2019 social progress index · 2020-02-26 · 1515 • the social progress index disentangles the...

2019 Social Progress Index

22

2019 Social Progress Index Framework

www.socialprogress.org

2019 SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX FRAMEWORK

FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING

SOCIAL PROGRESS INDEX

OPPORTUNITYBASIC HUMAN NEEDS

Nutrition & Basic Medical Care Undernourishment Maternal mortality rate Child mortality rate Child stunting Deaths from infectious disease

Water & Sanitation Access to at least basic drinking water Access to piped water Access to at least basic sanitation facilities Rural open defecation

Shelter Access to electricity Quality of electricity supply Household air pollution attributable deaths Access to clean fuels and technology for cooking

Personal Safety Homicide rate Political killings and torture Perceived criminality Traffic deaths

Access to Basic Knowledge Adult literacy rate Primary school enrollment Secondary school enrollment Gender parity in secondary enrollment Acces to quality education

Access to Information and Communications Mobile telephone subscriptions Internet users Access to online governance Media censorship

Health & Wellness Life expectancy at 60 Premature deaths from non-communicable diseases Access to essential health services Access to quality healthcare

Environmental Quality Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths Greenhouse gas emissions Biome protection

Personal Rights Political rights Freedom of expression Freedom of religion Access to justice Property rights for women

Personal Freedom & Choice Vulnerable employment Early marriage Satisfied demand for contraception Corruption

Inclusiveness Acceptance of gays and lesbians Discrimination and violence against minorities Equalitiy of political power by gender Equalitiy of political power by socioeconomic position Equalitiy of political power by social group

Access to Advanced Education Years of tertiary schooling Women’s average years in school Globally ranked universities Percent of tertiary students enrolled in globally

ranked universities

Do people have enough food to eat and are they receiving basic medical care?

Can people drink water and keep themselves clean without getting sick?

Do people have adequate housing with basic utilities?

Do people feel safe?

Do people have access to an educational foundation?

Can people freely access ideas and information from anywhere in the world?

Do people live long and healthy lives?

Is this society using its resources so they will be available for future generations?

Are people’s rights as individuals protected?

Are people free to make their own life choices?

Is no one excluded from the opportunity to be a contributing member of society?

Do people have access to the world’s most advanced knowledge?

The Social Progress Index asks universally important questions about the success of out societies

33

2019 Social Progress Index aggregates 50+ social and environmental outcome indicators from 149 countries


















ranked universities

44 www.socialprogress.org

COLOR SCALE EXPLORATION

OPTION 3GRADIENTSWATCHES EXAMPLES

CMYK 78 34 9 0 HEX #2b8cbe

CMYK 34 0 36 0HEX #ccebc5

CMYK 96 71 7 0HEX #08589e

CMYK 69 0 39 0HEX #4eb3d3

CMYK 50 0 27 0HEX #a8ddb5

CMYK 64 11 11 0HEX #7bccc4

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Tier 4

Tier 5

Tier 6

2019 Social Progress Index Results

55

2019 Social Progress Index rankings (1)

1. Norway 90.952. Denmark 90.093. Switzerland 89.894. Finland 89.565. Sweden 89.456. Iceland 89.297. New Zealand 88.938. Germany 88.849. Canada 88.8110. Japan 88.3411. Netherlands 88.3112. Australia 88.0213. United Kingdom 87.9814. Ireland 87.9715 France 87.79

16. Luxembourg 87.6617. Spain 87.4718. Portugal 87.1219. Belgium 86.7720. Austria 86.4021. Slovenia 85.8022. Italy 85.6923. Korea, Republic of 85.6124. Czech Republic 84.3625. Estonia 83.9826. United States 83.6227. Singapore 83.2328. Cyprus 83.1429. Malta 82.6330. Greece 82.48

31. Israel 81.4432. Lithuania 81.3033. Poland 81.2534. Costa Rica 80.6535. Slovakia 80.4336. Latvia 80.4237. Chile 80.0238. Croatia 79.2139. Hungary 78.7740. Barbados 77.8941. Uruguay 77.7742. Argentina 76.8643. Bulgaria 76.1744. Mauritius 74.8845. Romania 74.81

