2017 county and economic development regions population ......number of people moving in or due to a...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Program on Applied Demographics
Web: http://pad.human.cornell.edu Email: [email protected]
2017 County and
Economic Development Regions Population Estimates
Analysis of the US Census Bureau Vintage 2017
Total County Population Estimates
Jan K. Vink
Program on Applied Demographics
Cornell University
![Page 2: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Introduction
On March 22th, 2018 the U.S. Census Bureau released the County total population estimates for April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2017. This document highlights some of these estimates and results when aggregating into the Economic Development Regions. The change in population is split in change due to natural increase and due to net-migration. Natural increase is the difference between the number of births and the number of deaths, net-migration the result of people moving in- and out of a region.
The Census Bureau revises earlier estimates because of boundary changes, availability of more recent data and implementation of a changed methodology. It is therefore recommended not to use data from this release in combination with a previous release and to keep in mind that some of the estimates for the most recent years are model based and will be replaced with more data based estimates when that data becomes available.
This year changes have been made in the methodology to estimate Net International Migration and Net Domestic Migration.
Highlights:
- 6 economic regions lost population since the 2010 Census, 4 gained. 17 counties gained population over that period, 45 lost population.
- For many counties and almost all regions the estimated change in the last year was higher than the previous years. This is mainly due to a higher estimated net domestic migration (people moving between the area and elsewhere in the US). New York City is an exception to this trend. These estimates do not provide inside if this is because less people leave or more people arrive compared with previous years.
- The natural increase is decreasing in most areas.
This paper first examines estimated population change and the components of change for the Economic regions and then highlights some observations on the County level.
Appendix A shows percentage change on the County level on two maps and Appendix B has County level tables, which include rankings. Appendices C and D show more detail and trends for the State and the Economic Regions.
![Page 3: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
State and Economic Development Regions
Total population: Change since last Census and in most recent year
Table 1: Vintage 2017 Population Estimates and by Economic Region, change since 2010 Decennial Census and change in most recent year
Change between 2010 and 2017 Change between 2016 and 2017
Difference Difference
Census 2010
Estimate 2017 Count % Estimate
2016 Estimate
2017 Count %
New York State 19,378,110 19,849,399 471,289 2.4% 19,836,286 19,849,399 13,113 0.1%
Capital Region 1,079,201 1,088,994 9,793 0.9% 1,086,199 1,088,994 2,795 0.3%
Central New York 791,913 780,230 -11,683 -1.5% 782,622 780,230 -2,392 -0.3%
Finger Lakes 1,217,041 1,210,895 -6,146 -0.5% 1,211,735 1,210,895 -840 -0.1%
Long Island 2,833,066 2,862,467 29,401 1.0% 2,860,191 2,862,467 2,276 0.1%
Mid-Hudson 2,290,846 2,341,131 50,285 2.2% 2,333,984 2,341,131 7,147 0.3%
Mohawk Valley 500,138 488,221 -11,917 -2.4% 488,510 488,221 -289 -0.1%
New York City 8,174,959 8,622,698 447,739 5.5% 8,615,426 8,622,698 7,272 0.1%
North Country 433,188 424,898 -8,290 -1.9% 425,411 424,898 -513 -0.1%
Southern Tier 657,975 639,721 -18,254 -2.8% 642,785 639,721 -3,064 -0.5%
Western New York 1,399,783 1,390,144 -9,639 -0.7% 1,389,423 1,390,144 721 0.1%
Highlights:
• Late December 2017, the Census Bureau released State estimates which showed that New York State gained 13,113 residents between July 1st 2016 and July 1st 2017. This increase represents a growth of 0.07%. The population of the nation as a whole increased with 0.7% the last year.
• Since the most recent Census New York State gained 471,289 residents, a growth of 2.4%. This growth percentage is far behind the national growth of 5.5% since 2010, but ahead of most other states in the Northeast (only Massachusetts grew faster).
• Four Economic Regions gained population since April 1, 2010, New York City the most in number (447,739) and in percentage (5.5%). Six Economic Regions lost population since the latest Decennial Census; the Southern Tier lost the most in number (-18,254) and in percentage (-2.8%).
• Between 2016 and 2017, five Economic Regions gained population; New York City, Long Island, and Western New York grew less than 0.1% each. Capital Region and Mid-Hudson grew 0.3%. Five Economic Regions lost population, although the loss in the Mohawk Valley and Finger Lakes was less than 0.1%. The Southern Tier lost the most in number (-3,064) and percentage (-0.5%). Please keep in mind that numbers for the last year are most subject to revisions as newer data becomes available.
![Page 4: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Total population: Annual change in population The charts underneath shows the annual percentage change in population according to the latest estimates.
Figure 1: Annual percentage population change (2010-2017)
Highlights:
• New York State’s grew around 0.6% in the beginning of this decade but this growth has slowed down to 0.1% for the past two years.
• The Mohawk Valley and the Southern Tier saw a decrease in the estimated population in all years. The Capital Region, Mid-Hudson and New York City saw an increase in all years.
• With the exception of New York City, all regions saw a higher change in the last year than in the two years preceding.
• New York City grew fastest since 2010, but the Capital Region and Mid-Hudson grew faster than New York City in just the last year.
• Appendix C and D adds data from the estimated population from 2000-2010. This enables to look at somewhat longer trends. The trends for this decade in Central New York, the Mohawk Valley, the North Country and the Southern Tier are different from trends from the previous decade. The decline in Western New York was also estimated during the previous decade.
![Page 5: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Components of change Change in population can be split into two distinctive so-called components of change:
• Natural Increase, which is the difference between births and deaths, and
• Net Migration, which is the difference between number of people moving in and moving out of the area.
In some areas the natural increase (or decrease) is the main component in overall change, in other areas it is the Net Migration.
Table 2: Components of change by Economic Region (Totals from 2010-2017)
Change between 2010 and 2017
Difference Due to Natural Increase Due to Net-Migration
Census 2010 Estimate 2017 Count % Count Rate Count Rate
New York State 19,378,110 19,849,399 471,289 2.4% 625,484 3.2% -152,501 -0.8%
Capital Region 1,079,201 1,088,994 9,793 0.9% 7,346 0.7% 3,012 0.3%
Central New York 791,913 780,230 -11,683 -1.5% 10,261 1.3% -21,973 -2.8%
Finger Lakes 1,217,041 1,210,895 -6,146 -0.5% 14,631 1.2% -20,584 -1.7%
Long Island 2,833,066 2,862,467 29,401 1.0% 52,087 1.8% -21,969 -0.8%
Mid-Hudson 2,290,846 2,341,131 50,285 2.2% 66,052 2.9% -15,513 -0.7%
Mohawk Valley 500,138 488,221 -11,917 -2.4% -784 -0.2% -11,100 -2.2%
New York City 8,174,959 8,622,698 447,739 5.5% 462,671 5.7% -15,299 -0.2%
North Country 433,188 424,898 -8,290 -1.9% 10,701 2.5% -19,201 -4.4%
Southern Tier 657,975 639,721 -18,254 -2.8% 938 0.1% -19,285 -2.9%
Western New York 1,399,783 1,390,144 -9,639 -0.7% 1,581 0.1% -10,589 -0.8%
Figure 2: Percent change in population split by components of change: Natural Increase and Net Miigration
![Page 6: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Highlights:
• In New York State overall Natural Increase added to the population, but Net Migration was negative. Added together lead to an overall increase in population.
