233-executive board meeting of nha

8/9/2019 233-Executive Board Meeting of NHA

1/40

NHA Executive Board’s Confirmed Minutes

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITYSecretariat Section

CONFIRMED MINUTES

Subject: 233rd Meeting of the NHA Executive Board held on Mar

20, 2014 at Islamabad

1.

Introduction

1.1. The 233rd meeting of the Executive Board of the National

Highway Authority was held at 0900 hours on Mar 20, 2014 at the

NHA Head Office Auditorium, Islamabad. Mr Shahid Ashraf Tarar,Chairman NHA presided. List of participants is at Annex-A.

1.2. The meeting commenced with recitation of verses from the

Holy Quran and Urdu translation.

2 O i g R k Ch i NHA


2/40

2 Opening Remarks Chairman NHA


2.4. The Chairman further updated the Board about interestof Chinese firms in Karachi - Lahore Motorway Project on BOT basis.

2.5. The Chairman introduced the draft policy for construction

of new interchanges on NHA network not qualifying GoP’s investment

criteria but required by the private sector for access to a business or

residential area and requested for valuable input, guidance & further

action (Annex-B).

2.6. The Joint Secretary (MoC) suggested that the draft may be

provided to all the Board Members for review, feedback and decision

in the next meeting.

FORMAL BOARD PROCEEDINGS

3. Agenda Items

3.1. The Secretary NHA stated that 23 x working papers were

circulated in two volumes. Subject-wise distribution is as follows:-

It N


3/40


c. Construction of Leftover Works of Gwadar - Ratodero

Road Project, Gwadar - Turbat Section-I Package-IIB

(M-8) Km (100+800 to 164+250).

d. Payment of Arrears to Sacked and Re-instated

Employees of NHA under SERA 2010.

4. Agenda Item 1

Confirmation of Minutes - 232nd Meeting of the

Executive Board Held on Feb 27, 2014

4.1. The Secretary NHA solicited confirmation of minutes of

232nd Executive Board meeting held on Feb 27, 2014.

4.2. Minutes were accepted for confirmation with some

amendments.

Decision


4/40


23.5. NHA took up the case with MoC vide its letter dated Aug 23, 2013 and subsequently MoC forwarded the Summary to ECC vide its letter dated 18 September 2013. The ECC in its meeting held on Jan 8, 2013 has approved, in principle, the award of works to M/s FWO on single source basis subject to fulfillment of all codal formalities; and approval of the revised PC-I of the project by CDWP/ECNEC (Annex-

C).”

b. Following may be added at the end of Para-23.7under the head Decision:-

“in the light of ECC decision.” Suggested by VP-NESPAK

Action By : Secretary NHA

5.

Agenda Item 2

Amended PC-I for Improvement & Widening of Jaglot-

Skardu Road, S-I (163.821 Km)

Proposals


5/40


5.4. The Additional Secretary (Finance) asked about the details

of scope of work. The GM (P&CA) displayed a comparison of original

and agreed scope of works for which conditional contract agreement

was signed. The present scope of work is the same, which was

previously agreed but with additions, as under:-

S.N Description Agreed Proposal Original ProposalUnit Qty. Unit Qty.

I. Project Duration1. Total Project Duration Months 52 Months 48

II. Line2. Total length Km 163.74 Km. 163.74

III. General Index3. Design speed

Km/HrApproxLength

Km/HrApproxLength

60 Km/h 101.5 Km 90 Km/h 101.5 Km40 Km/h 50.78 Km 60 Km/h 50.78 Km30 Km/h 11.46 Km 60 Km/h 11.46 Km

IV. Width of Carriageway & Shoulders

4. (Common/Rolling

S ti ) (139 K )

M7.3 &

1 5+1 5

M

7 3 &


6/40


5.6. The VP-NESPAK enquired if the present bidding

procedure is covered under the PPRA Rules. The Member (Planning)

explained that the bidding process is very much in line with PPRA

Rules. NIT (Notice for Inviting Tenders) was published in international

newspapers and uploaded on NHA & PPRA websites and clarification

has been carried out as required by PPRA. However, during

clarification meeting M/s CGGC agreed to include balance works of

four bridges in the scope of work without additional cost.