46. Malaysia 74.1747. Panama 73.9648. Belarus 73.9049. Brazil 72.8750. Jamaica 72.5851. Tunisia 72.3352. Ecuador 71.8853. Serbia 71.5954. Albania 71.5755. Mexico 71.5156. Georgia 71.3457. Peru 71.3158. Montenegro 71.1659. Armenia 71.1460. Colombia 70.31

Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3

66

2019 Social Progress Index rankings (2)Tier 5105. Timor-Leste 55.80106. Turkmenistan 55.57107. Tajikistan 54.92108. Bangladesh 54.11109. Kenya 53.51110. Rwanda 52.96111. Gambia, The 52.90112. Tanzania 52.69113. Myanmar 52.65114. Comoros 52.04115. Eswatini 51.21116. Benin 51.07117. Côte d'Ivoire 50.56118. Malawi 50.52119. Cambodia 50.36120. Laos 49.34121. Nigeria 49.20122. Sierra Leone 49.09123. Togo 48.58124. Lesotho 48.44125. Pakistan 48.20

126. Djibouti 48.05127. Cameroon 48.04128. Burkina Faso 47.82129. Korea, Democratic

Republic of46.95

130. Liberia 46.67131. Zimbabwe 46.58132. Mali 45.98133. Congo, Republic of 45.67134. Ethiopia 45.41135. Mozambique 45.39136. Madagascar 43.58137. Angola 42.58138. Mauritania 42.45

Tier 461. United Arab Emirates 69.8462. Russia 69.7163. Jordan 69.5764. Qatar 69.3765. Sri Lanka 69.0966. Oman 69.0867. Republic of North

Macedonia68.92

68. Cabo Verde 68.5569. Kazakhstan 68.2070. Moldova 67.5871. Turkey 67.4972. Thailand 67.4773. South Africa 67.4474. Cuba 67.4275. Suriname 67.2776. Bhutan 67.2677. Paraguay 67.2078. Dominican Republic 67.1579. Algeria 67.0680. Ukraine 66.97

81. Kyrgyzstan 66.6482. Morocco 66.0483. Mongolia 65.6084. Botswana 65.5885. Indonesia 65.5286. Iran 65.1587. Lebanon 64.9888. El Salvador 64.6589. China 64.5490. Saudi Arabia 63.9591. Fiji 63.8592. Guyana 63.7493. Bolivia 63.6694. Philippines 63.4095. Ghana 61.7596. Egypt 61.7197. Sao Tome and Principe 61.4298. Honduras 60.3199. Nepal 60.23100. Uzbekistan 59.83101. Guatemala 59.67102. India 59.10103. Nicaragua 58.97104. Senegal 58.59

77

2019 Social Progress Index rankings (3)

139. Niger 41.74140. Sudan 41.59141. Guinea 40.59142. Burundi 39.09143. Afghanistan 38.60144. Papua New Guinea 38.59145. Congo, Democratic

Republic of36.77

146. Eritrea 31.61147. Chad 28.79148. Central African

Republic28.05

149. South Sudan 24.44

Tier 6

88

On average, the world is improving

Since 2014, 137 countries (92% of those measured) have improved by half a point or more; have 122 improved by one point or more, and 46 countries have improved by three or more points.

2019: 64.472014: 62.16

Since 2014, the population-weighted world average score has improved by 2.31 points.

99

Since 2014, the world has improved most on Access to Information and Communications, Access to Advanced Education, Water and Sanitation, and Shelter.

World progress has been uneven, with declines in Personal Rights and stagnation on Personal Safety, Access to Basic Knowledge and Inclusiveness.

From 2014 to 2019 the world improved on 8 of 12 components

1010

10

The GambiaNepalSierra LeoneEthiopiaMyanmarEswatini

Burkina FasoCôte d’IvoireDjiboutiSri LankaGhanaTanzaniaAngolaLuxembourg

+4 to +5 points >+5 points

The greatest strides are being made in lower income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia.

10

1111

Four countries declined on social progress since 2014.

