2040 transportation plan - otter tail county, mn...2019/10/22 · transportation plan because it...

Otter Tail County2040 Transportat ion Plan

Better roads for a better Otter Tail… our values, our priorities

Updated October, 2019

Otter Tail County 2040 Transportation Plan Update (2019)

i

Otter Tail County 2040 Transportation Plan Update (2019) INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Overview ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

Stakeholder Involvement Process .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1

EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................................................ 2

Functional Classification ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2

Jurisdictional Classification ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2

Pavement Age .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

Pavement Condition Index ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 5

10 Ton Routes and Shoulder Widths...................................................................................................................................................................... 8

Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................................................................................................................................11

Roadway Capacity Analysis and Congestion ........................................................................................................................................................11

Safety and Crash Analysis .....................................................................................................................................................................................15

FUTURE MULTIMODAL SYSTEM ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................... 19

Future Functional Classification ...........................................................................................................................................................................19

Future Jurisdictional Classification .......................................................................................................................................................................19

FINANCIAL & PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................... 26

System Management .............................................................................................................................................................................................26

Transportation Funding .........................................................................................................................................................................................26

Current Investment Scenario ................................................................................................................................................................................26

Project Identification ..............................................................................................................................................................................................30


ii

Figures Figure 1. Otter Tail County Existing Functional Classification .................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2. Otter Tail County Existing Jurisdictional Classification ................................................................................................................................ 4 Figure 3. Otter Tail County Age of Asphalt Pavement Surfaces ................................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 4. 2017 Pavement Condition ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5. 2017 Pavement Quality Index (PQI) ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 6. Otter Tail County Roadway Weight Limits .................................................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 7. Otter Tail County Roadway Shoulder Widths .............................................................................................................................................10 Figure 8. Otter Tail County Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes (2015) .............................................................................................................12 Figure 9. Perham and Fergus Falls Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes (2015) ...............................................................................................13 Figure 10. Traffic Congestion (Fergus Falls)..............................................................................................................................................................14 Figure 11. Otter Tail County Crashes 2014 – 2019 (Excluding Animal Crashes) ..................................................................................................16 Figure 12. Otter Tail County Fatal Crashes 2014 – 2019 .......................................................................................................................................17 Figure 13. Future Functional Classification ..............................................................................................................................................................20 Figure 14. Future Jurisdictional Classification ..........................................................................................................................................................21 Figure 15. Future Jurisdictional Classification (Cities) .............................................................................................................................................22 Figure 16. Annual Funding Levels..............................................................................................................................................................................27 Figure 17. Projected 2020 PQI by Tier ......................................................................................................................................................................28 Figure 18. Average PQI by Tier in 2028 .....................................................................................................................................................................28 Figure 19. Financial Gap Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................................................29 Figure 20. Otter Tail County 2019-2025 Transportation Program ..........................................................................................................................32


iii

Tables Table 1. Otter Tail County Shoulder Widths ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Table 2. Otter Tail County Planning Level Capacity Thresholds ...............................................................................................................................11 Table 3. Otter Tail County Crash Fatalities and Injuries, 2014 - 2019 ....................................................................................................................15 Table 4. Otter Tail County Fatal Crashes 2014 - 2019 ............................................................................................................................................18 Table 5. Jurisdictional Changes .................................................................................................................................................................................23 Table 6. Summary of Future Roadway /Bridge Preservation Projects ....................................................................................................................31 Table 7. Otter Tail County 2019-2025 Transportation Program ..............................................................................................................................33


1

Introduction Overview The Otter Tail County 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan translates identified issues into specific, actionable initiatives and strategies. The Plan elements were coordinated with other County efforts and those of other key study partners, cities, townships, and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). The initial Plan document was adopted on July 21, 2015.

In an effort to document the most up to date information, Otter Tail County initiated an update in 2018 to their 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. The goal of the update was to understand future project and funding needs in the County. The following sections were included in this update:

• Existing Conditions • Future Multimodal System Analysis • Financial & Performance Analysis

Stakeholder Involvement Process Public participation and agency coordination were important in seeking input on proposed system improvements and building support for the overall Transportation Plan update.

Project Management Team

A Project Management Team (PMT) was established to actively guide the development of the Plan. The team was composed of three County Highway staff. Several PMT meetings were held at strategic intervals throughout the planning process to review technical analyses and provide input on the Plan contents.

Open Houses

Four public open house meetings were held during the planning process. These meetings were conducted to provide stakeholders information on the Transportation Plan update and to seek input on planning or programming concepts. Display boards, presentations, and comment forms were used to engage the public at these meetings. Importantly, the open house format offered an informal venue for citizens, agency staff, and community leaders to ask questions and give their thoughts on the Plan findings and recommendations.


2

Existing Conditions Functional Classification The functional classification system defines both the function and role of a roadway within the hierarchy of an overall roadway system. This system is used to create a roadway network that collects and distributes traffic from neighborhoods and ultimately to the state or interstate highway system. Functional classification planning works to manage mobility, access, and alignment of routes.

Since 2015, there have been minor adjustments to the functional classification of roads in the County. Going forward, the County will adjust the classification of roadways in the county as opportunities arise. Figure 1 displays the existing functional classification system for the County’s roadways.

Jurisdictional Classification The objective of appropriate road jurisdiction planning is to ensure that the management of each roadway is closely aligned with its function and the jurisdiction best suited to maintain it. The jurisdiction of roadways is an important component of the Transportation Plan because it defines the regulatory, maintenance, construction, and financial obligations of each governmental unit.

Since 2015, there have been updates to the jurisdictional classification in Otter Tail County. The City of Fergus Falls and the County agreed to swap municipal streets and County roads in the City to properly align management of the roadways with their intended function. This transfer consisted of 4 miles of city roads being transferred for four miles of county roads. CSAH 1 and CSAH 25 were swapped for MSAS 105, MSAS 104, and MSAS 137.

Figure 2 displays the current jurisdictional classification for the County’s roadways.

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty

Grant County Douglas County

Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

Existing Functional ClassPrincipal ArterialMinor ArterialMajor CollectorMinor CollectorLocalCounty BoundaryRailroadsCentral Lakes State TrailState Aid CitiesNon-State Aid CitiesState Parks

2040 Transportation Plan

[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 1Existing FunctionalClassification

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

Existing Roadway JurisdictionInterstate HighwayUS HighwayState HighwayCounty RoadwaysTownshipCity or OtherCounty BoundaryRailroadsCentral Lakes State TrailState Aid CitiesNon-State Aid CitiesState Parks


[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 2Existing JurisdictionalClassification


5

Pavement Age Almost 60 percent of Otter Tail County’s asphalt roadways are more than 20 years old. According to industry standards, a highway should typically receive an overlay at approximately 15 to 20 years. In Otter Tail County, due to funding constraints, overlay work is spread out to an approximately 30-year average. Figure 3 shows the breakdown of asphalt pavements by age.

Figure 3. Otter Tail County Age of Asphalt Pavement Surfaces

Pavement Condition Index MnDOT State Aid data collection services were used to gather condition data on paved County State Aid Highways (CSAH) and County Highways (CH). This data is collected every two years and entered into the county pavement management data system. The most recently collected data for the County is from 2017.

Data collected and provided by MnDOT to the County includes a Ride Quality Index (RQI), Surface Rating (SR), and a Pavement Quality Index (PQI). The PQI is a composite score that combines the ride quality and surface rating and ranges between 0 and 4.5. The higher the number, the better the condition of the roadway. Otter Tail County uses a modified version of the PQI ratings that converts the range of 0 to 4.5 to a 0 to 100 scale. Using this numerical rating, 0 represents a failed roadway and 100 represents a newly surface roadway with no distress. Figure 4 shows the percent of the paved roadways that fell into each category in 2017. Figure 5 presents the 2017 PQI data by roadway segment across the County.

Beginning in 2017, MnDOT changed the way they perform pavement condition surveys. In previous survey years, a sampling procedure was followed in which approximately 10 percent of the pavement surface was reviewed manually. Distresses collected within that 10 percent were then extrapolated to the entire segment area. The new process includes a review of 100 percent of the pavement surface using an automated software program that detects surface distress. This change in procedure had an impact on the PQI data for Otter Tail County and the rest of the state. The data collected in 2017 showed an improvement in the PQI for many of the County’s roadways, despite maintenance work not being performed.

0 - 5 yrs, 14%

6 - 10 yrs, 11%

11 - 15 yrs, 6%16 - 20

yrs, 14%

21 - 25 yrs, 12%

26 - 30 yrs, 16%

> 30 yrs, 26%


6

Moving forward, as MnDOT continues to follow the new rating procedure, the data will be used to determine if adjustments should be made to the County’s PQI goals, preservation strategies and future project list.

Figure 4. 2017 Pavement Condition

25%

70%

5%

Very Good (80-100)

Good (60-79)

Fair (40-59)

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

PQI RangeVery Good (80-100)Good (60-79)Fair (40-59)Poor (20-39)

Roadway JurisdictionStateCountyTownshipCity or OtherCounty BoundaryRailroadsCentral Lakes State TrailState Aid CitiesNon-State Aid CitiesState Parks


[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 5Pavement Quality Index


8

10 Ton Routes and Shoulder Widths Otter Tail County considers the weight capacity and roadway/shoulder width as an important metric when evaluation the condition and quality of their system. Both of these metrics greatly affect freight travel and safety throughout the County.

The roadway weight limits for the entire County system are shown in Figure 6. Since 2015, the County has upgraded portions of the following eleven county roadways to 10 Ton Routes:

• CSAH 1 • CSAH 4 • CSAH 8 • CSAH 9 (One Section is now a 9 Ton Route) • CSAH 10 • CSAH 12 • CSAH 16 • CSAH 24 • CSAH 27 • CSAH 35 • CSAH 67

Table 1 provides a summary of the shoulder widths for the County roadway system. Figure 7 shows the updated map of the shoulder widths for the County’s roadway system. The following is a list of the roadways with sections that have updated their shoulder widths since 2015:

• CSAH 1 • CSAH 8 • CSAH 9 • CSAH 27 • CSAH 35 • CSAH 38

Table 1. Otter Tail County Shoulder Widths

SHOULDER WIDTH (FEET)

PERCENT OF COUNTY SYSTEM

2' or Less 32%3' to 4' 52%5' to 6' 8%7' to 10' 7%Greater than 10' 1%

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

Road Weight Limits10 Ton9 Ton8 Ton or LowerLocal RoadsCounty BoundaryRailroadsCentral Lakes State TrailState Aid CitiesNon-State Aid CitiesState Parks


[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 6Weight Limits

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

Shoulder Width (Feet)< 23 - 45 - 67 - 10> 10



[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 7 Shoulder Widths


11

Traffic Volumes An evaluation of existing corridor operations was completed to gain a greater understanding of the key travel patterns and congested travel conditions within the County. In an effort to evaluate traffic operations within Otter Tail County, it is critical to understand existing traffic volumes on major roadways.

