2020 gpvfdc surgical-restorative connection working copy · surgical planning considerations 49 ......
TRANSCRIPT
2/19/20
1
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental ImplantTreatment for the
General Practitioner: Why, Where, When and How for a Successful Outcome
1
What are the Keys to Success?
What are the Fundamental Rules and Guidelines?
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental Implant Treatment
2
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental Implant Treatment: Where We Were!
Surgically Driven (by the presence of adequate bone)
3
2/19/20
2
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental Implant Treatment: Where We Were!
Surgically Driven (by the presence of adequate bone)
4
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental Implant Treatment: Where We Are Now!
Restoratively Driven Treatment Planning = Restorative Success
5
Remember:
The tissue is the issue
The bone sets the tone
The mission is the dentition
6
2/19/20
3
The long term prognosis is affected differently by different treatment options for the same diagnosis
The goal is always to minimize risk and maximize the long term prognosis
7
Patients don’t attend our offices for implants but rather for teeththat function, look good and have a long term prognosis
8
What are the Criteria for Case Selection?
How Do I Plan for Success?
Diagnosis and Treatment Planning
9
2/19/20
4
§ CORRECT diagnosis!
§ Carefully thought out treatment planning
§ Proper management of occlusal forces
§ Successful management of the bacterial challenge(short maintenance interval, i.e., 3-4 mos. )
§ Understand the patient’s wishes: Are they realistic??
What are the Criteria for Success for Implant Therapy?
10
What are the Minimum Requirements for Successful Implant Treatment?
11
Suitable materialViable boneStability of the bone/implant material interface during healingCorrect position of the implant
12
2/19/20
5
What are the Differences We Need to Know BetweenTeeth and Implants?
13
Tooth vs. Implant
14
What are the Conditions Favoring Peri-Implant Papillae?
15
2/19/20
6
Conditions Favoring Peri-Implant Papillae
16
17
Treatment Planning in Implant Dentistry:
What is the Prosthetic Situation?
18
2/19/20
7
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…Patient Selection and Treatment
Planning in Implant Dentistry
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental Implant Treatment
19
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…What is the Patient’s Medical and
Dental History?
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental Implant Treatment
20
§ Does the patient’s present state of health
influence your decision? ASA I-IV ?
§ Is there a history of osteoporosis related
medications: injectable or oral?
§ What medications is the patient taking?
Medical History
21
2/19/20
8
Medical History
22
§ What if the patient has an INR of >3.0? Is the patient taking an anti-coagulant?
§ Are there other medical conditions, e.g. Sjogren’s or medications inhibiting salivary flow which influence a positive outcome?
Medical History
23
Medical History
24
2/19/20
9
§ Has the patient received regular dental care in thepast?
§ Does the patient have regular maintenance?
§ What is the history of the previous tooth loss, andwhat was the recommended treatment?
Dental History
25
Are there adjacent teeth present?:
§ Periodontal condition
§ Angulation
§ Length of edentulous space
§ Inter-arch space
Treatment Planning
26
§ Implant position: RESTORATIVELY DRIVEN !!
§ Reconstruction for Site Preparation?§ Bone and/or Soft Tissue if required:
§ At time of implant placement?§ As a separate procedure?
Treatment PlanningHow Do I Determine the Best Implant Position?:
27
2/19/20
10
DISCUSS with your patient:§ Multiple stages may be required
§ Deficiencies may need to be disguised prosthetically
§ Implants may require replacement in the future!
Treatment Planning
28
How Do I Evaluate Potential Implant Sites?
§ Single tooth space§ Tooth or root present§ Normal ridge form§ No inflammation§ No recession at adjacent teeth§ Low lip line
Positive Factors Negative Factors§ Multiple teeth missing§ Atrophy of edentulous space§ Inflammation of soft tissue§ Recession at adjacent teeth§ Highly visible site
29
Radiography and Imaging:What areToday’s Standards for Implant
Treatment?
30
2/19/20
11
§ Digital panorex
§ Digital periapical
§ CBCT scan
§ CAD/CAM technology
§ Treatment planning software
Radiography and Imaging
31
§ Digital radiographs are useful, however, are still two dimensional
§ CBCT scan gives accurate three dimensional model of the implant site
§ CBCT scans can be used with software designed to allow implants to be placed in the computer model, e.g.,
Radiography and Imaging
32
Radiographic Examination
§ Bone quality§ Bone quantity§ Anatomical structures§ Inferior alveolar nerve
§ Maxillary sinuses and nasal cavity
§ Roots of adjacent teeth
33
2/19/20
12
Radiographic Examination
The AAOMR recommends that cross-sectional imaging be used in the assessment of all dental implant sites and that CBCT is the imaging method of choice
Tyndall, D et al. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2012
34
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
3D Imaging: CBCT Scan
What is the Rationale?
Does it Impact the Surgical/Restorative Connection?
