building

Algebra I Living Environment

CP(8) MP(8) ON(8) SHS SCLA

Total Tested Algebra I 35 113 45 653 70

Total Tested LE 45 64 59 633 35

TD

• Algebra I and Living Environment offered at the Middle Level

(8th Grade) as well as at SHS

• Algebra I:

• MPMS 50% participation, 66 kids proficient

• OMS & CPMS 20% participation, 35 & 43 kids proficient

• Living Environment:

• MPMS 28% participation, 36 kids proficient

• OMS (26%) & CPMS (19%) participation, 45 & 48 kids proficient

21

35.8

0%

0.0

0%

33.3

0%

27.1

0%

1.9

0%

2.4

0%

30.3

0%

42.9

0%

6.1

0%

25.9

0%

0.0

0%

35.0

0%

18.2

7%

14.1

4%

1.7

9%

39.6

2%

58.0

6%

16.1

3%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

Algebra I Algebra II Geometry ELA Global

History

US History &

Gov't

Living

Environment

Phy

Set/Chemistry

Phy Set/Earth

Sci

Perc

ent

Pro

fici

ent

Percent Proficient on August Regents by Content Area

Year to Year Comparison

2016-17 2017-18KB

Total

Tested

Algebra

I

Algebra

II

Geo ELA Global

History

US &

Gov’t

LE Phy

Set/Chem

Phy

Set/ES

2016-17 134 1 70 24 108 142 21 33 42

2017-18 166 1 20 104 99 56 212 31 31

• August Regents exams are re-takes of exams

• SCSD students participated in a BOCES-run

Regional Summer School

• Subsequent slide depicts credits earned in

Summer School

• Increase of 9.32% proficient in Living

Environment, but large increase in enrollment:

7 kids (16-17) vs. & 84 kids (17-18) proficient

22

Middle and High School Level

Advanced Courses

23

8 15 8 15 14 79 21 3 21 19 49 9 14 9 9 8 38 12 298

173101

175 84

210

7542

120 159

83

144

130193

120 198 102

130

68 102

92% 92% 93% 92%

86%

73%

78%

93%

85%

89%

100%

75%

94% 93% 93%96%

93%

77%

85%

98%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

2016-1

7

2017-1

8

Enriched

English 7

Enriched

Social Studies

7

Accelerated

Math 7/8

Advanced

French 8

Advanced

Spanish 8

Regents

Algebra I

Enriched

English 8

Enriched

Social Studies

8

Regents Living

Environment

Studio in Art

8

% S

tudents

Pas

sing

# o

f Stu

dents

Enro

lled

Failing Passing % Passing

Number of Middle Level Students Enrolled in Accelerated Courses

2016-17 compared to 2017-18 with % Passing

• % passing course, summative exam or final project each year

• Algebra & Living Environment % passing are Regents exams

• 61 additional students received credit in 8th grade for Algebra

24

93.4

5%

95.2

3%

96.3

0%

98.8

9%

96.5

8%

90.1

6%

84.8

1%

98.8

5%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

9 (Pre-IB) 10 (Pre-IB) 11 12

Perc

ent

Pas

sing

2016-17 2017-18

IB Course

Enrollments 9th Grade 10th Grade 11th Grade 12th Grade

Enrollment 2016-17 228 214 146 108

Enrollment 2017-18 237 203 146 128

Percentage of Students Passing High-School Level Pre-International Baccalaureate (IB) and IB Courses

2016-17 Compared to 2017-18

• 2016-17 = 696 (unique) students

enrolled in Pre-IB / IB Courses

• 2017-18 = 714 (unique) students

enrolled in Pre-IB / IB Courses

• % include duplicated students

• NEW Sports Medicine Course in

2017-18 school year

25

93.3

8%

96.5

9%

95.4

5%

98.4

7%

93.3

5%

100.0

0%

100.0

0%

100.0

0%

99.1

9%

97.0

4%

96.9

4%

90.3

2%

68.2

5%

96.5

1%

100.0

0%

100.0

0%

100.0

0%

100.0

0%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

100.00%

ENG SS MATH SCI FL VA TECH MUSIC IB PROG

Perc

ent

Pas

sing

Department

Percentage of High School Students Passing IB Courses, by Department

2016-17 to 2017-18 Comparison

2016-17 2017-18

• SHS offers 46 different

International Baccalaureate

course offerings

26

End-of-Year

Report Card

Achievement Data

27Number of Students (K-6) Below Achievement for Grade Level on Report Cards*

*Q1 to Q2 to Q3 to Q4

1 course 2 courses 3 or > courses

BLDG

17-18

Q1

17-18

Q2

17-18

Q3

17-18

Q4

17-18

Q1

17-18

Q2

17-18

Q3

17-18

Q4

17-18

Q1

17-18

Q2

17-18

Q3

17-18

Q4

HAM 71 57 50 46 53 50 29 34 104 82 72 63 (63)