Figure 8 displays the existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes on the County’s roadways and Figure 9 shows the ADT volumes in Perham and Fergus Falls, using the most recent data published by MnDOT (2015).

Roadway Capacity Analysis and Congestion Typical planning-level capacity thresholds, as shown in Table 2, were used to evaluate current roadway capacities for all facility types. An analysis of roadway segments with congestion or operational problems is critical in the identification of system needs and/or future roadway improvements.

The volume ranges and capacity thresholds are based on guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual and professional engineering judgment. ADT ranges are used to estimate the maximum capacity of roadway designs; however, it is important to note that a capacity threshold is a theoretical measure that can be affected by functional classification, peak traffic flows, access spacing, speed, and other roadway characteristics.

Congestion and operational problems were evaluated by determining the ratio of current traffic volume to roadway capacity (v/c ratio). Capacity is defined by the following:

• Approaching Capacity – Observed daily volumes exceed 85 percent of the daily capacity (v/c > 0.85)

• At or Exceeding Capacity – Observed daily volumes exceed 100 percent of the daily capacity (v/c > 1.0)

Based on current traffic volumes, there are a few roadways with in the City of Fergus Falls with capacity issues as shown in Figure 10

Table 2. Otter Tail County Planning Level Capacity Thresholds

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

0

90

60

607560

60

85

280

710

320

570

200

460

190300

690510

460

550

990

215

260

670

330

240

495520

160600

120

235

650465

345

710

380

920

365210

240820

620

790

260

800470

390

750

690

250

205680

345610 380

630300

275

510

870155

610580640

250

320950

195195 115

250

215600

305

650 830315100

330

140

175

290

215140

810

360

185 600

440

185

135245

320

490

145 430

485 850295

160

170

285295

100

100

205210

170

205

110

300175

155

175560

170

195

710155

115270

410

150

600

425

170

235

105

230

140155

810355

540

980

980

680

740

520

600

530

730820

800290

770

530

345

4,000

1,300

1,100

3,1005,400

7,600

1,450

1,650

9,0003,100

1,250

3,0001,950

1,500

3,700

1,050

1,550

1,100

1,000

1,000

1,800

1,300

3,050

2,1501,450

1,5001,300

1,250

4,500

1,850

1,250

1,300

1,200

2,0001,300

1,150

8,000

1,100

1,300

1,150

2,700

17,100

18,200


[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 8Traffic Volumes

Trunk Highways - 2017 County Roads/Highways - 2015


Traffic Count Data

)m

G½WX

G¦WX

Perham

GgWX

GÚWX

8,000

6,7001,550

2,550

6,0003,250

2,250

Existing Traffic VolumeTraffic Count Data



[0 0.75 1.5

Miles

Figure 9Traffic Volume (2015)Perham and Fergus Falls

?}A@

G|WX

Fergus Falls

GâWX

GWX

18,200

2,200

195

17,100

5601,500

14,000

1,950

120

5,4003,100

4,000

7,200

0 1 2Miles

Fergus Falls

?}A@

G¡WX

GWX

GrWX

G|WXGâWX

?}A@

GàWX

GoWX

GWX

GzWX

GÜWXG¡WX

G¥WX

GzWX

!"b$

!"b$

(9,000)

(9,00

0)

(14,000)

(12,20

0)

Fir Ave

Union

Ave



[0 0.85 1.70.425

Miles

Approaching Capacity(0.85 - 1.0 V/C)Over Capacity(> 1.0 V/C)

Existing Congestion

Figure 10Traffic CongestionFergus Falls


15

Safety and Crash Analysis Roadway safety is an important issue for County officials and a high priority for MnDOT, local agencies, and the public. In addition to the data provided in this update, Otter Tail County has a County Road Safety Plan that documents at-risk locations and identifies cost-effective safety improvement strategies that Otter Tail County can complete once funding becomes available.

Updated crash frequency and severity maps (see Figure 11 and 12) and tables (see Table 3 and 4) were completed using data provided by MnDOT for the most recently five-year period (2014-2019). The following are the key takeaways from this analysis:

• There were a total of 3,382 crashes recorded for all roadways within the County (not including animal crashes), 1,005 of these crashes resulted in an injury or fatality.

• There were 674 crashes located on a County Road (20 percent), 36 of these crashes resulted in an injury or fatality.

• There were a total of 24 crashes that resulted in a fatality within the County, six of these crashes were on a County Road.

Table 3. Otter Tail County Crash Fatalities and Injuries, 2014 - 2019

YEAR FATALITIES INJURIES2014 3 1912015 8 2052016 1 2302017 7 2232018 4 2092019 1 39

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

nty

Wade

na C

ounty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

Sð GWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

Crashes 2014-2019Fatal- 24Serious Injury- 87Minor Injury- 425Possible Injury- 469Property Damage- 2,377



[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 11Otter Tail County Crashes Since 2014 – 2019(Excluding Animal Crashes)

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r )m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glenda lough

Inspiration Peak

""X

""D

""E

""F""A

""M

""G

""T

""H""I

""N""U

""O

""V

""P

""Q

""R

""S

""B

""C""L

""W

""J

""K

Fatal Crash DataFatal- 24



[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 12Otter Tail CountyFatal Crashes 2014 – 2019

Fatal ID Route Month Day Year TimeNumber of Fatalities

Number of Vehicles

LocationWeather

ConditionsContributing Factor Crash Location

A US 10 September 29 2014 12:00 PM 1 1 Gorman Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Ran Off Road-Right Side Clear Unknown On Roadway

B CSAH 31 July 3 2014 8:37 PM 1 1 Dunn Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Ran Off Road-Right Side Unknown Chemical Impairment On Roadway

C I-94 May 10 2014 1:14 PM 1 2 Buse Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Other Cloudy No Clear Contributing Action On Roadway

D Tadpole Rd February 5 2015 9:27 AM 1 1 Corliss Township Non-Collision-Embank/Ditch/CRB Ran Off Road-Left Side Clear Over-correcting / Over Steering Off Roadway, Roadside

E E FIR AVE March 18 2015 4:18 PM 1 2 City of Fergus Falls Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Head-On Rain Chemical Impairment On Roadway

F CSAH 4 August 9 2015 11:25 AM 1 2 Lida Township Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Left Angle Clear Unknown On Roadway

G I-94 March 20 2015 2:47 PM 1 1 Fergus Falls Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Ran Off Road-Right Side Cloudy Inattentive/Distraction (Talking, Eating, etc.) On Roadway

H E 14th ST September 28 2015 7:26 AM 1 1 City of Fergus Falls Collision With-Pedestrian Head-On Clear No Clear Contributing Action On Roadway

I MN 210 October 14 2015 3:17 AM 1 2 Clitherall Township Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Head-On Clear Improper Passing On Roadway

J MN 210 October 24 2015 5:42 AM 1 2 City of Fergus Falls Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Left Turn Clear Failure to Yield Right-of-Way On Roadway

K I-94 June 23 2015 4:11 AM 2 1 Tumuli Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Ran Off Road-Left Side Clear Over-correcting / Over Steering On Median

L CSAH 65 June 28 2016 10:25 AM 1 1 Folden Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Other Clear No Clear Contributing Action On Roadway

M MN 29 February 5 2017 9:18 AM 2 2 Deer Creek Township Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Front To Front Clear Operated Vehicle in Careless, Negligent, or Erratic Manner On Roadway

N CSAH 80 June 19 2017 2:35 AM 1 4 Perham Township Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Rear To Side Clear Failed to Keep in Proper Lane On Roadway

O MN 29 November 1 2017 3:09 AM 1 2 Elmo Township Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Front To Front Snow No Clear Contributing Action On Roadway

P 450TH ST August 26 2017 8:05 PM 1 1 Pine Lake Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Other Clear Operated Vehicle in Careless, Negligent, or Erratic Manner Off Roadway, Location Unknown

Q MN 210 April 13 2017 1:00 AM 1 2 Folden Township Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Front To Front Fog/Smog/Smoke Operated Vehicle in Careless, Negligent, or Erratic Manner On Roadway

R US 10 April 26 2017 2:51 AM 1 1 City of Fergus Falls Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Other Cloudy Ran Off Road On Roadway

S CSAH 1 May 17 2017 6:55 AM 1 1 Buse Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Other Cloudy Ran Off Road On Roadside

T I-94 April 27 2018 12:38 AM 1 2 Tumuli Township Collision With-Motor Vehicle in Transport Front To Rear Clear No Clear Contributing Action On Roadway

U 470TH AVE December 19 2018 1:35 AM 1 1 Pine Lake Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Other Cloudy Over-correcting / Over Steering On Roadway

V I-94 September 11 2018 6:22 PM 1 1 City of Fergus Falls Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Other Clear Operated Vehicle in Reckless or Aggressive Manner On Median

W CR-111 July 28 2018 11:40 AM 1 1 Aurdal Township Non-Collision-Overturn/Rollover Other Clear Ran Off Road On Roadway

X MN 210 March 11 2019 12:59 AM 1 3 Carlisle Township Collision With-Parked Motor Vehicle Other Fog/Smog/Smoke Operated Vehicle in Careless, Negligent, or Erratic Manner On Roadway

Crash Type

Table 4. Otter Tail County Fatal Crashes 2014 - 2019


19

Future Multimodal System Analysis Future Functional Classification The future functional classification analysis was developed to address Otter Tail County’s future system needs, especially as they pertain to system preservation issues. It was completed by evaluating the current functional classification system, assessing anticipated changes in land use and development patterns, addressing inconsistencies and misaligned routes related to established guidelines, and providing appropriate connections to adjacent counties.

The recommendations of the plan created in 2015 are being carried forward in this update as recommended updates to the functional classification. These changes will help to create a system that meets the goals of the community and provides for an optimal transportation system. Figure 13 shows the recommended 2040 functional classification of roadways throughout the County.

Future Jurisdictional Classification The goal of the Otter Tail County jurisdiction realignment analysis was to match the management of roadways with their intended future function and with the jurisdiction best suited to maintain them. The result is an efficient and economical use of citizen tax dollars and an appropriately aligned county highway system. Jurisdictional realignment (reducing county system size) was one of the specific system preservation strategies identified by the County Board that the Plan should investigate.

Jurisdictional transfers have been completed in Fergus Falls, but there are additional transfers suggested across the county. Additional transfers beyond these can help to right size the roadways throughout the County and allow the County to better manage and fund improvements. These suggested jurisdictional transfers are shown in Figure 14, Figure 15, and Table 5.

