21b - 1 horngren ♦ harrison ♦ bamber ♦ best ♦ fraser ♦ willett, accounting 4e copyright ©...

28
21b - 1 Horngren Harrison Bamber Best Fraser Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia Appendix 21B: Activity-based Costing Objectives Describe and develop activity-based costs (ABC) Decide when ABC is most likely to pass the cost- benefit test

Upload: vincent-hudson

Post on 31-Dec-2015

236 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

21b - 1Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Appendix 21B: Activity-based Costing

Objectives Describe and develop activity-based

costs (ABC) Decide when ABC is most likely to pass

the cost-benefit test

21b - 2Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

David, Matt, and Marc:Total expenses = $900

Cost allocated = $300 per person

Rent and Electricity $570Cable TV 50High speed Internet access 40Groceries 240Total $900

Refining Cost Systems

21b - 3Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Refining Cost Systems

More Refined Allocation

David Matt Marc TotalRent and Electricity $190 $190 $190 $570Cable TV 25 – 25 50Internet access – 40 – 40Groceries – 80 160 240Total costs allocated $215 $310 $375 $900Original cost allocation 300 300 300 900Difference $(85) $ 10 $ 75 $ 0

21b - 4Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Sharpening the Focus: From Business Functions to Activities

PANEL A—Companywide Business Functions in the Value ChainR&DDesignProductionMarketingDistributionCustomer Service

PANEL B—Production Departments/Product LinesServersNotebook ComputersDesktop Computers

Inventoriable costs for financial reporting

Inventoriable costs for financial reporting

21b - 5Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Sharpening the Focus: From Business Functions to Activities

PANEL C—Activities for Desktop Product Line1. Kitting—preparing all items for assembly2. Motherboard preparation—snapping in

CPU and memory modules3. Assembly into chassis4. Software downloading5. Testing6. Boxing

Inventoriablecosts forfinancialreporting

21b - 6Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Describe and developactivity-based costs

(ABC).

Objective 1

21b - 7Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Example of Activities and Cost Drivers:

Activities:Material purchasingMaterial handlingProduction schedulingQuality inspectionsPhotocopyingWarranty service

Cost Drivers:No. of purchase ordersNo. of partsNo. of batchesNo. of inspectionsNo. of pages copiedNo. of service calls

Activity-Based Costing

21b - 8Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Traditional versus Activity-Based

Costing Systems Chemtech produces large quantities of

“commodity” chemicals. It also manufactures small quantities of

specialty chemicals. In the past, Chemtech’s manufacturing

department has used direct labour hours as its single allocation base at a 200% rate.

21b - 9Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Traditional versus Activity-Based

Costing Systems Among its many products, the

department produces Aldehyde (a commodity chemical used by producing plastics) and...

Phenylephrine Hydrochloride (PH), which is a specialty chemical.

A single customer uses PH in manufacturing blood-pressure medications.

21b - 10Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Traditional versus Activity-Based

Costing SystemsChemical Manufacturing Department Overhead

DirectLabour

Cost

ChemicalA

ChemicalB

ChemicalC

DepartmentalIndirect CostPool

CostAllocationBase

ProductCostObjects

21b - 11Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Traditional versus Activity-Based

Costing SystemsChemical Manufacturing Department Overhead

No. ofMachine

Hours

ChemicalA

ChemicalB

ChemicalC

DepartmentalIndirect CostPool

CostAllocationBase

ProductCostObjects

No. ofSamplesTaken

No. ofBatches

ProcessingMixing TestingActivityIndirect CostPool

21b - 12Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Chemtech Traditional Cost System Aldehyde PH

Sale price per Kg $10 $70Less: manufacturingcost per KgDirect materials 5 20Direct labour 1 10Manufacturing overhead 2 20Gross profit per Kg $ 2 $20

Traditional versus Activity-Based

Costing Systems

21b - 13Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Traditional versus Activity-Based

Costing Systems Assume that the company produced

7,000 Kg of Aldehyde and 5 Kg of PH. What is the total labour cost per

product? 7,000 Kg × $1 = $7,000 (Aldehyde) 5 Kg × $10 = $50 (PH) What is the total manufacturing

overhead allocated to each product?