HOWE 51 37 30 33 30 21 22 19 38 45 31 33 (42)

KEAN 25 34 22 21 25 19 18 21 32 38 31 25 (20)

LINC 57 61 52 57 27 25 18 22 78 70 50 51 (51)

MLK 82 73 71 77 56 40 38 37 91 91 74 71 (56)

PAIG 67 65 63 61 37 40 33 30 79 71 61 56 (70)

PLVY 73 83 99 68 47 48 38 35 70 62 57 48 (75)

VAN 42 47 48 34 29 26 22 27 67 69 49 34 (37)

WDLN 38 43 45 44 22 24 24 28 50 37 40 34 (43)

YATE 67 48 52 61 39 44 29 30 82 88 96 80 (67)

ZOL 28 35 28 31 35 19 16 11 25 30 38 35 (23)

CPMS

(6) 24 38 35 40 16 12 14 13 10 18 20 16 (12)

MPMS

(6) 51 28 31 19 13 14 10 9 20 7 12 9 (37)

ONMS

(6) 40 49 56 51 24 26 22 18 25 43 33 44 (34)Qtr 4 Ham How Kean Linc MLK Paig PV Van Wdl Yate Zol CP6 MP6 OMS6

Total 437 371 343 344 539 490 424 374 399 394 429 235 246 247

1 course

8 buildings

decreased

2 courses

8 buildings

decreased

3 or > courses

11 buildings

decreased

course failures

28

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1 Course 2 Courses 3 or > Courses

Asian 107 100 71 79 37 38 38 33 68 50 38 36

Black or African American 261 255 262 230 158 158 126 112 269 271 234 235

Hispanic/Latino 66 69 69 69 48 58 38 47 109 105 104 89

Two or more races 87 77 85 69 61 41 33 47 86 91 78 63

White 192 195 194 195 148 113 98 94 238 234 209 176

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Num

ber

of St

udents

Number of Courses by Quarter

Number of Students (K-6) Below Achievement for Grade Level within Race

(i.e. working of key concepts, processes and skills that are below grade level expectations)

Quarter 4 Asian Black/African

American

Hispanic/Latino Two or More

Races

White

Total 861 1659 514 601 1626

29

CALCULATING RELATIVE RISK FOR

3 OR > COURSES BELOW ACHIEVEMENT, GRADES K-6

Definition:

The risk of a subgroup

falling below

achievement for 3 or

more courses

compared to

The risk of all other

students falling below

achievement for 3 or

more courses

Relative Risk:

Subgroup Relative Risk

2017-18 Q4 falling below

achievement, 3 or >

courses

Hispanic 1.62

Asian 0.33

Black 1.41

White 0.93

Two or more 0.91

30Number of Students (7-12) with Report Cards <65*

*Q1 to Q2 to Q3 to Q4

1 course 2 courses 3 or > courses

Building

17-18

Q1

17-18

Q2

17-18

Q3

17-18

Q4

17-18

Q1

17-18

Q2

17-18

Q3

17-18

Q4

17-18

Q1

17-18

Q2

17-18

Q3

17-18

Q4

CPMS 84 109 105 90 47 44 39 55 80 72 79

77

(93)

MPMS 82 93 86 76 46 53 54 65 90 131 146

153

(181)

ONMS 78 83 85 113 54 41 47 38 84 103 82

100

(151)

SHS 545 482 495 475 277 312 271 285 777 821 782

794

(948)

SCLA 40 28 36 33 36 21 30 19 150 152 138

119

(128)

Quarter 4 CP(78) MP(78) OMS(78) SHS SCLA

Total 458 448 459 2246 228

1 course

4 buildings

decreased

course failures

2 courses

2 buildings

decreased

course failures

3 or > courses

2 buildings

decreased

course failures

31Number of Students (Grades 7-12) with Final Year Course Failures

Final Course Grades <65, 2016-17 to 2017-18 Comparison

324

172

682

3422

100

286

196

520

24 22

107

-48

24

-155

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

1 Course 2 Courses 3+ Courses

# o

f St

udents

with C

ours

e F

ailu

res

2016-17 SHS 2016-17 SCLA 2017-18 SHS 2017-18 SCLA Year-to-Year Combined Difference

Year-to-Year

1 course

48 fewer students

Year-to-Year

2 courses

24 + students

Year-to-Year

3 or > courses

155 fewer

students

20% improvement!