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

37

22

40

25

4

8

39

24

273

21

29

35

3630

2

31

15

12

14

19

23

5

7

28

18

26

33

38 13

32

17

16

34

11

9

1

20

10

6

Future FunctionalClassification by 2040

Principal ArterialMinor ArterialMajor CollectorMinor CollectorLocalProposed Changes

County BoundaryRailroadsCentral Lakes State TrailState Aid CitiesNon-State Aid CitiesState Parks


[0 5 102.5

Miles

# Route Identification

Figure 13Future Functional Classification

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilik

in Co

unty


Todd

Cou

nty

Wade

na C

ounty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

Sð GWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

52

23

9

27 18

25

12

19

16

28

17

21

22

26

24

6

38

10

36

14

41

37

50

29

32

20

4049

34

11

15

43

5

44

53

5113

33

42

45

31

7

30

39

4 35

8

Future RoadwayJurisdiction by 2040

Interstate HighwayUS HighwayState HighwayCounty RoadwaysTownshipCity or OtherLocalProposed Change



[0 5 102.5

Miles


Figure 14Future JurisdictionalClassification

GhWX

?aA@

)r

2528

Future RoadwayJurisdiction by 2040

Interstate HighwayUS HighwayState HighwayCounty RoadwaysTownshipCity or OtherLocalProposed Change



[0 0.6 1.20.3

Miles


?}A@

G¡WX

!"b$

GoWX

?}A@

GâWX G|WX

GWX

GWX

-T111

)mGÍWX

GÂWX

18

1723

)m

?êA@

G½WX

G¦WX

GgWX

26 614

15

Figure 15Future Jurisdictional Classification (Cities)

Pelican Rapids Fergus Falls

New York Mills Perham

Existing Jurisdiction

Future Jurisdiction

State County Township CityExisting

Functional ClassFuture

Functional Class

1 CSAH 1 CSAH MSAS 1.2 -1.2 1.2 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 3,850 7 Transfer to be completed in 2019



4 CH 121 CSAH Western Township 5.0 -5.0 5.0 Rural Local Rural Local 60 7 Short route / No continuity / Low ADT

5 CSAH 48 CSAH Woodside Township 3.0 -3.0 3.0 Rural Local Rural Local 85 7 Short route / Limited continuity / Low ADT

6 CSAH 51 CSAH City of Perham 0.1 -0.1 0.1 Minor Collector Minor Collector 1,600 - Short route / Limited connectivity / Route spans less than one mile

7 CSAH 58 CSAHHomestead & Blowers

Township9.1 -9.1 9.1 Rural Local Rural Local 140 7 Limited east-west connectivity / indirect, circuitous route

8 CSAH 62 CSAH Butler & Paddock Township 4.9 -4.9 4.9 Rural Local Rural Local 190 7 Limited east-west connectivity

9 CSAH 65 CSAH City of Henning 0.8 -0.8 0.8 Rural Local Rural Local 840 - Limited north-south connectivity

10 CSAH 67 CSAH City of Henning 1.5 -1.5 1.5 Rural Local Rural Local 1,050 7 Limited local connectivity / Short route

11 CSAH 71 CSAH Eastern Township 1.9 -1.9 1.9 Rural Local Rural Local 200 7 Short route / indirect, circuitous route

12 CSAH 77 CSAH City of Bluffton 0.3 -0.3 0.3 Minor Collector Minor Collector 310 9 Low ADT / Limited connectivity / Serves local trips / Route spans less than one mile

13 CSAH 79 CSAH Parkers Prairie Township 3.3 -3.3 3.3 Rural Local Rural Local 155 7 Short route / Limited continuity / Low ADT

14 CSAH 80 CSAH City of Perham 1.7 -1.7 1.7 Major Collector Major Collector 8,800 10 Limited connectivity / Serves local trips

15 CSAH 80 CSAH Perham Township 4.2 -4.2 4.2 Major Collector Major Collector 3,550 10 Limited connectivity / Serves local trips

16 CSAH 81 CSAH Eagle Lake Township 6.1 -6.1 6.1 Rural Local Rural Local 175 7 Segment provides limited connectivity / Low ADT

17 CSAH 84 CSAH Newton Township 1.3 -1.3 1.3 Rural Local Rural Local 1,300 10 Limited connectivity / Serves local trips / Short segment

18 CSAH 84 CSAH City of New York Mills 1.0 -1.0 1.0 Rural Local Rural Local 2,300 10 Limited connectivity / Serves local trips

19 CSAH 89 CSAH City of Battle Lake 1.3 -1.3 1.3 Rural Local Rural Local 1,100 7 Limited local connectivity / Short route

20 CSAH 89 CSAH Everts Township 0.4 -0.4 0.4 Rural Local Rural Local 205 7 Limited local connectivity / Short route / Route spans less than one mile

21 CSAH 90 CSAH City of Battle Lake 0.3 -0.3 0.3 Rural Local Rural Local 650 - Limited local connectivity / Short route / Route spans less than one mile

22 CSAH 91 CSAH City of Dent 0.1 -0.1 0.1 Rural Local Rural Local 570 - Limited local connectivity / Short route / Route spans less than one mile

23 CSAH 94 CSAH City of New York Mills 0.1 -0.1 0.1 Rural Local Rural Local 920 - Limited local connectivity / Short route / Route spans less than one mile

24 CSAH 95 CSAH City of Parkers Prairie 0.1 -0.1 0.1 Rural Local Rural Local 580 - Limited local connectivity / Short route / Route spans less than one mile

Table 5. Otter Tail County Proposed Future Roadway Jurisdiction Changes

Weight Limit (Tons)

Rationale# Route

Jurisdiction

Length

Net Miles Gained/Lost Functional ClassificationExisting

ADT

Transfer from County to Fergus Falls

Transfer from County (CSAH) to City/Township


Future Jurisdiction



Functional Class


Weight Limit (Tons)

Rationale# Route

Jurisdiction

Length


ADT

25 CSAH 96 CSAH City of Pelican Rapids 0.2 -0.2 0.2 Rural Local Rural Local 1,600 - Limited local connectivity / Short route / Route spans less than one mile

26 CSAH 98 CSAH City of Perham 0.2 -0.2 0.2 Rural Local Rural Local 2,000 - Limited local connectivity / Short route / Route spans less than one mile

27 CSAH 99 CSAH City of Richville 0.1 -0.1 0.1 Rural Local Rural Local 375 - Limited local connectivity / Short route / Route spans less than one mile

28 CSAH 100 CSAH City of Pelican Rapids 0.3 -0.3 0.3 Rural Local Rural Local 650 - Short route / Limited continuity / Low ADT / Route spans less than one mile

29 CSAH 22 CSAH Elizabeth Township 3.4 -3.4 3.4 Rural Local Rural Local 650 - Limited local connectivity / Short route

30 CH 110 CH Aastad Township 5.0 -5.0 5.0 Rural Local Rural Local 95 7 Short route / No continuity / Low ADT

31 CH 112 CH Western & Aastad Township 3.9 -3.9 3.9 Rural Local Rural Local 135 7 Short route / indirect, circuitous route

32 CH 117 CH St. Olaf Township 5.0 -5.0 5.0 Rural Local Rural Local 185 7 Short route / indirect, circuitous route

33 CH 118 CH Oscar & Elizabeth Township 3.4 -3.4 3.4 Rural Local Rural Local 130 7 Short, discontinuous east-west route

34 CH 123 CH Edna Township 2.9 -2.9 2.9 Rural Local Rural Local 205 7 Short route / No continuity / Low ADT

35 CH 126 CH St. Olaf & Eagle Lake Township 4.2 -4.2 4.2 Rural Local Rural Local 105 9 Short route / indirect, circuitous route

36 CH 130 CH Candor Township 1.6 -1.6 1.6 Rural Local Rural Local 260 7 Short, discontinuous east-west route

37 CH 131 CH Edna Township 1.5 -1.5 1.5 Rural Local Rural Local 100 - Short route / Limited continuity / Low ADT

38 CH 134 CHElmo, Folden, Henning & Inman

Townships7.0 -7.0 7.0 Rural Local Rural Local 130 7 Short route / Limited continuity / Low ADT

39 CH 135 CH Newton & Deer Creek Township 3.1 -3.1 3.1 Rural Local Rural Local 115 9 Short route / Limited continuity / Low ADT

40 CH 136 CH Elmo Township 7.4 -7.4 7.4 Rural Local Rural Local 105 7 Low ADT / Limited connectivity / Serves local trips

41 CH 138 CHWoodside, Eastern & Parkers

Prairie Township7.2 -7.2 7.2 Rural Local Rural Local 115 7 Short route / No continuity / Low ADT

42 CH 139 CH Parkers Prairie Township 0.7 -0.7 0.7 Rural Local Rural Local 40 7 Short route / No continuity / Low ADT

43 CH 140 CH Inman Township 4.2 -4.2 4.2 Rural Local Rural Local 145 7 Short route / Limited continuity / Low ADT

44 CH 146 CH Corliss Township 3.0 -3.0 3.0 Rural Local Rural Local 95 5 Limited east-west connectivity / indirect, circuitous route / low weight limit

45 CH 148 CH Butler Township 1.8 -1.8 1.8 Rural Local Rural Local 100 7 Short, discontinuous east-west route / low ATD

Transfer from County (CR) to Township


Future Jurisdiction



Functional Class


Weight Limit (Tons)

Rationale# Route

Jurisdiction

Length


ADT

46 MSAS 125 MSAS CSAH 2.0 2.0 -2.0 Local/Minor Arterial Local/Minor Arterial 6,900 - Transfer to be completed in 2019

47 MSAS 104 MSAS CSAH 1.3 1.3 -1.3 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 4,450 10 Transfer to be completed in 2019

48 MSAS 137 MSAS CSAH 1.0 1.0 -1.0 Minor Arterial Minor Arterial 9,300 10 Transfer to be completed in 2019

49 170th Street Buse Township CH 4.3 4.3 -4.3Rural Minor

CollectorRural Minor

Collector- 7 Creates continuous, sub-regional east-west route

50 250th StreetSverdrup & Everts

TownshipCH 2.6 2.6 -2.6

Rural Minor Collector

Rural Minor Collector

- 0 Creates continuous, sub-regional east-west route

51 625th Avenue Eastern Township CSAH 1.2 1.2 -1.2 Rural LocalRural Minor

Collector- 7 Creates sub-regional north-south mobility / provides more direct route

52 Jewett Lake Road Elizabeth Township CSAH 1.8 1.8 -1.8 Rural LocalRural Minor

Collector- 0 Creates sub-regional east-west mobility / provides more direct route

53 Reed Creek Road Elizabeth Township CSAH 2.2 2.2 -2.2 Rural LocalRural Minor

Collector- 0 Creates sub-regional east-west mobility / provides more direct route

Transfer from Township to County (CSAH)

Transfer from Fergus Falls to County (CSAH)

Transfer from Township to County (CR)


26

Financial & Performance Analysis The main objective of this analysis was to determine how the County’s maintenance practices and current level of funding would affect the condition of the system over time.

System Management Pavement management is the process of timing roadway maintenance to prolong pavement life and optimize funding. Current pavement conditions were evaluated to gain a better understanding of current pavement conditions to aid in the identification of potential needs.