NicaraguaUnited States

BrazilSouth Sudan

1212

GDP is not destiny So

cial

Pro

gres

s In

dex

Scor

e

GDP PPP per capita (in USD)

Across the spectrum, we see how some countries are much better at turning their economic growth into social progress than others.

1313

Just 12 countries over-perform on social progress relative to their incomes, while 26 countries are underperformers.

Kyrgyzstan and Costa Rica over-perform by the greatest margin, while Saudi Arabia and Qatar are the biggest underperformers.

1414

Over- and underperformers on social progress

1515

• The Social Progress Index disentangles the social and economic aspects of countries’ performance, making it possible to compare a state’s quality of life to that of its economic peers.

• We define a country’s economic peers as the 15 countries closest in GDP per capita PPP.

• By analyzing a country’s performance relative to its economic peers, we can uncover which countries are best at turning each dollar of income into better social outcomes.

• We can also analyze the world’s performance relative to its wealth by comparing its scores to the 15 countries closest in GDP to the global average.

Comparing national performance

1616

World

1717

The world underperformsrelative to its income on 7 components.

The world lags most on Water and Sanitation and Personal Rights.

Degree of world underperformance

-12 -8 -4 0

17

1818

FOUNDATIONS OF WELLBEING Score/ Value Rank

Strength/Weakness

82.05 32

Access to Basic Knowledge 92.35 45

Adult literacy rate2 (% of pop. aged 15+) 99.00 1

Primary school enrollment (% of children) 99.64 20

Secondary school enrollment2 (% of children) 92.18 30

Gender parity in secondary enrollment3 (girls/boys) 0.99 1

Access to quality education (0=unequal; 4=equal) 2.36 75

Access to Information & Communications 90.10 19Mobile telephone subscriptions (subscriptions/100 people) 120.69 1

Internet users (% of pop.) 75.23 46

Access to online governance (0=low; 1=high) 0.98 5

Media censorship (0=frequent; 4=rare) 3.27 39

Health & Wellness 75.27 34

Life expectancy at 60 (years) 23.27 36

Premature deaths from non- communicable diseases (deaths/100,000) 287.85 46

Access to essential health services (0=none; 100=full coverage) 87.77 30

Access to quality healthcare (0=unequal; 4=equal) 2.35 70

Environmental Quality 70.48 59Outdoor air pollution attributable deaths (deaths/100,000) 15.04 25

Greenhouse gas emissions2 (CO2 equivalents per GDP) 379.18 65

Biome protection (% of biomes) 10.07 98

BASIC HUMAN NEEDS Score/ Value Rank

Strength/Weakness

91.64 35Nutrition & Basic Medical Care 97.33 30

Undernourishment (% of pop.) 2.50 1

Maternal mortality rate (deaths/100,000 live births) 30.10 64

Child mortality rate (deaths/1,000 live births) 6.60 41

Child stunting (% of children) 2.37 3Deaths from infectious diseases (deaths/100,000) 21.54 38

Water & Sanitation 99.40 26Access to at least basic drinking water (% of pop.) 99.27 44