32

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

1 Course 2 Courses 3 or > Courses

Asian 170 167 199 192 77 95 64 93 140 163 164 167

Black or African American 307 277 309 279 196 186 187 180 534 566 534 530

Hispanic/Latino 120 115 108 106 70 76 62 71 177 190 194 198

Two or more races 23 21 27 16 6 11 10 12 22 21 24 25

White 213 213 164 195 110 105 115 105 319 346 316 325

0

100

200

300

400

500

600N

um

ber

of St

udents

Number of Courses by Quarter

Number of Students (7-12) with Report Cards <65 within Race*

*Q1 to Q2 to Q3 to Q4

Quarter 4 Asian Black/African

American

Hispanic/Latino Two or More

Races

White

Total 854 1331 539 78 1022

33

CALCULATING RELATIVE RISK FOR

3 OR > COURSE FAILURES, GRADES 7-12

Definition:

The risk of a

subgroup failing 3 or

more courses

compared to

The risk of all other

students failing 3 or

more courses

Relative Risk:

Subgroup Relative Risk

2017-18 Q4 Final Mark

Hispanic 1.06

Asian 0.47

Black 1.53

White 1.01

Two or more 0.74

34

June & August

Graduation Rates

35

59% 60%

34%

74%

51%

60% 59%

39%

59%

69%

35%

70%

51% 52%

61%

27%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

SHS SES SWD ASIAN BLACK HISPANIC WHITE ELL

Gra

duat

ion R

ate

Schenectady High School June Graduation Rate 2016-17 to 2017-18 Comparison

2016-17 2017-18

Year Total in Cohort

2016-17 726

2017-18 713

36

63%65%

37%

80%

61% 60%62%

44%

63%

74%

38%

81%

56% 57%

63%

53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

SHS SES SWD ASIAN BLACK HISPANIC WHITE ELL

Gra

duat

ion R

ate

Schenectady High School Combined June & August Graduation Rate 2016-17 to 17-18 Comparison

2016-17 2017-18

Year Total in Cohort

2016-17 726

2017-18 713

37

Summer School

Participation

38

109

186

167

100

183

145

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

0.00 0.25-1.00 1.25-2.00

Tota

l N

um

ber

of Stu

dents

Total Credits Earned

Total Number of SCSD Students Enrolled in Summer School and Credits Earned

Summer School 2016-17 to 2017-18 Comparison

2016-17 2017-18

Summer

School

Year

Number

of

Students

Enrolled

% of

Students

Earning

Credit(s)

2016-17 462 76%

2017-18 428 77%

89% of students enrolled in

2017-18 earned 1.00 full credit

39

Office of

Curriculum & Instruction

Areas of Priority

AREAS OF FOCUS – OFFICE OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION

Areas of Priority Initiatives & Responses

Fluency, Literacy & Summer Slide • Fluency Targets

• Increase Literacy Resources/Interventions

• Summer Teaching and Learning Institute

• Summer Enrichment Program

• Book Mobile

• Text Sets Professional Development

• Disciplinary Literacy

• New Universal Screener K-12

8th Grade Science @ Middle Level • Math/Science Partnership Grant

• Increased Focus on Scientific Discourse

• Larger Selection of NGSS Science Kits

• STEAM and FabLab

Interim Participation Rate @ Middle Level • Action plans for consistent administration and make-up cycles

• Refined administration protocols

• Increased expectation

Elementary, Middle and High School

Mathematics

• Curriculum Writing Week & Math Units

• NGMS

• Math Solutions (Grades 4 & 5)

• Institute for Learning (Grades 6 through 9)

• Eureka! Math

• New Universal Screener K-12

ELA Common Core Regents Exams • Curriculum Writing Week & ELA Units

• General Education Continuum

• Data Triangulation within PLCs

• Institute for Learning Professional Development (Grades 8-11)

