2017-18 student growth portfolio - amazon...

39
2017-18 Student Growth Portfolio District Portfolio Leads Keely Potter, Director of Teacher Effectiveness, TDoE

Upload: truongthuy

Post on 30-Mar-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

2017-18 Student Growth Portfolio

District Portfolio Leads

Keely Potter, Director of Teacher Effectiveness, TDoE

§  During this webinar, we will present the TN Student Growth Portfolio process

§  The webinar will be recorded and will begin once we show the Title screen

§  Participants will be muted during this webinar §  If you have questions or a comment, please use the Q&A

feature in your Zoom bar. We will try to respond as we go in the Q&A window

Conducting this Webinar

2

2017-18 Student Growth Portfolio

District Portfolio Leads

Keely Potter, Director of Teacher Effectiveness, TDoE

§  To communicate the structural and content-specific revisions made to the 2017-18 student growth portfolios

§  To explain the purpose of the changes

§  To demonstrate how to upload and score work samples

Purpose of Webinar

4

§  Student growth portfolio models provide a holistic, meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to his/her students using work already happening in the classroom

§  The right work –  Student centered –  Teacher developed –  Flexible assessment –  Professional learning and growth –  Peer reviewed by content specialists –  Correlated with state evaluation models

Why a student growth portfolio model?

5

§  Purposeful collection of student work organized into evidence collections that demonstrate student growth within the state standards.

§  Uses a scoring guide that includes the levels of performance for various standards.

§  Contains student work from two points in time. §  Student work at varying levels (emerging, proficient,

advanced).

What is a student growth portfolio model?

6

Purposeful sampling is the process of choosing student work artifacts for inclusion in the evidence collections as a formal part of the evaluation process.

What is purposeful sampling?

7

Student Growth Portfolio

8

§  Increase accuracy by focusing solely on the scoring of student work and then allowing the system to calculate growth scores and teacher effectiveness indicator result

§  Focus on capturing teacher feedback and reflections on student work – not just the score

§  Increase efficiency and reduce bias in sampling by focusing on scoring student work alone

Why a new process?

9

§  Fine Arts –  Visual Arts –  Music –  Dance –  Theater

§  Physical Education (K-5; 6-8 optional) §  Pre-K §  Kindergarten §  Grade 1 §  CTE – Work Based Learning (pilot) §  World Language

Student Growth Grades and Subjects

10

§  Structure of the portfolio –  Contains evidence collections – one for each domain

–  Each evidence collection contains two assessments (Point A and Point B) that assess the same GLE/CLEs

–  Each assessment has 3 differentiated samples of work (emerging, proficient, advanced) that are representative of teacher’s course load and student population (purposeful)

§  Teachers must upload a context/narrative form with each student sample indicating which domain and GLE/CLE is being assessed

Submission of the Student Samples

11

§  Scoring Rubrics –  Two levels have been added to each scoring rubric to capture growth beyond

levels 4 and 5 (except World Languages) –  Teachers must score the same GLE/CLE for both the Point A and Point B

assessments of a given evidence collection §  Consensus Scoring Process using Educopia

–  Teachers upload and then rate each student sample –  Rating consists of tagging evidence and feedback within the actual work

samples and entering scores for each sample –  Once all students are scored for a given assessment, the teacher may submit

the work for Peer Review –  Peer reviewers will also tag and score each student work sample per

assessment –  Teachers and peer reviewers will only score the student work. There is NO

calculation of student growth required by the teacher or peer reviewer.