5.7. The VP-NESPAK asked whether sizes of culverts / bridgeshave been decided, if not, it may create a dispute at later stage. The

GM (P&CA) replied that sizes are not yet fixed as being EPC contract;the contractor will design the project. However, the Member (Planning)added that NHA and Contractor are going to agree on a cost of worksand design prepared by Contractor will be implemented after approvalof NHA. NHA has made utmost efforts to submit a viable proposal byconsidering all relevant factors.

5 8 Th VP NESPAK b d th t ti t d th i


7/40


5.10. The Chief (T&C) observed that variation in cost of earthwork is more than 50%, which is the major component of overallincrease in cost of the project. The Member (Planning) explained thatterrain of the project is such that even a minor change in roadalignment requires cutting of mighty overhung rocks resulting in hugequantity of earthwork. Moreover, the GM (Design) added that the

bidder in this case is a foreign contractor and instead of NHA CSR,has worked out project cost in the light of international perspective.

5.11. The Chairman observed that when scope of work in 1st

and 2nd advertisement was same, cost enhancement in amended PC-1needs to be clarified. The VP-NESPAK supported the said point of viewand added that it appears that the cost is on higher side because of

foreign funding. The cost would have been much lesser than theassessment by foreign donor, if the project be carried out throughPSDP.

5.12. The Additional Secretary (Finance) asked about the

vetting of financial assessment and allocation of loan. The Member

(Planning) explained that the project cost is based on the offer of

bidd H l ill b d & i d b E i Aff i


8/40


deliberated in detail and necessary documents were shared with theBoard Member. The complete extent of work done by NHA and the

Chinese Contractor M/s CGGC was shown to the Board Member who

was satisfied with the details provided; however, he desired that PC-I

should include comparison of cost that if the same project is executed

by GoP with its own resources, what would be the cost difference.

NHA agreed that PC-I shall include this comparison. The VP-NESPAK

further desired that the contract should include various binding

requirements at specific locations, similar to the addendum signed in

CRBC case. The Member was assured that the contract which is now

in draft form shall include the same.

5.15. Subsequently, the same was discussed with Chief (T&C)

who also supported the point of view and desired that justification of

increase in cost be made part of amended PC-I, and cleared it to be

forwarded to CDWP / ECNEC for consideration.

Decision

5 16 Th E ti B d d d th d d PC I f


9/40


Deliberation

6.2. The General Manager (Design) presented the case.

6.3. The VP-NESPAK enquired whether this case of extension

in contract is covered under PPRA Rules. The GM (Design) explained

that the Consultant is working in NHA before promulgation of PPRA

Rules and it is an extension in running contract and not a fresh case. The Joint Secretary (MoC) opined that it is a kind of appointment of a

firm and should be covered under PPRA Rules. The Member (Planning)

informed that PPRA Rules deals with fresh procurements only and not

extensions. He added that Mr Iqbal Haq has a very high professional

expertise having Doctorate in the Structural Engineering, his

contributions through review of various designs prepared by differentconsultancy firms resulted in huge savings. The GM (Design) stressed

that the firm is essentially required in the interest of public works and

it would be difficult to find his replacement keeping in view the dearth

of structural engineers in Pakistan due to brain drain.

6 4 Th VP NESPAK t d th t th f t i i


10/40


7. Agenda Item 4Procurement Procedure for Hiring of Consultancy

Services in NHA

Introduction

7.1. The Executive Board in its 226th meeting of Feb 26, 2013

instructed to prepare and give a detailed presentation on general

procedure for hiring consultancy services in NHA.

Deliberation

7.2. The General Manager (P&CA) presented the case. He

briefed the Board about procurement procedure including pre-

qualification, invitation to consultants, submission, opening &

evaluation of technical / financial proposals, evaluation criteria and

powers for acceptance of constancy services both for local & foreign

consultants.