Graduation Rate • Data Protocols with Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles

• Decreasing Student Course Failures

• Increasing Students’ Opportunities for Advanced Coursework

• Increased Participation in Fine Arts

41

OCI ACTION PLANNING FOR

CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

42

End-of-Year

Behavior Data

200

235

269

264

562

596

620

620

945

868

1008

800

181

169

197

198

427

502

448

511

1087

973

1016

754

355

475420 429

1718

2000

1746

1450

2438 2707

3711

2300

281 224 244 241

1009 1015

889980

3171

2854

2646

1857

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Elementary Schools Middle Schools High School

Comparison of Unique Students to Incidents, By Quarter, By Building Level, 2016-17 to 17-18

2016-17 Students 2017-18 Students 2016-17 Incidents 2017-18 Incidents

Quarter 4 ES MS HS

Total Enrollment 4790 2092 2489

43

HAML HOWE KEAN KING LINC PAIG PLVY VCLR WDLN YATE ZOLR

2017-18 Q1 Students 20 3 17 7 13 36 17 17 23 17 11

2017-18 Q2 Students 14 7 13 5 15 37 13 7 29 17 12

2017-18 Q3 Students 17 8 12 10 8 26 31 34 28 12 11

2017-18 Q4 Students 13 18 21 10 13 24 28 15 29 14 13

2017-18 Q1 Incidents 28 5 25 9 19 95 17 18 31 22 12

2017-18 Q2 Incidents 20 8 17 8 14 55 16 7 41 20 18

2017-18 Q3 Incidents 14 15 17 8 14 40 48 22 31 19 16

2017-18 Q4 Incidents 14 17 24 11 21 26 46 14 35 17 16

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Number of Unique Students and Incidents by Building, Grades K-5*

*Q1 vs Q2 vs Q3 vs Q4

Quarter 4

Enrollment

Ham How Kean Linc MLK Paig PV Van Wdl Yate Zol

Total 437 371 343 344 539 490 424 374 399 394 429

44

Incident =

something

that violated

the code of

conduct.

5 out of 11

buildings

reduced # of

students

involved in

an incident

6 out of 11

buildings

reduced # of

incidents

CNPK MTPL ONDA SCHS SCLA

2017-18 Q1 Students 117 192 118 966 121

2017-18 Q2 Students 146 217 139 851 122

2017-18 Q3 Students 125 212 111 912 104

2017-18 Q4 Students 132 254 125 689 65

2017-18 Q1 Incidents 346 401 262 2829 342

2017-18 Q2 Incidents 336 412 267 2401 453

2017-18 Q3 Incidents 333 326 230 2350 296

2017-18 Q4 Incidents 317 416 247 1738 119

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Number of Unique Students and Incidents by Building, Grades 6-12*

*Q1 vs Q2 vs Q3 vs Q4

Quarter 4 Enrollment CP MP OMS SHS SCLA

Total 693 694 706 2246 228

45

Incident =

something

that violated

the code of

conduct.