21b - 14Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Chemtech assigns 140 times as much overhead to Aldehyde as to PH.

Chemtech assigns 140 times as much overhead to Aldehyde as to PH.

Traditional versus Activity-Based

Costing Systems $7,000 × 200% = $14,000 to Aldehyde $50 × 200% = $100 to PH

21b - 15Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Activity-Based Costing System

Identify activities.

MixingProcessing

Testing

Estimate the total indirectcosts of each activity.

Labour $150,000Depreciation 200,000Other 250,000Total $600,000

Step 1 Step 2

21b - 16Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Activity-Based Costing System

Identify the primary cost driver foreach activity’s indirect costs.

(1) (2) (3)Activity Estimated Costs Cost DriverMixing $600,000 # of batchesProcessing $300,000 # of hours (MH)Testing $600,000 # samples

Step 3

21b - 17Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Activity-Based Costing System

Estimate the total quantity of each allocation base.

(1) (4)Activity Estimated Quantity of Cost DriverMixing 4,000 batchesProcessing 5,000 machine hours (MH)Testing 3,000 samples

Step 4

21b - 18Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Activity-Based Costing System

Calculate the allocation rate for each activity.

(1) (5)Activity Cost Allocation RateMixing $600,000 ÷ 4,000 = $150/batchProcessing $300,000 ÷ 5,000 = $60/MHTesting $600,000 ÷ 3,000 = $200/sample

Step 5

21b - 19Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Activity-Based Costing System

Obtain the actual quantity of each allocation base used by each product.

During the year, Chemtech produced60 batches of Aldehyde and 1 batch of PH.

The remaining batches consistof Chemtech’s other chemicals.

Step 6

21b - 20Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Activity-Based Costing System

Allocate the costs to each product.

Mixing Cost Allocation:Aldehyde: 60 batches × $150 per batch = $9,000

PH: 1 batch × $150 per batch = $150

Step 7

21b - 21Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Activity-Based Costing System

The ABC system allocates 29 times asmuch overhead to Aldehyde as to PH.

Activity Cost Driver Units Cost Allocated to:Used By:

Aldehyde PH Aldehyde PH Mixing 60 batches 1 batch $ 9,000 $150Processing 30.5 MH 2 MH 1,830* 120Testing 14 samples 1 sample 2,800 200Total $13,630 $470

*30.5 MH × $60 per MH = $1,830

21b - 22Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Cost/kg Traditional ABC(Overhead) System SystemAldehyde $ 2.00 $ 1.95PH $20.00 $94.00

Activity-Based Costing System

What is the overhead cost per kg? Aldehyde: $13,630 ÷ 7,000 = $1.95 PH: $470 ÷ 5 = $94

21b - 23Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Aldehyde PH Sale price per kg $10.00 $ 70.00Less: manufacturing

cost per kgDirect materials 5.00 20.00Direct labour 1.00 10.00Manufacturing overhead 1.95 94.00 Gross profit per kg $ 2.05 $(54.00)

Activity-Based Costing System

Chemtech Gross Profit per Kg.

21b - 24Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Decide when ABC is most likely

to pass the cost-benefit test.

Objective 2

21b - 25Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

The Cost-Benefit Test

ABC’s benefits are higher when...– the company produces many different

products that use different amounts of resources.

– the company has high overhead costs.– the company produces high volumes of

some products, and low volumes of other products.

21b - 26Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

The Cost-Benefit Test

The costs of adopting ABC are lower when the company has...

– accounting and information system expertise to develop the system.

– information technology (bar coding, optical scanning) to record cost driver data.

21b - 27Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

Managers don’t understand costs and profits.

The cost system is outdated.

Signs That the Cost SystemMay Be Broken

21b - 28Horngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education AustraliaHorngren ♦ Harrison ♦ Bamber ♦ Best ♦ Fraser ♦ Willett, Accounting 4e Copyright © 2004 Pearson Education Australia

End of Chapter 21B