7 3 Th VP NESPAK d h li i


11/40


7.5. The VP-NESPAK observed that criteria for foreign & local

bidders be addressed properly and separately. The Member (Planning)

explained that separate criteria in mega projects where foreign

funding is involved is always considered, however, in PSDP projects

criteria remains same. The Chairman supported explanation of the

Member (Planning) and suggested that VP-NESPAK and Chief (T&C)

may add their input for improvement of procurement procedures.

Decision

7.6. The NHA Executive Board decided that the criteria be

reviewed and finalized under the guidance of VP-NESPAK and Chief

(T&C) by P&CA Section and the same should be submitted to the

Board in next meeting.

Action By : Member (Planning)

8. Agenda Item 5

Add d 5 f M/ NESPAK f C l


12/40


8.3. The Chief (T&C) asked about the number of Consultant

staff deputed at site during the project suspension period. The

Member (Const) informed that essentially required reduced staff was

deployed. On the query of Chairman about completion of remaining

works of the project, the Member (Const) informed that works would

be completed within 6 months.

8.4. The Board deliberated and cleared the proposal.

Decision

8.5. The NHA Executive Board approved Addendum-5 of M/s

NESPAK for consultancy services for widening & strengthening of

Waigum - Rud - Khajuri - Bewata Road Project (N-70) amounting to

Rs 61,063,217/- (Rupees sixty one million, sixty three thousand, two hundred &

seventeen) only, with financial impact of 151% with extension in

consultancy from Jan 1, 2009 to Dec 31, 2013, along with additional

time upto Jun 30, 2014 with nominal staff for finalization of accounts

d l bli i


13/40


9.3. The Chief (T&C) observed that the PC-I cost has beenshown for the whole project of M-8, whereas, the Addendum-5R

pertains to Gwadar - Turbat - Hoshab Section (193 km). This should

be corrected for record purpose.


Decision

9.5. The Executive Board approved Addendum-5R of the

Consultant M/s LRA Group from Aug 1, 2011 upto April 30, 2014 for

construction supervision of Gwadar - Turbat - Hoshab Section (M-8)

amounting to Rs 15,532,651/- (Rupees fifteen million, five hundred thirty two

thousand, six hundred & fifty one) only.

Action By : Member (Construction)

10. Agenda Item 7

Revised PC-I for Construction of Baba Farid Bridge

P j A Ri S l j


14/40


10.3. The VP-NESPAK asked about the reasons of damages. TheGM (Const) explained that breach of Mari Creek by the locals and

pressure of flood water caused severe detrimental effects to the bridge

structure & guide banks.

10.4. The Chief (T&C) suggested that NHA may approach the

respective authorities for funding of losses caused due to breach of

creek. The Chairman viewed that GM NHA should persuade the

community of the area in connection with closure of creek with the

support of local dignitaries including MNAs & MPAs, otherwise,

construction of bridge would be difficult and their agricultural land

would be wasted apart from damage to their livelihood.

10.5. The Chairman further viewed that a committee may be

appointed to inspect the project site and furnish report /

recommendations for damages/ restoration and subsequently take up

a case for consideration with comparison of cost both for revival of

contract and re-award.

0 6 Th Chi f (T&C) i f d h l i C i i


15/40


10.9. The Additional Secretary (Finance) desired that anappropriate cost effect be prepared and placed before the Board for

qualitative decision.

10.10. The Board decided that the proposal be resubmitted in

the light of above observations for consideration / decision in another

meeting on priority.

Decision

10.11. The Executive Board deferred the working paper with the

directions that it may be presented again at the earliest along with

previous approval of the Board regarding Factor-C and report /

recommendations of the committee with detail comparison of cost for

revival / re-award of the contract.


11. Agenda Item 8

Add d 3 f M/ R bli E i i


16/40


11.4. The Board deliberated and cleared the proposal subject to

approval of revised PC-I.

