eprints.undip.ac.ideprints.undip.ac.id/71299/3/3._shear_strength_evaluation... · 2019-04-08 ·...

7

Upload: others

Post on 13-Jun-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: eprints.undip.ac.ideprints.undip.ac.id/71299/3/3._Shear_strength_evaluation... · 2019-04-08 · Social Media and Citations beyond Scopus. Metrics 4 Citations in Scopus 20th percentile
Page 2: eprints.undip.ac.ideprints.undip.ac.id/71299/3/3._Shear_strength_evaluation... · 2019-04-08 · Social Media and Citations beyond Scopus. Metrics 4 Citations in Scopus 20th percentile
Page 3: eprints.undip.ac.ideprints.undip.ac.id/71299/3/3._Shear_strength_evaluation... · 2019-04-08 · Social Media and Citations beyond Scopus. Metrics 4 Citations in Scopus 20th percentile
Page 4: eprints.undip.ac.ideprints.undip.ac.id/71299/3/3._Shear_strength_evaluation... · 2019-04-08 · Social Media and Citations beyond Scopus. Metrics 4 Citations in Scopus 20th percentile

Scopus

Document details

20 of 27

Shear strength evaluation of bentonite stabilised with recycled materials (Article)

, , ,

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, AustraliaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

AbstractThe volumetric deviations in montmorillonite-rich clays like bentonite render such soils unsuitable to supportoverlying pavement and foundation structures. Moreover, green construction and sustainable waste managementpractices have adapted use of waste recycled materials for engineering purposes. This study explores the feasibility ofusing recycled construction and demolition waste and ground granulated blast furnace slag for developing shearstrength properties of bentonite clay. Direct shear tests were performed on specimens from bentonite and bentonite-stabiliser composites to evaluate the effect of both stabilisers under different curing times and percentages.Microanalyses were conducted to obtain microstructural, mineralogical and elemental composition of the stabilisedand unstabilised samples. Results exhibit that shear strength increased with increasing stabiliser percentages andcuring time, and the effects were more enhanced on higher stabiliser dosages and curing periods. Sample cohesionvalue increased from 58.90 kPa for pure bentonite sample to 67.26 kPa for the maximum additive percentages of 5%slag and 20%construction waste (sample S3G5), after 28 days of curing. The internal friction angle also increased by7.3° from the pure sample to the S3G5 bentonite-stabilisers composite specimen. Peak shear stress values alsoshowed a development of 55.95 kPa after additive induction and 28 days curing, for 200 kPa of normal stress. Curingperiod also affected the development of cohesion and peak shear strength of the stabilised samples. Internal frictionalangle for sample S3G5 also escalated by 2.3°, after 28 days, from the 25.0° value after sample curing of 1 day.Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrographs and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) spectra show thatstabilisers occupied vesicles and cracks found in construction waste particles, resulting in better particle interlockingmechanism and greater shear strength.

SciVal Topic Prominence

Topic:

Prominence percentile: 81.105

Reaxys Database Information

Author keywordsBentonite Recycled materials Shear strength

Indexed keywords

Engineeringcontrolled terms:

Adhesion Blast furnaces Cements Curing Demolition Energy dispersive spectroscopy

Friction Recycling Scanning electron microscopy Shear flow Shear strength

Shear stress Slags Soil testing Strength of materials Waste management

Engineeringuncontrolled terms

Construction and demolition waste Energy dispersive spectroscopies (EDS)

Ground granulated blast furnace slag Interlocking mechanisms Internal friction angle

Internal frictional angles Recycled materials Sustainable waste management

◅ Back to results ◅ Previous ▻Next

CSV export Download Print E-mail Save to PDF ⋆ Save to list ▻More...

View at Publisher

Journal of GeoEngineeringVolume 11, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 59-73

Hasan, U.a Chegenizadeh, A.a Budihardjo, M.A.b Nikraz, H.a

a

b

View references (23)

Slags | Viscosity | TiO2 content

PlumX MetricsUsage, Captures, Mentions,Social Media and Citationsbeyond Scopus.

Metrics

4 Citations in Scopus

20th percentile

1.00 Field-Weighted

Citation Impact

Cited by 4 documents

, ,

(2019) Journal of CleanerProduction

, ,

(2018) E3S Web of Conferences

, ,

(2018) Buildings

Inform me when this documentis cited in Scopus:

Related documents

, ,

(2016) Applied Clay Science

 ▻View all metrics

Critical review andmethodological issues inintegrated life-cycle analysis onroad networks

Hasan, U. Whyte, A. Al Jassmi,H.

Potential Utilization of SewageSludge from Water TreatmentPlant as Brick Material

Samadikun, B.P. Rukayah, S.Priyambada, I.B.

Life-cycle asset management inresidential developmentsbuilding on transport systemcritical attributes via a data-mining algorithm

Hasan, U. Whyte, A. Al Jassmi,H.

View all 4 citing documents

Set citation alert ▻

▻Set citation feed

Investigation on shear strengthof stabilised clay using cement,sodium silicate and slag

Vakili, M.V. Chegenizadeh, A.Nikraz, H.