2 out of 5

buildings

reduced # of

students

involved in

an incident

3 out of 5

buildings

reduced # of

incidents

236

341

356

509

1284

2769

2989

3454

1049

1691

1884

2128

197

168

190

299

1120

1810

1701

2324

992

1335

1880

1815

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

ES MS HS

Tota

l N

um

ber

of Susp

ensi

on D

ays

Building Level by Quarter

2016-17 2017-18

46Total Number of Suspension Days, Building Level Comparison

2016-17 to 2017-18

HA

M

HO

WE

KE

AN

LIN

C

ML

K

PAI

G

PLV

Y

VC

LR

W

DL

N

YA

TE

ZO

L

CP

MS

MP

MS

ON

MS

SH

S

SC

LA

2017-18 Q1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 0 8 1

2017-18 Q2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 10 10 3

2017-18 Q3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 13 8 24 3

2017-18 Q4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 16 19 7

05

1015202530

Num

ber

of St

udents

Building

20+ Days

HA

M

HO

WE

KE

AN

LIN

C

ML

K

PAI

G

PLV

Y

VC

LR

W

DL

N

YA

TE

ZO

L

CP

MS

MP

MS

ON

MSSHS

SCL

A

2017-18 Q1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 9 0 5 2

2017-18 Q2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10 7 6 3

2017-18 Q3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 7 10 1

2017-18 Q4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 13 12 2

02468

101214

Num

ber

of St

udents

Building

11-19 Days

HA

M

HO

WE

KE

AN

LIN

C

ML

K

PAI

G

PLV

Y

VC

LR

W

DL

N

YA

TE

ZO

L

CP

MS

MP

MS

ON

MS

SH

S

SC

LA

2017-18 Q1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 6 13 7 20 6

2017-18 Q2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 11 16 13 20 7

2017-18 Q3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 7 7 36 6

2017-18 Q4 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 2 9 18 19 25 2

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Num

ber

of St

udents

Building

6-10 Days

HA

M

HO

WE

KE

AN

LIN

C

ML

K

PAI

G

PLV

Y

VC

LR

W

DL

N

YA

TE

ZO

L

CP

MS

MP

MS

ON

MSSHS

SCL

A

2017-18 Q1 7 1 7 3 2 12 4 1 4 17 5 44 61 53 140 39

2017-18 Q2 6 1 8 2 8 15 7 3 6 12 8 47 79 57 179 38

2017-18 Q3 2 1 2 1 7 8 17 12 5 11 8 52 80 53 187 35

2017-18 Q4 6 5 8 5 10 5 27 8 13 9 13 62 102 65 163 33

020406080

100120140160180200

Num

ber

of St

udents

Building

1-5 Days

47Number of Student Suspensions by Building, by Quarter

10 buildings

reduced

suspensions

or stayed the

same

12 buildings

reduced

suspensions

or stayed the

same

14 buildings

reduced

suspensions

or stayed the

same

5 buildings

reduced

suspensions

or stayed the

same

Quarter

4

Ham How Kean Linc MLK Paig PV Van Wdl Yate Zol CP MP OMS SHS SCLA

Total 455 389 361 361 569 517 440 407 417 412 449 693 694 706 2249 228

48

CALCULATING RELATIVE RISK

STUDENT SUSPENSIONS

Definition:

The risk of a

subgroup being

suspended

compared to

The risk of all other

students being

suspended

Relative Risk:

Subgroup Relative Risk

2017-18 Q4

(2016-17 Q4)

Relative Risk

2017-18 Entire

School Year

Hispanic 1.18 (1.23) 1.17

Asian 0.21 (0.28) 0.30

Black 2.23 (2.49) 2.06

White 0.78 (0.64) 0.76

Two or more 0.73 (0.50) 0.78

49

End-of-Year

Student Attendance Data

HAM

L

HOW

EKEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VCLR

WDL

NYATE ZOLR CNPK MTPL

OND

ASCHS SCLA

2017-18 Q1 124 93 113 92 152 157 130 115 134 106 142 193 152 189 319 29

2017-18 Q2 45 57 41 21 40 64 34 31 57 40 70 27 43 79 149 18

2017-18 Q3 80 69 72 54 88 114 69 52 68 85 85 122 111 104 163 24

2017-18 Q4 53 74 53 26 37 83 45 54 72 60 73 54 75 84 157 30

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Num

ber

of St

udents

Building

50

4 out of the 16 buildings

saw an increase in the

number of students with

perfect attendance

Quarter

4

Ham How Kean Linc MLK Paig PV Van Wdl Yate Zol CP MP OMS SHS SCLA

Total 455 389 361 361 569 517 440 407 417 412 449 693 694 706 2249 228

#projectbehere

Perfect Attendance*

*Q1 vs Q2 vs Q3 vs Q4

HA

ML

HO

WE

KE

AN

LIN

C

ML

K

PAI

G

PLV

Y

VC

LR

W

DL

N

YA

TE

ZO

LR

CN

PK

MT

PL

ON

DA

SC

HS

SCL

A

2017-18 Q1 3 2 1 1 3 1 0 0 2 1 1 5 10 14 277 45

2017-18 Q2 10 2 3 3 23 3 7 9 2 8 5 18 27 28 372 61

2017-18 Q3 2 1 1 7 8 3 4 4 1 3 5 15 22 28 401 70

2017-18 Q4 6 4 4 8 25 4 11 5 2 12 7 36 31 43 461 64

050

100150200250300350400450500

Student Absences, 20+ Days*

*Q1 to Q2 to Q3 to Q4

HA

ML

HO

WE

KEA

N

LIN

C

ML

K

PAI

G

PLV

Y

VCL

R

WD

LN

YAT

E

ZO

LR

CN

PK

MT

PL

ON

DA

SC

HS

SCL

A

2017-18 Q1 16 9 14 6 21 12 9 12 18 9 12 30 39 28 312 59

2017-18 Q2 53 19 23 40 74 23 40 40 28 69 28 58 108 86 443 59

2017-18 Q3 39 7 17 15 36 15 34 42 22 28 20 45 66 55 425 52

2017-18 Q4 54 22 27 26 80 26 45 48 21 45 23 75 72 83 435 45

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Student Absences, 11-19 Days*