Scoring of Submissions

12

§  Growth Score Reporting –  Once all peer reviewers have completed scoring, the

student growth score for each evidence collection will be calculated by the Educopia system

–  Then, the Teacher Effectiveness rating will be calculated across all of the student growth scores

§  Teachers will be notified when growth scores are available to view within the Educopia system

§  Growth scores will be exported to the state

Growth Scores

13

§  The difference between the Point A and Point B assessments is calculated for each student to obtain an individual student growth score

§  The average of all 3 individual growth scores is calculated

§  The average is applied towards the Growth Score ranges to determine the Growth Score (level) for the collection

Calculation of Growth Scores

§  Level 1 –  Zero or negative growth

§  Level 2 –  Less than 1 level growth

§  Level 3 –  1 level growth (but less than

2) §  Level 4

–  2 levels growth (but less than 3)

§  Level 5 –  3 or more levels of growth

14

§  The average of all evidence collection Growth Score levels is calculated

§  The average is applied towards the Teacher Effectiveness ranges to determine the Teacher Effectiveness rating for the teacher

Calculation of Teacher Effectiveness

§  Level 1 –  1.00-1.79

§  Level 2 –  1.80-2.59

§  Level 3 –  2.60-3.39

§  Level 4 –  3.40-4.19

§  Level 5 –  4.20-5.00

15

Content Specific Changes for 2017-18

16

§  Total collections to submit: 4 –  ELA

•  Literature/Narrative •  Informational

–  Math •  Counting and Cardinality •  Geometry or Measurement and Data

§  Each ELA collection has three options and teachers must select the same option for the Point A and the Point B.

Pre-Kindergarten

17

§  Total collections to submit: 4 –  ELA

•  Literature/Narrative •  Informational

–  Math •  Counting and Cardinality •  Operations and Algebraic Thinking

§  Each ELA collection has three options and teachers must select the same option for the Point A and the Point B.

Kindergarten

18

§  Total collections to submit: 4 –  ELA

•  Literature/Narrative •  Informational

–  Math •  Operations and Algebraic Thinking •  Number and Operations Base Ten

§  Each ELA collection has three options and teachers must select the same option for the Point A and the Point B.

Grade 1

19

§  Total collections to submit: 4 –  Four evidence collections for the Perform domain (psycho-motor) –  Two students’ work for both the Point A and Point B should be

submitted for each performance level (emerging, proficient, and advanced) for each evidence collection

–  Teachers must assess the same GLE/CLEs for the Point A and Point B for a given evidence collection

Physical Education (Grades K-5; 6-8)

20

§  Language Change: –  Type 1 is now referred to as a “Group Sample” –  Type 2 is now referred to as a “Differentiated Sample”

§  Evidence collections are generically labeled to give teachers flexibility in selecting at least 3 of 4 domains.

§  Teachers must specify which domain they are submitting for a given evidence collection through the Context Form

§  Teachers must select a specific domain for each evidence collection and score the same GLE/CLEs for the Point A and Point B in that evidence collection

Fine Arts

21

§  Total collections to submit: 1 –  Work Based Learning

§  Teachers will upload 3 samples for the Early and Late Assessments and score the work in Educopia

§  Teachers must indicate which standards are being assessed in the Context Form

§  Teachers must score at least one standard from each domain –  Career Knowledge and Navigation Skills –  21st Century Learning and Innovation Skills –  Personal and Social Skills

§  The same standards should be scored in both the Early and Late Assessments

CTE

22

§  Total collections to submit: 4 –  Writing: Interpersonal Communication –  Reading: Interpretive Communication –  Speaking: Presentational Communication –  Reflection

§  Teachers will upload 3 samples for the Point A and Point B and score the work in Educopia

World Language

23

Educopia

24

Confidential Information – Copyright © 2015 Educopia

Educopia

Uploading and Scoring Work

Product Overview

Confidential Information – Copyright © 2015 Educopia 26

Teacher Process

§  Prepare for your evidence collections §  Collect your student work for Point A §  Determine your purposeful sample §  Upload and score the Point A samples §  Collect your student work for Point B §  Upload and score the Point B samples §  Submit the collection