Since the completion of the Transportation Plan in 2015, Otter Tail County implemented a tiered preservation system to optimize how funding is allocated for their paved roadways. The system priorities include: preventing “fair” condition roads from falling into “poor condition” by avoiding a worst-first approach and to prioritize preservation strategies over reconstruction fixes. The tiered preservation system has helped optimize funding for highly used roads throughout the County, however there are roads in the system that are below their pavement quality goals.

Transportation Funding Since the completion of the Transportation Plan in 2015, Otter Tail County has implemented a wheelage tax and a local option sales tax. Funds from both sources are used for pavement preservation and management.

Additionally, Otter Tail County is seeking new funding opportunities and continues to review future projects on an annual basis.

Current Investment Scenario The County currently spends approximately $14.4 million (average over the next 10 years) per year for the reconstruction and maintenance of the pavement network. At this level of funding, the overall average Pavement Quality Index (PQI) is expected to decay from an average of 73 to an average of 61 in 10 years.

Figure 16 provides a graphical depiction of the County’s current annual funding, plus funding generated by the wheelage and sales tax options. In 2020, the county is projected to have $28.3 million in funding for all pavement preservation and reconstruction projects. This drops to $13.3 million in 2021 because funding from bonds are no longer contributing to the program and there is less state aid money available.


27

Figure 16. Annual Funding Levels

$0

$4,000,000

$8,000,000

$12,000,000

$16,000,000

$20,000,000

$24,000,000

$28,000,000

2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039

State Aid Wheelage Tax Sales Tax (double by 2039) Bonding Federal Aid Bridge


28

Current Pavement Condition by Tier

As mentioned previously, the County funds its preservation projects based on its Tiered Preservation System. The County has set PQI goals for each tier within the Tiered Preservation System. The projected 2020 PQI for each tier is shown in Figure 17 along with the goal established for each tier. Overall, the system is projected to be very close to its goals for each tier in 2020.

Figure 17. Projected 2020 PQI by Tier

Projected Pavement Condition by Tier

The 2028 average PQI by tier as compared to the goal set for each is presented in Figure 18. As shown, only the platinum roadways will meet their set PQI goal under the current investment scenario. In order to meet the PQI goals for all roadway tiers, additional funding is necessary or an adjustment to the tiered preservation strategy is needed.

Figure 18. Average PQI by Tier in 2028

Financial Gap

As shown above, the PQI goals established by the County will not be met under the current investment scenario. In order to meet these goals, it was estimated that an additional $7 million is needed each year, on average, for the next 10 years. This is displayed in Figure 19.

It should also be noted that the 2017 PQI data for the County showed an overall improvement in the system due to the new rating process being used by MnDOT. Following MnDOT’s two-year survey cycle, the County will be receiving 2019 PQI data from MnDOT sometime in 2020. That data set will provide a second condition data point that follows the new rating process. This will provide a better understanding of the current rating process and pavement condition trends within the County. Depending on that data, the funding gap may or may not be larger than currently shown. However, it should be noted that the gap will continue to increase each year as pavement conditions deteriorate and the cost of preservation projects increases.

63 (Goal 60)

69 (Goal 70)

74 (Goal 75)

77 (Goal 80)

0 20 40 60 80 100

Bronze

Silver

Gold

Platinum

40 (Goal 60)

51 (Goal 70)

66 (Goal 75)

83 (Goal 80)

0 20 40 60 80 100

Bronze

Silver

Gold

Platinum


29

Figure 19. Financial Gap Analysis

$-

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

$30,000

$35,000

$40,000

2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039

Current Funding $K Gap $K


30

Project Identification During the creation of the Transportation Plan in 2015, a number of future system improvements were identified for Otter Tail County. Many of these projects were completed and the remaining projects identified in the plan are recommended for completion in this update. The current County Improvement Plan (CIP) goes through 2025 and a summary of this plan is in Table 6. Projects were categorized as either a bridge, reconstruction, resurfacing, or seal coat project.

Multimodal Transportation

Multimodal transportation projects, including bicycling, walking and others, are identified and planned in the 2017 County-Wide Trail Master Plan. The Plan will recommend and prioritize trail projects for future programming decisions, either as independent projects, or in concert with scheduled and appropriate highway projects.

Future Program of Projects

Using the tiered preservation system, established performance targets, the County’s pavement management system, the previously identified list of project needs and updated revenue forecasts, County staff prioritized various pavement, bridge, safety, etc. projects. This program of projects is expected to be implemented over the next seven years.

It is understood that the County staff and County Board will annually review the program’s progress, evaluate the current funding situation, and prepare both an annual and an updated long-term CIP. The prioritization process, the draft CIP and project maps will be presented to the public for comment and revisions prior to each programming year. The current Transportation Program project list is illustrated on Figure 20 and shown in Table 7.


31

Table 6. Summary of Future Roadway /Bridge Preservation Projects

PROGRAM COST BY TYPE OF WORK ($1,000)

YEAR

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

PLA

TIN

UM

BRIDGE $710 $1,490 RECONSTRUCTION $8,930 $8,364 $3,905 $4,821 $3,854 RESURFACING $3,081 $4,619 $4,788 $4,559 $4,081 $7,950 $7,587

SEAL COST $823 $641 $541 $695 $878 $1,484 $937

GO

LD

BRIDGE $317

RECONSTRUCTION $4,497 $1,721

RESURFACING $1,099 $4,844 $3,066 SEAL COST $646 $567 $218 $624 $411

SIL

VE

R

BRIDGE $1,071 $750 $500

RECONSTRUCTION $461 $2,137

RESURFACING $725 SEAL COST $111 $319 $4 $54 $86

BR

ON

ZE

BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION RESURFACING $748 $2,979 SEAL COST $32 $216

!"b$

!"b$

)r

)r)m

)m

?}A@

?}A@?}A@

?êA@

?êA@

?êA@

?}A@

?ÿA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÂA@

?ÆA@

?aA@?aA@

?aA@

Becker County

Clay County

Wilki

n Cou

nty


Todd

Cou

ntyWa

dena

Cou

nty

G¢WX

GhWX

G£WX

Lake Lida

Otter Tail Lake

West Battle Lake

Rush Lake

Dead Lake

Big Pine Lake

Pelican Lake

Tenmile Lake

GyWX GyWX

GbWXGvWX

G|WXGuWX

GâWXGiWX

G|WX

GWX

GWX

)r

Sê

GaWX

GaWX

GoWX

GWX

G¥WXG¡WX G§WX

G§WXG©WX

G¹WX

GkWX

GÜWX

G§WXG³WX

GWX

GrWX

GnWXG¤WX

GÔWX

Sí

GÝWX

SïGdWX

GªWX

GdWX

GpWX

GªWX

SðGWXGÏWX

GÑWX

G±WX

G¬WX

G¬WX

GÅWX

GáWX

GeWX

GËWX

GÕWX

GÓWX

G¼WX

?aA@

G¼WX

?aA@ G¾WX

G×WX

GÇWX

GÀWXGÍWX

GnWX

GÕWX

GÖWX

GÎWXGsWX

GsWX

GÍWX

GgWXGgWX

G¿WX

GlWX

GÆWX

G½WX

G§WXGßWX

G¦WX

GWX

GqWX

GcWX

GcWX

G°WX

G»WXGÂWX

Fergus Falls

WadenaOttertail

Perham

Henning

Deer Creek

BlufftonRothsay

Vergas

Vining

Pelican Rapids

Frazee

Richville

Battle Lake

Urbank

New York Mills

Parkers Prairie

Erhard

Dent

Underwood

Elizabeth

Dalton

Clitherall

Maplewood

Glendalough

Inspiration Peak

Bridge Projects (Year)20202021202220232025

Road Projects (Year)2019202020212022202320242025

Type of WorkReconstructionResurfacingSeal CoatCounty BoundaryRailroadsState Aid CitiesNon-State Aid CitiesState Parks


[0 5 102.5

Miles

Figure 20Otter Tail County2019-2025Transportation Program

GISID Year Route From To Tier Length (mi) Type of WorkUpdated Cost

$KCurrent ADT (2015)

601-030 2019 CSAH 1 I 94 0.2 MI N Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.01 2,500

125-003 2019 CSAH 1 TOWER ROAD - CSAH 15 WESTSIDE DRIVE Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.53 4,500

125-004 2019 CSAH 1 WESTSIDE DRIVE OTTERTAIL DRIVE Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $5.03 4,500

125-005 2019 CSAH 1 TOWER ROAD - OTTERTAIL DRIVE WESTERN AVE. Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $7.30 4,500

125-007 2019 CSAH 1 TOWER ROAD - WESTERN AVE. LINCOLN AVE. Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $3.07 4,500

104-110 2019 CSAH 1 FIR AVE. - TOWER ROAD TH297 (WEST JCT.) Platinum 0.4 Resurfacing $200.75 4,350

104-100 2019 CSAH 1 TH297 (WEST JCT.) UNION AVE. Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $55.76 6,400

601-160 2019 CSAH 1 0.1 MI E OF CSAH 10 CSAH 35 Platinum 5.7 Reconstruction $6,565.74 2,400

601-180 2019 CSAH 1 1.9 M S OF AMOR 0.8 MI E JCT CSAH 14 Platinum 5.0 Seal Coat $88.52 1,300

608-050 2019 CSAH 8 CSAH 53 0.1 M E OF CSAH 53 Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $1.63 640

608-051 2019 CSAH 8 0.1 MI E CSAH 53 CSAH 67 Platinum 4.9 Seal Coat $79.69 640

608-060 2019 CSAH 8 CSAH 67 CSAH 19 W JCT Platinum 4.6 Seal Coat $81.61 610

608-070 2019 CSAH 8 W JCT OF CSAH 19 E CO LINE Platinum 4.7 Seal Coat $83.38 950

609-010 2019 CSAH 9 TH 59 N LIM OF PELICAN RAPIDS Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $7.32 2,000

609-020 2019 CSAH 9 NO LIM PELICAN RAPIDS TH 34 Platinum 5.0 Seal Coat $88.70 1,300

625-023 2019 CSAH 25 0.3 MI S OF INT 94 INT 94 Silver 0.3 Seal Coat $6.21 335

631-040 2019 CSAH 31 TH 59 1.7 MI NORTH Platinum 1.7 Seal Coat $27.65 400

631-050 2019 CSAH 31 1.7 MI N OF TH 59 CSAH 20 Platinum 1.4 Seal Coat $22.77 790

646-020 2019 CSAH 46 SOO LINE RR 0.16 MI E Platinum 0.2 Resurfacing $40.89 800

646-030 2019 CSAH 46 0.16 MI E OF SOO LINE RR E LIM PARKERS PRAIRIE Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $23.00 800