Access to piped water (% of pop.) 98.74 37

Access to at least basic4 sanitation facilities (% of pop.) 99.97 11

Rural open defecation (% of pop.) 0.00 1

Shelter 96.94 23

Access to electricity (% of pop.) 100.00 1

Quality of electricity supply (1=low; 7=high) 6.24 25

Household air pollution attributable deaths (deaths/100,000 people) 0.09 11

Access to clean fuels and technology for cooking (% of pop.) 100.00 1

Personal Safety 72.91 57

Homicide rate1 (deaths/100,000) 5.35 93

Perceived criminality (1=low; 5=high) 3.00 33

Political killings and torture (0=low freedom; 1=high freedom) 0.91 43

Traffic deaths (deaths/100,000) 12.92 62

OPPORTUNITY Score/ Value Rank

Strength/Weakness

77.17 19

Personal Rights 91.58 32

Political rights (0=no rights; 40=full rights) 33.00 49

Freedom of expression (0=no freedom; 1=full freedom) 0.93 25

Freedom of religion (0=no freedom; 4=full freedom) 3.72 48

Access to justice (0=non-existent; 1=observed) 0.92 34

Property rights for women (0=no right; 5=full rights) 4.74 47

Personal Freedom & Choice 85.67 20

Vulnerable employment (% of employees) 3.73 6

Early marriage (% of women) 2.00 31

Satisfied demand for contraception (% of women) 82.60 32

Corruption (0=high; 100=low) 71.00 21

Inclusiveness 58.78 40Acceptance of gays and lesbians (0=low; 100=high) 74.77 18

Discrimination and violence against minorities (0=low; 10=high) 6.10 74

Equality of political power by gender (0=unequal power; 4=equal power) 2.39 41

Equality of political power by socioeconomic position (0=unequal power; 4=equal power) 2.07 81

Equality of political power by social group (0=unequal power; 4=equal power) 2.61 62

Access to Advanced Education 72.65 3

Years of tertiary schooling 4.03 12

Women’s average years in school 13.40 3

Globally ranked universities (points) 379.00 1

Percent of tertiary students enrolled in globally ranked universities 25.00 46

UNITED STATES

Comparing CountriesOver- and underperformance is relative to 15 countries of similar GDP per capita:

Switzerland, Saudi Arabia, Netherlands, Iceland, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Australia, Norway, Canada, Ireland, Belgium, United Arab Emirates, Finland

Notes1. Homicide rate and globally ranked universities are log-transformed for calculation.

2. The following indicators are capped for calculation: Adult literacy rate (99), secondary school enrollment (100), mobile telephone subscriptions (100), and greenhouse gas emissions (1,955.52).

3. Gender parity in secondary enrollment is transformed to reflect the absolute distance from 1 for calculation. Calculated absolute distance below 0.03 is assigned a value of 0.03.

2019 Social Progress Index 83.62/100 26/149GDP PPP per capita $55,681 8/149

Score/Value Rank Strength/Weakness

KeyOverperforming by 1 or more pts.

Overperforming by less than 1 pt.

Performing within the expected range

Underperforming by less than 1 pt.

Underperforming by 1 or more pts.

No data available

1919

G7 social progress 2014-2019

-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

United States

United Kingdom

France

Germany

Italy

Canada

Japan

The US is the only G7 country that has gone backwards on social progress. It is also one of only 4 countries where social progress has declined, along with Brazil, Nicaragua and South Sudan.

2020 Social Progress Index Score

US social progress 2014 to 2019

2121

The Social Progress Index captures outcomes related to all 17 Sustainable Development Goals in a simple but rigorous framework designed for aggregation, making it an invaluable proxy measure of SDG performance.

2222


















ranked universities

The Social Progress Index and the SDGs

2323

According to projections based on the 2019 Social Progress Index, at its current pace the world will not achieve the SDGs until 2073

2424

US city-level SPIs empower mayors, business and civic leaders

with new insight to prioritize policies and investments

City of San Jose, CaliforniaSPI maps social progress and

skills gaps to reveal key workforce needs neighborhood

by neighborhood

India state and district-level SPI developed with government think

tank benchmarks performance and guides CSR investments

Government of Paraguayadopted SPI to set targets and monitor progress towards child nutrition and education goals

European Union regionalSPI provides a roadmap for

policymakers to guide €350 billion+ in EU Cohesion Policy spending

London Borough of Barking & Dagenham ward-level SPI holds government accountable to ensure

no one is left behind left behind

South Africa SPI being developed to unify public and

private sectors to improve social outcomes

Minsur uses local SPIs to prioritize investments

to improve social progress in its mining communities in Peru

Australia state-level SPIis being developed to foster cross-sector collaboration to address shared social issues

SPI Amazonia Index used by Coca-Cola and Natura

to design supply chain strategies in Brazil

Our global network of local partners deliver subnational Social Progress Indexes that have revealed the true state of the society for more than 2.7 billion people across 45+ countries.

This powerful tool allows policymakers and leaders from business and civil society to pinpoint priorities for action and provides a framework for collaboration.

From Index to Action to ImpactDelivering local data and insight that is meaningful, relevant and actionable

2525

Strategic partners

Major supporters

Our partners and supporters Shifting the world’s debates and actions to advance social progress requires resolve, inspiration and investment.