35
Mental foramenMental
nerve
Mandible nerve
Maxillary sinus
Problematic Areas!!!
36
2/19/20
13
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Rationale for 3D Imaging
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental ImplantTreatment
Dr. D Chenin
37
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Surgical Guide: Is it Necessary??
The Surgical/Restorative Connection
38
§ Provide a means of communication between the restorative dentist, surgeon and laboratory technician
§ In some cases, function as a radiographic guide
§ Should not interfere with flap elevation
The Surgical Guide Should:
Surgical Guide
39
2/19/20
14
Pre-Surgical Planning: Set Up/Wax Up or Scan (intra oral or model) ??
40
Surgical Guide
A diagnostic set-up or scan is essential to assist the surgeon and restorative dentist in deciding proper implant placement
Restoratively Driven Implant Placement
41
What are the Principles for Correct Implant Placement?
42
2/19/20
15
Restoratively Driven Treatment Plan: Clinical Case
43
Restoratively Driven Treatment Plan
Hopeless #21, 22 #21, 22 extracted
Impression Working model
44
Restoratively Driven Treatment Plan
Merging CBCT & Scan Data
Virtual Fixture Placement
45
2/19/20
16
Restoratively Driven Treatment Plan
Surgical Template Design
Surgical Guide & Abutment Temporary Crowns
46
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Restoratively Driven Treatment Plan
Checking Surgical Guide Fit CRITICAL!
47
Restoratively Driven Treatment Plan
Guided Surgery
48
2/19/20
17
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
The Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental ImplantTreatment
Surgical Planning Considerations
49
Classification and Descriptive Terms for the Timing: Implant Placement after Tooth Extraction
50
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Esthetic Risk Assessment (ERA)
51
2/19/20
18
What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of the Different Treatment Options for Implant
PlacementTiming?
52
Advantages:
53
Disadvantages:
54
2/19/20
19
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
What is the Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental Implant Treatment and How do We Achieve Success?
Natural Teeth and Implant/Restorations:Are There Differences?
Dr. Dennis Smith, Graduate Periodontics LLU School of Dentistry
55
§ Teeth possess a scallopedconnective tissue attachment
§ Root forms vary in length and shape
§ Crowns have anatomicalemergence profiles
§ Implants have hemi-desmosomal(no CT) attachment§ Implants are round, cylindrical or tapering§ Implant crowns have variable emergence profiles
Natural Teeth and Implant/Restorations:What are There Differences?
56
§ Bony contours—volume and quality§ Implant-crown contours and position§ Bone crest to proximal crown contact§ Biotypes/phenotypes§ Presence of periodontal disease§ Harmony with facial profiles/arch forms
What Factors Influence Gingival Architecture: Around Implants/Crowns ?
57
2/19/20
20
Labial thicknesses vary
Implant-crown contours and position determine gingival form
58
Natural root forms varyImplants are consistently
smaller and round!
59
Labial thicknesses vary
Implant crown form assumes an unnatural contour
60
2/19/20
21
Loss of oral structures:A surgical and prosthetic problem
(1) For the implant surgeon and restorative dentist, the challenge is to restore lost dental and periodontal structures to the “normal” with a smaller, round, cylindrical implant and a modified crown form.
What are the Challenges ?
61
(2) With the use of implants and crowns, how can one restore to normal gingival architecture and pleasing esthetics?
All treatments should be RESTORATIVELY OR PROSTHETICALLY DRIVEN !!
Loss of oral structures:A surgical and prosthetic problem
What are the Challenges ?
62
Staged implant surgery: where there is insufficient bone/gingiva quality or quantity, but augmentation potential is good
Implant Borne RestorationsA Restoratively Guided Treatment Plan
Immediate implant surgery: where existing bone/gingiva contours and volume are good, treatment can be expedited
63
2/19/20
22
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
A Restoratively Guided Treatment PlanProvisional Restoration
Cho S et al Compendium 2007;28(11):604-609
64
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Immediate Tooth Replacement??
Dr. Joseph Kan, LLUSchool of Dentistry, Graduate Implant Program
What is the Surgical/Restorative Connection in Dental ImplantTreatmentand How do We Achieve Success?
65
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Immediate Implant PlacementImmediate Tooth Replacement Problems
§ Recession
§ Discoloration
§ Facial Contour
66
2/19/20
23
The Surgical/Restorative Connection:The Critical Zone!
67
The Surgical/Restorative Connection:The Critical Zone!
Sclar A 2003
IMPLANT:
§ Lack of CT
§ Hypovascular, hypocellular zone adjacent to the implant
§ Absence of PDL blood supply
68
The Surgical/Restorative Connection:The Critical Zone!