• There is a lot of difference between the regions in how the overall change in population can be split among the components.
• Appendix C and D adds data from the estimated components of change from 2000-2010. This enables to look at longer term trends in these components for each of the regions.
Components of change: Natural Increase Natural increase is the difference between the number of births and the number of deaths in each period. Charts in Appendix C and D visualize trends in natural increase, births and deaths since 2000.
Figure 3: Trends in estimated Natural Increase by Economic Region (2010-2017)
Highlights:
• Natural Increase alone added 3.2% to the New York State’s population since April 2010.
• When comparing between Economic Regions, New York City saw the largest change due to natural increase. The population in the Mohawk Valley declined slightly because the number of deaths exceeded the number of births.
• There are a few years where 1 or 2 regions saw a natural decrease – more deaths than births
• New York State’s natural increase at the end of the period was smaller than at the beginning of the period. The same can be said for most of the regions.
• The charts in Appendix C and D show that in most regions the decline in natural increase is mostly due to a decrease in births, some regions also start to see a slow increase in the mortality.
![Page 7: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Components of change: Net Migration Net Migration is the difference between the number of people moving into an area and the number of people moving out. The people either move between the area and another place in the United States (Domestic Migration) or another place abroad (International Migration).
Relative small difference in one of the flows in or out of an area is magnified when we look at the net numbers, because of the net being close to zero. This makes it hard to extract trends out of the net numbers.
Even if there seems to be a trend in the net migration, it is impossible to know if this is due to a change in the number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out.
Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration by Economic Region (2010-2017)
Highlights:
• At the State level the number of people moving out since 2010 exceeds the number of people moving in with 152,501 resulting in a negative change of -0.8% of the population.
• The North Country lost relative most people due to migration (-4.4%). The Southern Tier, Central New York and the Mohawk Valley also lost more than 2% due to more people moving out than moving in.
• The estimates for the last year of net migration was higher than the previous 2 years for all regions except New York City. The estimates don’t tell us if this is because more people are arriving or less people leaving, but general trends are that more people stay in their home.1
1 See: https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2017/mover-rates.html
![Page 8: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Net Domestic Migration and Net International Migration
Net domestic migration is the difference between the size of the group of people moving into an area from elsewhere in the United States and the size of the group leaving the area to elsewhere in the United States. Net International Migration is defined similar with flows between the area and origins and destinations outside the US. Somebody that moves to the area from abroad and subsequently moves to elsewhere in the US is counted positively in the Net International Migration and negatively in the Net Domestic Migration.
Table 3: Estimated Net Domestic and International Migration since 2010 by Economic Region
Net migration between 2010 and 2017
Total net migration Net Domestic Migration Net International Migration
Census 2010 Count % Count Rate Count Rate
New York State 19,378,110 -152,501 -0.8% -1,022,071 -5.3% 869,570 4.5%
Capital Region 1,079,201 3,012 0.3% -16,678 -1.5% 19,690 1.8%
Central New York 791,913 -21,973 -2.8% -37,149 -4.7% 15,176 1.9%
Finger Lakes 1,217,041 -20,584 -1.7% -43,886 -3.6% 23,302 1.9%
Long Island 2,833,066 -21,969 -0.8% -89,626 -3.2% 67,657 2.4%
Mid-Hudson 2,290,846 -15,513 -0.7% -79,380 -3.5% 63,867 2.8%
Mohawk Valley 500,138 -11,100 -2.2% -18,778 -3.8% 7,678 1.5%
New York City 8,174,959 -15,299 -0.2% -639,566 -7.8% 624,267 7.6%
North Country 433,188 -19,201 -4.4% -25,905 -6.0% 6,704 1.5%
Southern Tier 657,975 -19,285 -2.9% -32,119 -4.9% 12,834 2.0%
Western New York 1,399,783 -10,589 -0.8% -38,984 -2.8% 28,395 2.0%
Highlights:
• Since 2010 New York State gained 869,750 residents from more people moving in from abroad than moving out to destinations outside the US. Over the same period 1,022,071 more people moved out to another state than arrived from another state.
• All regions saw a negative net domestic migration with the biggest net losses in New York City.
• All regions saw a positive net international migration with the biggest net gains in New York City.
• Only in the Capital region gains from the net international migration exceeded the loss of net domestic migration.
• Appendix C and D shows charts with net migration trends since 2000 and split out by domestic migration and international migration. In most regions the net domestic migration shows a downwards trend in recent years.
• Appendix C and D show that most trend lines for international net-migration show a bit of a jump from 2010 to 2011. This is due to the availability of Census 2010 data and recent method changes.
![Page 9: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Counties
Appendix A has two maps: a map of the percentage population growth since 2010 in each county and a map of last year’s differences. Appendix B has two tables: a table with the estimates, the change between 2010 and 2017 and between 2016 and 2017, the other table contains estimates of the total size of the components of change.
Highlights:
• 45 counties lost population between 2010 and 2017, 17 counties gained population. • Kings County [Brooklyn] was the county with the largest numeric increases since 2010. It added 144,065
residents. Bronx County was the fastest growing (6.2%). • Kings (5.8%), Queens (5.7%), and Rockland (5.5%) follow the Bronx as the relative fastest growing
counties. • Numerically the 4 of the top 5 growing counties since Census 2010 were all in New York City; Following
Kings are Queens (128,037), Bronx (86,366) and New York County [Manhattan] (78,543). • Hamilton was the county that relatively lost the most population (-7.4%), followed by Delaware (-6.2%),
Chenango (-5.2%), and Tioga (-4.8%). • Numerically Broome lost the most residents ( -7,050). Broome is followed by Chautauqua (-5,858) and
Niagara (-5,159). • The change in the last year should be handled with care as revisions might change the conclusions. One
can also not extrapolate trends from just one year of data. That said, the estimated change between 2016 and 2017 show a population loss in 37 counties. The biggest numeric gain in Nassau (3,657), the biggest numeric drop in Kings [Brooklyn] (-2,088). Saratoga showed the biggest percentage gain (1.0%), Hamilton had the biggest percentage drop (-1.8%).
• In 20 counties, the number of deaths between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2017 exceeded the number of births; they have a negative natural increase. Hamilton lost 4.0% of their population due to this negative natural increase.
• Jefferson and Kings [Brooklyn] gained 7.5% and 7.4% of their population because of their number of births exceeding the number of deaths.