Decision

11.5. The Executive Board approved Addendum of M/s

Republic Engineering Corporation Pvt Ltd for construction

supervision of Jhalkhad - Babusar Top - Chillas Project (N-15) costing

Rs 52,227,000/- (Rupees fifty two million, two hundred & twenty seven

thousand) only, entailing aggregate variation (+) 238.10% to original

contract. This Addendum also includes cost accrued on account of

enhanced charge rates (50%) from Jan 1, 2009 to Mar 31, 2015 duly

approved by NHA Executive Board in its 194th meeting of Aug 5, 2010.

11.6. This Addendum regularizes EoT extension in time from

Jan 1, 2010 to Mar 31, 2015 (including three months with selected

staff for project accounts finalization).

b ( )


17/40


a. Initially in purview of the Patent Rights and bank

guarantee of M/s RECO it was decided by the

Executive Board to extend the technical services of

M/s RECO till the completion of the project and

granted an Extension in technical assistance of M/s

RECO for 24 months at the lump sum rate of Rs 5

million per month up to Nov 9, 2006, however, works

could not be completed in the extended period.

b. Member Motorways further accorded provisional

approval of the extension in services of M/s RECO

for 12 months ie Feb 9, 2007 to Feb 8, 2008 at the

lump sum rate of Rs 5 million per month. It is

pertinent to mention her that Member (Motorways) is

not the competent authority of approving such

extensions incurring huge financial impacts,

Moreover this provisional approval was not converted

h f l l b h


18/40


Decision

12.4. The Executive Board accorded in-principle approval for re-

rating proceedings by the re-rating committee with additional mandate

for fact finding and fixation of responsibility.


13. Agenda Item 10

Addendum-5 of M/s Associated Consulting Engineers

(ACE) for Construction Supervision of Takhtbhai –

Dargai Section (N-45)

Proposal

13.1. The Executive Board is requested to accord approval of

Addendum-5 of M/s ACE amounting to Rs 18,482,422/- for

supervisory services rendered from Jun 1, 2011 to Jun 30, 2013 with

revised contract cost of Rs 55,159,576/- having aggregate effect of (+)


19/40


14. Agenda Item 11Payment of Arrears of Pay & Allowances wef Sep 12,2005 Due to Upgradation of Posts of Audit andAccounts Cadre

14.1. The subject agenda item was withdrawn by Member(Finance), hence not discussed.

Action By : Member (Finance)

15. Agenda Item 12Variation Order-1 of M/s Techno Time ConstructionCompany for Construction of Bridge Across VadoorNullah (N-70, Km 96-97)

Proposal

15.1. The Executive Board is requested to approve:-

a. Variation Order-1 of M/s Techno Time Construction

Company for Construction of Bridge over Vadoor

Nullah at km 96-97 (N-70) NCB-S-12 costing Rs


20/40


2 additional spans, increase in length of bridge from 120 m to 160 m,number & length of piles from 22 m to 36 m, number of girders from

24 to 32, etc. The Member (Ops) also confirmed that ADB has

accorded concurrence to the subject VO.

15.4. The Chief (T&C) enquired about the source of level of

discharge and effect on approach roads due to revised design. The

Member (Ops) explained that discharge values have been taken from

Punjab Irrigation Department and the length of approach roads is also

affected.


Decision

15.6. The Executive Board approved Variation Order-1 of M/s

Techno Time Construction Company for Construction of Bridge over

Vadoor Nullah at km 96-97 (N-70) NCB-S-12 costing Rs 46,551,928/-

(Rupees forty six million, five hundred fifty one thousand, nine hundred &


21/40


i. a) All NHA employees in BS 1-16 be elevated to

the next scale as per criteria already approved

by the Executive Board in its 223rd meeting of

Nov 7, 2012 (agenda item-10)- 507 employees

OR

b) For compliance of the Court orders, all the

appellants (37 employees) be up-graded at

par with their counterparts in Accounts/

Audit cadres and later on all such up-graded

posts be re-designated after considering the

job structure in other departments in view of its suitability and practicability.

ii. To facilitate the implementation of recommendations

at (i)(a) or (i)(b) above, promotion quota may be

reviewed and necessary amendments be processed in

the NHA Service Rules.


