264) assignment-part b.pdf 220179206 d g tharindu (hsns...qm qm qm qm page 5 comment 11 antibiotic...

220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS264) Assignment-Part B.pdf

by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige

Submission date: 23-Apr-2018 01:52PM (UTC+1000)Submission ID: 951665646File name:140127_Tharindu_Dushyantha_Dewalegama_Gamacharige_220179206_D_G_Tharindu__HSNS_264__Assign.pdfWord count: 1853Character count: 11143

Paper Reviewed by Dr Z Smith U/C

well done

1

2

well done

3

Citat ion Needed

4

I

Citat ion Needed

Citat ion Needed

S

S

I

11

Support

12

Citat ion Needed

A

Citat ion Needed

14

Citat ion Needed

r

Weak T ransit ion16

Citat ion Needed

AS

B P

well done

21

well done

P

Citat ion Needed

PCitat ion Needed

A P

26

17%SIMILARITY INDEX

10%INTERNET SOURCES

4%PUBLICATIONS

16%STUDENT PAPERS

1 5%

2 2%

3 1%

4 1%

5 1%

6 1%

7 1%

8 1%

9 1%

220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS 264) Assignment-Part B.pdfORIGINALITY REPORT

PRIMARY SOURCES

Submitted to University of NewcastleStudent Paper

Submitted to Charles Sturt UniversityStudent Paper

Submitted to Bath Spa University CollegeStudent Paper

Submitted to University of NorthamptonStudent Paper

Submitted to 97324Student Paper

Submitted to City High-Middle SchoolStudent Paper

faculty.mercer.eduInternet Source

Submitted to Queensland University ofTechnologyStudent Paper

Submitted to Flinders UniversityStudent Paper

10 1%

11 1%

12 1%

13 1%

14 <1%

15 <1%

Exclude quotes Of f

Exclude bibliography Of f

Exclude matches Of f

Submitted to University of Central LancashireStudent Paper

Submitted to University of New EnglandStudent Paper

Submitted to University of South AustraliaStudent Paper

admin.isprambiente.gov.itInternet Source

www.csu.edu.auInternet Source

www.nanda-books.comInternet Source

QM

QM

QM

FINAL GRADE

18/25

220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS 264) Assignment-Part B.pdfGRADEMARK REPORT

GENERAL COMMENTS

Instructor

Well Done

A very well presented academic article.

You have good knowledge of the treatment required f or Asthmatic patients.

Some minor spelling errors throughout and you justneeded to support a f ew important pieces ofinf ormation f or me.

Fiona Wiggins. RN.

PAGE 1



well donewell done

PAGE 2

Comment 1oedma - spelling error.

Comment 2Please no need to ref erence within the introduction.

well donewell done

QM

QM

QM

Comment 3spelling error

PAGE 3

Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html

Comment 4spelling error.

PAGE 4

Text Comment. I

Strikethrough.



Text Comment. S

Strikethrough.

Text Comment. S

Strikethrough.

Text Comment. I

Strikethrough.

Strikethrough.

Strikethrough.

QM

QM

QM

QM

PAGE 5

Comment 11Antibiotic would have been a better word used here.

SupportSupport Needed:A well-written paper will include strong support f or its thesis. Support f or your thesis shouldcome f rom primary (original documents, interviews, and personal experiences) and secondary(inf ormation that has been processed or interpreted by someone else) sources. To use yoursupport ef f ectively, you must elaborate upon the inf ormation, quotations, and examples takenf rom your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also important to remember to cite thesources of the evidence and support you use in your paper.

Comment 12Please use the f ull Upper Respiratory Tract Inf ection in the f irst instance then you mayabbreviate f ollowing same.


Text Comment. A

Strikethrough.


PAGE 6

Comment 14Non steroidal anti inf lammatory drugs.


Text Comment. r

Strikethrough.