The Social Progress Imperative is grateful to our many generous supporters,particularly our Strategic Partners for their collaboration and critical multi-year support.

2626

Thank you.

www.socialprogress.org@socprogress

2727

Appendix A: Social progress change 2014-19

27

2828

81. Kyrgyzstan 66.64 ↑82. Morocco 66.04 ↑83. Mongolia 65.60 ↑84. Botswana 65.58 ↑85. Indonesia 65.52 ↑86. Iran 65.15 ↑87. Lebanon 64.98 ↑88. El Salvador 64.65 ↔89. China 64.54 ↑90. Saudi Arabia 63.95 ↑91. Fiji 63.85 ↑92. Guyana 63.74 ↑93. Bolivia 63.66 ↑94. Philippines 63.40 ↑95. Ghana 61.75 ↑

46. Malaysia 74.17 ↑47. Panama 73.96 ↑48. Belarus 73.90 ↑49. Brazil 72.87 ↓50. Jamaica 72.58 ↑51. Tunisia 72.33 ↑52. Ecuador 71.88 ↑53. Serbia 71.59 ↑54. Albania 71.57 ↑55. Mexico 71.51 ↑56. Georgia 71.34 ↑57. Peru 71.31 ↑58. Montenegro 71.16 ↔59. Armenia 71.14 ↑60. Colombia 70.31 ↔

2019 Social Progress Index rankings

Tier 11. Norway 90.95 ↑2. Denmark 90.09 ↑3. Switzerland 89.89 ↑4. Finland 89.56 ↑5. Sweden 89.45 ↑6. Iceland 89.29 ↑7. New Zealand 88.93 ↑8. Germany 88.84 ↑9. Canada 88.81 ↑10. Japan 88.34 ↑11. Netherlands 88.31 ↔12. Australia 88.02 ↑13. United Kingdom 87.98 ↑14. Ireland 87.97 ↑15. France 87.79 ↑

Tier 216. Luxembourg 87.66 ↑17. Spain 87.47 ↑18. Portugal 87.12 ↑19. Belgium 86.77 ↑20. Austria 86.40 ↑21. Slovenia 85.80 ↑22. Italy 85.69 ↑23. Korea, Republic of 85.61 ↑24. Czech Republic 84.36 ↑25. Estonia 83.98 ↑26. United States 83.62 ↓27. Singapore 83.23 ↑28. Cyprus 83.14 ↑29. Malta 82.63 ↑30. Greece 82.48 ↑

Tier 331. Israel 81.44 ↑32. Lithuania 81.30 ↑33. Poland 81.25 ↑34. Costa Rica 80.65 ↑35. Slovakia 80.43 ↑36. Latvia 80.42 ↑37. Chile 80.02 ↑38. Croatia 79.21 ↑39. Hungary 78.77 ↔40. Barbados 77.89 ↑41. Uruguay 77.77 ↔42. Argentina 76.86 ↑43. Bulgaria 76.17 ↑44. Mauritius 74.88 ↑45. Romania 74.81 ↑

Key: ↑ Improved by 0.5 points or more 2014 to 2019↓ Declined by 0.5 points or more 2014 to 2019↔ Changed by less than 0.5 points 2014 to 2019

Tier 461. United Arab Emirates 69.84 ↑62. Russia 69.71 ↑63. Jordan 69.57 ↑64. Qatar 69.37 ↑65. Sri Lanka 69.09 ↑66. Oman 69.08 ↑

67.Rep. of North Macedonia 68.92 ↑

68. Cabo Verde 68.55 ↑69. Kazakhstan 68.20 ↑70. Moldova 67.58 ↑71. Turkey 67.49 ↑72. Thailand 67.47 ↔73. South Africa 67.44 ↑74. Cuba 67.42 ↑75. Suriname 67.27 ↑76. Bhutan 67.26 ↑77. Paraguay 67.20 ↑78. Dominican Republic 67.15 ↑79. Algeria 67.06 ↑80. Ukraine 66.97 ↔

96. Egypt 61.71 ↑97. Sao Tome and Principe 61.42 ↑98. Honduras 60.31 ↑99. Nepal 60.23 ↑100.Uzbekistan 59.83 ↑101.Guatemala 59.67 ↑102.India 59.10 ↑103.Nicaragua 58.97 ↓104.Senegal 58.59 ↑