• For 9 counties, it is estimated that there were more people moving in than moving out between 2010 and 2016. The relative largest surplus was in Saratoga (3.2%) and Ontario (1.8%).
• The relative largest negative net migrations were in Jefferson (-9.4%) and Tioga (-5.6%).
![Page 10: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Appendix A: Maps
Map 1: Map of estimated % population change between April 2010 and July 2016
![Page 11: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Map 2: Map of estimated % population change between July 2015 and July 2016
![Page 12: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Appendix B: Vintage 2017 Population Estimates and components of change by County
Table 4: Population change by County
Estimates Change between 2010-2017 Change between 2016 and 2017
Census 2010 Estimate 2016 Estimate 2017 Count % Rank Count % Rank
New York 19,378,110 19,836,286 19,849,399 471,289 2.4% 13,113 0.1% Albany 304,196 309,080 309,612 5,416 1.8% 12 532 0.2% 13 Allegany 48,919 47,110 46,894 -2,025 -4.1% 56 -216 -0.5% 50 Bronx 1,384,794 1,468,976 1,471,160 86,366 6.2% 1 2,184 0.1% 17 Broome 200,689 194,830 193,639 -7,050 -3.5% 48 -1,191 -0.6% 55 Cattaraugus 80,343 77,761 77,348 -2,995 -3.7% 52 -413 -0.5% 51 Cayuga 80,003 77,757 77,603 -2,400 -3.0% 41 -154 -0.2% 35 Chautauqua 134,904 129,638 129,046 -5,858 -4.3% 57 -592 -0.5% 49 Chemung 88,841 86,040 85,557 -3,284 -3.7% 51 -483 -0.6% 52 Chenango 50,507 48,323 47,863 -2,644 -5.2% 60 -460 -1.0% 61 Clinton 82,131 80,973 80,980 -1,151 -1.4% 23 7 0.0% 25 Columbia 63,066 61,010 60,604 -2,462 -3.9% 53 -406 -0.7% 57 Cortland 49,285 47,934 47,786 -1,499 -3.0% 42 -148 -0.3% 41 Delaware 47,960 45,425 45,001 -2,959 -6.2% 61 -424 -0.9% 60 Dutchess 297,448 294,567 295,568 -1,880 -0.6% 21 1,001 0.3% 6 Erie 919,130 923,116 925,528 6,398 0.7% 14 2,412 0.3% 10 Essex 39,361 38,014 37,956 -1,405 -3.6% 50 -58 -0.2% 34 Franklin 51,606 51,139 51,116 -490 -0.9% 22 -23 -0.0% 28 Fulton 55,523 53,696 53,877 -1,646 -3.0% 39 181 0.3% 7 Genesee 59,944 58,163 57,956 -1,988 -3.3% 44 -207 -0.4% 43 Greene 49,218 47,516 47,470 -1,748 -3.6% 49 -46 -0.1% 32 Hamilton 4,843 4,566 4,485 -358 -7.4% 62 -81 -1.8% 62 Herkimer 64,463 62,479 62,240 -2,223 -3.4% 46 -239 -0.4% 46 Jefferson 116,232 114,084 114,187 -2,045 -1.8% 27 103 0.1% 20 Kings 2,504,706 2,650,859 2,648,771 144,065 5.8% 2 -2,088 -0.1% 30 Lewis 27,074 26,646 26,551 -523 -1.9% 30 -95 -0.4% 44 Livingston 65,214 64,202 63,799 -1,415 -2.2% 34 -403 -0.6% 56 Madison 73,452 71,389 70,965 -2,487 -3.4% 45 -424 -0.6% 54 Monroe 744,402 747,326 747,642 3,240 0.4% 16 316 0.0% 21 Montgomery 50,256 49,266 49,258 -998 -2.0% 31 -8 -0.0% 27 Nassau 1,339,866 1,365,857 1,369,514 29,648 2.2% 11 3,657 0.3% 9 New York 1,586,184 1,662,164 1,664,727 78,543 5.0% 5 2,563 0.2% 15 Niagara 216,487 211,798 211,328 -5,159 -2.4% 35 -470 -0.2% 36 Oneida 234,885 231,273 231,332 -3,553 -1.5% 24 59 0.0% 22 Onondaga 467,069 466,635 465,398 -1,671 -0.4% 20 -1,237 -0.3% 37 Ontario 108,085 109,586 109,899 1,814 1.7% 13 313 0.3% 8 Orange 372,827 379,915 382,226 9,399 2.5% 9 2,311 0.6% 3 Orleans 42,876 41,292 40,983 -1,893 -4.4% 58 -309 -0.7% 58 Oswego 122,104 118,907 118,478 -3,626 -3.0% 40 -429 -0.4% 45 Otsego 62,272 60,343 60,094 -2,178 -3.5% 47 -249 -0.4% 48 Putnam 99,648 99,107 99,323 -325 -0.3% 19 216 0.2% 12 Queens 2,230,545 2,356,044 2,358,582 128,037 5.7% 3 2,538 0.1% 19 Rensselaer 159,443 159,736 159,722 279 0.2% 17 -14 -0.0% 26 Richmond 468,730 477,383 479,458 10,728 2.3% 10 2,075 0.4% 4 Rockland 311,690 326,875 328,868 17,178 5.5% 4 1,993 0.6% 2 St. Lawrence 111,941 109,989 109,623 -2,318 -2.1% 32 -366 -0.3% 42 Saratoga 219,591 227,560 229,869 10,278 4.7% 6 2,309 1.0% 1 Schenectady 154,751 154,972 155,565 814 0.5% 15 593 0.4% 5 Schoharie 32,739 31,453 31,420 -1,319 -4.0% 55 -33 -0.1% 33 Schuyler 18,350 17,998 18,000 -350 -1.9% 29 2 0.0% 24 Seneca 35,244 34,781 34,498 -746 -2.1% 33 -283 -0.8% 59 Steuben 98,986 96,830 96,281 -2,705 -2.7% 38 -549 -0.6% 53 Suffolk 1,493,200 1,494,334 1,492,953 -247 -0.0% 18 -1,381 -0.1% 31 Sullivan 77,520 75,370 75,485 -2,035 -2.6% 37 115 0.2% 16 Tioga 51,048 48,778 48,578 -2,470 -4.8% 59 -200 -0.4% 47 Tompkins 101,594 104,561 104,802 3,208 3.2% 8 241 0.2% 11 Ulster 182,512 179,546 179,417 -3,095 -1.7% 26 -129 -0.1% 29 Warren 65,698 64,519 64,532 -1,166 -1.8% 28 13 0.0% 23 Washington 63,238 61,806 61,620 -1,618 -2.6% 36 -186 -0.3% 40 Wayne 93,751 90,924 90,670 -3,081 -3.3% 43 -254 -0.3% 39 Westchester 949,201 978,604 980,244 31,043 3.3% 7 1,640 0.2% 14 Wyoming 42,162 40,439 40,493 -1,669 -4.0% 54 54 0.1% 18 Yates 25,363 25,022 24,955 -408 -1.6% 25 -67 -0.3% 38
![Page 13: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Table 5: Components of change by County (totals 2010-2017)
Change between 2010 and 2017 Difference Due to Natural Increase Due to Net migration
Census 2010 Estimate 2017 Count % Rank Count % Rank Count % Rank
