2017 questionnaire students’ opinion 1st year - google forms...gender (11 responses) master format...

11 responses

SUMMARY INDIVIDUAL Accepting responses

Organization in which you are working (11 responses)

Domain in which you are working (11 responses)

Organization name (6 responses)

Piraeus Bank Romania

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Public

Private

NGO

Independent

2 (18.2%)

9 (81.8%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Economical…

IT (software…

Consultancy

Education/pr…

Construction

Public sector

European fo…

Other

1 (9.1%)

5 (45.5%)

3 (27.3%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

1 (9.1%)

2 (18.2%)

2017 Questionnaire students’ opinion 1st year

QUESTIONS RESPONSES 11

2017 Questionnaire students’ opinion 1st year - Google Forms https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1U1FU8Wsg4VR0TJoqw-...

1 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Cameron

Avenir Telecom SA

Occupation/job title: (11 responses)

Full stack programmer

Team Leader Credit Control

Supervisor

PMO Coordinator

Helpdesk

Recruiter

Management Consultant

Project Management OfRcer

Economist

Product Manager

Special Pricing Analyst

Age (10 responses)

Project based experience (11 responses)

22 23 27 30 35 36 370

1

2

3

4

3 (27.3%)

2 (18.2%)

1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%)



2 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Gender (11 responses)

Master format attended (11 responses)

Please evaluate the following general aspects related to Project ManagementMaster program using a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means “highly unsatisRed”and 5 means “Very satisRed” - Courses and seminars unfolding

(11 responses)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

More than 5… 3 (27.3%)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Female

Male

9 (81.8%)

2 (18.2%)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Daily freque…

Low frequen…

11 (100%)

0 (0%)

66 (54.5%)



3 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Please evaluate the following general aspects related to Project ManagementMaster program using a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means “highly unsatisRed”and 5 means “Very satisRed” -Evaluation method

(11 responses)

Please evaluate the following general aspects related to Project ManagementMaster program using a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means “highly unsatisRed”and 5 means “Very satisRed” - Relationship with administrative staff

(11 responses)

Please evaluate the following general aspects related to Project ManagementMaster program using a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means “highly unsatisRed”and 5 means “Very satisRed” - Courses and other material used

(11 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

8

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

2 (18.2%)

7 (63.6%)

2 (18.2%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

5 (45.5%)

4 (36.4%)

2 (18.2%)



4 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Please evaluate the following general aspects related to Project ManagementMaster program using a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means “highly unsatisRed”and 5 means “Very satisRed” - Interaction with lecturers

(11 responses)

Please evaluate the following general aspects related to Project ManagementMaster program using a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 means “highly unsatisRed”and 5 means “Very satisRed” -Interaction with masters’ management

(11 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

0 (0%)

6 (54.5%)

4 (36.4%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

4 (36.4%)

3 (27.3%) 3 (27.3%)



5 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Design and Implementation of EU-funded projects - Courses and seminars(11 responses)

Design and Implementation of EU-funded projects - Course material(11 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%)

6 (54.5%)

3 (27.3%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

2 (18.2%)

6 (54.5%)

2 (18.2%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%)

6 (54.5%)

3 (27.3%)



6 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Design and Implementation of EU-funded projects - Teacher(s)’ performance(11 responses)

Design and Implementation of EU-funded projects - Seminarnotebook/material

(11 responses)

Design and Implementation of EU-funded projects - Teaching methodology(11 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

4 (36.4%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

2 (18.2%)

5 (45.5%)

4 (36.4%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

2 (18.2%)

6 (54.5%)

3 (27.3%)



7 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Design and Implementation of EU-funded projects - Practical exercises(11 responses)

Project Management I - Courses and seminars (11 responses)

Project Management I - Course material (11 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

2

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

3 (27.3%)

4 (36.4%) 4 (36.4%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%)

3 (27.3%)

6 (54.5%)

4

6

2 (18.2%)

4 (36.4%)

5 (45.5%)



8 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Project Management I - Evaluation method (11 responses)

Project Management I - Teacher(s)’ performance (11 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

2 (18.2%)

3 (27.3%)

6 (54.5%)

1 2 3 4 50

5

0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

3 (27.3%)

8 (72.7%)



9 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Project Management I - Teaching methodology (11 responses)

Project Management I - Practical exercises (11 responses)

Globalization and European Integration-Courses and seminars (11 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

0 (0%) 0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

5 (45.5%)

6 (54.5%)

1 2 3 4 50

5

0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

3 (27.3%)

8 (72.7%)

4

65 (45.5%)

4 (36.4%)



10 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Globalization and European Integration-Course material (11 responses)

Globalization and European Integration-Evaluation method (11 responses)

Globalization and European Integration-Teacher(s)’ performance (10 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%)

3 (27.3%)

5 (45.5%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

2 (18.2%)

6 (54.5%)

2 (18.2%)

1 2 3 4 50

5

0 (0%)1 (10%)

0 (0%)1 (10%)

8 (80%)



11 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

(11 responses)

Globalization and European Integration-Teaching methodology (11 responses)

Globalization and European Integration-Practical exercises (11 responses)

1 2 3 4 50

1

2

3

4

1 (9.1%)

2 (18.2%) 2 (18.2%)

3 (27.3%) 3 (27.3%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

8

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%) 1 (9.1%)

7 (63.6%)

2 (18.2%)

1 2 3 4 50

2

4

6

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)

2 (18.2%)

6 (54.5%)

2 (18.2%)



12 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

I found it very useful the fact that the courses have a \uent structure. During 3/4 weeks we are attending the samecourse, this gives the possibility to learn and recap during the period. Even if Project Management has rules and acertain structure, the seminars helped us to apply what we've learned in classes. This Master Program not onlygives the theoretical bases, it also gives the understanding with real cases, examples. It has a great value, it's timewell spent.