Table 7. Otter Tail County 2019-2025 Transportation Program

2019

Page 1 of 18




646-040 2019 CSAH 46 E LIM PARKERS PRAIRIE 3.1 MI E Platinum 3.1 Resurfacing $792.21 800

646-050 2019 CSAH 46 3.1 MI 3.7 MI E OF E LIM PARKERS PRAIRIE Platinum 0.6 Resurfacing $174.24 590

646-060 2019 CSAH 46 3.7 MI E OF E LIM PARKERS PRAIRIE CSAH 69 Platinum 1.7 Resurfacing $434.44 300

646-070 2019 CSAH 46 CSAH 69 E CO LINE Gold 4.3 Resurfacing $1,098.87 300

661-010 2019 CSAH 61 CSAH 16 5.9 MI NORTH Silver 5.9 Seal Coat $104.67 160

682-040 2019 CSAH 82 N RAMP FAI 94 S LIMS FERGUS FALLS Platinum 2.6 Seal Coat $103.78 2,200

682-050 2019 CSAH 82 S LIMS FERGUS FALLS TH 210 Platinum 2.0 Seal Coat $125.16 5,200

104-120 2019 CSAH 88 FIR AVE. - TOWER ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD. Platinum 0.4 Resurfacing $238.31 4,350

104-130 2019 CSAH 88 FIR AVE. - INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD. MARYLAND LANE Platinum 0.3 Resurfacing $188.18 4,350

104-140 2019 CSAH 88 FIR AVE. - MARYLAND LANE NORTH CITY LIMITS Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $69.02 4,350

688-010 2019 CSAH 88 LIMS FERGUS FALLS W RAMP FAI 94 Platinum 3.1 Resurfacing $864.23 2,800

688-020 2019 CSAH 88 FAI 94 JCT CSAH 10 Platinum 5.0 Seal Coat $88.70 600

689-010 2019 CSAH 89 TH 78 0.94 MI N Platinum 0.9 Reconstruction $1,939.97 820

689-020 2019 CSAH 89 0.94 MI N OF TH 78 N LIM BATTLE LAKE Platinum 0.3 Reconstruction $424.28 230

689-030 2019 CSAH 89 N LIM BATTLE LAKE CSAH 16 Silver 0.4 Reconstruction $460.75 230

137-010 2020 CSAH 1 FIR AVE.- UNION TH 297 (EAST JCT.) Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $2.99 310

137-020 2020 CSAH 1 FIR AVE.- TH 297 PARK ST. Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $2.34 9,000

137-030 2020 CSAH 1 FIR AVE.- PARK CLEVELAND Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $8.98 9,000

137-040 2020 CSAH 1 CLEVELAND FRIBERG AVE. Platinum 0.7 Seal Coat $23.03 6,200

601-190 2020 CSAH 1 0.8 MI E JCT CSAH 14 N LIM OTTERTAIL CITY Platinum 4.6 Resurfacing $1,347.29 1,450

2020

Page 2 of 18




601-200 2020 CSAH 1 N LIM OTTERTAIL CITY TH 78 Platinum 0.8 Resurfacing $405.42 1,850

605-010 2020 CSAH 5 JCT CSAH 38 180th ST Silver 6.8 Seal Coat $129.56 270

605-015 2020 CSAH 5 180th ST NEW TH 210 Platinum 3.2 Seal Coat $60.52 680

605-020 2020 CSAH 5 JCT NEW TH 210 N OLD TH 210 Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $14.45 270

605-030 2020 CSAH 5 OAK ST FROM OLD TH 210 CEDAR ST Platinum 0.3 Resurfacing $72.55 740

605-040 2020 CSAH 5 ON MAIN - CEDAR CENTRAL AVE Platinum 0.2 Resurfacing $69.65 740

605-050 2020 CSAH 5 CENTRAL AVE N LIM CLITHERALL Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $15.96 740

605-060 2020 CSAH 5 NO LIM OF CLITHERALL 1.7 MI NO Gold 1.7 Resurfacing $452.21 740

605-061 2020 CSAH 5 1.7 MI NO 2.7 MI NO OF NO LIM CLITHERALL Gold 1.0 Resurfacing $266.01 710

605-062 2020 CSAH 5 2.7 MI NO OF NO LIM CLITHERALL CSAH 16 Gold 2.0 Resurfacing $532.01 430

606-020 2020 CSAH 6 CSAH 65 TH 29 Gold 4.1 Seal Coat $71.44 580

608-030 2020 CSAH 8 Bridge 56501 Platinum 0.0 Bridge $709.82 2,250

609-030 2020 CSAH 9 TH 34 3.0 MI NO Platinum 3.0 Seal Coat $57.02 810

609-040 2020 CSAH 9 3.0 MI NO OF TH 34 400' NO OF CSAH 20 Platinum 1.7 Seal Coat $32.31 1,150

609-050 2020 CSAH 9 400' NO CSAH 20 NO CO LINE Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $9.50 1,350

610-070 2020 CSAH 10 E LIMS ELIZABETH O.2 MI W CSAH 3 Platinum 6.2 Seal Coat $108.03 920

610-071 2020 CSAH 10 0.2 MI W CSAH 3 CSAH 1 Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $5.70 920

611-040 2020 CSAH 11 CSAH 88 FAI 94 Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $8.62 1,650

611-041 2020 CSAH 11 FAI 94 NO CORP LIMITS OF ROTHSAY Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $2.85 360

613-005 2020 CSAH 13 CSAH 8 CSAH 60 Platinum 1.5 Resurfacing $439.68 860

Page 3 of 18




613-010 2020 CSAH 13 CSAH 60 NORTH COUNTY LINE Gold 3.6 Resurfacing $1,040.28 860

615-030 2020 CSAH 15 Bridge 7267 Silver 0.0 Bridge $1,070.90 600

616-051 2020 CSAH 16 CSAH 55 0.8 M EAST of CSAH 55 Platinum 0.8 Seal Coat $25.30 850

616-052 2020 CSAH 16 0.8 M EAST OF CSAH 55 TH 108 Platinum 3.3 Seal Coat $104.54 850

619-040 2020 CSAH 19 CSAH 76 CSAH 8 Silver 8.9 Seal Coat $169.17 325

624-090 2020 CSAH 24 CSAH 3 CSAH 41 Gold 7.4 Seal Coat $146.52 365

634-010 2020 CSAH 34 CSAH 35 3.2 MILES EAST Platinum 3.2 Reconstruction $3,378.86 730

634-020 2020 CSAH 34 3.2 MI E OF CSAH 35 2.3 MI W OF W LIM PERHAM Platinum 1.3 Reconstruction $1,372.66 1,150

634-021 2020 CSAH 34 2.3 MI W 0.3 MI W OF W LIM PERHAM Platinum 2.0 Reconstruction $2,111.79 1,550

635-110 2020 CSAH 35 CSAH 1 0.1 MI N OF CO RD 115 Platinum 6.6 Resurfacing $1,915.25 1,050

635-120 2020 CSAH 35 0.1 MI N CO RD 115 CSAH 41 Platinum 1.0 Resurfacing $338.55 900

638-051 2020 CSAH 38 CSAH 59 TH 29 Gold 10.0 Seal Coat $349.42 370

651-042 2020 CSAH 51 W JCT E JCT CSAH 60 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $19.80 610

651-050 2020 CSAH 51 CSAH 60 1.4 MI NORTH Gold 1.4 Seal Coat $26.61 345

651-060 2020 CSAH 51 1.4 MI N OF CSAH 60 N CO LINE Gold 2.0 Seal Coat $38.02 210

654-010 2020 CSAH 54 TH 78 CH 127 Gold 2.0 Resurfacing $580.40 690

665-020 2020 CSAH 65 CSAH 40 3.1 MI NORTH Platinum 3.1 Seal Coat $58.92 455

665-030 2020 CSAH 65 3.1 M N CSAH 40 S LIM HENNING Platinum 2.2 Seal Coat $45.30 455

665-040 2020 CSAH 65 S LIM HENNING CSAH 67 Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $11.12 600

667-040 2020 CSAH 67 CSAH 50 CSAH 52 Gold 2.5 Resurfacing $725.47 290

Page 4 of 18




667-050 2020 CSAH 67 CSAH 52 CSAH 54 Gold 3.0 Resurfacing $870.57 600

670-010 2020 CSAH 70 CSAH 75 E CO LINE Silver 1.0 Seal Coat $19.80 200

672-010 2020 CSAH 72 TH 78 1.0 MI NW Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $17.42 1,250

672-020 2020 CSAH 72 1.0 MI 1.5 MI NW TH 78 Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $9.50 1,250

672-030 2020 CSAH 72 1.5 MI NW OF TH 78 2.5 MI NW OF TH 78 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $17.42 650

672-040 2020 CSAH 72 2.5 MI NW TH 78 CSAH 83 Gold 0.8 Seal Coat $13.94 650

688-050 2020 CSAH 88 CSAH 24 0.20 MI N Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.75 485

694-010 2020 CSAH 94 ON MAIN ST FROM FRONT ST PARK ST Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $3.22 920

695-010 2020 CSAH 95 VARIOUS STREETS IN PARKERS PRAIRIE Platinum 0.1 Reconstruction $349.27 640

696-010 2020 CSAH 96 1ST ST IN PELICAN RPDS Platinum 0.1 Reconstruction $307.36 1,500

696-020 2020 CSAH 96 MILL AVE IN PELICAN RPDS Platinum 0.1 Reconstruction $187.61 1,150

700-010 2020 CH 100 BROADWAY GRANT Platinum 0.1 Reconstruction $140.71 740

700-020 2020 CH 100 GRANT OTTERTAIL TO BROADWAY Platinum 0.2 Reconstruction $515.92 660

116-011 2020 CH 116 170TH AVE TH 210 Platinum 1.4 Seal Coat $26.61 1,150

127-010 2020 CH 127 JCT TH 108 JCT CSAH 54 Silver 2.5 Resurfacing $725.47 330

129-010 2020 CH 129 JCT CSAH 38 JCT CSAH 6 Bronze 1.7 Seal Coat $32.12 170

603-010 2021 CSAH 3 CSAH 10 1.15 MILES NORTH Platinum 1.2 Seal Coat $23.32 710

603-011 2021 CSAH 3 1.15 1.55 MI N OF CSAH 10 Platinum 1.3 Seal Coat $25.34 710

603-012 2021 CSAH 3 1.55 MI N CSAH 10 0.25 MI N CSAH 22 Platinum 2.7 Seal Coat $50.18 380

603-020 2021 CSAH 3 0.25 MI N CSAH 22 1.5 M N CSAH 22 Platinum 6.5 Seal Coat $120.81 520

2021

Page 5 of 18




603-030 2021 CSAH 3 1.5 M N CSAH 22 CSAH 24 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $20.28 520

604-010 2021 CSAH 4 TH 59 CSAH 31 Platinum 4.2 Seal Coat $84.22 1,300

604-020 2021 CSAH 4 W LIM OF VERGAS 0.08 MI E Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $1.62 1,300