Confidential Information – Copyright © 2015 Educopia 27

§  You will receive an introduction from TN Student Growth Team

§  You will then get an activation email from Educopia

§  Click on the button in the email to activate your account

§  You will be asked to create a password for your account

§  Then, you will be able to log into the system

Please contact [email protected] if you have not received your email

Activate Your Account

Confidential Information – Copyright © 2015 Educopia 28

DEMONSTRATION

Confidential Information – Copyright © 2015 Educopia 29

What happens next…§  Teachers submit their evidence

collections §  Peer reviewers view an evidence

collection and score the student work

§  If the scores agree, then the Growth Score for the domain will be calculated

§  If discrepant, the evidence collection will be sent to an Expert Reviewer

§  Once all 4 collections are calculated, the Teacher Effectiveness will be calculated

§  A score report will be made available to teachers

Confidential Information – Copyright © 2015 Educopia 30

Reminders

§  Activate your account –  Look for the intro and activation emails from Educopia.

Check Spam or Junk folders just in case –  Enroll for the specific student growth portfolio you will be

submitting in 2017-18 §  Upload your Point A and Point B context form and

samples for each student §  Score each student

–  Tag evidence with comments –  Enter scores

§  Submit your evidence collection after scoring all 3 samples

Confidential Information – Copyright © 2015 Educopia 31

Resources

§  Web site contains more information about the process and will be updated periodically with announcements –  www.tnstudentgrowth.com –  TEAM-tn.org

§  Each evidence collection includes the following resources: –  Portfolio Resource Guide for the specific grade level or

subject that is downloadable –  A video tutorial that walks teachers through the process of

uploading and scoring work and is available in the Educopia system

–  Blank context/narrative form that is downloadable and must be completed for each student sample

Roles and Responsibilities

32

§  Disseminate portfolio-related information to principals and teachers on a consistent basis –  Meet regularly with teachers to discuss status of portfolios

§  Oversee Rostering §  Manage Peer Review Process §  Monitor Portfolio Development §  Notify the district of any approved exemptions and late

submissions by April 1, 2018. §  Identify Portfolio Technology Lead

District Portfolio Leads

33

§  Ensure that all participating teachers have the latest browsers and upgrades to operating system

§  Sign up as a “teacher” to learn the process –  Any technology lead who requests an account will have the

ability to enroll in a specific portfolio and upload and score student work samples

§  Provide first line support and answer basic questions –  Activating accounts –  Using video to capture performances –  Uploading work

District Technology Leads

34

§  Provide teachers with time and resources needed to be successful –  Work sessions to deconstruct standards, set goals for

student work, or develop assessments. –  Reflection

•  Examine portfolios from the 2016-17 school year and determine strengths or areas of need.

§  Make connections to other evaluation components §  Identify potential peer reviewers

School Administrators

35

§  Activate account and enroll in specific portfolio §  View resources to prepare for the portfolio

–  Download your Portfolio Resource Guide –  View the video tutorial

§  Plan for Point A and Point B assessments §  Collect student work for each assessment §  Select three samples for each assessment §  Upload and score each sample §  Submit evidence collections by April 15, 2018

Teacher Responsibilities

36

§  Due to the increased use of the student growth portfolio model, districts have the following expectations: –  Provide 1 peer reviewer for every 10 teachers within a

certain content area –  Criteria for peer reviewers will be shared at a later date

§  Teachers are also asked if they would like to be a peer reviewer

§  There may be some pre-work for peer reviewers in advance of certifying in April 2018

§  Peer reviewers will be trained and need to be certified to qualify as a peer reviewer –  Peer Reviewer training will be conducted in April 2018

Peer Reviewer Expectations

37

§  TEAM Coaches are available to provide support to Portfolio Leads in pre-K/K and opt-in models

§  Additional resources are found on the TN Student Growth website (which is also linked to the TEAM-tn.org web site)

§  Portfolio scoring resource guides will also be found in the TN Student Growth web site (www.tnstudentgrowth.com) and in each evidence collection within the Educopia system

§  Virtual webinar recordings and trainings will continue to be uploaded to the TN Student Growth and TEAM-tn.org websites

Additional Support

38

§  Keely Potter, Director of Teacher Effectiveness –  [email protected]

§  For technical support, please email the Educopia Support Team at [email protected]

Contact Information

39