Page 5: eprints.undip.ac.ideprints.undip.ac.id/71299/3/3._Shear_strength_evaluation... · 2019-04-08 · Social Media and Citations beyond Scopus. Metrics 4 Citations in Scopus 20th percentile

Scopus

Source details

Journal of GeoEngineeringScopus coverage years: from 2006 to 2018Publisher: Taiwan Geotechnical SocietyISSN: 1990-8326Subject area: Earth and Planetary Sciences: Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

View all documents ▻ Set document alert

↗Visit Scopus Journal Metrics

CiteScore 2017

0.80

SJR 2017

0.377

SNIP 2017

0.837

CiteScore CiteScore rank & trend Scopus content coverage

Calculated using data from 30 April, 2018CiteScore

*CiteScore includes all available document types

0.80 =

 Citation Count 2017

 Documents 2014 -2016*

=

Metrics displaying this icon are compiled according to , a collaboration betweenindustry and academia.

2017

▻28 Citations

▻35 Documents

▻View CiteScore methodology ▻CiteScore FAQ

Last updated on 08 March, 2019CiteScoreTracker 2018

0.86 =  Citation Count 2018

 Documents 2015 - 2017 =

Updated monthly

▻36 Citations to date

▻42 Documents to date

↗ Snowball Metrics

CiteScore rank

Category Rank Percentile

Earth andPlanetary Sciences

 #82/176 53rd

 

GeotechnicalEngineeringandEngineeringGeology

▻View CiteScore trends

🔗Add CiteScore to your site

About Scopus

What is Scopus

Content coverage

Scopus blog

Scopus API

Privacy matters

Language

⽇本語に切り替える切换到简体中文

切換到繁體中文

Русский язык

Customer Service

Help

Contact us

Copyright © 2019 . All rights reserved. Scopus® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the

.

↗Terms and conditions ↗Privacy policy

↗Elsevier B.V

use of cookies

Page 6: eprints.undip.ac.ideprints.undip.ac.id/71299/3/3._Shear_strength_evaluation... · 2019-04-08 · Social Media and Citations beyond Scopus. Metrics 4 Citations in Scopus 20th percentile

2/15/2019 Journal of GeoEngineering

https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=19700186894&tip=sid&clean=0 1/3

also developed by scimago: SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Scimago Journal & Country Rank

Home Journal Rankings Country Rankings Viz Tools Help About Us

Journal of GeoEngineeringCountry Taiwan  -  SIR Ranking of Taiwan 13

H Index

Subject Area and Category Earth and Planetary Sciences Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Publisher Taiwan Geotechnical Society

Publication type Journals

ISSN 19908326

Coverage 2006-ongoing

Join the conversation about this journal

Enter Journal Title, ISSN or Publisher Name

Quartiles

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green)comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the thirdhighest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

Category Year QuartileGeotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology 2007 Q2Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology 2008 Q2Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology 2009 Q3Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology 2010 Q2

SJR

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator thatranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It isbased on the idea that 'all citations are not createdequal'. SJR is a measure of scienti�c in�uence ofjournals that accounts for both the number of citationsreceived by a journal and the importance or prestige ofthe journals where such citations come from Itmeasures the scienti�c in�uence of the average articlein a journal it expresses how central to the global

Citations per document

This indicator counts the number of citations received bydocuments from a journal and divides them by the totalnumber of documents published in that journal. Thechart shows the evolution of the average number oftimes documents published in a journal in the past two,three and four years have been cited in the current year.The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Cites per document Year ValueCites / Doc. (4 years) 2006 0.000Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2007 0.444Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2008 0.476Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2009 0.441

Total Cites Self-Cites

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal'sself-citations received by a journal's publisheddocuments during the three previous years.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017

0

0.7

1.4

2.1

Page 7: eprints.undip.ac.ideprints.undip.ac.id/71299/3/3._Shear_strength_evaluation... · 2019-04-08 · Social Media and Citations beyond Scopus. Metrics 4 Citations in Scopus 20th percentile

2/15/2019 Journal of GeoEngineering

https://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=19700186894&tip=sid&clean=0 2/3

Leave a comment

Name

Email

(will not be published)

Cites per document Year ValueCites / Doc. (4 years) 2010 0.596Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2011 0.449Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2012 0.275Cites / Doc. (4 years) 2013 0.571

Journal Self-citation is de�ned as the number of citationfrom a journal citing article to articles published by thesame journal.

Cites Year Value

External Cites per Doc Cites per Doc

Evolution of the number of total citation per documentand external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's publisheddocuments during the three previous years. Externalcitations are calculated by subtracting the number ofself-citations from the total number of citations receivedby the journal’s documents.

Cit Y V l

% International Collaboration

International Collaboration accounts for the articles thathave been produced by researchers from severalcountries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal'sdocuments signed by researchers from more than onecountry; that is including more than one country address.

Year International Collaboration2006 0.002007 16 67

Citable documents Non-citable documents

Not every article in a journal is considered primaryresearch and therefore "citable", this chart shows theratio of a journal's articles including substantial research(research articles, conference papers and reviews) inthree year windows vs. those documents other thanresearch articles, reviews and conference papers.

Documents Year ValueN it bl d t 2006 0

Cited documents Uncited documents

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three yearswindows, that have been cited at least once vs. thosenot cited during the following year.

Documents Year ValueUncited documents 2006 0Uncited documents 2007 6Uncited documents 2008 15Uncited documents 2009 25

← Show this widget inyour own website Just copy the code belowand paste within your htmlcode:

<a href="https://www.scimag

1

1.25

20

40

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

0

0.6

1.2

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

0

25

50

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

0

20

40

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

0

20

40