2929

2019 Social Progress Index rankings

126. Djibouti 48.05 ↑127. Cameroon 48.04 ↑128. Burkina Faso 47.82 ↑129. Korea, Dem. Republic of 46.95 ↑130. Liberia 46.67 ↑131. Zimbabwe 46.58 ↑132. Mali 45.98 ↑133. Congo, Republic of 45.67 ↑134. Ethiopia 45.41 ↑135. Mozambique 45.39 ↑136. Madagascar 43.58 ↑137. Angola 42.58 ↑138. Mauritania 42.45 ↑

Tier 5105. Timor-Leste 55.80 ↑106. Turkmenistan 55.57 ↑107. Tajikistan 54.92 ↑108. Bangladesh 54.11 ↑109. Kenya 53.51 ↑110. Rwanda 52.96 ↑111. Gambia, The 52.90 ↑112. Tanzania 52.69 ↑113. Myanmar 52.65 ↑114. Comoros 52.04 ↑115. Eswatini 51.21 ↑116. Benin 51.07 ↑117. Côte d'Ivoire 50.56 ↑118. Malawi 50.52 ↑119. Cambodia 50.36 ↑120. Laos 49.34 ↑121. Nigeria 49.20 ↑122. Sierra Leone 49.09 ↑123. Togo 48.58 ↑124. Lesotho 48.44 ↑125. Pakistan 48.20 ↑

Tier 6139. Niger 41.74 ↑140. Sudan 41.59 ↑141. Guinea 40.59 ↑142. Burundi 39.09 ↑143. Afghanistan 38.60 ↑144. Papua New Guinea 38.59 ↑145. Congo, Dem. Republic of 36.77 ↑146. Eritrea 31.61 ↑147. Chad 28.79 ↑148. Central African Republic 28.05 ↑149. South Sudan 24.44 ↓

Key: ↑ Improved by 0.5 points or more 2014 to 2019↓ Declined by 0.5 points or more 2014 to 2019↔ Changed by less than 0.5 points 2014 to 2019

3030

Appendix B: Country scorecards

30

3131


Strength/Weakness

92.32 1




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 99.44 1











Strength/Weakness

83.64 1






















NORWAY


Ireland, United Arab Emirates, Switzerland, United States, Saudi Arabia, Netherlands, Iceland, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Germany, Australia, Canada, Singapore, Belgium











No data available

3232


Strength/Weakness

88.36 14




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 98.32 12











Strength/Weakness

81.29 9






















CANADA


Belgium, Australia, Germany, Austria, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Iceland, United Kingdom, Netherlands, France, Japan, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Malta











No data available

3333


Strength/Weakness

90.72 4




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 99.03 6











Strength/Weakness

78.20 15






















FRANCE


Japan, Oman, United Kingdom, Finland, Malta, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Italy, Belgium, Spain, Canada, Israel, Australia, Germany, Austria











No data available

3434


Strength/Weakness

87.70 18




Secondary school enrollment2 (% of children) n/a n/a
















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 96.66 27











Strength/Weakness

83.06 4






















GERMANY


Austria, Australia, Sweden, Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Belgium, Netherlands, Finland, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom, France, Japan, Oman, Malta











No data available

3535


Strength/Weakness

88.64 12




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 95.60 31











Strength/Weakness

76.12 21






















ITALY


Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Spain, Malta, Israel, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Oman, Japan, France, Slovenia, United Kingdom, Slovakia, Finland, Estonia











No data available

3636


Strength/Weakness

91.04 3




















Strength/Weakness









Rural open defecation (% of pop.) n/a n/a

Shelter 98.65 9











Strength/Weakness

76.26 20






















JAPAN


France, Oman, United Kingdom, Finland, Malta, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Italy, Belgium, Spain, Canada, Israel, Australia, Germany, Czech Republic











No data available

3737


Strength/Weakness

89.05 10




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 98.60 11











Strength/Weakness

80.28 11






















UNITED KINGDOM


Finland, France, Japan, Oman, Belgium, Malta, New Zealand, Canada, Republic of Korea, Italy, Australia, Germany, Austria, Spain, Israel