604-021 2021 CSAH 4 0.08 MI E OF W CORP LIM PILICAN AVE Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $9.53 2,600

604-030 2021 CSAH 4 PILICAN AVE SECOND AVE Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $12.27 2,700

604-040 2021 CSAH 4 SECOND AVE MAIN ST VERGAS Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $4.83 2,350

604-050 2021 CSAH 4 CSAH 60 E LIM VERGAS Platinum 0.0 Seal Coat $0.81 1,200

604-051 2021 CSAH 4 E LIM VERGAS 2.0 MI NORTH Platinum 2.0 Seal Coat $40.55 1,100

604-060 2021 CSAH 4 2.0 MI N 2.6 MI N OF E LIM VERGAS Platinum 0.6 Seal Coat $12.17 1,100

604-070 2021 CSAH 4 2.6 MI N OF E LIM VERGAS N CO LINE Platinum 2.3 Seal Coat $46.63 1,100

608-010 2021 CSAH 8 NW JCT CSAH 80 (MAIN ST) 2ND ST Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $67.86 5,300

608-020 2021 CSAH 8 2ND ST KING ST Platinum 0.5 Resurfacing $271.43 4,900

608-029 2021 CSAH 8 KING ST NO LIM PERHAM Platinum 1.0 Resurfacing $301.59 3,650

608-030 2021 CSAH 8 NO CORP LIM PERHAM 1.9 MI NE OF PERHAM Platinum 1.9 Resurfacing $573.03 2,250

608-031 2021 CSAH 8 1.9 M N OF N LIM PERHAM 2.0 M N OF N LIM PERHAM Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $60.32 1,800

608-032 2021 CSAH 8 2.0 M N OF N LIM PERHAM CSAH 13 Platinum 1.0 Resurfacing $452.39 1,800

608-040 2021 CSAH 8 CSAH 13 0.4 MI E Platinum 0.4 Resurfacing $120.64 1,250

608-041 2021 CSAH 8 0.4 MI E OF CSAH 13 CSAH 53 Platinum 2.6 Resurfacing $849.49 1,250

619-010 2021 CSAH 19 TH 10 ON PROSPECT ST 0.06 MI N OF 4TH ST Gold 0.2 Seal Coat $8.55 630

619-020 2021 CSAH 19 PROSPECT ST 0.32 MI NO Gold 0.3 Seal Coat $7.57 630

Page 6 of 18




624-010 2021 CSAH 24 CSAH 88 E LIM ROTHSAY Gold 0.3 Seal Coat $6.69 380

624-020 2021 CSAH 24 E CORP LIM ROTHSAY 2.3 MI EAST Gold 2.3 Seal Coat $46.63 380

624-021 2021 CSAH 24 2.3 MI 2.9 MI E OF ROTHSAY Gold 0.6 Seal Coat $12.17 380

624-022 2021 CSAH 24 2.9 MI E OF ROTHSAY 3.4 MI EAST Gold 0.5 Seal Coat $10.14 370

624-030 2021 CSAH 24 3.4 MI E OF ROTHSAY 3.8 MI EAST Gold 0.4 Seal Coat $8.79 370

624-040 2021 CSAH 24 3.8 MI E OF ROTHSAY WEST LIMITS ERHARD Gold 5.2 Seal Coat $114.22 370

624-050 2021 CSAH 24 W LIM ERHARD 0.1 MI E Gold 0.1 Seal Coat $2.20 530

624-051 2021 CSAH 24 537.8' E OF W CORP LIM LAKESIDE DRIVE Gold 0.1 Seal Coat $2.42 530

624-060 2021 CSAH 24 LAKESIDE AVE TH 59 Gold 0.1 Seal Coat $3.35 530

635-080 2021 CSAH 35 SO LIM UNDERWOOD CLEVELAND AVE Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.87 2,700

635-090 2021 CSAH 35 CLEVELAND N LIMS UNDERWOOD Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $19.01 1,900

635-100 2021 CSAH 35 N LIMS UNDERWOOD CSAH 18 Platinum 3.0 Reconstruction $3,425.56 1,300

635-110 2021 CSAH 35 Bridge 56505 Platinum 0.0 Bridge $1,215.40 1,050

644-010 2021 CSAH 44 CSAH 35 2.0 MI SOUTH Gold 2.0 Seal Coat $40.55 385

644-020 2021 CSAH 44 2.0 MI S CSAH 35 CSAH 14 Gold 3.4 Seal Coat $68.94 385

646-010 2021 CSAH 46 SOO LINE RR ON MAIN - TH 29 Platinum 0.2 Reconstruction $479.58 1,100

653-010 2021 CSAH 53 TH 10 3.7 MI N Gold 3.7 Seal Coat $75.02 510

653-020 2021 CSAH 53 3.7 MI N TH 10 CSAH 8 Gold 4.3 Seal Coat $87.18 300

667-060 2021 CSAH 67 CSAH 54 0.1 MI S OF S LIM NEW YORK MILLS Gold 3.6 Seal Coat $72.99 1,300

667-120 2021 CSAH 67 CSAH 58 S CSAH 67 Platinum 5.4 Resurfacing $1,764.32 870

Page 7 of 18




667-130 2021 CSAH 67 S JCT CSAH 67 CSAH 8 Platinum 1.0 Resurfacing $326.73 580

674-010 2021 CSAH 74 CSAH 35 1.9 MI E Platinum 1.9 Seal Coat $41.73 495

674-020 2021 CSAH 74 1.9 MI E 2.1 MI E CSAH 35 Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.39 495

674-030 2021 CSAH 74 2.1 MI E 2.5 MI E CSAH 35 Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $8.79 495

674-040 2021 CSAH 74 2.5 MI E CSAH 35 0.1 MI E CSAH 45 Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $2.20 495

675-071 2021 CSAH 75 Bridge L0923 Platinum 0.0 Bridge $275.00 670

677-040 2021 CSAH 77 TH 10 CENTER ST Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.46 520

677-050 2021 CSAH 77 CENTER ST PROSPECT ST Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $2.60 520

131-010 2021 CH 131 CSAH 35 CSAH 35 Bronze 2.3 Resurfacing $748.07 100

601-020 2022 CSAH 1 CSAH 2 INT 94 Platinum 4.1 Reconstruction $4,821.47 1,050

104-110 2022 CSAH 1 FIR AVE. - TOWER ROAD TH297 (WEST JCT.) Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $14.60 4,350

104-100 2022 CSAH 1 TH297 (WEST JCT.) UNION AVE. Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $4.06 6,400

612-030 2022 CSAH 12 CEDAR ST CSAH 35 Silver 0.1 Seal Coat $4.46 1,300

627-032 2022 CSAH 27 0.5 MI N OF LIM FERGUS FALLS CSAH 10 Platinum 4.0 Seal Coat $81.10 2,200

631-010 2022 CSAH 31 CSAH 4 1.2 MI N Platinum 1.2 Seal Coat $24.33 550

631-020 2022 CSAH 31 1.2 MI 2.5 MI N CSAH 4 Platinum 1.3 Seal Coat $26.36 620

631-030 2022 CSAH 31 2.5 MI N CSAH 4 TH 59 Platinum 2.7 Seal Coat $54.74 620

635-040 2022 CSAH 35 CSAH 82 ANDERSON ST Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $9.80 1,150

635-050 2022 CSAH 35 ANDERSON ST 0.16 MI N Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $5.41 1,000

635-060 2022 CSAH 35 0.16 MI N ANDERSON ST N LIM OF DALTON Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $1.67 840

2022

Page 8 of 18




635-130 2022 CSAH 35 CSAH 41 2.7 MI S OF CSAH 44 Platinum 5.5 Seal Coat $130.10 650

635-140 2022 CSAH 35 2.7 MILES SOUTH OF CSAH 44 CSAH 44 Platinum 2.7 Seal Coat $63.87 650

635-150 2022 CSAH 35 CSAH 44 S LIMITS DENT Platinum 1.1 Seal Coat $22.30 1,300

635-151 2022 CSAH 35 S LIM OF DENT 0.15 MI N Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $5.58 1,300

635-160 2022 CSAH 35 0.15 M N OF S LIM OF DENT 3RD AVE Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $8.18 1,300

635-170 2022 CSAH 35 3RD AVE 1ST AVE Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $6.08 1,300

635-180 2022 CSAH 35 ON 1ST AVE - MAIN ST TH 108 Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $11.35 1,150

635-190 2022 CSAH 35 TH 108 N LIM DENT 2.9 MI N Platinum 2.9 Resurfacing $949.34 470

635-200 2022 CSAH 35 2.9 MI 7.1 MI NW OF TH 108 Platinum 4.2 Resurfacing $1,319.92 750

635-210 2022 CSAH 35 7.1 MI NW OF TH 108 0.2 MI S OF S LIM OF VERGAS Platinum 3.5 Resurfacing $1,145.76 1,300

646-020 2022 CSAH 46 SOO LINE RR 0.16 MI E Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $2.97 800

646-030 2022 CSAH 46 0.16 MI E OF SOO LINE RR E LIM PARKERS PRAIRIE Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $1.67 800

646-040 2022 CSAH 46 E LIM PARKERS PRAIRIE 3.1 MI E Platinum 3.1 Seal Coat $57.62 800

646-050 2022 CSAH 46 3.1 MI 3.7 MI E OF E LIM PARKERS PRAIRIE Platinum 0.6 Seal Coat $12.67 590

646-060 2022 CSAH 46 3.7 MI E OF E LIM PARKERS PRAIRIE CSAH 69 Platinum 1.7 Seal Coat $31.60 300

646-070 2022 CSAH 46 CSAH 69 E CO LINE Gold 4.3 Seal Coat $79.92 300

655-010 2022 CSAH 55 CSAH 16 3.3 MI N Gold 3.3 Seal Coat $66.91 295

655-011 2022 CSAH 55 3.3 MI N 5.7 MI N OF CSAH 16 Gold 2.4 Seal Coat $50.69 295

655-012 2022 CSAH 55 5.7 MI N OF CSAH 16 SOUTH LIM OTTERTAIL Gold 1.0 Seal Coat $20.28 295

655-020 2022 CSAH 55 S LIMS OTTERTAIL TH 108 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $20.28 480

Page 9 of 18




658-010 2022 CSAH 58 CSAH 67 CSAH 19 Bronze 9.1 Resurfacing $2,978.98 225

667-008 2022 CSAH 67 CSAH 65 IN HENNING E CITY LIM JCT Platinum 1.3 Resurfacing $414.83 1,000

667-009 2022 CSAH 67 E LIM OF HENNING TH 210 Platinum 0.2 Resurfacing $62.85 530

667-040 2022 CSAH 67 Bridge 92516 Gold 0.0 Bridge $316.71 290

104-120 2022 CSAH 88 FIR AVE. - TOWER ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD. Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $17.33 4,350