New York 19,378,110 19,849,399 471,289 2.4% 625,484 3.2% -152,501 -0.8% Albany 304,196 309,612 5,416 1.8% 12 3,242 1.1% 21 2,325 0.8% 5 Allegany 48,919 46,894 -2,025 -4.1% 56 247 0.5% 34 -2,293 -4.7% 60 Bronx 1,384,794 1,471,160 86,366 6.2% 1 87,250 6.3% 4 -1,853 -0.1% 10 Broome 200,689 193,639 -7,050 -3.5% 48 -483 -0.2% 48 -6,615 -3.3% 41 Cattaraugus 80,343 77,348 -2,995 -3.7% 52 562 0.7% 29 -3,578 -4.5% 57 Cayuga 80,003 77,603 -2,400 -3.0% 41 120 0.1% 41 -2,516 -3.1% 40 Chautauqua 134,904 129,046 -5,858 -4.3% 57 -192 -0.1% 46 -5,690 -4.2% 53 Chemung 88,841 85,557 -3,284 -3.7% 51 344 0.4% 36 -3,627 -4.1% 52 Chenango 50,507 47,863 -2,644 -5.2% 60 -332 -0.7% 53 -2,316 -4.6% 59 Clinton 82,131 80,980 -1,151 -1.4% 23 529 0.6% 31 -1,683 -2.0% 28 Columbia 63,066 60,604 -2,462 -3.9% 53 -987 -1.6% 59 -1,446 -2.3% 33 Cortland 49,285 47,786 -1,499 -3.0% 42 241 0.5% 35 -1,740 -3.5% 46 Delaware 47,960 45,001 -2,959 -6.2% 61 -1,059 -2.2% 61 -1,887 -3.9% 51 Dutchess 297,448 295,568 -1,880 -0.6% 21 1,956 0.7% 30 -3,839 -1.3% 17 Erie 919,130 925,528 6,398 0.7% 14 2,369 0.3% 39 4,617 0.5% 9 Essex 39,361 37,956 -1,405 -3.6% 50 -589 -1.5% 58 -810 -2.1% 29 Franklin 51,606 51,116 -490 -0.9% 22 324 0.6% 32 -831 -1.6% 21 Fulton 55,523 53,877 -1,646 -3.0% 39 -486 -0.9% 55 -1,149 -2.1% 31 Genesee 59,944 57,956 -1,988 -3.3% 44 -171 -0.3% 49 -1,813 -3.0% 39 Greene 49,218 47,470 -1,748 -3.6% 49 -794 -1.6% 60 -939 -1.9% 26 Hamilton 4,843 4,485 -358 -7.4% 62 -194 -4.0% 62 -162 -3.3% 43 Herkimer 64,463 62,240 -2,223 -3.4% 46 -293 -0.5% 50 -1,918 -3.0% 38 Jefferson 116,232 114,187 -2,045 -1.8% 27 8,669 7.5% 1 -10,901 -9.4% 62 Kings 2,504,706 2,648,771 144,065 5.8% 2 185,409 7.4% 2 -40,797 -1.6% 22 Lewis 27,074 26,551 -523 -1.9% 30 539 2.0% 10 -1,064 -3.9% 50 Livingston 65,214 63,799 -1,415 -2.2% 34 -4 -0.0% 43 -1,401 -2.1% 32 Madison 73,452 70,965 -2,487 -3.4% 45 376 0.5% 33 -2,874 -3.9% 49 Monroe 744,402 747,642 3,240 0.4% 16 12,994 1.7% 13 -9,641 -1.3% 18 Montgomery 50,256 49,258 -998 -2.0% 31 184 0.4% 37 -1,177 -2.3% 34 Nassau 1,339,866 1,369,514 29,648 2.2% 11 23,531 1.8% 12 6,741 0.5% 8 New York 1,586,184 1,664,727 78,543 5.0% 5 61,606 3.9% 7 17,213 1.1% 4 Niagara 216,487 211,328 -5,159 -2.4% 35 -1,405 -0.6% 52 -3,645 -1.7% 23 Oneida 234,885 231,332 -3,553 -1.5% 24 530 0.2% 40 -4,082 -1.7% 24 Onondaga 467,069 465,398 -1,671 -0.4% 20 7,969 1.7% 15 -9,638 -2.1% 30 Ontario 108,085 109,899 1,814 1.7% 13 -70 -0.1% 44 1,980 1.8% 2 Orange 372,827 382,226 9,399 2.5% 9 16,280 4.4% 6 -6,977 -1.9% 25 Orleans 42,876 40,983 -1,893 -4.4% 58 38 0.1% 42 -1,944 -4.5% 58 Oswego 122,104 118,478 -3,626 -3.0% 40 1,555 1.3% 19 -5,205 -4.3% 55 Otsego 62,272 60,094 -2,178 -3.5% 47 -549 -0.9% 56 -1,616 -2.6% 36 Putnam 99,648 99,323 -325 -0.3% 19 1,057 1.1% 22 -1,377 -1.4% 19 Queens 2,230,545 2,358,582 128,037 5.7% 3 115,142 5.2% 5 12,550 0.6% 7 Rensselaer 159,443 159,722 279 0.2% 17 1,122 0.7% 28 -761 -0.5% 11 Richmond 468,730 479,458 10,728 2.3% 10 13,264 2.8% 8 -2,412 -0.5% 12 Rockland 311,690 328,868 17,178 5.5% 4 20,449 6.6% 3 -3,306 -1.1% 15 St. Lawrence 111,941 109,623 -2,318 -2.1% 32 1,423 1.3% 20 -3,750 -3.3% 44 Saratoga 219,591 229,869 10,278 4.7% 6 3,363 1.5% 16 7,052 3.2% 1 Schenectady 154,751 155,565 814 0.5% 15 2,136 1.4% 18 -1,238 -0.8% 14 Schoharie 32,739 31,420 -1,319 -4.0% 55 -170 -0.5% 51 -1,158 -3.5% 47 Schuyler 18,350 18,000 -350 -1.9% 29 -125 -0.7% 54 -225 -1.2% 16 Seneca 35,244 34,498 -746 -2.1% 33 311 0.9% 25 -1,046 -3.0% 37 Steuben 98,986 96,281 -2,705 -2.7% 38 761 0.8% 26 -3,451 -3.5% 45 Suffolk 1,493,200 1,492,953 -247 -0.0% 18 28,556 1.9% 11 -28,710 -1.9% 27 Sullivan 77,520 75,485 -2,035 -2.6% 37 764 1.0% 24 -2,835 -3.7% 48 Tioga 51,048 48,578 -2,470 -4.8% 59 369 0.7% 27 -2,855 -5.6% 61 Tompkins 101,594 104,802 3,208 3.2% 8 1,463 1.4% 17 1,691 1.7% 3 Ulster 182,512 179,417 -3,095 -1.7% 26 -429 -0.2% 47 -2,619 -1.4% 20 Warren 65,698 64,532 -1,166 -1.8% 28 -688 -1.0% 57 -433 -0.7% 13 Washington 63,238 61,620 -1,618 -2.6% 36 -48 -0.1% 45 -1,548 -2.4% 35 Wayne 93,751 90,670 -3,081 -3.3% 43 983 1.0% 23 -4,085 -4.4% 56 Westchester 949,201 980,244 31,043 3.3% 7 25,975 2.7% 9 5,440 0.6% 6 Wyoming 42,162 40,493 -1,669 -4.0% 54 112 0.3% 38 -1,791 -4.2% 54 Yates 25,363 24,955 -408 -1.6% 25 438 1.7% 14 -843 -3.3% 42
![Page 14: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Appendix C: New York State trends Population trends – New York State
Table 6: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 19,001,780
2001 19,082,838 81,058 0.4% 256,446 157,292 99,154 -165,566 120,585 -44,981
2002 19,137,800 54,962 0.3% 251,987 158,630 93,357 -176,057 109,272 -66,785
2003 19,175,939 38,139 0.2% 252,301 156,009 96,292 -178,262 90,173 -88,089
2004 19,171,567 -4,372 -0.0% 252,899 154,749 98,150 -213,794 81,886 -131,908
2005 19,132,610 -38,957 -0.2% 247,192 152,918 94,274 -246,933 81,991 -164,942
2006 19,104,631 -27,979 -0.1% 245,932 146,725 99,207 -245,277 84,261 -161,016
2007 19,132,335 27,704 0.1% 253,150 149,018 104,132 -183,585 75,013 -108,572
2008 19,212,436 80,101 0.4% 252,435 148,375 104,060 -131,085 72,070 -59,015
2009 19,307,066 94,630 0.5% 247,469 154,409 93,060 -98,886 63,634 -35,252
2010 19,405,185 98,119 0.5% 242,092 158,228 83,864 -91,634 62,223 -29,411
2011 19,526,372 121,187 0.6% 243,111 149,748 93,363 -82,689 110,909 28,220
2012 19,625,409 99,037 0.5% 239,922 146,899 93,023 -106,645 112,960 6,315
2013 19,712,514 87,105 0.4% 239,872 152,560 87,312 -112,882 113,188 306
2014 19,773,580 61,066 0.3% 237,032 148,769 88,263 -145,416 118,272 -27,144