69
2/19/20
24
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
The socket-shield technique to support the buccofacial
tissues at immediate implant placement
What is the Socket Shield Procedure: Does it Work?The Surgical/Restorative Connection
Gluckman H et al. , International Dentistry Vol.5 No.3 2018
70
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Procedures to Manage Post Extraction Resorption
71
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Literature Review on the Socket Shield Technique
Conclusion: At present the technique is highly promising and holds significant potential for the field of aesthetic and restorative implant dentistry
72
2/19/20
25
Proximal Socket Shield for Inter-implant Papilla Preservation in the Esthetic Zone
The Surgical/Restorative ConnectionWhat is the Socket Shield Procedure: Does it Work?
Kan J & Runcharassaeng K, Int’l J of Perio. & Restor. Dent. Jan 33(1) 2013
73
Proximal Socket Shield for Inter-implant Papilla Preservation in the Esthetic Zone
The Surgical/Restorative Connection
Kan J & Runcharassaeng K, Int’l J of Perio. & Restor. Dent. Jan 33(1) 2013
Conclusions:
§ Maintaining inter-implant papillae is one of the most challenging tasks in anterior implant esthetics
§ The proximal socket shield procedure with immediate implant placement maintains the bone level and dento-gingival fibers attached to the proximal supracrestal cementum
74
Proximal Socket Shield for Inter-implant Papilla Preservation in the Esthetic Zone
The Surgical/Restorative Connection
Kan J & Runcharassaeng K, Int’l J of Perio. & Restor. Dent. Jan 33(1) 2013
Conclusions:
§ This is a technique sensitive procedure
§ There is limited long term evidence
§ Large scale closely monitored studies are needed to validate this procedure
75
2/19/20
26
Platform Switching: Is it Beneficial and Is it Necessary?
76
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Platform Switching for Marginal Bone Preservation Around Dental Implants; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Atieh MA et al. J Periodontol. Oct. 81(10), 2010
CONCLUSIONS:§ The marginal bone loss around platform switched implants was
significantly less than around platform matched implants
§ No statistically significant difference was detected for implant failures between PS and PM implants
§ Subgroup analysis showed that an implant abutment diameter difference > or = 0.4mm was associated with a more favorable bone response
77
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Peri-implant Bone Levels Around Implants With Platform Switched Abutments Preliminary Data From a Prospective Study
Hurzeler M et al. J Oral Maxillofac. Surg. July 65(7 suppl 1) 2007
CONCLUSIONS:§ The concept of platform switching appears to limit crestal
resorption and seems to preserve peri-implant bone levels
§ The reduction of the abutment of 0.45mm on each side (5mm implants and 4.1mm abutment) seems sufficient to avoid peri-implant bone loss
78
2/19/20
27
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Systematic Review: Platform Switch and Dental Implants
Chrcanovic BR et al. J Dent. Jun 43 (6) 2015
CONCLUSIONS:§ There was less marginal bone loss with platform switching than at
implants with platform matching (mean difference 0.29)
§ An increase of the mean difference of MBL between the procedures was observed with: (a) increase in the follow up time and (b) increase of the mismatch between the implant platform and the abutment
79
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Impact of Platform Switching on Marginal Peri-implant Bone Level Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Strietzel F et al. Clin Oral Implants Research 2015
CONCLUSIONS:§ The meta-analysis revealed a significantly less mean MBL change
at implants with a PS compared to PM implant abutment configuration
80
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Impact of Platform Switching on Marginal Peri-implant Bone Level Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Strietzel F et al. Clin Oral Implants Research 2015
CONCLUSIONS:What do we need?
§ Platform switch of at least 0.4mm
§ Strong material for platform switch implant and abutments
§ A very stable conical connection
81
2/19/20
28
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Screw vs. Cement Retained Implant Prosthesis
82
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Choice of retention type might not have a crucial influence on the overall prosthesis but may increase chances of complications
Wittenben JG et al. IJOMI Jan 2:29, 2014
Screw vs. Cement Retained Implant Prosthesis
83
Incorrect m-d implant position results in…
Screw vs. Cement Retained Implant ProsthesisDecision Making Tree
84
2/19/20
29
Predictable Single Tooth Peri-Implant Esthetics: Five Diagnostic Keys
Kois, J. Vol. 22 No. 3 Compendium March 2001
85
Papilla maintenance is determined by the proximal bone on adjacent teeth and not by the tooth to be extracted, i.e., bone level on the tooth side determines the presence of papilla not the implant!!
Strategic Point
86
1. Tooth Position/FGM Coronal2. Gingival Form Flat Scallop3. Biotype Thick4. Tooth Shape Square5. Position of the Osseous Crest:Measures <3mm fromteeth and facially High Crest
SummaryLOW RISK:
87
2/19/20
30
1. Tooth Position/FGM Ideal or Apical2. Gingival Form High Scallop3. Biotype Thin4. Tooth Shape Triangular5. Position of the Osseous Crest:Measures <3mm fromteeth and facially Low Crest
SummaryHIGH RISK:
88