25-1 chapter 14 statute of frauds and equitable exceptions
TRANSCRIPT
25-1
Chapter 14
Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions
Statute of Frauds for Common Contracts
Statute of Frauds: A state statute that requires certain types of contracts to be in writing
14-2Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Contracts that Must Be in Writing
Contracts involving interests in real property Contracts that by their own terms cannot possibly be
performed within one year Collateral contracts in which a person promises to
answer for the debt or duty of another Promises made in consideration of marriage Contracts for the sale of goods for $500 or more Contracts for the lease of goods with payments of
$1,000 or more
14-3Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Contracts that Must Be in Writing
Real estate agents’ contracts Agents’ contracts where the underlying contract must
be in writing Promises to write a will Contracts to pay debts barred by the statute of
limitations or discharged in bankruptcy Contracts to pay compensation for services rendered
in negotiating the purchase of a business Finder’s fee contracts
14-4Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Contracts Involving Interests in Real Property
Real property: The land itself, as well as buildings, trees, soil, minerals, timber, plants, crops, fixtures and other things permanently affixed to the land or buildings
14-5Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Contracts Involving Interests in Real Property
Other contracts that transfer an ownership interest in land must be in writing under the Statute of Frauds Mortgages Leases Life Estates Easements
14-6Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
One-Year Rule
A rule that states that an executory contract that cannot be performed by its own terms within one year of its formation must be in writing
14-7Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Exhibit 14.1 Guaranty contract
14-8Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Case 14.1: Guaranty Contract
Case Page v. Gulf Coast Motors 903 So.2d 148, Web 2004 Ala. Civ. App. Lexis 982 (2004) Court of Civil Appeal of Alabama
Issue Was Mary’s alleged oral promise to guarantee her
husband’s debts an enforceable guaranty contract?
14-9Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Agents’ Contracts
Many state Statutes of Frauds require that agents’ contracts to sell real property covered by the Statute of Frauds be in writing to be enforceable
The requirement is referred to as the equal dignity rule Equal dignity rule: A rule that says that agents’
contracts to sell property covered by the Statute of Frauds must be in writing to be enforceable
14-10Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Promises Made in Consideration of Marriage
Under the Statute of Frauds, a unilateral promise to pay money or property in consideration for a promise to marry must be in writing
14-11Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
UCC Statutes of Fraud
Section 2-201(1) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): A section of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) that states that sales contracts for the sale of goods costing $500 or more must be in writing
Section 2-201(1) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC): A section of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) that states that sales contracts for the sale of goods costing $500 or more must be in writing
14-12Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Equitable Exception: Part Performance
If an oral contract for the sale of land or transfer of other interests in real property has been partially performed, it may not be possible to return the parties to their status quo To solve this problem, the courts have developed
the equitable doctrine of part performance
14-13Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Equitable Exception: Part Performance
Part performance: An equitable doctrine that allows the court to order an oral contract for the sale of land or transfer of another interest in real property to be specifically performed if it has been partially performed and performance is necessary to avoid injustice
14-14Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Formality of the Writing
A written contract does not have to be drafted by a lawyer or formally typed to be legally binding
The law only requires a writing containing the essential terms of the parties’ agreement
14-15Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Required Signature
Statute of Frauds and the UCC require the written contract, whatever its form, to be signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought
If a signature is suspected of being forged, the victim can hire handwriting experts and use modern technology to prove it is not his or her signature
14-16Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Integration of Several Writings
The combination of several writings to form a single contract
Incorporation by reference: Integration made by express reference in one document that refers to and incorporates another document within it
14-17Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Interpreting Contract Words and Terms
If the parties have not defined the words and terms of a contract, the courts apply the following standards of interpretation Ordinary words are given their usual meaning
according to the dictionary Technical words are given their technical meaning
unless a different meaning is clearly intended
14-18Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Interpreting Contract Words and Terms
Specific terms presumed to qualify general terms Trade usage incorporated in contract unless otherwise
stated Where a preprinted form contract is used:
Typed words prevail over preprinted words Handwritten words prevail over both preprinted
and typed words Ambiguity resolved against drafter of contract
14-19Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Parol Evidence Rule
Parol Evidence – Any oral or written words outside the four corners of a written contract.
Parol Evidence Rule: A rule that says if a written contract is a complete and final statement of the parties’ agreement, any prior or contemporaneous oral or written statements that alter, contradict, or are in addition to the terms of the written contract are inadmissible in court regarding a dispute over the contract
14-20Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Parol Evidence Rule
Merger clause (integration clause): A clause in a contract that stipulates that it is a complete integration and the exclusive expression of the parties’ agreement
14-21Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Exceptions to Parol Evidence Rule
Parol evidence may be admitted in court if it: Shows that a contract is void or voidable Explains ambiguous language Concerns a prior course of dealing or course of
performance between the parties or a usage of trade
Fills in the gaps in a contract Corrects an obvious clerical or typographical error
14-22Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Case 14.2: Parol Evidence Rule
Case Yarde Metals, Inc. v. New England Patriots
Limited Partnership 834 N.E.2d 1233, Web 2005 Mass. App. Lexis 904 (2005) Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Issue Does Yarde have an implied right to purchase
Patriots’ season tickets?
14-23Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Equitable Exception: Promissory Estoppel
Promissory estoppel (equitable estoppel): An equitable doctrine that permits enforcement of oral contracts that should have been in writing It is applied to avoid injustice
14-24Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Equitable Exception: Promissory Estoppel
The oral promise is enforceable against the promisor if three conditions are met The promise induces action or forbearance of
action by another The reliance on the oral promise was foreseeable Injustice can be avoided only by enforcing the oral
promise
14-25Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
14-26Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.