*Q1 to Q2 to Q3 to Q4

HA

ML

HO

WE

KE

AN

LIN

C

ML

K

PAI

G

PLV

Y

VC

LR

W

DL

N

YA

TE

ZO

LR

CN

PK

MT

PL

ON

DA

SC

HS

SCL

A

2017-18 Q1 57 26 34 34 61 38 35 40 30 38 22 70 103 74 337 46

2017-18 Q2 132 76 71 112 144 106 109 82 80 123 93 148 158 138 492 56

2017-18 Q3 94 55 64 57 124 71 98 83 75 74 79 119 144 136 402 40

2017-18 Q4 110 75 46 68 126 100 101 74 77 83 83 125 110 122 391 40

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Student Absences, 6-10 Days*

*Q1 to Q2 to Q3 to Q4

HA

ML

HO

WE

KE

AN

LIN

C

ML

K

PAI

G

PLV

Y

VC

LR

W

DL

N

YA

TE

ZO

LR

CN

PK

MT

PL

ON

DA

SC

HS

SCL

A

2017-18 Q1 283 273 196 227 340 321 295 242 248 264 293 416 403 406 1175 110

2017-18 Q2 248 249 226 192 299 334 280 252 275 187 286 469 371 383 932 79

2017-18 Q3 258 271 218 235 325 324 269 242 278 240 288 418 367 390 948 75

2017-18 Q4 237 217 233 239 305 308 247 233 260 225 280 412 415 380 838 73

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Student Absences, 1-5 Days*

*Q1 to Q2 to Q3 to Q4

13 buildings

saw a

decrease in

absences

6 buildings

saw an

decrease in

absences

2 buildings

saw an

decrease in

absences

1 buildings

saw an

decrease in

absences

51

#projectbehere

#projectbehere

52

End-of-Year

Teacher Attendance Data

HAM HOWE KEAN LINC MLK PAIG PLVY VCLR WDLN YATE ZOL CPMS MPMS ONMS SHS SCLA

Q1 80% 55% 34% 65% 63% 50% 58% 76% 53% 63% 64% 51% 56% 49% 51% 52%

Q2 46% 30% 41% 32% 37% 48% 53% 35% 29% 45% 44% 46% 49% 45% 44% 34%

Q3 48% 55% 41% 49% 49% 45% 53% 62% 29% 53% 56% 43% 38% 51% 61% 48%

Q4 54% 24% 7% 35% 39% 43% 17% 32% 21% 26% 31% 22% 32% 41% 40% 41%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent

of T

eac

hers

with L

ess

than

2 A

bse

nce

s

Building

% of SFT with less than 2 absences*

*Q1 vs Q2 vs Q3 vs Q453

54

Office of Pupil Personnel

Services Areas of Focus

55

OFFICE OF PUPIL PERSONNEL SERVICES

OVERVIEW OF INITIATIVES PRESENTED 2017-18

MindUp – Social Emotional Learning

Circle UP!

Continuum of Restorative Practices

Help for Billy

Trauma Sensitive Schools Institute & Implementation Teams

Sensory Rooms and Classroom Calming Spaces

Mindful Moments and Mindful Art

Urban School Conference

Trauma Informed Care & Community Resiliency

Staff, Parent & Student Wellness

PBIS & PAX Good Behavior Game

Attendance Committee & Attendance Interventions

#projectbehere

Disproportionality & Relative Risk

Reducing Suspensions

Code of Conduct Committee

TSS

Attendance Interventions

Behavior Interventions

55

56

o Attendance Committee

o Parent Portal

o Attendance Manual

o Attendance Intervention Plan

o Data Analysis & Target Setting

Attendance Matters: #projectbehere

57

58

59

THANK YOU!

QUESTIONS?