22/40


16.5. The Additional Secretary (Finance) viewed that, theimportant factor in this case is to ensure that, the decision of Board

should not establish a precedent for other employees of the Federal

Government for upgradation.

16.6. The Chairman observed that financial impact against

proposed upgradation given in 16.1-i. a), ie Rs 14.139 million per

annum seems incorrect and needs to be revisited / confirmed.

16.7. The Joint Secretary (MoC) suggested that since important

issues are involved for decision in the case, therefore, a committee

may be constituted to scrutinized the recommendations of the sub-

committee and submit a viable proposal for decision. The Member

(Planning) opined that due to orders of honorable High Court the

Board give clear decision to satisfy the said orders.

16.8. After detailed deliberations the Board agreed to the

proposal at 16.1-i. a), in principle, and decided that the committee

work out details of exact number of employees that will benefit from


23/40


c. To work out the financial impact of the proposal.

d. To suggest amendments in NHA Service Rules /

Regulations required.

Action By : Member (Admn)

17. Agenda Item 14

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for NHA’s Hajj

Policy

Proposal

17.1. The Executive Board is requested to approve the SOP for

NHA’s Hajj Policy. Salient features are given in succeeding Paras.

17.2. The Hajj Fund, to be operated & maintained under the

overall supervision of Member (Finance), will be contributed by NHA


24/40


Scale Nomination Sharea. BS-1 to 16 60 %b. BS-17 to 22 30 %c. BS-1 to 22 *

(Age between 55 to 60 years)10 %

* Note. To provide enhanced opportunity to employees nearer to retirement.

Deliberation

17.5. The Member (Admn) presented the case.


Decision

17.7. The Executive Board approved the SOP for NHA’s Hajj

Policy (Annex-C).

Action By : Member (Admn)


25/40


19. Agenda Item 18

Conditional/Provisional Award of the Project for

“Improvement, Up-gradation & Widening of Jaglot-

Skardu Road (S-I) on Supplier/Buyer Credit Basis” to

M/s China Gezhouba Group International EngineeringCompany Ltd (CGGC) on Buyer Credit Basis

Proposal

19.1. The Executive Board is requested to accord approval for

Conditional/Provisional award of the Project for “Improvement, Up-gradation & Widening of Jaglot - Skardu Road (S-1) on Supplier/

Buyer Credit Basis” to M/s China Gezhouba Group International

Engineering Company Ltd (CGGC) on Buyer Credit basis at their

evaluated / rebated bid price of US$ 396,422,221.79.


26/40


Decision

19.5. The Executive Board approved conditional / provisional

award of the Project for “Improvement, Up-gradation & Widening of

Jaglot - Skardu Road (S-1) on Supplier / Buyer Credit Basis” to M/s

China Gezhouba Group International Engineering Company Ltd.

(CGGC) on Buyer Credit basis at their evaluated / rebated bid price of

US$ 396,422,221.79 (US$ three hundred ninety six million, four hundred

twenty two thousand, two hundred twenty one point seven nine) only subject

to approval of PC-I and signing of loan agreement.

Action By : Member (Planning)

20. Agenda Item 19

Revised PC-I: Dualization of N-70/M-4 Link

Interchange-Punjab (Nagshah Chowk) Multan Crossing

N-70 From Multan to Shujaabad

Agenda Item 20


27/40


21. Agenda Item 23

Re-Designation of Upgraded Posts of Accounts/Audit

Cadre

Proposal

21.1. The Executive Board is requested to consider the

proposals for re-designation of the following upgraded Account’s cadre

posts to remove anomaly:-

Posts Upgraded

BPS

Proposed re-designation

a. AD (Accounts / Audit /

Budget / Finance) BS-17

BS-18 Senior AD (Accounts/

Audit/Budget/Finance)

b. Superintendent

(Accounts/Audit/Budget

/ Finance) BS-16

BS-17 Senior Superintendent

(Accounts/Audit/Budget/

Finance)

c. (Accounts/Audit/Budget)

