24 september 2014 report

8/9/2019 24 September 2014 Report

1/25

"THE"NORMATIVE

THEORYFameronag. Fernando. Geroche. Javier.


2/25


3/25

Defnition o Terms

NORMATIV


4/25

Defnition o Terms

LIBERALISM


5/25

History

English civil war during th! #$%s

&'hn L'c( )*ath r '* +'d rnli, ralis+-. th /Tw' Tr atis s0as th *'undati'n '* th li, ralid 'l'g1


6/25

History

R sult d t' vari'us r v'luti'ns atthat ti+ N w strands and id as a,'ut

Li, ralis+ + rg d2 RadicalLi, ralis+ )3ain - Li, ralis+ inEc'n'+ics )Mill4 S+ith- S'cial

Li, ralis+ )Mill- N w Li, ral)H',h'us 4 H',s'n- N '5li, ralis+ 5 a*t r 66II


7/25

Key Concepts

Classical Liberalism John Locke

DeontologicalDoctrine


8/25


9/25

Key Concepts

Utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham

John Stuart ill


10/25


11/25

Key Concepts

!e" Liberalism

L#T Hobhouse an$

J#% Hobson John &a"ls


12/25


13/25

%pplication

"3'litical Sci nc sh'uld ,int r st d n't 'nl1 inund rstanding 7what is74 it sh'uld

als' , c'nc rn d with thn'r+ativ issu s '* 7what sh'uld, 78"


14/25

%pplication

"E+9irical R s arch can ,guid d ,1 n'r+ativ th 'r14and n'r+ativ th 'r1 can ,i+9r'v d ,1 +9iricalr s arch"8

: )Bau,'c( ;$$


15/25

%pplication

"Empirical theoristscan beneft romthe specifcationand clarifcation oarguments

provided by

normative theoryand normativetheorists would dowell to look to

empirical researchrather thanhypotheticalarguments to help

support their case."


16/25

%ttitu$e o Disciplines to!ormati'e (olitical Theory

%pproach Scope o (oliticalStu$ies

%ttitu$e to!ormati'e

(olitical Theory

B havi'ralis+

='nc ntrat s 'n9r'c ss s '*

9'litics ass'ciat dwith +ainstr a+

9'litics and

g'v rn+ nt

In arl1 9has ( nt' +9hasi>

di? r nc , tw nth n w sci ncand 'ld ar+chairth 'ri>ing8 N'w

giv s du

r c'gniti'n t' thvalu '* 9'litical

th 'r18

Rati'nal =h'ic

='nc rn d withc'nditi'ns *'r

c'll ctiv acti'n in

@iv s r c'gniti'n t'th valu '*

9'litical th 'r1 ,ut*'cus is l ss 'n


17/25

Instituti'nalis+

'cus is 'n thrul s4 n'r+s and

valu s that g'v rn9'litical chang s.

t nds t' l''( at

instituti'nalarrang + nts in

+ainstr a+9'litical w'rld

C n t' +a(c'nn cti'ns

, tw n +9irical

anal1sis andn'r+ativ th 'r1

='nstructivis+

3'litics is driv n ,1th + anings that

act'rs attach t'th ir acti'ns and

th ir c'nt t83'litics can ,

,r'ad in sc'9r D cting 9 '9l 7s

Tnds t' th vi wthat th r is *usi'n, tw n all t19 s

'* th 'ri>ing83'litical anal1sis is

ss ntiall1c'nt st d and has



18/25

3s1ch'l'g1

Vi ws 9'liticsthr'ugh th l ns '*th 9 rs'nalit1 and

c'gniti'n '* thindividuals wh'

ngag in its9ractic 4 9ri+aril1

within th+ainstr a+ w'rld

6'uld t nd t' vi wassu+9ti'ns +ad

a,'ut hu+annatur in +uch

9'litical th 'r1 asinad uat 8

)enerally notoriente$ to"ar$snormati'e theory

+inis+

A ,r'ad 9r'c ssd Fniti'n that

r c'gni> s that th9 rs'nal can ,

9'litical

N'r+ativ th 'r14li( all as9 cts '*9'litical studi s4

n ds t' ta(g nd r issu s

s ri'usl1



19/25


20/25

ar*ism

(olitics is astruggle bet"een

social groups+ inparticular socialclasses

!ormati'e theoryis at its most use ul"hen it pro'i$es a

gui$e to action, thepoint is to change

the "orl$



21/25

Criticisms

A8 =ritical Th 'r1!8 H'r(h i+ r and

Ad'rn';8 Marcus

G8 Ha, r+as


22/25

Criticisms

A8 ='++unitarianis+!8 ailur s '* Rawls%

Th 'ri s '* &ustic;8 sand l

G8 6al> r#8 ra>


23/25

Criticisms

A8 3OST5MO ERNISM!8 O =ALT

;8 RORTY


24/25

Conclusion

N'n5d'+inati'n VS N'n5int r* r nc T' what t nt sh'uld li, ral stat sad'9t 9'lici s g ar d t' +at rial

r distri,uti'nJ Sh'uld th stat l gislat *'r+'ralsJ

H'w sh'uld li, rals r s9'nd t'illi, ral , li *sJ


25/25

THE CLASS WOULD BE DISMISSEDEARLIER IF YOU DO NOT ASK

QUESTIONS

24 september 2014 report

Documents