No data available

3838


Strength/Weakness

68.85 78



Primary school enrollment (% of children) n/a n/a

















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 82.40 81











Strength/Weakness

43.41 107


Political rights (0=no rights; 40=full rights) -1.00 145




















CHINA


Dominican Republic, Serbia, Costa Rica, Brazil, Algeria, Suriname, Thailand, Turkmenistan, Botswana, Montenegro, Colombia, Republic of North Macedonia, Barbados, Peru, Belarus











No data available


Strength/Weakness

68.85 78




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 82.40 81











Strength/Weakness

43.41 107






















CHINA













No data available


Strength/Weakness

68.85 78




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 82.40 81











Strength/Weakness

43.41 107






















CHINA













No data available


Strength/Weakness

68.85 78




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 82.40 81











Strength/Weakness

43.41 107






















CHINA













No data available


Strength/Weakness

68.85 78




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 82.40 81











Strength/Weakness

43.41 107






















CHINA













No data available


Strength/Weakness

68.85 78




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 82.40 81











Strength/Weakness

43.41 107






















CHINA













No data available


Strength/Weakness

68.85 78




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 82.40 81











Strength/Weakness

43.41 107






















CHINA













No data available


Strength/Weakness

68.85 78




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 82.40 81











Strength/Weakness

43.41 107






















CHINA













No data available

3939


Strength/Weakness

58.94 109




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 71.35 96











Strength/Weakness

50.63 79






















INDIA


Cabo Verde, Angola, Laos, Moldova, Uzbekistan, Bolivia, El Salvador, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, Nigeria, Republic of Congo, Guyana, Morocco, Philippines, Guatemala











No data available

4040


Strength/Weakness

72.40 62




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 92.11 49











Strength/Weakness

52.83 67






















RUSSIA


Latvia, Greece, Turkey, Kazakhstan, Hungary, Romania, Chile, Malaysia, Croatia, Poland, Panama, Portugal, Uruguay, Lithuania, Mauritius











No data available

4141


Strength/Weakness

65.35 93




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 79.80 85











Strength/Weakness

63.03 45






















SOUTH AFRICA


Peru, Lebanon, Albania, Mongolia, Paraguay, Sri Lanka, Republic of North Macedonia, Colombia, Indonesia, Tunisia, Suriname, Algeria, Egypt, Ecuador, Brazil











No data available

4242


Strength/Weakness

59.36 107




















Strength/Weakness










Shelter 61.28 104











Strength/Weakness

52.09 69






















NEPAL


Zimbabwe, Comoros, Tanzania, Djibouti, Tajikistan, Lesotho, Kenya, Sao Tome and Principe, Guinea, Eritrea, Benin, Mali, Senegal, Rwanda, Chad











No data available

4343

Appendix C: Methodology

43

4444

Social Progress Index design principles

4545

Social Progress Index indicator selection

What is the source of this indicator?

How old are the data points?

How many geographic regions does this indicator cover?


Widely reputable and the methods it uses are sound

Reasonably current

95-100% of geographic regions

Most data points are more than 5-10 years old

Fewer than 95% of the geographic regions in the Index

Unknown, uses biased methods, or lacks rigorous data collection

4646

Social Progress Index indicator selection

What is the source of this indicator?

How old are the data points?

How many geographic regions does this indicator cover?


Widely reputable and the methods it uses are sound

Reasonably current

95-100% of geographic regions

Most data points are more than 5-10 years old

Fewer than 95% of the geographic regions in the Index

Unknown, uses biased methods, or lacks rigorous data collection

4747

Componentc = "!( wi ∗ indicatori )

Each component is calculated as the weighted sum of the individual indicators, where the

weights are determined by factor analysis.

Component methodology

4848

For each dimension, we calculate the sum of each of the

components:

The Social Progress Index is the sum across the three dimensions:

SPI = 13 "

dDimensiond

Dimensiond =14 "

cComponentc

Calculating dimensions and aggregate index

2019 social progress index · 2020-02-26 · 1515 • the social progress index disentangles the...

Documents