2015 19,819,347 45,767 0.2% 239,354 153,835 85,519 -168,627 128,633 -39,994
2016 19,836,286 16,939 0.1% 234,754 156,143 78,611 -192,976 131,213 -61,763
2017 19,849,399 13,113 0.1% 232,766 159,676 73,090 -190,508 130,411 -60,097
Figure 5: Estimated population trend
Census 200018,977,026
Census 201019,378,110
2017 Estimate19,849,399
18,400,000
18,600,000
18,800,000
19,000,000
19,200,000
19,400,000
19,600,000
19,800,000
20,000,000
![Page 15: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – New York State
Figure 6: Change in population and components of change
Figure 7: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 8: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-200,000
-150,000
-100,000
-50,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-300,000
-250,000
-200,000
-150,000
-100,000
-50,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Domestic
International
![Page 16: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Population trends – Capital Region
Table 7: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 1,031,167
2001 1,034,717 3,550 0.3% 11,411 9,870 1,541 -54 1,416 1,362
2002 1,041,253 6,536 0.6% 11,310 9,818 1,492 2,961 1,230 4,191
2003 1,050,251 8,998 0.9% 11,624 9,727 1,897 5,260 847 6,107
2004 1,057,329 7,078 0.7% 11,499 9,839 1,660 3,202 1,090 4,292
2005 1,062,603 5,274 0.5% 11,398 9,784 1,614 1,519 970 2,489
2006 1,068,969 6,366 0.6% 11,460 9,340 2,120 1,956 1,069 3,025
2007 1,071,935 2,966 0.3% 11,618 9,512 2,106 -1,190 897 -293
2008 1,075,212 3,277 0.3% 11,279 9,519 1,760 -684 888 204
2009 1,077,751 2,539 0.2% 11,252 9,774 1,478 -1,054 770 -284
2010 1,079,644 1,893 0.2% 10,889 9,871 1,018 -1,410 800 -610
2011 1,080,770 1,126 0.1% 11,061 9,843 1,218 -2,304 2,307 3
2012 1,083,003 2,233 0.2% 11,081 9,801 1,280 -1,504 2,595 1,091
2013 1,085,127 2,124 0.2% 11,142 9,852 1,290 -1,696 2,597 901
2014 1,085,726 599 0.1% 10,992 9,701 1,291 -3,358 2,764 -594
2015 1,085,987 261 0.0% 10,831 10,281 550 -3,206 2,989 -217
2016 1,086,199 212 0.0% 10,694 9,957 737 -3,517 3,000 -517
2017 1,088,994 2,795 0.3% 10,622 10,187 435 -517 2,901 2,384
Figure 9: Estimated population trend
Census 20001,029,822
Census 20101,079,201 2017 Estimate
1,088,994
1,000,000
1,010,000
1,020,000
1,030,000
1,040,000
1,050,000
1,060,000
1,070,000
1,080,000
1,090,000
1,100,000
![Page 17: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – Capital Region
Figure 10: Change in population and components of change
Figure 11: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 12: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Domestic
International
![Page 18: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Population trends – Central New York
Table 8: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 780,525
2001 780,913 388 0.0% 9,546 6,835 2,711 -4,644 1,145 -3,499
2002 782,533 1,620 0.2% 9,281 6,831 2,450 -3,051 1,006 -2,045
2003 785,961 3,428 0.4% 9,074 6,888 2,186 -838 783 -55
2004 787,061 1,100 0.1% 9,133 6,837 2,296 -3,344 775 -2,569
2005 785,455 -1,606 -0.2% 8,991 6,895 2,096 -5,885 727 -5,158
2006 785,662 207 0.0% 8,791 6,720 2,071 -4,041 801 -3,240
2007 786,462 800 0.1% 9,126 6,853 2,273 -3,619 695 -2,924
2008 788,932 2,470 0.3% 8,912 6,685 2,227 -1,819 694 -1,125
2009 790,387 1,455 0.2% 8,875 6,829 2,046 -2,694 579 -2,115
2010 792,320 1,933 0.2% 8,383 6,927 1,456 -1,637 571 -1,066
2011 791,832 -488 -0.1% 8,617 7,020 1,597 -3,856 1,755 -2,101
2012 790,088 -1,744 -0.2% 8,733 6,919 1,814 -5,485 1,890 -3,595
2013 790,985 897 0.1% 8,637 7,137 1,500 -2,575 2,011 -564
2014 789,267 -1,718 -0.2% 8,358 7,034 1,324 -5,251 2,188 -3,063
2015 786,463 -2,804 -0.4% 8,471 7,396 1,075 -6,218 2,311 -3,907
2016 782,622 -3,841 -0.5% 8,214 7,083 1,131 -7,319 2,339 -4,980
2017 780,230 -2,392 -0.3% 8,091 6,948 1,143 -5,873 2,325 -3,548
Figure 13: Estimated population trend
Census 2000780,747
Census 2010791,913
2017 Estimate780,230
774,000
776,000
778,000
780,000
782,000
784,000
786,000
788,000
790,000
792,000
794,000
![Page 19: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – Central New York
Figure 14: Change in population and components of change
Figure 15: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 16: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-6,000
-5,000
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Domestic
International
![Page 20: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Population trends – Finger Lakes
Table 9: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 1,203,763
2001 1,206,361 2,598 0.2% 14,456 10,485 3,971 -4,840 1,958 -2,882
2002 1,208,697 2,336 0.2% 13,970 10,381 3,589 -4,635 1,767 -2,868
2003 1,210,497 1,800 0.1% 14,177 10,481 3,696 -5,032 1,429 -3,603
2004 1,210,882 385 0.0% 13,781 10,542 3,239 -5,924 1,294 -4,630
2005 1,208,443 -2,439 -0.2% 13,431 10,509 2,922 -8,397 1,261 -7,136
2006 1,208,185 -258 -0.0% 13,658 9,929 3,729 -7,295 1,429 -5,866
2007 1,209,954 1,769 0.1% 13,973 10,361 3,612 -4,919 1,247 -3,672
2008 1,212,848 2,894 0.2% 13,754 10,268 3,486 -3,829 1,247 -2,582
2009 1,215,395 2,547 0.2% 13,324 10,516 2,808 -3,475 1,062 -2,413
2010 1,217,621 2,226 0.2% 13,058 10,675 2,383 -3,410 1,047 -2,363
2011 1,219,350 1,729 0.1% 13,386 10,854 2,532 -3,626 2,881 -745