104-130 2022 CSAH 88 FIR AVE. - INDUSTRIAL PARK BLVD. MARYLAND LANE Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $13.69 4,350

104-140 2022 CSAH 88 FIR AVE. - MARYLAND LANE NORTH CITY LIMITS Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $5.02 4,350

688-010 2022 CSAH 88 LIMS FERGUS FALLS W RAMP FAI 94 Platinum 3.1 Seal Coat $62.85 2,800

111-010 2022 CH 111 JCT 1 N LIMITS FERGUS FALLS Platinum 0.5 Resurfacing $163.42 2,500

111-011 2022 CH 111 NO LIM FERGUS FALLS 1.6 MI NO Platinum 1.6 Resurfacing $502.82 960

601-010 2023 CSAH 1 SOUTH COUNTY LINE CH 112 Platinum 4.0 Seal Coat $107.71 710

601-015 2023 CSAH 1 CH 112 CSAH 2 Platinum 3.0 Seal Coat $74.97 710

601-160 2023 CSAH 1 0.1 MI E OF CSAH 10 CSAH 35 Platinum 5.7 Seal Coat $122.79 2,400

601-190 2023 CSAH 1 0.8 MI E JCT CSAH 14 N LIM OTTERTAIL CITY Platinum 4.6 Seal Coat $100.02 1,450

601-200 2023 CSAH 1 N LIM OTTERTAIL CITY TH 78 Platinum 0.8 Seal Coat $30.10 1,850

613-005 2023 CSAH 13 CSAH 8 CSAH 60 Platinum 1.5 Seal Coat $32.64 860

613-010 2023 CSAH 13 CSAH 60 NORTH COUNTY LINE Gold 3.6 Seal Coat $77.23 860

614-040 2023 CSAH 14 TH 78 2.2 MI E Gold 2.2 Resurfacing $749.23 1,000

614-041 2023 CSAH 14 2.2 MI E 2.4 MI E OF TH 78 Gold 0.2 Resurfacing $119.88 1,000

614-042 2023 CSAH 14 2.4 MI E 2.9 MI E OF TH 78 Gold 0.5 Resurfacing $170.28 1,000

2023

Page 10 of 18




614-050 2023 CSAH 14 2.9 MI E OF TH 78 4.1 MI W OF CSAH 67 Gold 2.1 Resurfacing $686.57 470

614-051 2023 CSAH 14 4.1 MI W CSAH 67 Gold 4.1 Resurfacing $1,340.44 470

621-060 2023 CSAH 21 CSAH 30 N CO LINE Gold 1.5 Seal Coat $32.31 230

634-010 2023 CSAH 34 CSAH 35 3.2 MILES EAST Platinum 3.2 Seal Coat $63.19 730

634-020 2023 CSAH 34 3.2 MI E OF CSAH 35 2.3 MI W OF W LIM PERHAM Platinum 1.3 Seal Coat $25.67 1,150

634-021 2023 CSAH 34 2.3 MI W 0.3 MI W OF W LIM PERHAM Platinum 2.0 Seal Coat $39.49 1,550

635-030 2023 CSAH 35 FAI 94 SO LIM DALTON Platinum 2.1 Resurfacing $629.35 970

635-105 2023 CSAH 35 CSAH 18 CSAH 1 Platinum 3.0 Reconstruction $3,854.19 860

635-110 2023 CSAH 35 CSAH 1 0.1 MI N OF CO RD 115 Platinum 6.6 Seal Coat $142.18 1,050

635-120 2023 CSAH 35 0.1 MI N CO RD 115 CSAH 41 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $25.13 900

636-010 2023 CSAH 36 CSAH 35 SOUTH LIMITS VERGAS Gold 0.4 Seal Coat $8.69 295

636-020 2023 CSAH 36 SO LIM VERGAS 1.0 MI SE Gold 1.0 Seal Coat $19.75 295

636-030 2023 CSAH 36 1.0 MI SE OF VERGAS CSAH 60 Gold 5.3 Seal Coat $114.17 295

645-020 2023 CSAH 45 Bridge 7266 Silver 0.0 Bridge $750.20 275

650-050 2023 CSAH 50 TH 106 TH 29 Gold 0.3 Seal Coat $11.85 910

650-060 2023 CSAH 50 TH 29 E LIM DEER CREEK Gold 0.7 Seal Coat $14.22 340

650-070 2023 CSAH 50 E LIM CSAH 73 Gold 2.4 Seal Coat $47.39 340

651-020 2023 CSAH 51 CSAH 80 0.06 MI EAST Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $32.69 2,000

651-021 2023 CSAH 51 0.06 MI E CSAH 80 0.11 MI S NEW W LIM PERHAM Platinum 0.5 Resurfacing $277.90 2,300

651-022 2023 CSAH 51 0.11 MI S OF NEW W CORP LIM PERHAM NEW W CORP LIM PERHAM Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $32.97 2,300

Page 11 of 18




651-030 2023 CSAH 51 NEW W CORP LIM PERHAM N LIM PERHAM Platinum 1.2 Resurfacing $350.64 2,300

651-031 2023 CSAH 51 N LIM PERHAM 1.0 MI N Platinum 1.0 Resurfacing $299.69 2,300

651-032 2023 CSAH 51 1.0 MI N 1.8 MI N OF LIM PERHAM Platinum 0.8 Resurfacing $272.45 2,300

651-040 2023 CSAH 51 1.8 MI N 2.9 MI N OF N LIM PERHAM Platinum 1.1 Resurfacing $329.66 610

651-041 2023 CSAH 51 2.9 MI N OF N LIM PERHAM W JCT CSAH 60 Platinum 0.3 Resurfacing $89.91 610

660-010 2023 CSAH 60 TH 10 CSAH 51 Platinum 3.4 Resurfacing $1,111.59 570


660-040 2023 CSAH 60 1.7 MI E 1.9 MI E CSAH 51 Platinum 0.2 Resurfacing $65.39 380

660-050 2023 CSAH 60 1.9 MI E CSAH 51 CSAH 13 Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $32.69 380

673-020 2023 CSAH 73 TH 210 TH 29 Gold 6.6 Seal Coat $142.18 230

683-010 2023 CSAH 83 LAKE AVE OLAF ST BATTLE LAKE Gold 0.3 Seal Coat $11.85 730

683-020 2023 CSAH 83 OLAF ST W LIM BATTLE LAKE Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $8.83 730

683-030 2023 CSAH 83 W LIM BATTLE LAKE CO RD 122 Platinum 2.1 Seal Coat $45.24 550

683-040 2023 CSAH 83 JCT CO RD 122 3.6 MI S OF CSAH1 Platinum 2.8 Seal Coat $60.32 275

683-050 2023 CSAH 83 3.6 MI S CSAH 1 1.5 MI S CSAH 1 Gold 2.1 Seal Coat $45.24 275

683-051 2023 CSAH 83 1.5 MI S OF CSAH 1 CSAH 72 Gold 1.5 Seal Coat $32.31 275


127-010 2023 CH 127 JCT TH 108 JCT CSAH 54 Silver 2.5 Seal Coat $53.86 330

135-020 2023 CH 135 JCT CH 142 JCT CSAH 84 Gold 3.0 Seal Coat $64.41 410

Page 12 of 18




601-140 2024 CSAH 1 FIR AVE LENORE WAY Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $13.34 9,000

601-141 2024 CSAH 1 LENORE WAY LAKEVIEW DR Platinum 0.9 Seal Coat $30.10 6,700

601-150 2024 CSAH 1 LAKEVIEW DR LAKEWOOD DR Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $5.07 5,400

601-150 2024 CSAH 1 LAKEVIEW DR LAKEVIEW DR E Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $5.07 5,400

601-151 2024 CSAH 1 LAKEWOOD DR 0.40 MI E Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $13.69 3,750

601-152 2024 CSAH 1 0.4 MI E OF LAKEWOOD DR 0.10 MI NO CSAH 18 Platinum 2.2 Seal Coat $50.88 3,750

601-153 2024 CSAH 1 0.1 MI N CSAH 18 0.1 MI E CSAH 10 Platinum 3.3 Seal Coat $75.41 2,500

601-161 2024 CSAH 1 CSAH 35 CSAH 45 Platinum 2.6 Seal Coat $98.84 1,500

601-165 2024 CSAH 1 CSAH 45 0.3 MI W OF CSAH 83 Platinum 2.1 Seal Coat $47.79 1,500

601-170 2024 CSAH 1 0.3 MI W OF CSAH 83 1.9 MI S OF CSAH 74 Platinum 1.6 Seal Coat $35.49 1,030

603-040 2024 CSAH 3 CSAH 24 6.5 MILES NORTH Platinum 6.5 Seal Coat $148.26 820

603-050 2024 CSAH 3 6.5 M N CSAH 24 TH 59 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $21.10 820

608-010 2024 CSAH 8 NW JCT CSAH 80 (MAIN ST) 2ND ST Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $5.13 5,300

608-020 2024 CSAH 8 2ND ST KING ST Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $20.53 4,900

608-029 2024 CSAH 8 KING ST NO LIM PERHAM Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $22.81 3,650

608-030 2024 CSAH 8 NO CORP LIM PERHAM 1.9 MI NE OF PERHAM Platinum 1.9 Seal Coat $43.34 2,250

608-031 2024 CSAH 8 1.9 M N OF N LIM PERHAM 2.0 M N OF N LIM PERHAM Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $4.56 1,800

608-032 2024 CSAH 8 2.0 M N OF N LIM PERHAM CSAH 13 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $34.21 1,800

608-040 2024 CSAH 8 CSAH 13 0.4 MI E Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $9.12 1,250

608-041 2024 CSAH 8 0.4 MI E OF CSAH 13 CSAH 53 Platinum 2.6 Seal Coat $64.25 1,250

2024

Page 13 of 18




610-050 2024 CSAH 10 TH 59 0.13 MI E Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $5.93 1,200

610-060 2024 CSAH 10 0.13 MI E OF TH 59 E LIM ELIZABETH Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $9.81 1,200

614-010 2024 CSAH 14 CSAH 1 N 0.1 MI Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $35.38 470

614-011 2024 CSAH 14 .1 MI 2.7 MI N OF CSAH 1 Platinum 2.6 Resurfacing $882.98 470

614-012 2024 CSAH 14 2.7 MI N 2.8 MI N OF CSAH 1 Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $33.96 600

614-013 2024 CSAH 14 2.8 MI N OF CSAH 1 W LIM RICHVILLE Platinum 5.2 Resurfacing $1,765.97 850

614-020 2024 CSAH 14 W LIM RICHVILLE E 0.25 MILES Platinum 0.3 Resurfacing $155.65 1,100

614-021 2024 CSAH 14 0.25 MI E OF W LIM 0.66 MI E OF W LIM RICHVILLE Platinum 0.4 Resurfacing $261.07 1,100

614-022 2024 CSAH 14 0.66 MI E OF W LIM E LIM RICHVILLE Platinum 0.4 Resurfacing $129.05 980