QM

QM

QM

QM

Weak TransitionWeak paragraph transit ion:Although paragraphs are separate, individual steps of your paper, it is important to clearlydemonstrate a logical connection between them. Generally speaking, the way your paragraphsrelate to one another displays how sound your argument really is. A paragraph that begins with"also" or "in addition" of f ers a weak transit ion f rom the previous point, even though it maydevelop a highly interesting and related point.

Comment 16spelling.


Text Comment. A

Text Comment. S

Strikethrough.

Strikethrough.

Text Comment. B

Text Comment. P

Strikethrough.

Strikethrough.

well donewell done

Comment 21You need to discuss the multidisciplinary team here and 24 hours care plan.

PAGE 7

well donewell done

Text Comment. P

QM

QM

Strikethrough.


Text Comment. P


Strikethrough.

Text Comment. A

Text Comment. P

Strikethrough.

Strikethrough.

Comment 26spelling error.

PAGE 8

PAGE 9

RUBRIC: HSNS264_T12018A3B

CRITERIA 1 (40%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)

CRITERIA 2 (30%)

71.50 / 100

70 / 100

Content and f ocus\n \nDemonstrates an understanding of the pharmacodynamics of Asthma Medications

Discussion successf ully demonstrates supported and substantial arguments andideas Paper thoroughly reviews and integrates current and relevantliterature



Discussion demonstrates supported and substantial arguments and ideas with onlyminor digressions Paper suf f iciently reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature

Discussion demonstrates supported and substantial arguments and ideas with onlyminor digressions Paper suf f iciently reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature

Discussion demonstrates supported and substantial arguments and ideas with somedigression Paper reviews and integrates current and relevant literature

Discussion demonstrates supported and substantial arguments and ideas with somedigression Paper reviews and integrates current and relevant literature

Discussion has limited demonstrated support and substantial arguments and ideas Paper has limited review and integration of current and relevant literature



Discussion lacks demonstrated support and substantial arguments and ideas Paper lacks review and integration of current and relevant literature



70 / 100

Provides a comprehensive 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care, assessment,interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatric patient with Asthma

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

Provides a comprehensive 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma Paper thoroughly reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature



Provides a thorough 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma Paper suf f iciently reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature

Provides a thorough 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma Paper suf f iciently reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature

Provides a substantial 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma Paper reviews and integrates current and relevantliterature

Provides a substantial 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma Paper reviews and integrates current and relevantliterature

Provides an adequate 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma Paper presents limited reviews and integration ofcurrent and relevant literature



Limited or non-existent 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma Paper lacks adequate reviews and integration ofcurrent and relevant literature

N(40)

N(35)

CRITERIA 3 (10%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)



75 / 100

Analysis and crit ical thinking

Succinctly and consistently exhibits higher- order crit ical thinking and analysis Research and Evaluation Synthesis and analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge



Exhibits strong higher-order crit ical thinking and analysis Synthesis andanalysis Application Comprehension Knowledge

Exhibits strong higher-order crit ical thinking and analysis Synthesis andanalysis Application Comprehension Knowledge

Generally, exhibits limited higher-order crit ical thinking and analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge

Generally, exhibits limited higher-order crit ical thinking and analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge

Exhibits simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis Comprehension Knowledge



Minimal simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis Knowledge

CRITERIA 4 (10%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)

75 / 100

Follows requirements f or structure, presentation\ngrammar and spelling.

Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment



Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment

Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places

Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places

Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion



Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion



CRITERIA 5 (10%)

HD(100)

HD(95)

HD(85)

D(80)

D(75)

C(70)

C(65)

P(60)

P(55)

P(50)

N(45)

N(40)

N(35)

75 / 100

Follows requirements f or ref erencing (APA 6th Edition) and the application of evidence

Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment



Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout theassignment

Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list Principally acknowledges sources used throughout theassignment

A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment

Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment



Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout Litt le or no acknowledgmentof sources used throughout the assignment

264) assignment-part b.pdf 220179206 d g tharindu (hsns...qm qm qm qm page 5 comment 11 antibiotic...

Documents