2012 1,219,559 209 0.0% 13,003 10,862 2,141 -4,878 2,992 -1,886
2013 1,219,576 17 0.0% 13,122 10,962 2,160 -5,150 3,017 -2,133
2014 1,217,642 -1,934 -0.2% 12,885 10,769 2,116 -7,305 3,244 -4,061
2015 1,214,744 -2,898 -0.2% 13,047 11,360 1,687 -8,055 3,467 -4,588
2016 1,211,735 -3,009 -0.2% 12,658 10,991 1,667 -8,235 3,559 -4,676
2017 1,210,895 -840 -0.1% 12,578 11,041 1,537 -5,915 3,541 -2,374
Figure 17: Estimated population trend
Census 20001,199,851
Census 20101,217,041
2017 Estimate1,210,895
1,185,000
1,190,000
1,195,000
1,200,000
1,205,000
1,210,000
1,215,000
1,220,000
1,225,000
![Page 21: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – Finger Lakes
Figure 18: Change in population and components of change
Figure 19: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 20: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-10,000
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Domestic
International
![Page 22: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Population trends – Long Island
Table 10: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 2,760,794
2001 2,779,574 18,780 0.7% 36,925 22,500 14,425 -8,843 8,726 -117
2002 2,796,317 16,743 0.6% 36,013 23,140 12,873 -8,887 7,933 -954
2003 2,810,610 14,293 0.5% 36,189 22,810 13,379 -10,633 6,537 -4,096
2004 2,816,179 5,569 0.2% 35,907 22,523 13,384 -18,826 5,764 -13,062
2005 2,810,005 -6,174 -0.2% 34,500 21,895 12,605 -30,052 5,876 -24,176
2006 2,800,531 -9,474 -0.3% 34,156 21,502 12,654 -33,742 5,946 -27,796
2007 2,797,303 -3,228 -0.1% 34,258 21,712 12,546 -26,453 5,259 -21,194
2008 2,805,347 8,044 0.3% 33,321 21,558 11,763 -14,462 4,952 -9,510
2009 2,819,294 13,947 0.5% 33,379 23,115 10,264 -6,466 4,320 -2,146
2010 2,836,592 17,298 0.6% 33,407 24,647 8,760 -1,433 4,122 2,689
2011 2,847,557 10,965 0.4% 30,769 22,481 8,288 -5,760 8,628 2,868
2012 2,851,403 3,846 0.1% 30,227 22,206 8,021 -12,997 8,833 -4,164
2013 2,857,517 6,114 0.2% 29,398 23,340 6,058 -8,651 8,858 207
2014 2,861,341 3,824 0.1% 29,786 22,225 7,561 -12,749 9,085 -3,664
2015 2,861,805 464 0.0% 30,071 22,958 7,113 -16,609 9,991 -6,618
2016 2,860,191 -1,614 -0.1% 30,073 23,488 6,585 -18,440 10,228 -8,212
2017 2,862,467 2,276 0.1% 29,689 23,998 5,691 -13,562 10,147 -3,415
Figure 21: Estimated population trend
Census 20002,754,004
Census 20102,833,066
2017 Estimate2,862,467
2,680,000
2,700,000
2,720,000
2,740,000
2,760,000
2,780,000
2,800,000
2,820,000
2,840,000
2,860,000
2,880,000
![Page 23: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – Long Island
Figure 22: Change in population and components of change
Figure 23: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 24: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-40,000
-30,000
-20,000
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-40,000
-35,000
-30,000
-25,000
-20,000
-15,000
-10,000
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Domestic
International
![Page 24: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Population trends – Mid-Hudson
Table 11: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 2,185,030
2001 2,204,214 19,184 0.9% 29,519 17,298 12,221 -4,240 10,080 5,840
2002 2,222,465 18,251 0.8% 29,130 17,379 11,751 -3,856 9,037 5,181
2003 2,236,884 14,419 0.6% 29,594 17,074 12,520 -6,897 7,193 296
2004 2,246,392 9,508 0.4% 29,829 17,154 12,675 -12,015 7,206 -4,809
2005 2,249,815 3,423 0.2% 28,815 16,532 12,283 -17,742 7,028 -10,714
2006 2,251,869 2,054 0.1% 28,715 16,068 12,647 -19,896 7,297 -12,599
2007 2,259,128 7,259 0.3% 29,134 16,545 12,589 -13,432 6,355 -7,077
2008 2,269,796 10,668 0.5% 28,897 16,483 12,414 -9,921 6,151 -3,770
2009 2,281,770 11,974 0.5% 28,037 17,354 10,683 -6,150 5,376 -774
2010 2,294,356 12,586 0.6% 27,348 17,881 9,467 -5,306 5,302 -4
2011 2,305,783 11,427 0.5% 26,705 16,925 9,780 -6,895 8,639 1,744
2012 2,310,288 4,505 0.2% 26,157 16,705 9,452 -13,395 8,352 -5,043
2013 2,319,436 9,148 0.4% 25,948 17,504 8,444 -7,359 8,176 817
2014 2,324,188 4,752 0.2% 25,952 16,821 9,131 -12,785 8,417 -4,368
2015 2,329,172 4,984 0.2% 26,842 17,258 9,584 -13,893 9,305 -4,588
2016 2,333,984 4,812 0.2% 26,507 17,856 8,651 -13,359 9,503 -3,856
2017 2,341,131 7,147 0.3% 26,305 18,383 7,922 -10,230 9,461 -769
Figure 25: Estimated population trend
Census 20002,179,186
Census 20102,290,846
2017 Estimate2,341,131
2,050,000
2,100,000
2,150,000
2,200,000
2,250,000
2,300,000
2,350,000
2,400,000
![Page 25: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – Mid-Hudson
Figure 26: Change in population and components of change
Figure 27: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 28: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-15,000
-10,000
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-25,000
-20,000
-15,000
-10,000
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Domestic
International
![Page 26: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Population trends – Mohawk Valley
Table 12: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 497,552
2001 496,615 -937 -0.2% 5,201 5,511 -310 -2,148 799 -1,349
2002 496,213 -402 -0.1% 5,225 5,557 -332 -1,517 675 -842
2003 497,452 1,239 0.2% 5,297 5,382 -85 5 511 516
2004 498,923 1,471 0.3% 5,299 5,489 -190 265 523 788