Assistants (BS-14)

BS-16 Junior Superintendent

(Accounts/Audit /Budget)

d. Senior Accounts Clerk BS-14 Additional Account Clerk


28/40


Posts Upgraded

BPS

Re-designation

a. AD (Accounts / Audit /

Budget / Finance) BS-17

BS-18 Assistant Manager (Accounts/

Audit / Budget/ Finance)

b. Superintendent

(Accounts/Audit/Budget

/ Finance) BS-16

BS-17 Officer (Accounts / Audit/

Budget / Finance)

c. (Accounts/Audit/Budget)

Assistants (BS-14)

BS-16 Junior Officer

(Accounts /Audit /Budget)

d. Senior Accounts Clerk

(BS-9)

BS-14 Accounts Clerk (Accounts /

Audit / Budget/ Finance)

e. Junior Accounts Clerk

(BS-7)

BS-11 Assistant Accounts Clerk

(Accounts / Audit / Budget /

Finance)

Decision

21.5. The Executive Board approved the re-designation of

Accounts Cadre posts mentioned in Para-22.4. Case for necessary

amendments in relevant NHA’s Rules / Regulations be processed for


29/40


Additional Agenda Item-II

Construction of Leftover Works of Gwadar - Turbat -

Hoshab Road Project (M-8), Turbat - Hoshab Section-

IIA Km (0+000 to 76+250)

Proposal

22.2. The Executive Board is requested to accord approval foraward of the works for Construction of Leftover Works on Turbat -

Hoshab Section-IIA Km (0+000 to 76+250) of Gwadar - Turbat -

Hoshab Road Project (M-8) to the only participated and technically

qualified bidder ie M/s Frontier Works Organization, at their

evaluated / rebated bid price of Rs 4,975,574,286/-, which is 64.45%

above the Engineer’s Estimates of Rs 3,025,527,730/- based on CSR-2013.

Additional Agenda Item-III

Construction of Leftover Works of Gwadar - Ratodero

Road Project, Gwadar - Turbat Section-I Package-IIB


30/40


22.6. The VP-NESPAK enquired about evaluation of firms. The

GM (P&CA) informed that although six firms purchased bid

documents, but only FWO submitted the bid. Because of law & order

situation in the area most of the firms are not participating in the

bidding process.

22.7. The Chief (T&C) opined that cost effect in all such cases is

on higher level, which need to be seen carefully and security aspects

be attended separately.

23.8. The IG (NH&MP) added that although security problems

are there, however, NHA may ensure safety & security by getting help

from Army & FC, so that works should be carried on in such areas

smoothly.

22.9. The Chief (T&C) and VP-NESPAK asked about variation

percentage. The GM (P&CA) informed as under:-

a. Gwadar - Turbat Sec-I, Pack-IIA (M-8) Km (47+200 to


31/40


22.12. The Chairman highlighted that due to prevailing law &

order situation and strategic nature of the project, which will not only

help operationalize the Gwadar Port but also be instrumental in

ensuring access to the area; thus special dispensation of the project is

warranted.

22.13. The Executive Board after detailed deliberations cleared

proposal for Gwadar - Turbat Sec-I, Pack-IIA (M-8) Km (47+200 to

100+800) 56.47% above the Engineer’s Estimates and directed for

rationalization of rates in other two packages.

Decision

22.14. The Executive Board decided as under:-

a. Accorded approval for award of the works for

Construction of Leftover Works of Gwadar - Ratodero

Road Project, Gwadar - Turbat Section-I Package-IIA


32/40


23. Additional Agenda Item-IV

Payment of Arrears to Sacked and Re-instated

Employees of NHA Under SERA 2010

Proposal

23.1. The Executive Board is requested to give decision forpayment of arrears to Sacked & Re-instated employees of NHA under

SERA 2010 on the directions of Honorable Islamabad High Court.