614-030 2024 CSAH 14 E LIM RICHVILLE TH 78 Platinum 2.0 Resurfacing $679.22 1,050

615-041 2024 CSAH 15 0.1 MI E OF OTTER TAIL RIVER 0.4 MI W OF CSAH 1 Platinum 0.9 Seal Coat $20.53 1,300

615-050 2024 CSAH 15 0.4 M W CSAH 1 Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $9.12 1,300

619-021 2024 CSAH 19 0.32 MI NO OF PROSPECT ST NO CORP LIM Gold 0.8 Seal Coat $22.09 630

619-030 2024 CSAH 19 N LIM BLUFFTON CSAH 76 Gold 1.0 Seal Coat $26.61 630


620-020 2024 CSAH 20 1.5 M E CSAH 9 SENNS PT ROAD Platinum 0.5 Resurfacing $191.03 950

620-021 2024 CSAH 20 0.9 MI 0.7 MI WEST CSAH 31 Platinum 0.2 Resurfacing $76.41 760

620-030 2024 CSAH 20 0.7 MI W OF CSAH 31 CSAH 31 Platinum 0.7 Resurfacing $237.73 1,100

620-040 2024 CSAH 20 CSAH 31 2.0 MILES EAST Platinum 2.0 Resurfacing $622.62 1,100

620-050 2024 CSAH 20 2.0 M E OF CSAH 31 TH 59 Platinum 0.2 Resurfacing $67.92 1,100

Page 14 of 18




621-010 2024 CSAH 21 TH 210 CSAH 88 Gold 6.2 Seal Coat $141.42 235


650-020 2024 CSAH 50 CSAH 67 W LIMS DEER CREEK Gold 3.0 Reconstruction $3,854.19 600

650-030 2024 CSAH 50 W LIM DEER CREEK 0.50 MI E Gold 0.5 Reconstruction $642.36 600

667-060 2024 CSAH 67 CSAH 54 0.1 MI S OF S LIM NEW YORK MILLS Gold 3.6 Seal Coat $82.11 1,300

667-120 2024 CSAH 67 CSAH 58 S CSAH 67 Platinum 5.4 Seal Coat $133.44 870

667-130 2024 CSAH 67 S JCT CSAH 67 CSAH 8 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $24.71 580

677-030 2024 CSAH 77 0.81 MI N OF S CORP LIM TH 10 Silver 0.3 Seal Coat $6.16 315

680-010 2024 CSAH 80 NW JCT TH 10 N CITY LIM PERHAM Platinum 2.2 Resurfacing $747.14 3,000

680-020 2024 CSAH 80 N CITY LIM PERHAM CSAH 8 Platinum 0.8 Resurfacing $566.58 5,500

680-022 2024 CSAH 80 CSAH 8 E CITY LIM Platinum 0.4 Resurfacing $309.04 6,300

680-030 2024 CSAH 80 E CITY LIM OF PERHAM SE JCT TH 10 Platinum 1.6 Resurfacing $543.38 6,300

682-010 2024 CSAH 82 S CO LINE S LIM DALTON Platinum 6.1 Seal Coat $162.33 790

682-020 2024 CSAH 82 S LIM W LIM DALTON Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $7.98 790

682-021 2024 CSAH 82 W LIM DALTON 1.0 MI W Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $26.61 1,300

682-030 2024 CSAH 82 1.0 MI W OF W LIM DALTON TH 59 Platinum 4.5 Seal Coat $111.20 1,300

688-030 2024 CSAH 88 CSAH 10 S LIM OF ROTHSAY Platinum 7.0 Seal Coat $159.67 485

688-040 2024 CSAH 88 S LIM ROTHSAY CSAH 24 Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $2.05 485

699-010 2024 CSAH 99 ON MAIN 2ND AVE CSAH 14 RICHVILLE Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $71.32 345

114-030 2024 CH 114 1.5 M S OF N JCT CSAH 15 N JCT CSAH 15 Silver 1.5 Seal Coat $34.21 260

Page 15 of 18




120-010 2024 CH 120 JCT CSAH 29 0.6 M EAST Platinum 0.6 Seal Coat $13.69 560

120-020 2024 CH 120 0.6 MI EAST JCT CSAH 29 CSAH 33 Platinum 1.1 Seal Coat $25.09 560

132-010 2024 CH 132 JCT CSAH 61 TH 108 Silver 2.0 Seal Coat $45.85 140

145-010 2024 CH 145 CSAH 72 CSAH 1 Platinum 1.0 Seal Coat $22.81 630

601-030 2025 CSAH 1 I 94 0.2 MI N Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $5.16 2,500

608-007 2025 CSAH 8 JCT TH 10 S CITY LIMS PERHAM Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.56 8,000

608-008 2025 CSAH 8 S CITY LIMS OF PERHAM 4TH ST Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $15.97 8,000

608-009 2025 CSAH 8 4TH ST S E JCT CSAH 80 IN PERHAM Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $10.45 8,300

610-030 2025 CSAH 10 W LIM ELIZABETH BAURAU ST Gold 0.5 Reconstruction $728.64 680

610-040 2025 CSAH 10 BAURAU ST TH 59 ELIZABETH Gold 0.2 Reconstruction $992.16 770

619-040 2025 CSAH 19 Bridge 92517 Silver 0.0 Bridge $500.00 260

624-061 2025 CSAH 24 TH 59 EAST 0.15 MI Platinum 0.2 Resurfacing $97.23 770

624-070 2025 CSAH 24 0.15 MI E OF TH 59 E LIM ERHARD Platinum 0.3 Resurfacing $109.60 770

624-080 2025 CSAH 24 E LIM ERHARD CSAH 3 Platinum 4.8 Resurfacing $1,697.03 490

627-010 2025 CSAH 27 FIR AVE FERGUS FALLS 0.19 MI N Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $7.95 3,200

627-020 2025 CSAH 27 0.19 MI NO OF FIR AVE NO CORP LIM FERGUS FALLS Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $7.07 3,200

627-030 2025 CSAH 27 N LIM OF FERGUS FALLS 0.2 MI N Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.56 3,200

627-031 2025 CSAH 27 0.2 MI N 0.5 MI N OF N LIM FERGUS FALLS Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $6.84 3,200

631-010 2025 CSAH 31 CSAH 4 1.2 MI N Platinum 1.2 Resurfacing $424.26 550

631-020 2025 CSAH 31 1.2 MI 2.5 MI N CSAH 4 Platinum 1.3 Resurfacing $459.61 620

2025

Page 16 of 18




631-030 2025 CSAH 31 2.5 MI N CSAH 4 TH 59 Platinum 2.7 Resurfacing $954.58 620

634-022 2025 CSAH 34 0.3 MI W W CORP LIM PERHAM Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $6.27 2,100

634-023 2025 CSAH 34 W CORP LIM PERHAM 2ND ST SW Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $5.02 2,100

634-030 2025 CSAH 34 2ND ST SW CSAH 80 Platinum 0.1 Seal Coat $2.72 2,100

635-070 2025 CSAH 35 N LIM OF DALTON S LIM UNDERWOOD Platinum 8.4 Seal Coat $175.63 930

635-100 2025 CSAH 35 N LIMS UNDERWOOD CSAH 18 Platinum 3.0 Seal Coat $62.73 1,300

635-190 2025 CSAH 35 TH 108 N LIM DENT 2.9 MI N Platinum 2.9 Seal Coat $68.90 470

635-200 2025 CSAH 35 2.9 MI 7.1 MI NW OF TH 108 Platinum 4.2 Seal Coat $95.80 750

635-210 2025 CSAH 35 7.1 MI NW OF TH 108 0.2 MI S OF S LIM OF VERGAS Platinum 3.5 Seal Coat $83.16 1,300

646-010 2025 CSAH 46 SOO LINE RR ON MAIN - TH 29 Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $8.78 1,100

652-010 2025 CSAH 52 TH 108 CSAH 67 Platinum 3.2 Resurfacing $1,131.36 940

652-020 2025 CSAH 52 JCT CSAH 67 0.10 MI EAST Platinum 0.1 Resurfacing $35.35 940

652-021 2025 CSAH 52 0.1 MI E OF CSAH 67 CH 135 Platinum 1.8 Resurfacing $583.36 940

652-022 2025 CSAH 52 CH 135 TH 106 Platinum 2.1 Resurfacing $680.58 940

652-030 2025 CSAH 52 TH 106 TH 29 Platinum 4.0 Resurfacing $1,414.20 650

658-010 2025 CSAH 58 CSAH 67 CSAH 19 Bronze 9.1 Seal Coat $216.22 225

661-020 2025 CSAH 61 5.9 MI N OF CSAH 16 0.1 MI S OF TH 108 Silver 1.5 Reconstruction $2,003.76 360

661-030 2025 CSAH 61 0.1 MI S TH 108 Silver 0.1 Reconstruction $133.58 360

667-008 2025 CSAH 67 CSAH 65 IN HENNING E CITY LIM JCT Platinum 1.3 Seal Coat $30.11 1,000

667-009 2025 CSAH 67 E LIM OF HENNING TH 210 Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.56 530

667-071 2025 CSAH 67 S LIM NEW YORK MILLS 0.23 MI N Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $9.62 1,700

Page 17 of 18




667-080 2025 CSAH 67 0.23 MI N OF S LIM NEW YORK MILLS CSAH 84 Platinum 0.4 Seal Coat $15.05 2,350

667-090 2025 CSAH 67 BROADWAY - OLD TH 10 GILMAN ST Platinum 0.3 Seal Coat $12.24 3,300

667-100 2025 CSAH 67 GILLMAN ST N LIM NEW YORK MILLS Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $24.63 3,550

667-110 2025 CSAH 67 N LIM NEW YORK MILLS CSAH 58 Platinum 2.2 Seal Coat $54.36 1,300

675-050 2025 CSAH 75 CSAH 50 TH 29 Platinum 3.3 Seal Coat $75.27 830

675-060 2025 CSAH 75 TH 29 TH 10 Platinum 1.1 Seal Coat $25.09 1,150

675-070 2025 CSAH 75 TH 10 0.8 MI NORTH Platinum 0.8 Seal Coat $18.25 670

675-071 2025 CSAH 75 0.8 MI N 1.0 MI N OF TH 10 Platinum 0.2 Seal Coat $4.56 670

675-072 2025 CSAH 75 1.0 MI N OF TH 10 CSAH 76 Platinum 1.9 Seal Coat $43.34 670

111-010 2025 CH 111 JCT 1 N LIMITS FERGUS FALLS Platinum 0.5 Seal Coat $11.86 2,500

111-011 2025 CH 111 NO LIM FERGUS FALLS 1.6 MI NO Platinum 1.6 Seal Coat $36.50 960

Page 18 of 18

2040 transportation plan - otter tail county, mn...2019/10/22 · transportation plan because it...

Documents