2005 498,983 60 0.0% 5,238 5,226 12 -1,318 470 -848
2006 499,003 20 0.0% 5,189 5,203 -14 -1,419 528 -891
2007 499,926 923 0.2% 5,433 5,064 369 -829 455 -374
2008 499,872 -54 -0.0% 5,302 5,170 132 -1,626 462 -1,164
2009 499,615 -257 -0.1% 5,184 5,265 -81 -1,539 384 -1,155
2010 499,981 366 0.1% 4,869 5,138 -269 -515 394 -121
2011 498,358 -1,623 -0.3% 5,235 5,234 1 -2,528 898 -1,630
2012 496,727 -1,631 -0.3% 5,229 5,139 90 -2,657 935 -1,722
2013 495,370 -1,357 -0.3% 5,242 5,465 -223 -2,137 1,018 -1,119
2014 493,067 -2,303 -0.5% 5,206 5,112 94 -3,527 1,113 -2,414
2015 490,250 -2,817 -0.6% 5,087 5,461 -374 -3,610 1,156 -2,454
2016 488,510 -1,740 -0.4% 4,986 5,182 -196 -2,728 1,192 -1,536
2017 488,221 -289 -0.1% 4,938 5,158 -220 -1,235 1,179 -56
Figure 29: Estimated population trend
Census 2000497,888
Census 2010500,138
2017 Estimate488,221
482,000
484,000
486,000
488,000
490,000
492,000
494,000
496,000
498,000
500,000
502,000
![Page 27: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – Mohawk Valley
Figure 30: Change in population and components of change
Figure 31: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 32: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-3,500
-3,000
-2,500
-2,000
-1,500
-1,000
-500
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
4,400
4,600
4,800
5,000
5,200
5,400
5,600
5,800
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Domestic
International
![Page 28: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Population trends – New York City
Table 13: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 8,017,608
2001 8,059,813 42,205 0.5% 120,660 59,249 61,411 -127,011 93,547 -33,464
2002 8,072,000 12,187 0.2% 119,130 60,194 58,936 -146,799 85,543 -61,256
2003 8,068,073 -3,927 -0.0% 118,493 58,190 60,303 -151,725 72,261 -79,464
2004 8,043,366 -24,707 -0.3% 119,850 57,379 62,471 -163,547 62,566 -100,981
2005 8,013,368 -29,998 -0.4% 118,046 56,894 61,152 -170,291 63,806 -106,485
2006 7,993,906 -19,462 -0.2% 117,389 54,242 63,147 -164,370 64,748 -99,622
2007 8,013,775 19,869 0.2% 122,027 54,329 67,698 -122,149 58,385 -63,764
2008 8,068,195 54,420 0.7% 123,531 53,984 69,547 -88,618 55,749 -32,869
2009 8,131,574 63,379 0.8% 121,049 56,836 64,213 -69,841 49,597 -20,244
2010 8,193,703 62,129 0.8% 118,752 58,654 60,098 -70,233 48,204 -22,029
2011 8,292,688 98,985 1.2% 120,503 52,297 68,206 -49,652 80,299 30,647
2012 8,383,504 90,816 1.1% 118,510 50,817 67,693 -57,120 80,447 23,327
2013 8,458,642 75,138 0.9% 119,143 53,233 65,910 -71,782 81,109 9,327
2014 8,521,135 62,493 0.7% 117,033 52,430 64,603 -86,977 84,732 -2,245
2015 8,582,459 61,324 0.7% 117,796 53,409 64,387 -95,366 92,086 -3,280
2016 8,615,426 32,967 0.4% 115,481 56,660 58,821 -120,286 94,367 -25,919
2017 8,622,698 7,272 0.1% 114,605 59,004 55,601 -142,586 94,066 -48,520
Figure 33: Estimated population trend
Census 20008,009,185
Census 20108,174,959
2017 Estimate8,622,698
7,600,000
7,700,000
7,800,000
7,900,000
8,000,000
8,100,000
8,200,000
8,300,000
8,400,000
8,500,000
8,600,000
8,700,000
![Page 29: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – New York City
Figure 34: Change in population and components of change
Figure 35: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 36: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-150,000
-100,000
-50,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-200,000
-150,000
-100,000
-50,000
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Domestic
International
![Page 30: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Population trends – North Country
Table 14: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 425,866
2001 425,320 -546 -0.1% 4,844 3,760 1,084 -3,083 187 -2,896
2002 425,080 -240 -0.1% 4,819 3,781 1,038 -2,321 -325 -2,646
2003 425,406 326 0.1% 4,794 3,720 1,074 -697 -1,315 -2,012
2004 425,506 100 0.0% 4,861 3,706 1,155 -3,202 808 -2,394
2005 429,769 4,263 1.0% 4,832 3,733 1,099 1,598 66 1,664
2006 430,742 973 0.2% 5,054 3,535 1,519 -2,372 461 -1,911
2007 432,411 1,669 0.4% 5,111 3,749 1,362 -1,101 18 -1,083
2008 432,231 -180 -0.0% 5,162 3,715 1,447 -3,134 217 -2,917
2009 432,561 330 0.1% 5,068 3,700 1,368 -2,222 85 -2,137
2010 433,444 883 0.2% 4,584 3,694 890 -1,704 314 -1,390
2011 434,512 1,068 0.2% 5,367 3,686 1,681 -1,186 589 -597
2012 438,320 3,808 0.9% 5,416 3,792 1,624 509 1,645 2,154
2013 434,602 -3,718 -0.8% 5,492 3,782 1,710 -6,520 983 -5,537
2014 433,531 -1,071 -0.2% 5,232 3,603 1,629 -3,560 847 -2,713
2015 428,481 -5,050 -1.2% 5,209 3,761 1,448 -7,714 1,119 -6,595
2016 425,411 -3,070 -0.7% 5,072 3,822 1,250 -5,074 751 -4,323
2017 424,898 -513 -0.1% 4,895 3,965 930 -1,987 552 -1,435
Figure 37: Estimated population trend
Census 2000425,845
Census 2010433,188
2017 Estimate424,898
415,000
420,000
425,000
430,000
435,000
440,000
![Page 31: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – North Country
Figure 38: Change in population and components of change
Figure 39: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 40: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-10,000
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Domestic
International
![Page 32: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Population trends – Southern Tier