-

The opportinity to interract at an academic level with teachers in english.

The interactive teaching methods

The teachers are very well prepared, methodology aligned with the PMI exam.

It is very useful and it is good for structuring the information about PM

Practical side and overall interactions with teachers as courses seem to be very much based on their own practicalexperience

What do you dislike most about Project Management Master program andwould like to change?

(8 responses)

Some subjects are not related to Project Management or it's not clearly stated what is the relationship

From me, the location is not so accessible and I Rnd it hard to be on time at classes. 6pm is inconvenient for me.

-

Some courses do not bring an added value.

SuperRcial materials and information transmitted by teachers ex. Gloalization course as all of the students alreadyknew the subject and it did not explain basic concepts, class materials was insufRciently descriptive of the topics

Too many assignments in the same week/ in the same time period. At one subject, we had to hand over in thesame week individual homework, team project and, also, attend the Rnal exam.

Lack of connection between the subjects - the teachers are not providing the big picture to understand how thesubjects connect to each other. Maybe it would be nice for a very Rrst lecture to have an overview of all the subjectsfor the 2 years and they connection - like a logical matrix - that would give the students further on. Also eachteacher can make an introduction to his/her subject by referring to the other subjects already studied.The powerpoint presentations are really unprofessional - they have spelling mistakes (even in this questionnaire it iswritten European founds), they are not clear, they are not attractive and they are not complete. If you expect highquality from the students you should also provide it otherwise it is a bad example. For example for PM the slidescontained examples that were not correct (actually it was not a model to be followed/used) but the teachers did notmake this clear and did not explain what was wrong/what should be improved - and this is the material that wassent to us and was supposed to guide us in writting the project (so it is better in the slides either to use a verycorrect/good example or to write what is not correct, otherwise it is misleading)Also, if 2 teachers teach the same module they should know very well what the other said as sometimes theycontradicted each other, which led to confusions.For strategic management I found the course extremely short and demending, with an extremely poor time



13 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

Not a knock on the PM program per say but, chairs are HORRIBLE! Also .... grading seems to be rather generous, wecan't all be 8 and 9 material all the way

What other topics do you consider should be included in Project ManagementMaster Program?

(6 responses)

I don't know if there will be a communication related class, Project Management implies many skills or soft skillsand I would deRnitely say that being a good communicator is important in this job.

-

Organization related courses - such as organizational pshy./ Skill development related courses - Excel

A more thorough Rnancial overview applied on project management methodologies, other PM methodologies otherthan PMBook

I cannot answer as I am Rrst year. Maybe after second year ...

Hard to say since Its only been 1 semester

What was the main criteria that in\uenced your decision to attend ProjectManagement Master program?

(11 responses)

Your recommendation for Project Management Master program: (7 responses)

a) International accreditation offeredby PMI Global Accreditation Center?b) Opportunity to become a certified…c) Teachers and specialists that are…d) Practical applications used durin…e) Opportunity of getting involved in…f) The way courses and seminars ar…g) Acquaintances/colleagues recom…h) Low scholarship fees?Other

18.2%

9.1%

36.4%

36.4%



14 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

An overall positive recommendation.

a more structured course materials, the classes are too condensed and make it hard to understand the topics andcomplete the tasks in due time - this leads to superRcial understanding and low grades. I do not support themodule sistem and would prefer a clasic courses as it gives you time to absorb the knowledge

Need for better presentations and syllabusses, more theoretical material provided (there are students that had noconnection to PM before and they are lost - the ppt is really not enough for them) - maybe in the Rrst lecture of eachcourse 1 slide should be about the 1-2 book(s) we should read for that course, better facilities - the room is not bigenough sometimes, it is no air in the room and it is either too cold or too hot, it is dirty etc

I am having a hard time recommending since that would imply my actually knowing more than I do about thisdiscipline ... respectfully though ... Strategic Management had a direct effect on how hard i hit the gym after classes...

Are you interested in obtaining an international certiRcation in projectmanagement? (CAPM or PMP)?

(11 responses)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

YES

NO

10 (90.9%)

1 (9.1%)



15 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

If your answer at the question above is no, please mention your reasons(2 responses)

-

I would recommend the PM Master only this that person is fully committed to this endeavour as it is very hard toattend the class and Rnish the homework and projects if you are working, mainly due to the module system. And ifthe person has a bit of experience in project management as it is a bit harder for colleagues without experience tounderstand and visualise the concepts and instruments presented. I do appreciate that the classes are in theevening but the mandatory presence is a bit too much for this level. It could be developed an online platform wereall class materials and handout could be loaded and interaction with the professors for transmitting the homeworkand necessary requirements. This way all the students have the needed information in due time and couldcomplete the tasks without mandatory presence.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

YES

NO

YES, BUT....

10 (90.9%)

0 (0%)

1 (9.1%)



16 of 16 31/03/17 12:44

2017 questionnaire students’ opinion 1st year - google forms...gender (11 responses) master format...

Documents