Deliberation

23.2. The Member (Finance) presented the case. He informedthat approximately Rs 608 million are to be paid to 453 Sacked

employees on account of 3 years arrears. The Honorable Islamabad

High Court has dismissed NHA’s intra court appeal on Mar 19, 2014

and directed that the order of the court shall be implemented in its

letter & spirit within one month. The last date of order of the court is


33/40


24. Conclusion

24.1. The Chairman wrapped up the meeting by thanking the

Board Members for their active participation and useful input.

-----------------------


34/40


EXTRACTS

DRAFT MINUTES OF THE

233RD EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING

MARCH 20, 2014 AT ISLAMABAD


35/40


NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY

CONFIRMED MINUTES

233rd Executive Board Meeting

Islamabad, March 20, 2014

INDEX

PARA AGENDA ITEM PAGE ACTION BY

1. Introduction 1 ---

2. Opening Remarks (Chairman NHA) 1 ---

3. Formal Proceedings (Agenda Items) 2 ---

4. Agenda Item 1Confirmation of Minutes - 232nd Meeting of theExecutive Board Held on Feb 27, 2014

3 Secy NHA

5. Agenda Item 2Amended PC-I for Improvement & Widening of Jaglot-

Skardu Road, S-I (163.821 Km)4 Mem (P)


36/40



12. Agenda Item 9Lyari Expressway Project: V O No 10 (Ex-post factoapproval of Continuation of Technical Assistance &Supervision by M/s RECO)

16 Mem (C)

13. Agenda Item 10Addendum-5 of M/s Associated Consulting Engineers(ACE) for Construction Supervision of Takhtbhai –

Dargai Section (N-45)

18 Mem (C)

14. Agenda Item 11Payment of Arrears of Pay & Allowances wef Sep 12,2005 Due to Upgradation of Posts of Audit andAccounts Cadre

19Mem (F)

15. Agenda Item 12Variation Order-1 of M/s Techno Time Construction

Company for Construction of Bridge Across VadoorNullah (N-70, Km 96-97)

19 Mem (O)

16. Agenda Item 13Elevation of NHA Employees Working in BS-1 to 16:

Report by the Executive Board’s Sub-CommitteeConstituted for Review of Board’s Decision taken in its223rd Meeting of Nov 7, 2012

20 Mem (A)


37/40



20. Agenda Item 19Revised PC-I: Dualization of N-70/M-4 LinkInterchange-Punjab (Nagshah Chowk) Multan CrossingN-70 From Multan to Shujaabad

26 Mem (C) Agenda Item 20Addendum-3 of M/s A.A Associates: Construction of Approach Road on Larkana Side of Larkana Khairpur

Bridge (Pack-I&IV)

Agenda Item 21Addendum-4 of M/s EA Consulting (Pvt) Ltd forConsultancy Supervision of Improvement of Inner City Ring Road, Multan Project

Agenda Item 22Revised Addendum-15 of M/s EA Consulting (Pvt) Ltd

for Construction Supervision of Lyari Expressway Project

21. Agenda Item 23Re-Designation of Upgraded Posts of Accounts/Audit

Cadre27 Mem (A)

22. Additional Agenda Item-I


38/40


Annex-A

NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

233RD EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETINGMARCH 20, 2014 AT ISLAMABAD

IN CHAIR

1. Mr Shahid Ashraf Tarar Chairman

MEMBERS

2. Mr Zulfiqar Ahmad Cheema Inspector General, NationalHighways & Motorway Police


39/40


-2-

NHA OFFICERS ITEM

11. Mr Yousaf Ali Khan Member (AP)5 to 10

& 19 to 22

12. Mr Usman Akhtar Bajwa Member (Admn)13 to 17, 23 &

A4

13. Mr Arshad Mahmood Ch Member (Ops) 12

14. Mr Pervez Iqbal Sulehri GM (P&CA) 2, 4 & A1 to A3

15. Mr Asim Amin GM (Design) 3

16. Mr Tufail ShaikhGM (Con),Punjab-South

7


40/40

233RD Meeting, March 20, 2014, Islamabad


233-executive board meeting of nha

Documents