Table 15: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 657,076
2001 658,089 1,013 0.2% 7,168 6,456 712 -1,987 1,237 -750
2002 659,903 1,814 0.3% 6,975 6,288 687 -1,114 1,110 -4
2003 659,800 -103 -0.0% 6,916 6,441 475 -2,668 949 -1,719
2004 659,510 -290 -0.0% 6,946 6,306 640 -3,008 862 -2,146
2005 657,660 -1,850 -0.3% 6,792 6,357 435 -4,374 850 -3,524
2006 657,711 51 0.0% 6,578 6,073 505 -2,556 864 -1,692
2007 658,147 436 0.1% 7,070 6,301 769 -2,346 781 -1,565
2008 658,472 325 0.0% 7,021 6,410 611 -2,380 762 -1,618
2009 658,685 213 0.0% 6,465 6,357 108 -1,789 681 -1,108
2010 657,887 -798 -0.1% 6,191 6,196 -5 -3,118 687 -2,431
2011 656,611 -1,276 -0.2% 6,669 6,489 180 -3,070 1,596 -1,474
2012 655,866 -745 -0.1% 6,779 6,287 492 -2,924 1,695 -1,229
2013 654,405 -1,461 -0.2% 6,721 6,408 313 -3,414 1,647 -1,767
2014 651,447 -2,958 -0.5% 6,557 6,375 182 -4,996 1,805 -3,191
2015 647,190 -4,257 -0.7% 6,641 6,695 -54 -6,161 1,913 -4,248
2016 642,785 -4,405 -0.7% 6,184 6,410 -226 -6,105 1,921 -4,184
2017 639,721 -3,064 -0.5% 6,160 6,406 -246 -4,737 1,912 -2,825
Figure 41: Estimated population trend
Census 2000657,023
Census 2010657,975
2017 Estimate639,721
625,000
630,000
635,000
640,000
645,000
650,000
655,000
660,000
665,000
![Page 33: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – Southern Tier
Figure 42: Change in population and components of change
Figure 43: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 44: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-5,000
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
5,4005,6005,8006,0006,2006,4006,6006,8007,0007,2007,400
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-7,000
-6,000
-5,000
-4,000
-3,000
-2,000
-1,000
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Domestic
International
![Page 34: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Population trends – Western New York
Table 16: Population estimates and estimated components of change
Population Change Natural Increase Migration
Year July 1 Population Number Percentage Births Deaths Natural
Increase Domestic International Net-Migration
2000 1,442,399
2001 1,437,222 -5,177 -0.4% 16,716 15,328 1,388 -8,716 1,490 -7,226
2002 1,433,339 -3,883 -0.3% 16,134 15,261 873 -6,838 1,296 -5,542
2003 1,431,005 -2,334 -0.2% 16,143 15,296 847 -5,037 978 -4,059
2004 1,426,419 -4,586 -0.3% 15,794 14,974 820 -7,395 998 -6,397
2005 1,416,509 -9,910 -0.7% 15,149 15,093 56 -11,991 937 -11,054
2006 1,408,053 -8,456 -0.6% 14,942 14,113 829 -11,542 1,118 -10,424
2007 1,403,294 -4,759 -0.3% 15,400 14,592 808 -7,547 921 -6,626
2008 1,401,531 -1,763 -0.1% 15,256 14,583 673 -4,612 948 -3,664
2009 1,400,034 -1,497 -0.1% 14,836 14,663 173 -3,656 780 -2,876
2010 1,399,637 -397 -0.0% 14,611 14,545 66 -2,868 782 -2,086
2011 1,398,911 -726 -0.1% 14,799 14,919 -120 -3,812 3,317 -495
2012 1,396,651 -2,260 -0.2% 14,787 14,371 416 -6,194 3,576 -2,618
2013 1,396,854 203 0.0% 15,027 14,877 150 -3,598 3,772 174
2014 1,396,236 -618 -0.0% 15,031 14,699 332 -4,908 4,077 -831
2015 1,392,796 -3,440 -0.2% 15,359 15,256 103 -7,795 4,296 -3,499
2016 1,389,423 -3,373 -0.2% 14,885 14,694 191 -7,913 4,353 -3,560
2017 1,390,144 721 0.1% 14,883 14,586 297 -3,866 4,327 461
Figure 45: Estimated population trend
Census 20001,443,475
Census 20101,399,783
2017 Estimate1,390,144
1,360,000
1,370,000
1,380,000
1,390,000
1,400,000
1,410,000
1,420,000
1,430,000
1,440,000
1,450,000
![Page 35: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Change in population and components of change – Western New York
Figure 46: Change in population and components of change
Figure 47: Births, Deaths and Natural increase/decrease
Figure 48: Net migration broken out by domestic and international net-migration
-12,000
-10,000
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
Growth
Decline
Natural Increase
Net-Migration
12,500
13,000
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
15,500
16,000
16,500
17,000
Decrease
Increase
Births
Deaths
-14,000
-12,000
-10,000
-8,000
-6,000
-4,000
-2,000
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017Domestic
International
![Page 36: 2017 County and Economic Development Regions Population ......number of people moving in or due to a change in the number of people moving out. Figure 4: Trends in estimated Net Migration](https://reader036.vdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022071109/5fe4a3975d52516916017bd4/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Appendix E: Sources
Data Current Estimates data (Vintage 2016) https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
Intercensal Estimates (population totals, 2000 – 2010) https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/time-series/demo/popest/intercensal-2000-2010-counties.html
Evaluation Estimates (components, 2000-2010) https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/research/evaluation-estimates.html
Methodology Vintage 2016 State and County Population Estimates Methodology
https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology/2010-2017/2017-natstcopr-meth.pdf
More analyses, other publications, projections and additional trends can be found at our web site:
http://pad.human.cornell.edu/